Three Battles of the Texas Revolution (The Alamo, Goliad, and San Jacinto)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Three Battles of the Texas Revolution (The Alamo, Goliad, and San Jacinto) Three Battles of the Texas Revolution (The Alamo, Goliad, and San Jacinto) The region of Tejas (Texas), a province of Mexico, was the scene of mounting tensions during the late 1820s and early 1830s. Increasing numbers of United States citizens flooded across the border into Mexico to lay claim to the land prime for growing cotton that was west of the Sabine River. The American settlers rebelled against Mexican rule and began a movement for independence. The Mexican government, which had gained its independence from Spain 1821, refused to give in to the growing foreign presence, and in the fall of 1835 a full-scale rebellion erupted at the town of Gonzales. Later that year, in December, Benjamin Milam led a combined force of Tejanos, Spanish-speaking native residents of Tejas, and Texans, English-speaking residents of Tejas, against a Mexican military unit in San Antonio. The fighting was extremely bitter. Each block and building of the city was contested. In the end, the Mexican commander, General Marín Perfecto de Cós, was forced to surrender and Milam’s soldiers occupied the former mission site at the Alamo. Over the next two months, the occupying forces worked to strengthen the Alamo's defenses, but were surprised on February 23, 1836 to see the 2,000-man Mexican army under the command of General Santa Anna looming on the horizon. At this time, only 155 soldiers manned the Tejas stronghold. The Commanding officer of the forces at the Alamo, William Travis, decided to hold out until reinforcements could be brought in. Several scouts managed to slip though the Mexican siege line to carry word of the Alamo defenders' plight to other Texas communities. The response to the plea for help was moderate. The Texas independence movement was badly fragmented because of personal rivalries and widespread confusion. By March 1, only 32 volunteers had been sent by the neighboring community of Gonzales to help those defending the Alamo. Santa Anna’s forces had encircled the Alamo and had begun to reduce its walls using artillery fire. Conditions within the old mission deteriorated rapidly. Food and ammunition ran low. At sunrise on March 6, Mexican soldiers began an assault on the walls of the Alamo. Initially the Texans resisted the attack successfully, but due to the overwhelming numerical advantage of the Mexican army, Santa Anna’s army eventually managed to get some of its soldiers over the walls and into the fort. The battle turned into a rout when the Mexicans captured the Alamo’s sole cannon and turned its fire on the Texan defenders. The last-ditch Texan strongholds — a church and barracks — were destroyed and hand-to-hand fighting ensued. By the end of the day, the 187 Texan rebels were dead and only a few civilians were spared to carry word of the great Mexican victory to the outside world. Included among the dead were Travis and such notables as James Bowie and Davy Crockett. This event, which nearly coincided with the Goliad Massacre, helped to galvanize the Texas Independence movement. Formerly divided leaders now joined in a common cause, realizing that only united action would achieve their end. Six weeks later — under the cry of “Remember the Alamo” — Texan forces won a stunning and decisive victory at San Jacinto. Goliad was a small community located on the banks of the San Antonio River in the far northern Mexican province of Tejas. Goliad was one of only three Mexican settlements in the area; the others were San Antonio and Nacogdoches. In the 1820s, increasing migration of American citizens across the Sabine River into Mexican territory was the cause of much friction. Conditions deteriorated further when the foreigners became more independent and clashed with Mexican officials. General Antonio López de Santa Anna, the President of Mexico, desired an end to repeated violations of Mexican sovereignty in which U.S. citizens would cross the border to offer armed support to friends and relatives living in Tejas. In February 1836, Mexican General José de Urrea captured a number of U.S. citizens at the village of San Patricio, but declined to follow the execution order issued by Santa Anna. A few weeks later, Urrea captured 33 Americans at Nuestra Señora del Refugio. Some of his prisoners had participated in an ambush that resulted in the loss of several Mexican lives. On this occasion, Urrea followed his instructions by executing 15 foreigners, but sparing non-U.S. citizens in the party. At about this time, Texan forces under Colonel James Fannin took possession of neighboring Goliad from a small Mexican unit. Then Urrea's army appeared; the Texans fled from Goliad, but were quickly trapped by the superior Mexican force. Fannin entered into negotiation on behalf of his party of nearly 350 men, asking that his soldiers be treated as prisoners of war in accordance with established international standards. Urrea was again in a bind; his orders from Santa Anna clearly called for the execution of foreign soldiers. In addition, Fannin’s men, while badly outnumbered, were still heavily armed and likely to fight if pressed. In a face- to-face meeting, Urrea persuaded Fannin to surrender in return for Urrea’s support for a petition of leniency. The Texans then gave up their arms and marched back to Goliad, confident that their freedom would be secured in several days. Urrea upheld his end of the bargain and quickly dispatched his support for leniency. Santa Anna, distrustful of Urrea, sent orders to execute the captives directly to the commander of the small garrison at Goliad, effectively bypassing the general. On March 27, 1836, the Texan prisoners were divided into three groups and marched to separate locations outside the community. A signal was given and the heavily armed guards opened fire on the captives; those who survived were bayoneted. The day’s toll was 342 Texan soldiers killed. A few managed to escape and, over several days, find their way back to friendly surroundings. The final engagement of the Texas Revolution was fought where the San Jacinto River flows into Buffalo Bayou (near the present-day city of Houston) on April 21, 1836. Following defeat of Texan forces at the Alamo, the revolutionary fighters retreated eastward to avoid confronting Santa Anna's numerically superior army. Mexican forces were moving to take control of the Gulf coast seaport cities. Political leaders in Texas, as well as many of the soldiers themselves, were displeased about Sam Houston’s lack of initiative. On April 19th, Texan forces took up a position near Buffalo Bayou. The following day, Mexican forces advanced across a plain, but were halted by an artillery barrage from two famous cannon, the Twin Sisters. Then the Texans mounted a cavalry charge that had little impact other than an outstanding display of courage. On April 21st, 750 Texans waited to engage a force of more than 1,500 Mexicans. In the early morning darkness Houston sent out a small force to destroy a nearby bridge. This action cut off any chance of reinforcements for the Mexican army, but also denied the possibility of retreat to both sides. Later in the day, a confident Mexican army took its afternoon siesta without posting sentries. At about 3:30 p.m. the Texans attacked, yelling reminders to themselves to “Remember the Alamo” and “Remember Goliad.” The battle lasted only about 18 minutes. The Mexicans were caught completely by surprise; approximately 630 were killed. Texan losses amounted to nine killed and 30 wounded. The Texan forces confiscated large amounts of the Mexicans' supplies and silver, ending their hopes for retaking their lost province. Santa Ana was captured the following day while hiding near the battlefield. .
Recommended publications
  • Texas As a Province and Republic 1795-1845 Reel Listing
    Texas as a Province and Republic 1795-1845 Reel Listing Advocate of the People's Rights, Brazoria. Alsbury, Horace A., d. 1847. Extra. Brazoria, Wednesday, March 27, 1834. To the People of Texas. [Brazoria: Printed at the Office of the Advocate of [Brazoria: Printed by F.C. Gray]. [1835] the People's Rights]. [1834] 53; [Text begins:] Arriving this day from Monterray 42; [Published "for the sole purpose of laying before [sic] ... [continues with] information which I possess the public" a letter from Stephen F. Austin to the in regard to the designs of the Mexican Government Ayuntamiento of San Felipe de Austin dated towards the people of Texas ... [Signed and dated at "Monterry [sic], Jan. 17, 1834.", but including a end:] Horatio A. Alsberry [sic]. Columbia, August number of other items. Text begins:] The present 28th, 1835.; Broadside in two columns. 19.3 x 15.4 Extra closes the career of the "Advocate," until the cm.; This handbill, from which Dr. Barker in Johnson return of Oliver H. Allen, the Editor, who is now and Barker, Texas and Texans, quotes at considerable absent in the U.S. of the North ...; Broadsheet, both length in Vol. I, p. 243, gives a report from Alsbury, sides in three columns. 45.5 x 30 cm.; This is one of just back from Mexico, that the Mexican government the letters written by Austin after his arrest at Saltillo plans to establish an "arbitrary despotism" in Texas, on January 3, 1834, when on his way back to Texas "drive from the country a number of our principal from his mission to Mexico City.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Stewardship Briefings
    Texas Forest Service September 2009 F OREST STEWARDSHIP B RIEFINGS Timber ◊ Wildlife ◊ Water ◊ Soil ◊ Best Management Practices ◊ Forest Health ◊ Recreation ◊ Aesthetics DEFINING WOODY BIOMASS The American Clean Energy and Security When brought before the House floor for Act of 2009 (H.R. 2454) passed the U.S. full consideration by the House of Repre- information from Soci- House of Representatives on June 26, sentatives, more debate resulted in a more ety of American Forest- 2009. It has now moved on to the Senate. open and inclusive definition of biomass ers, Bethesda, MD; plus from private land and a less restrictive other websites Parts of this bill promote commercial de- definition on public land. Specifically on public lands, the word ‘mature’ was re- For more information: ployment of clean, local energy alterna- tives to fossil fuels, and require utilities to moved and ‘late successional’ added in its • http:// supply an increasing percentage of their place - prohibiting removal of biomass www.eforester.org/ demand from renewable sources. from late-successional stands unless the fp/positionstate trees are “dead, badly infested or severely ments.cfm#bioener In the past, both legislative bodies have damaged.” gy passed renewable energy bills that became law. These efforts have included woody The Senate Energy and Natural Resources • http:// biomass as a renewable energy feedstock. Committee has already passed an energy www.govtrack.us/ bill which includes a renewable energy congress/bill.xpd? However, due to concerns about the bill=h111-2454 ‘sustainability’ of biomass, there have been standard and yet another definition of bio- many efforts to limit the type of woody mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University In
    So SI SLAVERY IN THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS THESIS Presented to the Graduate Council of the North Texas State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE By Linda Myers Purcell, B.S. Denton, Texas May, 1982 Purcell, Linda M. Slavery in the Republic of Texas. Master of Science (History), May, 1982, 135 pp., 4 figures, bibliography, 76 titles. Slavery was established in Texas with the first Anglo-American settlement in 1822. The constitution of the Republic of Texas protected slavery as did laws passed by the legislature from 1836 to 1846, and the institution of slavery grew throughout the period. Slaves were given adequate food, clothing, and shelter for survival, and they also managed to develop a separate culture. Masters believed that slaves received humane treatment but nevertheless worried constantly about runaways and slave revolts. The Republic's foreign relations and the annexation question were significantly affected by the institution of slavery. The most important primary sources are compilations of the laws of Texas, tax rolls, and traveler's accounts. The most informative secondary source is Abigail Curlee's unpublished doctoral dissertation, "A Study of Texas Slave Plantations, 1822 to 1865" written at the University of Texas in 1932. 1982 LINDA MYERS PURCELL All Rights Reserved ii i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS....... .... .v Chapter I. SLAVERY PRIOR TO THE REVOLUTION, 1821-1835. 1 II. SLAVERY AS A LEGAL INSTITUTION IN THE REPUBLIC OF TEXAS..... .. ..... 27 III. GROWTH OF THE PECULIAR INSTITUTION...... .44 IV. CONDITIONS OF SERVITUDE AND THE TREATMENT OFFREE BLACKS.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did It Happen? Military Action
    NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ Steps Toward Independence Lesson 2: The Winter of 1835–1836 EESSENTIALSSENTIAL QQUESTIONUESTION Why does conflict develop? Terms to Know transport to carry or move objects from place to place assign to give a task or job to campaign a military operation veto to reject a bill passed by the legislature WWhenhen diddid iitt hhappen?appen? 1835 1836 November 25: December 6: January 14: Texas February: Texas Stephen F. Benjamin authorizes attack on provisional Austin leaves Milam leads Matamoros, government for the United attack on San overriding dissolves States Antonio governor’s veto November 26: December 9: January: Santa Anna and The Grass Fight Mexicans surrender his army enter Texas and takes place San Antonio approach San Antonio Military Action Guiding Question What military victories did the Army of the Marking the People gain in late 1835? Text Among volunteer Texans at San Antonio de Béxar were James 1. Circle the number of Bowie and Juan N. Seguín. Seguín led a company of Tejanos. By forces on the Texas and early November, the Texans numbered over 600. Meanwhile, Mexican sides at San another 100 Mexican soldiers arrived to reinforce General Cós. Now Antonio. there were 750 Mexican troops. The Texans were still outnumbered. On November 25, 1835, Stephen F. Austin left for the United States to seek money and supplies for the Texans. Edward Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom use. classroom for reproduce to is granted Permission Education. © McGraw-Hill Copyright Burleson replaced Austin as commander. Reading Essentials and Study Guide 133 NAME ________________________________________ DATE _____________ CLASS ______ Steps Toward Independence Lesson 2: The Winter of 1835–1836, continued On November 26, a scout, Erastus “Deaf” Smith, reported that Explaining Mexican cavalry, or soldiers on horses, and a mule train were heading to San Antonio.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Summary Lesson 1: the Texas Revolution Begins
    NAME DATE CLASS Chapter Summary Steps Toward Independence Lesson 1: The Texas Revolution Begins • The arrival of General Martín de Cós with more Mexican soldiers worried Texas settlers. As a result, the settlers started committees of correspondence to unify Texans. • The first conflict of the Texas Revolution was the Battle of Gonzales on October 2, 1835. The battle, which was a victory for the Texans, began when Mexican forces tried to take away a cannon located in Gonzales. • After Texan forces took control of Goliad, troops under Stephen F. Austin advanced toward San Antonio and laid siege to the city. • Delegates attending the Consultation of 1835 were divided on whether or not Texas should declare its independence. The Consultation eventually adopted the “Declaration of the People of Texas in General Convention Assembled.” It also formed a provisional government and created the Army of the People under the command of Sam Houston. Lesson 2: The Winter of 1835–1836 • On November 26, 1835, Texan troops attacked a mule train heading toward San Antonio. This battle is known as the “Grass Fight” because the mules were carrying grass to feed Spanish livestock. • Benjamin Milam led a force of men to attack San Antonio. The resulting Battle of San Antonio de Béxar lasted four days. On December 9, 1835, San Antonio fell to the Texans. • The Army of the People included Tejano and African American fighters. After Mexico had gained independence from Spain, Mexico passed a law that declared freed African Americans equals to Anglo American colonists. Because of this decision, many African Americans moved to Texas looking for a better life.
    [Show full text]
  • Empresarios and Tejanos Main Ideas Key Terms and People 1
    DO NOT EDIT--Changes must be made through “File info” CorrectionKey=TX-B Section 4 Empresarios and Tejanos Main Ideas Key Terms and People 1. Under Mexico’s Federal Constitution of 1824, Texas was • Federal Constitution of united with the state of Coahuila. 1824 2. New colonization laws in Mexico allowed empresarios • republic to receive contracts to bring settlers to Texas. • Coahuila y Texas 3. Many Tejanos supported immigration to Texas from the United States, though relations later became strained. • State Colonization Law of 1825 Why It Matters Today • empresarios Texas experienced a population boom in the 1820s and • Green DeWitt 1830s. Use current events sources to find information • Martín de León about areas experiencing population booms around the world today. TEKS: 2D, 2E, 8A, 11A, 11B, 17C, 19A, 19B, 21B, 21C, 21E, 22D The Story Continues The news spread through Texas that the Mexican Congress myNotebook had approved a new constitution. Stephen F. Austin had Use the annotation advised the officials who had written the document, and Bleed Art Guide: tools in your eBook All bleeding art should be extended fullyto to takethe notes on the Erasmo Seguín had represented Texas at the constitutional bleed guide. role of empresarios assembly. Texas farmers had donated corn to cover Seguín’s in Texas and the reactions of Tejanos expenses. The people of Texas had done their part. They now to them. waited to learn how the constitution would affect them. A New Constitution for Mexico Art and Non-Teaching Text Guide: After Mexican leader Agustín de Iturbide lost power, the Mexican peo- Folios, annos, standards, non-bleeding art, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhumation of a Hero, Colonel Ben Milam, Milam Park Renovation, Phase I
    Volume 1995 Article 10 1995 Exhumation of a Hero, Colonel Ben Milam, Milam Park Renovation, Phase I Cynthia L. Tennis Center for Archaeological Research Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Tennis, Cynthia L. (1995) "Exhumation of a Hero, Colonel Ben Milam, Milam Park Renovation, Phase I," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 1995, Article 10. https://doi.org/10.21112/ita.1995.1.10 ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1995/iss1/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exhumation of a Hero, Colonel Ben Milam, Milam Park Renovation, Phase I Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol1995/iss1/10 ··lEA\lB[U[}.\1[At 7rl[ON OlP AtlB[JE1[{Q" ..... COJLONE1L JBJEN A\1[l[lLAtA\1[ A\1[I[ILA\l\\1[IPlA\RII\~ IRJENO,VA\ 7rI[ON .
    [Show full text]
  • October 2015 Sam Houston EC Texas­­ Co-Op Power 19 Sam Houston Electric Cooperative
    SAM HOUSTON ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE Sam Houston EC Celebrates Co-op Month Membership Matters While co-ops operate in many industries and sectors of the economy, seven cooperative principles set us apart from other businesses: voluntary and open membership; democratic member control; member’s economic participation; autonomy and independence; education, training and information; cooperation among cooperatives; and concern for community. Co-ops Are Local “Today, people prefer options and alternatives to ‘big box’ businesses,” said Sam Houston Electric Cooperative Chief Communications Officer Keith Stapleton. “The co-op business model is unique and rooted in our local communities. Co-ops October is National Cooperative Month, and Sam Houston Electric Cooperative help us build a more participatory, – and all co-ops across the U.S. – are celebrating the benefits and values that sustainable, and resilient economy.” cooperatives bring to their members and communities. As your local electric Co-op, we get For the many different types of co-ops in the U.S., it’s the time of year to celebrate to be a part of this community. When what membership truly means. You could be a member of a lot of different places – a we think about membership, we think gym, a 4-H club, a food of the month club – the list goes on and on! But what makes about all of the ways we can give back being a member of a co-op different? to you, our members – and that’s what matters most to us. Electric co-ops The simple answer to that question is that when you are a member of a co-op, you are provide power for many East Texas also an owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Timeline History of the Texas Navy
    Texas Navy Association Historical Article A Time Line History of the Texas Navy The following is a Year by Year account of events in the History of Texas that were relevant to the Texas Navy. 1824 1825 1831 1832 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1850 1857 1865 1952 1955 1958 1970 1973 2005 1824 captain of the schooner Sabine (owned by 1835 Edwin Waller and William H. Wharton) November: Stephen F. Austin asks Mexico’s runs past the Mexican fort at Brazoria, on July 26: Mexican Navy Captain Thomas government to authorize a settlement on the Brazos River, to avoid the export duty “Mexico” Thompson, an Englishman, issues Galveston Island as a base for cotton ship‑ demanded by the fort’s commander. Mexi‑ a proclamation to the citizens of Anáhuac in ments to England, then asked the Mexican can troops fire on the Sabine, but its decks which he threatens to burn the town, ignit‑ congress to authorize a seaport there; no ac‑ were lined with bales of cotton to absorb the ing the hatred of the Gulf Coast citizens that tion would be taken on this request until the musket balls, and the Sabine makes the run results in the seizure of his ship, the Correo following year. down the Brazos to the open Gulf of Mex‑ Mexicano, later that year. ico. Waller and Wharton are arrested for 1825 evading customs, but two other merchant August 27: Colonel James Fannin, who was vessels, the Spica and the Nelson, run the later massacred after surrendering to Santa March 24: The Mexican state of Coahuila y “blockade” before the end of the month.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Catalogue II of the Spanish Collection
    The Calendar is a finding aid that contains summary descriptions of each document found within Catalogue II of the Spanish Collection. Catalogue II describes the correspondence, mission records, empresario contracts, decrees, reports, and proceedings generated by Spanish and Mexican efforts to administer their colonization and land distribution systems in Texas. Each entry includes a date, a description, and a list number through which the document can be located using the Texas General Land Office’s Land Grant Database. How to use the Calendar: Search the Calendar by date and/or description, and note the list number of the document. This number will allow you to search for the document in the Land Grant Database. list number date description Calendar of Catalogue II of the Spanish Collection To search for the digitized copy of the document, click on the link to the Land Grant Database. In the Certificate box, enter List #: followed by the corresponding list number from the Calendar and press search. Please make sure there is a space between “list” and the number sign, and another between the colon and the item number. In the search results, click on the View link to see the summary page, which includes a full description of the item. Revised March 2018 Calendar of Catalogue II of the Spanish Collection The summary page will look like this: Texas General Land Office 1700 N. Congress Avenue, Austin, TX 78701 Phone (512) 463-5277, 1-800-998-GLO TDD (512) 463-5330 Revised March 2018 Calendar of Catalogue II of the Spanish Collection The Calendar Revised March 2018 1768.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 2010 Finals Program
    One Hundred and Eighty-First FINAL EXERCISES The Lawn May 23, 2010 The University of Virginia is grateful to the Fort Lee Army Band, under the direction of Chief Warrant Officer William S. McCulloch, for its participation in Final Exercises. Contents Finals Speaker, ii Finals Program, iii A History of Final Exercises, iv The Academic Procession, v Board of Visitors and Administration, vi Faculty Marshals and Finals Committee, vii Graduates and Degree Candidates * School of Medicine, 1 School of Law, 1 School of Engineering & Applied Science, 3 Curry School of Education, 7 Darden Graduate School of Business Administration, 11 School of Architecture, 12 School of Nursing, 13 McIntire School of Commerce, 14 School of Continuing & Professional Studies, 16 Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy, 17 Graduate School of Arts & Sciences, 17 College of Arts & Sciences, 22 Student and Faculty Awards, 33 Honorary Societies, 34 Locations of Final Exercises and Diploma Ceremonies, 36 Maps, inside back cover The Good Old Song, outside back cover * The degree candidates listed in this program were applicants for degrees as of May 14, 2010. The deans of the University’s schools will make any needed changes in awarding the diplomas. The August 2009 and December 2009 degree recipients precede the listing of the May 2010 degree candidates in each section. © 2010 by the Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia Printing by University of Virginia Printing and Copying Services i Finals Speaker John T. Casteen III John Casteen has served as the president of the University and Kaufman Professor since 1990. He joined the faculty in 1975 as an assistant professor of English, became an associate professor in 1977, and continued in that position until 1985.
    [Show full text]
  • The Colonization of Texas: 1820-1830
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1940 The Colonization of Texas: 1820-1830 Eugene A. Gittinger Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Gittinger, Eugene A., "The Colonization of Texas: 1820-1830" (1940). Master's Theses. 191. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/191 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1940 Eugene A. Gittinger -I 7 THE COLONIZATION OF TEXAS 1820 1830 by Eugene A. Gittinger, S.M. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Loyola University 1 9 4 0 PREFACE The colonization of Texas was part of the greater westward movement of the people of the United States. Frederick Jackson Turner has significantly pointed out that "American Histery has been in a large degree the history of colonization of the Great West." It was while studying and observing this great western movement that I became interested in learning more of that movement in the particular region of Texas. This field of study has been plowed and culti­ vated by well known historians, George P. Garrison, Herbert E. Bolton, and especially Eugene c. Barker. Many others, too numerous to mention, have added their share of research but rich fields are still to be found.
    [Show full text]