FSD2653 Finnish National Election Study 2011 Codebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

FSD2653 Finnish National Election Study 2011 Codebook FSD2653 Finnish National Election Study 2011 Codebook FINNISH SOCIAL SCIENCE DATA ARCHIVE The bibliographic citation for this codebook: Finnish National Election Study 2011 [codebook]. Finnish Social Science Data Archive [pro- ducer and distributor], 2020. This codebook has been generated from the version 4.0 (28.10.2020) of the data. Finnish Social Science Data Archive FIN-33014 University of Tampere FSD User Services: asiakaspalvelu.fsd@uta.fi +358 40 190 1442 Aila Data Service Portal: https://services.fsd.uta.fi/ Finnish Social Science Data Archive http://www.fsd.uta.fi/en/ $ Koodikirjoitin.py v37 @ 2020-11-10 16:04:38.424000 $ To the reader This codebook is part of the data FSD2653 archived at the FSD (Finnish Social Science Data Archive).The dataset has been described in as much detail as possible in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, variable and value labels, and missing values have been checked. If neces- sary, the data have been anonymised. The data and its creators shall be cited in all publications and presentations for which the data have been used. The bibliographic citation may be in the form suggested by the archive or in the form required by the publication. The bibliographic citation suggested by the archive: Borg, Sami (University of Tampere) & Grönlund, Kimmo (Åbo Akademi Uni- versity): Finnish National Election Study 2011 [dataset]. Version 4.0 (2020-10- 28). Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor]. http://urn.fi/urn:nbn:fi:fsd:T- FSD2653 The user shall notify the archive of all publications where she or he has used the data. The original data creators and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the reuse of the data. The codebook contains information on data content, structure and data collection, and includes a list of publications wholly or in part based on the data, according to publication informa- tion received by the FSD. The second part of the codebook contains information on variables: question texts, response options, and frequencies. The third part contains indexes. Variable distributions presented in this codebook have been generated from the SPSS files. Dis- tribution tables present variable values, frequencies (n), frequency percentages (%), and valid percentages (v. %) which take into account missing data. All distributions are unweighted. If the data contain weight variables, these will be found at the end of the variables list. In some cases frequency distributions have been substituted by descriptive statistics. Categorised responses to open-ended questions are not always included in the codebook. Distributions may contain missing data. The note "System missing (SYSMIS)" refers to missing observations (e.g. a re- spondent has not answered all questions) whereas "Missing (User missing)" refers to data the user has defined as missing. For example, the user may decide to code answer alternatives ’don’t want to say’ or ’can’t say’ as missing data. The codebook may contain attached files, the most common one being the questionnaire. Contents 1 Study description 1 1.1 Titles . .1 1.2 Subject description . .1 1.3 Structure and collection of the data . .4 1.4 Use of data . .5 2 Variables 13 3 Indexes 263 3.1 Variables in the order of occurrence . 263 3.2 Variables in alphabetical order . 286 A Questionnaires in Finnish 309 B Questionnaires in Swedish 347 C Abbreviations of Finnish Political Parties 385 i Chapter 1 Study description 1.1 Titles Titles and data version: Finnish National Election Study 2011 Titles and data version in Finnish: Eduskuntavaalitutkimus 2011 This codebook has been generated from the version 4.0 (28.10.2020) of the data. 1.2 Subject description Other material Website of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES)1 Authoring entity Borg, Sami (University of Tampere. Finnish Social Science Data Archive) Grönlund, Kimmo (Åbo Akademi University. Social Science Research Institute) Following members of the election study consortium participated in questionnaire design: Åsa Bengtsson (Åbo Akademi University), Kimmo Elo (University of Turku), Anne Maria Holli (University of Helsinki), Tapio Häyhtiö (University of Turku. School of Economics), Lauri Karvonen (Åbo Akademi University), Mikko Mattila (University of Helsinki), Tom Moring (Swedish School of Social Science), Heikki Paloheimo (University of Tampere), Lauri Rapeli (University of Turku), Jarmo Rinne (University of Tampere), Kim Strandberg (Åbo Akademi University), Peter Söderlund (Åbo Akademi University) ja Hanna Wass (University of Helsinki). Copyright statement for the data In accordance with the agreement between FSD and the depositor. 1https://cses.org/ 1 1. Study description Depositor Borg, Sami (Finnish Social Science Data Archive) Date of deposit 21.6.2011 Keywords election campaigns; elections; Internet; parliamentary candidates; parliamentary elections; party identification; personality traits; political allegiance; political attitudes; political awareness; po- litical influence; political interest; political leaders; political participation; political support; trust; voting; voting advice applications Topic Classification Fields of Science Classification: Social sciences CESSDA Classification: Elections; Political behaviour and attitudes Series description The data belong to the series: Finnish National Election Studies Finnish National Election Studies are nationally representative surveys conducted in connection with parliamentary elections in Finland. Data have been collected by the Election Study Con- sortium from the year 2003 onwards. More information in the Finnish Election Study Portal. The data, collected through face-to-face interviews and self-administered questionnaires, allow study of changes in public opinion and democracy over time. Some modules are repeated but each study also contains questions on current issues. Main themes include political participa- tion, political attitudes, candidate and party choice, voting, and election campaigning. Abstract The survey focused on the 2011 parliamentary elections in Finland. Main themes included political participation, political attitudes, party support, candidate and party choice and vot- ing behaviour. Data were collected after the elections through face-to-face interviews and a self-administered drop-off questionnaire. The interview data contain Finland’s contribution to the international CSES study. The same CSES module was fielded in Finland in 2007 (see FSD2269). 2 1.2. Subject description First questions covered interest in politics, attention to media coverage of the elections (in- cluding social media), Internet use frequency, willingness to discuss politics with others, party identification and self-perceived social class. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with some statements relating to voting, democracy, holding referendums and tolerance of people with different values or views. Willingness to influence things by own activity (for instance, by participating in a demonstration or joining a consumer boycott) was charted. Fur- ther questions covered membership in a political party, participation in election campaign work and opinions on whom a MP should represent. The survey also carried a set of attitudinal state- ments on voting, politics, political parties, politicians and public political influence. For instance ’I have no say in what the government and parliament decide’ or ’By voting people can have a say how things are run’. The CSES module explored what issues had been important to the respondents in these elec- tions, what they thought were the most important political problems facing Finland and whether it made a difference who was in power or who people voted for. Views were probed on govern- ment performance, political parties, political leaders and whether any party or political leader represented R’s views well. The respondents were asked to place themselves, the parties and party leaders on a left-right axis. Questions also covered differences between parties, the extent to which the respondents had followed election campaigning, satisfaction with democracy in Finland and whether they felt close to any party. Voting behaviour was studied with questions on whether the respondents had voted, the candidate of which party they had voted for, whether they had considered voting for a candidate of any other party and if yes, which party, whether they had voted in the previous parliamentary elections and which party they voted for. Finally, the respondents’ factual knowledge was tested with a few questions. Non-voters were asked why they had not voted and how self-evident not voting had been to them. Those who had voted for the True Finns were asked to what extent a number of issues had influenced their decision to vote for a candidate of that party and what had been the main reason. All those who had voted were asked what had influenced their choice of party, to what extent various issues had influenced their candidate choice, whether they had voted for the same candidate before and when had they decided whom and which party to vote for. One question explored how the respondents wanted MPs to vote in Parliament in cases where there was a conflict of opinion between them, their party or their voters. One theme pertained to trust in government and other institutions, groups and people. The self-administered questionnaire surveyed what issues had been decisive for the respon- dents’ party choice in the elections, opinions on what kind of policies Finland should focus on
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Elections 2011, Preliminary Data
    Elections 2011 Parliamentary elections 2011, preliminary data True Finns the biggest winner in the elections. Coalition Party the largest party in the Parliamentary elections 2011 Corrected on 27 April 2011. The correction is indicated in red. The True Finns emerged as the winner of the elections as the other parliamentary parties lost their support compared with the previous Parliamentary elections. The True Finns increased their support by 14.9 percentage points, thus gaining 19.0 per cent of the country's votes, which raised it from the smallest parliamentary party into the third largest party in Finland. The number of votes cast for the True Finns gave it 34 additional seats in Parliament. In total, the True Finns got 39 MPs and a total of 559,000 votes in the whole country, which is over 447,000 votes more than in the Parliamentary elections 2007. Support for parties in Parliamentary elections 2011 and 2007 The Centre Party of Finland lost most in the elections, as it dropped from the largest party to the fourth biggest party. The Centre Party gained 15.8 per cent of all the votes cast. When compared with the previous Parliamentary elections, its support went down by 7.3 percentage points. The Centre Party received 463,000 votes and 35 MPs into Parliament. The number of seats for the party fell by 16 and the number of votes by over 177,000 compared with the 2007 Parliamentary elections. Helsinki 18.4.2011 Quoting is encouraged provided Statistics Finland is acknowledged as the source. The National Coalition Party emerged as the largest party.
    [Show full text]
  • Europeanparliamentelections2009
    Elections 2009 European Parliament elections 2009, nomination of candidates Nomination of candidates in European Parliament elections 2009 Elections of the Members of the European Parliament will be held in 27 European Union countries between 4 and 7 June 2009. In Finland the election day is 7 June 2009. Advance voting takes place in Finland on 27-30 May and 1-2 June 2009 and abroad on 27-30 May 2009. Elections for the Members of European Parliament (European Parliament elections) are held in each Member State in accordance with national election legislation. A total of 736 Members of the European Parliament will be selected for the five-year electoral period 2009-2014 and thirteen of them will be Finnish. In Finland candidates for the European Parliament elections can be nominated by registered parties and voters’ associations set up by eligible voters. Parties may establish electoral alliances and voters’ associations can form joint lists. Each party or electoral alliance may nominate at most 20 candidates and all of these candidates are nominated nationwide. One voters’ association was set up for these elections. All but one of the 14 registered political parties and one voters’ association nominated candidates in the elections (the Communist Workers’ Party did not nominate candidates). The total number of candidates is 241. Of the candidates 139 are men and 102 are women. The National Coalition Party, the Social Democratic Party and the Left Alliance nominated equal numbers of women and men. Women are in the majority among the Green League’s nominations; 11 of the nominated candidates are women and 9 men.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Election System. Overview
    Publica� ons of the Opera� ons and 2020:3 Ministry of Jus� ce Finland administra� on The Finnish Election System Overview Publications of the Ministry of Justice, Operations and administration 2020:3 The Finnish Election System Overview Ministry of Justice, Finland, Helsinki 2020 Ministry of Justice, Finland ISBN: 978-952-259-792-2 Layout: Government Administration Department, Publications Helsinki 2020 Description sheet Published by Ministry of Justice, Finland 21 January 2020 Authors Arto Jääskeläinen The Finnish Election System Title of publication Overview Series and publication Publications of the Ministry of Justice, Operations and administration number 2020:3 Operations and Register number VN/12138/2019 Subject administration ISBN PDF 978-952-259-792-2 ISSN (PDF) 2490-208X Website address http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-259-792-2 (URN) Pages 38 Language English Keywords elections, election system Abstract General presentation of the Finnish election system. Publisher Ministry of Justice, Finland Distributed by/ Online version: julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi Publication sales Publication sales: vnjulkaisumyynti.fi Kuvailulehti Julkaisija Oikeusministeriö 21.1.2020 Tekijät Arto Jääskeläinen Suomen vaalijärjestelmä Julkaisun nimi Yleisesitys Julkaisusarjan nimi Oikeusministeriön julkaisuja, Toiminta ja hallinto ja numero 2020:3 Diaari/hankenumero VN/12138/2019 Teema Toiminta ja hallinto ISBN PDF 978-952-259-792-2 ISSN PDF 2490-208X URN-osoite http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-259-792-2 Sivumäärä 38 Kieli englanti Asiasanat vaalit, vaalijärjestelmä
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Finland 2017
    parliament of finland 2017 arliament convened for its first 2017 plenary In addition to the formation of the new parliamentary session on 1 February on the substitute premises group, Parliament gained several new MPs in 2017 to P in the Sibelius Academy, where it still operated replace the MPs leaving Parliament. for the spring term due to the renovation of the Olli Rehn (Centre Party) was granted a release Parliament Building. The honorary speaker of from the office of Member of Parliament as of 1 Parliament by age, MP Pertti Salolainen (National February. Rehn was replaced by Pekka Puska (Centre Coalition Party), chaired the opening session until Party). the election of the Speaker and two Deputy Speakers. Nasima Razmyar (Social Democratic Party) was Parliament re-elected Maria Lohela (Finns Party) as released from the office of Member of Parliament as Speaker, Mauri Pekkarinen (Centre Party) as First of 9 June. Razmyar was replaced by Pilvi Torsti (Social Deputy Speaker and Arto Satonen (National Coalition Democratic Party). Party) as Second Deputy Speaker. The opening Hanna Mäntylä (New Alternative) left Parliament ceremonies of the parliamentary session took place at on 30 June. She was replaced on 3 July by Matti Finlandia Hall on 2 February. Torvinen (New Alternative). Alexander Stubb (National Coalition Party) Many changes in the composition of Parliament was granted a release from the office of Member of Parliament as of 30 July. As of 2 August, he was There were exceptionally large changes in the replaced by Pia Kauma (National Coalition Party). composition of Parliament during the parliamentary The government parties, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Sairaanhoitajat Protestoivat Eduskuntatalon Edessä
    PerusSuomalainen 10/2007 12. vuosikerta - Poliittinen lehti - Irtonumero 3 e - Perussuomalaiset - Sannfi nländarna rp:n äänenkannattaja KKuva:uva: JJussiussi NNiinistöiinistö Sairaanhoitajat protestoivat eduskuntatalon edessä Sisällöstä: - Soini: tavoitteena henkinen markkinajohtajuus 3 - Haastattelussa Veltto Virtanen 6 - Suomessa on nyt töitä ja tekijöitä omasta takaa 7 - Kotimaisen hunajan hankinnassa 8 Kansanedustajat Pirkko Ruohonen-Lerner, Pentti Oinonen ja Pertti Virtanen osoittamassa tukeaan hoitajille - PerusSuomalaisten tehoisku Lohjalla 9 mielenosoituksessa eduskunnan edessä 11.9.2007. Kuva: Jussi Niinistö - Vielä kuulee suomea ”Äänislinnassa” 15 PerusSuomalaisten pikkujoulut lähestyvät, lisää tietoa sivulla 20 PerusSuomalainen 10/2007 Internet-sivut: www.perussuomalaiset.fi Sähköposti: peruss@perussuomalaiset.fi 1 Päätoimittaja Harri Lindell [email protected] Muhamettilaisuudesta kääntyneet pois uskonnos- raha puolestaan noudatte- ajattelutavan välillä, pyr- Pahimmillaan tämä mer- taan, joka sortaa naisia ja lee samaa linjaa kuin ame- kivät tosiasiassa estämään kitsee yhteiskuntamme laki- Toistuvasti nousee esille asettaa heidät länsimaisen rikkalaiset ovat luvanneet islamin esiinmarssin länsi- en, ja kansalaisten asentei- pilapiirtäjiä, jotka haluavat ajattelutavan mukaan hal- Al-Qaida -verkoston johta- maissa. den muuttumista yhä tiu- ärsyttää ja herättää keskus- paan asemaan. jista. Veriraha verirahasta. Pelkona on Turkin ja en- kempaan Koraanin mää- telua. Tähän tarkoitukseen tisten Neuvostoliiton tasa-
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Systems in Context Finland
    OUP UNCORRECTED PROOF – FIRSTPROOFS, Thu Nov 30 2017, NEWGEN Chapter 29 Electoral Systems in Context Finland Åsa von Schoultz (née Bengtsson) Placing the Electoral System in Context In the family of proportional electoral systems, Finland makes a rare flower by com- bining a proportional formula and multimember districts1 with fully open lists and mandatory preferential voting. Open- list proportional representation (OLPR) provides the Finnish electoral system with two levels of competition. In line with Duverger’s law (1954), the proportional formula applied in multimember districts has generated a mul- tiparty system, which in turn involves a high degree of interparty competition. Finnish elections, as elections in most Western European countries, are fought between parties (or alliances of parties), and the allocation of seats across parties determines how power is distributed and used in the parliament. The open lists and mandatory preferential vot- ing features do, however, also provide the system with a high degree of intraparty com- petition. Alongside the constituency- based battle between parties, candidates within the same party compete over the seats that the party collectively will win. This inherent duality has a multitude of effects on how elections are played out at different levels of the political system. It has consequences for thenomination of can- didates, for how campaigns are fought and elections won, and for the behavior and atti- tudes of voters, politicians, and parties, just to name a few. The effects of this duality and in particular how the high degree of intraparty competition influences the political logic of Finnish politics will be explored later on in this chapter after a thorough presentation of the basic features of the electoral system.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Elections 2021
    Elections 2021 Municipal elections 2021 Nomination of candidates and background analysis of candidates A total of 35,627 candidates in Municipal elections 2021 Altogether 35,627 candidates were nominated for the 2021 Municipal elections, which is 2,009 (5.6 per cent) more than in the previous Municipal elections. Nineteen of the registered parties nominated candidates, while the number of candidates nominated by constituency associations was 1,126. Of the candidates, 21,480 are men and 14,147 women. Of the candidates nominated, 176 are current Members of Parliament and 6,520 are current municipal councillors. Of the parties, the most candidates were nominated by the Centre Party of Finland, 6,871 candidates and the least candidates were nominated by the Citizens’ Party, two candidates. The data are based on Statistics Finland's statistics on the nomination of candidates for the Municipal elections 2021. Women's and men’s proportions of candidates in Municipal elections 1953–2021 In Municipal elections, candidates can be nominated by registered political parties and constituency associations established by persons entitled to vote. Parties may form electoral alliances and constituency associations may form joint lists. Each party or electoral alliance may nominate at most 1.5 times the number of candidates as the number of councillors elected in the municipality. Of all candidates, 95.6 per cent were nominated by the current parliamentary parties. Of the candidates, 1.2 per cent were nominated by parties that do not have MPs in the present Parliament. Of such parties, the most candidates Helsinki 04.06.2021 Quoting is encouraged provided Statistics Finland is acknowledged as the source.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Political System (5 Ects)
    THE FINNISH POLITICAL SYSTEM (3 ECTS) Tapio Raunio ([email protected]) Background and objectives The objective of the course is to introduce students to the Finnish political system After the course the students should understand how the political system of Finland operates and how the Nordic model of politics differs from other democracies The lecture series focuses on the Finnish political system. In addition, students are expected to read an article about Nordic politics Course organisation The dates and topics of the lectures are: 9.10. Introduction / Political culture 10.10. Voting and elections / Political parties / Parliament / Government / President 11.10. Corporatism and the welfare state / EU and security policies / Swedish-speaking minority / Concluding discussion Course evaluation is based on participation in the lectures and a learning diary. The learning diary (8-10 pages, font size 12, 1½ spacing) must be submitted by email to the teacher by 3 November POLITICAL CULTURE The homogeneity of the population The population of Finland is 5.5 million and is projected to stay at approximately the current level in the near future The official languages are Finnish, spoken by 88 % of the population, and Swedish, the first language of 5.3 % of the citizens 72 % of Finns are Lutherans Culturally Finland is still homogeneous. 6.2 % of the population were of ‘foreign background’ while 4,2 % held foreign passports (2015). Estonians and Russians are the largest groups Nonetheless, Finland has become rapidly more multicultural since the early 1990s Structural change What sets Finland apart in a European comparison is the prolonged predominance of the primary sector (agriculture and forestry) in the economy After the Second World War markets of pulp and paper industry boomed, and war reparations to Soviet Union made it necessary to expand the share of the metal industry in Finland’s industrial output.
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Elections 2021
    Elections 2021 Municipal elections 2021 Review of voting in the Municipal elections Over one-half of voters voted in advance Statistics Finland releases information on the background of persons who voted in the Municipal elections 2021. The voting turnout in the elections was 55.1 per cent, which was the lowest since the 1945 Municipal elections. Clearly over one-half (60.0%) of those who voted cast their votes in advance. Detailed information about unit-level background factors on voting turnout is found in the review: Persons who voted in Municipal elections 2021. Voting percentages in Municipal elections 1984–2021 Clearly over one-half (60.0%) of those who voted did so in advance, the share of advance voters among persons entitled to vote was 33.1 per cent. In main type of activity groups advance voting was most common among pensioners, 45.1 per cent of those belonging to this group voted in advance. Helsinki 13.7.2021 Quoting is encouraged provided Statistics Finland is acknowledged as the source. Share of advance voters among persons entitled to vote by main type of activity group in Municipal elections 2017 and 2021, % Examined by age those aged 75 were the most active advance voters (52.2% of persons entitled to vote), the number of advance voters was in relative terms lowest among those aged 18 (18.1%). In the voting districts where voting data was also available for the election day, the voting turnout was highest for those entitled to vote aged 73, of whom 69.6 per cent voted. The electronic voting register that enables a detailed examination of voting data on the election day was in use in 152 municipalities, of which 99 received data from all voting districts.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming a 'National' Party? the Greens in the 2019 Finnish
    This is the accepted manuscript of the article, which has been published in Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1646445 Becoming a ‘national’ party? The Greens in the 2019 Finnish parliamentary elections Tapio Raunio Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland [email protected] The Green League approached the April 2019 election to the Eduskunta, Finland’s unicameral national legislature, with a mixture of high hopes and cautious optimism. Finland had been governed since the 2015 election by a centre-right coalition that brought together the agrarian/liberal Centre Party, the conservative National Coalition, and the populist Finns Party. Led by Prime Minister Juha Sipilä, the government had introduced cuts to public sector expenditure and its main project was the reorganization of social and health services (known by its acronym SOTE in Finnish) that sought to combine directly-elected regional councils with a larger role for private companies in delivering the services. While the project ultimately failed, it nonetheless meant that the Sipilä cabinet was seen as an ‘austerity’ government almost exclusively concerned with competitiveness and reducing public debt; the government also downsized the education budget and reduced Finland’s development aid. Moreover, the government almost fell apart in the summer/autumn of 2015 when the European Union agreed to the third Greek bailout package and decided in favour of re-allocating asylum-seekers amongst the member states. These problems provided a window of opportunity for the Greens. Under the leadership of Ville Niinistö the Green League effectively became the leading, or at least the most vocal, opposition party, criticizing the cabinet strongly for its socially conservative policies whilst calling particularly for investment in education.
    [Show full text]
  • The Implementation of the Goals
    Vuosikertomus 2011 english:Vuosikertomus 16.5.2012 08:07 Sivu1 Vuosikertomus 2011 english:Vuosikertomus 16.5.2012 08:07 Sivu2 Financial statements speed up the balancing of the economy € 49 million less than estimated in the budget. Loans per inhabitant amounted to € 1,502, which is € 583 less than the national average. The City’s debt in- creased by € 38 per inhabitant. The very rapid growth of operating costs was the biggest cause for alarm in last year’s development. The budget was re- vised three times during the year. Al- though a net total of € 11.7 million was added to operating costs, they still ex- ceeded the revised budget by € 10 mil- lion. Although the financial status of our Ari Järvelä city is still relatively stable, we must take he implementation of the goals ments showed a deficit for the third time proactive measures to balance revenues determined in the Tampere during the period of application of the and costs. The annual increase in expen- Flows city strategy progressed Finnish Accounting Act (since 1997). The diture must be kept within limits allowed Tfavourably towards the realisa- City’s result before appropriations was in by growth. This requires moderation in tion of the City Council’s term of office deficit by € 12.5 million. All in all, the starting new services that add expendi- goals. Some 75 per cent of the opera- City’s deficit for the financial period was ture as well as a critical review of the cur- tional goals set for 2011 were realised as € 13.8 million after appropriations.
    [Show full text]