DOCSLIB.ORG

Roles of the Plant Cell Wall in Powdery Mildew Disease

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roles of the Plant Cell Wall in Powdery Mildew Disease Roles of the plant cell wall in powdery mildew disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana: PMR5 (POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANT 5) affects the acetylation of cell wall pectin By Candice Cherk Lim A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Shauna Somerville, Chair Professor Patricia Zambryski Associate Professor Mary Wildermuth Professor James Berger Spring 2013 Abstract Roles of the plant cell wall in powdery mildew disease resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana: PMR5 (POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANT 5) affects the acetylation of cell wall pectin by Candice Cherk Lim Doctor of Philosophy in Plant Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Shauna Somerville, Chair The pmr5 (powdery mildew resistant 5) mutant was found in a screen for genes involved in susceptibility to Golovinomyces cichoracearum, a biotrophic pathogen that infects Arabidopsis. PMR5 is a member of the TBL (TRICHOME BIREFRINGENCE LIKE) family, which is composed of 46 functionally uncharacterized plant-specific proteins. Initial characterization of this mutant showed that pmr5-mediated disease resistance acts independently of the salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene signal transduction pathways, and that there are changes in the pmr5 cell wall that may be linked to the gain of resistance in the mutant. Specifically, PMR5 may be affecting cell wall pectin by acetylation. Characterization of the pmr5 cell wall has revealed changes in pectin composition and a decrease in acetylation. This is corroborated by the ability of heterologously expressed PMR5 protein to bind to pectin, with decreased binding affinity to acetylated pectin. The cell wall and disease phenotypes of the pmr5 mutant may be revealing a potential role of PMR5 in the elusive plant cell wall integrity-signaling pathway. This work summarizes the continuing efforts in both determining the biochemical function of PMR5 and investigating the mechanism behind pmr5-mediated disease resistance. 1 Dedication To A.Y.L. and T.Y.L. i Table of Contents Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 1 Dedication........................................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ ii List of Figures................................................................................................................................iii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. v Acknowledgements........................................................................................................................ vi CHAPTER 1: Defense at the plant cell wall................................................................................... 1 Preface......................................................................................................................................... 2 Part I: Host pathogen warfare at the plant cell wall.................................................................... 2 Part II: An update on trends in plant cell wall defense: the cell wall integrity (CWI) pathway. 9 Figures....................................................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 2: Investigating the function of PMR5 (POWDERY MILDEW RESISTANT 5).... 18 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 19 Materials and Methods.............................................................................................................. 20 Results....................................................................................................................................... 28 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 42 Figures....................................................................................................................................... 45 Tables........................................................................................................................................ 82 Appendix................................................................................................................................... 93 CHAPTER 3: Identifying potential pmr5-mediated disease resistance pathway partners ........... 95 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 96 Materials and Methods.............................................................................................................. 96 Results....................................................................................................................................... 97 Discussion................................................................................................................................. 99 Tables...................................................................................................................................... 101 CHAPTER 4: Suppressors of pmr5-mediated disease resistance............................................... 107 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 108 Materials and Methods............................................................................................................ 108 Results..................................................................................................................................... 109 Discussion............................................................................................................................... 112 Figures..................................................................................................................................... 114 Tables...................................................................................................................................... 120 CHAPTER 5: A hypothetical model for pmr5-mediated disease resistance .............................. 131 References Cited ......................................................................................................................... 134 ii List of Figures Figure 1.1. Electron micrographs of different pathogens infecting plant cells .............................16 Figure 1.2. Overview of the plant cell signaling components mediating responses upon pathogen attack .............................................................................................................................................17 Figure 2.1. Modified TBL protein family tree with G. cichoracearum phenotypes .....................45 Figure 2.2. Schematic of pectin structure .....................................................................................46 Figure 2.3. Secondary structure alignments of PMR5, putative alpha-galactosidase, and rhamnogalacturonan acetylesterase ...............................................................................................47 Figure 2.4. PMR5 gene expression generated by the eFP browser................................................48 Figure 2.5. Schematic of PMR5 gene structure .............................................................................49 Figure 2.6. Virus induced gene silencing of PMR5 in Arabidopsis...............................................50 Figure 2.7. Complementation after site-directed mutagenesis of catalytic residues .....................52 Figure 2.8. Principle component analysis of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy spectra from wild-type and pmr5 cell walls .......................................................................................................53 Figure 2.9. Oligosaccharide mass profiling analysis of xyloglucan composition ........................54 Figure 2.10. Acetic acid assay comparing acetylation of cell walls ..............................................55 Figure 2.11. Saccharification assay comparing cell wall digestability..........................................56 Figure 2.12. Cell wall immunolabeling of stem sections...............................................................57 Figure 2.13. Example of immunolabeling of spotted extracts with LM6 anti-arabinan antibody.58 Figure 2.14. Glycome profiling of rosette leaves .........................................................................59 Figure 2.15. Arabidopsis seed mucilage is rich in rhamnogalacturonan I ....................................60 Figure 2.16. Morphology and phenotypes of transgenic lines used in localization study.............61 Figure 2.17. FTIR spectrum of cell walls from plants expressing 35S:PMR5-GFP ....................62 Figure 2.18. Localization of PMR5 in plants expressing pPMR5:PMR5:GFP.............................63 Figure 2.19. PMR5 is more highly expressed in root cortical cells in plants expressing pPMR5:PMR5:GFP.......................................................................................................................64
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 Principles of Plant Pathology Path
    PRINCIPLES OF PLANT PATHOLOGY PATH 271 (1+1) Prepared By DR. P. KISHORE VARMA, ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF PLANT PATHOLOGY AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, ASWARAOPET 507 301 1 LECTURE 1 INTRODUCTION TO PLANT PATHOLOGY Why Plant Pathology? Plants are essential for maintenance of life. Plants not only sustain the man and animals, they are also the source of food for multitudes of micro-organisms living in the ecosystem. Thus, while man has been able to subjugate plants and animals for his own use, the competing micro-organisms still defy his efforts and claim a major share of resources which man would like to use for himself. It is in this context that the need for fighting the competing micro-organisms and other agencies that lack loss of productivity has been felt. The attack on plants by these micro-organisms changed the appearance and productivity of the crop and this observed change was called a disease. Plant diseases have been considered as stubborn barriers to the rapid progress of food production. We call a plant healthy only so long as it continues to perform all its normal physiological activities and give the expected yield according to its genetic potentiality. Physiological activities of a healthy plant 1. Normal cell division, differentiation and development. 2. Uptake of water and nutrients from the soil. 3. Synthesis of food from sunlight by photosynthesis. 4. Translocation of water and food to the sites of necessity through xylem and phloem. 5. Metabolism of synthesized material 6. Reproduction A diseased plant fails to perform one or more of these functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Interactions of Zinc with the Intestinal Epithelium - Effects On
    Aus dem Institut für Veterinär-Physiologie des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Interactions of zinc with the intestinal epithelium - effects on transport properties and zinc homeostasis Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Grades eines Doktors der Veterinärmedizin an der Freien U niversität Berlin vorgelegt von Eva-Maria Näser, geb. Gefeller Tierärztin aus Kassel Berlin 2015 Journal-Nr.: 3813 Gefördert durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft und die H.W. Schaumann Stiftung Gedruckt mit Genehmigung des Fachbereichs Veterinärmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin Dekan: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jürgen Zentek Erster Gutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Jörg Rudolf Aschenbach Zweiter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Holger Martens Dritter Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Robert Klopfleisch Deskriptoren (nach CAB-Thesaurus): pigs, weaning, zinc, intestines, epithelium, jejunum, ion transport Tag der Promotion: 15.09.2015 Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.ddb.de> abrufbar. ISBN: 978-3-86387-656-2 Zugl.: Berlin, Freie Univ., Diss., 2015 Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin D 188 Dieses Werk ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Alle Rechte, auch die der Übersetzung, des Nachdruckes und der Vervielfältigung des Buches, oder Teilen daraus, vorbehalten. Kein Teil des Werkes darf ohne schriftliche Genehmigung des Verlages in irgendeiner Form reproduziert oder unter Verwendung elektronischer Systeme verarbeitet, vervielfältigt oder verbreitet werden. Die Wiedergabe von Gebrauchsnamen, Warenbezeichnungen, usw. in diesem Werk berechtigt auch ohne besondere Kennzeichnung nicht zu der Annahme, dass solche Namen im Sinne der Warenzeichen- und Markenschutz-Gesetzgebung als frei zu betrachten wären und daher von jedermann benutzt werden dürfen. This document is protected by copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Parasitic Algae (Chlorophyta: Trentepohliales) in American Samoa1
    Plant-Parasitic Algae (Chlorophyta: Trentepohliales) in American Samoa1 Fnd E. Erooks 2 Abstract: A survey conducted betweenJune 2000 and May 2002 on the island of Tutuila, American Samoa, recorded filamentous green algae of the order Tren­ tepohliales (CWorophyta) and their plant hosts. Putative pathogenicity of the parasitic genus Cephaleuros and its lichenized state, Strig;ula, was also inves­ tigated. Three genera and nine species were identified: Cephaleuros (five spp.), Phycopeltis (two spp.), and Stomatochroon (two spp.). A widely distributed species of Trentepohlia was not classified. These algae occurred on 146 plant species and cultivars in 101 genera and 48 families; 90% of the hosts were dicotyledonous plants. Cephaleuros spp. have aroused worldwide curiosity, confusion, and con­ cern for over a century. Their hyphaelike filaments, sporangiophores, and as­ sociated plant damage have led unsuspecting plant pathologists to misidentify them as fungi, and some phycologists question their parasitic ability. Of the five species of Cephaleuros identified, C. virescens was the most prevalent, followed by C. parasiticus. Leaf tissue beneath thalli of Cephaleuros spp. on 124 different hosts was dissected with a scalpel and depth of necrosis evaluated using a four­ point scale. No injury was observed beneath thalli on 6% of the hosts, but full­ thickness necrosis occurred on leaves of 43% of hosts. Tissue damage beneath nonlichenized Cephaleuros thalli was equal to or greater than damage beneath lichenized thalli (Strig;ula elegans). In spite of moderate to severe leaf necrosis caused by Cephaleuros spp., damage was usually confined to older leaves near the base of plants. Unhealthy, crowded, poorly maintained plants tended to have the highest percentage of leaf surface area affected by TrentepoWiales.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Wall Chemistry Roger M
    3 Cell Wall Chemistry Roger M. Rowell1,3, Roger Pettersen1, James S. Han1, Jeffrey S. Rowell2, and Mandla A. Tshabalala 1USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI 2Department of Forest Ecology and Management, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 3Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI CONTENTS 3.1 Carbohydrate Polymers ..........................................................................................................37 3.1.1 Holocellulose ..............................................................................................................37 3.1.2 Cellulose .....................................................................................................................37 3.1.3 Hemicelluloses............................................................................................................39 3.1.3.1 Hardwood Hemicelluloses ..........................................................................41 3.1.3.2 Softwood Hemicelluloses............................................................................42 3.1.4 Other Minor Polysaccharides .....................................................................................43 3.2 Lignin......................................................................................................................................43 3.3 Extractives ..............................................................................................................................45 3.4 Bark.........................................................................................................................................46
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Alternation of Generations in Land Plants
    Theoriginof alternation of generations inlandplants: afocuson matrotrophy andhexose transport Linda K.E.Graham and LeeW .Wilcox Department of Botany,University of Wisconsin, 430Lincoln Drive, Madison,WI 53706, USA (lkgraham@facsta¡.wisc .edu ) Alifehistory involving alternation of two developmentally associated, multicellular generations (sporophyteand gametophyte) is anautapomorphy of embryophytes (bryophytes + vascularplants) . Microfossil dataindicate that Mid ^Late Ordovicianland plants possessed such alifecycle, and that the originof alternationof generationspreceded this date.Molecular phylogenetic data unambiguously relate charophyceangreen algae to the ancestryof monophyletic embryophytes, and identify bryophytes as early-divergentland plants. Comparison of reproduction in charophyceans and bryophytes suggests that the followingstages occurredduring evolutionary origin of embryophytic alternation of generations: (i) originof oogamy;(ii) retention ofeggsand zygotes on the parentalthallus; (iii) originof matrotrophy (regulatedtransfer ofnutritional and morphogenetic solutes fromparental cells tothe nextgeneration); (iv)origin of a multicellularsporophyte generation ;and(v) origin of non-£ agellate, walled spores. Oogamy,egg/zygoteretention andmatrotrophy characterize at least some moderncharophyceans, and arepostulated to represent pre-adaptativefeatures inherited byembryophytes from ancestral charophyceans.Matrotrophy is hypothesizedto have preceded originof the multicellularsporophytes of plants,and to represent acritical innovation.Molecular
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Wall Ribosomes Nucleus Chloroplast Cytoplasm
    Cell Wall Ribosomes Nucleus Nickname: Protector Nickname: Protein Maker Nickname: Brain The cell wall is the outer covering of a Plant cell. It is Ribosomes read the recipe from the The nucleus is the largest organelle in a cell. The a strong and stiff and made of DNA and use this recipe to make nucleus directs all activity in the cell. It also controls cellulose. It supports and protects the plant cell by proteins. The nucleus tells the the growth and reproduction of the cell. holding it upright. It ribosomes which proteins to make. In humans, the nucleus contains 46 chromosomes allows water, oxygen and carbon dioxide to pass in out They are found in both plant and which are the instructions for all the activities in your of plant cell. animal cells. In a cell they can be found cell and body. floating around in the cytoplasm or attached to the endoplasmic reticulum. Chloroplast Cytoplasm Endoplasmic Reticulum Nickname: Oven Nickname: Gel Nickname: Highway Chloroplasts are oval structures that that contain a green Cytoplasm is the gel like fluid inside a The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the transportation pigment called chlorophyll. This allows plants to make cell. The organelles are floating around in center for the cell. The ER is like the conveyor belt, you their own food through the process of photosynthesis. this fluid. would see at a supermarket, except instead of moving your groceries it moves proteins from one part of the cell Chloroplasts are necessary for photosynthesis, the food to another. The Endoplasmic Reticulum looks like a making process, to occur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Structure, Function, and Biosynthesis of Plant Cell Wall Pectic Polysaccharides
    Carbohydrate Research 344 (2009) 1879–1900 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Carbohydrate Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/carres The structure, function, and biosynthesis of plant cell wall pectic polysaccharides Kerry Hosmer Caffall a, Debra Mohnen a,b,* a University of Georgia, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, 315 Riverbend Road Athens, GA 30602, United States b DOE BioEnergy Science Center (BESC), 315 Riverbend Road Athens, GA 30602, United States article info abstract Article history: Plant cell walls consist of carbohydrate, protein, and aromatic compounds and are essential to the proper Received 18 November 2008 growth and development of plants. The carbohydrate components make up 90% of the primary wall, Received in revised form 4 May 2009 and are critical to wall function. There is a diversity of polysaccharides that make up the wall and that Accepted 6 May 2009 are classified as one of three types: cellulose, hemicellulose, or pectin. The pectins, which are most abun- Available online 2 June 2009 dant in the plant primary cell walls and the middle lamellae, are a class of molecules defined by the pres- ence of galacturonic acid. The pectic polysaccharides include the galacturonans (homogalacturonan, Keywords: substituted galacturonans, and RG-II) and rhamnogalacturonan-I. Galacturonans have a backbone that Cell wall polysaccharides consists of -1,4-linked galacturonic acid. The identification of glycosyltransferases involved in pectin Galacturonan a Glycosyltransferases synthesis is essential to the study of cell wall function in plant growth and development and for maxi- Homogalacturonan mizing the value and use of plant polysaccharides in industry and human health.
    [Show full text]
  • IAWA Bulletin N.S., Vol. 3 (1),1982 3 ANTONI V an LEEUWENHOEK
    IAWA Bulletin n.s., Vol. 3 (1),1982 3 ANTONI VAN LEEUWENHOEK AND HIS OBSERVATION ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE WOODY CELL WALL by Pieter Baas Rijksherbarium, Leiden, The Netherlands Summary Following general remarks on the life of Van be traced back to negative but ill-informed Leeuwenhoek and his role in wood anatomy, judgements in some authoritative 19th and his account of the structure of a torn vessel 20th century publications (Baas, 1982a, b). wall of nutmeg rootwood is discussed in detail. Van Leeuwenhoek should be credited with The cross-wise orientation of minute 'vessels or many detailed and original wood and bark ana­ fibres' as observed and interpreted by Van tomical observations, but his work is not easily Leeuwenhoek can be considered to be the first accessible, being scattered in numerous letters, (unintentional) correct record of the fibrillar most of them also dealing with other microsco­ nature of the woody cell wall. pic subjects. Although most of these letters were published in various instalments and sev­ Introduction eral languages during Van Leeuwenhoek's life­ Antoni van Leeuwenhoek was born in 1632, time, this presentation cannot compete with 350 years ago, in Delft (the Netherlands) as the the balanced treatises by Grew and Malpighi, son of a basket maker. Apprenticed to a cloth who each published books solely dealing with merchant, Van Leeuwenhoek's career started as plant structure and function. a shopkeeper. Later he would serve as usher to Interest in Van Leeuwenhoek's plant anato­ the aldermen, chief warden and wine-gauger of mical work has recently also been revived by the City of Delft, and surveyor to the Court of the rediscovery of some of his sections among Holland.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary and Secondary Plant Cell Walls: a Comparative Overview*
    36 New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 36(1) PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PLANT CELL WALLS: A COMPARATIVE OVERVIEW* PHILIP J. HARRIS School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand [email protected] (Received for publication 23 November 2005; revision 3 February 2006) ABSTRACT Light and transmission electron microscopy are used in studying wall morphology and histochemical methods, including immunocytochemistry, can be used to locate specific compounds in walls. All plant cell walls contain a fibrillar phase of cellulose microfibrils and a matrix phase which contains a high proportion of non-cellulosic polysaccharides that vary in their chemical structures, depending on wall type and plant taxon. The non-cellulosic polysaccharide compositions of three common wall types — lignified secondary walls, non-lignified secondary walls, and non-lignified primary walls — exemplify this. The principles used in constructing the most recent models of non-lignified primary walls can be used in modelling lignified secondary walls. Keywords: primary cell walls; secondary cell walls; cell-wall models; non- cellulosic polysaccharides; transmission electron microscopy; light microscopy; chemistry; lignified walls; immuno- cytochemistry; histochemistry INTRODUCTION This review provides a brief comparative overview of primary and secondary cell walls of seed plants. A primary wall is defined as a wall that is deposited while the cell is still enlarging, whereas a secondary wall is deposited on the primary wall after cell expansion has stopped, and can be seen in sections as a structurally distinct layer (or layers) that is often very much thicker than the primary wall (Harris 2005a). At maturity, the different cell types can be grouped according to whether they have only a primary wall or both a primary and a secondary wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Pathology
    Plant Pathology 330-1 Reading / Reference Materials CSU Extension Fact Sheets o Aspen and poplar leaf spots – #2.920 o Backyard orchard: apples and pears [pest management] – #2.800 o Backyard orchard: stone fruits [pest management] – #2.804 o Bacterial wetwood – #2.910 o Cytospora canker – #2.937 o Diseases of roses in Colorado – #2.946 o Dollar spot disease of turfgrass – #2.933 o Dutch elm disease – #5.506 o Dwarf mistletoe management – #2.925 o Fairy ring in turfgrass – #2.908 o Fire blight – #2.907 o Forest fire – Insects and diseases associated with forest fires – #6.309 o Friendly pesticides for home gardens – #2.945 o Greenhouse plant viruses (TSWV-INSV) – #2.947 o Honeylocust diseases – #2.939 o Juniper-hawthorn rust – #2.904 o Juniper-hawthorn rust – #2.904 o Leaf spot and melting out diseases – #2.909 o Necrotic ring spot in turfgrass – #2.900 o Non-chemical disease control – #2.903 o Pesticides – Friendly pesticides for home gardens – #2.945 o Pinyon pine insects and diseases – #2.948 o Powdery mildew – #2.902 o Roses – Diseases of roses in Colorado – #2.946 o Russian olive decline and gummosis – #2.942 o Strawberry diseases – #2.931 o Sycamore anthracnose – #2.930 CSU Extension Publications o Insects and diseases of woody plants of the central Rockies – 506A Curriculum developed by Mary Small, CSU Extension, Jefferson County • Colorado State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture and Colorado counties cooperating. • CSU Extension programs are available to all without discrimination. • No endorsement of products named is intended, nor is criticism implied of products not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Structure and Function in the Bacteria and Archaea
    4 Chapter Preview and Key Concepts 4.1 1.1 DiversityThe Beginnings among theof Microbiology Bacteria and Archaea 1.1. •The BacteriaThe are discovery classified of microorganismsinto several Cell Structure wasmajor dependent phyla. on observations made with 2. theThe microscope Archaea are currently classified into two 2. •major phyla.The emergence of experimental 4.2 Cellscience Shapes provided and Arrangements a means to test long held and Function beliefs and resolve controversies 3. Many bacterial cells have a rod, spherical, or 3. MicroInquiryspiral shape and1: Experimentation are organized into and a specific Scientificellular c arrangement. Inquiry in the Bacteria 4.31.2 AnMicroorganisms Overview to Bacterialand Disease and Transmission Archaeal 4.Cell • StructureEarly epidemiology studies suggested how diseases could be spread and 4. Bacterial and archaeal cells are organized at be controlled the cellular and molecular levels. 5. • Resistance to a disease can come and Archaea 4.4 External Cell Structures from exposure to and recovery from a mild 5.form Pili allowof (or cells a very to attach similar) to surfacesdisease or other cells. 1.3 The Classical Golden Age of Microbiology 6. Flagella provide motility. Our planet has always been in the “Age of Bacteria,” ever since the first 6. (1854-1914) 7. A glycocalyx protects against desiccation, fossils—bacteria of course—were entombed in rocks more than 3 billion 7. • The germ theory was based on the attaches cells to surfaces, and helps observations that different microorganisms years ago. On any possible, reasonable criterion, bacteria are—and always pathogens evade the immune system. have been—the dominant forms of life on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Etiology,Loss, Symptoms and Control of Diseases
    Phytopathology is a branch of Botany that deals with causal organism,etiology,loss, symptoms and control of diseases. ETIOLOGY:-Science of cause of disease. Pathology (Greek word‘Pathos’ and ‘Logos’.) Pathos =Suffering Logos=Study “Study of Plant Sufferings” Or “Study of Plant Diseases”. FATHER OF PLANT PATHOLOGY- ANTON de Bary. Aims of plant pathology } To make a survey of the living as well as non- living causes of the diseases. } To study the different types of mechanisms by which the diseases are developed in plants. } To elucidate the interaction mechanism among plants,pathogen and the environment. } Minimize the loss of useful plants through application of the principles of plant disease prevention. } To prevent plant disease epidemics or to delay their onset until the harvest time is over. DISEASE Disease in a plant involves a number of harmful Physiological processes which leads to a lot of irregularities in the morphology and anatomy of the host. SYMPTOMS The altered and disadvantageous differences of the host from the normal plant are referred to as Symptoms of the disease. 1. Host : An organism that harbours or supports the activities of a parasite . 2.Suscept :An organism that is susceptible or prone to disease. 3.Susceptibility :It is the inability of a plant to resist the effect of a pathogen or any other damaging factor. 4.Parasite :It is an organism or virus existing in an intimate association with another living organism from which it derives an essential part of the materials for its existance. 5.Pathogen :A pathogen is an organism or virus capable of causing disease in a particular host.
    [Show full text]