Part II. the State of Epidemic, Epizootic, and Epiphytic Disease In
REPOKT ON EPIDEMICS, 18G1-2. 393 Part II. The State of Epidemic, Epizootic, and Epiphytic Disease in Great Britain, in 1861-62. By J. N. RADCLIFFE, M.R.C.S. The following Report refers to the twelve months ending November the 31st, 1862. In respect of epidemics, this Report is necessarily based on the different returns of the Registrars-General of England and Scotland, published during the period to which it relates. The information contained in these returns on outbreaks of epidemic disease, at the time of, or soon after, their occurrence, is very imperfect. No other source of information, however, exists, or if existing, is accessible. I propose to bring the different facts on epi- demics together in one connected view. The history thus formed will fall far short of what a scientific annual record of epidemic diseases should be; but the first step towards a more perfect history must be the systematic collation of exist- ing materials. It is necessary to remark that, in the subsequent report, I have, as a rule, substituted the term continued fever for the word typhus, so commonly made use of in the reports of local registrars, unless there is other evidence that the dis- ease referred to was typhus properly so-called. In the old nosological arrangement of the Registrar-General of England (still in use in Scotland, although rejected in this country), " typhus" is used as a synonym of continued fever. In the new arrangement adopted here, consistently with nosological " " more recent researches, the terms typhus", typhoid", and " relapsing" are made use of in place of the common designa- tion of continued fever; but in the official instructions to medical men for the registration of deaths, typhus is still directed to be used as the generic term of continued fever.
[Show full text]