К Познанию Биологии Cistogaster Globosa
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen Und Angaben Zur Verbreitung Und Ökologie Der Einzelnen Arten
5 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde Serie A (Biologie) Herausgeber: 4fr für Naturkunde, RosensteinV 70 19 l; , Staatliches Museum 1, D- r Stuttgart Stuttgarter Beitr. Naturk. Ser. A Nr. 506 170 S ,4. 9. 19.94 Professor Dr. Bernhard Ziegler zum 65. Geburtstag Die Raupenfliegen (Diptera: Tachinidae) Mitteleuropas: Bestimmungstabellen und Angaben zur Verbreitung und Ökologie der einzelnen Arten The Tachinids (Diptera: Tachinidae) of Central Europe: Identification Keys for the Species and Data on Distribution and Ecology Von Hans-Peter Tschorsnig und Benno Herting, Stuttgart Mit 291 Abbildungen Summary Keys are given for all central and northern European species of Tachinidae (Diptera). The most important data on distribution and ecology (mainly habitat, phenology, and host-range) are listed for the central European species. Zuammenfassung Es werden Bestimmungsschlüssel für alle in Mittel- und Nordeuropa vorkommenden Arten der Tachinidae (Diptera) gegeben. Für jede mitteleuropäische Art werden die wichtigsten Kenndaten zur Verbreitung und Ökologie (vor allem Habitat, Flugzeit und Wirtskreis) aufge- listet. Inhalt 1. Einleitung 2 2. Beg'iff.c erklärungen 4 2.1. Allgemeines 4 2.2. Kopf 5 2.3. Thorax 7 2.4. Flügel 8 2.5. Beine 9 2.6. Abdomen 10 2.7. Bereifung 11 2.8. Färbung . 11 download Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/ 2 STUTTGARTER BEITRÄGE ZUR NATURKUNDE Ser. A, Nr. 506 2.9. Körpergröße 11 2.10. Abkürzungen 11 3. Schlüssel für die Gattungen 12 4. Schlüssel für die Arten . 42 4.1. Subfamilie Exoristinae 42 4.2. Subfamilie Tachininae 63 4.3. Subfamilie Dexiinae 79 4.4. -
Information on Tachinid Fauna (Diptera, Tachinidae) of the Phasiinae Subfamily in the Far East of Russia
International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) ISSN: 2249 – 8958, Volume-9 Issue-2, December, 2019 Information on Tachinid Fauna (Diptera, Tachinidae) Of the Phasiinae Subfamily in the Far East of Russia Markova T.O., Repsh N.V., Belov A.N., Koltun G.G., Terebova S.V. Abstract: For the first time, a comparative analysis of the For example, for the Hemyda hertingi Ziegler et Shima tachinid fauna of the Phasiinae subfamily of the Russian Far species described in the Primorsky Krai in 1996 for the first East with the fauna of neighboring regions has been presented. time the data on findings in Western, Southern Siberia and The Phasiinae fauna of the Primorsky Krai (Far East of Russia) is characterized as peculiar but closest to the fauna of the Khabarovsk Krai were given. For the first time, southern part of Khabarovsk Krai, Amur Oblast and Eastern Redtenbacheria insignis Egg. for Eastern Siberia and the Siberia. The following groups of regions have been identified: Kuril Islands, Phasia barbifrons (Girschn.) for Western Southern, Western and Eastern Siberia; Amur Oblast and Siberia, and Elomya lateralis (Mg.) and Phasia hemiptera Primorsky Krai, which share many common Holarctic and (F.) were indicated.At the same time, the following species Transpalaearctic species.Special mention should be made of the have been found in the Primorsky Krai, previously known in fauna of the Khabarovsk Krai, Sakhalin Oblast, which are characterized by poor species composition and Japan (having a Russia only in the south of Khabarovsk Krai and in the subtropical appearance). Amur Oblast (Markova, 1999): Phasia aurigera (Egg.), Key words: Diptera, Tachinidae, Phasiinae, tachinid, Phasia zimini (D.-M.), Leucostoma meridianum (Rond.), Russian Far East, fauna. -
A Provisional Assessment of the Status of Calypterate Flies in the UK
Natural England Commissioned Report NECR234 A Provisional Assessment of the Status of Calypterate flies in the UK Calypterate First published 30th August 2017 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background This report should be cited as: Making good decisions to conserve species should primarily be based upon an objective FALK, S.J, & PONT, A.C. 2017. A Provisional process of determining the degree of threat to Assessment of the Status of Calypterate flies in the survival of a species. The recognised the UK. Natural England. Commissioned international approach to undertaking this is by Reports, Number234 assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat categories. This report was originally commissioned to update the threat status of some calypterate fly families. It is based on text originally submitted in 2005-12, but subsequently updated a number of times, most recently in late 2016. It provides a valuable repository of information on many species and should act as a springboard to further survey and work. Reviews for other invertebrate groups will follow. Natural England Project Manager - David Heaver, Senior Invertebrate Specialist [email protected] Contractor - FALK, S.J, & PONT, A.C Keywords - Diptera, true flies, house flies, bluebottles, flesh flies , invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England Access to Evidence Catalogue: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/ . -
Tachinidae Bigot 1853
Dr Francesco Fiume Tachinidae Bigot 1853 Taxonomy of Tachinidae family Clade Natura Clade Mundus Plinius Superdominium/Superdomain Biota Bernard Pelletier 2012 Domain Eukaryota (Chatton 1925) Whittaker et Margulis 1978 Clade Amorphea Adl 2005 Clade Opisthokonta (Cavalier Smith 1987) Adl 2005 Clade Holozoa Lang et al . 2002 Kingdom Animalia Linnaeus 1758 Clade Epitheliozoa Ax 1996 Subkingdom Eumetazoa Bütschli 1910 Clade Bilateria Hatschek 1888 Clade Eubilateria Ax 1987 or (synonym) Nephrozoa Jondelius et al. 2002 Clade Protostomia Grobben 1908 Clade Ecdysozoa Aguinaldo et al . 1997 Superphylum Panarthropoda Nielsen 1995 Phylum Arthropoda von Siebold 1848 Clade Euarthropoda Lankester 1904 Clade Mandibulata Snodgrass 1938 Clade Crustaceomorpha Chernyshev 1960 Clade Labrophora Siveter, Waloszek et Williams 2003 Subphylum Pancrustacea Zrzavý et al . 1997 Clade Altocrustacea Regier et al . 2010 Clade Miracrustacea Regier et al . 2010 Superclass Exapoda Latreille 1825 Class Insecta Linnaeus 1758 Clade Dicondylia Hennig 1953 Subclass Pterygota Lang 1888 Infraclass Neoptera van der Wulp 1890 Clade Eumetabola Hennig 1953 Clade Holometabola Heider 1889 or (synonym) Endopterygota Sharp 1898 Superordo Panorpida Kristensen 1981 or (synonym) Mecoptera Hyatt et Arms 1891 Clade Antliophora Henning 1969 Order Diptera Linnaeus 1758 Suborder Brachycera Schiner 1862 Section Cyclorrhapha Brauer 1863 Infraorder Muscomorpha McAlpine 1989 Section Schizophora Becher 1882 Subsection Calyptratae Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 Superfamily Oestroidea Latreille 1817 Family Tachinidae Bigot 1853. Generality The Tachinidae are a large and variable family of true flies within the insect order Diptera , with more than 8,200 known species and many more to be discovered. Over 1300 species have been described in North America alone. Insects in this family commonly are called tachina flies or simply tachinids. -
Gibbs, D.J (2019). Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol
INVERTEBRATE MONITORING OF TROOPERS HILL, BRISTOL David J. Gibbs 07 January 2020 This report was produced for Friends of Troopers Hill, funded by the National Lottery Heritage Fund. David J. Gibbs Orchard Cottage Cecil Road Weston-super-Mare BS23 2NF [email protected] Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol David J. Gibbs 2019 This report should be quoted as: Gibbs, D.J (2019). Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol. Report to Friends of Troopers Hill. Cover photograph: Dasystoma salicella captured on 11 April. 2 Invertebrate Monitoring of Troopers Hill, Bristol David J. Gibbs 2019 Contents 1 Summary.............................................................................................................................4 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................4 3 Survey Methodology ..........................................................................................................4 3.1 Sampling Techniques .................................................................................................4 3.2 Sample Timing ...........................................................................................................5 3.3 Constraints ..................................................................................................................5 3.4 Identification...............................................................................................................5 3.5 Taxonomic Coverage -
Observations of Tachinidae (Diptera) in the Surroundings of Friedberg
Figure 1. Collection locations around Friedberg, Hessen, Germany. Observations of Tachinidae (Diptera) in the surroundings of Friedberg (Hessen, Germany) with notes on some interesting species by Jaakko Pohjoismäki Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, FI-80101 Joensuu, Finland. E-mail: [email protected] In this essay I give a brief impression of the lage are dominated by cherry orchards and flanked local tachinid fauna in the Friedberg region with an on its northern edge by the Taunus Nature Park. introduction to some interesting collecting loca- This park is characterized by hilly terrain with tions. Besides a listing the tachinid species ob- oak (Quercus robur) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) served during the collecting seasons 2010–2012, I dominated woods with a network of small roads make an estimate of their abundances and high- and hiking paths. light some interesting observations. During my stay I had the opportunity to do some unsystematic collecting and observing of Collecting in and around Friedberg tachinids in and around Friedberg, mainly in the terrain surrounding Ockstadt itself but also in the Because of work reasons I lived in the vil- nearby areas of the Taunus Nature Park and in lage of Ockstadt in Friedberg of Hessen, Ger- some recreational parks in the neighboring Bad many in 2010–2012. Friedberg is situated some Nauheim (Fig. 1). The season typically started in 35 km north from Frankfurt am Main in the typical the end of March with early spring species such as agricultural landscape of the Hessen highlands Kirbya moerens (Meigen) and continued until the (140–600 m). -
View the PDF File of the Tachinid Times, Issue 26
THE TACHINID TIMES ISSUE 26 TTTTTT turns turns 25 25 with with a new a new look! look! Barcoding Finnish Tachinidae In quest of the Tachinid Phylogeny The pestiferous uzifly of India To 'Die Hel' and back Collecting in the Western Cape Where are all the genera? February 2013 Table of Contents Articles Progress towards a phylogeny of world Tachinidae. Year 1 4 by J.O. Stireman III, J.E. O’Hara, J.K. Moulton, P. Cerretti and I.S. Winkler Where in the world are all the tachinid genera? 10 by J.E. O’Hara DNA barcodes for north European Tachinidae: preliminary results and material request 17 by J. Pohjoismäki, J. Kahanpää and M. Mutanen To ‘Die Hel’ and back. Expeditions of the Phylogeny of World Tachinidae Project 20 Part I: Western Cape, South Africa by P. Cerretti, J.E. O’Hara, J.O. Stireman III, I.S. Winkler and A.H. Kirk-Spriggs A visit to the Vienna Museum with a brief history of the tachinid collection 30 by J.E. O’Hara Observations of Tachinidae (Diptera) in the surroundings 39 of Friedberg (Hessen, Germany) with notes on some interesting species by J. Pohjoismäki Metapopulation biology of the Indian uzifly, Exorista 46 sorbillans (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tachinidae) by B.M. Prakash, A. Prathima, H. Ravikumar, H.C. Huchesh and H.P. Puttaraju Student News 50 Jeremy D. Blaschke 51 Zachary L. Burington 52 Book Announcement 53 Tachinid Bibliography 58 Mailing List Issue 26, 2013 The Tachinid Times February 2013, Issue 26 Message from the editor Chief Editor JAMES E. -
View the PDF File of the Tachinid Times, Issue 28
WINDING ROAD TO ENLIGHTENMENT: PROGRESS TOWARDS A TACHINID PHYLOGENY TheThe Tachinid Times TACHINID TIMESIssue 28 Issue 28 A challenge to report tachinid monstrosities Update on Finnish Tachinidae Biology of Blepharomyia piliceps Host records for Onychogonia cervini In Memoriam Vera Andreevna Richter FebruaryFebruary 2015 2015 Table of Contents Articles Phylogeny of World Tachinidae Project. Continuing progress 4 towards a phylogeny of Tachinidae by J.O. Stireman III, J.E. O’Hara, J.K. Moulton, P. Cerretti, I.S. Winkler, J.D. Blaschke and Z.L. Burington On the biology of Blepharomyia piliceps (Zetterstedt) (Diptera: 8 Tachinidae) by H. Haraldseide A tachinid with a homeotic mutation – a report and a challenge to 12 fellow collectors by J. Pohjoismäki Checklist of Finnish Diptera published 14 by J. Pohjoismäki, A. Haarto, K. Winqvist and J. Kahanpää New host records for Onychogonia cervini (Bigot) 17 by J. Pohjoismäki and J. Itämies In Memoriam Vera Andreevna Richter 1936–2015 18 by J.E. O’Hara Congress Report 8th International Congress of Dipterology, Potsdam, Germany, 20 August 2014 by J.E. O’Hara 22 Tachinid Bibliography 29 Mailing List 2 The Tachinid Times Issue 28, 2015 The Tachinid Times February 2015, Issue 28 INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Chief Editor JAMES E. O'HARA This newsletter accepts submissions on all aspects of tach- inid biology and systematics. It is intentionally maintained as a InDesign Editor AJ FLEMING non-peer-reviewed publication so as not to relinquish its status as Staff JUST US a venue for those who wish to share information about tachinids in an informal medium. All submissions are subjected to careful editing and some are (informally) reviewed if the content is thought ISSN 1925-3435 (Print) to need another opinion. -
The Tachinid Times
The Tachinid Times ISSUE 15 February 2002 Jim O'Hara, editor Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Systematic Entomology Section Eastern Cereal and Oilseed Research Centre C.E.F., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0C6 Correspondence: [email protected] This issue marks the fifteenth year of The Tachinid newsletter before the end of January 2003. This newsletter Times, a milestone I could not have envisioned when I appears first in hardcopy and then on the Internet some started the newsletter as a graduate student in 1988. I thank weeks later. all of you who contribute to the newsletter and those of you who tell me that you like to receive it, for without your Some characteristics of New Zealand Tachinidae (by support The Tachinid Times would not still be in distrib- J.S. Dugdale) ution. New Zealand Tachinidae show the following features: This year The Tachinid Times is again produced as 1. Representation "unbalanced": One subfamily (Dexiinae ® an Acrobat PDF file for the benefit of those who might or Proseninae of some authors) is absent. What is a want to download and/or print the newsletter from the dominant subfamily in many other faunas (Exoristinae) is Internet. Later this spring I hope to offer all back issues as reduced to one genus (Pales) in NZ. The subfamily PDF files on the newsletter's homepage at http://res2.agr. Tachininae dominates in NZ, with about 158 species ca/ecorc/isbi/tachinid/times/index.htm. I do not have text (about 83% of the endemic fauna) and these are in genera versions of issues 1 to 4 so the contents of those issues will currently regarded as endemic. -
An Updated Checklist of Croatian Tachinidae (Diptera)
NAT. CROAT. VOL. 27 No 1 57-95 ZAGREB June 30, 2018 original scientific paper / izvorni znanstveni rad DOI 10.20302/NC.2018.27.4 AN UPDATED CHECKLIST OF CROATIAN TACHINIDAE (DIPTERA) Erikas Lutovinovas1, Roman Ozimec2, Miroslav Barták3 & Bože Kokan4 1Nature Research Centre, Akademijos 2, LT-084 12 Vilnius, Lithuania (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected]) 2ADIPA–Croatian Society for Natural History Diversity Research & Conservation, Orehovečki ogranak 37, HR-100 40 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected]) 3Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21 Praha, Czech Republic (e-mail: [email protected]) 4Natural History Museum and Zoo, Kolombatovićevo šetalište 2, HR-210 00 Split, Croatia (e-mail: [email protected]) Lutovinovas, E., Ozimec, R., Barták, M. & Kokan, B.: An updated checklist of Croatian Tachinidae (Diptera). Vol. 27, No. 1., 57-96, 2018, Zagreb. We have listed 307 species of Tachinidae presently known from the country. Our checklist contains data from all available sources cited below the species names. New material consisting of 100 species has been studied to support the literature. There are still 29 doubtful records, as well as 3 doubtful taxa, mentioned by old references, the validity of which needs to be confirmed; these records are reviewed apart from the main species list. Keywords: Tachinidae, checklist, distribution, Croatia, Balkan Peninsula Lutovinovas, E., Ozimec, R., Barták, M. & Kokan, B.: Ažurirani popis hrvatskih muha gusjeničarki (Diptera: Tachinidae). Vol. 27, No. 1., 57-96, 2018, Zagreb. -
Diptera: Tachinidae)
RESEARCH ARTICLE DNA Barcodes for the Northern European Tachinid Flies (Diptera: Tachinidae) Jaakko L. O. PohjoismaÈki1*, Jere KahanpaÈaÈ 2, Marko Mutanen3 1 University of Eastern Finland, Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, P.O.Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland, 2 University of Helsinki, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki, Finland, 3 Department of Genetics and Physiology, PO. Box 3000, 90014 University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland * [email protected] a11111 Abstract This data release provides COI barcodes for 366 species of parasitic flies (Diptera: Tachini- dae), enabling the DNA based identification of the majority of northern European species and a large proportion of Palearctic genera, regardless of the developmental stage. The data will provide a tool for taxonomists and ecologists studying this ecologically important OPEN ACCESS but challenging parasitoid family. A comparison of minimum distances between the nearest Citation: PohjoismaÈki JLO, KahanpaÈaÈ J, Mutanen neighbors revealed the mean divergence of 5.52% that is approximately the same as M (2016) DNA Barcodes for the Northern European observed earlier with comparable sampling in Lepidoptera, but clearly less than in Coleop- Tachinid Flies (Diptera: Tachinidae). PLoS ONE 11 tera. Full barcode-sharing was observed between 13 species pairs or triplets, equaling to (11): e0164933. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0164933 7.36% of all species. Delimitation based on Barcode Index Number (BIN) system was com- pared with traditional classification of species and interesting cases of possible species Editor: Claude Wicker-Thomas, CNRS, FRANCE oversplits and cryptic diversity are discussed. Overall, DNA barcodes are effective in sepa- Received: May 31, 2016 rating tachinid species and provide novel insight into the taxonomy of several genera. -
Wormwood Scrubs Park, East Acton: a Preliminary Invertebrate Assessment
Wormwood Scrubs Park, East Acton: a preliminary invertebrate assessment. Richard A. Jones. 2018 Wormwood Scrubs Park, East Acton: a preliminary invertebrate assessment during 2018 BY RICHARD A. JONES F.R.E.S., F.L.S. 135 Friern Road, East Dulwich, London SE22 0AZ Contents SUMMARY ................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 3 METHODS ................................................................................................... 3 Site visits................................................................................................... 3 Site compartments .................................................................................... 3 Location and collection of specimens ....................................................... 4 Taxonomic coverage ................................................................................ 4 SURVEY RESULTS ..................................................................................... 4 General ..................................................................................................... 4 Noteworthy species .................................................................................. 5 Nationally rare (red data book) species .................................................... 5 Nationally scarce (notable) species .......................................................... 6 Very local species ....................................................................................