DOCSLIB.ORG

PW Pavement Management Program Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PW Pavement Management Program Report PTAP-21 Napa County Final Report 2020-21 Pavement Management Program Update March 17, 2021 Prepared by: The preparation of this report has been financed in part by grants from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms & Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. iii I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 II. Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2 III. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 IV. Network Description and Inventory ................................................................................................ 4 V. Existing Pavement Condition ............................................................................................................ 5 VI. Pavement Management Strategies ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Budget Needs ............................................................................................................................... 11 VIII. Budget Analysis/Scenarios.......................................................................................................... 12 A. No Funds ($0) ..................................................................................................................... 14 B. Expected Annual Budget (Various Annual Budgets) ................................................................ 15 C. Maintain PCI of 45 ($12.5M) .................................................................................................... 16 D. Five Point Increase in PCI ($15M) ........................................................................................... 17 E. Budget Needs Average ($35M) ................................................................................................. 18 F. Residentials PCI = 60; Arterials/Collectors PCI = 70 ............................................................... 19 IX. Recommendations .......................................................................................................................... 24 A. Limits of Study ................................................................................................................... 24 B. Maintenance Strategy Development ................................................................................... 25 C. Annual Budget Projects ...................................................................................................... 25 D. Maintenance Strategy Assignments .................................................................................... 25 E. Maintenance Decisions ....................................................................................................... 31 F. Pavement Management Program Reports ........................................................................... 32 G. System Maintenance ........................................................................................................... 32 X. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................... 32 A. Program Budget Options .................................................................................................... 32 B. PMP Suggestions ................................................................................................................ 33 C. Next Steps ........................................................................................................................... 34 Appendix I – Pavement Condition Index & Remaining Service Life Section PCI/RSL Listing Report Appendix II - Budget Analysis Report A. Budget Needs Report and Treatment Cost Details– Ten Years B. Average PCI by Annual Funding Chart C. Deferred Maintenance Cost Trend by Annual Funding Chart D. Budget Scenario Cost and Network Condition Summaries E. Annual Work Program I (Various Annual Budgets) F. Annual Work Program II (Residentials PCI = 60, Arterials/Collectors PCI= 70) Appendix III - Backup Data A. Section Description Inventory Report B. Inventory of Applied Maintenance C. Maintenance Treatment Decision Tree i LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 Historical PCI Trends ............................................................................................................... 3 Table 2 Pavement Mileage by Functional Class .................................................................................... 4 Table 3 PCI Breakdown Descriptions .................................................................................................... 5 Table 4 PCI by Functional Class............................................................................................................ 6 Table 5 Percentage of Network Area by Functional Class and Condition Category ............................. 7 Table 6 Agency’s Maintenance Treatments by Condition Category ................................................... 10 Table 7 Network Replacement Value .................................................................................................. 10 Table 8 Budget Needs Analysis ........................................................................................................... 11 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Pavement Condition Index by Annual Funding Level ............................................................ 1 Figure 2 Percentage of Network by Functional Class ............................................................................ 4 Figure 3 Alligator Cracking Deduct Curve ............................................................................................ 6 Figure 4 Centerline Miles of Road by Condition ................................................................................... 7 Figure 5 Pavement Management – Applying Cost Effective Treatment ............................................... 8 Figure 6 Maintenance Activities and PCI .............................................................................................. 9 Figure 7 PCI Chart ............................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 8 Deferred Maintenance Chart ................................................................................................. 22 Figure 9 PCI and Deferred Maintenance Chart ................................................................................... 23 Figure 10 Pavement Condition Changes Under Budget Scenarios ...................................................... 24 ii ACRONYMS & ABBREVIATIONS AC: Asphalt Concrete CIP: Capital Improvement Plan DBE: Disadvantage Business Enterprise DM: Deferred Maintenance FC: Functional Classification FDR: Full Depth Reclamation FHWA: Federal Highway Administration GASB: Governmental Accounting Standards Board GIS: Geographic Information System HMAC: Hot Mix Asphalt Concrete MS: Microsurfacing MTC: Metropolitan Transmission Commission OL: Overlay PCC: Portland Cement Concrete PCI: Pavement Condition Index PM: Preventative Maintenance PMP: Pavement Management Program PTAP: Pavement Technical Assistance Program ST: Surface Type iii PTAP-21 – Napa County 2020-21 Pavement Management Program Update Final Report – March 17, 2021 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In October to December of 2020, Harris & Associates updated the Pavement Management Program (PMP) for the County of Napa under a contract with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) of the San Francisco Bay Area for their Pavement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP), Round 21. The County has a total approximately 411 centerline miles and 826 total lane miles in their entire road network. For this update, a total of 333 centerline miles were surveyed as part of the PTAP-21 project and an additional 55 centerline miles were surveyed as part of a direct contract with the County. Roads that received maintenance within the past two years (approximately 5 centerline miles), roads with planned maintenance (approximately 27 centerline miles), and gravel roads (approximately 8 centerline miles) were not included in the field distress surveys. The PMP provides a management tool to inventory road pavement, assess pavement condition, record historical maintenance, forecast budget needs, and view impacts of funding on Countywide pavement condition over time. After the condition survey, the Countywide average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) is currently at a 45. The overall condition of Napa County’s road network rests in the “Poor” condition range. For the County of Napa, the following six annual budget scenarios were generated with 12% of the annual budget applied towards preventative maintenance. 1. No Funds ($0) 2. Expected Annual Budget (Various Annual Budgets) 3. Maintain PCI of 45 ($12.5M) 4. Five Point Increase in PCI ($15M) 5. Budget Needs Average ($35M) 6. Residentials PCI = 60, Arterials/Collectors
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENT
    2016/2017 Count Summary 2018 Count Summary PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Scooters Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped ID City North/South East/West Riding Riding 1 Alameda BROADWAY LINCOLN AVENUE 35 8 5 4 93 29 69 49 10 3 4 - 92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 69 10 25 12 113 63 190 71 18 10 - - 87 52 124 3 Alameda MAIN ST RALPH APPEZATO MEMORIAL PARKWAY 97 15 51 7 24 27 3 1 1 2 14 4 Alameda PARK STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 42 33 2 - 1,039 21 1,561 73 29 25 - 1 1,262 28 1,584 5 Alameda PARK STREET OTIS DRIVE 35 23 6 - 332 22 317 65 23 15 15 5 335 10 296 6 Alameda WEBSTER STREET ATLANTIC AVENUE 33 18 4 - 425 34 627 26 24 19 - 5 301 20 440 7 Alameda WEBSTER ST SANTA CLARA AVE 41 19 15 7 514 50 18 19 1 4 479 8 Alameda County ASHLAND AVE LEWELLING BLVD 12 3 8 1 33 13 90 13 1 7 5 1 33 12 122 9 Alameda County CENTER ST CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 2 - - - 25 4 16 21 15 6 3 12 15 4 10 Alameda County REDWOOD RD CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 45 29 7 6 195 21 134 26 22 7 - 205 16 181 11 Alameda County E 14TH ST 159TH AVE 23 13 11 - 202 24 15 12 - 160 12 Alameda County FOOTHILL BLVD 164TH AVE.
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Have Any Other Comments About Upper Solano Avenue?
    Do you have any other comments about Upper Solano Avenue? # Response Date Response Text 1 Sep 12, 2010 8:39 PM Need wider sidewalks for outdoor seating and street trees Definitely change the restaurant permit limit issue. It makes restaurants less competitive; if you have a permit, you stay because new ones can't come in and compete. It discourages staying current 2 Sep 12, 2010 9:04 PM and investment in older restaurants, and once the restaurant business get lazy, then the whole street loses it's competitive edge. Look at Oakland. They are doing something right. Please don't let the NIMBYs and "Party of No" stop 3 Sep 12, 2010 11:06 PM improvements! 4 Sep 13, 2010 12:28 AM Signal at The Alameda should be made pedestrian safer. Upper Solano has INSUFFICIENT PARKING. That's what keeps 5 Sep 13, 2010 3:27 AM me away. I only go there as often as I do to go to La Farine bakery on Sunday mornings. It's a bit staid. I drive to Oakland to go to dinner on Telegraph (e.g. Pizzaiola, Dona Tomas) or Piedmont Ave (e.g. Dopo) rather than 6 Sep 14, 2010 3:17 AM going to Solano. Needs more cafes with outdoor seating. Needs more life in the evening. Could use a place like Oakland's Bakesale Betty's to draw traffic. I would like to see a variety of businesses on Solano that would provide local shopping for residents. An increase in the number of restaurants would not accomplish this goal.
    [Show full text]
  • Visit-Berkeley-Official-Visitors-Guide
    Contents 3 Welcome 4 Be a Little Berkeley 6 Accommodations 16 Restaurants 30 Local Libations 40 Arts & Culture 46 Things to Do 52 Shopping Districts 64 #VisitBerkeley 66 Outdoor Adventures & Sports 68 Berkeley Marina 70 Architecture 72 Meetings & Celebrations 76 UC Berkeley 78 Travel Information 80 Transportation 81 Visitor & Community Services 82 Maps visitberkeley.com BERKELEY WELCOMES YOU! The 2018/19 Official Berkeley Visitors Guide is published by: Hello, Visit Berkeley, 2030 Addison St., Suite #102, Berkeley, CA 94704 (510) 549-7040 • www.visitberkeley.com Berkeley is an iconic American city, richly diverse with a vibrant economy inspired in EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE great measure by our progressive environ- Greg Mauldin, Chairman of the Board;General Manager, Hotel Shattuck Plaza Vice Chair, (TBA); mental and social policies. We are internationally recognized for our arts Thomas Burcham, Esq., Secretary/Treasurer; Worldwide Farmers and culinary scenes, as well as serving as home to the top public univer- Barbara Hillman, President & CEO, Visit Berkeley sity in the country – the University of California, Berkeley. UC Berkeley BOARD OF DIRECTORS is the heart of our city, and our neighborhood districts surround the Cal John Pimentel, Account Exec/Special Projects, Hornblower Cruises & Events campus with acclaimed restaurants, great independent shops and galleries, Lisa Bullwinkel, Owner; Another Bullwinkel Show world-class performing arts venues, and wonderful parks. Tracy Dean, Owner; Design Site Hal Leonard, General Manager; DoubleTree by Hilton Berkeley Marina I encourage you to discover Berkeley’s signature elements, events and Matthew Mooney, General Manager, La Quinta Inn & Suites LaDawn Duvall, Executive Director, Visitor & Parent Services UC Berkeley engaging vibe during your stay with us.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Guardian
    THE SAN FRANCISCO B A Y OCTOBER 17, 1990/VOL 25/NO. 2 ^AY AREA'S BEST. .. EVERY WEEK ON THE COVER: UNKNOWN NO MORE After five years of struggle, SFs Faith No More is on its way, with a Grammy nomination, an MTV video award and an album that's gone platinum (p. 23) ARTS ^ MILLION PG&EiOVER-UP For two years, ArtAgnos has had a study on his desk showing that the city would make as much as $500 million by buying out PG&E. Why has he kept it secret? (p. 17) DARK PASSAGES It's anomie again in America as the literary world rediscovers the hard-boiled noir fiction style of the '40s. ►P/us: Lesbian detective fiction. The SF Book Festival, reviews and more. Our quarterly literary supplement ESSL'i". MONSTER LECTRONICS UNCLE WHO?? Uncle Ralph’s is the East Bay’s largest independent audio/video specialist, with some of the best prices in the country, in 8 years we’ve grown at an incredible rate, and our reputation has spread far and wide. Our customers come from as far away as New York, Tokyo, an even Minsk! This is your big chance to gobble up hundreds of amazing buys from our gargantuan inventory. WHArS GOING ON?? Our warehouse is stocked to the gills with top name merchandise, and it’s gotta go! Every¬ thing is new, in the box, with the manufac¬ turer’s warranty. But shop early, because the sale is limited to stock on hand! There are ac¬ tually hundred of items on sale.
    [Show full text]
  • EXACTLY OPPOSITE the Newsletter of the Berkeley Historical Society Volume 36 Number 1 WINTER 2018 “Ready, Aim, Sing!” – Songs of Protest by Ed Herny
    EXACTLY OPPOSITE The Newsletter of the Berkeley Historical Society Volume 36 Number 1 WINTER 2018 “Ready, Aim, Sing!” – Songs of Protest By Ed Herny Joan Baez singing in the December 1964 Singer Phil Ochs at first Vietnam Day, FSM Rally. Photo courtesy of Ron Enfield. Berkeley, May 1965. Photo courtesy of Ron Enfield. When Tom Lehrer wrote the above lyric as the concluding line of “Folk Song Army” in 1965, he was being witty and sarcastic in his classic “mocking” style, but not entirely fair. His point was that the injustice in the world called out for people of action, not just those who wrote and sang songs about it. The larger truth was that the best of the politically motivated songs could and did, in a way that only music could, inspire a generation of youth to become aware of the injustice and, indeed, take action against it. Music, by its effect on emotion, combined with the truth embedded in great lyrics proved to be a potent formula for the raising of the political consciousness that engenders action. Berkeley played a major role in creating and disseminating these songs of protest in the 1960s. In Berkeley in the 1960s, the two areas of injustice that cried out for protest the loudest were civil rights and war. Of the two, the civil rights movement inspired the greatest number and variety of protest songs. These songs had been written and performed long before this decade, as far back as the history of racial injustice in America. By the nine- teenth century they had become far more numerous, and by the middle of the twentieth century even more so.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Solano Stroll Press Release – Cancellation (PDF)
    The Solano Avenue Association and Solano Stroll 510-527-5358 SolanoStroll.org For Immediate release: Please forward to all lists. The Solano Avenue Association and Stroll: Albany and Berkeley, California - USA 46th Annual Solano Avenue Stroll in Albany and Berkeley Cancelled Event Date was: September 13 2020 (Sunday) from 10 am – 5 pm Where: Solano Avenue in Berkeley & Albany, California - USA Contact: Allen Cain at 510-527-5358 / [email protected] We are sad to announce that we must cancel the 2020 Solano Avenue Stroll. This is a joint decision made by the City of Albany and the City of Berkeley in consultation with the Alameda County Health Department. We take this step for the safety of everyone who enjoys and participates in the Stroll: our festival guests, the performers, and off-Solano vendors, the on-Solano Avenue businesses, their staff, the staff of the cities of Albany and Berkeley, the staff of the Police and Fire Departments that are crucial to the event; and many, many more people involved in the production of the Solano Avenue Stroll. The worldwide pandemic has proven to be a perfect storm of calamity that makes it impossible to safely hold large events while devastating the businesses our event is designed to help. We recognize the loss of human life that has resulted from this pandemic and are trying to do everything we can to avoid contributing to the spread of this infectious disease. We are hopeful for a 2021 Solano Avenue Stroll (September 12th) We would like to use this opportunity to remind you that Solano Avenue is mostly open and ready to serve you.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Know the County of Alameda
    Presented by Carol S Orth, CPA Division Chief, Tax Analysis Unit Tax Manager’s Subcommittee Meeting February, 2016 Seventh most populous county in California Fourth most racially diverse county in the United States Land area of 739 square miles and population of 2,043 per square mile Water area is 84 square miles Total area is 823 square miles 2015-16 Total assessed value net other exemptions - $237,563 million Total parcel count - 498,559 Total initial tax charge for 2015-16 - $3.4 billion (includes AV and fixed charges) Budget of over $2.7 billion 2015-16 Top Ten Taxpayers by Assessed Value 1. Pacific Gas and Electric 2. Tesla Motors, Inc 3. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals 4. Digital 720, 2nd LLC 5. Russell City Energy Company 6. AT&T 7. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, INC 8. 5616 Bay Street Investors LLC 9. PSB Northern California Industrial Portfolio LLC 10. Bayer Healthcare LLC Borders the San Francisco Bay on the west with San Francisco and San Mateo Counties, crest of the Berkeley Hills forms northeastern border with Contra Costa County, southern border with Santa Clara County, eastern border with San Joaquin County and southeastern border with Stanislaus County Hayward Fault, a major branch of the San Andreas Fault to the west, runs through the most populated areas of Alameda County and the Calaveras Fault runs through the southeastern part of the county. On March 25, 1853, an Act of Incorporation was created and Alameda County was "born". Created from parts of Contra Costa and Santa Clara Counties, the act was signed into law by Governor Bigler on April 6, 1853.
    [Show full text]
  • Licensed Store Store Name and Location State
    ALASKA LICENSED STORE STORE NAME AND LOCATION STATE AAFES 70386 - AAFES @ FORT WAINWRIGHT AK AAFES 75323 - AAFES @ ELMENDORF AFB AK AAFES 75471 - AAFES @ FT RICHARDSON FRONTIER AK BARANOF WESTMARK HOTEL 22704 BARANOF WESTMARK HOTEL AK FRED MEYER 72709 - FRED MEYER 485 @ FAIRBANKS AK FRED MEYER 72727 - FRED MEYER 656 @ ABBOTT AK FRED MEYER 72772 - FRED MEYER 668 @ EAGLE RIVER AK FRED MEYER 72773 - FRED MEYER 653 @ WASILLA AK FRED MEYER 72784 - FRED MEYER 71 @ DIMOND AK FRED MEYER 72788 - FRED MEYER 11 @ NORTHERN LIGHT AK FRED MEYER 72946 - FRED MEYER 17 @ SOLDOTNA AK FRED MEYER 72975 - FRED MEYER 224 @ FAIRBANKS AK FRED MEYER 72980 - FRED MEYER 671 @ PALMER AK FRED MEYER 79324 - FRED MEYER 158 @ JUNEAU AK FRED MEYER Fred Meyer-Anchorage East #18 AK HMS HOST 75697 - HMS HOST @ ANC 75697 AK HMS HOST 75988 - HMS HOST @ ANC 75988 AK SAFEWAY 12449 - SAFEWAY 1813 @ ANCHORAGE AK SAFEWAY 15313 - SAFEWAY 1739 @ PALMER AK SAFEWAY 3513 - SAFEWAY 1809 @ ANCHORAGE DEBARR RD AK SAFEWAY 4146 - SAFEWAY 1811 @ WAILLA AK SAFEWAY 74265 - SAFEWAY 1807 @ ALASKA EAGLE AK SAFEWAY 74266 - SAFEWAY 1817 @ MULDOON AK SAFEWAY 74283 - SAFEWAY 1820 JUNEAU AK SAFEWAY 74352 - SAFEWAY 2628 @ ABBOTT LOOP AK SAFEWAY 74430 - SAFEWAY 1805 @ AURORA AK SAFEWAY 74452 - SAFEWAY 3410 @ FAIRBANKS AK SAFEWAY 74474 - SAFEWAY 1090 @ KODIAK AK SAFEWAY 74640 - SAFEWAY 1818 @ KETCHIKAN AK SAFEWAY 74695 - SAFEWAY 548 @ SOLDOTNA AK SAFEWAY 74706 - SAFEWAY 2728 @ SEWARD AK SAFEWAY 74917 - SAFEWAY 1832 @ HOMER AK SAFEWAY 79549 - SAFEWAY 520 @ ANCHORAGE AK SAFEWAY 79664 - SAFEWAY 1812 @ ANCHORAGE
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Projects in Each EIR Alternative Fix.Xlsx
    Appendix C Plan Bay Area Final List of Transporation Projects/Programs by County (As of July 27, 2012) Alt 4: Alt 2: Jobs- Alt 3: Transit Total Project Committed Discretionary Alt 1: No Enhanced RTP ID County Public Title Housing Priority Alt 5: EEJ Cost Funds Funds Project Network of Connection Focus Communities Transportation for Livable Communitites (TLC) Bay Area Program - Priority Development Area (PDA) 21011 Region/Multi- $ 100 $ - $ 100 N YY Y Y Planning Grants: provide planning funds to County support transit-oriented development in PDAs Bay Area 21012 Region/Multi- Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit $ 700 $ 700 $ - YYY Y Y County Bay Area State-Owned Toll Bridge 21013 Region/Multi- $ 1,620 $ 1,620 $ - YYY Y Y Rehabilitation/Replacement/Retrofit County Small transit operators in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Solano and Sonoma counties - Bay Area transit operating and capital improvement 21017 Region/Multi- program (including replacement, rehabilitation $ 8,470 $ 7,534 $ 935 N YY Y Y County and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include system expansion) Golden Gate Bridge Moveable Median Barrier: Bay Area installation of a moveable median barrier on the 21320 Region/Multi- $ 25 $ 25 $ - YYY Y Y Golden Gate Bridge to provide a physical County separation between opposing directions of traffic Bay Area Implement Transbay Transit Center/Caltrain 21342 Region/Multi- Downtown Extension (Phase 1 - Transbay Transit $ 1,589 $ 1,589 $ - YYY Y Y County Center) Caltrain
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Solano Avenue Complete Streets and Corridor Revitalization Plan
    Draft Solano Avenue Complete Streets and Corridor Revitalization Plan – 1 Acknowledgements Community Advisory Group Carissa Lee, AC Transit Kathryn Vo, AC Transit Albany City Council Britt Tanner, Albany Strollers & Rollers Mayor Rochelle Nason Amy Smolens, Albany Strollers & Rollers Vice Mayor Peggy McQuaid Ann Cupulo Freeman Michael Barnes Beth Thomas, City of Berkeley Peter Maass Carly Dennett, Flowerland Nick Pilch Carrie Schulze, Flowerland Allen Cain, Solano Avenue Association Albany Traffic & Safety Commission Jennifer Hansen-Romero, Solano Avenue Association Harry Chomsky Robert Del Rosario Project Team Farid Javendal Preston Jordan Toole Design Ken McCroskey Brooke DuBose, AICP Amy Paulsen Megan Wooley-Ousdahl, AICP Susan Reeves Laura Krull Amalia Leighton, PE, AICP Kristen Lohse, ASLA Albany Planning & Zoning Commission Joel Shaffer, EIT Doug Donaldson Erik Giesen-Fields Megan Jennings Opticos Design Chris Kent John Miki Ian MacLeod Cailin Shannon Elizabeth Watty Caroline Swinehart City Staff Local Government Commission Jeff Bond, Community Development Director Josh Meyer Anne Hersch, AICP, Planning Manager and Project Manager Cayla McDonell Justin Fried, Transportation Planner Aleida Andrino-Chavez, Transportation Planner Mark Hurley, Public Work Director Robert Gonzales, Capital Improvements Program Manager Draft Solano Avenue Complete Streets and Corridor Revitalization Plan – 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Sale | Trophy Mixed-Use Building with Parking Garage
    FOR SALE | TROPHY MIXED-USE BUILDING WITH PARKING GARAGE LOCATED IN THE HEART OF THE SOLANO AVE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT CLICK HERE FOR CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT BROCHURE | 1820 Solano Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94707 | 35,185 SF Lockehouse Disclaimer The information contained herein is strictly confidential. It is furnished solely for the purpose of considering the acquisition of the property described herein and is not to be used for any other purpose or made available to any other person without the expressed written consent of Lockehouse Retail Group Inc. (the “Agent”). No representation is made with regard to its accuracy or completeness. Prospective investors should conduct their own investigation and reach their own conclusions without reliance on the material contained herein. Neither the Seller nor the Agent nor any of their respective officers, agents, or principals has made or will make any representations or warranties, expressed or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of the Marketing Package or any of its contents, and no legal commitment or obligation shall arise by reason of the Marketing Package or its contents. Analysis and verification of the information contained in the Marketing Package is solely the responsibility of the prospective purchaser. The Seller and Agent expressly reserve the right, at their sole discretion, to reject any or all expressions of interest or offers to purchase the Property and/or terminate discussions with any entity at any time with or without notice. The Seller shall have no legal commitment or obligations to any entity reviewing the Marketing Package or making an offer to purchase the Property unless and until such offer for the Property is approved by the Seller and any conditions to the Buyer’s obligations thereunder have been satisfied or waived.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Information El Cerrito Plaza Station El Cerrito
    Transit Information For more detailed information about BART service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. El Cerrito Bear Transit San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information eff ective June, 2020 is UC Berkeley’s shuttle Schedule Information eff ective May 2016 Fare Information eff ective February 2015 Transit (BART) rail service connects system, servicing the campus and Check before you go: up-to-date schedules are available on www.bart.gov and the offi cial Plaza Station the San Francisco Peninsula with vicinity. Bear Transit provides The RFS route stops at the El Cerrito Plaza Cash fares can be paid on board. BART app. Overhead real time displays can be found on station platforms. A reference guide Oakland, Berkeley, Berryessa, convenient transportation between BART Station en route from Evans Hall/ to transfer information for trains without direct service is shown. All shuttles are wheelchair accessible. Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and campus, Downtown Berkeley BART, parking Hearst Mining Circle toward the Richmond other cities in the East Bay, as well as San lots, Clark Kerr campus, the Hill area, Field Station on weekday mornings at 6:45. For information on service, please Francisco International Airport (SFO) and residence halls, Richmond Field Station (RFS) The RFS runs year round. call UC Berkeley Parking and El Cerrito Oakland International Airport (OAK). and Campus Shared Services on 4th Street. Transportation at 510-643-7701 or email [email protected]. Trains Without Direct Service Fare Information eff ective June, 2020 One-Way Fares For Train Transfer H, P, C Line .
    [Show full text]