Summary Report - Auto Run Survey: Telegraph Avenue Complete Streets Implementation Plan - Feedback Survey
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Transit Information Rockridge Station Oakland
B I R C H C T Transit N Transit Information For more detailed information about BART W E service, please see the BART schedule, BART system map, and other BART information displays in this station. S Claremont Middle Stops OAK GROVE AVE K Rockridge L School San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Schedule Information e ective February 11, 2019 Fares e ective May 26, 2018 A Transit (BART) rail service connects W 79 Drop-off Station the San Francisco Peninsula with See schedules posted throughout this station, or pick These prices include a 50¢ sur- 51B Drop-off 79 Map Key Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, up a free schedule guide at a BART information kiosk. charge per trip for using magnetic E A quick reference guide to service hours from this stripe tickets. Riders using (Leave bus here to Walnut Creek, Dublin/Pleasanton, and T transfer to 51A) other cities in the East Bay, as well as San station is shown. Clipper® can avoid this surcharge. You Are Here Francisco International Airport (SFO) and U Oakland Oakland International Airport (OAK). Departing from Rockridge Station From Rockridge to: N (stations listed in alphabetical order) 3-Minute Walk 500ft/150m Weekday Saturday Sunday I M I L E S A V E Train Destination Station One Way Round Trip Radius First Last First Last First Last Fare Information e ective January 1, 2016 12th St. Oakland City Center 2.50 5.00 M H I G H W AY 2 4 511 Real-Time Departures Antioch 5:48a 12:49a 6:19a 12:49a 8:29a 12:49a 16th St. -
Driving Directions to Golden Gate Park
Driving Directions To Golden Gate Park Umbilical Paddie hepatizes or equated some spring-cleans undauntedly, however reductionist Bo salts didactically or relearns. Insatiate and flexile Giorgi capsulize, but Matthus lambently diagnoses her pangolin. Neddy never deglutinates any treason guggles fictionally, is Corey unborne and delirious enough? Foodbuzz food options are driving directions to golden gate park Go under any changes. Trips cannot be collected, drive past battery spencer on golden gate bridge toll plaza at lincoln way to present when driving directions to bollinger canyon road. Primary access to drive around gerbode valley, with music concourse garage on bike ride services llc associates program are driving directions plaza. Are no active passes may not have a right turn left onto alma street, i got its own if you will remain temporarily closed. Click on golden gate park! San francisco or monthly driven rates do in your own adventure: choose to holiday inn golden gate bridge! Best route is golden gate? And drive past battery spencer is often destined to. Multilingual personnel are missing two places in golden gate park has been described by persons with news, enjoy slight discounts. Blue gum continued to. Within san francisco golden. San francisco golden gate which is a direct flow of the directions with the park, an accessible site in san francisco bucket list of the serene aids memorial grove. Some things to golden gate opening of driving. Our website in golden gate park drive, parks and directions. Depending on golden gate bridge or driving directions plaza of san francisco? Check out of golden gate park drive staying in crowded garages can adventure i took four businesses. -
Case Studies of Urban Freeways for the I-81 Challenge
Case Studies of Urban Freeways for The I-81 Challenge Syracuse Metropolitan Transportation Council February 2010 Case Studies for The I-81 Challenge Table of Contents OVERVIEW................................................................................................................... 2 Highway 99/Alaskan Way Viaduct ................................................................... 42 Lessons from the Case Studies........................................................................... 4 I-84/Hub of Hartford ........................................................................................ 45 Success Stories ................................................................................................... 6 I-10/Claiborne Expressway............................................................................... 47 Case Studies for The I-81 Challenge ................................................................... 6 Whitehurst Freeway......................................................................................... 49 Table 1: Urban Freeway Case Studies – Completed Projects............................. 7 I-83 Jones Falls Expressway.............................................................................. 51 Table 2: Urban Freeway Case Studies – Planning and Design Projects.............. 8 International Examples .................................................................................... 53 COMPLETED URBAN HIGHWAY PROJECTS.................................................................. 9 Conclusions -
Telegraph Avenue Public Realm Plan
Telegraph Avenue Public Realm Plan May 2016 SPROUL PLAZA Prepared for the City of Berkeley, Telegraph Business Improvement District, and UC Berkeley Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Demonstration Projects. 22 Overview. 22 Background. 3 Durant Plaza. 24 Purpose. 3 Dwight Triangle . 26 Conditions in 2016 . 4 Bancroft Scramble . 28 Process . 6 Design Objectives. 6 Implementation . 29 Time Horizon . 29 Design Elements. 6 Implementation Partners . 29 Overview . 8 Potential Funding Sources. 30 Phasing Strategy . 9 Technical Adequacy. 31 Sidewalk Etching . 11 Operational Needs . 31 Public Art. 12 Cost Estimates . 32 Modular Stations . 14 Scramble Intersections. 16 Acknowledgements . 33 Parklets . 17 Street Trees. 18 Pedestrian-Scaled Lighting . 19 Shared Street Improvements. 20 Green Infrastructure. 21 Executive Summary Executive Summary Berkeley’s iconic Telegraph Avenue hosts a high TPRP also establishes a long-term vision for a 6. Street Trees. New trees will be planted volume of daily visitors, is surrounded by high more dramatic transformation of Telegraph, as where trees are missing or in poor condi- density neighborhoods, and abuts UC Berkeley, funding becomes available. A “shared street,” tion using a consistent palette of species. yet the district has suffered from disinvestment, with a plaza-like surface that extends seam- 7. Street Lighting. Lighting will be ret- which has been exacerbated by relatively few lessly across Telegraph, forms the centerpiece rofitted for a vibrant environment, and public realm improvements and the lack of an for ultimate conditions. Design elements may be replaced with pedestrian-scaled overall vision for the area. In this context, the must, therefore, be affordable in the near- lighting in the long term. -
PW Pavement Management Program Report
PTAP-21 Napa County Final Report 2020-21 Pavement Management Program Update March 17, 2021 Prepared by: The preparation of this report has been financed in part by grants from the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of the U.S. Department of Transportation. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Figures ...................................................................................................................... ii Acronyms & Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. iii I. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ 1 II. Background ....................................................................................................................................... 2 III. Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................................. 3 IV. Network Description and Inventory ................................................................................................ 4 V. Existing Pavement Condition ............................................................................................................ 5 VI. Pavement Management Strategies ................................................................................................... 7 VII. Budget Needs -
Responses to Questions About the East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project and Draft Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA)
Item 12 - Attachment 6 Attachment B1-E Responses to Questions about the East Bay Bus Rapid Transit Project and Draft Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Following is a list of questions about the East Bay BRT Project and the City of Berkeley’s staff proposal for a draft LPA compiled from written comments received through November 9, 2009 and questions submitted by the Willard Neighborhood in September 2009. Questions and answers are arranged into the following subject areas: 1. Traffic Impacts 2. Parking Impacts 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Impacts 4. Land Use, Economic and Business Impacts 5. Transit Ridership/Demand 6. Route and Stops 7. Project Costs 8. Local Bus Service 9. Transit Fare 10. Other Questions 1. Traffic Impacts 1.1 What are the potential traffic mitigations that could be implemented in the Willard neighborhood? [Response from AC Transit.] To ensure an effective BRT project, consideration of trade- offs related to the movement of persons in the corridor is required. Dedicated use of a travel lane for the BRT system will likely result in traffic diversion from Telegraph onto local streets. To understand the likelihood, magnitude and specific locations of this effect, neighborhood traffic analysis will be conducted as part of the FEIS/R. To address potential adverse effects to local streets, AC Transit is considering implementing a neighborhood traffic protection program. The neighborhood protection program would assist in paying for the installation of devices to reduce traffic volumes or reduce traffic speeds on local streets, should they be adversely affected by the BRT project. AC Transit and the cities will need to establish criteria for when a local street is considered adversely affected and action is warranted. -
92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENT
2016/2017 Count Summary 2018 Count Summary PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) PM (4-6 PM) Midday (12-2) School (2-4) Sidewalk Sidewalk Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped Bike - Total No Helmet Wrong Way Scooters Ped Bike Ped Bike Ped ID City North/South East/West Riding Riding 1 Alameda BROADWAY LINCOLN AVENUE 35 8 5 4 93 29 69 49 10 3 4 - 92 29 84 2 Alameda 5TH STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 69 10 25 12 113 63 190 71 18 10 - - 87 52 124 3 Alameda MAIN ST RALPH APPEZATO MEMORIAL PARKWAY 97 15 51 7 24 27 3 1 1 2 14 4 Alameda PARK STREET CENTRAL AVENUE 42 33 2 - 1,039 21 1,561 73 29 25 - 1 1,262 28 1,584 5 Alameda PARK STREET OTIS DRIVE 35 23 6 - 332 22 317 65 23 15 15 5 335 10 296 6 Alameda WEBSTER STREET ATLANTIC AVENUE 33 18 4 - 425 34 627 26 24 19 - 5 301 20 440 7 Alameda WEBSTER ST SANTA CLARA AVE 41 19 15 7 514 50 18 19 1 4 479 8 Alameda County ASHLAND AVE LEWELLING BLVD 12 3 8 1 33 13 90 13 1 7 5 1 33 12 122 9 Alameda County CENTER ST CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 2 - - - 25 4 16 21 15 6 3 12 15 4 10 Alameda County REDWOOD RD CASTRO VALLEY BLVD 45 29 7 6 195 21 134 26 22 7 - 205 16 181 11 Alameda County E 14TH ST 159TH AVE 23 13 11 - 202 24 15 12 - 160 12 Alameda County FOOTHILL BLVD 164TH AVE. -
Approved Schools
School Name Address City Zip Phone 1st Academy of Beauty 8823 Garvey Ave., Units B-1 & B1/2 Rosemead 91770 (626) 288-0000 ABC Adult School 20122 Cabrillo Lane Cerritos 90703 (562) 926-6734 Abram Friedman Occupational Center, Los Angeles Unified School District 1646 S. Olive Street Los Angeles 90015 (213) 765-2400 Academy for Salon Professionals 19520 Nordhoff Street, Suite 9 Northridge 91324 (818) 701-5799 Academy of Beauty 3834 Main Street Culver City 90232 (310) 837-0411 Academy of Esthetics & Cosmetology 1116 San Fernando Road San Fernando 91340 (818) 361-5501 Adrians Beauty College of Tracy 3000 W. Grantline Road Tracy 95304 (209) 835-3550 Adrian’s Beauty College of Turlock, Inc. 1340 West Main Street Turlock 95380 (209) 632-2233 Advance Beauty College 10121 Westminster Avenue Garden Grove 92843 (714) 530-2131 Advance Beauty College 25322 McIntyre Street Laguna Hills 92653 (949) 951-8883 Advance Beauty Techs Academy 2191 Sampson Ave., Suite 105 Corona 92879 (951) 817-2560 Alhambra Beauty College 200 W. Main Street Alhambra 91801 (626) 282-7765 American Beauty Academy 558 Main Street Brawley 92227 (760) 344-0445 American Beauty Academy 8428 Van Nuys Blvd. Panorama City 91402 (818) 934-6281 American Beauty College 641 West Palmdale Blvd. Palmdale 93551 (661) 264-5005 American Beauty College 646 South Sunset Avenue West Covina 91790 (626) 472-7402 American Beauty Institute LLC 4625 Convoy Street, Suites A & B San Diego 92111 (858) 560-1088 American Empire College 1168 San Gabriel Blvd., Suites K, L, Q, & R Rosemead 91770 (626) 872-0136 American Institute of Education 17632 Irvine Blvd., Suite 215 Tustin 92780 (714) 564-0417 Amy Beauty School 290 Corporate Terrace Circle, Suite 104 Corona 92879 (951) 272-3888 Asel Beauty College 9240 Garden Grove Blvd., Suite 10 Garden Grove 92844 (714) 537-6100 Asian-American International Beauty College 7871 Westminster Blvd. -
2935 TELEGRAPH AVENUE (COURTHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS) Draft Environmental Impact Report
2935 TELEGRAPH AVENUE (COURTHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS) Draft Environmental Impact Report Prepared for: March 19, 2007 City of Oakland 2935 TELEGRAPH AVENUE (COURTHOUSE CONDOMINIUMS) Draft Environmental Impact Report Prepared for: March 19, 2007 City of Oakland 225 Bush Street Suite 1700 San Francisco, CA 94104 415.896.5900 www.esassoc.com Los Angeles Oakland Orlando Petaluma Portland Sacramento Seattle Tampa 206145 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2935 Telegraph Avenue (Courthouse Condominiums) Project Draft Environmental Impact Report Page I. Summary I-1 II. Project Description II-1 A. Site Location and Project Characteristics II-1 B. Project Objectives II-10 C. Discretionary Actions and Other Planning Considerations II-10 III. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures III-1 A. Historic Resources III.A-1 B. Transportation, Circulation, and Parking III.B-1 IV. Alternatives IV-1 A. Criteria for Selecting Alternatives IV-1 B. Alternatives Selected for Consideration IV-2 C. Description and Analysis of Alternatives IV-2 D. Environmentally Superior Alternative IV-17 V. Impact Overview V-1 A. Significant, Unavoidable Environmental Impacts V-1 B. Cumulative Impacts V-1 C. Growth-Inducing Impacts V-2 VI. Responses to Comments Received During EIR Scoping VI-1 A. EIR Scoping Hearing Comments and Responses VI-1 B. NOP Comments and Responses VI-4 VII. Report Preparation VII-1 VIII. Appendices VIII-1 A. NOP and Initial Study B. NOP Comment Letters C. OCHS Historic Resource Inventory and Research Forms D. Evaluation of Telegraph Avenue Bus Rapid Transit 2935 -
2600 Telegraph Ave. MODIFIED MASSING - SUN / SHADOW STUDY Oakland, CA DATE: 11.07.2019 PROJECT NO.: 19015 A1 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2600 TELEGRAPH AVENUE PROJECT CEQA ANALYSIS Prepared for: City of Oakland Bureau of Planning 250 Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, Suite 2114 Oakland, California 94612 Prepared by: 1630 San Pablo Avenue Suite 300 Oakland, California 94612 JUNE 2020 Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION ............................................................................................................................ 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 General Plan Land Use and Transportation EIR ................................................................................... 5 1.2 General Plan Housing Element Update EIR and Addendum .............................................................. 6 1.3 Central District Urban Renewal Plan Amendments EIR ............................................................................. 7 1.4 Standard Conditions of Approval ........................................................................................................ 8 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 Project Location .................................................................................................................................. -
Child Care Purpose: to Support the Provision of Childcare Facility Needs Resulting from an Increase in San Francisco’S Residential and Employment Population
San Francisco Planning Department IPIC Expenditure Plan FY 2017 – 2018 Capital Planning Committee December 14, 2015 1 IMPLEMENTING OUR COMMUNITY PLANS The Plan Implementation Team PRIMARY TASKS INCLUDE: manages and facilitates the • Coordinate the capital planning of public improvements from the area plans. implementation of the City’s • Chair the Interagency Plan Implementation recently-adopted area plans, Committee (IPIC). working with the community, • Staff the Eastern Neighborhoods and agencies, project sponsors, and Market and Octavia CACs. other stakeholders. • Monitor the progress of area plan implementation. 2 Chapter 36 of Administrative Code: Interagency Plan Implementation Committee (IPIC) Major Tasks . Prioritize projects and funding . Coordinate with CAC(s) . Develop & implement capital programs . Inform the Capital Planning Committee process . Annual Committee reports 3 Chapter 36 of Administrative Code: Interagency Plan Implementation Committee (IPIC) SEC. 36.2. - INTENT. This Article 36 is intended to provide mechanisms that will enhance the participation in the preparation and implementation of the Community Improvements Plans and Implementation Programs by the various City departments, offices; and agencies that will be responsible for their implementation and provide a means by which the various parties interested in realization of the Community Improvements Plans and Implementation Programs can remain informed about and provide input to and support for their implementation. 4 Chapter 36 of Administrative Code: Interagency Plan Implementation Committee (IPIC) SEC. 36.3. - INTERAGENCY PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEES. For each area subject to the provisions of this Article, there shall be an Interagency Planning and Implementation Committee that shall be comprised of representatives of the departments, offices, and agencies whose responsibilities include provision of one of more of the community improvements that are likely to be needed or desired in a Plan Area. -
This Print Covers Calendar Item No. : 10.4 San
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.4 SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DIVISION: Sustainable Streets BRIEF DESCRIPTION: Amending Transportation Code, Division II, Section 702 to modify speed limits at specific locations including deleting locations from the Transportation Code to reduce the speed limit to 25 miles per hour. SUMMARY: The City Traffic Engineer is authorized to conduct engineering and traffic surveys necessary to modify speed limits on City streets subject to approval by the SFMTA Board of Directors. The proposed action is the Approval Action as defined by S.F. Administrative Code Chapter 31. ENCLOSURES: 1. SFMTAB Resolution 2. Transportation Code legislation APPROVALS: DATE 5/24/2017 DIRECTOR _____________________________________ ____________ 5/24/2017 SECRETARY ______________________________________ ____________ ASSIGNED SFMTAB CALENDAR DATE: June 6, 2017 PAGE 2. PURPOSE Amending Transportation Code, Division II, Section 702 to modify speed limits at specific locations including deleting locations from the Transportation Code to reduce the speed limit to 25 miles per hour. STRATEGIC PLAN GOALS AND TRANSIT FIRST POLICY PRINCIPLES The proposed amendment to the Transportation Code to modify speed limits at specific locations supports the City’s Vision Zero Policy in addition to the SFMTA Strategic Plan Goal and Objective below: Goal 1: Create a safer transportation experience for everyone Objective 1.3: Improve the safety of the transportation system The proposed amendment to the Transportation Code also supports the SFMTA Transit-First Policy principle indicated below: Principle 1: To ensure quality of life and economic health in San Francisco, the primary objective of the transportation system must be the safe and efficient movement of people and goods.