Making București a Growth Pole?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Making București a Growth Pole? Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized i ii This report was prepared by a core team comprised of Marcel Ionescu-Heroiu, Marina Neagu, Sebastian Burduja, Dumitru Sandu, Ciprian Moldovan, Titus Man, and Raularian Rusu. The report benefited from thoughtful comments by peer reviewers Guido Licciardi, Toshiaki Keicho, and Ramona Bere. The team would like to thank the counterparts in the Ministry of Regional Development and Public Administration, for the timely feed-back, the support offered in the elaboration of this study, and the excellent collaboration throughout. We would also like to extend our gratitude to the growth pole coordinators for the feed-back provided, and the regional development agencies for assisting with field visits and data collection. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the Executive Directors of the World Bank, the European Union, or the Government of Romania. December 20th, 2013 i Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ..................................................................................................... vi Executive Summary ......................................................................................... vii Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 PART I – Setting Out the Context ....................................................................... 2 The First Growth Poles Policy ............................................................................. 2 Policy Impact – Are Growth Poles Really Growing? ........................................... 6 A New Urban Systems Approach for Romania ................................................. 10 The EC’s Perspective and Policies on Urban Growth Poles ............................... 14 Framing the Growth Poles Policy within the framework of the Europe 2020 Strategy ............................................................................................................. 15 Approaches to Regional Development ............................................................. 16 EU definitions of cities and surrounding areas ................................................. 18 The Challenge of Institutional Frameworks ...................................................... 25 Correlation with Other Sectoral and Spatial Policies ........................................ 34 Should the Growth Poles Policy be Continued ................................................. 41 PART II – Recommendations for the Growth Poles Policy for the 2014-2020 Programming Period ........................................................................................ 43 A different kind of balancing act ....................................................................... 44 From regions and cities to people .................................................................... 49 More meaningful growth pole functional areas ............................................... 52 Not all growth poles are created equal ............................................................ 57 From Growth Poles to Growth Areas ................................................................ 62 Truly integrated programs ................................................................................ 64 Increase synergies with economic development policies ................................. 65 How many growth poles for the 2014-2020 Programming Period? ................. 67 Learning from the București Growth Pole ........................................................ 76 Making București a growth pole? ..................................................................... 78 What type of growth pole investments for 2014-2020? .................................. 79 Proper monitoring and evaluation of the Growth Poles Policy ........................ 81 Designing sustainable institutional frameworks for growth pole governance . 85 Alternative institutional solutions to IDAs ........................................................ 87 PART III - Recommendations for individual growth poles ................................ 89 Braşov ............................................................................................................. 101 Regional Infrastructure ............................................................................... 101 Business Environment ................................................................................. 104 Spatial Planning........................................................................................... 113 Cluj-Napoca ..................................................................................................... 119 Regional Infrastructure ............................................................................... 119 ii Business Environment ................................................................................. 122 Spatial Planning........................................................................................... 131 Constanţa ........................................................................................................ 135 Regional Infrastructure ............................................................................... 135 Business Environment ................................................................................. 138 Spatial Planning........................................................................................... 145 Craiova ............................................................................................................ 149 Regional Infrastructure ............................................................................... 149 Business Environment ................................................................................. 151 Spatial Planning........................................................................................... 158 Iaşi ................................................................................................................... 161 Regional Infrastructure ............................................................................... 161 Business Environment ................................................................................. 164 Spatial Planning........................................................................................... 171 Ploieşti ............................................................................................................ 175 Regional Infrastructure ............................................................................... 175 Business Environment ................................................................................. 178 Spatial Planning........................................................................................... 184 Timişoara ........................................................................................................ 189 Regional Infrastructure ............................................................................... 189 Business Environment ................................................................................. 192 Spatial Planning........................................................................................... 198 Annexes ......................................................................................................... 203 Annex 1 - Evolution of demographic size ........................................................ 203 Annex 2 - Evolution of built up areas .............................................................. 207 Annex 3 - Attributions of the growth pole coordinator .................................. 210 Annex 4 - Situation of IDP projects in implementation with funds from ROP (as of Feb. 2013) ................................................................................................... 211 Annex 5 - Methodology for calculating the connectivity index (RD) .............. 212 Annex 6 – Driving access areas by locality for each individual growth pole ... 214 Annex 7 – The Local Human Development Index (LHDI) methodology ......... 222 References ..................................................................................................... 224 iii List of Figures Figure 1. Growth Poles and Urban Development ................................................... 5 Figure 2. Evolution of firm revenues in growth pole areas ..................................... 8 Figure 3. How to define a city (Graz) and a commuting zone (Genova) ............... 19 Figure 4.Degree of polycentricity in national urban systems ................................ 20 Figure 5.MEGA typology and the core “pentagon” growth area .......................... 21 Figure 6.PUSH areas (left) and PIAs (right) ............................................................ 22 Figure 7.Share of growth in total GDP (%), 2000-2007 ......................................... 24 Figure 8. Governance structure of growth poles .................................................. 28 Figure 9.Potential functional areas are larger than the currently defined metropolitan areas ................................................................................................ 53 Figure 10. Population within a one hour train ride to growth poles ..................... 55 Figure 11. At this
Recommended publications
  • Bid-Book Brasov 2021 - European Capital of Culture Brasov 2021 Team
    MUNICIPALITY OF BRASOV Bid-Book Brasov 2021 - European Capital of Culture Brasov 2021 Team: Project coordinator: DRAGOS DAVID Concept, vision & artistic strategy: NICOLAE PEPENE The team: NICOLAE PEPENE RADU COLȚ SORIN GANEA GABRIELA BRAȘOVEANU MEDEEA KATERINA PETROVAN Design & editing: INOVATIV MEDIA Translations: Eran Catt Photo credits: Agenția Metropolitană Brașov Primăria Municipiului Brașov Revista ASTRA Nicolae Pepene Asociația Carpaterra / Mihail Iacomir Biblioteca Județeană G. Barițiu Brașov Emi Cristea Victor Ștefănescu Inovativ Media Municipality of Brasov Bid-Book Brasov 2021 - European Capital of Culture In Brasov County, not afar from the old medieval road between Brasov and Sighisoara, at Mercheasa (in the commune named Homorod), 60 km from the city of Brasov, stands ”The Elder of the Carpathians“, a mountain oak (sessile), whose age is twice that of the two prominent historic towns of Romania’s past. Brasov’s historic coat of arms is a royal crown placed on the cut trunk of amountain oak (sessile) extended in 13 strong roots. Ever since the Middle Ages, throughout Europe, the oak symbolizes solidity, strength, longevity and height, both in the spiritual and in the material sense. It has always and everywhere represented both moral and physical strength. Also, through its crown, the oak is a symbol of hospitality and it represented the equivalent of a temple in the European art. It is the oak that the people of Brasov have chosen in 2015 as a symbol to define the past, present and near future of the city they inhabit. 3 Introduction – General considerations Brasov has chosen to grow through culture! The city located on the border lined by the The first documentary attestation Carpathian Mountains on the border of the kingdom, of Brasov happened in 1235, empire or principality, protected its riches behind strong fortifications, erected upon the urge of King Sigismund under the name of Corona.
    [Show full text]
  • Studiu Demografic Ghimbav
    STUDIU PRIVIND EVOLUŢIA DEMOGRAFICĂ A ORASULUI GHIMBAV ÎN PERIOADA 1994-2014 STUDIU PRIVIND EVOLUŢIA DEMOGRAFICĂ A ORAȘULUI GHIMBAV ÎN PERIOADA 1994-2014 BENEFICIAR: PRIMĂRIA ORAŞULUI GHIMBAV EXECUTANT: Asociația AIDA Brașov - 2015 - Page | 1 CUPRINS Capitolul 1 - DATE GENERALE ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Metologia studiului ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Tipuri de date; sursa datelor; ani de referinţă ............................................................................................... 4 1.3. Structura studiului ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Capitolul 2 - POPULAŢIA. ELEMENTE DEMOGRAFICE ŞI SOCIALE .......................................................... 5 2.1. Numărul locuitorilor şi evoluţia populaţiei orasului Ghimbav .................................................................... 6 2.2. Densitatea populaţiei .................................................................................................................................... 8 2.3. Structura demografică pe sexe. .................................................................................................................... 9 2.4. Structura pe grupe de vârstă ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strategy for Local Sustainable Development of the City of Codlea 2011-2020
    Innovation in administration EUROPEAN UNION GOVERNMENT OF ROMANIA European Social Fund Operational programme Ministry of Administration and "Administrative Capacity Interior Development" STRATEGY FOR LOCAL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF CODLEA 2011-2020 -SUMMARY- Territorial and Administrative Unit “City of Codlea” 1 During 15 months the City of Codlea carried out the project called “Update of strategy for local sustainable development of the locality of Codlea”. The project was co-financed from the EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND through the Operational programme for Administrative Capacity Development 2007-2013, project SMIS code 12802. By implementing the project, several results were obtained, the most important being the document “Strategy for local sustainable development of the municipality of Codlea”, as approved by the Codlea Local Council. Other results: 4 specialty studies (economic, social, technical–economic and environmental studies) which ensured the grounding of municipality’s development strategy; SWOT analysis; Codlea Town Hall staff trained in the fields of strategic planning, sustainable development and equal opportunities; Specific software for strategy management and implementation within the territorial and administrative unit of the municipality of Codlea – results monitoring; People informed about the content of strategy – document published on the institution’s website. Part II STRATEGY OF DEVELOPMENT Chapter I. Vision of development The main approach within the update process of strategy for sustainable development of the City of Codlea was the intercommunity one. The city of Codlea is a part of the Brasov Metropolitan Area, alongside the cities of Brasov, Săcele, Râşnov, Predeal, Ghimbav, the localities of Sânpetru, Bod, Hălchiu, Prejmer, Tărlungeni, Cristian, Vulcan, Hărman, Feldioara and Crizbav.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Landscape Planning to Mitigate Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions
    land Article Sustainable Landscape Planning to Mitigate Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions Ancuta Fedorca 1,2,† , Mihai Fedorca 1,2,†, Ovidiu Ionescu 1,2, Ramon Jurj 1, Georgeta Ionescu 1 and Marius Popa 1,2,* 1 Wildlife Department, National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry Marin Dracea, 077190 Voluntari, Romania; [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (O.I.); [email protected] (R.J.); [email protected] (G.I.) 2 Silviculture Department, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Bras, ov, 500036 Bras, ov, Romania * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +40-742-120-175 † Ancuta Fedorca and Mihai Fedorca are equally contributing authors. Abstract: Road development, traffic intensification, and collisions with wildlife represent a danger both for road safety and species conservation. For planners, deciding which mitigation methods to apply is often problematic. Through a kernel density estimate, we analyzed 715 crossing locations and wildlife–vehicle collisions (WVCs) involving brown bears, lynx, wolf, red deer, roe deer, and wild boar in the Southeastern Carpathian Mountains. We identified 25 WVC hotspots, of which eight require urgent mitigation of existing infrastructure. Moreover, many of these hotspots are in Natura 2000 sites, along road sections where vegetation is in close proximity, animal movement is the highest, and driver visibility is low. Our study is the first in Romania to recommend practical solutions to remediate WVC hotspots and benefit sustainable landscape management. Citation: Fedorca, A.; Fedorca, M.; Ionescu, O.; Jurj, R.; Ionescu, G.; Popa, Keywords: traffic; wildlife–vehicle collisions; infrastructure; safety M. Sustainable Landscape Planning to Mitigate Wildlife–Vehicle Collisions.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-09-15 163225
    39DILúDUHMXGHĠ Proces-verbal din data de 15.09.2020SULYLQGGHVHPQDUHDSUHúHGLQĠLORUELURXULORUHOHFWRUDOHDOHVHFĠLLORUGHYRWDUH FRQVWLWXLWHSHQWUXDOHJHUHDDXWRULWă܊LORUDGPLQLVWUD܊LHLSXEOLFHORFDOHGLQGDWDGH27 septembrie 2020úLDORFĠLLWRULORUDFHVWRUD %LURXO(OHFWRUDOGH&LUFXPVFULS܊LH-XGHĠHDQăQU8%5$ù29 ,QL܊LDOD Nr. crt. UAT 1U6HF܊LH ,QVWLWX܊LD )XQF܊LD Nume Prenume $GUHVă WDWăOXL ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOă´2YLG -8'(ğ8/%5$ù29081,&,3,8/ 1 081,&,3,8/)Ă*Ă5$ù 204 'HQVXúLDQX´ùFRDOD /RF܊LLWRU MOTOC IULIAN F )Ă*Ă5$ù *HQHUDOăQU &ROHJLXO1DĠLRQDO´5DGX -8'(ğ8/%5$ù29081,&,3,8/ 2 081,&,3,8/)Ă*Ă5$ù 209 1HJUX´ùFRDOD*HQHUDOă /RF܊LLWRU FURDUI MONICA G )Ă*Ă5$ù nr.1 *UăGLQL܊DFX3URJUDP -8'(ğ8/%5$ù29081,&,3,8/ 3 081,&,3,8/)Ă*Ă5$ù 219 3UH܈HGLQWH GREAVU IONELA-ADINA I 3UHOXQJLW$OELQX܊D )Ă*Ă5$ù Liceul George Moroianu -8'(ğ8/%5$ù29081,&,3,8/ 4 081,&,3,8/6Ă&(/( 228 /RF܊LLWRU JINGA ADRIAN-OVIDIU V Corpul C 6Ă&(/( ùFRDOD*LPQD]LDOăQU -8'(ğ8/%5$ù29081,&,3,8/ 5 081,&,3,8/6Ă&(/( 235 3UH܈HGLQWH PIROSKA ÉVA B )UDĠLL3RSHHD 6Ă&(/( 6 25$ù*+,0%$9 243 35,0Ă5,$*+,0%$9 /RF܊LLWRU STOIAN MARIA-SIMONA V -8'(ğ8/%5$ù2925$ù*+,0%$9 &(1758/'(&8/785Ă -8'(ğ8/%5$ù29081,&,3,8/ 7 25$ù35('($/ 247 3UH܈HGLQWH NAGHI DELIA-MARIA A MIHAIL SAULESCU %5$ù29 &(1758/'(&8/785Ă -8'(ğ8/%5$ù29081,&,3,8/ 8 25$ù35('($/ 247 /RF܊LLWRU LUCA MIRELA I MIHAIL SAULESCU %5$ù29 LICEUL TEORETIC 9 25$ù35('($/ 248 3UH܈HGLQWH VELEA EUSEBIU-MIHAIL N -8'(ğ8/%5$ù2925$ù5Æù129 MIHAIL SAULESCU LICEUL TEORETIC 10 25$ù35('($/ 248 /RF܊LLWRU NAN ANDREEA S -8'(ğ8/%5$ù2925$ù5Æù129 MIHAIL SAULESCU LICEUL TEORETIC CONSTANTIN- 11 25$ù35('($/ 249 3UH܈HGLQWH COJOCARU C -8'(ğ8/%5$ù2925$ù5Æù129 0,+$,/6Ă8/(6&8 ALEXANDRU -8'(ğ8/%5$ù2925$ù 12 25$ù9,&725,$ 269 PRIMARIA VICTORIA 3UH܈HGLQWH NICHIFOR DANIELA-AURICA E VICTORIA Colegiul Tehnic Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Action Plan For
    1 MANAGEMENT AND ACTION PLAN FOR THE BEAR POPULATION IN ROMANIA The goal: To maintain, in coexistence with people, viable populations of large carnivores as an integral part of ecosystems and landscapes across Carpathians 2 Table of Contents Introduction...............................................................................................................................5 Part I – The General Overview.................................................................................................8 1. THE PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ...........................................................................................8 2. BACKGROUND FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN ..............................................8 3. LEGAL PROVISIONS CONCERNING BEAR MANAGEMENT .........................................10 3.1. International Legal Provisions ................................................................................10 3.2. National legislation on the protection and conservation of the brown bear (Ursus arctos arctos) .............................................................................................11 3.2.1. Management Plan Elaboration Framework and Public Participation.......13 Part II – The Situation in Romania .........................................................................................14 4. INFORMATION FOR UNDERSTANDING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE PLAN............14 4.1. Bear Status and Distribution ..................................................................................14 4.1.1. Historic and current
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism in the Centre Region, Between Statistical Coordinates and Master Plan Targets
    Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov Series V: Economic Sciences • Vol. 11 (60) No. 2 – 2018 TOURISM IN THE CENTRE REGION, BETWEEN STATISTICAL COORDINATES AND MASTER PLAN TARGETS Kinga KÁDÁR (LÁZÁR)1 Abstract: The Central Region Development Strategy has as its principal objective the balanced development of the Centre Region through economic growth, the utilization of existing natural resources and the protection of the environment. Depending on the proposed objectives, the Centre Region must obtain funds for Regional projects included in the Regional Development Plan. Realising funding of these projects will greatly contribute to achieving the objectives set out in the Europe 2020 strategy. Key words: development strategy, Master Plan, statistical coordinates 1. Introduction Tourism is considered one of the most profitable sectors of economy, which is constantly developing. The tourism industry is the second in world trade, after the oil industry, which is the world's leading employment creation. Tourism has become an important economic activity today, and in many countries it is the main source of income, for example in France, Italy, Switzerland, Spain and Austria, which is doing the "export of tourist services". At the same time, tourism also offers jobs in other fields such as transport, and related activities of accommodation and forms of tourists' service. Tourism is a positive correction factor, which provides a necessary alternation between periods of intense work and active recreation. Passive recreation is less practiced as people are looking for active recreation during holidays: excursions, walks, horseback riding, spa treatments. 2. Tourism Regulation Institutions in Romania Tourism is the activity sector that engages in multiple services and activities in all branches of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Oscillating Between Different Types of Public Contracts Regarding the Construction of a Highway *
    LawOscillating Review between special different issue, Decembre types of public 2019, pp.contracts… 101-112 101 OSCILLATING BETWEEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF PUBLIC CONTRACTS REGARDING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A HIGHWAY * Cătălina Georgeta DINU ** Abstract: The article underlines the difficulties that the public authorities have in choosing the most suitable public contract for the construction of a highway, starting from the identification of the applicable legislation in this matter, both at European and national level. The analysis of examples of good practice in such constructions is also necessary, by evaluating some public contracts already executed at the level of some foreign states. The impasse in which Romania has been for many years for the construction of a highway can be overcome by elaborating an appropriate legislation and applying it correctly. Therefore, the understanding of the specificity of the various contractual categories to which the Romanian state can appeal in order to materialize this old desire to build a highway is essential. The representatives of the central authorities often oscillated between public-private partnership, concession of works and public procurement, although the legislation has changed several times during this time. And the transposition of the European directives in the field seems not to have led to a clear conclusion on the long-term benefits and efficiency of these contracts. The article intends to respond to these concerns that currently grind the aspirations of materialization and completion of the construction of the Brasov-Comarnic highway from Romania. Key words: Public Law, Administrative Law, Public Contracts, public private partnership, concession, public procurement. Introduction The dynamics of investments and of the economy in general, but also the constant legislative changes have led both to the diversification of the categories of public contracts, as well as to a fluctuating interpretation of the specificity of each of these categories – too less the resultant of an in-depth analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • 92 Recreational Activities in Romanian Mountain Tourism
    Ovidius University Annals, Series Physical Education and Sport / SCIENCE, MOVEMENT AND HEALTH Vol. XVIII, ISSUE 1, 2018 Romania The journal is indexed in: Ebsco, SPORTDiscus, INDEX COPERNICUS JOURNAL MASTER LIST, DOAJ DIRECTORY OF OPEN ACCES JOURNALS, Caby, Gale Cengage Learning, Cabell’s Directories Science, Movement and Health, Vol. XVIII, ISSUE 1, 2018 January 2018, 18 (1): 92-96 Original article RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN ROMANIAN MOUNTAIN TOURISM YILMAZ Monica Denise1, TEODOR Dragos Florin2 Abstract Aim. Romania is a country with a very varied and diverse tourism potential and a landscape consists of 27.91% mountains of total country area, with altitudes between 600 – 2500 m, an average height of 840 m and 10% of the country’s territory above 1500 m (Cernaianu et al, 2017). In Romania the winter sports tourism are focused on the skiing activity and ski resorts. There are some 27 licensed ski areas in Romania with around 80 authorized ski slopes, and a variety of ski lifts, gondolas, chair lifts, skid lifts and cable cars with a capacity of over 35,000 persons an hour serving these areas (Romania National Tourism Master Plan 2007 – 2026). There is heavy demand at weekends during the winter when snow conditions are favorable. Sport event tourism is a huge and growing global industry with important economic implications for both the sport, the event and the impact of travel and tourism related benefits on host destinations (Candrea et al, 2010). The most popular winter touristic destinations in Romania are: Poiana Brasov, Predeal, Sinaia. Previous quantitative marketing research outlined that 45% of tourists are entirely satisfied with the quality of the accommodation units in Braşov city and 37.9% of tourists feel the same way about Poiana Braşov (Candrea et al, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Iunie 2018 STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE DURABILĂ 2014-2024 a ORAȘULUI GHIMBAV REACTUALIZARE PENTRU ANUL 2018
    PRIMĂRIA GHIMBAV STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE DURABILĂ 2014-2024 a ORAȘULUI GHIMBAV REACTUALIZARE PENTRU ANUL 2018 Iunie 2018 PROTEUS DIONA S.R.L. BRAȘOV Coordonator: Ing. DUMITRU ION www.proteus.ro Brașov, str.Bisericii S. Nicolae, nr.12 0722 326407; 0723 350 774; 0728 289198 [email protected] STRATEGIA DE DEZVOLTARE DURABILĂ 2014-2024 A ORAȘULUI GHIMBAV - REACTUALIZARE PENTRU ANUL 2018 PREAMBUL Prezenta reactualizare a Strategie de Dezvoltare Durabilă a oraşului Ghimbav (SDD) este concepută şi realizată în concordanţă cu existenţa şi posibilitatea accesării unor fonduri europene nerambursabile, valabile pentru perioada de programare 2014-2020. Acest document programatic este vital pregătirii proiectelor şi pachetelor de proiecte finanțabile din aceste fonduri. Documentul SDD își propune să susțină schimbarea de paradigmă şi dezvoltarea oraşului Ghimbav, prin reactualizarea Strategiei de Dezvoltare Durabilă din 2014, elaborat pentru acesta cu referire la perioada 2014-2024. Scopul strategiei este acela de a crea un instrument operațional, în baza căruia, Consiliu Local Ghimbav în parteneriat cu Consiliul Județean Brașov, Agenția Metropolitană Braşov şi ADR Centru Alba Iulia să își capitalizeze investițiile realizate până în prezent, să-și definească obiectivele şi prioritățile de dezvoltare ale acestui teritoriu pentru perioada 2014-2024 și să le transpună în proiecte strategice, realiste și cât mai uşor de realizat. Documentul supus consultării publice şi aprobării lui, conţine o analiză-diagnostic a situaţiei actuale, însoţită de o trecere
    [Show full text]
  • Județul Brașov Comitetul Județean Pentru Situații De Urgență
    Anexa 1 la Hotărârea nr. 139/18.05.2021 a CJSU Brașov Nr.crt. Unitatea școlară Tip UAT Localitatea Statut Scenariul 1 Școala Gimnazială 'Apaczai Csere Janos' Apața de stat Apața Apața PJ 1 2 Grădinița cu Program Normal Apața de stat Apața Apața structură 1 3 Școala Gimnazială Augustin de stat Augustin Augustin PJ 1 4 Grădinița cu Program Normal Augustin de stat Augustin Augustin structură 1 5 Școala Primară Beclean de stat Beclean Beclean PJ 1 6 Grădinița cu Program Normal Beclean de stat Beclean Beclean structură 1 7 Grădinița cu Program Normal Boholț de stat Beclean Boholț structură 1 8 Școala Primară Boholț de stat Beclean Boholț structură 1 9 Școala Gimnazială Bod de stat Bod Bod PJ 1 10 Grădinița cu Program Normal Bod de stat Bod Bod structură 1 11 Liceul 'Sextil Pușcariu' Bran de stat Bran Bran PJ 2 12 Grădinița cu Program Normal Bran de stat Bran Bran structură 2 13 Grădinița cu Program Normal Poarta de stat Bran Poarta structură 2 14 Școala Primară Poarta de stat Bran Poarta structură 2 15 Grădinița cu Program Normal Predeluț de stat Bran Predeluț structură 2 16 Grădinița cu Program Normal Sohodol de stat Bran Sohodol structură 2 17 Școala Gimnazială Sohodol de stat Bran Sohodol structură 2 18 Grădinița cu Program Normal Șimon de stat Bran Șimon structură 2 19 Școala Gimnazială Șimon de stat Bran Șimon structură 2 20 Centrul Școlar pentru Educație Incluzivă Brașov de stat Brașov Brașov PJ 1 21 Centrul Școlar pentru Educație Incluzivă de Recuperare Hipoacuzici Brașov de stat Brașov Brașov structură 1 22 Grădinița Specială Brașov
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Pressure and Its Influence on Tourists and Tourism Activities in the Prahova Corridor
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE AND ITS INFLUENCE ON TOURISTS AND TOURISM ACTIVITIES IN THE PRAHOVA CORRIDOR HAVRIŞ LOREDANA-ELENA 1 ABSTRACT. Atmospheric pressure and its influence on tourists and tourism activities in the Prahova Corridor. In the climate literature it is known that the atmospheric temperature directly and permanently acts on the all organisms and all geographical environment components, influencing the wellness of the weather sensitive persons and implicitly the wellness of tourists in this region. In the same time, its evolution is a good indicator in shaping the short and medium term meteorological forecast, considering that the region chosen for research is a very tripper one, especially during the winter season when the atmospheric pressure variation trend is much more pronounced. Within this framework, the present paper tries to develop a climatic diagnosis on the reference climate parameters (annual and monthly average pressure values, seasonal values, minimum and maximum absolute values and their emergence probability but also the non-periodic variability) based on data recorded during 1961-2007 at Câmpina, Sinaia 1500, Predeal, Omu Peak and Braşov weather stations. Keywords: Prahova Corridor, atmospheric pressure, tourism, bioclimatology. 1. INTRODUCTION The tourism, as men outdoor activity, it is greatly dependent by the climatic condition and weather. Considering this correlation between the tourism and climatic condition and although the periodic fluctuations of the atmospheric pressure are almost unnoticeable for the human senses, and the geographical consequences are not visible (Stoenescu, 1951), it keep trace of in these paper on detail atmospheric pressure and its influence on tourists (especially on the wellness of the weather sensitive persons) and implicitly on tourism activities.
    [Show full text]