DOCSLIB.ORG

Index of Organisms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index of Organisms INDEX OF ORGANISMS Acer negundo 33 Drosophila mojavensis 153-155, 157-161 Acheta domesticus 65, 265 Drosophila pseudoobscura 19-22, 25-26, Agelenopsis 33,49, 51 28-29, 64, 79, 83, 218 Agelenopsis aperta 33-34, 37, 39, 47 Drosophila paulistorum 2, 97-98, 100-105, Alsophila pometaria 297,299 107 Aneides 291 Drosophila persimilis 19, 22, 64 Aplysia 255, 258-261 Drosophila simulans 64, 79, 84-85, 200, Aplysia calijornica 255 238-239 Archips argyrospilus 305, 307 Drosophila willistoni 20, 207 Archips mortuanus 307 Enallagma hageni 115 Archips semijeranus 305 Ephestia kuehniella 104 Argyrotaenia velutinana 264, 311 Erwinia carnegieana 155 Asclepias curassavica 7 Euphydryas chalcedona 300 Asclepias syriaca 9, 111 Ferocactus acanthodes 154 Aspila virescens 169 Garanium barbadense 169 Bastardia 164 Garanium carolinianum 163 Bastardia viscosa 163 Garanium dissectum 163, 165 Battus philenor 120 Gargaphia solani 135-138, 140-141 Biston betularia 247-248, 252 Gossypium hirsutum 163 Bombyx mori 322 Grapholitha molesta 269, 311 Cajanus cajan 163 Heliothis 168, 312 Callosobruchus macultatus 145-146, 151 Heliothis virescens 55-56, 58-59, 163-164, Carnegiea gigantea 153 166-169 Choristoneura fumijerana 312 Heliothis zea 56, 169 Colias 64, 173, 175-178, 180-181,297 Juniperus osteosperma 33 Colias eurytheme 176, 180-181,312 Ips paraconfusus 306-307 Colias meadii 178 Ips pini 306-307, 312-313 Colias philodice eriphyle 174-182 Lathyrus leucanthus 174 Drosophila 2, 4, 20, 23, 29, 64, 79, 86, 89, Limax maximum 323 155, 197-199, 207, 210, 215-216, 218-220, Liriomyza 186 223, 226, 231-233, 237, 240-241, 243, Liriomyza sativae 185-186, 188, 193 247-248, 251-252, 263, 273, 288, 320-321, Mamestra brassi.cae 323 323 Medicago sativa 174 Drosophila grimshawi 161 Metepeira spinipes 45-52 Drosophila melanogaster 9, 28-29, 61, 80-82, Nicotiana tabacum 163 85, 152, 187-192, 195-196, 199,201,205, Oncopeltus fasciatus 7-10, 13, 16-17 212-213,221,226-228,230-231,237-238, Opuntia ficus-indica 154-155 240-241, 276, 299 Ostrinia nubilalis 263, 308, 310-313 329 330 Index of Organisms Papilio australis 119, 125, 128 Saccharomyces cerevisiae 155 Papilio eurymedon 119-120, 124 Schistrocerca gregaria 323 Papilio glaucus canadensis 119-122, 124-129 Schizocosa 63 Papilio glaucus glaucus 119-131 Schizocosa ocreata 63, 66-75 Papilio multicaudatus 119-120, 124 Schizocosa rovneri 63, 66-75 Papilio polyxenes 295 Solanum carolinense 136 Papilio rutulus 119-121, 125 Spodoptera Iittoralis 307-308 Patalene olyzonaria puber 300 Spodoptera litura 307 Pectinophora gossypiella 169 Sporobolus flexuosus 33 Phormia 320, 323 Stenocereus gummosus 158-159 Phormia regina 161 Stenocereus thurberi 153 Pieris brassicae 323 Teleogryllus com modus 64 Pieris napi macdunnoughii 296-297 Teleogryllus oceanicus 64, 264, 276 Platanus wrightii 33 Tetraopes tetraophthalmus 110-112, 114-115 Platynota flavedana 304-305 Trifolium resupinatum 163 Platynota idea usa/is 304 Vicia americana 174 Plethodon 291 Vicia villosa 163 Rhagoletis 3 Vigna unguiculata 147 Rhagoletis mendax 4 Yponomeuta cagnagellus 299 Rhagoletis pomonella 3-4 Yponomeuta malinellus 299 SUBJECT INDEX Adaptationist program. 173 Behavior (continued) Adaptive behavior pleiotropy and interactions among loci a~ determinants coevolution model. 248 of. 60 evolution of. 248 territorial. 33. 34. 38. 40 mutation and. 297 cis-vaccenyl alcohol and. 227 pleiotropic model. 248 Bruchid beetle. 145-152 spider mites. 297 geographic strains. 145 ARe/el1ops;s aperta. territoriality and. 34 host preference. 297 Alcohol adaptation. 248-249 mating behavior :-,train variations. 149 alcohol dehydrogenase and. 248 oviposition behavior. 146 genetic basis. 248 male effect on. 145 Allozyme analysis. 36 Buyozoan~. sociality. 43 Artificial selection. natural selection and. 291 Budworm moths. hybrids. pheromone phenotypes. 312 Associative conditioning. 241 Butterflies Associative learning. 323 inheritance of court~hip communication systems in. 64 Assortive mating. 80. 83 supergene. 64 founder-flush·crash episodes and. 85 host plant preference and. 186 Cankerworms, 299 negative. 312 Cannibali,m Aversion learning. 323 genetic variability in propensity for. 55-56 polygenic model. 59 Bark beetle. pheromone. as a strong behavioral antago­ Carboxylesterase. see EST-6 nist. 306 Caterpillars Behavior feeding behavior. 320 adaptive. 248 gu~tatory receptors. variability responses of. 323 aggressive, 44 Cellular function. sex and. 278 alcohol avoidance. 252 Central excitatory stale classification. 319 consequence of establishing. 322 defined. 319 defined. 322 digging, 200 duration. 322 effect of a carboxylesterase on. 223-236 Central inhibitory state egg layering. 255 defined. 322 escape. 276 duration. 322 genes and. 19. 273 Cercal sensory system. 276-278 genetic control, mutation and. 4 Chemical ()vipo~ition preference assay. 17R genetic correlations Chromosomal polymorphism evolution and. 197 Drosoph;{a pseudoohscura, 19 phenotypic and genotypic. 197 gcotactic behavior and. 21 genetic methods used for dissection of. 275 Chromosome number. reproductive i~olation and. 85 habitat selection. 33 Circadian rhythm host choice. 173. 174. 175 courtship song and. 218 induction as means of altering. 323 evidence for genetic control. 215-221 male lipids and. 227 of locomotor activity. 238 maternal defensive. 135-143 mutation~ and. 232 mating. see Mating behavior thoracic nervou~ sy~tcm and. 21 X physiological capacities and. 295 Cladogene,is. ftush-crash cycles and. 79 331 332 Subject Index Classical conditioning, 322 Drosophila melanogaster (('olltinun/) Coadaptation vagility among strains, 30 genetic hypotheses, 247 Drosophila mojarensis unive"ality, 247 hahitat selection behavior, 153-162 Coleoptera, feeding behavior, 320 oviposition behavior. congenital preference in, 161 Co/ia,1 philoJice niplnlt, host utilization, 174 Dro,\Ophila pauIiS{()nWl Colonies endosymbionb, 97 invertebrates, 43 cell-wall dcticiency, IOJ I'S social groups, 43 identification of, 102-105 Color polymorphism tetracycline and, 105 genetic and physiological mechanism in, 126 ubiquity, 102 significance, 129 flow diagram of pas~age of infectiou~ agenb in. 103 Colorado potato beetle, 320 hybrid sterility, 98 Corn borer, 308-317 neotropical semispecic~. 97 Cotton leafworm moth, 307 sexual selection, 98 Coumhip, 33, see also Mating behavior Drosophila pseudoob,H'ura. chromo~omal polymorphi~m, Courtship song 19 location of genes controlling. 64 Drosophila simu/ans. a... ideal ~pecimcn for mating exper­ prestimulation, aftereffects, 241 iments, 85 rhythm, circadian rhythm and, 218 species-specificity, 238 Eastern tiger swallowtail butterfly, 119-134 Cricket~. mating behavior. 2 color determination by autosomal gene. 121 color polymorphism Damselfly genetic and phy~iological mcchani~m~ in, 1~6 mating behavior, 115 ~igniticance. 12Y reproduction character di~placemcnt in \\-ing patterns. cytoplasmic inheritance a~ explanation for variation in 306 offspring. 124 Digging behavior, polygenic control, 200 female wing paltern~. alterations in, 126 Directional selection reproductive isolation, 119 genetic correlations alllong traib in. 285 subspecies, 119 pleiotropy and, 285 Egg laying hormone Disruptive selection, polymorphism, 295 encoding in polyprotein precursor. 256 DNA ~equencc. variations in. transcriptional ~pecificity gene, 256 and, 260 gene family Drosophila precu",,, polypeptides encoded hy, 259 alcohol adaptation, 248-249 secificity, 259 circadian rhythm. di\fupted, 232 gene products. 256 EST-6 and behavior of. 223-236 polyprotein precursor. 257 feeding bchavior, 320 target tissue, 255 hybrids between species of. 64 Egyptian cotton Icafworm moth, 307 male courtship song rhythm, circadian rhythm and, 218 Elens-Wattiaux mating chamber, 101 mating behavior, 2 End()~ymbionts mating ~ite~. 86 Drosophila paulis/orunJ, 97 mating ~ong, location of genes controlling, 64 identification, 102-105 model for ("cillator, 218 tetracycline and, 105 mutation, circadian defects, 232 ubiyuity, 102 populations. microgeographic genetic variation. 20 Epipharyngeal receptors, 320 seminal fluid. components of. 232 Escape behavior. induced hy cercal stimulation, 276 ,exual receptivity of mated females, EST-6 and, 226 EST-6 sexual selection, 89-95 bio,ynthesis, 224 song rhythms, species-specificity, 238 electrophoretic varianb. 223 sterile male remating experimenh. 224-225 genetic locus. 213 thoracic nervous ~y ... tem, circadian rhythm and. 21S I()cu~, ontogenetic expres~ion. 224 Drosophila wimshaH'i, coloni/ation of plant host, 161 long-term behavioral effects, 224 Drosophila melanogasler mating behavior and, 230-231 courtship pheromone sy~tem. genetic control of. 312 remating and. 224 mating speed. genetic basis, 64 short-term behavioral effccb. 226 third instar larvae, 19~-208 substrate for. 227 age and behavior, relationship between, 202-206 tra'bport for female, 224 larval foraging behavior. 198-202 Esterase, 40 prepupation behavior. 206-208 Eurporean corn borer, 30X-317 Subject Index 333 Evolution Host preference (col1linucd) basic factors for, 153 mutation of taste receptors and. 299 host preference, 300 silkworm, 299 host utilization, 174 specificity, 299 Host suitability, host choice behavior and, 182 Feeding behavior, 320-322 Host utilization, 173-184 aversion behavior, 323 Colias philoilicc eripln'lc, 174 caterpillar, 320 evolution, 174 Coleoptera, 320 in no-choice situations l'S choice situations. 181 Drosophila, 320 Hydrozoans, 43 genetic analysis, 321 genetic control. 322 Induction, 322 Lepidoptera, 320 behavioral changes by,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WO 2017/023486 Al 9 February 2017 (09.02.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/023486 Al 9 February 2017 (09.02.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: 0552 (US). FENGLER, Kevin; 7250 NW 62nd Ave, P.O. AOlH l/00 (2006.01) C07K 14/195 (2006.01) Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). SCHEPERS, A01H3/00 (2006.01) C12N 15/82 (2006.01) Eric; 7250 NW 62nd Ave, P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). UDRANSZKY, Ingrid; 7250 NW 62nd (21) International Application Number: Ave, P.O. Box 552, Johnston, IA 5013 1-0552 (US). PCT/US20 16/04 1452 (74) Agent: BAUER, S., Christopher; Pioneer Hi-Bred Inter (22) International Filing Date: national, Inc., 7100 N.W. 62nd Avenue, Johnston, IA 8 July 2016 (08.07.2016) 5013 1-1014 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, (30) Priority Data: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, 62/201,977 6 August 2015 (06.08.2015) US DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (71) Applicants: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, INC. [US/US]; PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, INC., 7100 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. EPA, Pesticide Product Label, JAVELIN WG, 03/25/2008
    . '. .3 - d-S-J-oog- . UNITED S(=~ES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AG('~CY Christine A. Dively MAR 25 2008 Director of Regulatory Affairs Certis USA 9145 Guilford Road, Suite 175 Columbia, MD 21046 Dear Ms. Dively: Subject: Javelin WG (EPA Reg. No. 70051-66) Label submitted for Bt reregistration !' . As part of the reregistration ofBt microbial pesticides, the Agency has issued a stamped approved label for each reregistered product. Part of the labeling that was required for reregistrationwas an Environmental Hazards statement containing language to protect endangered or threatened Lepidoptera. After finalizing reregistration of the subject product, the Agency was made aware that registrants were given an erroneous version of the Environmental Hazard statement to include on product labels. .The correct statement should read as follows: "This product must not be applied aerially within 1/4 mile of any habitats of endangered or threatened Lepidoptera. No manual application can be made within 300 feet of any threatened or endangered Lepidoptera." . In light of this error, EPA has re-stamped the label forthe subject product with the corrected Environmental Hazards text. A copy of the label is enclosed for yoUr records. If you have any questions, please contact Alan Reynolds of my staff at (703) 605-0515 (e-mail: [email protected]). Sincerely, Sheryl Reilly, Ph.D., Branch Chief Microbial Pesticides Branch (7511P) Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division Enclosure CONCURRENCES' SYMBOL .. '/ S"lj () '. SURNAME ~ ··4····· ·lJ..~·: .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011
    Keystone Ancient Forest Preserve Resource Management Plan 2011 Osage County & Tulsa County, Oklahoma Lowell Caneday, Ph.D. With Kaowen (Grace) Chang, Ph.D., Debra Jordan, Re.D., Michael J. Bradley, and Diane S. Hassell This page intentionally left blank. 2 Acknowledgements The authors acknowledge the assistance of numerous individuals in the preparation of this Resource Management Plan. On behalf of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department’s Division of State Parks, staff members were extremely helpful in providing access to information and in sharing of their time. In particular, this assistance was provided by Deby Snodgrass, Kris Marek, and Doug Hawthorne – all from the Oklahoma City office of the Oklahoma Tourism and Recreation Department. However, it was particularly the assistance provided by Grant Gerondale, Director of Parks and Recreation for the City of Sand Springs, Oklahoma, that initiated the work associated with this RMP. Grant provided a number of documents, hosted an on-site tour of the Ancient Forest, and shared his passion for this property. It is the purpose of the Resource Management Plan to be a living document to assist with decisions related to the resources within the park and the management of those resources. The authors’ desire is to assist decision-makers in providing high quality outdoor recreation experiences and resources for current visitors, while protecting the experiences and the resources for future generations. Lowell Caneday, Ph.D., Professor Leisure Studies Oklahoma State University Stillwater,
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management
    Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management Since the early days of integrated pest management a sound ecological foundation has been considered essential for the development of effective systems. From time to time, there have been attempts to evaluate the ways in which ecological theory is exploited in pest control, and to review the lessons that ecologists learn from pest management. In the last 20 years there have been many developments within the contribution of ecological theory to integrated pest management, and the objective of this book is to capture some of the new themes in both pest management and ecology that have emerged and to provide an updated assessment of the role that basic ecology plays in the development of rational and sustainable pest management practices. The major themes are examined, assessing the significance and potential impact of recent technological and conceptual developments for the future of integrated pest management. Marcos Kogan is Professor and Director Emeritus of the Integrated Plant Protection Center at Oregon State University. Paul Jepson has been Director of the Integrated Plant Protection Center at Oregon State University since 2002. Perspectives in Ecological Theory and Integrated Pest Management edited by Marcos Kogan and Paul Jepson Oregon State University cambridge university press Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sa˜o Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521822138 ß Cambridge University Press 2007 This publication is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. FishFish & & Wildlife Wildlife Service Service Moths of Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Established in 1994, the 25,000-acre Givira arbeloides Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge Prionoxystus robiniae is a remnant of what was once a much Carpenterworm Moth larger, frequently flooded, bottomland hardwood forest. You are still able to Crambid Snout Moths (Crambidae) view vast expanses of ridge and swale Achyra rantalis floodplain features, numerous bayous, Garden Webworm Moth oxbow lakes, and cypress/tupelo swamps Aethiophysa invisalis along the Trinity River. It is one of Argyria lacteella only 14 priority-one bottomland sites Milky Urola Moth identified for protection in the Texas Carectocultus perstrialis Bottomland Protection Plan. Texas is Reed-boring Crambid Moth home to an estimated 4,000 species of Chalcoela iphitalis moths. Most of the nearly 400 species of Sooty-winged Chalcoela moths listed below were photographed Chrysendeton medicinalis around the security lights at the Refuge Bold Medicine Moth Headquarters building located adjacent Colomychus talis to a bottomland hardwood forest. Many Distinguished Colomychus more moths are not even attracted to Conchylodes ovulalis lights, so additional surveys will need Zebra Conchylodes to be conducted to document those Crambus agitatellus species. These forests also support a Double-banded Grass-veneer wide diversity of mammals, reptiles, Crambus satrapellus amphibians, and fish with many feeding Crocidophora tuberculalis on moths or their larvae. Pale-winged Crocidophora Moth Desmia funeralis For more information, visit our website: Grape leaf-folder www.fws.gov/southwest Desmia subdivisalis Diacme elealis Contact the Refuge staff if you should Paler Diacme Moth find an unlisted or rare species during Diastictis fracturalis your visit and provide a description.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) for Platynota Flavedana Platynota
    Rapid Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) for Platynota flavedana Platynota idaeusalis Platynota rostrana STAGE 1: INITIATION 1. What is the name of the pest? Three species are considered in this PRA because there are considerable similarities in their biology and all three are only present in the new world. All are tortricid moths (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). Platynota flavedana Clemens, variegated leafroller (VLR) Platynota idaeusalis (Walker), tufted apple bud moth (TBAM) Platynota rostrana (Walker), orange leafroller Brown et al. (2011b) have suggested that P. rostrana may be a species complex, but the precise status has not been confirmed and it is treated as one species here. There are no known taxonomic issues with either P. flavedana or P. idaeusalis. However, many species in Platynota are very similar, both as larvae and adults, and species identification can be problematic, particularly where the precise geographic origin of the specimen is unclear or the adult is in a worn condition. 2. What initiated this rapid PRA? Platynota sp. larvae, believed to be either P. rostrana or P. flavedana, were detected on Annona muricata (custard apples) imported from Jamaica in August 2011. Although the consignment was not held in this case, it was anticipated that statutory action would be recommended following any future finds. As a result, the three species of Platynota included in this PRA (as well as a fourth species, P. stultana, which is covered in a separate PRA) were included in Phase I of the UK Plant Health Risk Register in 2013, and all were identified as a priority for PRA. 3. What is the PRA area? The PRA area is the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/105987 Al 22 June 2017 (22.06.2017) W P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/105987 Al 22 June 2017 (22.06.2017) W P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: Ave, Po Box 552, Johnston, Iowa 5013 1 (US). ORAL, C07K 14/21 (2006.01) C12R 1/38 (2006.01) Jarred Kenneth; 7250 Nw 62nd Ave, Po Box 552, John C12N 15/82 (2006.01) A01N 63/02 (2006.01) ston, Iowa 5013 1 (US). PEREZ-ORTEGA, Claudia; 7250 Nw 62nd Ave, Po Box 552, Johnston, Iowa 5013 1 (21) International Application Number: (US). ROSEN, Barbara Ann Marie; 7250 Nw 62nd Ave, PCT/US2016/06553 1 Po Box 552, Johnston, Iowa 501 3 1 (US). SCHELLEN- (22) International Filing Date: BERGER, Ute; 914 Moreno Avenue, Palo Alto, Califor 8 December 2016 (08.12.2016) nia 94303 (US). WEI, Jun-Zhi; 7250 Nw 62nd Ave, Po Box 552, Johnston, Iowa 5013 1 (US). XIE, Weiping; (25) Filing Language: English 7250 Nw 62nd Ave, Po Box 552, Johnston, Iowa 5013 1 (26) Publication Language: English (US). ZHONG, Xiaohong; 7250 Nw 62nd Ave, Po Box 552, Johnston, Iowa 5013 1 (US). ZHU, Genhai; 7250 Nw (30) Priority Data: 62nd Ave, Po Box 552, Johnston, Iowa 5013 1 (US). 62/269,482 18 December 201 5 (18. 12.2015) US (74) Agent: BAUER, S., Christopher; PIONEER HI-BRED (71) Applicants: PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INTERNATIONAL, INC., 7100 N.W. 62nd Avenue, P.O. INC. [US/US]; 7100 N.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Etitions (10-188-01P and 12-185-01P) for Determinations of Nonregulated Status for Dicamba- Resistant Soybean and Cotton Varieties
    Monsanto Petitions (10-188-01p and 12-185-01p) for Determinations of Nonregulated Status for Dicamba- Resistant Soybean and Cotton Varieties Final Environmental Impact Statement December 2014 Agency Contact: Sid Abel Biotechnology Regulatory Services 4700 River Road USDA, APHIS Riverdale, MD 20737 Fax: (301) 734-6352 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’S TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326–W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410 or call (202) 720–5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of companies or commercial products in this report does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture over others not mentioned. USDA neither guarantees nor warrants the standard of any product mentioned. Product names are mentioned solely to report factually on available data and to provide specific information. This publication reports research involving pesticides. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish and other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly.
    [Show full text]
  • JAVELIN WG Interval (REI) of 4 Hours
    SPECIMEN LABEL. UPDATES AVAILABLE AT WWW.GREENBOOK.NET 1 Certis USA Do not apply this product in a way that will contact workers or other persons, either directly or through drift. Only protected handlers may be in the area during application. ® Do not enter or allow worker entry into treated areas during the restricted entry JAVELIN WG interval (REI) of 4 hours. For Control of Insect Pests of Vegetables, Fruit and Field Crops PPE required for early entry to treated areas that is permitted under the Worker Active Ingredient: Protection Standard and that involves contact with anything that has been treated, Bacillus thuringiensis, subspecies kurstaki such as plants, soil, or water is: Potency of 52,863 Spodoptera Units (at least 60 million viable spores) • Coveralls per milligram* . 7.5% • Waterproof gloves Inert Ingredients:. 92.5% • Shoes plus socks TOTAL . 100.0% Potency units should not be used to adjust use rates beyond those specified in the NOTICE: Read ‘‘Limitation of Warranty and Limitation of Liability’’ on the Directions for Use section. container or in this Directions for Use section before buying or using. If terms are not acceptable, return at once, unopened. *Equivalent to 24.0 billion Spodoptera units per pound (17.0 billion International Units per pound). Unless specifically stated, do not apply this product through any type of irrigation system. EPA Reg. No. 70051-66 JAVELIN® WG is a biological insecticide for the control of lepidopterous larvae EPA Est. No. 70051-CA-001 (see Recommended Application Rates section). KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN JAVELIN WG attacks the larval gut and must be ingested by the insect to be effective.
    [Show full text]
  • Quirements for the Degree Of
    \Bionomics of Platynota flavedana Clemens and P. idaeusalis (Walkery’ (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Virginia Apple Orchards - by Paul J.“DavidIl Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY · in Entomology APPROVED: 7R. L. Horsburgh, Chairman €;;é Q;. äé J. A. Barden L. Eaton ,2/.;. 7/ ,24G.7 , Q I. Ho ma R. L. Pienkowski March, 1985 Blacksburg, Virginia · BIONOMICS OF PLATYNOTA FLAVEDANA CLEMENS AND P. IDAEUSALIS §_ (WALKER) (LEPIDOPTERA:TORTRICIDAE) IN VIRGINIA APPLE ä? ORCHARDS by V Paul J. David Committee Chairman: Robert L. Horsburgh Entomology (ABSTRACT) The effects of pheromone trap placement on male moth catches of both species were studied. For P. flavedana, traps hung at 2.1 and 3.0 meters captured the greatest num- ber of moths. Trap heights of 1.2, 2.1, and 3.0 meters caught the greatest number of P. idaeusalis moths. The out- side-the-canopy trap position captured more P. flavedana moths, while the within-canopy trap location caught the greatest number of P. idaeusalis moths. Traps placed in the west portion of the tree captured the greatest number of P. flavedana moths. P. idaeusalis moth catches were not influ— — enced by compass quadrants. Trap design and pheromone dis- penser and rate influenced trap catches of P. flavedana. Development of Q. flavedana and Q. idaeusalis on a mer- idic diet was observed at constant temperatures in the labo- ratory. Lower developmental threshold values for egg, lar- val, and pupal stages of Q. flavedana were: 10.6, 8.6, 9.o°c, respectively.
    [Show full text]