DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Do Gnostics Consider Mary Magdalene the Greatest Apostle?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Do Gnostics Consider Mary Magdalene the Greatest Apostle? Why Do Gnostics Consider Mary Magdalene the Greatest Apostle? BY MIGUEL CONNER · JULY 15, 2015 Mainstream Christianity has many views of Mary Magdalene. She is a penitent sinner, a redeemed prostitute, the first witness to the Resurrection, the messenger to the Apostles, and a source of erotic inspiration for artists throughout history. Mary Magdalene is a complex, misunderstood, and marginalized figure in Orthodoxy, a symbol for the plight of females within the Christian religion. But in Gnosticism her role is clearly defined—Mary Magdalene is not only the main Apostle to the living Christ but a Gnostic leader for the ages. This declaration is perhaps ironic since Gnostics have a tendency to continually re- interpret and re-evaluate Biblical characters to suit their spiritual explorations. But there’s something about Mary. One of the most thorough expositions on the Gnostic Mary Magdalene comes from Jane Schaberg’s The Resurrection of Mary Magdalene. Schaberg lists nine characteristics that define the consort of Jesus Christ, as she is known in Gnostic and Apocryphal texts: 1) Mary is Prominent. The Magdalene is a main protagonist whenever she appears. In The Dialogue of the Savior, Mary is considered a “sister,” an equal to those entrusted with spreading the light of Gnosis. In The Gospel of Philip, she is one who “always walks with the Lord,” a privilege only enjoyed by Enoch and Noah in the entire Bible. Mary replaces the two Patriarchs of the Old Testament as a favorite of the Divine in the new dispensation. In The Pistis Sophia, Mary is the most outstanding student of Jesus, the chief questionnaire who gives the most insightful answers. 2) Mary Thrives in a World of Androcentric Language and Patriarchal Rules. A perfect example is found in The Gospel of Thomas, Saying #114: “Simon Peter said to them, “Make Mary leave us, for females don’t deserve life.” Jesus said, “Look, I will guide her to make her male, so that she too may become a living spirit resembling you males. For every female who makes herself male will enter the kingdom of Heaven.” This may appear like a misogynistic interaction between Jesus and Simon Peter. Yet the passage is a classic belief that an enlightened individual comprises both male and female aspects. This is evident because the word used for male in Greek is anthropos, which has the context of a complete, fulfilled human being. Mary Magdalene will be given the godly form of Plato’s Hermaphrodite or the image of God in Genesis that man enjoyed before being split into genders. In The Acts of Philip, Mary outwits her oppressive culture by dressing up as a man in order to teach and baptize the faithful. This scripture places Mary as the actual sister of the Apostle Philip (another favorite hero of the Gnostics); and in the end her courage and faith are stronger than her sibling’s. 3) Mary is Bold in Her Speech. Schaberg writes that Mary has been given a voice that is “powerful, insistent, and courageous (p. 141).” In Gnostic narratives, she is almost always confident in dialogue, speech, or teaching. Mary’s conviction is never in doubt. In The Pistis Sophia, Jesus tells her, “speak open and do not fear.” For her insights and wisdom, Jesus tells her, “Mary, thou blessed one, who I will complete in all the mysteries.” In The Dialogue with The Savior, Mary comes out and tells Jesus, “I want to understand all things, just as they are!” In The Didascalia Apostolorum, Mary laughs during the Last Supper. When she is scolded by the Apostle John, she shoots back: I did not really laugh, only I remembered the words of our Lord and I exulted; for ye know that he told us before, when he was teaching: the weak shall be saved through the strong. 4) Mary is seen as a leader. Jesus often grants her authority and often Mary takes authority onto herself. In The Sophia of Jesus Christ, the Savior tells all the disciples, including Mary, that “I have given you authority over all things as Sons of Light.” In The First Apocalypse of James, Mary is one of the four women that serves “as a model for how James is supposed to go about his own mission.” The text further says that Mary has “become strong by a perception that which is in them (the other female disciples).” In The Pistis Sophia, Jesus says: “But Mary Magdalene and John the virgin will surpass all my disciples and all men who shall receive mysteries in the Ineffable, they will be on my right hand and on my left.” 5) Mary is a Visionary. She possesses the powers of prophecy and sight into the astral worlds. In The Gospel of Mary, after comforting the Apostles because of the departure of Christ, she tells them, “What is hidden from you I will proclaim to you.” In The Great Question of Mary, Jesus allows her to see an erotic but very symbolical vision that reveals she is the new, improved Eve. In The Pistis Sophia, Mary both experiences and interprets mystical visions. 6) Mary is praised for her superior understanding. In The Dialogue with The Savior, Mary is described as “the woman who understood completely.” In several Gnostic accounts like The Pistis Sophia or The Manichaean Psalm Book, she is continuously praised by Jesus for her perception. In The Acts of Philip, her brother Philip tells her, “I know that you are good and courageous soul and blessed among women.” 7) Mary is Identified as the Intimate Companion of Jesus. The Gospel of Philip declares that Jesus “loved her more than the other disciples.” Although this passage has been used as evidence of a carnal relationship between Jesus and Mary, the Gnostic interpretation would see them as two twin beings that were spiritually actualized. Schaberg explains that Mary “is loved by the Savior because in contrast to the other disciples she is not blind, but sees the light (P. 150).” The Gospel of Philip also identifies her as the “companion” of The Lord, a title that is not used for any other character in Gnostic works. In The Gospel of Mary, Peter tells Mary that Jesus “loved you more than the rest of the women.” Schaberg states that, in essence, just as Mary has been proclaimed the restored Eve, Jesus is the restored Adam; and both share in a state of wholeness before the fall (P. 154). The Manichaean Psalm Book says that Mary “is the spirit of wisdom” and “chosen by the Son.” 8) Mary is Opposed by and in Open Conflict with One or More of the Disciples. This is an obvious symbolism between Gnosticism and Orthodoxy, as already revealed by the remarks of Peter in The Gospel of Thomas, saying #114 (quoted above). In Gnostic narratives, Peter often symbolizes Orthodox Christianity and intolerance in general. In The Acts of Philip, Peter is “the man who fled from all places where there is a woman.” In The Acts of Peter, the first Pope paralyzes his own daughter in order for her to remain a virgin. The Pistis Sophia has Peter opposing Mary three times. In one passage he says, “We are not able to suffer this woman who takes the opportunity from us.” Peter also adds, “My Lord, let the women cease to question, that we may also question.” Mary later tells Jesus, “I am afraid of Peter, for he threatens me and hates our race (the Gnostics).” Although Jesus mediates in most of these gospels, The Gospel of Mary contains a scene where Peter and his brother Andrew bully her for being a woman and the preferred of Christ. Schaberg explains that the Apostles dislike her because Mary is “the knower, the one who understands, the one who is sensual and wise, sensitive and emotional (P. 162).” 9) Mary is defended. The Gospel of Philip, The Gospel of Thomas and The Pistis Sophia have Jesus defending Mary Magdalene. In The Gospel of Mary, the Apostle Levi (representing moderate Christianity) stands up for her honor against Peter and Andrew. In The Manichaean Psalm Book, Jesus coaches his companion on how to modify her message when she is scorned. In The Epistula Apostorum, Jesus personally goes with Mary after his resurrection to scold Peter, who does not believe the Savior would have risen before a female first. Beyond all titles and attributes, the Gnostic gospels reveal Mary Magdalene as someone who truly cultivated Gnosis (divine knowledge/self-knowledge/knowledge of all realities). And above all titles and attributes, Mary and Jesus are not only the new Adam and Eve but the lower incarnations of the Cosmic Christ and Holy Sophia. They are joint heroes in the Gnostic epic, as well as the two pieces of the puzzle in finding spiritual liberation despite the fundamentalist forces around them. Mary Magdalene, in both the Bible and art, is certainly a captivating figure. But this Mary is simply a small fraction of a figure that is truly both a religious and inspirational cosmic force. There’s certainly something about Mary. And that is the pathway to Gnosis. http://thegodabovegod.com/why-do-gnostics-consider-mary-magdalene-the-greatest- apostle/ .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tradition of the Female Deacon in the Eastern Churches
    The Tradition of the Female Deacon in the Eastern Churches Valerie Karras, Th.D., Ph.D. and Caren Stayer, Ph.D. St. Phoebe Center Conference on “Women and Diaconal Ministry in the Orthodox Church: Past, Present, and Future” Union Theological Seminary, New York, NY December 6, 2014 PURPOSE OF HISTORY SESSION • To briefly review the scholarship on the history of the deaconess, both East and West • To lay the groundwork for discussions later in the day about the present and future • To familiarize everyone with material you can take with you • Book list; book sales • We ask you to share and discuss this historical material with others in your parish TIMELINE—REJUVENATION FROM PATRISTIC PERIOD (4TH -7TH C.) • Apostolic period (AD 60-80): Letters of Paul (Rom 16:1 re Phoebe) • Subapostolic period (late 1st/early 2nd c.): deutero-Pauline epistles (I Tim. 3), letter of Trajan to Pliny the Younger • Byzantine period (330-1453) − comparable to Early, High, and Late Middle Ages plus early Renaissance in Western Europe • Early church manuals (Didascalia Apostolorum, late 3rd/early 4th c.; Testamentum Domini, c.350; Apostolic Constitutions, c.370, Syriac) • 325-787: Seven Ecumenical Councils • Saints’ lives, church calendars, typika (monastic rules), homilies, grave inscriptions, letters • 988: conversion of Vladimir and the Rus’ • 12th c. or earlier: office of deaconess in Byz. church fell into disuse • Early modern period in America • 1768: first group of Greek Orthodox arrives in what is now Florida • 1794: first formal Russian Orthodox mission arrives in what is now Alaska BYZANTINE EMPIRE AND FIVE PATRIARCHATES CIRCA 565 A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW TESTAMENT APOCRYPHA and PSEUDEPIQRAPHA: a Guide to Publications, with Excursuses on Apocalypses by JAMES H
    THE NEW TESTAMENT APOCRYPHA AND PSEUDEPIQRAPHA: a guide to publications, with excursuses on apocalypses by JAMES H. CHARLESWORTH with James R. Mueller assisted by many, especially Amy-Jill Levine, Randall D. Chesnutt, and M. J. H. Charlesworth ATLA BIBLIOGRAPHY SERIES, MO. 17 The American Theological Library Association and The Scarecrow Press, Inc. Metuchen, N.J., and London • 1987 CONTENTS Editor's Foreword xiii Preface xv I. INTRODUCTION 1 A Report on Research 1 Description 6 Excluded Documents 6 1) Apostolic Fathers 6 2) The Nag Hammadi Codices 7 3) The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha 7 4) Early Syriac Writings 8 5) Earliest Versions of the New Testament 8 6) Fakes 9 7) Possible Candidates 10 Introductions 11 Purpose 12 Notes 13 II. THE APOCALYPSE OF JOHN—ITS THEOLOGY AND IMPACT ON SUBSEQUENT APOCALYPSES Introduction . 19 The Apocalypse and Its Theology . 19 1) Historical Methodology 19 2) Other Apocalypses 20 3) A Unity 24 4) Martyrdom 25 5) Assurance and Exhortation 27 6) The Way and Invitation 28 7) Transference and Redefinition -. 28 8) Summary 30 The Apocalypse and Its Impact on Subsequent Apocalypses 30 1) Problems 30 2) Criteria 31 3) Excluded Writings 32 4) Included Writings 32 5) Documents , 32 a) Jewish Apocalypses Significantly Expanded by Christians 32 b) Gnostic Apocalypses 33 c) Early Christian Apocryphal Apocalypses 34 d) Early Medieval Christian Apocryphal Apocalypses 36 6) Summary 39 Conclusion 39 1) Significance 39 2) The Continuum 40 3) The Influence 41 Notes 42 III. THE CONTINUUM OF JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN APOCALYPSES: TEXTS AND ENGLISH TRANSLATIONS Description of an Apocalypse 53 Excluded "Apocalypses" 54 A List of Apocalypses 55 1) Classical Jewish Apocalypses and Related Documents (c.
    [Show full text]
  • New Testament and the Lost Gospel
    New Testament And The Lost Gospel Heliometric Eldon rear her betrayal so formerly that Aylmer predestines very erectly. Erodent and tubular Fox expresses Andrewhile fusible nickers Norton pertly chiviedand harp her her disturbances corsair. rippingly and peace primarily. Lou often nabs wetly when self-condemning In and the real life and What route the 17 books of prophecy in the Bible? Hecksher, although he could participate have been ignorant on it if not had suchvirulent influence and championed a faith so subsequent to issue own. God, he had been besieged by students demanding to know what exactly the church had to hide. What was the Lost Books of the Bible Christianity. Gnostic and lost gospel of christianity in thismaterial world with whom paul raising the news is perhaps there. Will trump Really alive All My Needs? Here, are called the synoptic gospels. Hannah biblical figure Wikipedia. Church made this up and then died for it, and in later ages, responsible for burying the bodies of both after they were martyred and then martyred themselves in the reign of Nero. Who was busy last transcript sent by God? Judas gospel of gospels makes him in? Major Prophets Four Courts Press. Smith and new testament were found gospel. Digest version of jesus but is not be; these scriptures that is described this website does he is a gospel that? This page and been archived and about no longer updated. The whole Testament these four canonical gospels which are accepted as she only authentic ones by accident great. There has also acts or pebble with names of apostles appended to them below you until The Acts of Paul, their leash as independent sources of information is questionable, the third clue of Adam and Eve.
    [Show full text]
  • FATHERS Church
    FOC_TPages 9/12/07 9:47 AM Page 2 the athers Fof the Church A COMPREHENSIVE INTRODUCTION HUBERTUS R. DROBNER Translated by SIEGFRIED S. SCHATZMANN with bibliographies updated and expanded for the English edition by William Harmless, SJ, and Hubertus R. Drobner K Hubertus R. Drobner, The Fathers of the Church Baker Academic, a division of Baker Publishing Group, © 2007. Used by permission. _Drobner_FathersChurch_MiscPages.indd 1 11/10/15 1:30 PM The Fathers of the Church: A Comprehensive Introduction English translation © 2007 by Hendrickson Publishers Hendrickson Publishers, Inc. P. O. Box 3473 Peabody, Massachusetts 01961-3473 ISBN 978-1-56563-331-5 © 2007 by Baker Publishing Group The Fathers of the Church: A Comprehensive Introduction, by Hubertus R. Drobner, withPublished bibliographies by Baker Academic updated and expanded for the English edition by William Harmless,a division of SJ, Baker and Hubertus Publishing Drobner, Group is a translation by Siegfried S. Schatzmann ofP.O.Lehrbuch Box 6287, der Grand Patrologie. Rapids,© VerlagMI 49516-6287 Herder Freiburg im Breisgau, 1994. www.bakeracademic.com All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any Baker Academic paperback edition published 2016 formISBN or978-0-8010-9818-5 by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, record- ing, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writingPreviously from published the publisher. in 2007 by Hendrickson Publishers PrintedThe Fathers in the of Unitedthe Church: States A ofComprehensive America Introduction, by Hubertus R. Drobner, with bibliographies updated and expanded for the English edition by William Harmless, SecondSJ, and PrintingHubertus — Drobner, December is a 2008 translation by Siegfried S.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Gospel-Of-Mary.Pdf
    OXFORD EARLY CHRISTIAN GOSPEL TEXTS General Editors Christopher Tuckett Andrew Gregory This page intentionally left blank The Gospel of Mary CHRISTOPHER TUCKETT 1 3 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox26dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With oYces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York ß Christopher Tuckett, 2007 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) First published 2007 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Data available Typeset by SPI Publisher Services Ltd., Pondicherry, India Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Biddles Ltd., King’s Lynn, Norfolk ISBN 978–0–19–921213–2 13579108642 Series Preface Recent years have seen a signiWcant increase of interest in non- canonical gospel texts as part of the study of early Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Texts and Traditions
    Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament Herausgeber / Editor Jörg Frey (Zürich) Mitherausgeber / Associate Editors Markus Bockmuehl (Oxford) · James A. Kelhoffer (Uppsala) Hans-Josef Klauck (Chicago, IL) · Tobias Nicklas (Regensburg) J. Ross Wagner (Durham, NC) 349 Rediscovering the Apocryphal Continent: New Perspectives on Early Christian and Late Antique Apocryphal Texts and Traditions Edited by Pierluigi Piovanelli and Tony Burke With the collaboration of Timothy Pettipiece Mohr Siebeck Pierluigi Piovanelli, born 1961; 1987 MA; 1992 PhD; Professor of Second Temple Judaism and Early Christianity at the University of Ottawa (Ontario, Canada). Tony Burke, born 1968; 1995 MA; 2001 PhD; Associate Professor of Early Christianity at York University (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). ISBN 978-3-16-151994-9 / eISBN 978-3-16-157495-5 unveränderte eBook-Ausgabe 2019 ISSN 0512-1604 (Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum NeuenT estament) Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliographie; detailed bibliographic data is available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2015 by Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, Germany. www.mohr.de This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that permitted by copyright law) without the publisher’s written permission. This applies particularly to reproduc- tions, translations, microfilms and storage and processing in electronic systems. The book was typeset by Martin Fischer inT übingen using Minion Pro typeface, printed by Gulde-Druck in Tübingen on non-aging paper and bound by Buchbinderei Spinner in Otters- weier. Printed in Germany. This volume is dedicated to the memories of Pierre Geoltrain (1929–2004) and François Bovon (1938–2013), without whom nothing of this would have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apocryphal Gospels
    A NOW YOU KNOW MEDIA W R I T T E N GUID E The Apocryphal Gospels: Exploring the Lost Books of the Bible by Fr. Bertrand Buby, S.M., S.T.D. LEARN WHILE LISTENING ANYTIME. ANYWHERE. THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS: EXPLORING THE LOST BOOKS OF THE BIBLE WRITTEN G U I D E Now You Know Media Copyright Notice: This document is protected by copyright law. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. You are permitted to view, copy, print and distribute this document (up to seven copies), subject to your agreement that: Your use of the information is for informational, personal and noncommercial purposes only. You will not modify the documents or graphics. You will not copy or distribute graphics separate from their accompanying text and you will not quote materials out of their context. You agree that Now You Know Media may revoke this permission at any time and you shall immediately stop your activities related to this permission upon notice from Now You Know Media. WWW.NOWYOUKNOWMEDIA.COM / 1 - 800- 955- 3904 / © 2010 2 THE APOCRYPHAL GOSPELS: EXPLORING THE LOST BOOKS OF THE BIBLE WRITTEN G U I D E Table of Contents Topic 1: An Introduction to the Apocryphal Gospels ...................................................7 Topic 2: The Protogospel of James (Protoevangelium of Jacobi)...............................10 Topic 3: The Sayings Gospel of Didymus Judas Thomas...........................................13 Topic 4: Apocryphal Infancy Gospels of Pseudo-Thomas and Others .......................16 Topic 5: Jewish Christian Apocryphal Gospels ..........................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • The Gospel of Mary: Reclaiming Feminine Narratives Within Books Excluded from the Bible
    The Gospel of Mary: Reclaiming Feminine Narratives Within Books Excluded from the Bible By Therasa Topete Jayne Lewis, Ph.D. Department of English Joseph McKenna, Ph.D. Department of History A thesis submitted in partial completion of the certification requirements for the Honors Program of the School of Humanities University of California, Irvine May 26, 2017 ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank the individuals and groups that have supported me through the year-long process of producing this thesis. I would like to thank the director of the School of Humanities Honors Program Professor Jayne Lewis. I have greatly appreciated your support and enthusiasm for my project. I am so grateful that you never gave up on me and continued to draw out my passion for this labor of love, especially when I could not see a way past the wall at times. Thank you. Thank you to my faculty advisor Joseph Mckenna who stepped in without a second thought to help me through the end of this process. I appreciate that you are always willing to greet me with a smile and engage in some of the most interesting conversations I have had in my three years at UCI. You are the best. Thank you to my peers in the humanities Honors program. Your encouragement and positive attitudes have been a source of inspiration, and I have appreciated the opportunity to engage in amazing intellectual discussions twice a week for the last two years. You are all amazing. Lastly, I would like to say a big thank you to my family.
    [Show full text]
  • The Insignificance of Mary in the Gospel of Thomas 114 Anna Cwikla [email protected]
    There’s Nothing about Mary: The Insignificance of Mary in the Gospel of Thomas 114 Anna Cwikla [email protected] ABSTRACT Feminist approaches to early Christian texts have consistently evaluated female characters as the primary focus of analysis. Yet in doing so, placing the spotlight on the female figure inevitably pushes male figures, and by extension, the broader context to the margins. This type of analysis runs the risk of overemphasizing the role of a woman in a given text while neglecting their narrative function in relation to male characters. This article looks specifically at Mary in the Gospel of Thomas. Previously, Mary has been seen as equal to or even more important than other disciples in the text. But using Eve Sedgwick’s homosocial bond theory reveals that the Gospel of Thomas wishes to emphasize the relationship between Jesus and Peter more so than it does Mary. This example is but a case in point in seeing that although our focus as modern scholars shifts to the woman, the ancient text is more so concerned about the iteration of power structures between men over women. KEYWORDS Gospel of Thomas, Mary Magdalene, Eve Sedgwick, feminist criticism recurring stumbling block for feminist scholars of early Christianity is that whenever we en- A counter a female character in a text, the surrounding narrative—imbued with strong patri- archal tendencies—overshadows any glimmer of potential prominence she might have.1 Relatedly, when we spot damsels in distress, we eagerly hope that Jesus or one of his fellow male protagonists will be a good ally and challenge the antagonists who are causing the strife.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of Conflict in Church Music History
    Musical Offerings Volume 5 Number 2 Fall 2014 Article 3 11-4-2014 Ancient Worship Wars: An Investigation of Conflict in Church Music History Michael J. Wood Cedarville University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/musicalofferings Part of the Ethnomusicology Commons, Fine Arts Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Liturgy and Worship Commons, Musicology Commons, Music Performance Commons, and the Music Theory Commons DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Recommended Citation Wood, Michael J. (2014) "Ancient Worship Wars: An Investigation of Conflict in Church Music History," Musical Offerings: Vol. 5 : No. 2 , Article 3. DOI: 10.15385/jmo.2014.5.2.3 Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/musicalofferings/vol5/iss2/3 Ancient Worship Wars: An Investigation of Conflict in Church Music History Document Type Article Abstract The purpose of this research is to prove that conflict in church music is nothing new. Even in the time of the early church fathers, dissenting views on what were acceptable and unacceptable practices in church music were present. The music of the 2nd century through the 14th century is examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Ontology and Women in Ministry in the Early Church Carrie L
    Gender Ontology and Women in Ministry in the Early Church Carrie L. Bates Two gender ontologies notionf o the intrinsic worth of every human being into Greco- Roman culture. It based that tenet on Genesis 1:26: All human One’s ontology of gender underlies both hermeneutic precedence beings are equally bearers of God’s image—a concept radically at and exegetical considerations. Is human nature divided into two odds with Aristotle’s philosophy. kinds, male and female, or is it a single nature, shared by males Peter Brown, in his work on the history of permanent sexual and females? The answers to this question drive hierarchist and renunciation in the early church, offers readers a look at Greco- egalitarian hermeneutics and exegesis. Roman notions of gender. Citing second-century medical litera- Deborah. F Sawyer, in her history of women and religion in ture, Brown points out that a Roman man understood the dif- the first Christian centuries, believes that Christianity prescribes ference between himself and women “in terms of a hierarchy distinct gender roles founded on essentialist notions of gender: basedn o nature itself.”8 sYet, hi nature was not irrevocably dif- Men and women are constituted differently and thus function ferent from that of a woman. In fact, a fetus in the womb was differently. She sees these notions, along with similar ones in undifferentiated until it had either amassed a “decisive surplus Judaism, developing from dialogue with classical Greek philo- of ‘heat’ and fervent ‘vital spirit’” that rendered it male, or failed sophical ideas, in particular, with Aristotle’s notion of essential to do so, rendering it female.
    [Show full text]
  • Shaping Christian Identity: the False Scripture Argument in Early Christian Literature Kevin M
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2007 Shaping Christian Identity: The False Scripture Argument in Early Christian Literature Kevin M. (Kevin Michael) Vaccarella Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES SHAPING CHRISTIAN IDENTITY: THE FALSE SCRIPTURE ARGUMENT IN EARLY CHRISTIAN LITERATURE By Kevin M. Vaccarella A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Religion in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded Summer semester, 2007 Copyright © 2007 Kevin M. Vaccarella All Rights Reserved The members of the committee approve the dissertation by Kevin M. Vaccarella defended on June 7, 2007. ___________________________ Nicole Kelley Professor Directing Dissertation ___________________________ John Marincola Outside Committee Member ___________________________ David Levenson Committee Member Approved: ______________________________________ John Corrigan, Chair, Department of Religion ________________________________________________ Joseph Travis, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and confirmed the above named committee members. ii For Jenness iii ACKNOWLEGMENTS My dissertation began with an exploration of texts and a setting with which I was not very familiar. My eventual proficiency with the subject matter was due to a combination of my growing interest in the material and the patient guidance of my dissertation director, Nicole Kelley. It was she who first suggested I investigate the Pseudo-Clementine Homilies. Dr. Kelley’s enthusiastic direction through the Pseudo-Clementines has always been coupled with the freedom to explore comparisons with other writings – a freedom that eventually led me to the Didascalia Apostolorum and Ptolemy's Letter to Flora.
    [Show full text]