DOCSLIB.ORG

The Wannsee Protocol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 Primary Source 13.3 WANNSEE PROTOCOL, JANUARY 20, 1942 On January 20, 1942, fifteen senior Nazi officials met in the Berlin suburb of Wannsee. Present were representatives of the foreign office; the justice, interior, and state ministries; and the SS—the brutal paramilitary organization concerned with internal affairs. The meeting was headed by Reinhard Heydrich (1904–42), director of the SS secret police, the Gestapo. The Wannsee Conference was to coordinate the ministries involved in the “Final Solution to the Jewish Question,” that is, the deportation and extermination of all the Jews in Europe. The killing of Jews had already begun with the invasion of Poland in September of 1939. Death squads of the SS, Einsatzgruppen, executed insurgents, educated elites, nobles, priests, and Jews. During the course of the war, they killed roughly 2 million people, including 1.3 million Jews. However, squads of executioners would take a long time to annihilate the millions of Jews spread throughout Europe, and the Nazis were in a rush. The war had accelerated at the end of 1941, as the USSR went on the offensive, and the Pearl Harbor attack had pushed the U.S. into the war. Moreover, individual Nazi officials in the Baltic States and Eastern Poland, on their own initiative but sure of finding favor in Berlin, began the mass murder of whole Jewish communities, including women and children. Then, in September 1941 at Auschwitz, 600 Soviet POWs were put to death using the insecticide Zyclon-B. Ultimately, in six death camps (all in Nazi-occupied Polish territory: Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, Majdanek, and Auschwitz-Birkenau) some 3 million Jews and many tens of thousands of Gypsies, or Roma, and other non-Jews perished. This was only a fraction of the 11 million prisoners (including up to 6 million Jews) who died in thousands of Nazi camps during the war. Even when military retreat forced the abandonment of the killing centers, merciless Nazi guards marched hundreds of thousands of prisoners westward for further use as slave labor; up to one-third died in transit. Although Heydrich ordered the Wannsee Conference minutes destroyed, one copy was found in 1947. It is transcribed below. For the text online, click here. Stamp: Top Secret 30 copies 16th copy Minutes of discussion. I. The following persons took part in the discussion aBout the final solution of the Jewish question which took place in Berlin, am Grossen Wannsee No. 56/58 on 20 January 1942. Gauleiter1 Dr. Meyer2 and Reich Ministry for the Occupied 1 A regional Nazi party leader. 2 Reichsamtleiter Dr. LeibBrandt3 Eastern territories Secretary of State Dr. Stuckart4 Reich Ministry for the Interior Secretary of State Neumann5 Plenipotentiary6 for the Four Year Plan Secretary of State Dr. Freisler7 Reich Ministry of Justice Secretary of State Dr. Bühler8 Office of the Government General9 Under Secretary of State Dr. Luther10 Foreign Office SS-Oberführer11 Klopfer12 Party Chancellery Ministerialdirektor Kritzinger13 Reich Chancellery SS-Gruppenführer14 Hofmann15 Race and Settlement Main Office SS-Gruppenführer Müller16 Reich Main Security Office SS-OBersturmbannführer17 Eichmann18 2 Alfred Meyer (1891–1945), Deputy Reichminister in the Reich Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories. He committed suicide at the end of the war. Most of the “doctor” participants were PhDs, not MDs. 3 Georg LeiBBrandt (1899–1982), a Nazi politician and theoretician who survived the war and moved to America. 4 Wilhelm Stuckart (1902–53) was a lawyer and official of the Nazi party and was sentenced to time served during the NuremBerg Trials. 5 Erich Neumann (1892–1948), a Nazi official, was arrested By the Allies then released in 1948 due to poor health. 6 An official with complete power or authority in a specific area. 7 Roland Freisler (1893–1945), a Nazi lawyer and judge; killed in a BomBing raid in 1945. 8 Josef Bühler (1904–48), a deputy governor to the General Government, executed in 1948 By the Supreme National TriBunal of Poland for crimes against humanity. 9 The administrative body of Nazi occupied Poland, from 1939 to 1945. 10 Martin Franz Julius Luther (1895–1945) was imprisoned in 1943 for disagreements with his superiors. LiBerated By Soviet troops in 1945, he soon died of a heart attack. 11 A rank in Both the SA and SS meaning “senior leader” which came to Be regarded as equal to senior colonel rank. 12 Gerhard Klopfer (1905–1987), a Nazi and assistant to Martin Bormann (1900–45), head of the Party Chancellery. He was charged with war crimes But acquitted for lack of evidence. 13 Friedrich Wilhelm Kritzinger (1890–1947), the representative of the Reich Chancellery was convicted of war crimes and died in NuremBerg. 14 A rank in the SA and SS “group leader,” equivalent to the military rank of lieutenant general. 15 Otto Hofmann (1896–1982), a Nazi official, sentenced to 25 years in prison for war crimes. 16 Heinrich Müller (B. 1900) was an official of the Gestapo, thought to have died in 1945 But without confirmation. 17 A rank in the SA and SS, equivalent to lieutenant colonel in the German Army. 18 Adolf Eichmann (1906–62), one of the major organizers of the Holocaust; caught by Israeli intelligence service, Mossad, in Argentina in 1960, he was tried and hanged. 3 SS-Oberführer Dr. Schöngarth19 Security Police and SD20 Commander of the Security Police and the SD in the Government General SS-Sturmbannführer21 Dr. Lange22 Security Police and SD Commander of the Security Police and the SD for the General-District Latvia, as deputy of the Commander of the Security Police and the SD for the Reich Commissariat “Eastland”. II. At the Beginning of the discussion Chief of the Security Police and of the SD, SS- Obergruppenführer Heydrich, reported that the Reich Marshal23 had appointed him delegate for the preparations for the final solution of the Jewish question in Europe and pointed out that this discussion had Been called for the purpose of clarifying fundamental questions. The wish of the Reich Marshal to have a draft sent to him concerning organizational, factual and material interests in relation to the final solution of the Jewish question in Europe makes necessary an initial common action of all central offices immediately concerned with these questions in order to Bring their general activities into line. The Reichsführer-SS24 and the Chief of the German Police (Chief of the Security Police and the SD) was entrusted with the official central handling of the final solution of the Jewish question without regard to geographic Borders. The Chief of the Security Police and the SD then gave a short report of the struggle which has been carried on thus far against this enemy, the essential points Being the following: a) The expulsion of the Jews from every sphere of life of the German people, b) The expulsion of the Jews from the living space of the German people. In carrying out these efforts, an increased and planned acceleration of the emigration of the Jews from Reich territory was started, as the only possible present solution. By order of the Reich Marshal, a Reich Central Office for Jewish Emigration was set up in January 1939 and the Chief of the Security Police and SD was entrusted with the management. Its most important tasks were 19 Karl EBerhard Schöngarth (1903–46), an official of the SS. He was found guilty of war crimes and hanged. 20 The Sicherheitsdienst, or SD, was the intelligence agency of the SS. 21 Obergruppenführer was the highest rank in the SS, second only to Reichsführer Himmler. 22 Rudolf Lange (1910–45), commander of the SD in Latvia. 23 As reichmarschall, Hermann Göring (1893–1946) was senior to all commanders in the German Army. Göring gave Heyrdrich the order in 1941 to find a total solution to the Jewish question. 24 The Reichsführer-SS was the highest rank of the SS, held By Heinrich Himmler (1900–45) from 1929 to 1945. 4 a) To make all necessary arrangements for the preparation for an increased emigration of the Jews, B) To direct the flow of emigration, c) To speed the procedure of emigration in each individual case. The aim of all this was to cleanse German living space of Jews in a legal manner. All the offices realized the drawBacks of such enforced accelerated emigration. For the time being they had, however, tolerated it on account of the lack of other possible solutions of the proBlem. The work concerned with emigration was, later on, not only a German proBlem, But also a proBlem with which the authorities of the countries to which the flow of emigrants was Being directed would have to deal. Financial difficulties, such as the demand By various foreign governments for increasing sums of money to Be presented at the time of the landing, the lack of shipping space, increasing restriction of entry permits, or the cancelling of such, increased extraordinarily the difficulties of emigration. In spite of these difficulties, 537,000 Jews were sent out of the country Between the takeover of power and the deadline of 31 October 1941. Of these approximately 360,000 were in Germany proper on 30 January 1933 approximately 147,000 were in Austria (Ostmark) on 15 March 1939 approximately 30,000 were in the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia25 on 15 March 1939. The Jews themselves, or their Jewish political organizations, financed the emigration. In order to avoid impoverished Jews’ remaining Behind, the principle was followed that wealthy Jews have to finance the emigration of poor Jews; this was arranged By imposing a suitaBle tax, i.e., an emigration tax, which was used for financial arrangements in connection with the emigration of poor Jews and was imposed according to income.
Recommended publications

  • Armenian Genocide and the Jewish Holocaust: from Impunity to Retributive Justice*

    The Historical and Legal Interconnections Between the Armenian Genocide and the Jewish Holocaust: From Impunity to Retributive Justice* Vahakn N. Dadrian I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 504 II. THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND AND AFTERMATH OF THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE ............... 507 A. Outlines of the Problem .......................................................................... 507 B. Conflict in the U.S. Government Regarding the Lausanne Treaty ........................ 511 M. COMPARATIVE ASPECTS OF THE TwO CASES ........................................................... 517 A. The Historical Vulnerability of the Jews and Armenians to Victimization ............... 517 B. The Factorsof Power and Opportunity........................................................ 519 C. Strategiesfor Taking Advantage of the Opportunity Structure ............................ 521 1. The Use of Wartime Emergency Powers by the Executive ......................... 521 2. The Role of PoliticalParties ........................................................... 524 3. Trial Balloons ............................................................................. 529 IV. THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE AS A PRECEDENT AND A PRECURSOR OF THE HOLOCAUST ........... 531 A. Nazi Germany's Knowledge of the Fate of the Armenians ................................. 532 B. Hitler'sAppreciation of the Armenian Genocide............................................. 537 C. The Legacy of Genghis Kum as a Functional
  • HBO and the HOLOCAUST: CONSPIRACY, the HISTORICAL FILM, and PUBLIC HISTORY at WANNSEE Nicholas K. Johnson Submitted to the Facul

    HBO and the HOLOCAUST: CONSPIRACY, the HISTORICAL FILM, and PUBLIC HISTORY at WANNSEE Nicholas K. Johnson Submitted to the Facul

    HBO AND THE HOLOCAUST: CONSPIRACY, THE HISTORICAL FILM, AND PUBLIC HISTORY AT WANNSEE Nicholas K. Johnson Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of History, Indiana University December 2016 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee __________________________________ Raymond J. Haberski, Ph.D., Chair __________________________________ Thorsten Carstensen, Ph.D. __________________________________ Kevin Cramer, Ph.D. ii Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank the members of my committee for supporting this project and offering indispensable feedback and criticism. I would especially like to thank my chair, Ray Haberski, for being one of the most encouraging advisers I have ever had the pleasure of working with and for sharing his passion for film and history with me. Thorsten Carstensen provided his fantastic editorial skills and for all the times we met for lunch during my last year at IUPUI. I would like to thank Kevin Cramer for awakening my interest in German history and for all of his support throughout my academic career. Furthermore, I would like to thank Jason M. Kelly, Claudia Grossmann, Anita Morgan, Rebecca K. Shrum, Stephanie Rowe, Modupe Labode, Nancy Robertson, and Philip V. Scarpino for all the ways in which they helped me during my graduate career at IUPUI. I also thank the IUPUI Public History Program for admitting a Germanist into the Program and seeing what would happen. I think the experiment paid off.
  • "Es War Nicht Nur Ein Verwaltungsmord". Obwaldner

    "Es War Nicht Nur Ein Verwaltungsmord". Obwaldner

    19.01.2017 «Es war nicht nur ein Verwaltungsmord» Heute ist das Haus der Wannseekonferenz eine Gedenkstätte. | Bild: Oliver Weiken/EPA (Berlin, 19. Januar 2017) HOLOCAUST ⋅ Vor 75 Jahren trafen sich hochrangige Nazi-Funktionäre, um den Massenmord an den Juden zu organisieren. Der Direktor der Gedenkstätte Haus der Wannseekonferenz spricht im Interview darüber, was Besucher an dem Tatort heute lernen können. Interview: Isabelle Daniel Hans-Christian Jasch, vielen erscheint es so, als sei der Holocaust binnen 11/2 Stunden am Wannsee beschlossen worden. Das entspricht natürlich nicht der historischen Realität, sondern dem Bedürfnis, dass man ein Zivilisationsverbrechen wie den Holocaust mit einem konkreten Termin und Ort für die Entscheidung, die dazu führte, verbinden können will. Die historischen Ereignisse sind komplexer. Es gab eine Kette von Entscheidungen, die nicht alle top-down-gesteuert waren. Es hat auch das gegeben, was Ian Kershaw das «dem Führer entgegenarbeiten» nennt. Zum Zeitpunkt der Wannseekonferenz befand sich der Massenmord im Osten in vollem Gange. Seit Herbst 1941 rollten die Züge aus dem Reich und aus der sogenannten Ostmark in die Ghettos im Osten. Am 19. Januar 1942 hatte der neunte Transport Berlin verlassen. Das zeigt, dass die Wannseekonferenz im Kontext eines sich ausbreitenden Vernichtungsgeschehens stattfand. Welche Bedeutung hatte die Wannseekonferenz in diesem Kontext? Es kommt ihr schon eine wichtige Bedeutung zu, weil sie die Organisation und den rechtlichen Rahmen für die Definition des Opferkreises und das weitere Vorgehen im Reich und in Westeuropa festlegte. Heydrich ging es darum, seine und Himmlers Federführung festzuklopfen. Aber es ging auch darum, zu definieren, wer alles deportiert und ermordet werden sollte, etwa wenn es um sogenannte Mischlinge ging.
  • LATVIJA NACISTISKĀS VĀCIJAS OKUPĀCIJAS VARĀ, 1941–1945 1 2 Nacistiskās Vācijas Okupācijas Politika Latvijā: Avoti Un Historiogrāfija 3

    LATVIJA NACISTISKĀS VĀCIJAS OKUPĀCIJAS VARĀ, 1941–1945 1 2 Nacistiskās Vācijas Okupācijas Politika Latvijā: Avoti Un Historiogrāfija 3

    LATVIJAS VĒSTURNIEKU KOMISIJAS RAKSTI 11. sējums LATVIJA NACISTISKĀS VĀCIJAS OKUPĀCIJAS VARĀ, 1941–1945 1 2 Nacistiskās Vācijas okupācijas politika Latvijā: avoti un historiogrāfija 3 Latvijas Vēsturnieku komisijas raksti 11. sējums Symposium of the Commission of the Historians of Latvia Volume 11 2 Nacistiskās Vācijas okupācijas politika Latvijā: avoti un historiogrāfija 3 Latvijas Vēsturnieku komisija Latvijas Universitātes Latvijas vēstures institūts Latvijas Universitātes Vēstures un filozofijas fakultāte LATVIJA NACISTISKĀS VĀCIJAS OKUPĀCIJAS VARĀ 1941–1945 Starptautiskās konferences referāti 2003. gada 12.–13. jūnijs, Rīga LATVIA UNDER NAZI GERMAN OCCUPATION 1941–1945 Materials of an International Conference 12–13 June 2003, Riga Latvijas vēstures institūta apgāds Rīga 2004 4UDK 94(474.3)“1941/1945”(063) Nacistiskās Vācijas okupācijas politika Latvijā: avoti un historiogrāfija 5 La 804 Redakcijas kolēģija Dr. habil. hist., prof. ANDRIS CAUNE (atbildīgais redaktors), Dr. habil. hist., prof. INESIS FELDMANIS, Dr. habil. hist., prof. emeritus HEINRIHS STRODS, Dr. hist. IRĒNE ŠNEIDERE Sastādītājs Dr. hist. DZINTARS ĒRGLIS Redaktores RITA KĻAVIŅA, VIJA STABULNIECE Korektore BRIGITA VĀRPA Māksliniece INĀRA JĒGERE Datormaketētāja MARGARITA STOKA Grāmata izdota par Latvijas Vēsturnieku komisijas finansiālajiem līdzekļiem ISBN 9984–601–55–2 © Latvijas Universitātes Latvijas vēstures institūts, 2004 4 Nacistiskās Vācijas okupācijas politika Latvijā: avoti un historiogrāfija 5 SATURS Priekšvārds . 9 Latvijas Republikas Valsts prezidentes Vairas
  • How Much Did the Germans Know About the Final Solution?: an Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich

    How Much Did the Germans Know About the Final Solution?: an Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich

    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College Spring 2010 How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich Issa A. Braman Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses Part of the Holocaust and Genocide Studies Commons Recommended Citation Braman, Issa A., "How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich" (2010). Honors Theses. 3371. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3371 This Honors Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Honors College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How Much Did the Germans Know about the Final Solution?: An Examination of Propaganda in the Third Reich by Melissa A. Braman In 1925, while Adolf Hitler was serving a short sentence in jail for his failed Beer Hall Putsch, he wrote in Mein Kampf, “With the year 1915 enemy propaganda began in our country, after 1916 it became more and more intensive till finally, at the beginning of the year 1918, it swelled to a positive flood.” Hitler, a soldier of World War I, had experienced firsthand the power of propaganda during the war. With the failure of Germany to counter-act the Allied propaganda, Hitler noted, “The army gradually learned to think as the enemy wanted it to.”1 Hitler applied this same concept to promoting the rhetoric of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP).
  • Das Reichsministerium Des Innern Unter Heinrich Himmler 1943–1945

    Das Reichsministerium Des Innern Unter Heinrich Himmler 1943–1945

    639 Der Name Himmler wird gemeinhin mit der SS in Verbindung gebracht wie über- haupt mit dem nationalsozialistischen Terrorapparat, mit dem Holocaust und dem ideo- logischen Kern der NS-Bewegung. Weniger bekannt ist dagegen, dass Himmler – neben vielem anderen – auch noch den Posten des Reichsinnenministers übernahm, wenn auch erst spät, im Jahr 1943. Welche Folgen ergaben sich aus dieser Zäsur und vor allem: welche Konsequenzen hatte das für dieses Ressort? Stephan Lehnstaedt Das Reichsministerium des Innern unter Heinrich Himmler 1943–1945 Als Heinrich Himmler am 26. August 1943 neuer Reichs- und Preußischer Mini- ster des Innern wurde1, löste er mit Wilhelm Frick einen nationalsozialistischen Minister der ersten Stunde ab. Schon 1933 war der promovierte Jurist von Hitler ernannt worden und hatte dem Reichskabinett über zehn Jahre angehört. In sein Ressort fielen nicht nur die Innenverwaltung, sondern auch die Polizeigewalt und die Aufsicht über das Gesundheitswesen, das ein eigenes Staatssekretariat im Ministerium bildete. Mit diesen Kompetenzen konnte Frick die Rechtsetzung maßgeblich beeinflussen und für den nationalsozialistischen Staat so wichtige Richtlinien wie die Erbgesundheitsgesetze und die Nürnberger Rassengesetze federführend gestalten. Zu Fricks anfänglich recht bedeutsamer Stellung trug auch die Übernahme des Preußischen Innenministeriums 1934 im Zuge der Beseitigung der Länderhoheit bei, so dass ab diesem Augenblick die vollständige Weisungshoheit für die Landes- und Kommunalbehörden in seiner Hand war. Ferner sorgte
  • Steinerne Ränder Gesellschaftlicher Umbrüche. Grabsteine Und Todeszeichen in Der Bukowina Zwischen 1900 Und 1941

    Steinerne Ränder Gesellschaftlicher Umbrüche. Grabsteine Und Todeszeichen in Der Bukowina Zwischen 1900 Und 1941

    Katharina Haberkorn Steinerne Ränder gesellschaftlicher Umbrüche. Grabsteine und Todeszeichen in der Bukowina zwischen 1900 und 1941. Dissertation 2017 Andrássy Universität Budapest Interdisziplinäre Doktorschule Leiterin der Doktorschule: Prof. Dr. Ellen Bos Autorin: Katharina Haberkorn Titel: Steinerne Ränder gesellschaftlicher Umbrüche. Grabsteine und Todeszeichen in der Bukowina zwischen 1900 und 1941. Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Dieter Anton Binder Disputationskommission: Prof. Dr. István Fehér PD Dr. Heidemarie Uhl Jun.-Prof. Dr. Maren Röger Prof. Dr. Ibolya Murber Dr. Richard Lein Dr. Henriett Kovács Eingereicht am 25.08.2017 INHALT Vorwort ..................................................................................................................................... i Rose Ausländer .................................................................................................................. i 1 Einleitung .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Einführung und Fragestellungen .............................................................................. 1 1.1.1 Zugang und Struktur ............................................................................................. 5 1.1.2 Todeszeichen - Steinerne Ränder ........................................................................ 7 1.2 Forschungsstand .................................................................................................... 13 1.2.1 In Teilen erleuchtet ...........................................................................................
  • Reichskommissariat Ostland from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Reichskommissariat Ostland from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia

    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Reichskommissariat Ostland From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia "Ostland" redirects here. For the province of the Empire in Warhammer 40,000, see Ostland (Warhammer). Navigation Reichskommissariat Ostland (RKO) was the civilian occupation regime established by Main page Germany in the Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), the north-eastern part of Reichskommissariat Ostland Contents Poland and the west part of the Belarusian SSR during World War II. It was also known Reichskommissariat of Germany Featured content [1] initially as Reichskommissariat Baltenland ("Baltic Land"). The political organization Current events ← → for this territory—after an initial period of military administration before its establishment— 1941–1945 Random article was that of a German civilian administration, nominally under the authority of the Reich Donate to Wikipedia Ministry for the Occupied Eastern Territories (German: Reichsministerium für die besetzten Ostgebiete) led by Nazi ideologist Alfred Rosenberg, but was in reality Interaction controlled by the Nazi official Hinrich Lohse, its appointed Reichskommissar. Help The main political objective, which the ministry laid out in the framework of National Flag Emblem About Wikipedia Socialist policies for the east established by Adolf Hitler, were the complete annihilation Community portal of the Jewish population and the settlement of ethnic Germans along with the expulsion or Recent changes Germanization of parts of the native population
  • Valdis Lūmans on Latvians and the Holocaust in Occupied Latvia: Disillusionment Begets Myth Supplanting Myth

    Valdis Lūmans on Latvians and the Holocaust in Occupied Latvia: Disillusionment Begets Myth Supplanting Myth

    Valdis Lūmans on Latvians and the Holocaust in Occupied Latvia: Disillusionment Begets Myth Supplanting Myth Latvia in World War II by Valdis O. Lūmans Volume 11 of World War II, ISSN 1541-0293 Issue 11 of World War II—the global, human, and ethical dimension, ISSN 1541-0293 Fordham University Press, 2006. ISBN 0823226271, 9780823226276 Peters Vecrumba LATVIANS.COM [email protected] INTRODUCTION Latvians, whatever lands you may come to,—proclaim the name of Latvia! Never and nowhere in your life will you ever hear a more beautiful word than this word; who- ever of you carries this word forth, shirk not, therefore, from spreading it far and wide; cease not to praise our country—Fathers, inculcate it into your children; Mothers, sing of it by your chil- dren’s and grand-children’s cribs; but, if you are a child born in exile,—relent not in ceaselessly questioning your parents about this land. Let Latvia be in your thoughts and imaginings as a distant, beautiful island in the sea of the world; as you sail your course through life, keep your prow ever pointed towards it. Day or night, dusk or dawn,—keep it in your thoughts, utter its name, fall in love with it ever more passionate- ly! — Author and artist Jānis Jaunsudrabiņš (1877–1962), my translation In reference to the Holocaust literature in Eastern Europe, especially that of Germany, there is an overuse of the concept of collaboration, which had its origins in Western Europe and Scandi- navia. Every second article written by a German scholar about Eastern Europe, has the word collaboration in it.
  • Introduction

    Introduction

    Introduction THE PARTICIPANTS The Men of the Wannsee Conference Hans-Christian Jasch and Christoph Kreutzmüller On 20 January 1942 senior German officials came together for a meet- ing, to be followed by breakfast, in a grand villa overlooking Lake Wannsee to discuss the “Final Solution to the Jewish Question”1 in Europe. What sort of men were they? This is what most visitors to the House of the Wannsee Conference Memorial and Educational Site ask themselves when they visit the former dining room where the meeting very likely took place.2 This volume sets out to provide answers. Inevitably, they will not be exhaustive answers. While the Wannsee Conference has come to be seen as key (and sometimes even as a cipher) to the bureaucratically orchestrated mass murder of European Jews, its participants have not.3 The fifteen men who attended the Wannsee Conference will be profiled in this volume in readable, concise chapters based on primary sources and intense research. Our goal is to convey a distinct sense of these men with in-depth biographical detail, associations and references. We hope that our volume will contribute to research into Nazi perpetrators,4 which has been a valuable addition to Holocaust research and is a cen- tral element of the Memorial’s educational agenda.5 We also hope the volume provides a glimpse into the private and professional networks of the officials who worked in the offices on Berlin’s Wilhelmstraße and whom research has so far neglected.6 Who were the conference participants? We must start by stating the obvious: there were no women among them.
  • Reinhard Heydrich Adolf Eichmann Friedrich Wilhelm

    Reinhard Heydrich Adolf Eichmann Friedrich Wilhelm

    DESTINI 1941 , INIZIO DELL’ESTATE. Gen. SS Reinhard Heydrich (1904-1942) Comandante del RSHA e del SD, Protettore del La Seconda Guerra Mondiale è cominciata da Reich in Boemia e Moravia. Morì il 4 giugno 1942, Lorenzo Corengia meno di due anni e l’Europa è stata a 38 anni, in un attentato della Resistenza, a conquistata quasi per intero dalle armate REINHARD HEYDRICH Praga. Dopo la sua morte, per rappresaglia tedesche. La bandiera con la croce uncinata furono uccisi migliaia di civili nella sventola su Parigi, Bruxelles, Amsterdam, Oslo, cittadina ceca di Liditz (Lidice). Copenaghen, Vienna, Belgrado, Atene, Praga, Ten. Col. SS-Gestapo Adolf Eichmann (1906-1962) Varsavia. Capo dell’Ufficio IV-B-4 (Affari ebraici) del RSHA. Solo la Gran Bretagna continua a Fuggì nel 1945 nascondendosi in Argentina; nel combattere contro Germania e Italia, mentre Emiliano Zatelli 1960 fu riconosciuto e rapito da agenti del già dal settembre del 1940 il patto tra le Mossad. Processato e condannato a morte a potenze dell’Asse si è allargato al Giappone. ADOLF EICHMANN Gerusalemme, venne impiccato il 31 maggio 1962, a 56 anni, e fu cremato. Le sue ceneri vennero Il 22 giugno l’esercito tedesco attacca a disperse in mare al di là delle acque sorpresa l’Unione Sovietica: in meno di sei mesi territoriali dello Stato di Israele. le armate di Hitler sono alle porte di Mosca. I Segr. St. Friedrich W. Kritzinger (1890-1947) nazisti dominano l’Europa dalla Francia Giuliano Gariboldi Direttore della Cancelleria del Reich. all’Uc raina, e nulla sembra poterli fermare. Imprigionato nel 1946, rilasciato per motivi di Con l’invasione dell’URSS inizia in modo FRIEDRICH WILHELM KRITZINGER salute, morì nel 1947.
  • ROLL 1 NSDAP Hauptparteileitung, Ed., Nationalsozialistisches

    ROLL 1 NSDAP Hauptparteileitung, Ed., Nationalsozialistisches

    Roll List for Berlin Document Center Library Collection, A3345-B- ROLL 1 NSDAP Hauptparteileitung, ed., Nationalsozialistisches Jahrbuch (National Socialist Yearbook). This roll covers: 1927 (frames 6-108); 1928 (frames 109-209); 1932 (frames 211-366); 1933 (frames 384-569); 1934 (frames 570-845); 1935 (frames 847- 1055. Reichsleiter Philipp Bouhler became editor in 1934. Contains a wide variety of topics including propaganda, much anti-Semitic material, cultural items, economic issues, education, Fascism, Germans abroad, NSDAP background and organization, legal issues, etc. ROLL 2 Bouhler, Reichsleiter Philipp, ed., Nationalsozialistisches Jahrbuch (National Socialist Yearbook). This roll covers: 1936 (frames 7-205); 1937 (frames 206-407); 1938 (frames 408-637); 1939 (frames 638-893). Dr. Robert Ley, Reichsorganisations- leiter, took over editorship in 1939. Contents as for roll 1, including essays about affiliated organizations, the Schwarze Korps, the Auslandsorganisation, etc. ROLL 3 Ley, Reichsorganisationsleiter Dr. Robert, Nationalsozialistisches Jahrbuch (National Socialist Yearbook). This roll covers: 1940 (frames 9-288); 1942 (frames 289-557); 1943 (frames 558-763); 1944 (frames 764-928). Topics similar to above rolls, with the addition of foreign affairs, occupied territories, military affairs, labor and war. Gehl, Walther, Der deutsche Aufbruch (The German Awakening), 1941. A six part history of the "German awakening" from 1918-1941, on frames 929-1028. ROLL 4 Gehl, Walther, ed., Die Jahre I-IV des Nationalsozialistischen Staates (Years I-IV of the National Socialist State), 1936. Book includes lists of persons, subject matter and illustrations on frames 10-29 and 30-38; ends at frame 451. Gehl, Walther, ed., Der Nationalsozialistische Staat (The National Socialist State), 1936.