DOCSLIB.ORG

Curriculum Vitae - ALAN FEDUCCIA (2020)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curriculum Vitae - ALAN FEDUCCIA (2020) Brevum Curriculum Vitae - ALAN FEDUCCIA (2020) Position: S. K. Heninger Distinguished Professor Emeritus, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Education: Ph.D. Zoology University of Michigan, l969 (NSF Predoctoral Fellow) M.A. Zoology University of Michigan, l966 B.S. Zoology Louisiana State University, l965 (pdf of 2008 museum article attached). Languages: French, Spanish, Italian (conversational). S. K. Heninger Distinguished Professor, University of North Carolina, 1994-2007 (emeritus). Chairman, Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, July 1997-2002. Chairman, Division of Natural Sciences, UNC, 1996-1997; resigned to become Chair. Associate Chair, Department of Biology, July, l982 -1992. Research Associate, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, 1978-1987. William R. Kenan, Jr. Visiting Professor, Smithsonian Institution, 1978. Assistant, Associate, Full Professor, Biology UNC, 1971-74, 1974-79, 1979-2007. Assistant Professor of Biology, Southern Methodist University, 1970-71. Lecturer in Biology, University of Michigan, 1969. Fellow, American Ornithologists’ Union, 1976. Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1994. Who’s Who in America, 2004. Albert Nelson Marquis Lifetime Achievement Award, 2018. Naming Recognition: -Presbyorniformipes feduccii, 1995, Presbyornis-like webbed trackway (Eocene) named for Alan Feduccia who identified the trackmaker. -Confuciusornis feducciai, 2009, new species of 120-million-year-old, earliest beaked bird (below), named by Chinese scientists, for Alan Feduccia: “for his contributions to his study of the origin and evolution of birds.” 1 -Feducciavis loftini, 2011, Miocene tern, named by Smithsonian scientist, for Alan Feduccia, citing “his many contributions to the study of fossil birds and his dedication to truth in the search for bird origins.” -Microraptor (four-winged Chinese fossil) named “Alan” for children’s book Comet’s Jurassic Adventure (2017). - Alan Feduccia Distinguished Professorship, established by the University of North Carolina College of Arts and Sciences, 2008. Teaching and Lectures: College Lights Lecturer, fall, 1997. Favorite Faculty Award, Senior Class of 1997. Selected as a Carolina Speaker, 1998-present. Bowman and Gordon Gray Professorship for excellence in undergratuate teaching, finalist, 1995. Who’s Who Among America’s Favorite Teachers, 1998. Invitee: Renaissance Weekend, 1996- present. Member, Oxford Round Table, Oxford University. Distinguished Lectures: -Plenary lecture, American Ornithologists’ Union, Winnipeg, 1976 (first presentation of theory of “Bird Evolution’s Big Bang”). -Delta State University, Commencement speech (Honors Day), The World We Live In, 1990. -Linnaean Society of New York, annual banquet lecture, 1997. -University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 1997. College Lights Lecture. 2 -Lehigh University, Department of Biology, Honors Day Lecture, 1998. -University of Michigan, Donald W. Tinkle Distinguished Lecture, 1998. -Appalachian State University, annual Sigma Xi lecture, 1999. -Plenary lecture, Society of Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Beijing, 2000. -German Ornithological Society, 250th Anniversary Lecture, Leipzig, Germany, 2000. -Texas A & M University, Biology Department, Honors Day Lecture, 2001. -Watkins Distinguished Visiting Professor, Wichita State University, 2002 (two lectures). -Smithsonian Institution, Distinguished Lecturer, 2002. -University of South Dakota, annual Geology Week Distinguished Lecturer, 2003. -Delta State University, Caylor-White Biology, building dedication speech, 2004. -Stephen F. Austin University, J. H. Burr, Jr. Distinguished Lecture, 2003. -Virginia Commonwealth University, annual Darwin Day Lecture, 2004. -San Diego Museum of Natural History, 2004, lecture, bird origins. -College of Charleston, Honors Day Lecture, 2005. -North Carolina Academy of Science, annual keynote lecture, 2006. -Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Keynote Address: Mark Catesby and his Natural History . An Introduction and Perspective, 2008. -Oxford University symposium lecture for Oxford Round Table: Darwin, Creationism and the Development of Consensus Science, 2009. Notable interviews and profiles: -Discover, Top 50 science stories, 1993, 1996; Science News, News of the Year, 1995. Discover: Profile, Scientist of the Month, 1998, filmed interview; February 2003, NPR, All Things Considered, Interview on ‘Origins of Flight’ by John Nielsen, Jan. 2003); ABC, Quantum (Australia), filmed interview on bird flight origins, 1993; MacNeil-Lahrer News Hour filmed interview, 1995; BBC filmed interview on newly discovered Chinese fossils. NHK (Japan) filmed interview on bird origins, 1998. Numerous PBS appearances. Notable service: -Board of Governors, University of North Carolina Press, 1998-2006.-Board of Directors, UNC Arts and Sciences Foundation, 2000-2007 (founding member, 1983). -Board of Trustees, NC Botanical Garden, 1997-2002. -Member, Committee for Endowed Chairs, 1996-1997. -Member, Committee on a Space for Science, 1996-2000. -Committee on Promotions and Tenure, College of Arts and Sciences, 1997-2002. -Chair, UNC Genome Sciences Building Design Committee, 1999-2003 (pioneered building, gained initial approval for building; 128,000 sq. ft. building completed Oct., 2012 (120 million dollars). [http://genomics.unc.edu/events/gsbSymp/]. 3 -Member, College Planning Committee, Division of Basic and Applied Science, 1996. -Dean’s Advisory Committee (elected to two 2-yr. terms,1998-2002). -Member, UNC Provost & Executive Vice Chancellor Search Committee, 1999-2000. -Member, Review Committee, Program in Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, 2003. -Chair, Committee on reappointment of the UNC Dean of the School of Medicine, 2001. -Faculty Advisor, Phi Gamma Delta fraternity, 1989-1992. -Consultant for Hiring, Tenure and Promotion: Harvard, Chicago, Pittsburgh, Duke, Smithsonian Institution, Kansas, Clemson, LSU, University of Florida, etc. -Member, Ecology Curriculum. -Member, Board of Directors, Organization for Tropical Studies, 1973-74. -Member, Curriculum Review Committee, College of Arts and Sciences, 1987-1990. -Member, Administrative Board, College of Arts and Sciences, 1987-90. -Member, Subcommittee on General Education, College of Arts and Sciences, 1989-90. -Member, Appeals Committee, College of Arts and Sciences, 1989-90. -Member, School of Medicine Curriculum Review Committee, 1982-83. Invited Lectures: 30 invited lectures, 1996-2003: including, Duke University, Univ. of New Mexico (2 lectures), NC State University, Texas A & M University (Honors Day), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (Geology); University of Kansas, Cornell University Laboratory of Ornithology (1997), N.C. State University (1997), University of Georgia (State of the Art Series on “Origins”), Georgia College and State University, University of Michigan (Tinkle Memorial Lecture), Michigan State University, Lehigh University (Honors Day Lecture), Appalachian State University (Annual Sigma Xi Banquet lecture), Guilford College, UNC Greensboro (1998); New Bern, NC, Rothermel Foundation (evolution/creation debate), Old Dominian University (Darwin Day Lecture), Linnaean Society of New York (annual banquet lecture 1997), Louisiana State University 1998 (two lectures), Clemson University, Plenary lecture for Society for Avian Paleontology and Evolution, Beijing, 2000, Plenary lecture for 150th Anniversary Meeting of the German Ornithological Society, 2000, Watkins Distinguished Lecturer, 2001, Wichita State University, 2001 (two lectures), Smithsonian Distinguished Lecturer, fall 2002, Rutgers University, 2002; University of South Carolina, 2002; UNC- Charlotte, fall, 2003, Linnaean Society of New York (2004), College of Charleston, 2005 (Biology Honors Day), Stephen F. Austin State University, 2003 (Burr Distinguished Lecturer, Honors Day). (Plus, over 20 public NC lectures). 2012-2013---Numerous book talks, entitled, “Avian Origins: Five Major Blunders of Paleontology”---based on Riddle of the Feathered Dragons: Hidden Birds of China. 4 Publication Summary: (author of 160+ publications, including seven major books and various editions and translations, and five monographs): Books and Monographs: l973. Evolutionary Trends in the Neotropical Ovenbirds and Woodhewers. Ornithological Monographs, No. 13, iv + 69 pp., 20 text figures. (Ph.D. dissertation). l975. Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates: A Laboratory Text for Comparative Vertebrate Anatomy. New York: W. W. Norton & Co., Inc. viii + l68 pp., l25 ill. 1975. Morphology of the Bony Stapes (Columella) in the Passeriformes and Related Groups: Evolutionary Implications. University of Kansas, Museum of Natural History, Miscellaneous Publications 63: l-34; 7 figs., l6 pls. l979. (with Theodore W. Torrey). Morphogenesis of the Vertebrates. 4th ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons. xii + 570 pp., 370 figs. l980. (with Storrs L. Olson, senior author). Relationships and Evolution of Flamingos (Aves: Phoenicopteridae). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 316, iii + 73 pp., 40 figs. (Reviewed in Nature, Jan. 24, l981, and Science Digest, August, l981). l980. (with Storrs L. Olson, senior author). Presbyornis and the Origin of the Anseriformes. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 323, iii + 24 pp., l5 figs. 5 l980. The Age of Birds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. xi + 208 pp., 76 halftones, and l32 line drawings. (Reviewed in: New York Times, Oct. 7, l980; Newsweek, Dec. 8, l980; Discover, Dec.,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alan Feduccia's Riddle of the Feathered Dragons: What Reptiles
    Leigh Evolution: Education and Outreach 2014, 7:9 http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/7/1/9 BOOK REVIEW Open Access Alan Feduccia’s Riddle of the Feathered Dragons: what reptiles gave rise to birds? Egbert Giles Leigh Jr Riddle of the Feathered Dragons: Hidden Birds of China, properly. This is a great pity, for his story is wonderful: by Alan Feduccia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, his birds would have made a far better focus for this 2012. Pp. x + 358. H/b $55.00 book than the dispute. This book’s author is at home in the paleontology, So, what is this dispute that spoiled the book? The anatomy, physiology, and behavior of birds. Who could scientific argument is easily summarized. It started be more qualified to write on their origin and evolution? when a paleontologist from Yale University, John Ostrom, This book is unusually, indeed wonderfully, well and unearthed a 75-kg bipedal theropod dinosaur, Deinonychus, clearly illustrated: its producers cannot be praised too buried 110 million years ago in Montana. Deinonychus highly. It is well worth the while of anyone interested in stood a meter tall, and its tail was 1.5 m long. It was active: bird evolution to read it. Although it offers no answers Ostrom thought that both it and Archaeopteryx,which to ‘where birds came from’, it has God’s plenty of fascin- lived 40 million years earlier, were warm-blooded. Deinony- ating, revealing detail, knit together in powerful criticism chus bore many skeletal resemblances to Archaeopteryx, of prevailing views of bird evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Avian Evolution Phylogeny and Evolution of the Aves
    Phylogeny and Avian Evolution Phylogeny and Evolution of the Aves I. Background Scientists have speculated about evolution of birds ever since Darwin. Difficult to find relatives using only modern animals After publi cati on of “O rigi i in of S peci es” (~1860) some used birds as a counter-argument since th ere were no k nown t ransiti onal f orms at the time! • turtles have modified necks and toothless beaks • bats fly and are warm blooded With fossil discovery other potential relationships! • Birds as distinct order of reptiles Many non-reptilian characteristics (e.g. endothermy, feathers) but really reptilian in structure! If birds only known from fossil record then simply be a distinct order of reptiles. II. Reptile Evolutionary History A. “Stem reptiles” - Cotylosauria Must begin in the late Paleozoic ClCotylosauri a – “il”“stem reptiles” Radiation of reptiles from Cotylosauria can be organized on the basis of temporal fenestrae (openings in back of skull for muscle attachment). Subsequent reptilian lineages developed more powerful jaws. B. Anapsid Cotylosauria and Chelonia have anapsid pattern C. Syypnapsid – single fenestra Includes order Therapsida which gave rise to mammalia D. Diapsida – both supppratemporal and infratemporal fenestrae PttPattern foun did in exti titnct arch osaurs, survi iiving archosaurs and also in primitive lepidosaur – ShSpheno don. All remaining living reptiles and the lineage leading to Aves are classified as Diapsida Handout Mammalia Extinct Groups Cynodontia Therapsida Pelycosaurs Lepidosauromorpha Ichthyosauria Protorothyrididae Synapsida Anapsida Archosauromorpha Euryapsida Mesosaurs Amphibia Sauria Diapsida Eureptilia Sauropsida Amniota Tetrapoda III. Relationshippp to Reptiles Most groups present during Mesozoic considere d ancestors to bird s.
    [Show full text]
  • Feathers Fly in Beijing
    news meeting report Feathers fly in Beijing The question of whether birds evolved from dinosaurs arouses strong opinions. Rex Dalton reports on a scientific meeting that at times bore more resemblance to a political sparring match. hen ornithologists and palaeon- tologists rolled into Beijing earlier Wthis month for the fifth quadren- nial meeting of the Society of Avian Paleon- tology and Evolution, it seemed like a per- fect opportunity to try and resolve the long- running debate over whether birds evolved from dinosaurs. Northeast China has produced a wealth of bird and dinosaur fossils in recent years, Bone China: this skull and these have been used to explore the links of a feathered dinosaur, between the two groups. At the meeting, Caudipteryx zoui, is one Chinese scientists showed off some newly of the exciting new discovered specimens, which might help to fossils emerging from answer important evolutionary questions. northeast China. But by the close of the meeting, hosted by Beijing’s Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology evolutionary origin as the hair-like integu- Hutchinson, who studies at Berkeley with and Paleoanthropology (IVPP), the divi- mentary filaments seen on many dinosaur Kevin Padian, a leading proponent of the idea sions between those who believe birds fossils, he was accused by Storrs Olson, head that birds evolved from dinosaurs, presented evolved from dinosaurs and those who dis- of ornithology at the National Museum of data on hind-limb evolution. Hutchinson agree appeared greater than ever. Several Natural History in Washington DC, of engag- compares bones of fossils and existing species attendees were disappointed that progressive ing in “ideological mumbo jumbo”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Evolution of Birds, 2Nd Edition
    Reviews EDITED BY REBECCA L. HOLBERTON Thefollowing critiques express the opinions ofthe individual evaluators regarding the strengths, weaknesses,and value of thebooks they review. As such,the appraisals are subjective assessments and do not necessarilyreflect the opinions of theeditors or any officialpolicy of theAmerican Ornithologists'Union. TheAuk 117(4):1084-1085,2000 The Origin and Evolution of Birds, 2nd Edi- aminedmore closely b'yChinese paleontologists, it tion.--Alan Feduccia. 1999. Yale University Press, wasfound to be a compositefossil consisting of the New Haven, Connecticut.x + 466 pp., numeroustext body of a bird and the tail of a dromaeosauriddi- figures.ISBN 0-300-07861-1.Paper, $29.95--This is nosaur;it wasput togetherby a cleverChinese farm- the secondand paperbackedition of Alan Feduccia's er on whose land the fossils were found and who re- outstandingcoverage of the origin and evolutionof alized that a completefossil was morevaluable than birds(see Auk 114:531-534 for my reviewof theorig- its parts.The farmer had completely fooled those sci- inal 1997 edition). This edition containssome defi- entistswho saw just what they wanted to see:a nite improvements,including being printed on bet- feathereddinosaur. This caseis rathertypical of the ter paperwith a substantialincrease in the qualityof confusionbeing generated in boththe scientificand the illustrationsand a lowercost that places this vol- lay journalsto publishin hasteon newlydiscovered umewithin reachof mostornithologists. Aside from fossils. a new final chapterentitled "T. rexwas no Four-Ton Equallyimportant to consideris thatmost of the Roadrunner and Other Revelations," and the addi- avianand otherMesozoic fossils pertinent to under- tionalcitations that are integratedin the references, standingthe originand early evolution of birdshave the material in this edition is the same as the first edi- not been sufficientlyprepared, described,and ana- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Birds
    Sample Academic Reading Sentence Completion [Note: This is an extract from a Part 2 task about the evolution of birds and their ancestry.] The origins of birds The science of evolutionary relationships has undergone a major change in recent decades. It used to be the case that all the features of organisms were important in working out their family tree. But following the work of German entomologist Willi Hennig, many evolutionary scientists now believe that the only features which carry any useful information are the evolutionary ‘novelties’ shared between organisms. Mice, lizards and fish, for example, all have backbones – so the feature ‘backbone’ tells us nothing about their evolutionary relationship. But the feature ‘four legs’ is useful because it’s an evolutionary novelty – a characteristic shared only between the lizard and the mouse. This would suggest that the lizard and mouse are more closely related to each other than either is to the fish. This revolutionary approach is called cladistics, and it has been central to the idea that birds evolved from dinosaurs. The ‘birds are dinosaurs’ theory was first developed by English palaeontologist Thomas Huxley (1825–1895). According to some accounts, one evening Huxley went to dinner still thinking about a mystery dinosaur bone in his lab. He knew he was dealing with the lower leg bone (tibia) of a meat-eating, two-legged dinosaur belonging to the classification known as theropods, but attached to the tibia was an unidentified extra bone. On the menu that evening was quail, a small bird similar to a pheasant, and Huxley noticed the same strange bone, attached to the quail tibia on his plate.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Feathered Dinosaurs Exist? Testing the Hypothesis on Neontological and Paleontological Evidence
    JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 266:000–000 (2005) Do Feathered Dinosaurs Exist? Testing the Hypothesis on Neontological and Paleontological Evidence Alan Feduccia,1* Theagarten Lingham-Soliar,2 and J. Richard Hinchliffe3 1Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280 2Department of Zoology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban 4000, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 3Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The origin of birds and avian flight from KEY WORDS: feathered dinosaurs; theropod; feather within the archosaurian radiation has been among the most morphogenesis; dromaeosaur; integument; collagen; dig- contentious issues in paleobiology. Although there is general its; frame-shift; limb morphogenesis agreement that birds are related to theropod dinosaurs at some level, debate centers on whether birds are derived “When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said in rather a directly from highly derived theropods, the current dogma, scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean — or from an earlier common ancestor lacking suites of derived neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, anatomical characters. Recent discoveries from the Early “whether you can make words mean so many different Cretaceous of China have highlighted the debate, with things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which claims of the discovery of all stages of feather evolution and is to be master — that’s all.” —Lewis Carroll, 1871. ancestral birds (theropod dinosaurs), although the deposits Prior to the 1970s birds and dinosaurs were are at least 25 million years younger than those containing the earliest known bird Archaeopteryx.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds Are Dinosaurs: Simple Answer to a Complex Problem
    Commentary The Auk 119(4):1187±1201, 2002 Birds are Dinosaurs: Simple Answer to a Complex Problem ALAN FEDUCCIA1 Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA Richard Prum's (2002) rancorous, unreviewed es- sported a vertical pubis, with fully developed pubic say on the theropod origin of birds is a one-sided foot and a predatory hand. Often a hypertrophied view of a dif®cult problem, full of anatomical mis- second foot sickle claw, like that of Deinonychus,was conceptions that are highly misleading, and advo- on display. Now, with the discovery of early Creta- cates that (p. 13), ``it is time to abandon debate on the ceous dromaeosaurs with somewhat retroverted pu- theropod origin of birds.'' His article is essentially a bes, Archaeopteryx has gradually had its pubis restatement and defense of a current dogma of pa- pushed back to the opisthopubic position to conform leontologyÐthat birds are living dinosaurs, directly to the most current view of dromaeosaurs and is of- descended from, or having shared common ancestry ten depicted as a terrestrial predator, with a sickle with, one of the most highly derived and specialized claw (Paul 2002), despite evidence that Archaeopteryx groups of Cretaceous theropods, the dromaeosaurs was arboreal (Feduccia 1993), and clearly did not (and Cretaceous troodontids), that are presumed to possess such a claw. Because all the known thero- have had ghost lineages going back into the Jurassic pods were terrestrial predators, Ostrom (1979) sug- Period. Advocates on both sides of the debate agree gested that the ¯ight feathers must have elongated in that birds are related to dinosaurs, but opponents of the context of insect traps and were later preadapted the birds-are-dinosaurs movement, including my- for ¯ight.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesozoic Birds of China
    Mesozoic Birds of China by Lianhai Hou Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology Published by the Phoenix Valley Provincial Aviary of Taiwan Translated By Will Downs Bilby Research Center Northern Arizona University January, 2001 III Table of Contents Abvreviations for figures ..................................................................V Foreword by Delongjiang..................................................................X Foreword by Guangmei Zheng ..........................................................XI Foreword by Alan Feduccia............................................................XIII Foreword by Larry D. Martin..........................................................XIV Preface .....................................................................................XV Chapter 1. Synopsis of research Historical and geographic synopsis........................................................1 History of research ..........................................................................7 Chapter 2. Taxonomic descriptions...............................................................10 Sauriurae.............................................................................................11 Confuciusornithiformes Confuciusornithidae Confuciusornis Confuciusornis sanctus ........................................11 Confuciusornis chuonzhous sp. nov.........................33 Confuciusornis suniae sp. nov................................37 Jibeinia luanhera .........................................................50
    [Show full text]
  • The Hand of Birds Revealed by Early Ostrich Embryos
    Naturwissenschaften (2002) 89:391–393 DOI 10.1007/s00114-002-0350-y SHORT COMMUNICATION Alan Feduccia · Julie Nowicki The hand of birds revealed by early ostrich embryos Received: 11 May 2002 / Accepted: 26 June 2002 / Published online: 14 August 2002 © Springer-Verlag 2002 Abstract The problem of resolving the homology of the We bracketed ostrich embryos, concentrating on the digits of the avian hand has been framed as a conflict be- period of development of major skeletal features. We tween paleontological and embryological evidence, the incubated ostrich eggs and obtained embryos at 1-day former thought to support a hand composed of digits I, intervals representing the period of early appendicular II, III, because of similarity of the phalangeal formulae skeleton development, days 8–14 (or 15), (with two of the earliest known bird Archaeopteryx to that of embryos at 10 and 14–15 days). Embryos were fixed in Mesozoic pentadactyl archosaurs, while embryological 10% formalin, stained with alcian blue, and cleared in a evidence has traditionally favored a II, III, IV avian glycerol/potassium hydroxide series. We also studied hand. We have identified the critical developmental peri- embryos at 17, 18, 20, 22, 28 days of incubation. od for the major features of the avian skeleton in a primi- Amniotes share a stereotyped, early developmental tive bird, the ostrich. Analysis of digit anlagen in the pattern of stylopod (humerus/femur) and zeugopod avian hand has revealed those for digits/metacarpals I elements (radius/tibia and ulna/fibula), characterized by and V, thus confirming previous embryological studies Y-shaped condensations (Müller and Alberch 1990; that indirectly suggested that the avian hand comprises Burke and Feduccia 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • A New Family of Bird-Like Dinosaurs Linking Laurasia and Gondwanaland
    Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 5(2):133-138, June 1985 A NEW FAMILY OF BIRD-LIKE DINOSAURS LINKING LAURASIA AND GONDWANALAND M. K. BRETT-SURMAN' and GREGORY S. PAUU 'Department of Geology, Division of Geobiology, George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052 23109 N. Calvert St., Baltimore, Maryland 21218 ABSTRACT - A new family oftheropod dinosaurs is described based on metatarsi f:T0m~ o~h ~merica and Argentina. Because birds are theropod descendants, there are.often proble~s ill assigning isolated metatarsi to the proper group. Differences between the metatarsi of ground birds ~d theropods are detailed. In particular, it is shown that the length/width ratio of articulated metatarsi cannot be used to distinguish higher taxa. This new family represents the first occurrence ofthe same.genus of theropod dinosaur from both Laurasia and Gondwanaland at the end of the Cretaceous, a time when the two supercontinents were supposedly still separate. INTRODUCTION nia (Berkeley); UNT = Universidad Nacional de Tu- cuman. In 1975, an expedition from the University ofCal- ifornia (Berkeley) collecting in the Hell Creek For- mation (Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of Mo?tana, ~e- THEROPOD AND BIRD METATARSI covered fragments of fossil bird bones associated WIth A series of studies conclusively demonstrates that dinosaurian and other reptilian remains. This collec- theropod dinosaurs and birds have an ancestor-de- tion included a complete metatarsus (UCMP 117600, scendantrelationship (Ostrom, 1974, 1976;Bakker and Fig. 3A-I) that was called dinosaurian by neo0!lli- Galton, 1974; Bakker, 1975; Osmolska, 1981; Padian, thologists but avian by most dinosaur paleontologists! 1982; Paul, 1984; Benton, 1984; Paul and Carpenter, The question then arose as to how to separate the unpublished).
    [Show full text]
  • Jurassic Archosaur Is a Non-Dinosaurian Bird
    Jurassic archosaur is a non-dinosaurian bird Stephen A. Czerkas & Alan Feduccia Journal of Ornithology ISSN 2193-7192 Volume 155 Number 4 J Ornithol (2014) 155:841-851 DOI 10.1007/s10336-014-1098-9 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy J Ornithol (2014) 155:841–851 DOI 10.1007/s10336-014-1098-9 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Jurassic archosaur is a non-dinosaurian bird Stephen A. Czerkas • Alan Feduccia Received: 17 April 2014 / Revised: 4 June 2014 / Accepted: 13 June 2014 / Published online: 9 July 2014 Ó Dt. Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2014 Abstract Re-examination utilizing Keyence 3D digital Keywords Scansoriopteryx Á Epidendrosaurus Á microscopy and low angled illumination of the fossil Theropod Á Archosaur Á Daohugou Biota Á Jurassic Scansoriopteryx, a problematic sparrow-size pre-Archae- opteryx specimen from the Jurassic Daohugou Biotas, pro- Zusammenfassung vides new evidence which challenges the widely accepted hypothesis that birds are derived from dinosaurs in which Archosaurier aus dem Jura ist ein nicht-dinosaurischer avian flight originated from cursorial forms.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15, the Mistaken Extinction, by Lowell Dingus and Timothy Rowe, New York, W
    Chapter 15, The Mistaken Extinction, by Lowell Dingus and Timothy Rowe, New York, W. H. Freeman, 1998. Chapter 15 Crossing the Boundary The early history of birds is hotly debated because it offers a new perspective on both the K-T extinction and one of the greatest adaptive radiations in vertebrate history. Adaptive radiation is evolutionary diversification on a grand scale, often occurring in a relatively short geological time span. Lineages split again and again, rapidly filling environmental niches with a new dynasty of novel species. Tropical forests and islands have hosted some of the greatest rapid adaptive radiations in history. Organisms that somehow invade an island at the right time or find an unoccupied level of forest canopy may exploit a wide new landscape of opportunities for themselves and their offspring. The famous adaptive radiation of finches and tortoises on the Galápagos Islands profoundly shaped Darwin’s ideas on evolution and natural selection. Archipelagos, lakes, caves, and rift valleys may all serve as spawning grounds for adaptive radiations by providing isolation from parent populations and new ecological opportunities for the proliferating species. The impact of an adaptive radiation upon the local economy of nature can be far-reaching. Non-avian dinosaurs underwent an adaptive radiation during the Mesozoic that generated the hundreds of species and enormous diversity of shapes described earlier1. But that was just the beginning. The adaptive radiation of avian dinosaurs was even greater, yielding more than
    [Show full text]