DOCSLIB.ORG

2014 CA-CHPS Criteria V1.02

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014 CA-CHPS Criteria V1.02 Assessment Tool (2016 CA Code – Title 24 Parts 6 and 11 Compliant) DEVELOPED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: California CHPS Criteria 2014 Edition V1.02 (2016 CA Code – Title 24 Parts 6 and 11 Compliant) ® CALIFORNIA – CA-CHPS CRITERIA © 2014-2017 CHPS, INC 2 Disclaimer IMPORTANT NOTICE TO THE READER: This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard to the subject matter covered. It is distributed with the understanding that local, state and federal laws, regulations and requirements will vary based on the particular circumstances such as building characteristics, geographic region and similar factors. It is also distributed with the understanding the publisher is not engaged in rendering engineering, architectural, legal, or other professional advice or service. The publisher and its participants, officers, directors, employees, contractors and affiliates cannot be responsible for errors or omissions, or any material set forth or referenced in this publication. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent advisor familiar with the law, regulation, practices and circumstances of the project should be sought. All rights reserved. Published 2014, Revised 2017, www.chps.net Cover: Image courtesy of Lionakis Franklin High School, Stockton, CA CHPS VerifiedTM project, 2013 Photo credit Tim Maloney, Technical Imagery Studios ® CALIFORNIA – CA-CHPS CRITERIA © 2014-2017 CHPS, INC 3 ERRATA Update #1: January 23, 2015: 1. Updated Table numbering to be in numerical order. 2. Edited references to Table numbers in the text for accuracy. 3. In Credit 16.1, revised reference ASHRAE 62.1-2013 to 62.1-2010 for consistency in the document. 4. Updated SS 5.1 to reflect allocation of 2 points rather than 1. 5. Updated broken link to Parade Magazine article. 6. Added verbiage related to the Effective Date in the Introduction. 7. Corrected “The bare minimum rating for walls separating classrooms” in EQ 14.0 Table 9. 8. Corrected STC ratings for Doors with “PAC, APS – Corridor” adjacency in EQ 14.0 and EQ 14.1. 9. Removed MW 4.1.2. 10. In EQ 3.0 added verbiage describing the requirements in CALGreen Section 5.407. 11. Removed reference to Interior Lighting in SS 12.1. Update #2: January 1, 2017: Edited for compatibility with 2016 CA Codes – Title 24 Parts 6 and 11, to incorporate 2016 revisions to the CHPS National Core Criteria, and address inadvertent errors. A. CA Title 24 Parts 6 and 11 Updates: 1. II 1.0 – Added new Title 24 requirement 2. EQ 1.0 – Removed reference to CALGreen Section 5.506.2 (not adopted by DSA). Moved reference to CALGreen Section 5.505.1 to EQ 5.0. 3. EQ 5.0 – Added reference to CALGreen Section 5.504.3 for pollutant control. 4. EQ 7.0 - Revised language for clarification purposes and consistency with CALGreen. 5. EQ 11.0 – Removed reference to CALGreen. 6. EQ 14.0 – Revised language for clarification purposes, and fixed corrected section numbering. 7. EE 1.0/1.1 – Updated to reference 2016 Title 24. Updated zEPI numbers to reflect percentage better than 2016 code. 8. EE 2.0 – Renamed to “Solar Ready” to better align with the CA Energy Code. Included code compliance manual language for better guidance and clarity on Documentation Requirements. 9. EE 2.1 – Clarified the requirement to use source energy to determine compliance. 10. EE 3.0 - Removed reference to CALGreen Sections 5.410.2 and 5410.4 (not adopted by DSA). 11. EE 5.0 – Updated Title 24 references. 12. EE 6.2 – Renumbered as EE 9.0/9.1 to reflect new Title 24 requirement in Section 140.4. Revised language to align with CA Energy Code and reflect the intent of the credit. 13. WE 1.0 – Updated referenced CALGreen Sections to 5.303.3 and 5.303.6. 14. WE 2.0 – Removed the prerequisite as a result of removing reference to CALGreen. No current CALGreen requirement to reduce potable water usage for sewage conveyance beyond what is included in WE 1.0. 15. WE 3.0/3.1 – Added reference to CALGreen Section 5.304.6, Revised language accordingly. Removed calculations in the implementation section as they are not current. Added reference to the DSA “Landscape Documentation Package”. 16. WE 4.1 - Removed calculations in the implementation section as they are not current. Added reference to the DSA “Landscape Documentation Package”. 17. WE 5.1 - Added reference to the DSA “Landscape Documentation Package”. 18. SS 5.0/5.1 – Created Prerequisite SS 5.0 to reference CALGreen Section 5.106.10. ® CALIFORNIA – CA-CHPS CRITERIA © 2014-2017 CHPS, INC 4 19. SS 11.1.1 – Updated the Low-Slope Roof SRI value for compliance with the CALGreen Tier 2 requirements, for consistency with the High-Slope Roof SRI value already compliant. 20. MW 1.0/1/1 – Added reference to CALGreen Section 5.410.1 for new construction. Added “organic waste” to Condition 2 for additions/modernizations for consistency with CALGreen. B. CHPS National Core Criteria Updates: 21. WE 3.1 – Clarified that the credit is applicable to both recreational and non-recreational landscaping as intended. (Also see Errata #2, Section A, Item #15.) 22. MW 7.1 – Environmental Product Declarations: Credit title changed from Multi-Attribute Material Selection to Environmental Product Declarations. 23. MW 10.1 – Building Product Health Related Information Reporting: Modified credit title and content to allow for additional pathways for compliance beyond the Health Product Declaration (HPD). C. General Errata: 24. Point allocation corrections for consistency: EQ 1.0 = 8 points, EQ 5.0 = 7 points, EQ 5.1 = 1 point, EQ 10.1 = 2 points, EQ 10.2 = 2 points. 25. Table 5, EQ 11.0 clarified to indicate that this prerequisite is only required for Renovation/Modernization projects where the Envelope is improved. 26. Added Implementation language for EQ 5.0 “Mold Prevention.” 27. Removed EQ 5.1.2 as this credit is already included in EQ 5.0. The EQ 5.0 and EQ 5.1 points were adjusted to reflect this. 28. Clarified that both EQ 5.0 and EQ 5.1 are applicable for all projects. 29. Updated EQ 5.0 and EQ 5.1 Documentation Requirements for completeness. ® CALIFORNIA – CA-CHPS CRITERIA © 2014-2017 CHPS, INC 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ERRATA ............................................................................................................................................... 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 11 Making Every School an Ideal Place to Learn .................................................................................................................. 11 Priority Outcomes of the CHPS National Core Criteria ................................................................................................... 12 CHPS Core Criteria Framework ......................................................................................................................................... 12 CA-CHPS Criteria Organization ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Eligibility Levels .................................................................................................................................................................. 17 Renovation/Modernization Projects .................................................................................................................................. 19 CHPS Recognition .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 INTEGRATION ................................................................................................................................... 27 II 1.0 – Integrated Design .................................................................................................................................................... 27 II 1.1 – Enhanced Integrated Design ................................................................................................................................. 28 II 2.1 – District Level Commitment .................................................................................................................................... 31 II 3.1 – School Master Plan ................................................................................................................................................. 33 II 4.1 – High Performance Transition Plan ........................................................................................................................ 35 II 5.0 – Educational Display ................................................................................................................................................ 37 II 6.1 – Educational Integration .......................................................................................................................................... 39 II 7.1 – Demonstration Area ................................................................................................................................................ 41 II 8.1 – Climate Change Action / Carbon Footprint Reporting ........................................................................................ 43 II 9.1 – Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Electromagnetic Fields
    ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS Measure: Why? • Measurement determines whether the • Measurement gives facts. For example, limit values for electromagnetic radiation public protection: On site measurements specified in laws, national regulations, and show the actual exposure levels. This can recommendations are being adhered to. help to allay unfounded anxiety, and can This is essential for occupational safety and be used to initiate further preventive action to protect the general public. – even if the values are well below the permitted limits. • Measurement gives reassurance. It is the most important step in effective protection. • Measurement makes sure. For instance, Take maintenance work on an antenna when planning high tension transmission array, for example: Are the transmitters lines or antenna arrays, spot check measure- switched off? Or is the field strength safe? ments show whether the field strength Do the actual values agree with the theor- simulation used in planning corres ponds to etical ones? reality. MEASURE: WHY? Measure: How? • Only standard-compliant measurements • Non-directional (isotropic) measurement is provide comparable, reproducible, and demanded by the standards. legally defensible results. • The permitted field strengths depend on • The measurement results must be under- the frequency. The measuring instrument standable, even for someone who is not must therefore be sensitive enough, have constantly concerned with electromagnetic a wide dynamic range, and be capable of fields. frequency selective field strength evaluation complying with regulations. • The electric and magnetic fields must be measured separately in the near field. • If the field strength is high or unknown, fit the instrument on a tripod and measure by remote control. MEASURE: HOW? Measure right! • Measurement means comparison with a known quantity.
    [Show full text]
  • (5G) Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Measurement and Maximum Power Extrapolation for Human Exposure Assessment
    environments Article Experimental Procedure for Fifth Generation (5G) Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Measurement and Maximum Power Extrapolation for Human Exposure Assessment Daniele Franci 1,*, Stefano Coltellacci 1, Enrico Grillo 1, Settimio Pavoncello 1, Tommaso Aureli 1, Rossana Cintoli 1 and Marco Donald Migliore 2,3 1 ARPA Lazio (Agenzia per la Protezione Ambientale del Lazio), Via G. Saredo 52, 00172 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (E.G.); [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (T.A.); [email protected] (R.C.) 2 DIEI (Dipartimento di Ingegeria Elettrica e dell’Informazione “Maurizio Scarano”)—University of Cassino and Southern Lazio, via G. Di Biasio 43,03043 Cassino, Italy; [email protected] 3 ICEmB(Inter-University National Research Center on Interactions Between Electromagnetic Fields and Biosystems), Via All’Opera Pia, 11 A, 16145 Genova GE, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 January 2020; Accepted: 13 March 2020; Published: 17 March 2020 Abstract: The fifth generation (5G) technology has been conceived to cover multiple usage scenarios from enhanced mobile broadband to ultra-reliable low-latency communications (URLLC) to massive machine type communications. However, the implementation of this new technology is causing increasing concern over the possible impact on health and safety arising from exposure to electromagnetic field radiated by 5G systems, making imperative the development of accurate electromagnetic field (EMF) measurement techniques and protocols. Measurement techniques used to assess the compliance with EMF exposure limits are object to international regulation. The basic principle of the assessment is to measure the power received from a constant radio frequency source, typically a pilot signal, and to apply a proper extrapolation factor.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CONCEPT of ELECTRON ACTIVITY and ITS RELATION to REDOX POTENTIALS in AQUEOUS GEOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS by Donald C
    THE CONCEPT OF ELECTRON ACTIVITY AND ITS RELATION TO REDOX POTENTIALS IN AQUEOUS GEOCHEMICAL SYSTEMS by Donald C. Thorstenson U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 84 072 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM T. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: Regional Research Hydrologist U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch Water Resources Division Open-File Services Section 432 National Center Box 25425, Federal Center Reston, Virginia 22092 Denver, Colorado 80225 ERRATA: (p. 1) 1. Equation (2), p. 3, should read: n 2.30RT 1 n 2.30RT , x = Ej? + _____ log__= E° + _____pH . (2) 2. Table 1, p. 6, entry 5, should read: In pure water, p e - 6.9; 3. Line 3, paragraph 3, p. 10 should read: As Fe^+ / aa \ is converted to Fe ( aa ) via equation (15) to 4. Equation (22), p. 13, should read: a n p - anya n+ e (aq) UA (aq) K = . (22) 5. Equation (38), p. 18, should read: F -log ae - = _______ Eh + . (38) ( acl) 2.303RT 2.303RT 6. Equation (52), p. 23, should read: ae- (aq) 7. Equation (53), p. 23, should read: pe s +6.9 and Eh s + 0.41 volt. (53) 8. Equation (54c), p. 23, should read: nu-'e ~ 10 -55.5 (aq) ERRATA: (p. 2) 9. The second line from the bottom, p. 28, should read: ....... (a state that has been maintained for * 105 years based on .... 10. The heading of Table 2, p.
    [Show full text]
  • European Information System on Electromagnetic Fields Exposure and Health Impacts
    European Information System on Electromagnetic Fields Exposure and Health Impacts On behalf of DG SANCO Final Report February, 2005 EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Health and Consumer Protection Physical and Chemical Exposure Unit http://www.jrc.cec.eu.int/eis-emf EIS-EMF Project Final report Legal notice Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use, which might be made of the following information. 1 EIS-EMF Project Final report 2 EIS-EMF Project Final report Organisation responsible of the project: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Physical and Chemical Exposure Unit, Ispra, Italy (JRC/IHCP/PCE). Project leader: Dr. Demosthenes Papameletiou, JRC/IHCP/PCE Sources of funding: DG Health and Consumer Protection (SANCO) and JRC/IHCP/PCE Sub-contractor: Seibersdorf Research, Austrian Research Centers Preparation of documents: All working drafts and this final report were prepared by the Joint Research Centre (Institute for Health and Consumer Protection, Physical and Chemical Exposure Unit), and with individual contributions and advice in the course of the work from members of the EIS-EMF Advisory Board and national supporting experts. The “Status report on national sources of RF exposure of the general population” was prepared together by Seiberdorf Research and the JRC/IHCP/PCE. Final drafting: Dr. Carlos del Pozo and Dr. Demosthenes Papameletiou, both at JRC/IHCP/PCE Advisory
    [Show full text]
  • Data Collected and Reviewed Regarding a Health Study for People Living Near a Nuclear Facility
    04-0138 Data Collected and Reviewed Regarding a Health Study for People Living Near a Nuclear Facility Report to the Minnesota Legislature 2004 Minnesota Department of Health February 9, 2004 MIN NE SOT A Commissioner's Office 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 400 P.O. Box 64882 St. Paul, MN 55164-0882 ~ ~ (651)215-1300 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH www.hea1th.state.mn.us Data Collected and Reviewed Regarding a Health Study for People Living Near a Nuclear Facility February 9, 2004 For more information, contact: Environmental Health Division/Radiation Control Unit Minnesota Department of Health 1645 Energy Park Drive P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 Phone: (651) 643-2151 Fax: (651) 643-2152 TDD: (651) 215~0707 This report is produced as required by Minnesota Session Laws 2003, 1st Special Session, Chapter 11, Article 1, Sec. 5. As requested by Minnesota Statute 3.197: This report cost approximately $1,000 to prepare, including stafftime, printing and mailing expenses. Upon request, this material will be made available in an alternative format such as large print, Braille or cassette tape. Printed on recycled paper. Dear Interested Party: .The 2003 1st Special Session Chapter 11 Article 1, Sec. 5 requested that the Commissioner of Health "review data collected by the department, and in the context ofother relevant information developed by the National Institutes of Health and other entities, report to the legislature by January 1, 2004 on whether a further health study funded by the owner of the Prairie Island nuclear facility is necessary." Based on discussions with the author of this Section, the data reviewed focused on exposure to electric and magnetic fields.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.4 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
    2.4 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2.4 Hazards and Hazardous Materials This section discusses potential impacts relating to hazards and hazardous materials resulting from the implementation of the Proposed Project. The analysis is based on the review of existing resources, technical data, and applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines, as well as the following technical reports prepared for the Proposed Project, in conformance with the County of San Diego (County) Report Requirements or other applicable standards. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Jacumba (Appendix 2.4-1) Draft Fire Protection Plan – Jacumba Solar Energy Project (Appendix 2.4-2) For a discussion on the Proposed Project’s impacts on public services, refer to Section 3.1.6, Public Services. This section is divided into an analysis of potential hazards to public safety and the environment related to hazardous materials, airports, emergency response and evacuation plans, and wildland fire. The discussion of hazards and hazardous materials describes sites with known hazardous materials contamination, sites with potential hazardous materials contamination, hazardous materials transportation, hazardous materials disposal, and hazardous materials release threats. The discussion of airports examines existing airport facilities and potential operational hazards within the County, and specifically within the Proposed Project area. The discussion of emergency response and evacuation plans identifies operations and plans that exist to protect lives and property in the event of a disaster within the County. The wildland fires analysis examines fire threat hazards, the potential for wild fires in the Proposed Project area wildland– urban interface areas and project impacts on fire and emergency services response times.
    [Show full text]
  • RUMPF MONADIZADEH S.Pdf
    AN ASSESSMENT OF PROTOCOLS AND GUIDELINES THAT ADDRESS THE EXPOSURE OF HUMANS TO EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD (ELF-EMF) RADIATION IN BUILDINGS By SHABNAM RUMPF-MONADIZADEH A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Shabnam Rumpf-Monadizadeh To my husband, Tilman Rumpf, our daughter, Hana Rumpf, and my parents, Tooran and David Monadizadeh ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my deepest thanks to Dr. Charles Kibert for his guidance and vision to support me along my doctoral path and especially in realizing the value of this research. I am particularly grateful for the assistance given by Dr. Jon Dobson who helped me to understand and be critical to the biological aspects of this research. Also, my special thanks to my committee members from Rinker School of Construction Management, Dr. Ian Flood, Dr. Ravi Srinivasan and Dr. Damon Allen who gave me educational and technical support to make this research possible. I also thank other Rinker school academic and administrative staff for their help and their support. I wish to acknowledge the help provided by a friend, Andreas Blank, who offered a valuable resource to accomplish the testing equipment. Finally, I would like to express my innermost gratitude to my family, Tilman and Hana Rumpf, who stood by me to seek my doctoral path and accomplish this eventful journey. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alarming Acidification How Ph Drops in Monterey Bay May Contribute to Proliferation of Dangerous Algal Blooms
    VOLUME 3, ISSUE 2 | FEBRUARY 2020 emerginginvestigators.org Alarming acidification How pH drops in Monterey Bay may contribute to proliferation of dangerous algal blooms Biases in malaise trap investigations Different attractants can affect the results of insect diversity studies Are young people more optimistic? Assessing the correlation between age and outlook Bubble behavior The peculiar phenomenon of sinking bubbles Does Wi-Fi affect insect reproduction? Looking into the impacts of electromagnetic fields on flies The Journal of Emerging Investigators is an open-access journal that publishes original research in the biological and physical sciences that is written by middle and high school students. JEI provides students, under the guidance of a teacher or advisor, the opportunity to submit and gain feedback on original research and to publish their findings in a peer- reviewed scientific journal. Because grade-school students often lack access to formal research institutions, we expect that the work submitted by students may come from classroom-based projects, science fair projects, or other forms of mentor-supervised research. JEI is a non-profit group run and operated by graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and professors across the United States. EXECUTIVE STAFF EDITORIAL TEAM Brandon Sit executive director Jamilla Akhund-Zade editor-in-chief Michael Mazzola coo Olivia Ho-Shing chief learning officer Qiyu Zhang treasurer Michael Marquis managing editor Caroline Palavacino-Maggio Laura Doherty managing editor director of outreach Chris Schwake managing editor Naomi Atkin head copy editor Eileen Ablondi head copy editor BOARD OF DIRECTORS Lisa Situ head copy editor Sarah Fankhauser, PhD Alexandra Was, PhD proofing manager Katie Maher, PhD Erika J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electromagnetic Field and People
    The electromagnetic field and people ON PHYSICS, BIOLOGY, MEDICINE, STANDARDS, AND THE 5G NETWORK We are pleased to present this publication, which discusses, in a compre- hensible manner, the most important issues related to the radio-frequency electromagnetic field. It is those fields that allow us to enjoy radio and television broadcasts and to use mobile phones. Thus, it is the basis for a trouble-free and fast flow of information, which is the foundation of our civilization nowadays. This publication is divided into four sections. The first three sections answer the most frequently asked questions about electromagnetic waves. What are they? What are their effects on the human body? How are they measured and what regulations apply to them? The fourth section briefly explains the relationship between the electromagnetic field and telecommunication, and what the next generation of cellular networks, i.e. 5G, is. We are sure that this publication will help everyone interested in this topic to understand what the electromagnetic field is and how we can use it for the good of Poland. We hope you will find it interesting! Ministry of Digital Affairs Project coordinator Publisher: Wojciech Hałka National Institute of Telecommunications Chief Editor ul. Szachowa 1 Łukasz Lamża 04-894 Warsaw, Poland tel. +48 22 5128 100 Assistant editor e-mail: [email protected] Łukasz Kwiatek www.itl.waw.pl Proofreading Maciej Szklarczyk © Copyright by Ministry of Digital Affairs, Warsaw 2020 Infographics Lech Mazurczyk Additional illustrations Paweł Woźniak The project is financed from Preparation: an earmarked grant funds National Institute Graphic design and typesetting of the Ministry of Digital Affairs of Telecommunications Adrian Hajda Print ACAD, Mirosław Przywózki ul.
    [Show full text]
  • Electromagnetic Pollution Assessment in Different Environments with Measurements and Modellings at Very Low Frequency
    Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Süleyman Demirel University Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences Cilt 21 3, 724-732, 2017 Volume 21, Issue 3, 724-732, 2017 , Sayı DOI: 10.19113/sdufbed.10441 Electromagnetic Pollution Assessment in Different Environments with Measurements and Modellings at Very Low Frequency Fulya ÇALLIALP KUNTER*1, Şaban Selim ŞEKER2 1 Marmara University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 34722 2Bogazici University, Engineering Faculty, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 34342 İstanbul İstanbul / Received: 06.09.2016, Kabul / Accepted: 04.07.2017, Online lanma / Published Online: 11.08.2017) (Alınış Yayın Keywords Abstract: A major factor of anxiety and speculation come from electromagnetic Electromagnetic fields, fields which represent one of the most common and fastest increasing Exposure assessment, environmental issues. The purpose of this work is to examine existing electric and Standards, magnetic fields’ levels in a typical house and an office at very low frequency, and Modeling comparing the measurement results with the prior studies and also with the ICNIRP standard limits. This study also comprises the three phase conductors’ electromagnetic fields analysis at a point. As a result, it is observed that the measured values are approaching to the calculated ones. Ölçümler ve Modellemelerle birlikte Farklı Çevrelerde Çok Düşük Frekanslarda Elektromanyetik Kirlilik Değerlendirmesi Anahtar Kelimeler Özet: Elektromanyetik alanlar, çevresel sorunlardan birini temsil eden elektromanyetik alanlardan Maruziyet d , Endişe ve spekülasyonların başlıca etkeni, en yaygıntipik ve birhızlı ev büyüyenve ofiste Standartlar, Modelleme eğerlendirmesi kaynaklanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı; çok düşük frekansta elektik ve manyetik alanların mevcut seviyelerini, ölçüm sonuçlarını daha önce yapılan çalışmalarla ve ICNIRP standart sınır değerleriyle karşılaştırarak araştırmaktır.
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2015 for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of EMF-Related Health Problems and Illnesses
    Rev Environ Health 2015; 30(4): 337–371 Igor Belyaev, Amy Dean, Horst Eger, Gerhard Hubmann, Reinhold Jandrisovits, Olle Johansson, Markus Kern, Michael Kundi, Piero Lercher, Wilhelm Mosgöller, Hanns Moshammer, Kurt Müller, Gerd Oberfeld*, Peter Ohnsorge, Peter Pelzmann, Claus Scheingraber and Roby Thill EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2015 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses DOI 10.1515/reveh-2015-0033 health effects, raising new challenges for medicine and Received October 1, 2015; accepted October 13, 2015 society. For instance, the issue of so-called non-thermal effects and potential long-term effects of low-dose expo- Abstract: Chronic diseases and illnesses associated sure were scarcely investigated prior to the introduction of with unspecific symptoms are on the rise. In addition to these technologies. Common EMF sources include Wi-Fi chronic stress in social and work environments, physi- access points, routers and clients, cordless and mobile cal and chemical exposures at home, at work, and during phones including their base stations, Bluetooth devices, leisure activities are causal or contributing environmen- ELF magnetic fields from net currents, ELF electric fields tal stressors that deserve attention by the general practi- from electric lamps and wiring close to the bed and office tioner as well as by all other members of the health care desk. On the one hand, there is strong evidence that long- community. It seems certainly necessary now to take “new term-exposure to certain EMF exposures is a risk factor exposures” like electromagnetic field (EMF) into account. for diseases such as certain cancers, Alzheimer’s disease Physicians are increasingly confronted with health prob- and male infertility.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Recent Research on EMF and Health Risk
    Author: SSM’s Scientific Council on Electromagnetic Fields Research 2018:09Recent Research on EMF and Health Risk Twelfth report from SSM’s Scientific Council on Electromagnetic Fields, 2017 Report number: 2018:09 ISSN: 2000-0456 Available at www.stralsakerhetsmyndigheten.se SSM 2018:09 SSM perspective Background The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority’s (SSM) Scientific Council on Electromagnetic Fields monitors current research on potential health risks with a correlation to exposure to electromagnetic fields, and provides the Authority with advice on assessing possible health risks. The Council gives guidance when the Authority must give an opinion on policy matters when scientific testing is necessary. The Council is required to submit a written report each year on the current research and knowledge situation. Objective The report has the objective of covering the previous year’s research in the area of electromagnetic fields (EMF). The report gives the Swedish Radiation Safety Authority an overview and provides an important basis for risk assessment. Results The present annual report is the twelfth in this series and covers studies published from October 2015 up to and including March 2017. The report covers differ- ent areas of EMF (static, low frequency, intermediate, and radio fre- quency fields) and different types of studies such as biological, human and epidemiological studies. No new health risks have been identified. Whether mobile phone use causes brain tumours or not was mainly addressed using time trends studies in the last two years. The results were not entirely consistent but mainly point towards a lack of association. Some cell and animal stud- ies indicate that EMF exposure may cause oxidative stress even at low exposure levels.
    [Show full text]