A Provisional Assessment of the Status of Calypterate Flies in the UK

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Provisional Assessment of the Status of Calypterate Flies in the UK Natural England Commissioned Report NECR234 A Provisional Assessment of the Status of Calypterate flies in the UK Calypterate First published 30th August 2017 www.gov.uk/natural -england Foreword Natural England commission a range of reports from external contractors to provide evidence and advice to assist us in delivering our duties. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background This report should be cited as: Making good decisions to conserve species should primarily be based upon an objective FALK, S.J, & PONT, A.C. 2017. A Provisional process of determining the degree of threat to Assessment of the Status of Calypterate flies in the survival of a species. The recognised the UK. Natural England. Commissioned international approach to undertaking this is by Reports, Number234 assigning the species to one of the IUCN threat categories. This report was originally commissioned to update the threat status of some calypterate fly families. It is based on text originally submitted in 2005-12, but subsequently updated a number of times, most recently in late 2016. It provides a valuable repository of information on many species and should act as a springboard to further survey and work. Reviews for other invertebrate groups will follow. Natural England Project Manager - David Heaver, Senior Invertebrate Specialist [email protected] Contractor - FALK, S.J, & PONT, A.C Keywords - Diptera, true flies, house flies, bluebottles, flesh flies , invertebrates, red list, IUCN, status reviews, IUCN threat categories, GB rarity status Further information This report can be downloaded from the Natural England Access to Evidence Catalogue: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/ . For information on Natural England publications contact the Natural England Enquiry Service on 0300 060 3900 or e-mail [email protected]. This report is published by Natural England under the Open Government Licence - OGLv3.0 for public sector information. You are encouraged to use, and reuse, information subject to certain conditions. For details of the licence visit Copyright. Natural England photographs are only available for non commercial purposes. If any other information such as maps or data cannot be used commercially this will be made clear within the report. ISBN 978-1-78354-435-6 © Natural England and other parties 2017 This Assessment covers the following fly families: Anthomyiidae Calliphoridae Fanniidae Hippoboscidae Muscidae Nycteribiidae Oestridae Rhinophoridae Sarcophagidae 1 Table of Contents 1. Species listed by provisional status category.................................................................... 12 2. Taxonomic list of species previously assigned a conservation status but now excluded from this Assessment. ....................................................................................................... 19 3. Taxonomic list of Provisional Red Data Book and Nationally Scarce species ................ 19 4. Easy access table of the Provisional Status categories ..................................................... 26 5. Format of the data sheets .................................................................................................. 39 Information on the data sheets .......................................................................................... 39 The data sheets .................................................................................................................. 41 6. Acknowledgements......................................................................................................... 236 7. Index ............................................................................................................................... 253 2 1. Introduction to the Provisional Status Assessment Series. This report is one of a new set dealing with the status of the lesser known and less well-recorded invertebrates in the UK. The series aims to draw together and share what is known about such species, very much with a view to spurring on further interest in and recording of them. These volumes are complimentary to the Species Status Review Series which, by its very nature, covers groups with robust data sets, amenable to scrutiny through the lens of the IUCN threat categories, and with a more comprehensive understanding of both distribution and ecology. It is hoped that in drawing together the available information on the status of their species, the new Assessments will encourage greater consideration of the species needs both by those charged with their conservation and with those engaged in recording their distribution and numbers. The bulk of the text for this volume is now somewhat historic (2005-2012), although has had some minor re-evaluation and text updates until April 2017. Readers should therefore be aware of this when using this work. Use of the Assessment The use of IUCN terminology allows us to classify, describe and communicate information about the status of individual species. We have added the prefix p to indicate that this is very much a provisional assessment based on data which would be insufficient for a formal IUCN status review. As the two sorts of assessment are not equivalent, care needs to exercised in their appropriate use. The scarcer (under our current understanding) species have been given a provisional status category. When using these Provisional status classes, they should be reported in the form of “pVulnerable” to make it clear that is does not have the same footing or authority as an IUCN- compliant judgement of “Vulnerable” found in modern Species Status review series. The weighting given to the taxa in this volume in areas such as environmental impact assessment or community conservation value must be similarly moderated down, and a lower conservation class value applied in the calculation of quality scores. Suggested date for re-assessment: 2025. 3 2. Introduction to the Assessment of the status of the Calypterate flies What are Calypterate flies? Readers may be familiar with some of them by their common English names such as blow flies, bluebottles, flesh flies, though these group names hide much ecological variety and interest within the genera and species, and are sometimes only applicable to sections of a family. Although regarded by some Dipterists as "boring" in appearance, the Calyptratae include several of the most important flies in the medical, veterinary and agricultural fields, as well as many species that have specialized requirements. The latter are increasingly recognised as having potential as indicators of ecological continuity and hence are associated with high quality conservation sites. They are also worthy of conservation attention in their own right, and it is hoped that this Assessment will assist with raising their profile in this regard. Does this cover the whole group? The present volume deals with some of those species which were listed but not provided with Data Sheets by Falk (1991) for the Cyclorrhapha Calyptratae, which total 1040 under the 2015 Diptera checklist. The Cyclorrhapha Calyptratae comprise eleven families (nine of which are represented in this Assessment, the exception being the Rhinophoridae), the species included representing approximately 15% of our Diptera fauna. However, rather than continue with the same family grouping in the new Assessments, it was decided to remove both the tachinid and scathophagid fly families from this Assessment and hope that they can develop their own volumes. It is hoped, that over time and with increases in recording, both families will then be able to be subject to a full and formal IUCN Species Status Review. Some species that are included by Shirt (1987) and Falk (1991) have been excluded from the present Assessment. Four of them are judged to be neither scarce nor threatened enough to be included: Muscidae Phaonia atriceps (Loew) Phaonia siebecki Schnabl Thricops innocuus (Zetterstedt) Sarcophagidae Sarcophaga africa (Wiedemann) Why have these families not been subject to an IUCN Species Status Review? The placement in an Assessment or a Review comes down largely to whether one can muster enough records together in one place to allow a dual period comparison. Whilst it is not unknown, especially in the absence of the recording scheme, to have widely scattered records, it is more often the case that the records do not exist in the numbers required to make a meaningful comparison between the two time periods , and for species ending up having more “Data Deficient” ascriptions than is (probably) really the case. With a larger, multi-family assessment, it is quite conceivable that some families might be able to “break away” and be subject to their own Species Status Reviews if these Assessments, advances in keys, and the establishment of schemes help build up their record dataset. How were the provisional status ascriptions arrived at? 4 Unlike the formal IUCN Species Status Review reports which are founded on a data table demonstrating hectad or tetrad count changes between defined time periods, these Assessment rely on specialist opinion. This is a direct reflection of the amount of data held for most of these species. Some of the opinions on particular flies will, of course, prove to be accurate and long-standing, and others will not: only an increase in available data will improve accuracy. The IUCN category labels are used so as to avoid creating of a new, untested hierarchy, the
Recommended publications
  • Lakes in Relation to Geological Features 505
    LAKES IN RELATION TO GEOLOGICAL FEATURES 505 Eilean Subhainn, is U-shaped, the deepest portion occurring where the valley is most constricted, between Ben Slioch (3217 feet) on the north and Meall a' Ghubhais (2882 feet) on the south. Between Regoilachy and Coppachy the effect of a branch fault in weakening the strata is shown by the widening of the basin and the loop of the 250-ft. contour line in that portion of the lake. The Ardlair basin, beyond the islands, is a composite one. The north-west portion, north of Rudh' Aird an Anail, is situated in the line of the great shatter-belt, and is U-shaped; but the wider and deeper part of the same basin, lying between that promontory and Eilean Ruairidh M6r, is evidently due to the removal of comparatively weak strata, consisting of the lowest division of the Torridon Sand- stone, from the old floor of Lewisian Gneiss on which it was deposited. The Slattadale basin rests in Torridonian strata, belonging partly to the Applecross grits and partly to the weaker beds of the Diabaig group. A striking feature of this part of the lake is the number and size of the islands, which are composed mostly of massive Torridon sandstones and grits. One of these, Eilean Subhainn, contains a rock-basin 64 feet in depth. The river Ewe, which drains the loch, has cut a channel through the 'deposits of the 50-ft. raised beach, and runs for about half a mile over Torridonian strata before entering the sea. Loch Maree evidently extended farther up the valley, but it has been silted up by the streams that converge near Kinlochewe.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Arthropods in Australia
    Classical Biological Contents Control of Arthropods Arthropod index in Australia General index List of targets D.F. Waterhouse D.P.A. Sands CSIRo Entomology Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research Canberra 2001 Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index List of targets The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. Its primary mandate is to help identify agricultural problems in developing countries and to commission collaborative research between Australian and developing country researchers in fields where Australia has special competence. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by the Centre. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This peer-reviewed series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on the Third World. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia Waterhouse, D.F. and Sands, D.P.A. 2001. Classical biological control of arthropods in Australia. ACIAR Monograph No. 77, 560 pages. ISBN 0 642 45709 3 (print) ISBN 0 642 45710 7 (electronic) Published in association with CSIRO Entomology (Canberra) and CSIRO Publishing (Melbourne) Scientific editing by Dr Mary Webb, Arawang Editorial, Canberra Design and typesetting by ClarusDesign, Canberra Printed by Brown Prior Anderson, Melbourne Cover: An ichneumonid parasitoid Megarhyssa nortoni ovipositing on a larva of sirex wood wasp, Sirex noctilio. Back Forward Contents Arthropod index General index Foreword List of targets WHEN THE CSIR Division of Economic Entomology, now Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Entomology, was established in 1928, classical biological control was given as one of its core activities.
    [Show full text]
  • CYCLING Stewartry
    CYCLING in and around Stewartry The natural place to cycle See also:- - Cycling Signposted Routes in Dumfries and Galloway - Sustrans Maps www.sustrans.org.uk - The National Byway Map www.thenationalbyway.org.uk Particular thanks to John Taylor CTC for route and text contributions and for photographs. Photographs also by Alan Devlin and Dumfries and Galloway Tourist Board This publication has been, designed and funded by a partnership of: Supported by Solway Heritage through the Landfill Tax Credit Scheme A Message from the Health Improvement Group Cycling can seriously improve your health & happiness. Enjoy! CYCLING IN STEWARTRY This booklet is one of a series of four covering the whole of Dumfries & Galloway that suggest a variety of cycle tours for visitors and locals of all abilities. Local cycling enthusiasts, using their knowledge of the quieter roads, cycle routes and byways, have researched the routes to provide an interesting and rewarding taste of the region. A note of distance, time, terrain and facilities is given at the start of each route. All start points offer parking, toilets, snack places and accommodation. Some routes include stretches off-tarmac and this is indicated at the start of the route. Parking discs are required for some car parks and these are available at Tourist Information Centres and in local shops. Stewartry is part of the old province of Galloway. In those centuries when the easiest way to travel any distance was by sea, it held a strategic place on the west coast, Irish and Isle of Man routes. This explains the many archaeological remains near the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Tachinid Times Issue 29
    Walking in the Footsteps of American Frontiersman Daniel Boone The Tachinid Times Issue 29 Exploring Chile Curious case of Girschneria Kentucky tachinids Progress in Iran Tussling with New Zealand February 2016 Table of Contents ARTICLES Update on New Zealand Tachinidae 4 by F.-R. Schnitzler Teratological specimens and the curious case of Girschneria Townsend 7 by J.E. O’Hara Interim report on the project to study the tachinid fauna of Khuzestan, Iran 11 by E. Gilasian, J. Ziegler and M. Parchami-Araghi Tachinidae of the Red River Gorge area of eastern Kentucky 13 by J.E. O’Hara and J.O. Stireman III Landscape dynamics of tachinid parasitoids 18 by D.J. Inclán Tachinid collecting in temperate South America. 20 Expeditions of the World Tachinidae Project. Part III: Chile by J.O. Stireman III, J.E. O’Hara, P. Cerretti and D.J. Inclán 41 Tachinid Photo 42 Tachinid Bibliography 47 Mailing List 51 Original Cartoon 2 The Tachinid Times Issue 29, 2016 The Tachinid Times February 2016, Issue 29 INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Chief Editor JAMES E. O’HARA This newsletter accepts submissions on all aspects of tach- InDesign Editor SHANNON J. HENDERSON inid biology and systematics. It is intentionally maintained as a non-peer-reviewed publication so as not to relinquish its status as Staff JUST US a venue for those who wish to share information about tachinids in an informal medium. All submissions are subjected to careful ISSN 1925-3435 (Print) editing and some are (informally) reviewed if the content is thought to need another opinion. Some submissions are rejected because ISSN 1925-3443 (Online) they are poorly prepared, not well illustrated, or excruciatingly bor- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Site Management Plan
    The Management Plan for Cairnsmore of Fleet National Nature Reserve 2016-2026 For further information on Cairnsmore of Fleet National Nature Reserve: The Reserve Manager Scottish Natural Heritage Greystone Park 55/57 Moffat Road Dumfries DG1 1NP Tel: 0300 067 200 Email: [email protected] The Management Plan for Cairnsmore of Fleet National Nature Reserve 2016-2026 The Management Plan for Cairnsmore of Fleet National Nature Reserve 2016-2026 Foreword Cairnsmore of Fleet National Nature Reserve (NNR) is in the Stewartry District of Dumfries and Galloway, approximately 10 km from Gatehouse of Fleet and 8km from Creetown on the scenic B796 road. The National Nature Reserve covers the large area of open hill stretching from the Big Water of Fleet to the summit of Cairnsmore. The reserve is one of a suite of NNRs in Scotland. Scotland’s NNRs are special places for nature, where some of the best examples of Scotland’s wildlife are managed. Every NNR is carefully managed both for nature and for people, giving visitors the opportunity to experience our rich natural heritage. Cairnsmore of Fleet NNR offers a true taste of the Scottish uplands; it is one of the most southerly of the Galloway Hills standing above Wigtown Bay. At its heart it is one of the remotest parts of south-west Scotland. The moorland is dominated by an imposing granite hill, shaped and sculpted by the elements. The summit offers superb views over the Cree Estuary, and views south to the Lake District and the Isle of Man, west to Ireland and north to Ayrshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipas in Scotland • 2
    IPAs in Scotland • 2 • 5 • 6 • 3 • 4 • 15 • 10 • 11 • 14 • 16 • 12 • 13 • 9 • 7 • 8 • 17 • 19 • 21 • 26 • 29 • 23 • 25 • 27 31 • • 33 • 18 • 28 • 32 • 24 • 20 • 22 • 30 • 40 • 34 • 39 • 41 • 45 • 35 • 37 • 38 • 44 • 36 • 43 • 42 • 47 • 46 2 Contents Contents • 1 4 Foreword 6 Scotland’s IPAs: facts and figures 12 Protection and management 13 Threats 14 Land use 17 Planning and land use 18 Land management 20 Rebuilding healthy ecosystems 21 Protected areas Code IPA name 22 Better targeting of 1 Shetland 25 Glen Coe and Mamores resources and support 2 Mainland Orkney 26 Ben Nevis and the 24 What’s next for 3 Harris and Lewis Grey Corries Scotland’s IPAs? 4 Ben Mor, Assunt/ 27 Rannoch Moor 26 The last word Ichnadamph 28 Breadalbane Mountains 5 North Coast of Scotland 29 Ben Alder and Cover – Glen Coe 6 Caithness and Sutherland Aonach Beag ©Laurie Campbell Peatlands 30 Crieff Woods 7 Uists 31 Dunkeld-Blairgowrie 8 South West Skye Lochs 9 Strathglass Complex 32 Milton Wood 10 Sgurr Mor 33 Den of Airlie 11 Ben Wyvis 34 Colonsay 12 Black Wood of Rannoch 35 Beinn Bheigier, Islay 13 Moniack Gorge 36 Isle of Arran 14 Rosemarkie to 37 Isle of Cumbrae Shandwick Coast 38 Bankhead Moss, Beith 15 Dornoch Firth and 39 Loch Lomond Woods Morrich More 40 Flanders Moss 16 Culbin Sands and Bar 41 Roslin Glen 17 Cairngorms 42 Clearburn Loch 18 Coll and Tiree 43 Lochs and Mires of the 19 Rum Ale and Ettrick Waters 20 Ardmeanach 44 South East Scotland 21 Eigg Basalt Outcrops 22 Mull Oakwoods 45 River Tweed 23 West Coast of Scotland 46 Carsegowan Moss 24 Isle of Lismore 47 Merrick Kells Citation Author Plantlife (2015) Dr Deborah Long with editorial Scotland’s Important comment from Ben McCarthy.
    [Show full text]
  • Rucksack Club Completions Iss:25 22Jun2021
    Rucksack Club Completions Iss:25 22Jun2021 Fore Name SMC List Date Final Hill Notes No ALPINE 4000m PEAKS 1 Eustace Thomas Alp4 1929 2 Brian Cosby Alp4 1978 MUNROS 277 Munros & 240 Tops &13 Furth 1 John Rooke Corbett 4 Munros 1930-Jun29 Buchaile Etive Mor - Stob Dearg possibly earlier MunroTops 1930-Jun29 2 John Hirst 9Munros 1947-May28 Ben More - Mull Paddy Hirst was #10 MunroTops 1947 3 Edmund A WtitattakerHodge 11Munros 1947 4 G Graham MacPhee 20Munros 1953-Jul18 Sail Chaorainn (Tigh Mor na Seilge)?1954 MuroTops 1955 5 Peter Roberts 112Munros 1973-Mar24 Seana Braigh MunroTops 1975-Oct Diollaid a'Chairn (544 tops in 1953 Edition) Munros2 1984-Jun Sgur A'Mhadaidh Munros3 1993-Jun9 Beinn Bheoil MunroFurth 2001 Brandon 6 John Mills 120Munros 1973 Ben Alligin: Sgurr Mhor 7 Don Smithies 121Munros 1973-Jul Ben Sgritheall MunroFurth 1998-May Galty Mor MunroTops 2001-Jun Glas Mheall Mor Muros2 2005-May Beinn na Lap 8 Carole Smithies 192Munros 1979-Jul23 Stuc a Chroin Joined 1990 9 Ivan Waller 207Munros 1980-Jun8 Bidean a'choire Sheasgaich MunroTops 1981-Sep13 Carn na Con Du MunroFurth 1982-Oct11 Brandom Mountain 10 Stan Bradshaw 229Munros 1980 MunroTops 1980 MunroFurth 1980 11 Neil Mather 325Munros 1980-Aug2 Gill Mather was #367 Munros2 1996 MunroFurth 1991 12 John Crummett 454Munros 1986-May22 Conival Joined 1986 after compln. MunroFurth 1981 MunroTops 1986 13 Roger Booth 462Munros 1986-Jul10 BeinnBreac MunroFurth 1993-May6 Galtymore MunroTops 1996-Jul18 Mullach Coire Mhic Fheachair Munros2 2000-Dec31 Beinn Sgulaird 14 Janet Sutcliffe 544Munros
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in the Intensity and Prevalence of Macroparasites in Migratory Caribou: a Quasi-Circumpolar Study
    Canadian Journal of Zoology Variation in the intensity and prevalence of macroparasites in migratory caribou: a quasi-circumpolar study Journal: Canadian Journal of Zoology Manuscript ID cjz-2015-0190.R2 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the Author: 21-Mar-2016 Complete List of Authors: Simard, Alice-Anne; Université Laval, Département de biologie et Centre d'études nordiques Kutz, Susan; University of Calgary Ducrocq, Julie;Draft Calgary University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Beckmen, Kimberlee; Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Wildlife Conservation Brodeur, Vincent; Ministère des Forêts, de la Faune et des Parcs, Direction de la gestion de la faune du Nord-du-Québec Campbell, Mitch; Government of Nunavut, Department of Environment Croft, Bruno; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Cuyler, Christine; Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Davison, Tracy; Government of the Northwest Territories in Inuvik, Department of ENR Elkin, Brett; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Giroux, Tina; Athabasca Denesuline Né Né Land Corporation Kelly, Allicia; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Russell, Don; Environnement Canada Taillon, Joëlle; Université Laval, Département de biologie et Centre d'études nordiques Veitch, Alasdair; Government of the Northwest Territories, Environment and Natural Resources Côté, Steeve D.; Université Laval, Département de Biologie and Centre of Northern Studies COMPARATIVE < Discipline, parasite, caribou, Rangifer tarandus, helminth, Keyword: arthropod, monitoring https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjz-pubs Page 1 of 46 Canadian Journal of Zoology 1 Variation in the intensity and prevalence of macroparasites in migratory caribou: a quasi-circumpolar study Alice-Anne Simard, Susan Kutz, Julie Ducrocq, Kimberlee Beckmen, Vincent Brodeur, Mitch Campbell, Bruno Croft, Christine Cuyler, Tracy Davison, Brett Elkin, Tina Giroux, Allicia Kelly, Don Russell, Joëlle Taillon, Alasdair Veitch, Steeve D.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 NTS
    GLENSHERO WIND FARM Environmental Impact Assessment Report 2018 Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary Glenshero Wind Farm Environmental Impact Assessment Report Simec Wind One Ltd and RES Ltd 1 Introduction 1.1.1 SIMEC Wind One Ltd (the Applicant) has applied for consent1 to construct and operate a 39 turbine wind farm at a site located approximately 8 km west of the village of Laggan, in the Highlands (hereafter referred to as the proposed development) (Figure 1: Site Location). 1.1.2 The Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) has been prepared by RES Limited (RES) and Ramboll Environment and Health UK Limited (Ramboll) on behalf of the Applicant to accompany the application for consent. 1.2 Purpose of the Non-Technical Summary 1.2.1 The purpose of the EIAR is to report on the potential for significant environmental effects as a result of the proposed development, and to specify mitigation to avoid or reduce significant environmental effects. The EIAR comprises the following volumes: Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary (NTS); Volume 2: Main Report; Volume 3: Figures; and Volume 4: Technical Appendices. 1.2.2 Additional documents that will be submitted with this application include: Socio-economic & Tourism Impact Assessment; Planning Statement, which includes a Design and Access Statement (Appendix 3 of the Planning Statement); Pre-application Consultation Report; and Cover Letter, confirming deposit locations for the EIAR. 1.2.3 This document provides a Non-Technical Summary (NTS) of the EIAR. 1.2.4 The aim of the NTS is to summarise the content and main findings of the EIAR in a clear and concise manner to assist the public in understanding what the significant environmental effects of the proposed development are likely to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of Finland 369 Doi: 10.3897/Zookeys.441.7527 CHECKLIST Launched to Accelerate Biodiversity Research
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 369–382 (2014)Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland 369 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7527 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland Verner Michelsen1 1 Natural History Museum of Denmark (Zoological Museum), Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Corresponding author: Verner Michelsen ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 15 March 2014 | Accepted 8 May 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/4946FF28-E271-4E73-BFE5-12B71572C9F3 Citation: Michelsen V (2014) Checklist of the family Anthomyiidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 369–382. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7527 Abstract An updated checklist of the the genera and species of Anthomyiidae (Diptera) found in Finland is provided. Keywords Checklist, Finland, Diptera, Anthomyiidae Introduction The family Anthomyiidae is a large and taxonomically difficult group of flies that has for the same reason suffered from unstable taxonomy and nomenclature. A checklist of the anthomyiid species known from pre-war Finland was compiled by their leading regional specialist of calyptrate flies Lauri Tiensuu (1906−1980) and published in Frey et al. (1941). The Anthomyiidae were then not recognized as a separate family but combined with the fanniid and true muscid flies in a comprehensive Muscidae fam- ily equivalent of the present Muscoidea less Scathophagidae. Tiensuu’s list included confirmed records of 199 anthomyiid species classified in 41 genera and subgenera. No less than 34% of the species names and 58% of the genus-group names in that list are Copyright Verner Michelsen.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Vitosha Mountain
    Historia naturalis bulgarica 26: 1–66 ISSN 0205-3640 (print) | ISSN 2603-3186 (online) • http://www.nmnhs.com/historia-naturalis-bulgarica/ publication date [online]: 17 May 2018 The Dipterans (Insecta: Diptera) of the Vitosha Mountain Zdravko Hubenov Abstract. A total of 1272 two-winged species that belong to 58 families has been reported from theVitosha Mt. The Tachinidae (208 species or 16.3%) and Cecidomyiidae (138 species or 10.8%) are the most numerous. The greatest number of species has been found in the mesophylic and xeromesophylic mixed forests belt (707 species or 55.6%) and in the northern part of the mountain (645 species or 50.7%). The established species belong to 83 areographical categories. The dipterous fauna can be divided into two main groups: 1) species with Mediterranean type of distribution (53 species or 4.2%) – more thermophilic and distributed mainly in the southern parts of the Palaearctic; seven species of southern type, distributed in the Palaearctic and beyond it, can be formally related to this group as well; 2) species with Palaearctic and Eurosiberian type of distribution (1219 species or 95.8%) – more cold-resistant and widely distributed in the Palaearctic; 247 species of northern type, distributed in the Palaearctic and beyond it, can be formally related to this group as well. The endemic species are 15 (1.2%). The distribution of the species according to the zoogeographical categories in the vegetation belts and the distribution of the zoogeographical categories in each belt are considered. The dipteran fauna of the Vitosha Mt. is compared to this of the Rila and Pirin Mountains.
    [Show full text]