NATO UNCLASSIFIED
STATEMENT OF WORK AND TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR
GERMAN G-HADR 2000S TECHNICAL REFRESH
(NSPA/LD – 13 October 2020)
Version Control Version Date Comments Original 15 June 2020 Original release V2 14 September 2020 V3 15 September 2020 V4 13 October 2020
NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED
TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. NOTATION CONVENTIONS ......
1. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE ...... 1
2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS ...... 2
2.1. NATO STANDARDS AND PUBLICATIONS ...... 3 2.2. EQUIPMENT TECHNICAL MANUALS AND SURVEY REPORTS ...... 3 2.3. INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS ...... 4
3. CURRENT G-HADR 2000S SYSTEM ...... 4
3.1. RECEIVER/EXCITER (RX/EX) ...... 6 3.2. SYNTHESIZER ...... 6 3.3. DIGITIZER CHASSIS ...... 6 3.4. RADAR SIGNAL PROCESSOR (RSP) ...... 7 3.5. RADAR DATA PROCESSOR (RDP) ...... 7 3.6. MAINTENANCE CONTROL FUNCTION (MCF) ...... 7 3.7. RADAR EVALUATION TOOL (RET) ...... 7 3.8. DATABASE TOOL ...... 7 3.9. SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE FACILITY (SMF) ...... 7 3.10. TRAINING FACILITY (TF) ...... 8
4. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND CONTRACTOR’S TASKS ...... 8
5. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ...... 9
6. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION ...... 11
6.1. SYSTEM DESIGN ...... 11 6.2. CRITICAL DESIGN REVIEW (CDR) ...... 12 6.3. VERIFICATION AND ACCEPTANCE TEST (V&A-T) PLAN ...... 12 6.4. PRODUCTION OF THE G-HADR 2000S TECHNICAL REFRESH KITS ...... 13 6.5. DRY RUN TEST ...... 14 6.6. FACTORY ACCEPTANCE TEST (FAT) ...... 14 6.7. PRODUCTION ACCEPTANCE TEST (PAT) ...... 15 6.8. DELIVERY...... 15 6.9. LOGISTIC SUPPORT DELIVERABLES ...... 16 6.9.1 DOCUMENTATION ...... 16 6.9.2 CONFIGURATION ...... 16 6.9.3 SPARE PARTS ...... 17
7 ACCEPTANCE MILESTONES ...... 17
7.1. FACTORY ACCEPTANCE...... 17 7.2. FINAL ACCEPTANCE (FA) ...... 17
8. QUALITY ASSURANCE ...... 17
9. HEALTH AND SAFETY ...... 17
NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED
10. PROJECT MANAGEMENT ...... 18
10.1. MASTER SCHEDULE ...... 18 10.2. CONTROLS ...... 19
ANNEX 1: SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLE DATA, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ...... 21
ANNEX 2: ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ...... 23
ANNEX 3: SUMMARY OF THE HARDWARE TO BE PROCURED UNDER THIS SOW ...... 25
NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED
0. NOTATION CONVENTIONS
This document contains both a statement of work and a set of technical requirements for G- HADR Technical Refresh. Paragraphs stating deliverables and specifying requirements are preceded by an alphanumeric code in brackets with the following meaning: (Rx): States a generic requirement affecting all deliverables, where “x” is a serial number. (R.Tx): Specifies a technical requirement for the system, where “x” is a serial number. Technical requirements are given at Section 5 of this document. (Dx): States a requirement for the Contractor to deliver certain a product (including data products) or service, where “x” is a serial number. (R.Dx.y): Defines specific requirements related to the deliverable “Dx”, where “y” is a serial number. Deliverables and their associated requirements are stated in Sections 6 and 9 of this document. (R.Qx): Specifies quality assurance requirements, where “x” is a serial number. Quality assurance requirements are given in Section 8 of this document. Tables and bulleted lists following paragraphs stating deliverables or specifying requirements are part of the definition of the deliverable or requirement. Paragraphs not preceded by any of the codes listed above do not state outright deliverables or associated requirements, but contain essential information or may complete the definition of work and acceptance. They may also reflect actions which NSPA will perform. Acronyms and abbreviations are normally spelled out when they are used for the first time in the document. Annex 2 contains a list of acronyms and abbreviations used. “Customer” is to be understood as “NSPA” in its role as Procurement Agent and Contract Manager. “Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and in Service Support / German Air Force (BAAINBw /GAF)” is the End User for the equipment and responsible for the operations of the radars.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
1. OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE This document defines requirements for services and products to be provided by the Contractor to the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) for the technical Refresh of the G-HADR 2000S radar systems installed in Germany. These services and products shall be provided by the Contractor for the system design, development, prototyping, production of a solution to replace or update the electronic equipment listed below currently in use in the German G-HADR 2000S Systems.
The elements that shall be replaced or updated are: RSP assembly (Saab PN 190-018246-G001) which includes the RSPIO (Saab PN 130- 018296-G001) Digital Receiver (DRCV) assembly (Saab PN 130-019247-G001) in the Digitizer Chassis Radar Interface Board (RIB) assembly (Saab PN 130-018292-G010) in the Digitizer Chassis Synchronizer (SYNC) Board assembly (Saab PN 130-018292-G020) in the Digitizer Chassis RDP assembly (Saab PN 190-018247-G001) Rx/Ex assembly (Saab PN 170-018244-G001) Ethernet Switch (Saab PN 170-019364-G001) Maintenance Control Function (MCF) Radar Evaluation Tool (RET) (inc. Database Tool) Software Maintenance Facility (SMF) Trainings Facility (TF)
The necessary Software and Firmware updates as part of a Non-Recurring Engineering effort will allow the technology refreshes to be achieved.
The objective of the German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh is to extend the system life cycle through a technology refresh mitigating all the identified system obsolescence and improving system supportability.
The scope of this SoW includes all the necessary Non-Recurring Engineering (NRE) services to carry out the technology refreshes and the procurement of the necessary material with the exception of those parts of the hardware which are already under procurement via a NSPA separate contract that will be provided to the contractor as Government Furnished Equipment (GFE).
Table 1 below lists the relevant sites, where this Statement of Work is applicable:
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.1 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
Table 1. Site Applicability Country Site Name Location Type Germany RS Marienbaum Marienbaum Radar Site Germany RS Erbeskopf Erbeskopf Radar Site Germany RS Brockzetel Brockzetel Radar Site Germany RS Messstetten Messstetten Radar Site GAF Engineering Training Kaufbeuren Training Centre Germany Centre Germany GAF System Centre Erndtebrueck System Centre Control and Reporting Centre Erndtebrueck Germany Control and Reporting Centre (CRC) Schoenewalde Germany Deployable CRC (DCRC) Schoenewalde Deployable CRC
Figure 1: Indicative Block Diagram of G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
HADR 2000S Rack (Both Configuration) [red border and font are the Parts of the HADR 2000S Refresh]
Receiver / Exciter Digitizer Assy LRU (DIG) LRU [RE/EX] Digitizer Receiver Digitizer 60MHz LRU [DRCV] S-Band Output RE/EX RF Oscilator Board LRU -ADC [up- Fiber Optic I/F Radar Signal Processor SLB RE S-Band [DOSC] -Pulse Compression RSP converter / SUM -CCS Function -I/O LRU [A =SUM] down- SLB IF- to Baseband Main RE S-Band converter]
Fiber Optic I/F RSP Radar Signal Processor -I/O LRU [B =SLB]
RE/EX Passive Listener Control Digitizer Test Message I/F [ASTERIX 34/48] Dicrete Timing I/F Radar Data Processor LRU [RDP] STALO Synchronizer Board LRU Radar Interface 10MHz [SYNC] Board LRU [RIB]
LFM RE/EX I/F Synthesizer I/F DRES I/F MSSR 2000i Plot and Control RF-Detector Power RF Detector Power ASTERIX (7/18/34/48/253) for Supply LRU MSSR CH A and MSSR CH B
Encoder I/F Existing HADR Existing Hardware HADR Air Picture and HADR Control SSR Siemens 1990 I/F (Corba / ASTERIX 34/48) [Ethernet SW Output Fiber] BVP I/F (or MSSR 2000i corrected ACP/NRP) Ethernet Switch LRU RF-Detector I/F Final Amp. 1 I/F Final Amp. 2 I/F Waveguide Switch I/F GPS I/F GPS LRU To GPS Antenna Beam Steering Unit I/F
2. REFERENCE DOCUMENTS The following is a list of documents which are applicable to this Statement in their most current version or revision. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this SoW and any of the listed reference documents, the SoW shall prevail.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.2 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
(R1) The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that the newly designed equipment complies with all national and international applicable legal requirements.
2.1. NATO Standards and Publications a. AQAP-2009 (NATO Guidance for the use of the AQAP 2000 SERIES) b. AQAP-2105 (NATO Requirements for deliverable Quality Plans) c. AQAP-2110 (NATO Quality Assurance Requirements for Design, Development and Production) d. AQAP-2210 (NATO Supplementary Software QA Requirements to AQAP 2110) e. STANAG 4193 Technical Characteristics of the IFF Mk XIIA System Ed.3
2.2. Equipment Technical Manuals and Survey Reports f. Product Specification for the German Hughes Air Defense Radar (HADR)-2000S, Doc No. 700-017416, Version 4, Saab Defense and Security USA LLC (SDAS), g. Final Hughes Air Defense Radar (HADR)-2000S Product Description, Doc No. 700- 016642, Version 1, Saab Defense and Security USA LLC (SDAS) h. HADR-2000S, Maintenance and Control Function (MCF) User’s Manual, Document No. 730-020236, Version 3, Saab Sensis Corporation i. HADR-2000S Operation and Maintenance Manual (O&MM), Document No. 730- 017635, Version, 3, Saab Sensis Corporation j. HADR-2000S Radar Evaluation Tool (RET) User’s Manual, Document No. 780-017812, Version 1, 21 April 2009, Sensis Corporation k. G-HADR 2000S Software Requirements Specification (SRS) for the Radar Signal Processor (RSP), Document No. 700-018483, Version 3, 14 March 2012, Saab Sensis Corporation l. G-HADR 2000S Software Requirements Specification (SRS) for the Radar Data Processor (RDP), Document No. 700-018484, Version 4, 14 March 2012, Saab Sensis Corporation m. G-HADR 2000S Software Requirements Specification (SRS) for the Maintenance Control Function (MCF), Document No. 700-017622, Version 4, 22 February 2012, Saab Sensis Corporation n. G-HADR 2000S Software Requirements Specification (SRS) for the Radar Evaluation Tool (RET) Document No. 700-017623 Version 3, 13 April 2009, Sensis Corporation o. HADR System Performance Technical Memo for the German HADR (G-HADR) Upgrade, 18. August 2008, prepared by Sensis Corporation (Restricted Document) p. G-HADR 2000S Obsolescence Upgrade Whitepaper, Doc No 840-042625, Version 1.0, 14 October 2019, Saab Defense and Security USA LLC (SDAS) q. G-HADR-2000S System Performance Check (SPC) Acceptance Criteria, Version 5; 24 October 2018, Doc No 840-027965, Saab Defense and Security USA LLC (SDAS)
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.3 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
r. G-HADR-2000S Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) First Article Test (FAT) – Test Report, Document No. 930-034227, Version 1, September 11, 2012, Saab Sensis Corporation s. Bericht zur Performance Analyse des Sensors HADR MARIENBAUM zur Einrüstung des RF-Timing Upgrades 23.03. – 26.03.2015, Doc. No. 17.078.0200.00 TB V1; Rev. 11.06.2015, steep GmbH (compare: steep G-HADR Timing Mod Regression Test Document, 920-040366, v1)
2.3. International Standards and Specifications t. European Mode S Station Functional Specification (SUR/MODES/EMS/SPE-01), Edition 3.11, issued 9 May 2005 (and subsequent editions), including all the reference documents. u. Eurocontrol Standard Document for Surveillance data Exchange, Part 1; All Purpose Structured Eurocontrol Surveillance Information Exchange (ASTERIX), (SUR.ET1.ST05.2000-STD-01-01), Edition 1.29, issued Feb 2002 (and subsequent editions), including all the reference documents. v. MIL-STD-100, Engineering Drawings w. MIL-DTL-31000, Technical Data Packages x. AECTP100/200/300/400 (Allied Environmental Conditions and Test Publication) y. MIL-STD 1250, Corrosion control z. MIL-STD 961, Department of Defense Standard Practice for Defense Specifications aa. ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organization - Technical Characteristics of IFF MK XA and MK XII Interrogators and Transponders bb. Recommendation CCIT V29 cc. UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Revision and amend. 1, Part III, sub-section 38.3
3. CURRENT G-HADR 2000S SYSTEM The Hughes Air Defense Radar (HADR) is an S-Band 3D Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR) that serves the German Air Force (GAF) as an integral part of their long range air defence network. The German HADRs (G-HADR) were installed in the mid 1980’s. In the years 2008 until 2010 a technical upgrade took place for the four G-HADRs. While maintaining most of the original operational and performance requirements the modified radars provide:
improved target angle centroid accuracy and range resolution full-radar-resolution clutter mapping moving Target Indicator (MTI)/pulsed Doppler processing for Sidelobe Blanking (SLB) channels increased signal processor dynamic range all-digital pulse compression medium Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF) waveforms with range ambiguity resolution
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.4 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
dual pulse frequency diversity and automatic radar mode selection by radar azimuth sector The G-HADR 2000S interfaces to the original HADR system at S-Band. The interfaces to the radar hardware are realized by the System Interface Board (SIB). The SIB converts the military interfaces (connectors) into COTS interfaces for further processing in the HADR 2000S rack. The main components in the G-HADR 2000S are the Receiver/Exciter (Rx/Ex), the Digitizer Chassis with VMA Cards, a Radar Signal Processor (RSP) for both the Main (SUM) and the Sidelobe Blanker (SLB) channels, and a Radar Data Processor (RDP). The G- HADR 2000S also incorporates a Maintenance and Control Function (MCF) and Radar Evaluation Tool (RET). The MCF provides the necessary controls to operate the HADR-2000S and provide a tactical Air Situational Display (ASD). The RET provides an offline capability to assess the performance of the radar. The following block diagrams provide an overview of the system configurations of the G- HADR 2000S in combination with IFF interrogator MSSR 2000I DR (Figure 2) and the IFF interrogator Siemens 1990 with Beacon Video Processor (Figure 3).
Figure 2: G-HADR 2000S in combination with IFF interrogator MSSR 2000I
HADR 2000S Blockdiagram (Radar Site Brockzetel / Erbeskopf [Configuration HADR 2000S + MSSR 2000i])
to GPS Antenna Final Driver HADR 2000S [GHADR] Air Picture ASTERIX passive Listner Amplifier 2 Amplifier 2 S-Band Output [10dBm] [ASTERIX 34/48] Wave [FA 2] [DA 2] Door Sensor Panel [A1] Guide AC Power Panel [A2] Switch HADR 2000S RRH [WGS] Final Driver S-Band Output [10dBm] Amplifier 1 Amplifier 1 Printer [FA 1] [DA 1] L Receiver / Exciter [A4] o c a Main CH Reseiver S-Band HADR 2000S RRH l RF- DOSC PSW PSR Primary A RET Tool Detector Antenna DRCV PSW r Radar Evaluation Tool Board SLB CH Receiver S-Ban F A SYNC PSW e Database Tool a N RIB N Air Picture and HADR RF Detector Power Digitizer Assy [A8] e Control HADR 2000S RRH BZ / EK t RF Detector I/F S-Band KVM Assy [A14] [Corba] Beam Steering w MCF PC Unit (BSU) o [MCF App as BZ or EK] Final Amp.1 I/F Syntheziser [A15] [PSR Antenna] r Final Amp.2 I/F k KVM Switch [A18] [ Waveguide Switch I/F Air Picture and HADR HADR 2000S RRH BZ (second MCF) GPS-NTP-Server [A19] L A Control Beam Steering Unit I/F Ethernet Switch [A20] MCF PC N [Corba] [MCF App as RU] RF-Protector ] Encoder Power Encoder PSW * only BZ ACP/NRP Power Supply’s [A23] ACP NRP Antenna Junction Box Distribution Air Picture and HADR Control Encoder Encoder I/F Output 14bit (not corrected) Box RSP A [SUM] [A25] [MCF Corba / ASTERIX 34/48] SINA Box Router
RSP B [SLB] [A27] 14bit corrected ACP/NRP SSR MSSR ASTERIX Plot and Command Message Secondary RDP [A29] Antenna 2000i for MSSR CH A and MSSR CH B Air Picture Air Picture and HADR Control [ASTERIX 34/48] [MCF Corba / ASTERIX 34/48] MilRadNet
SINA SINA SINA
HADR 2000S GeFüSys HADR 2000S GeFüSys Erndtebrück [LS] Erndtebrück Remote Remote HADR 2000S MCF-PC GIADS MCF-PC [SR] [MCF+RET] [MCF+RET] GIADS
Radarsite Marienbaum / Meßstetten CRC Erndtebrück [open] CRC Schönewalde [open] [Config SSR Siemens 1990]
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.5 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
Figure 3: G-HADR 2000S in combination with IFF interrogator Siemens 1990
HADR 2000S Blockdiagram (Radar Site Marienbaum / Meßstetten [Configuration HADR 2000S + BVP+ Siemens 1990-D14])
Final Driver HADR 2000S [GHADR] To GPS Antenna Air Picture ASTERIX passive Listner Amplifier 2 Amplifier 2 S-Band Output [10dBm] [ASTERIX 34/48] Wave [FA 2] [DA 2] Door Sensor Panel [A1] Guide AC Power Panel [A2] HADR 2000S RRH Switch [WGS] Final Driver S-Band Output [10dBm] Amplifier 1 Amplifier 1 Printer [FA 1] [DA 1] L Receiver / Exciter [A4] o c Main CH Reseiver S-Band a HADR 2000S RRH l RF- DOSC PSW RET Tool PSR Primary A Detector Radar Evaluation Tool Antenna DRCV PSW r Board SLB CH Receiver S-Ban F A SYNC PSW e Database Tool a N RIB N Air Picture and HADR Digitizer Assy [A8] RF Detector Power e Control HADR 2000S RRH MB / MS t RF Detector I/F S-Band KVM Assy [A14] [Corba] MCF PC Beam Steering w [MCF App as MB or MS] Unit (BSU) o Final Amp.1 I/F Syntheziser [A15] [PSR Antenna] r Final Amp.2 I/F k KVM Switch [A18] [ Waveguide Switch I/F Air Picture and HADR HADR 2000S RRH MS (second MCF) GPS-NTP-Server [A19] L Control A Beam Steering Unit I/F Ethernet Switch [A20] [Corba] MCF PC N [MCF App as SA] RF-Protector ] Encoder Power Encoder PSW * only MS ACP/NRP Power Supply’s [A23] ACP NRP Antenna Junction Box Distribution Air Picture and HADR Control Encoder Encoder I/F Output 14bit not corrected Box RSP A [SUM] [A25] [MCF Corba / ASTERIX 34/48] SINA Box Router
RSP B [SLB] [A27]
14bit corrected ACP/NRP Siemens 1990 Beacon Video RDP [A29] SSR Antenna D-14 Processor (BVP) BVP I/F Interrogator Air Picture Air Picture and HADR Control ASTERIX 34/48] [MCF Corba / ASTERIX 34/48] MilRadNet
SINA SINA SINA
HADR 2000S GeFüSys HADR 2000S GeFüSys Remote Erndtebrück [LS] Remote Erndtebrück MCF-PC GIADS MCF-PC [SR] HADR 2000S [MCF+RET] [MCF+RET] GIADS
Radarsite Brockzetel / Erbeskopf CRC Erndtebrück [open] CRC Schönewalde [open] [Configuration MSSR 2000i]
3.1. Receiver/Exciter (Rx/Ex) The G-HADR 2000S accepts the S-Band SUM and SLB channel inputs/outputs to the original Receiver/Exciter cabinet. During receive, the S-Band Radio Frequency (RF) is mixed down to 45 MHz Intermediate Frequency (IF) and supplied to the Digitizer Chassis. During transmission, the Rx/Ex up-converts the 45 MHz IF signal to the final RF, and sends the signal to the Traveling Wave Tube (TWT) and, if enabled, the Crossed-Field Amplifier (CFA).
3.2. Synthesizer The G-HADR 2000S uses a Commercial off the Shelf (COTS) frequency synthesizer with low phase noise to provide Stable Local Oscillator (STALO) signals to the Rx/Ex. This component is digitally controlled and receives commands from the Digitizer to select one of 122 channels within the HADR operating band. Additionally, the Synthesizer provides the 10 MHz Coherent Oscillator (COHO) to phase-lock the Local Oscillator within the Rx/Ex. 3.3. Digitizer Chassis In the Digitizer Chassis, the mixed down converted SUM and SLB signals are directly sampled with Analog to Digital Converters (ADC) driven at 60 MHz, digitally demodulated to baseband In-Phase and Quadrature (I & Q) signals at 6 Mega-Samples Per Second (MSPS). The I & Q signals are pulse compressed with a 4 MHz Linear Frequency Modulation (LFM) waveform and output to the Radar Signal Processor (RSP). The Digitizer provides all required
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.6 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh system synchronization triggers to the entire system, both the new and legacy hardware. All legacy system status signals are received by this unit. It also sends out all triggers and commands required by the system, such as Waveguide Switch Control, beam steering commands to the Beam Steering Unit (BSU) on the array, VSWR Signals from Waveguide System and Driver/Final Amplifier triggers. Upon transmission, the Digitizer generates the 4 MHz LFM waveform that is transmitted to the RE/EX. The Digitizer also provides control and status inputs for the existing Beacon Video Processor (BVP) and Siemens Identify Friend or Foe (IFF) subsystems. 3.4. Radar Signal Processor (RSP) There is a RSP for each the SUM and SLB channels. The SUM and SLB RSPs receive the corresponding channel I & Q data streams and provide coherent processing, non-coherent integration, clutter map processing and target detection logic. Detected targets are then sent to the RDP for final processing: creation of plots and correlation/reinforcement with the Secondary Surveillance Radar (SSR). The current Software Version is V22. 3.5. Radar Data Processor (RDP) The RDP performs the target position calculation and jam strobe tracking. The RDP receives inputs from the SSR (MSSR 2000I or Siemens 1990) and uses them for correlation/reinforcement. The resulting plot information, combined Primary Surveillance Radar (PSR)/SSR, SSR only or PSR only, is sent to the MCF for display. RDP also monitors the clutter processing in RSP for optimized template scheduling for the current environment. RDP handles frequency agility functions and provides the central location for Performance Monitoring and Fault Logic (PMFL). The Elevation Scan (ElScan) template calculations are completed in the RDP and beam steering information is sent to the Beam Steering Unit (BSU) located on the array through the Digitizer. The current Software Version is V22. 3.6. Maintenance Control Function (MCF) The MCF is a highly interactive Human-Machine Interface (HMI) from which all parameters of the G-HADR 2000S subsystem, including parts of the MSSR 2000I (ROSA Baseline 1.99) or the original HAC Beacon Video Processor with the Siemens 1990 D14, can be locally or remotely controlled. The current software version of the MCF is the V.21. 3.7. Radar Evaluation Tool (RET) The G-HADR 2000S includes a PC/Windows®-based Radar Evaluation Tool (RET) to provide the ability to analyse radar performance, verify radar specifications, and demonstrate radar capability to users. The current software version of the RET is the V.10. 3.8. Database Tool The Database Tool was part of the scope of delivery of the G-HADR 2000S system. With this software tool, which uses the MATLAB® environment, adjustments to beam templates as well as other system parameters such as range varying thresholds can be made. The current software version of the Database Tool is the V.12. 3.9. Software Maintenance Facility (SMF) During the first HADR upgrade from 2008 to 2010, the GAF System Centre was equipped with a SMF to provide software support for the radar sites. The current SMF consists of the following components:
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.7 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
Hardware: 1x MCF-Workstation with Display 27" 1x RET-PC with Display 19" 1x SVN-Server with Display 19" 1x Build-Server with Display 19" 1x Offline Maintenance Tool (Laptop 14") 1x external HDD 500GB 1x Ethernet Switch (24 Port) and needed cabling Software: OS Windows 7 - MCF / RET incl. MATLAB License and Database Tool - Visual Studio (Development Environment) OS Fedora Linux - SVN (Versioning Software) - Build-Tools 3.10. Training Facility (TF) During the first HADR upgrade from 2008 to 2010, the Air Force Engineering Training Centre was equipped with a TF to be enabled to train technical HADR site personnel. One MCF/RET workstation is used as a trainer workstation. The four other workstations are foreseen as trainee workstations. The training facility consists of: Hardware: 5x MCF/RET workstations (computer, display 27”) 1x Ethernet switch (24 port) and needed cabling Software: 5x MCF SW 5x RET SW (incl. MATLAB License and Database Tool)
4. OVERVIEW OF PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND CONTRACTOR’s TASKS Through this project, the Contractor shall replace or update the identified obsolete equipment and update the affected software and firmware preparing 4 upgrade Kits, one for each radar Site. This SoW has been prepared in order for the Contractor to undertake the following tasks: a. Establish the practical engineering design that will ensure that all current system performances are still met after the upgrade, including existing system & operational control capabilities (Local & Remote);
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.8 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
b. Develop the new equipment Human Machine Interface and output interfaces based on MCF SW Version V21; c. From a Work Breakdown perspective, due to the estimated duration of the project, the solution shall be developed, tested, implemented and validated. d. Upon contract award the Contractor shall perform the design and development activities leading to Critical Design Review (CDR). e. Following CDR approval by the NSPA, the Contractor shall conduct a Dry Run Testing followed by Factory Acceptance Testing for the solution proposed on the first of the 4 Kits. f. Dry Run Testing followed by Production Acceptance Testing shall be conducted for the other 3 Kits. g. The last milestone of the project is Final Acceptance (FA) and will be achieved once all equipment is successfully tested and all the deliverables are delivered to the end user. h. The Contractor shall, also, provide the logistics support deliverables included in the project, i.e. documentation, configuration data.
5. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS (R.T1) The Contractor shall provide the services, equipment, and facilities necessary to produce, integrate, test in factory, to the extent defined herein, the G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh, which shall be delivered ready to be installed on the 4 Radar sites. (R.T2) The Contractor shall make maximum use of existing designs, documentation, and processes in the execution of this effort to the extent such use is economically beneficial. (R.T3) The G-HADR-2000S Technical Refresh shall utilize commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components and assemblies to the maximum possible extent. (R.T4) All the equipment delivered and installed as part of this contract shall be new, not refurbished. (R.T5) The Contractor shall replace or upgrade the following Hardware: 1. The obsolete DRCV Printed Circuit Board (PCB). 2. The obsolete Synchronizer (SYNC) and Radar Interface Board (RIB) PCBs with form- fit-function equivalents. 3. The obsolete, low-profile, front-panel RF cable connectors with the standard profile variant. 4. The serial Front Panel Data Port (FPDP) over fibre between the DRCV and the RSPIO with a generic Ethernet over fibre (using UDP) between the DRCV and RSP. 5. The cabling between the parts that introduce different physical connections. 6. The RDP and RSP servers with new Hardware allowing both the RDP and the RSP to run on the same server, while maintaining functionality and performance. 7. All current MCF, MCF/RET, RET, SMF, TF Personal Computers (PC) with one type of new high performance desktop PCs running on Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019 with German/Germany keyboard layout. The contractor shall incorporate the functionalities of the current 2 different type of workstations (MCF and RET) into one new single MCF/RET workstation.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.9 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
8. All MCF, MCF/RET, RET, SMF, TF displays with one type of 27” displays (Resolution at least 1920x1200). 9. The current KVMs with KVMs capable of USB connections with German/Germany layout. 10. The current Ethernet Switches with one type of new Ethernet Switches (incl. necessary number of Media converters) for the SMF, TF and Radar Heads. 11. The current Offline Maintenance Tool (Laptop 14’’) with a new Laptop 14” (display resolution has to be suitable to run MCF). 12. The external Hard Disk Drive of the SMF with a new Hard Disk Drive (min 5 TB) (R.T6) A new Laptop 20’’ shall be procured for the Deployable CRC to enable the DCRC personnel to have the comprehensive MCF and RET functionality. The screen resolution shall be at least 1920 x 1200 and the performance equivalent with the MCF/RET PCs. (R.T7) The functionalities of the current SVN-Server and Build-Server shall be supported by one server with the same type of hardware as the new MCF/RET workstations equipped with a single display. (R.T8) The software of the RSP and RDP (RSDP), SVN and Build server of the SMF shall be updated to run on CentOS 8. (R.T9) The MCF and RET (incl. Database tool) functionalities shall be updated to run on Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC 2019. (R.T10) The Visual Studio, SVN versioning and Build Tools SW (incl. all third party products) shall be updated to the newest version available. (R.T11) All the PCs and Servers of the Technical Refresh shall use the Anti-Virus software Symantec Endpoint Protection. This Anti-Virus Software will be furnished by GAF as GFE and its procurement is out the scope of this SoW. (R.T12) The MATLAB version shall be updated to the latest official valid and usable MATLAB version (64 bit) in Germany. (R.T13) The COTS hardware and software to be supplied shall be of the latest production in the Contractor product line at the time of the order. The Contractor shall also provide any applicable software (on CD/DVD-ROM) and related User Licenses keys, registration and serial numbers associated to the COTS hardware to be supplied. (R.T14) The licenses of all Software products (incl. third party products) purchased with this SoW shall be able to be used without internet connection (offline) and be valid and allowed to be used in Germany. (R.T15) At time of delivery of the refreshed G-HADR 2000S equipment to GAF the contractor has to ensure that GAF is the licensee of all Software products delivered within the scope of this SoW. (R.T16) The licenses of all software products (incl. third party products) purchased within the scope of this SoW shall be timely unlimited. (R.T17) All the necessary firmware and software shall be introduced to the Technological Refresh Kit in order to support the control of the SSR Hardware (MSSR 2000I and Siemens 1990) and to process its data and status.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.10 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
(R.T18) The source code shall be able to be converted into executables via the SMF by the SMF user. (R.T19) The Source Code of the following software products shall be delivered in a digital CM certified version on an official data carrier (CD/DVD): - RSDP-SW - MCF-SW - RET-SW - Database Tool (R.T20) The functionalities of the latest known firmware versions of the existing G-HADR 2000S shall be incorporated in the G-HADR 2000S technical refresh. (R.T21) The Technical Refresh Kits (incl. Spare Parts) shall all have identical Hardware and have installed all the latest firmware versions developed within the scope of this project. (R.T22) The technical refresh of the Rx/Ex shall be completely independent of the technical refresh of the Digitizer + Servers. (R.T23) The current and the refreshed Rx/Ex shall function with both the current and the refreshed Digitizer + Servers. (R.T24) The Human Machine Interface (HMI) of the MCFs shall be updated to be consistent with the technological upgrade, while retaining all the functionalities of the current MCF HMI and keeping the changes as limited as possible. (R.T25) The refreshed G-HADR 2000S shall be controlled by both the current and the refreshed MCFs even while working in the same network configuration. The Air Situation Display and the status of the refreshed G-HADR 2000S shall be displayed on both the current and the refreshed MCFs while connected in the same network. (R.T26) The Technical Refresh shall incorporate all modifications and functionalities such as the adjustment of the RF timing, which was carried out in 2015 (Customer Logistic Support Contract: LE-EN24500253072). (R.T27) All the Hardware and Software of the Technical Refresh shall satisfy the requirements which are listed and group based upon system performance, external interfaces or functionalities, which are described in the System Performance Check (SPC) Acceptance Criteria (called: “Baseline Requirement” Doc. No.: 840-027965) of the G-HADR- 2000S upgrade. (R.T28) The Technical Refresh shall support both the MSSR 2000I and the IFF Siemens 1990 with Beacon Video Processor (BVP) configuration.
6. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION
6.1. System Design (D1) The Contractor shall develop the system design and any NDI adaptation required to adapt the equipment to the particularities of this project. In particular, the Contractor shall take into account the non-OEM technical documentation, specifically as it relates to
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.11 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh engineering changes from original system manufacturer configurations, which may be required for the Contractor to achieve the Final System Design. (R.D1.1) The Contractor shall present the System Design during the CDR.
6.2. Critical Design Review (CDR) (D2) The Contractor shall organize a CDR meeting to be attended by NSPA and End User representatives at his facility. In case of travel restrictions or difficulties the CDR meeting can take place in the form of a teleconference. (R.D2.1) The Contractor shall obtain from NSPA the authorization to call the CDR meeting, which shall be in principle granted. Since the starting point of the design is based in an existing and tested solution, NSPA doesn’t require the execution of a Preliminary Design Review. (R.D2.2) At CDR, the initial Product Baseline (PBL) shall be established and the Contractor shall provide evidence that the stable design meets the requirements in this SoW. In particular, the Contractor shall: a. Review in detail in conjunction with NSPA and End User representatives the initial HW and SW PBL to meet the requirements in Section 5. b. Provide evidence that the design meets the requirements in Section 5. c. Brief on production planning and risks related to production of the prototype or production units. d. Present the Verification and Acceptance Test Plan. e. Present relevant elements of logistics support related with the requirements of this contract. f. Review the status of technical risks. g. Review the Master Schedule. (D3) The Contractor shall submit the information package for review at CDR at least 4 weeks ahead of the meeting. (D4) Within 1 week of the completion of CDR the Contractor shall prepare and deliver the CDR meeting record, including any issues, agreed actions and closure plans and shall submit it for acceptance to NSPA.
6.3. Verification and Acceptance Test (V&A-T) Plan (D5) Not later than 8 weeks prior to the commencement of the Factory Acceptance Test the Contractor shall deliver the final Verification and Acceptance Test (V&A-T) Plan to NSPA for approval. Within 2 weeks of reception of the V&A-T Plan, NSPA will approve the Plan or provide motivated requirements for change or clarification. The Contractor shall either (a) accept and implement NSPA change requirements, (b) provide a mutually agreed alternative or (c) provide full justification that the challenged aspects of the V&A-T Plan are in conflict with the proposed NDI solution and not in conflict with requirement R.D2.1 and R.D2.2 below. (R.D5.1) The V&A Tests shall have as ultimate objective to demonstrate that the technical requirements in Section 5 have been achieved.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.12 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
(R.D5.2) The V&A-T Plan shall cover as a minimum the following activities: Dry Run Test: To be conducted by the Contractor following the production of each Kit. A passed Dry Run Test shall indicate the readiness to proceed to the FAT and PATs. Factory Acceptance Test (FAT): To be conducted by the Contractor following the successful Dry Run Test of the First Site Kit. The Contractor shall conduct FAT in the presence of NSPA and End User representatives. Production Acceptance Test (PAT): To be conducted by the Contractor following the successful Dry Run Test of the remaining 3 kits. (R.D5.3) The V&A-T Plan shall include for all testing and verification activities at least the following: List of proposed sub-tests and requirements verified; Detailed description of the test procedures for each sub-test; Test equipment or any requirement for NSPA or Host Nation furnished property, information, or manpower support; Pass/fail criteria and tolerances, where applicable; Reference standards (NATO, EUROCONTROL). (R.D5.4) The Contractor shall use appropriate test environment (Test Fixture, DRES, etc.) where the current and refreshed G-HADR 2000S components can be controlled by both the current and the refreshed MCF. (R.D5.5) The Contractor shall include in the FAT tests that will verify that the requirements of the baseline requirement document (Doc No.: 840-027965) affected by the technical refresh continue to be met. (R.D5.6) The PAT tests shall be a subset of the FAT tests. (R.D5.7) The Dry Run Tests shall include the same tests as the FAT and the PATs. (R.D5.8) During FAT the contractor shall demonstrate that the source code to be delivered within the scope of this SoW can be converted into executables via the SMF.
6.4. Production of the G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh Kits (D6) The Contractor shall manufacture all the new equipment needed as per the Master Schedule. (R.D6.1) The Contractor shall be responsible for the procurement of all material required for production of the G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh Kits with the exception of the material listed in the Table 2 below will be provided as GFE and which will be provided by NSPA to the contractor no later than 3 months after contract award. The material listed in Table 2 below is already under procurement by NSPA under NSPA PO.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.13 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
Table 2. Government Furnished Equipment per Kit
P/N Description Qty. 170-502953-G001 RECEIVER/EXCITER 1 190-502749-G001 RDP-RSP ASSEMBLY 1 170-018288-P001 DIGITIZER CHASSIS 1 130-502626-G002 DRCV PWA 1 130-018290-G001 DOSC PWA 1 130-018292-G012 DIGIB-RIB PWA 1 130-018292-G022 DIGIB-SYNC PWA 1 150-504076-P003 SMA-to-SMP CABLE 3
(R.D6.2) The Contractor shall ensure that all HW/Firmware and SW configuration of all G- HADR 2000S components and at all the purchased parts are identical.
6.5. Dry Run Test (D7) Upon completion of the production, the Contractor shall perform Dry Run Test on each Kit and within 15 days of the completion of the Dry Run Tests shall submit to NSPA the respective Dry Run Test Report. The Dry Run Test Report shall be sent 30 days before each FAT and PAT. NSPA will review the Report and decide regarding the readiness to perform the FAT and PATs. (R.D7.1) The Dry Run Test shall be conducted by the Contractor, and the Contractor’s Quality Assurance organization will observe the testing on behalf of Customer. (R.D7.2) The Dry Run Test Report shall contain the following information: P/N and S/N of the kits tested; P/N of the sub-assemblies tested; FW and SW versions installed; List of performed system sub-tests; Recorded test results with a note “Passed” or “Failed” IAW the V&A-T Plan, where applicable; Recommended course(s) of action with respect to each of the failed sub-tests; Overall Pass/Fail conclusion. A conclusion of “Pass” shall entail the Contractor’s assessment that the design is mature for implementation in operational systems; Any other, as appropriate (data recording and analysis files, printouts, pictures, records).
6.6. Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) (D8) Upon completion of the successful Dry Run Test, the Contractor shall perform FAT on the First Site Kit and within 20 days of the completion of FAT shall submit to NSPA the respective Certificate of Completion and Factory Acceptance Test Report. Within 14
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.14 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh calendar days, the Certificate and the Report will be reviewed and comments will be provided. (R.D8.1) The Contractor shall provide NSPA with 60 days’ notice of the scheduled FAT date. NSPA and End User shall have the option to nominate staff to witness the tests. If NSPA and End User decide not to provide a witness, the FAT shall be conducted by the Contractor as scheduled, and the Contractor’s Quality Assurance organization will observe the testing on behalf of Customer. (R.D8.2) The FAT Report shall contain the following information: P/N and S/N of the kits tested; P/N of the sub-assemblies tested; FW and SW versions installed; List of performed system sub-tests; Recorded test results with a note “Passed” or “Failed” IAW the V&A-T Plan, where applicable; Recommended course(s) of action with respect to each of the failed sub-tests; Overall Pass/Fail conclusion. A conclusion of “Pass” shall entail the Contractor’s assessment that the design is mature for implementation in operational systems; Any other, as appropriate (data recording and analysis files, printouts, pictures, records).
6.7. Production Acceptance Test (PAT) (D9) For each of the Kits 2 to 4, the contractor shall conduct a PAT and within 5 days of the completion of each PAT submit to NSPA the respective Certificate of Completion and Production Acceptance Test Report. Within 14 days, the Certificate of Completion and the Report will be reviewed and comments will be provided. (R.D9.1) The PAT Report shall contain the following information: P/N and S/N of the kits tested; P/N of the sub-assemblies tested; FW and SW versions installed; List of performed system sub-tests; Recorded test results with a note “Passed” or “Failed” IAW the V&A-T Plan, where applicable; Recommended course(s) of action with respect to each of the failed sub-tests; Overall Pass/Fail conclusion. A conclusion of “Pass” shall entail the Contractor’s assessment that the design is mature for implementation in operational systems; Any other, as appropriate (data recording and analysis files, printouts, pictures, records). (R.D9.2) NSPA and End User have the right to witness all 3 PATs and will inform the Contractor if they will do so during the FAT.
6.8. Delivery (D10) Upon accomplishment of the FAT and PATs, the Contractor shall be responsible for the packaging, transportation and delivery to sites in accordance with the Master Schedule.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.15 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
(R.D10.1) The contractor shall organize the export licences for all deliverables within the scope of this SoW. (R.D10.2) The contractor shall ensure that all the hardware is delivered accompanied by a Certificate of Conformity (CoC) and having a CE marking.
6.9. Logistic Support Deliverables 6.9.1 Documentation (D11) The contractor shall analyse the TME included in section 2 that are affected by this upgrade. (D12) Technical Manual (O&M Manual, MCF Manual, Drawings) Updates that incorporate the G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh kits into the standard G-HADR 2000S current manuals shall be supplied by the Contractor 30 days after the completion of the FAT. (R.D12.1) NSPA will conduct documentation validation activities upon receipt of documentation deliverables, and will notify the Contractor of any discrepancies identified. The Contractor shall rectify all recognized documentation discrepancies in order to achieve Final Acceptance. (R.D12.2) For COTS equipment, existing operation and maintenance manuals presented in the manufacturer's format shall be supplied. Appropriate references to these OEM manuals will be made, as required, in the applicable system Technical Manuals. (R.D12.3) All manuals shall be written in English and German language. (D13) Within 30 days from the delivery of the First Kit, the Contractor shall deliver to NSPA the updates to the System Requirements Specification and System Interface Control Document (ICD) under the new configuration (D14) Not later than the delivery of the last Kit, the contractor shall deliver the updated Hardware Design Documents (HDD) and Software Design Documents (SDD) of the LRUs which are affected by this technical refresh. (R.D14.1) Alongside the HDDs and SDDs the contractor shall deliver a list of the changes in the cabling. The list shall include the newly added cables and the ones that were removed or stopped being used. The cable list shall include a description, wiring number, the part number and the respective quantity. (D15) Together with the delivery of the equipment, the Contractor shall deliver the installation software of RSDP, MCF, RET, Database Tool and all third party products (e.g. MATLAB, WINDOWS 10 etc.) on CD/DVD.
6.9.2 Configuration (D16) Not later than the delivery of the last Kit, the Contractor shall provide the configuration identification data in the form of a hierarchical tree representation of the Kits up to component level listing: 1. NSN; 2. P/N 3. S/N; 4. main subassembly P/N;
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.16 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
5. LRU P/N. (R.D16.1) All drawings, BOM and Family Tree shall be updated in order to include the new assemblies and cabling. (R.D16.2) Each cable shall be marked with a unique wiring number which will be used as cable identification and will differentiate the new cables from the obsolete ones. (R.D16.3) The contractor shall initiate the codification of all new components, which will be introduced in the frame of this technical refresh, at its national codification agency.
6.9.3 Spare parts (D17) 4 spare sets of cables related to the Technical Refresh shall be delivered in the scope of this SoW. These cables are described in (RT.5) and (R.D14.1).
7 ACCEPTANCE MILESTONES There shall be 2 major acceptance milestones: Factory Acceptance, and Final Acceptance (FA).
7.1. Factory Acceptance The Factory Acceptance is the act whereby NSPA will formally acknowledge that the technical requirements for the first G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh Kit have been achieved in factory conditions and it is ready for field installation. It will be performed by the Contractor in its premises and related FAT Report and Certificates of Completion shall be provided to NSPA.
7.2. Final Acceptance (FA) FA is the act whereby NSPA will definitively accept all delivered products and services in this SoW for each site as complying with the contractual requirements. Once all conditions for FA have been achieved, NSPA will issue a notification to the Contractor with the confirmation of FA.
8. QUALITY ASSURANCE (R.Q1) The Contractor shall conduct quality management activities in this project in accordance with an internationally recognized standard for quality management systems (e.g. AQAP 2110, ISO 9001, AS9100).
9. HEALTH AND SAFETY (R.2) The Contractor is the sole responsible for the safety of the personnel and equipment during all the phases from production to delivery of the services and materials requested under this SoW. The Contractor shall develop, maintain and implement their own Health and Safety Environment (HSE) program. The Contractor shall comply with the applicable regulations, standards, policies and recognized safe work practices, as well as waste management and spill prevention practices.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.17 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
The Contractor shall provide adequate and correct personnel protective equipment and ensure their people are trained in its use and that is used properly. (R.3) The Contractor shall ensure that all hazardous substances which are used in components are properly indicated in a Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) and specific instructions are provided if needed, so the health of the personnel is not compromised. If items to be supplied under the scope of this SOW consist of Lithium batteries, the Contractor shall provide test report for batteries iaw UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Revision and amend. 1, Part III, sub-section 38.3 requirements.
10. PROJECT MANAGEMENT This project will be subject to review by NSPA at any time. NSPA will assign a Project Manager who will manage and monitor the project on a day-to-day basis, using the controls defined in paragraph 10.2. (D18) The Contractor shall nominate a Project Manager who will be the main POC for this project.
10.1. Master Schedule (D19) Not later than 5 weeks after Contract Award, the Contractor shall deliver a Master Schedule for the delivery of all products and services in this contract. Within 2 weeks of reception, NSPA will approve the Master Schedule or provide requirements for change or clarification. The Contractor shall implement the changes required by NSPA for final agreement. (R.D19.1) The Master Schedule shall indicate the planned dates for all events and intermediate milestones described in this SoW in order to achieve the Final Acceptance not later than 12 months after Contract Award. (R.D19.2) In case of project changes, the Contractor shall update the Master Schedule accordingly and submit for NSPA approval. (R.D19.3) At any point during the execution of the Contract, where the Contractor foresees any significant risk to the schedule or circumstance creating a risk to any of the requirements in this document, he/she shall inform NSPA immediately in writing and will seek agreement in the way ahead. (D20) There shall be the following Project Management Review / Technical Interchange Meeting (PMR/TIM) during the execution of the contract: PMR/TIM - upon completion of the design phase, which will cover at least the following: - Design and Requirements Review; - Master schedule; - V&AT Plan - Preliminary elements (test strategy, key attributes to be tested etc.); - Risk Review; - Documentation deliverables - preliminary elements on scope of documentation to be delivered.
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.18 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
Additionally, if at any point during the execution of this contract, NSPA or the Contractor deems necessary an extraordinary review, this shall be called by the requesting party. If the meeting is called by NSPA, any cost incurred by the Contractor shall be considered as a modification to this contract. (R.D20.1) The Contractor shall record the minutes of all formal meetings. Meeting minutes shall be provided to NSPA for approval.
10.2. Controls (D21) The Contractor shall maintain a Risk Log identifying, as a minimum, the cause, probability and impact (in scope, schedule and cost) of each risk. Risk reviews shall be part of PRM/TIM meetings. (R.D21.1) Together with each risk the Contractor shall identify in the risk log a mitigation action. (R.D21.2) The Contractor shall update the Risk Log as soon as any of the identified characteristics changes or as soon as a new risk is identified. (D22) The Contractor shall submit a Project Exception Report (ER), Engineering Change Proposal (ECP), Request for Deviation (RFD), Request for Waiver (RFW) for any deviations from the SoW, providing the adequate correction action, when applicable. (R.D22.1) The ER shall include, as a minimum, known causes for the deviation and impact, as well as a plan to deal with the exception identified, for NSPA approval. (D23) The Contractor shall attend PMR/TIM with NSPA and End User, the first PMR/TIM shall be held at the same time as the CDR. Further PMR/TIM 2 shall be scheduled if needed. (R.D23.1) The PMR/TIMs will be co-chaired by the Contractor and NSPA. The Contractor shall ensure that the Contractor Project Manager and support staff shall attend. (R.D23.2) The Contractor shall deliver a final copy of the minutes to NSPA within 1 week of receipt of the NSPA’s comments. The Contractor shall not consider the minutes as the basis for changes to the terms and conditions or SoW of the Contract in the Absence of a formal Contract Amendment. (D24) The Contractor shall prepare and submit a Project Highlight Report (HR) to NSPA, as a general rule, unless directed otherwise by NSPA, 1 month before each PMR/TIMs. (R.D24.1) The HR shall summarize the status and progress of each of the Services and Deliverables since last PMR and it shall include, as a minimum: a. Period covered b. Schedule status summary, c. Risk and Issues update and associated impact d. Eventual ECPs, RFD, RFW to be tabled at next PMR e. Agenda for the next PMR
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.19 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.20 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
ANNEX 1: SUMMARY OF DELIVERABLE DATA, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES
The Table below lists the deliverable products and services under this SoW. It is provided as a quick reference for convenience.
In case of any inconsistency between this table and the Text in the SoW document body, the text in the document body shall prevail.
Table 3. Deliverables
Serial Deliverable Type Requirements When D1 System Design Data (Documents) R.D1.1 During the CDR D2 CDR Service R.D2.1, R.D2.2 As Per Master schedule D3 CDR Information Package Data (Documents Best Practice 4 weeks before CDR D4 CDR meeting record Services Best Practice 1 week after CDR (Documents) D5 Verification & Data (Documents) R.D5.1 to R.D5.8 8 weeks prior FAT Acceptance Test Plan D6 Manufacturing Services R.D6.1, R.D6.2 As per Master Schedule D7 Dry Run Test Services R.D7.1, R.D7.2 After production; (Documents) Documents – 10 days of completion D8 FAT Services R.D8.1, R.D8.2 As per Master Schedule; (Documents) Notice – 60 days; Documents – 20 days of completion D9 PAT Services R.D9.1, R.D9.2 As per Master Schedule; (Documents) Documents – 5 days of completion D10 Packing, shipping and Services R.D10.1, R.D10.2 As per Master Schedule delivery D11 TME Analysis Services Best Practice 1 Month before PMR/TIM D12 Technical Manual Data (Documents) R.D12.1, R.D12.2, 30 days after FAT Updates R.D12.3 D13 Updates to the System Data (Documents) Best Practice 30 days after delivery of first Specification and ICD kit D14 Updates to the HDDs and Data (Documents) R.D14.1 Delivery of last kit SDDs D15 Software delivery Data Best Practice Together with the delivery of equipment D16 Configuration Data (Documents) R.D16.1, R.D16.2, Delivery of last kit Identification Data R.D16.3 D17 Spare parts Material Best Practice Together with the delivery of equipment D18 Nominate a Project Service Best Practice Contract Award Manager D19 Master Schedule Data (Documents) R.D19.1, R.D19.2, 5 weeks after Contract R.D19.3 Award D20 PMR/TIMs Services R.D20.1 At CDR, when required
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.21 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
(Documents) D21 Risk Log Services R.D21.1, R.D21.2 When required (Documents) D22 Exception Report (ER), Services R.D22.1 When required Engineering Change (Documents) Proposal (ECP), Request for Deviation (RFD), Request for Waiver (RFW) D23 Attend PMR/TIMs Services R.D23.1, R.D23.2 When required (Documents) D24 Project highlight Report Services R.D24.1 1 month before PMR/TIM (Documents)
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.22 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
ANNEX 2: ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AQAP Allied Quality Assurance Publication AWCIES ACCS-Wide Communication Information Exchange Standard BAAINBw Bundesamt fuer Ausruestung, Informationstechnik und Nutzung der Bundeswehr (Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In Service Support BSU Beam Steering Unit BVP Beacon Video Processor
COTS Commercial Off-The-Shelf CRC Control and Reporting Centre DCRC Deployable Control and Reporting Centre DRES Dynamic Radar Environment Simulator CE Conformité Européenne CoC Certificate of Conformity DP Data Processor ElScan Elevation Scan EUROCONTROL European Organization for the Safety of Air Navigation FA Final Acceptance FAT Factory Acceptance Test FW Firmware FT Factory Test GAF German Air Force GFE Government Furnished Equipment HADR Hughes Air Defense Radar HDD Hardware Design Documents HL Hardware Level (maintenance) HMI Human Machine Interface HR Highlight Report HW Hardware HSE Health and Safety Environment IAW In Accordance With ICD Interface Control Document I&CO (or INCO) Installation and Check-Out IFF Identification Friend or Foe ITU International Telecommunications Union KVM Keyboard Video Mouse LRU Line Replaceable Unit MCF Maintenance Control Function MFI Monitoring and Fault Isolation MSSR Mono pulse Secondary Surveillance Radar MTBCF Mean Time Between Critical Failures NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.23 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
NDI Non Developmental Item NLT Not Later Than NSPA NATO Support and Procurement Agency ODAS Offline Detection Analysis Software O&M Operation and Maintenance OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer PDF Portable Document Format PMFL Performance Monitoring and Fault Isolation PMR/TIM Program Management Review / Technical Interchange Meeting PAT Production Acceptance Test P/N Part Number PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency PSR Primary Surveillance Radar RADNET Radar Network RET Radar Evaluation Tool R-SPC Radar – System Performance Check SDD Software Design Documents SIB System Interface Board SGS Scenario Generator Software SMF Software Maintenance Facility S/N Serial Number POC Point of Contact SoW Statement of Work SPT&A System Performance Test and Alignment STC Sensitivity Time Control SSR Secondary Surveillance Radar STANAG Standardization Agreement SW Software SYNC Synchronizer TF Training Facility TIM Technical Interchange Meeting TME Technical Manual Equipment TMs Technical Manuals V&A-T Verification and Acceptance Test (Plan) UDP/IP User Datagram Protocol/Internet Protocol UPS Uninterruptible Power Supply
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.24 NATO UNCLASSIFIED German G-HADR 2000S Technical Refresh
ANNEX 3: SUMMARY OF THE HARDWARE TO BE PROCURED UNDER THIS SoW
Following is a summary of the hardware to be procured within the scope of this SoW.
Table 4. Hardware to be procured under this SoW
Description Quantity MCF/RET workstation incl. 27” display 15 KVM switch 6 Hardware for SMF as per Section 3.9, (R.T5) and (R.T7) 1 Hardware for TF as per Section 3.9 and (R.T5) 1 MCF/RET 20“ Laptop 1 Ethernet Switch (incl. necessary number of Media converters) 6 Supplement Cable Kits (incl. spares) 8
NATO UNCLASSIFIED p.25