DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Compensation 14 ITEM 12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive Compensation 14 ITEM 12 Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549 FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) ☑ Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 OR ☐ Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from to . Commission file number 333-199861 MYLAN N.V. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) The Netherlands 98-1189497 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Building 4, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, England (Address of principal executive offices) +44 (0) 1707 853 000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class: Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered: Ordinary shares, nominal value €0.01 The NASDAQ Stock Market Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☑ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☑ No ☐ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☑ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.: Large accelerated filer ☑ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐ If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☑ The aggregate market value of the outstanding ordinary shares, nominal value €0.01, of the registrant other than shares held by persons who may be deemed affiliates of the registrant, as of June 30, 2016, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $21,822,318,620. The number of ordinary shares outstanding, nominal value €0.01, of the registrant as of April 26, 2017 was 535,946,383. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE None. Table of Contents EXPLANATORY NOTE This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) amends our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, originally filed on March 1, 2017 (the “Original Filing”). We are filing this Amendment to include the information required by Part III and not included in the Original Filing, as we do not intend to file a definitive proxy statement for an annual general meeting of stockholders within 120 days of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, in connection with the filing of this Amendment and pursuant to the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), we are including with this Amendment new certifications of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Accordingly, Item 15 of Part IV has also been amended to reflect the filing of these new certifications. Except as described above, no other changes have been made to the Original Filing. The Original Filing continues to speak as of the date of the Original Filing, and we have not updated the disclosures contained therein to reflect any events which occurred at a date subsequent to the filing of the Original Filing. As used in this Amendment, unless the context requires otherwise, the “Company,” “Mylan,” “our,” and “we” mean Mylan N.V. and its consolidated subsidiaries, “NASDAQ” means The NASDAQ Global Select Stock Market, and “U.S. GAAP” means accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Forward-Looking Statements This Amendment contains “forward-looking statements.” These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements about the acquisition of Meda AB (publ.) (“Meda”) by Mylan (the “Meda Transaction”), Mylan’s acquisition (the “EPD Transaction”) of Mylan Inc. and Abbott Laboratories’ (“Abbott”) non-U.S. developed markets specialty and branded generics business (the “EPD Business”), the potential benefits and synergies of the EPD Transaction and the Meda Transaction, future opportunities for Mylan and products, and any other statements regarding Mylan’s future operations, anticipated business levels, future earnings, planned activities, anticipated growth, market opportunities, strategies, competition, and other expectations and targets for future periods. These may often be identified by the use of words such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “plan,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “potential,” “intend,” “continue,” “target,” and variations of these words or comparable words. Because forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties, actual future results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to: the ability to meet expectations regarding the accounting and tax treatments of the EPD Transaction and the Meda Transaction; changes in relevant tax and other laws, including but not limited to changes in the U.S. tax code and healthcare and pharmaceutical laws and regulations in the U.S. and abroad; actions and decisions of healthcare and pharmaceutical regulators; the integration of the EPD Business and Meda being more difficult, time-consuming, or costly than expected; operating costs, customer loss, and business disruption (including, without limitation, difficulties in maintaining relationships with employees, customers, clients, or suppliers) being greater than expected following the EPD Transaction and the Meda Transaction; the retention of certain key employees of the EPD Business and Meda being difficult; the possibility that Mylan may be unable to achieve expected synergies and operating efficiencies in connection with the EPD Transaction, the Meda Transaction, and the December 2016 announced restructuring program in certain locations, within the expected time-frames or at all and to successfully integrate the EPD Business and Meda; with respect to the Company agreeing to the terms of a $465 million settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice and other government agencies related to the classification of the EpiPen® Auto-Injector and EpiPen Jr® Auto-Injector (collectively, “EpiPen® Auto-Injector”) for purposes of the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, the inability or unwillingness on the part of any of the parties to finalize the settlement, any legal or regulatory challenges to the settlement, and any failure by third parties to comply with their contractual obligations; expected or targeted future financial and operating performance and results; the capacity to bring new products to market, including but not limited to where Mylan uses its business judgment and decides to manufacture, market, and/or sell products, directly or through third parties, notwithstanding the fact that allegations of patent Table of Contents infringement(s) have not been finally resolved by the courts (i.e., an “at-risk launch”); any regulatory, legal, or other impediments to Mylan’s ability to bring new products to market; success of clinical trials and Mylan’s ability to execute on new product opportunities; any changes in or difficulties with our inventory of, and our ability to manufacture and distribute, the EpiPen® Auto-Injector to meet anticipated demand; the potential impact of any change in patient access to the EpiPen® Auto-Injector and the introduction of a generic version of the EpiPen® Auto-Injector; the scope, timing, and outcome of any ongoing legal proceedings, including government investigations, and the impact of any such proceedings on financial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (2) January 2020 CVJ.Pmd
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/cardio.v12i2.47994 Special Article Clarence Walton Lillehei: The Pioneer Open Heart Surgeon Md Anisuzzaman, Nazmul Hosain Department of Cardiac Surgery, Chattogram Medical College Key Words : (Cardiovasc. j. 2020; 12(2): 145-148) Walton Lillehei, Open heart surgery. Introduction: Wangensteen provided a creative environment that Heart as an organ was always a difficult territory produced many brilliant surgeons, and he took a for the surgeons. Famous surgeon Stephen Paget special interest in young Lillehei. in 1895 wrote, “Surgery of the heart has probably In 1949, Dr. Lillehei was appointed a fulltime reached the limit set by the nature, no new instructor of surgery at the University of methods, and no new discovery can overcome the Minnesota Medical School. He began to work his natural difficulties that attend a wound of the way up the academic ladder towards a clinical heart”. But surgeons like Axel Cappelen of Norway professorship. The following year, however fate in 1895, Ludwig Rehn of Germany in 1896 did the dealt him a cruel blow: he was diagnosed with job very well by repairing stab injuries of the heart. lymphosarcoma of the parotid gland and was given But these were rare achievements. Virtually there at most, a 10% chance of surviving for 5 years. was no safe surgical approach or method to deal The day after he finished his senior residency, the heart well before the 1950s. C W Lillehei and Lillehei underwent extensive head and neck his colleagues brought about these changes to surgery at the hands of Dr. Wangensteen and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • EIR) Expertise Guide
    v MEDICAL INDUSTRY LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE 2019–2020 Executive in Residence (EIR) Expertise Guide John J. Alexander, ChEng, MDA [email protected] President, Business Development Advisors, Inc.; Chairman, Twin Cities Angels Funds Roles: Corporate Development, CEO, Management Team Coach Background: St. Jude Medical, Baxter Healthcare, W.R. Grace, GE, Alcoa. Private companies—Wide Range Expertise: (Markets) Medical Technology: devices, diagnostics (Functions) Corporate Development: M&A, strategic alliances, divestitures, licensing, corporate ventures, internal startups starting, building emerging technology businesses and turning-around established businesses; (Functions) venture capital & angel capital, PIPE, venture debt, debt Susan Alpert, PhD, MD [email protected] Principal, SFA Consulting Roles: Regulatory affairs, device evaluation, pediatrician with specialty in infectious disease Background: Medtronic, C.R. Bard, FDA Expertise: Regulatory affairs, FDA, clinical trials, medical devices, business strategy Daniel L. Cosentino, MBA [email protected] CEO, ElectroSea ROLES: CEO, Entrepreneur, Board Advisor, Investor BACKGROUND: Founder & CEO, Cardiocom; VP/GM, Medtronic; Board Advisor, Minnetronix Neuro EXPERTISE: Digital health, medical devices, entrepreneurship, new product development, general management Michael Finch, PhD [email protected] Research Manager, Children’s Hospital MN Roles: Faculty, instructor, research director Background: Carlson School of Management, Children’s Hospital, School of Public Health, UMN, UnitedHealth Group Expertise: Cost, quality and financing of health care in public and private market, research methods and evaluation, valuation of medical innovations, hospital safety, role of physician communication in health care Paul J. Gam, MBA, CGMA, CPA (Inactive) [email protected] Founder and CEO, Zurich Medical Roles: Various management and advisory roles Background: Founder and CEO, Zurich Medical; Board Member, Blue Cross Blue Shield of MN; Partner, Grace Associates; VP International Development, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Programme CONTENT
    48th EDTNA/ERCA International Conference September 14th-17th, 2019 Prague, Czech Republic Conference Theme New Pathways in the Renal Setting-Caring Together by Integrating Modern Technology based on Knowledge & Education Final Programme CONTENT Welcome Message from the President 3 Acknowledgement – Corporate Members 4 Acknowledgement – Conference Support 5 EDTNA/ERCA Booth 6 Conference Accreditation 6 The Conference Application – Instructions and Logistics 7 Conference Venue – Floor plans 8 Programme at a Glance 9 Scientific Programme Highlights 11 Scientific Programme 14 List of E-Posters 24 The Exhibition Floor Plan 30 The Exhibitors 31 Practical Conference Information 36 Opening Hours Summary 38 Good to know about Prague 38 Conference Contacts 39 2 WELCOME MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Colleagues, We are very happy to welcome you to Prague for the 48th EDTNA/ERCA Conference. Last time the Conference was held in Prague was in 2008, now, 11 years later we are back in Prague. The Scientific Programme is well prepared and there will be several Workshops, Educational Sessions and Poster sessions. New this year are the Courses which will be interactive sessions allowing everybody to share their expertise. We are, as an Association, in the forefront of Online Communication and it has been a focus for some years and will continue to be one of our focuses for the coming years. Take the opportunity to download the Conference App. It works both for iPhones and Androids. We should never forget that face to face meetings gives us so much more than just to be in a Video call. It has an important role of educating, exchanging information and experience, utilizing the expertise of all of us i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Connectivity. Access to the Data You Need
    CONNECTIVITY. ACCESS TO THE DATA YOU NEED. Integrate across systems with INVOS™5100C cerebral/ somatic oximetry and BIS™ brain monitoring system. We understand your need for easy access to critical patient Connect to patient monitoring systems for better information — and that requires connectivity to standardized visibility of comprehensive patient data electronic medical record (EMR) systems. Our connectivity ™ ™ ™ solutions integrate vital patient data from INVOS cerebral/ INVOS and BIS monitoring systems connect to a variety ™ of multi-parameter monitors, such as Philips patient somatic oximetry and BIS brain monitoring systems into a ™* ™* variety of clinical information and EMR systems. monitoring systems, using Philips VueLink or IntelliBridge interface solutions. Connect to EMR systems for integrated patient data Additional patient monitoring systems compatible with ™ ™ INVOS™ and BIS™ patient monitoring systems are compatible INVOS and/or BIS monitoring systems include: with most EMR and third-party middleware integration systems INVOS™ cerebral/somatic oximetry system in use today, such as: ∙ Philips EMR ∙ Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA ∙ Olympus ∙ Cerner ∙ Nihon Kohden ∙ Surgical Information Systems ∙ Epic ∙ Mindray ∙ SAFERsleep ∙ McKesson ∙ Fukuda Denshi ∙ Siemens ∙ AGFR Health Care ∙ Hewlett Packard Theronyz ∙ ORBIS ∙ ™* ∙ Agilent ∙ Philips VISICU ∙ Allscripts ™ ™* BIS brain monitoring system Philips Emergin ∙ Daintel ∙ Middleware ∙ Philips ∙ DocuSys ∙ Nanthealth (iSirona) ∙ Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA ∙ Emergisoft ∙ Nihon Kohden General Electric ∙ Capsule Tech ∙ ∙ GE Healthcare ∙ Meditech ∙ Fukuda Denshi Connect to information management systems for Connect to VGA monitors for simultaneous viewing comprehensive clinical records A VGA port on the INVOS™ monitoring system allows the Clinical data management systems such as Anesthesia INVOS™ monitor screen to be displayed on any external Information Management Systems (AIMS), Clinical VGA monitor.
    [Show full text]
  • ASN Kidney Week 2020 Reimagined: Disclosures Page 1
    10/14/2020 ASN Kidney Week 2020 Reimagined: Disclosures Page 1 Last Name First Name Nothing Employer Consultancy Ownership Interest Research Funding Honoraria Patents or Inventions Scientific Advisor or Membership Speakers Bureau Other Interests or Relationships to Disclose Abdel-Kader Khaled Vanderbilt University Medical Center BMC Nephrology; CJASN NKF Education committee; NIDDK Health IT work group Abudayyeh Ala University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Adler Sharon Retrophin; Bristol Myers Squibb; Bayer; Retrophin; Bayer; ChemoCentryx; Omeros; Zyversa Bayer; Zyversa; Retrophin; AstraZeneca; Morphosys Retrophin; Bayer Pharmaceuticals; Zyversa; KDIGO; KRN; NephCure Kidney International AstraZeneca; ChemoCentryx; Omeros; Zyversa; Therapeutics; Calliditas; Morphosys AstraZeneca; Morphosys Foundation; Karger Publishers Morphosys; Karger Afkarian Maryam University of California, Davis Afrouzian Marjan University of Texas Medical Branch Alexion Pharmaceuticals; Banff Foundation Afshinnia Farsad Agarwal Anupam University of Alabama at Birmingham Dynamed - review content related to AKI for Goldilocks Therapeutics Genzyme/Sanofi Fabry Fellowship Award Univ Southern California, Vanderbilt, Emory, Akebia Editorial Board of AJP Renal, Kidney Int and My wife, Lisa Curtis, will be President-elect Dynamed and review updated materials prepared by Lab Investigation; invited to serve on for Women in Nephrology (2018-2019). Dynamed editorial team for AKI topics. Akebia - Advisory board of Goldilocks Therapeutics, Expert Panel to review new therapeutics
    [Show full text]
  • Medtronic 2015 Integrated Performance Report
    FURTHER, TOGETHER 2015 INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT TABLE OF CEO LETTER …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 CONTENTS COMPANY OVERVIEW ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 SUSTAINABiliTY RisK AND OppORTUNITY ……………………………………………………………………………………… 7 VALUE TO SOCIETY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 10 ACCEss …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 11 PATIENT SAFETY …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 20 FiNANCIAL STRENGTH …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 25 COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS …………………………………………………………………………………………………… 34 WORKING RESPONSIBLY ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 40 GOVERNANCE AND ENGAGEMENT ………………………………………………………………………………………… 41 EMplOYEES …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 49 ENVIRONMENT ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 59 SUPPLY CHAIN ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 65 AWARDS AND RECOGNITION ………………………………………………………………………………………………… 68 FY15 DATA SUMMARY …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 69 ABOUT THis REPORT …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 74 GlOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE INDEX ………………………………………………………………………………………… 77 COVER PHOTO: Read Hina’s Story on page 11. MEDTRONIC 2015 INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE REPORT | TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 Since our early days as a company, the Medtronic Mission has remained the same: to alleviate pain, restore health, and extend life for people around the world. We have worked hard to be at the forefront of medical technology innovation, challenging ourselves to develop high-quality
    [Show full text]
  • 1 in the United States District Court for the Eastern
    Case 2:08-cv-00260-DF Document 1 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CARDIO ACCESS LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:08-cv-260 § BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION; § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.; § CORDIS CORPORATION; § ETHICON, INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON; § MEDTRONIC, INC.; MEDTRONIC USA, § INC.; MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC.; § KYPHON, INC.; EDWARDS § LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION; and § EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC, § § Defendants. § PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff CARDIO ACCESS LLC files this Original Complaint against the above-named Defendants, alleging as follows: I. THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff CARDIO ACCESS LLC (“Cardio Access”) is a Texas limited liability company. Cardio Access has its principal place of business in Newport Beach, California and maintains a place of business in Frisco, Texas. 2. Defendant BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION (“BSC”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at One Boston Scientific Place, Natick, Massachusetts 01760. BSC can be served with process through its registered agent, Corporation Service Company DBA, 701 Brazos Street, Suite 1050, Austin, Texas 78701. 1 Case 2:08-cv-00260-DF Document 1 Filed 06/30/08 Page 2 of 7 3. Defendant BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC. (“Scimed”) is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business at 1 Scimed Place, Maple Grove, Massachusetts 55311. Scimed can be served with process through its registered agent, Corporation Service Company, 380 Jackson Street, Suite 700, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. Scimed is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Defendant BSC. 4. Defendant CORDIS CORPORATION (“Cordis”) is a Florida corporation with principal places of business at 14201 Northwest 60th Avenue, Miami Lakes, Florida 33014 and 33 Technology Drive, Warren, New Jersey 07059.
    [Show full text]
  • Medtech and the Internet of Medical Things How Connected Medical Devices Are Transforming Health Care July 2018 Contents
    Medtech and the Internet of Medical Things How connected medical devices are transforming health care July 2018 Contents Foreword 01 Executive summary 02 Part 1. Connectivity is transforming the medtech industry 08 Part 2. Challenges and opportunities for medtech 16 Part 3. Connected medical devices are transforming care 31 Part 4. The future for medtech and the IoMT 40 Appendix: Nomenclature and medical device classifications used in the report 47 Endnotes 48 Contacts 52 Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions The Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions is the research arm of Deloitte LLP’s Life Sciences and Health Care practices. Our goal is to identify emerging trends, challenges, opportunities and examples of good practice, based on primary and secondary research and rigorous analysis. The UK Centre’s team of researchers seeks to be a trusted source of relevant, timely and reliable insights that encourage collaboration across the health value chain, connecting the public and private sectors, health providers and purchasers, patients and suppliers. Our aim is to bring you unique perspectives to support you in the role you play in driving better health outcomes, sustaining a strong health economy and enhancing the reputation of our industry. In this publication, references to Deloitte are references to Deloitte LLP, the UK affiliate of Deloitte NWE LLP, a member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited. Medtech and the Internet of Medical Things | How connected medical devices are transforming health care Foreword Welcome to the Deloitte Centre for Health Solutions’ report Medtech and the Internet of Medical Things: How connected medical devices are transforming health care.
    [Show full text]
  • The Top 10 Medtech States
    U.S. map image from Flickr The Top 10 Medtech States Brian Buntz and We’ve all heard the stereotypes: California is a medtech innovation hotbed. Chris Newmarker Massachusetts has cutting-edge research and Yankee ingenuity. And Minnesotans wake up earlier and work longer hours than everyone. A substantial proportion of While the rankings for the top five medical device companies are fairly the medical device industry is straightforward, there is no single state that can confidently claim to be the clustered in a handful of best spot for all medical device firms. Orthopedic firms, for instance, will find states, although the number many advantages in Indiana while digital health companies would likely of U.S. medtech hubs is growing. fare better in a state like California or Massachusetts. In the following rankings, we take a look at the most recent data available, We ranked the states based weighing everything from business friendliness to overall medical device on medical device employment in each state. Interestingly, the top three states score poorly in employment, patents, NIH funding, VC medical device terms of business environment but score better than all of the other states on funding, and business the list in nearly every other category. friendliness. Read on to discover major data for 10 top medical device states in the United States. 1. California Sure, California has its problems. peripheral equipment Important Statistics: But the state is still unparalleled manufacturing, which employed when it comes to sheer size, 340,000, according to PwC. Medical Device Manufacturing Employment, 2013: boasting more medical device Orange County has long been one 63,307 companies and workers—by far— Medical Device Patents, 2009–2013: of the biggest medical device 10,061 than any other.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Devices 2030 Making a Power Play to Avoid the Commodity Trap Thriving on Disruption Series
    Medical devices 2030 Making a power play to avoid the commodity trap Thriving on disruption series While the outlook for medical device companies appears positive, unsustainable healthcare costs and new competitive forces threaten to alter the future industry landscape. If today’s manufacturers fail to stake their claim in the evolving value chain, they risk being caught in the middle and becoming commoditized. Staying ahead means offering value beyond the device and solving healthcare’s problems – rather than contributing to them. Roger van den Heuvel Chris Stirling KPMG in the US KPMG in the UK Global Strategy Group Anuj Kapadia Jia Zhou KPMG International KPMG in the US KPMG in China Medical devices in 2030 – being part of the solution Reinvent, reposition, reconfigure! The days of simply manufacturing a device, and – new entrants, including competitors from unrelated selling it to healthcare providers via distributors, have industries long vanished. Value is the new byword for success, – new technologies, as technological innovation will prevention the preferred clinical outcome, and continue to outpace clinical innovation intelligence the new competitive advantage. In this paper we discuss the pathway to success in 2030 for medical – new markets, as developing countries continue their device companies, following a three-pronged strategy: high growth trajectories. Reinvent Reconfigure Medical device manufacturers should take a The traditional medical device value chain closer look at their existing organizations and will rapidly evolve, and by 2030 companies reinvent their traditional business and operating models will take on significantly different roles. Following their to adapt to the future, by: reinvention and repositioning, medical device companies – integrating intelligence into their portfolios and offerings, will need to reconfigure their respective value chains to positively influence the care journey and connect and define their place therein.
    [Show full text]
  • Tech Tips Cardiac Devices Updated Labeling for 3T
    TECH TIPS CARDIAC DEVICES UPDATED LABELING FOR 3T Siemens Specific B1+RMS as a Condition of Use Because B1+RMS is now recommended as a supplemental How one modifies scan parameters to affect the B1+RMS metric to SAR, Medtronic has begun to have device may vary slightly between MR system brands based on labeling approved with B1+RMS limits. available options. However, in general, whatever you do to reduce SAR on your system will likely reduce the For a full list of devices and leads approved for the MRI B1+RMS. If your system displays B1+RMS, you will find it in the environment, refer to our MR-conditional Cardiac same area in which you find SAR. Device Summary Chart. Siemens 3T MR Systems ™ SureScan cardiac device 3T labeling is a little different On the Siemens system, B1+RMS is displayed on the than 1.5T labeling in that it uses B1+RMS rather than prediction tab in the SAR information dialog box SAR when landmarking/centering below C7. When (Figure 1). The yellow box in Figure 1 displays the B1+RMS scanning these devices at 1.5 T, SAR must be limited as a percentage of an arbitrary maximum B1+RMS, defined to the Normal Operating Mode. It is important to such that scanner performance will not be limited due remember that the B1+RMS limit applies to 3T ONLY. to B1+RMS. This percentage of limit does not correspond When utilizing B1+RMS as a condition of use at 3T, one can to the B1+RMS limit per the Medtronic labeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Adjusting MRI Scan Sequence SAR and B1+Rms Values
    Guidance for Adjusting MRI scan Sequence SAR and B1+rms Values Note to MRI equipment operators: Carefully review the MRI Guidelines for Medtronic Deep Brain Stimulation Systems before attempting to scan any patient with an implanted Medtronic Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) system. Go to www.medtronic.com/mri or contact Medtronic at 1-800-707-0933 for a copy of the guidelines. Also, carefully review the MRI scanner labeling before proceeding with the scan. This document is intended to provide general guidance on how to adjust MRI scan protocols in accordance with the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) and B1+rms limits identified in the MRI Guidelines for Medtronic Deep Brain Stimulation Systems. The scan protocol adjustments described in this document should only be used by qualified MRI scanner operators. The scanner operator and/or radiologist are responsible for ensuring compliance with the MRI Guidelines for Medtronic Deep Brain Stimulation Systems. The SAR and B1+rms reduction strategies described in this document are based on publicly available MRI scanner information collected in 2015. Medtronic has verified the accuracy of the information for the specific scanner models summarized in this document but does not guarantee the output of any MRI scanner. The third party scanner information and technical details contained in this document are subject to change and Medtronic cannot guarantee their accuracy at the time this document is used. In addition, scanners of different models or manufacturers than those described below may have different scan setting options than described here. Introduction Medtronic has labeling for specific DBS systems that allow head scans with a transmit/receive (T/R) head coil and a maximum SAR of 0.1W/kg.
    [Show full text]