DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 1996 / Rules

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 1996 / Rules Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 1996 / Rules and Regulations 2705 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: tailplanes if the outside air temperatures 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to Andrew Gfrerer, Aerospace Engineer, are above +5 degrees Celsius on a location where the requirements of this AD Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM± approach. Ice sublimation, melting, and can be accomplished. 130L, FAA, Transport Airplane shedding are not only functions of (e) This amendment supersedes priority temperature, but also are dependent letter AD 94±11±11, issued June 23, 1994. Directorate, Los Angeles Aircraft (f) This amendment becomes effective on Certification Office, 3960 Paramount upon other factors such as the nature, February 13, 1996. Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712; size, and extent of ice accretion; Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on telephone (310) 627±5338; fax (310) operation of ice protection systems; time January 11, 1996. 627±5210. of flight in temperatures above freezing; Jay J. Pardee, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A and airplane speed. proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal The commenter's concern regarding Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, incurring a flap extension limitation Aircraft Certification Service. Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) after encountering, and then departing, [FR Doc. 96±1410 Filed 1±26±96; 8:45 am] icing conditions has merit. However, the BILLING CODE 4910±13±U that is applicable to various General Dynamics (Convair) airplanes was airplane must be free of ice before the published in the Federal Register on flaps are extended to greater than 30 degrees. Since ice can accrete on 14 CFR Part 39 June 16, 1995 (60 FR 31648). That action proposed to require revising the FAA- tailplanes with a small leading edge [Docket No. 95±NM±19±AD; Amendment radius when there is no evidence of ice approved Airplane Flight Manual 39±9501; AD 96±03±04] accretion on the wings, a method of (AFM) to require that the flight crew visual inspection of the wings, limit the flap settings during certain Airworthiness Directives; General tailplanes, and/or proven ice detectors icing conditions and air temperatures. Dynamics (Convair) Model 240 Series or ice evidence probes would be Interested persons have been afforded Airplanes, Including Model T±29 necessary to assure clean surfaces. (Military) Airplanes; Model 340 and 440 an opportunity to participate in the One commenter requests that the Series Airplanes; and Model C±131 making of this amendment. Due proposed AD be withdrawn. The (Military) Airplanes; Including Those consideration has been given to the commenter states that the airplane can Modified for Turbo-Propeller Power comments received. be operated quite safely within the One commenter supports the environment to which it is certified AGENCY: Federal Aviation proposed rule. when the anti-icing system is Administration, DOT. One commenter supports the operational and functioning, and when ACTION: Final rule. proposed rule, but believes that an that system is used in the manner in allowance should be made for using a which it was intended. SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a setting of greater than flaps 30 after new airworthiness directive (AD), The FAA does not concur with the icing conditions have been encountered commenter's request. Test pilots of applicable to various General Dynamics if outside air temperatures in the (Convair) airplanes, that requires Convair Model 5800 series airplanes landing area are well above freezing. actually experienced evidence of ice revising the Airplane Flight Manual to The commenter indicates that icing contaminated tailplane stall (ICTS) require that the flight crew limit the flap conditions may be encountered at during pushover maneuver flight tests. settings during certain icing conditions cruising altitudes, but the ground (Model 5800 series airplanes are similar and air temperatures. This amendment temperatures could be much warmer. to Model 340 series airplanes equipped is prompted by reports indicating that The commenter believes that there is with turbo-prop engines.) For this incidents involving uncommanded virtually no chance that ice would reason the type certificate holder agreed pitch excursions have occurred due to remain on the tail. From the with the FAA that a flap extension ice contaminated tailplane stall (ICTS) commenter's experience, all ice that has restriction during operation in icing that occurred during or following flight collected on the wing leading edges, conditions is necessary. The specific in icing conditions. If flap settings are engine nacelles, windscreens, and flight test used to determine increased for landing when conditions windshield wipers will have susceptibility to ICTS is a pushover for ICT S are present, elevator control disappeared by the time the indicating maneuver to generate an increased angle could be affected adversely and the outside air temperature has reached +5 of attack on the horizontal tailplane. airplane could descend uncontrollably. degrees Celsius on descent. This maneuver is performed with ice The actions specified by this AD are In light of these remarks, the shapes on the tailplane and flaps in intended to ensure that the flight crew commenter suggests that the AFM approach and landing positions, at is advised of the potential hazard revision required by paragraph (a) of the speeds from near approach to maximum related to increasing the flap settings proposed rule be reworded as follows: for the configurations. The test when conditions for ICTS are present, ``Flap selection is limited to a procedure requires a push force and the procedures necessary to address maximum of 30 degrees after icing throughout the maneuver to zero load it. conditions have been encountered if the factor. A force reversal would be EFFECTIVE DATE: February 28, 1996. indicated OAT on approach is +5 indicative of an elevator hinge moment ADDRESSES: Information pertaining to degrees Celsius or lower; or if icing reversal caused by airflow separation this rulemaking action may be examined conditions are anticipated during due to accreted ice and an increased at the Federal Aviation Administration approach and landing; or when the angle of attack due to pitch rate, and (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, outside air temperature is +5 degrees would define the aircraft as susceptible Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Celsius or below and any visible to ICTS. Because all affected Convair Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Los moisture is present.'' airplane models have tailplane designs Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, The FAA does not concur with the that are similar to the model tested, this Transport Airplane Directorate, 3960 commenter's suggestion. Operators AD requires a flap limitation. Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, cannot generally assume that accreted The FAA has revised this final rule to California. ice will not be present on wings and clarify that the unsafe condition 2706 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 19 / Monday, January 29, 1996 / Rules and Regulations specified in this AD can occur if the flap Administrator, the Federal Aviation Issued in Renton, Washington, on January settings are increased when conditions Administration amends part 39 of the 23, 1996. for ICTS are present. Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Darrell M. Pederson, After careful review of the available part 39) as follows: Acting Manager, Transport Airplane data, including the comments noted Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. above, the FAA has determined that air PART 39ÐAIRWORTHINESS [FR Doc. 96±1517 Filed 1±26±96; 8:45 am] safety and the public interest require the DIRECTIVES BILLING CODE 4910±13±U adoption of the rule as proposed. 1. The authority citation for part 39 There are approximately 282 Model continues to read as follows: 240 series airplanes, including Model 14 CFR Part 39 T±29 (military) airplanes; Model 340 Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. [Docket No. 95±CE±88±AD; Amendment 39± and 440 series airplanes; Model C±131 § 39.13 [Amended] 9500; AD 95±24±10] (military) airplanes, and those models 2. Section 39.13 is amended by modified for turbo-propeller power; of adding the following new airworthiness Airworthiness Directives; Michelin the affected design in the worldwide directive: Aircraft Tire Corporation Part Number fleet. The FAA estimates that 197 028±520±1 (22x5.75±12/10PR) Tires airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected 96±03±04 General Dynamics (Convair): Installed on the Main Landing Gear of by this AD, that it will take Amendment 39±9501. Docket 95±NM± 19±AD. Airplanes approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and Applicability: All Model 240 series AGENCY: Federal Aviation airplanes, including Model T±29 (military) Administration, DOT. that the average labor rate is $60 per airplanes; Model 340 and 440 series work hour. Based on these figures, the airplanes; and Model C±131 (military) ACTION: Final rule; request for cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators airplanes; including those models modified comments. is estimated to be $11,820, or $60 per for turbo-propeller power (commonly airplane. referred to as Model 580, 600, and 640 series SUMMARY: This document publishes in The cost impact figure discussed airplanes); certificated in any category. the Federal Register an amendment above is based on assumptions that no Compliance: Required as indicated, unless adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD) operator has yet accomplished any of accomplished previously. 95±24±10, which was sent previously to To ensure that the flight crew is advised of all known U.S. owners and operators of the requirements of this AD action, and the potential hazard associated with that no operator would accomplish increasing the flap settings when ice airplanes with a Michelin Aircraft Tire those actions in the future if this AD contaminated tailplane stall (ICTS) Corporation part number (P/N) 028± were not adopted.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Aviation Administration Joint Aircraft System/Component Code Table and Definitions
    FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION JOINT AIRCRAFT SYSTEM/COMPONENT CODE TABLE AND DEFINITIONS INFORMATION LAST UPDATED October 27, 2008 PREPARED BY FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION FLIGHT STANDARDS SERVICE REGULATORY SUPPORT DIVISION AVIATION DATA SYSTEMS BRANCH, AFS-620 MIKE MONRONEY AERONAUTICAL CENTER OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73125 JOINT AIRCRAFT SYSTEM/COMPONENT CODE TABLE PREFACE The Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code Table is a modified version of the Air Transport Association of America (ATA), Specification 100 code. It was developed by the FAA's, Regulatory Support Division (AFS-600). Over the years, the JASC code format of the ATA Spec 100 code has gained widespread industry acceptance. In a harmonized effort, the FAA’s counterparts in Australia and Canada have adopted the JASC code with only a few exceptions. Some Canadian aircraft manufacturers have also adopted this new standard. This code table is constructed by using the new JASC code four (4) digit format, along with an abbreviated code title. The abbreviated titles have been modified in some cases to clarify the intended use of the accompanying code. This table can be used as a quick reference chart, to assist in the coding and review of aircraft structures or systems data (i.e., Service Difficulty Report (SDR), Accident/Incident Report (AID)). The current coding scheme used in the JASC code was introduced in May 1991, for the technical classification of SDR’s. Its predecessor, the FAA aircraft system/component code, is a similar but more complex eight-digit code, which was developed over 25 years ago. It was constructed around the computer technology of that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Conceptis Presented
    /OW5/_-7//)-_5°7 77 NASA Technical Memorandum 85777 NASA-TM-85777 19840014485 ¢1 DEVELOPMENTANDANALYSISOFA STOL SUPERSONICCRUISEFIGHTERCONCEPT SAMUEL M, DOLLYHIGH,WILLARD E,Foss,JR,, SHELBY J, MORRIS,JR,,KENNETH B, WALKLEY, E,E, SWANSON, AND A,WARNER ROBINS UOT TO I_F.I'A._'I,[ YRG..'_'i!LqJ llCO;_ MARCH1984 National Aeronautics and I.J,NGLEYRESEARCH,._-_'_rER Space Administration LIBRARY, NAqA Langley Research Center I-L\..'.:PIO;'_,VIRGIIqlA Hampton,Virginia23665 TABLEOF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY.................................. 1 PARTI -" INTRODUCTION........................... 2 PARTII - CONFIGURATIONDESCRIPTION.................... 4 PARTIII - PROPULSIONSYSTEM ....................... 14 PARTIV - MASSPROPERTIES......................... 16 PARTV - AERODYNAMICDESIGNANDANALYSIS ................. 20 PARTVI - CONFIGURATIONSIZING AND PERFORMANCEANALYSIS.......... 69 CONCLUDINGREMARKS............................ 82 SUMMARY - The applicationof advancedand emergingtechnologiesto a fighteraircraft conceptis presented. The concept,which is referredto as the twin-boomfighter - (TBF-1),relieson a two-dimensionalvectoring/reversingnozzleto provideSTOL performancewhile also achievingefficientlong range supersoniccruise. A key feature is that the propulsionpackageis placedso that the nozzlehinge line is near the aircraftcenter-of-gravityto allow largevectorangles and, thus, provide large valuesof directlift while minimizingthe momentsto be trimmed. The confi- gurationname is derivedfrom the long twin boomsextendingaft of the engineto the twin verticaltails
    [Show full text]
  • Airframe Log Entry Piper 32RT-300T
    Aircraft Record General Information M•nufacturer _j?_,_~ ..,P="~r'-------- Model '3.2 ~T ~oT -. ..r ial '32~ - 'J~~ '7 \ :1.~' _______ ____ Registration Num ber >-.lc....li '-~~A D11tc of M•nufacture _ ___________ ____ _______~ -------- - -- I nqlne(s) currently installed: Mmlufacturer ~,_,tP""""'"~--"--;"'--'-'--'~i------- Model l.:L D- ~t..to~ S~A D Serial j)..L. -3.~7 5 - b \ iAi. M11nufacturer ___ ________ Model Serial ___ l,ropeller(s) currently installed: M.1nufacturer _\.i~w~+~-z.~c._\ \'-----------Model HC--i= 3. '-? ~ - 1. ~~ HUD Model ___________ Serial £M__i3_Q_\ ~-~- _ Serial "'·•de Model ___________ Serial _____ Serial ______ Serial m .. de M odel ___________ Serial ___ _ Serial Serial _______ MAKE PIPER ~ !'-,.,.,,.,, HIGH PERFORMANCE AIRCRAFT, INC. DAT E 11912012 MODEL PA-32RT-300T Ne TSN 3699 12 :1 Alterations SIN 32R-7887121 Repaor Station No HPFR569X 3676 07 REG NO 428RA 1850 JOE CROSSON DRIVE TACH ate Number of WORK ORDER El CaJOO CA 92020 5527--09-20 11 Phone 858-576-5000 pecific entries. ) Airframe Entries PERFORMED AN ANNUAL INSPECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAR PART 43, APPENDIX 0 . USING CURRENT PIPER PA32RT-301T {LANCE II) INSPECTION REPORT PIN 230-953 AS A GUIDE. ALL AD'S CHECKED THRU REV 2011 -27, SEE ATIACHED LIST COMPLIED WITH AD 2009-02-03, DATED FEBRUARY 9, 2009 (TO PREVENT A LEAN RUNNING ENGINE. WHICH COULD RESULT IN A SUBSTANTIAL LOSS OF ENGINE POWER AND SUBSTANTIAL, CNTD)-8130 FORM DATED 812712008 SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH AD 2008-06-51 "G" IS ST AMPED ON HEX PLUG NO FURTHER ACTION REQUIRED COMPLIED WITH AD 80-14-03.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Forum
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT Vol. 42, No. 3, May–June 2005 Design Forum DESIGN FORUM papers range from design case studies to presentations of new methodologies to speculations about emerging design trends. They vary from 2500 to 12,000 words (where a figure or table counts as 200 words). Following informal review by the Editors, they may be published within a few months of the date of receipt. Style requirements are the same as for regular contributions (see inside back cover). Design and Development of the HondaJet Michimasa Fujino∗ Honda R&D Americas, Inc., Greensboro, North Carolina 27409 The HondaJet is an advanced, lightweight, business jet featuring an extra large cabin, high fuel efficiency, and high cruise speed compared to existing small business jets. To achieve the high-performance goals, an over- the-wing engine-mount configuration, a natural-lamina-flow wing, and a natural-laminar-flow fuselage nose were developed through extensive analyses and wind-tunnel tests. The wing is metal, having an integral, machined skin to achieve the smooth upper surface required for natural laminar flow. The fuselage is constructed entirely of composites; the stiffened panels and the sandwich panels are cocured integrally in an autoclave to reduce weight and cost. The prototype aircraft has been designed and fabricated. Major ground tests such as structural proof tests, control-system proof test, system function tests, and ground-vibration tests have been completed. The first flight was conducted on 3 December 2003, and flight testing is currently underway. The aerodynamic, aeroelastic, structural, and systems designs and tests conducted during the development are described Introduction propriate criteria were derived from flight tests.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Aircraft Construction
    CHAPTER 4 AIRCRAFT BASIC CONSTRUCTION INTRODUCTION useless. All materials used to construct an aircraft must be reliable. Reliability minimizes the possibility of Naval aircraft are built to meet certain specified dangerous and unexpected failures. requirements. These requirements must be selected so they can be built into one aircraft. It is not possible for Many forces and structural stresses act on an one aircraft to possess all characteristics; just as it isn't aircraft when it is flying and when it is static. When it is possible for an aircraft to have the comfort of a static, the force of gravity produces weight, which is passenger transport and the maneuverability of a supported by the landing gear. The landing gear absorbs fighter. The type and class of the aircraft determine how the forces imposed on the aircraft by takeoffs and strong it must be built. A Navy fighter must be fast, landings. maneuverable, and equipped for attack and defense. To During flight, any maneuver that causes meet these requirements, the aircraft is highly powered acceleration or deceleration increases the forces and and has a very strong structure. stresses on the wings and fuselage. The airframe of a fixed-wing aircraft consists of the Stresses on the wings, fuselage, and landing gear of following five major units: aircraft are tension, compression, shear, bending, and 1. Fuselage torsion. These stresses are absorbed by each component of the wing structure and transmitted to the fuselage 2. Wings structure. The empennage (tail section) absorbs the 3. Stabilizers same stresses and transmits them to the fuselage.
    [Show full text]
  • Piper Arrow Questionnaire
    RFC Dallas, Inc. AIRCRAFT QUESTIONNAIRE Version 2; March 12, 2019 Name: ___________________________________________ Date:______________ Aircraft: Arrow Model: PA-28R-200 Registration Number: N1125T Answer the following questions by using the information contained in this aircraft’s Pilot’s Operating Handbook, the current Weight and Balance supplement, placards affixed to the aircraft, the RFC Checklist, and the FARS/AIM. After being reviewed by a Club Checkout Instructor, this questionnaire must be submitted to the RFC Dallas Inc. Safety Officer before solo flights may be conducted. 1. What is the maximum allowable gross weight for this aircraft? _________ lbs. 2. What is the current basic empty weight and moment arm for this aircraft? _________ lbs., __________ inches. 3. How much additional payload weight can be carried assuming maximum fuel on board? _____ lbs. 4. At maximum gross weight, what is the forward C.G. limit? ______ inches. 5. At maximum gross weight, what is the rearward C.G. limit? _____ inches. 6. What is the maximum weight in the Baggage Compartment? _________lbs. 7. The rated HP of the engine at 2700 RPM is: _______HP? 8. What is the fuel capacity: a) Total ________ gals; b) Usable ________ gals. 9. What is the typical grade of aviation fuel approved for use in this aircraft? Octane ____________ / Color ________ 10. During the preflight inspection, there are _______ fuel drains to sump. 11. The proper main strut inflation should be ________inches. The proper nose strut inflation should be ________ inches. 12. Upon an “Alternator Failure” condition, the pilot should: a. __________________________________ b. __________________________________ 1 c.
    [Show full text]
  • A350 Aircraft Characteristics Airport and Maintenance Planning Ac
    @AIRBUS A350 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING AC The content of this document is the property of Airbus. It is supplied in confidence and commercial security on its contents must be maintained. It must not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied, nor may information contained in it be disclosed to unauthorized persons. It must not be reproduced in whole or in part without permission in writing from the owners of the copyright. Requests for reproduction of any data in this document and the media authorized for it must be addressed to Airbus. © AIRBUS S.A.S. 2005. All rights reserved. AIRBUS S.A.S. Customer Services Technical Data Support and Services 31707 Blagnac Cedex FRANCE Issue: Nov 01/16 Rev: Jul 01/21 @A350 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS - AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING HIGHLIGHTS Revision No. 10 - Jul 01/21 LOCATIONS CHG DESCRIPTIONS OF CHANGE CODE CHAPTER 2 Section 2-1 Subject 2-1-0 General Aircraft Characteristics Data R CHAPTER 7 Section 7-9 Subject 7-9-0 ACN/PCN Reporting System - Flexible R and Rigid Pavements CHAPTER 10 Section 10-0 Subject 10-0-0 FIGURE Front Page R FIGURE Front Page R HIGHLIGHTS Page 1 Jul 01/21 @A350 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS - AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING LIST OF EFFECTIVE CONTENT Revision No. 10 - Jul 01/21 CONTENT CHG LAST REVISION CODE DATE CHAPTER 1 Subject 1-1-0 Introduction Jun 01/19 Subject 1-2-0 Glossary Sep 01/19 CHAPTER 2 Subject 2-1-0 General Aircraft Characteristics Data R Jul 01/21 Subject 2-2-0 General Aircraft Dimensions Apr 01/21 FIGURE
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd – University of Kansas
    Overseer Pedro Toledo AIAA Member Number: 655253 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Ronald Barrett AIAA Member Number: 022393 ii O E S The need for top of the line aircraft has always been a priority in the United States armed forces. Historically, new aircraft for the military have been introduced at a quickened pace. With the sociopolitical forces in recent decades, this trend has slowed down. This can be seen in the date of introduction for the last fi ve members of the fi ghter, F, family: F-35 in 2015, F-22 in 2005, F/A-18 E/F in 1995, F/A-18A/B in 1983, F-16 in 1978, and the F-15 in 1976. Similar trends are found in transport, bombers, air support, and trainer aircraft. With a fl eet of aging airframes, the feasibility of continuously upgrading Cold War-era aircraft with cutting-edge technology is slowly becoming impractical. The purpose of this report is to introduce the A-X Overseer as a replacement to the Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II. Preliminary sizing, Class I, and Class II design are presented in this design report. The design process started with preliminary weight, wing, and powerplant sizing. Input from A-10 pilots, fl ight line crew, and ground forces that work alongside the aircraft were consulted. A sweep of potential confi gurations was undertaken for a fi nal selection. Once a fi nal confi guration was selected, Class I and Class II design methods from Jan Roskam’s Airplane Design series were performed. The defi ning feature of the A-X Overseer is the use of the Coandă eff ect through upper surface blowing and a side-mounted cannon.
    [Show full text]
  • 1.3.0.12 ECCAIRS Aviation Data Definition Standard
    ECCAIRS Aviation 1.3.0.12 Data Definition Standard English Attribute Values ECCAIRS Aviation 1.3.0.12 V4 CD Descriptive Factors Aerodrome generally (Aerodrome generally) 40000000 Aerodrome generally: The part played by aerodrome factors in the occurrence. Aerodrome as a structure (Aerodrome as a structure) 41000000 Apron/ramp as an entity (Apron/ramp as an entity) 41300000 N.B. Apron and ramp are synonymous for a defined area, on a land aerodrome, intended to accommodate aircraft for purposes of loading or unloading passengers, mail or cargo, fuelling, parking or maintenance.(Annex 14) Aircraft parking position/gate (Aircraft parking position/gate) 100000118 Apron/ramp congestion (Apron/ramp congestion) 41300200 Apron/ramp obstruction (Apron/ramp obstruction) 41300100 Apron/ramp surface condition (Apron/ramp surface condition) 41300400 Apron/ramp braking action (Apron/ramp braking action) 41300500 Apron/ramp surface state (Apron/ramp surface state) 41300300 Runway as an entity (Runway as an entity) 41100000 Runway. A defined rectangular area on a land aerodrome prepared for the landing and take-off of aircraft. Annex 14. Runway approach obstructions (Approach obstructions) 41100500 All fixed (whether temporary or permanent) and mobile objects that extend above a defined surface intended to protect aircraft in flight. Runway arresting gear (Runway arresting gear) 41100900 Any equipment installed on or after the runway intended to arrest / stop the aircraft. Engineered materials arrestor system (EMAS) (Engineered materials arrestor system 100000120 (EMAS)) An engineered bed of lightweight, crushable concrete built at the end of a runway. Runway safety net (Runway safety net) 100000119 Runway clearway (Runway clearway) 100000056 A defined rectangular area on the ground or water under the control of the appropriate authority, selected or prepared as a suitable area over which an aeroplane may make a portion of its initial climb to a specified height.
    [Show full text]
  • A319 Aircraft Characteristics Airport and Maintenance Planning Ac
    @AIRBUS A319 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING AC The content of this document is the property of Airbus. It is supplied in confidence and commercial security on its contents must be maintained. It must not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied, nor may information contained in it be disclosed to unauthorized persons. It must not be reproduced in whole or in part without permission in writing from the owners of the copyright. Requests for reproduction of any data in this document and the media authorized for it must be addressed to Airbus. © AIRBUS S.A.S. 2005. All rights reserved. AIRBUS S.A.S. Customer Services Technical Data Support and Services 31707 Blagnac Cedex FRANCE Issue: Jul 01/95 Rev: Dec 01/20 @A319 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS - AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING HIGHLIGHTS Revision No. 23 - Dec 01/20 LOCATIONS CHG DESCRIPTIONS OF CHANGE CODE HIGHLIGHTS Page 1 Dec 01/20 @A319 AIRCRAFT CHARACTERISTICS - AIRPORT AND MAINTENANCE PLANNING LIST OF EFFECTIVE CONTENT Revision No. 23 - Dec 01/20 CONTENT CHG LAST REVISION CODE DATE CHAPTER 1 Subject 1-1-0 Purpose Nov 01/19 Subject 1-2-0 Glossary Dec 01/17 CHAPTER 2 Subject 2-1-1 General Aircraft Characteristics Data May 01/14 Subject 2-2-0 General Aircraft Dimensions May 01/14 FIGURE General Aircraft Dimensions - Wing Tip Fence Feb 01/18 FIGURE General Aircraft Dimensions May 01/15 Subject 2-3-0 Ground Clearances May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Wing Tip Fence Dec 01/18 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Sharklet Dec 01/18 FIGURE Ground Clearances Dec 01/18 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Trailing Edge Flaps - Extended May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Flap Tracks - Extended May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Flap Tracks - Retracted May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Flap Tracks - 1 + F May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Aileron Down May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Aileron Up May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Spoilers - Extended May 01/15 FIGURE Ground Clearances - Leading Edge Slats - Extended May 01/15 Subject 2-4-1 L.E.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation Maintenance Alerts
    ADVISORY CIRCULAR 43-16A AVIATION MAINTENANCE ALERTS ALERT JUNE NUMBER 2006 335 CONTENTS AIRPLANES BEECH ........................................................................................................................................1 BOMBARDIER...........................................................................................................................1 CESSNA ......................................................................................................................................3 DIAMOND ..................................................................................................................................8 GRUMMAN ................................................................................................................................8 LEAR .........................................................................................................................................10 MOONEY..................................................................................................................................11 PILATUS ...................................................................................................................................11 PIPER.........................................................................................................................................11 HELICOPTERS GARLICK (BELL) ....................................................................................................................12 SIKORSKY................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Piper PA-23-250 Azte
    THE PILOT'S OPERATING MANUAL BY PIPER This manual is incomplete without an APPROPR lATE FAA APPROVED AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL and an APPROPRIATE WEIGHT AND BALANCE REPORT. ,. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS DESCRIPTION - AIRPlANE AHD SYSTEMS fliGHT MANUAl FAA APPROVED .•. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES FAA APPROVED - EMERGENCY PROCEDURES WEIGHT AND BALANCE OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS OPERATING TIPS PREFORMANCE CHARTS HANDLING AND SERVICING () >: ~ 0z (J"; GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS ·-· GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS Performance . .. Altitude Cruising Speeds (mph) ............ · ........................ Weights . 2 Power Plant . 2 Fuel And Oil . 2 Baggage . 3 Dimensions . 3 Landing Gear . 3 AZTEC .. E" GENERAL SPEClFlCATlONS PERFORMANCE Published figures are for Standard PA-23-250 airplanes flown at gross weight under stondard conditions at sea level unless otherwise stated. Performance for a specific airplane may vary fror:J published figures depending upon the equipment installed, the condition of engines. airplane and equipr:1ent. atmospheric conditions and piloting technique. Normally Turbo Aspirated Ch2rged Take-off Run (max effort) (ft) 820 820 Take-off Distance Over 50-ft Barrier (max effort) (ft) 1250 1250 Accelerate-Stop Distance (ft) 2220 22~0 Minimum Controllable Single Engine Speed (mph)/(knots) 80 (69.5) 80 (69.5) Stalling Speed (gear down, flaps down so•) (power off) (mph)/(knots) 70 (61) 70 (61) Stalling Speed (gear and flaps up) (power ofi) (mph)/(knots) 76 (66) 76 (66) Best Rate of Climb (ft per min) 1490 1530 Best Rate of Oimb Speed (mph)/( knots) 120(102)
    [Show full text]