DOCSLIB.ORG

Sturton Ward: North and South Wheatley, Sturton Le Steeple and North Leverton with Habblesthorpe Design Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sturton Ward: North and South Wheatley, Sturton Le Steeple and North Leverton with Habblesthorpe Design Code Sturton Ward: North and South Wheatley, Sturton le Steeple and North Leverton with Habblesthorpe Design Code June 2020 Prepared for: Locality Quality information Project role Name Position Action summary Signature Date Qualifying body Alan Guest Sturton Ward Neighbourhood Review of draft baseline and 19-11-2019 Plan Steering Group design guide sections Qualifying body James Naish Sturton Ward Neighbourhood Review of draft report 15-03-2020 Plan Steering Group 11-06-2020 Researcher Nick Allin Principal Landscape Architect Research, site visits, drawings 04-06-2020 Lizzie Bushby Landscape Architect Graduate Research, site visit, drawings Hans Bedey Landscape Architect Graduate Research, site visit Technical Nigel Weir Associate Landscape Technical review Architect Director / QA Ben Castell Project Coordination Mary Kucharska Copyright and Limitations © 2020 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) for use of Locality (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. 2 AECOM Prepared for: Locality Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 1.1. Objectives ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 1.2. Process ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................5 2. Context .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 2.1. Location and area of study ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 2.2. Landscape and townscape designations .........................................................................................................................................................................................................9 2.3. Strategic issues / engagement ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4. Site allocation review ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 3. Character assessment ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 3.1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................13 3.2. Existing character assessments and design guidance ........................................................................................................................................................................13 3.3. Character assessment .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................13 4. Design code ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 4.1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................49 4.2. General design considerations ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................49 4.3. Design code ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................52 4.4. Specific design guidelines .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................62 5. Site allocations: high-level landscape and visual review ................................................................................................................................ 67 5.1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................67 5.2. Site reviews .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................67 6. High-level site plans ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 78 6.1. Approach to site plans ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................78 7. Deliverability ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 7.1. Delivery agents ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................83 7.2. Deliverability ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................83 8. Glossary of terms .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 85 9. References ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 90 AECOM 3 Introduction 01 Prepared for: Locality 1. Introduction AECOM has been commissioned to provide design support to Sturton Ward Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group through the Ministry of Housing, Communities and 1.1. Objectives Local Government's (MHCLG) Neighbourhood Planning Programme, led by Locality. The main objective of this document is to establish principles so that new development This Design Code has been produced to inform new development proposed in the area. is designed and planned with reference to the existing character and context of Sturton It presents a summary of the key characteristics of Sturton Ward which make it a special Ward, within its revised Neighbourhood Plan. It sets out a series of design guidelines place to live and visit. This information has then been used to inform specific design related to residential development. guidelines to promote sustainable development. The document initially provides context to the design guidelines, including strategic The approach set out here is supported by the National Planning Policy Framework issues identified during consultations with the Sturton Ward Neighbourhood Plan (NPPF) which encourages Local Authorities to consider using
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Step out April 2019
    Step Out April Issue, 2019 STAFFORDSHIRE AREA RAMBLERS The Ramblers’ Association is a registered charity (number 1093577) and a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales (number 4458492). The opinions expressed in Stepout are not necessarily the official views of the Ramblers, Area or National, but those of the authors concerned Photo – Autumn colours in an Urban environment CONTENTS Editorial 3 Obituary Don Evitts 3 Why Ramblers 4 Trent Valley extension in Staffordshire 6 Don’t Lose Your Way 7 Ramblers Funding 12 Photographs on Group Walks and GDPR 13 Cannock Chase ANOB Management Plan 14 Ramblers Insight Hub 15 Blocked Path…What can you do 16 Chair’s Report 17 Group Reports South Staffs Footpath Report 18 Biddulph 19 Mid Staffs 20 Sandwell 21 Stone 22 Wolverhampton 23 2 Editorial. Welcome to the Spring edition of Stepout. A subject that keeps cropping up at meetings is the question of what the Ramblers does for us. It’s a bit like the Life of Brian sketch ‘what did the Romans do for us?’ In this edition I will attempt to give an answer to that question. I know that many of us do realise the importance of the Ramblers so I apologise to those in advance. Sadly last year our past Chairman, Graham Rothery passed away. He became Area Countryside Secretary in January 2007 but later in 2008 he became Area Chairman, a position he held until November 2011. He was the MD of Pace Print, who produce Stepout for us. Walking was a great part of his life and in addition to his involvement with the Ramblers he was Chairman of the Heart of England Way Association.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 January 2008
    Response to Flooding (Drainage and Watercourses) Recommendations Title of review Flooding (Drainage and Watercourses) Date review completed 31/07/2008 Chair of the Select Committee Yvonne Davidson Lead Scrutiny Officer Martin Gately Email [email protected] Telephone 977 2826 Total number of pages 14 Recommendation 1 (of 18) Highways gullies are emptied more frequently. Preferably, a spring and autumn clean of gullies should take place. PART ONE to be completed two months after publication of review Response from the Cabinet Member/Executive to recommendation Date due Date provided I am currently in conjunction with other cabinet members considering the need for an additional £600,000 for gulley emptying and drain cleaning. Any additional investment will need to be targeted with gullies in areas prone to flooding having an increased cleaning frequency and other gullies being emptied once a year. The identification of the areas requiring more regular cleaning will be done in partnership with other drainage agencies such as the Environment Agency. PART TWO to be completed three months after Cabinet Member’s response Response from the Communities Department to progress on carrying out recommendation Date due Date provided The current aim is to make more effective use of existing budgets, and to ensure that in areas prone to flooding the gullies are kept clean as well as the drainage system that the gullies connect to, in partnership with drainage agencies. Many reports of blocked gullies are due to other problems in the drainage system, and it is important that we address the wider issue including maintenance, breakages and improvements.
    [Show full text]
  • Cycle, Walking and Wheelchair Path
    Trent Vale Trail Cycle, walking and wheelchair path Phase 2 “Connecting Collingham with Besthorpe, Girton, Spalford, South & North Clifton and the Fledborough Viaduct” Version DRAFT 1.0 12 July 2017 Produced by Jacob Florijn Alan Hudson Sustrans – Newark Group 64 Hine Avenue, Newark NG24 2LH M: 07722 656582 H: 01636 689181 Email: [email protected] Contents 1. Executive summary ........................................................................................................... 4 2. Project team and structure ................................................................................................ 7 2.1. Constitution .............................................................................................................. 7 2.2. “Friends of the TVT” resources .................................................................................... 7 3. Objective of the initiative .................................................................................................. 8 3.1. History of the southern Trent Vale area ....................................................................... 8 3.2. Trent Vale Landscape Partnership ............................................................................... 8 3.3. “Bigger and Better” RSPB initiative .............................................................................. 8 3.4. Proposal for multi-user Trent Vale Trail ........................................................................ 9 3.5. Key links & places of interest .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Radcliffe to Nottingham
    CITY • COUNTRY • COAST RADCLIFFE TO NOTTINGHAM 3 1/4 hour walk Starting from Radcliffe on Trent Railway Station, this walk takes you from the picturesque countryside to the vibrant, bustling city using quiet lanes and paths along the river Trent and Beeston Canal. Take in the breath-taking river views and explore the wide range of shops, restaurants and amenities along the way. RADCLIFFE TO NOTTINGHAM CITY • COUNTRY • COAST START Radcliffe on Trent Railway Station, Shelford Road Public carparks in Radcliffe or Nottingham. WALK LOCATION East of Nottingham, South of the River Trent Grid Reference: SK 648 394 WALK LENGTH 10 ½ km (6 ½ miles) - Up to 3 1/4 hours to complete The walk uses surfaced paths and quiet lanes, which may be muddy and uneven in places. REFRESHMENTS There’s plenty of choice in both Radcliffe and Nottingham Including a restaurant at the National Water Sports Centre. Public toilets also available. FOR MORE INFORMATION TRAIN TIMES BUS INFORMATION TOURIST INFORMATION National Rail Enquiries East Midlands Railway Lincolnshire County Council Tourist information Centre Tel: 03457 484950 Tel: 03457 125678 lincolnshire.gov.uk/busrailtravel Tel: 01522 526450 www.nationalrail.co.uk www.eastmidlandsrailway.co.uk Lincsbus.info www.visitlincolnshire.com Traveline.info For guided walks throughout the year, please visit poacherline.org.uk Poacher Line Community Rail Partnership @poacherline RADCLIFFE TO NOTTINGHAM CITY • COUNTRY • COAST MAP & DIRECTIONS Please note: All our walks can be done in the reverse direction if required A6211
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy
    DRAFT Greater Nottingham Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategy July 2021 Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Methodology 8 3. Blue-Green Infrastructure Priorities and Principles 18 4. National and Local Planning Policies 23 5. Regional and Local Green Infrastructure Strategies 28 6. Existing Blue-Green Infrastructure Assets 38 7. Blue-Green Infrastructure Strategic Networks 62 8. Ecological Networks 71 9. Synergies between Ecological and the Blue-Green Infrastructure Network 89 Appendix A: BGI Corridor Summaries 92 Appendix B: Biodiversity Connectivity Maps 132 Appendix C: Biodiversity Opportunity Areas 136 Appendix D: Natural Environment Assets 140 Appendix D1: Sites of Special Scientific Interest 141 Appendix D2: Local Nature Reserves 142 Appendix D3: Local Wildlife Sites 145 Appendix D4: Non-Designated 159 1 Appendix E: Recreational Assets 169 Appendix E1: Children’s and Young People’s Play Space 170 Appendix E2: Outdoor Sports Pitches 178 Appendix E3: Parks and Gardens 192 Appendix E4: Allotments 199 Appendix F: Blue Infrastructure 203 Appendix F1: Watercourses 204 2 1. Introduction Objectives of the Strategy 1.1 The Greater Nottingham authorities have determined that a Blue-Green Infrastructure (BGI) Strategy is required to inform both the Greater Nottingham Strategic Plan (Local Plan Part 1) and the development of policies and allocations within it. This strategic plan is being prepared by Broxtowe Borough Council, Gedling Borough Council, Nottingham City Council and Rushcliffe Borough Council. It will also inform the Erewash Local Plan which is being progressed separately. For the purposes of this BGI Strategy the area comprises the administrative areas of: Broxtowe Borough Council; Erewash Borough Council; Gedling Borough Council; Nottingham City Council; and Rushcliffe Borough Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Map and Info for Erewash Valley Trail.Pdf
    just down stream of Moorbridge Lane. Moorbridge of stream down just Sandiacre next to the Erewash Canal Canal Erewash the to next Sandiacre throughout the valley but notably at at notably but valley the throughout and hollows) meadows can be found found be can meadows hollows) and of ancient ridge and furrow (humps (humps furrow and ridge ancient of further information. further grassland and water meadows. Evidence Evidence meadows. water and grassland Erewash Valley Trail website for for website Trail Valley Erewash for its agricultural value particularly its its particularly value agricultural its for of events throughout the year, see see year, the throughout events of The valley has long been recognised recognised been long has valley The The valley hosts a range range a hosts valley The destinations. destinations. the 14th Century. 14th the and are developing as national tourist tourist national as developing are and Strelley Priory, perhaps as far back as as back far as perhaps Priory, Strelley Museum provide local tourism opportunities opportunities tourism local provide Museum monasteries such as Dale Abbey and and Abbey Dale as such monasteries Nature Reserve, DH Lawrence Birthplace and Erewash Erewash and Birthplace Lawrence DH Reserve, Nature part of a network of routes linking linking routes of network a of part Attractions such as Shipley Country Park, Attenborough Attenborough Park, Country Shipley as such Attractions stone slabbed causeway that formed formed that causeway slabbed stone ‘Monks Way’, a a Way’, ‘Monks informal policing of the area. the of policing informal Stapleford. close to the the to close are major users often providing important feedback and and feedback important providing often users major are The Saxon Cross in in Cross Saxon The building lies lies building jogging and bird watching are very popular.
    [Show full text]
  • Catchment Management Plan the Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan
    catchment management plan The Environment Agency's Vision for the Rivers Idle and Torne Catchment Management Plan he catchment of the Rivers Idle and Torne The key objectives of the plan are therefore to: T covers an area of 1 307 km2 within north Nottinghamshire and south Humberside and has • Establish a balance between the demands of a resident population of about 625,000 people. irrigation and abstraction and the needs of the environment. Man has impacted on the catchment since early times and the area has a rich industrial and • Ensure that the quality of minewater archaeological heritage. The heavily urbanised discharged to the rivers is of a and industrial headwaters contrast sharply with standard appropriate to the needs of the very flat, open and rural lower reaches nearer downstream users. to the confluences with the River Trent. Man's influence is also apparent here though where • Initiate and promote proposals for the drains have been cut and rivers re-routed and improvement of habitats for fisheries straightened to produce highly productive and conservation. agricultural areas. • Ensure that the standard of flood protection The catchment is predominantly rural with the is appropriate to the needs of the adjacent exception of the headwaters, as described above. land use, consistent with the vision. The River Idle and its tributaries flow through the heavily industrialised towns of Mansfield and The achievement of this vision is dependant on Worksop, then through the rolling forested areas the committed and enthusiastic cooperation of of Sherwood Forest and the Dukeries. The River others. Some objectives are common goals, while Torne rises on the edge of Doncaster and others may require a degree of compromise flows through the flat areas of low land, between differing demands on the resources of characterised by the Isle of Axholme, Thorne the catchment.
    [Show full text]
  • 1/16/00354/Cdm
    This matter is being dealt with by: Mike Hankin Reference: T 0115 993 2582 E [email protected] W nottinghamshire.gov.uk David L Walker Limited Albion House 89 Station Road Eckington Sheffield S21 4FW 13th July 2016 Dear Sir Re Planning Permission 1/16/00354/CDM Sand and Gravel Extraction on land to the North and East of Sturton le Steeple, Retford. Planning Condition 38 – Archaeology I write in response to your email submission dated 27th May 2016 incorporating a specification for the archaeological works provided under the requirements of Condition 38 of Planning Permission 1/16/00354/CDM. I can confirm that the archaeological works prepared by Phoenix Consulting Archaeology Limited (Reference PC448a) dated 27th May 2016 incorporates a satisfactory written scheme describing the archaeological works to be implemented across the access road, plant site, ancillary site commencement works and initial extraction phases (1 & 2) including the recharge trench. I therefore write to formally agree this specification under the requirements of Condition 38 of planning permission 1/16/00354/CDM. For the avoidance of doubt, further schemes of archaeological works will need to be submitted for subsequent phases of quarry extraction. Yours sincerely, Mike Hankin Planning Applications Senior Practitioner – Planning Group Nottinghamshire County Council Nottinghamshire County Council, County Hall, West Bridgford, Nottingham NG2 7QP Sturton-le-Steeple Quarry, Nottinghamshire PC448a 3+2(1,;&2168/7,1* A r c h a e o l o g y L i m i t e d 63(&,),&$7,21
    [Show full text]
  • Bassetlaw District Council Planning
    BASSETLAW DISTRICT COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATIONS RETFORD TIMES The following applications are being considered by the Council. Parish: Mattersey Applicant: Mr & Mrs Bower Proposal: Proposed Single Storey Rear Extension and Detached Garage with Workspace/ Garden Room Location: The Chestnuts, Abbey Road, Mattersey, Doncaster, South Yorkshire Reference No: 17/00346/HSE Reason for Advert: The application site is within a conservation area and within the setting of a listed building Parish: North Leverton & Habblesthorpe Applicant: Ms Rebecca Chadwick Proposal: Proposed Front Extension for Proposed Reception Area and Fencing Location: North Leverton C Of E School, Main Street, North Leverton, Retford Nottinghamshire Reference No: 17/00624/FUL Reason for Advert: The application site is within the setting of a listed building. The proposed development, if permitted, could affect the setting of the listed building. Parish: Tuxford (Town Council) Applicant: Capla Developments Ltd Proposal: Carry Out Repairs, Replacement and Renovation of Windows and Door Frames, Carry Out Internal Alterations, Insert Steelwork to Floors and Roof to Prevent Sag and Spread, Remove Part of Boundary Wall to Form New Entrance and Erect Two Brick Pillars Location: St Johns College Farm, Newcastle Street, Tuxford, Newark Nottinghamshire Reference No: 17/00669/LBA Reason for Advert: This application seeks listed building consent for alteration of a listed building. Parish: Retford Applicant: Mr Stuart Harrison Proposal: Change of Use to Micro-Pub Location: 108 Carolgate, Retford, Nottinghamshire, DN22 6AS Reference No: 17/00671/COU Reason for Advert: The application site is within a Conservation Area and, if permitted, the proposed development could affect the character and appearance of the Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Rights of Way Improvement Plan 2011 to 2014
    NOTTINGHAM RIGHTS OF WAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ROWIP2) SEPTEMBER 2015 For further information on this document, public rights of way or the Nottingham Local Access Forum please contact: John Lee Public Rights of Way Officer Traffic and Safety Development and Growth Nottingham City Council Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG Tele: 0115 8765246 Email: [email protected] www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/rightsofway David Bishop Corporate Director for Development and Growth Nottingham City Council Loxley House Station Street Nottingham NG2 3NG If you require this information in an alternative language, large font, Braille, audio tape or text only version please call 0115 8765246 NOTTINGHAM RIGHTS OF WAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (ROWIP2) 2015 Chapter 1: Setting the scene Page no 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Statutory requirements 1 1.3 The Nottingham Local Access Forum 1 Chapter 2: Improvements during ROWIP1 2.1 What we achieved during ROWIP1 4 2.2 Improvements schemes during ROWIP1 4 2.2.1 Hucknall Road (disused rail corridor) 4 2.2.2 Colwick Woods 5 2.2.3 Colwick Country Park footbridge 7 2.2.4 River Leen (Basford to Bulwell) 8 2.2.5 Wollaton Hall to Martin’s Pond LNR: Self–Guided Walking 11 Leaflet Chapter 3: Policy context 3.1 Safe, Clean, Ambitious, Proud 12 3.2 Council Plan 2012 – 2015 and The Nottingham Plan to 2020 12 3.3 Links between ROWIP2 and the Local Transport Plan (LTP3) 12 3.4 Health, wellbeing and quality of life benefits 15 3.4.1 Walking 15 3.4.2 Cycling 15 3.4.3 Horse riding 16 Chapter 4: Current provision 4.1 The Definitive
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes, Council, 2020 11 10
    NORTH AND SOUTH WHEATLEY PARISH COUNCIL Parish Clerk: Sara Stilliard T The Old Milking Parlour, Cottam Road, South Leverton, Retford, Notts. DN22 0BU. Tel: 01427 881582 www.northandsouthwheatleyvillage.co.uk. Minutes of the Parish Council meeting held on Tuesday 10th November 2020 This meeting was held remotely via Zoom and all documents had been circulated by e-mail prior to the meeting Present: Cllrs M Newby (Chair), R Naish; D Cooke; V Wilson; M Burton; A Parker; J Goacher; D Cartwright; J Nixon; and Clerk: S Stilliard. Residents: none present Guests: CCllr John Ogle PUBLIC FORUM – none present PLANNING MEETING Apologies for Absence – Cllr C Page Declarations of Interest and Confidentiality – Planning Meeting – none New Applications – none Old Applications awaiting decisions – none Decisions – none Other planning issues SWNP Neighbourhood Plan: The Wheatley Steering Group had a positive meeting and agreed a path forwards, subject to the publication of revised housing figures in Bassetlaw's updated Draft Local Plan. This will be published at the end of the month. Wheatley's figures will almost certainly be lower than the current 20% target due to the rejection of several sites by BDC, even though the Steering Group had approved them on behalf of the village Page 1379 PARISH COUNCIL MEETING 11.20.01. Apologies for Absence – Cllr C Page and DCllr Naish which were accepted by Council 11.20.02. Declarations of Interest and Confidentiality None declared at this stage. 11.20.03. Report from the Chair – agenda issues The Chair gave a vote of thanks to DCllr Naish for producing the latest Covid update leaflet for Sturton Ward and to those who helped to deliver the leaflets.
    [Show full text]
  • Sturton Ward Neighbourhood Plan Review] 2020 - 2037
    Review Version Pre Submission Draft March 2020 Sturton Ward Planning Group 2020-2037 [STURTON WARD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN REVIEW] 2020 - 2037 55 Review version Pre-submission draft May 2020 Sturton Ward Planning Group 2020-2037 PRODUCED BY THE STURTON WARD PLANNING GROUP ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND ORGANISATIONS WITHIN THE THREE PARISHES OF NORTH AND SOUTH WHEATLEY, AND STURTON LE STEEPLE AND NORTH LEVERTON WITH HABBLESTHORPE, TOGETHER WITH THE HAMLETS AND | Foreword Page 1 SETTLEMENTS WITHIN THE WARD [STURTON WARD NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN REVIEW] 2020 - 2037 Table of contents Foreword ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 6 2 Consultation ...................................................................................................................................... 11 3 What is special about Sturton Ward? ........................................................................................... 12 4 Sturton Ward today: challenges and opportunities .................................................................... 15 5 Community vision ............................................................................................................................ 18 6 Community objectives ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]