DOCSLIB.ORG

Teaching and Learning About Child Rights: a Study of Implementation in 26 Countries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Teaching and Learning About Child Rights: a Study of Implementation in 26 Countries QUB & UNICEF MARCH 2015 CHILD RIGHTS EDUCATION STUDY 1 © LEE JEROME Teaching and learning about child rights: A study of implementation in 26 countries Lee Jerome, Lesley Emerson, Laura Lundy and Karen Orr unite for children CHILD RIGHTS EDUCATION QUB & UNICEF MARCH 2015 2 STUDY This research was commissioned and funded by the Advocacy and Child Rights Education Unit at the UNICEF Private Fundraising and Partnerships Division, Geneva. This baseline research undertaken by the Centre for Children’s Rights in Queens’ University Belfast contributes to the global debate on child rights education. The statements expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or the views of UNICEF. They are published in order to stimulate further dialogue on issues affecting children. For further information about this project contact: Lee Jerome Centre for Children’s Rights School of Education Queen’s University Belfast [email protected] Marie Wernham Advocacy and Child Rights Education Unit UNICEF Private Fundraising and Partnerships Division Geneva [email protected] Cover translation: ‘Children have the right to protection from exploitation and abuse’, Albert-Schweitzer-Schule, Germany QUB & UNICEF MARCH 2015 CHILD RIGHTS EDUCATION STUDY 3 CHILD RIGHTS EDUCATION QUB & UNICEF MARCH 2015 4 STUDY CONTENTS Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Executive summary ......................................................................................................................... 8 Curriculum ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Teacher education ........................................................................................................................... 9 Monitoring and quality assurance ................................................................................................... 9 Participation .................................................................................................................................... 9 Literature review ........................................................................................................................... 10 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 10 What is child rights education? ..................................................................................................... 10 What do we know about the impact of CRE? .............................................................................. 12 What do we know about the implementation of CRE? ................................................................ 13 What do we know about the role of educators? .......................................................................... 15 Where does CRE fit? .................................................................................................................... 17 Who promotes CRE? .................................................................................................................... 18 Ideology, context and meanings ................................................................................................... 18 Summary....................................................................................................................................... 21 Findings from the survey .............................................................................................................. 22 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 22 Overview....................................................................................................................................... 22 Survey themes .............................................................................................................................. 24 Theme 1: Learning about, through and for rights ................................................................... 24 Theme 2: Teacher education ................................................................................................... 27 Theme 3: Networks and influencers ....................................................................................... 28 Theme 4: Access to resources ............................................................................................... 29 Country summaries ...................................................................................................................... 30 Australia ................................................................................................................................... 30 Austria ..................................................................................................................................... 31 Belgium ................................................................................................................................... 31 Canada .................................................................................................................................... 32 Denmark .................................................................................................................................. 32 Finland ..................................................................................................................................... 33 France ...................................................................................................................................... 33 Germany .................................................................................................................................. 34 Hong Kong ............................................................................................................................... 34 Hungary ................................................................................................................................... 35 Iceland ..................................................................................................................................... 35 Ireland ...................................................................................................................................... 36 Israel ........................................................................................................................................ 36 QUB & UNICEF MARCH 2015 CHILD RIGHTS EDUCATION STUDY 5 Italy .......................................................................................................................................... 37 New Zealand ........................................................................................................................... 37 Norway .................................................................................................................................... 38 Poland ...................................................................................................................................... 38 Republic of Korea .................................................................................................................... 39 Scotland................................................................................................................................... 39 Slovakia ................................................................................................................................... 40 Slovenia ................................................................................................................................... 40 Spain ........................................................................................................................................ 41 Sweden ................................................................................................................................... 41 Switzerland .............................................................................................................................. 42 The Netherlands ...................................................................................................................... 42 USA ......................................................................................................................................... 43 Findings from case studies .......................................................................................................... 44 Belgium case study: planning a teacher education strategy ........................................................ 44 Finland case study: building relationships to implement CRE ...................................................... 50 France case study: making the most of new opportunities ......................................................... 52 Germany case study: nurturing quality CRE in one area .............................................................. 54 Hong Kong case study: the role of research in evidence-informed advocacy ............................. 56 Israel case study: connecting top-down and bottom-up developments ...................................... 58 Scotland case study: bottom-up CRE through the Rights Respecting Schools Award (RRSA) .. 60 Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Bank and Gaza 2020 Human Rights Report
    WEST BANK AND GAZA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Palestinian Authority basic law provides for an elected president and legislative council. There have been no national elections in the West Bank and Gaza since 2006. President Mahmoud Abbas has remained in office despite the expiration of his four-year term in 2009. The Palestinian Legislative Council has not functioned since 2007, and in 2018 the Palestinian Authority dissolved the Constitutional Court. In September 2019 and again in September, President Abbas called for the Palestinian Authority to organize elections for the Palestinian Legislative Council within six months, but elections had not taken place as of the end of the year. The Palestinian Authority head of government is Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh. President Abbas is also chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization and general commander of the Fatah movement. Six Palestinian Authority security forces agencies operate in parts of the West Bank. Several are under Palestinian Authority Ministry of Interior operational control and follow the prime minister’s guidance. The Palestinian Civil Police have primary responsibility for civil and community policing. The National Security Force conducts gendarmerie-style security operations in circumstances that exceed the capabilities of the civil police. The Military Intelligence Agency handles intelligence and criminal matters involving Palestinian Authority security forces personnel, including accusations of abuse and corruption. The General Intelligence Service is responsible for external intelligence gathering and operations. The Preventive Security Organization is responsible for internal intelligence gathering and investigations related to internal security cases, including political dissent. The Presidential Guard protects facilities and provides dignitary protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU
    The London School of Economics and Political Science Making EU Foreign Policy towards a ‘Pariah’ State: Consensus on Sanctions in EU Foreign Policy towards Myanmar Arthur Minsat A thesis submitted to the Department of International Relations of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, June 2012 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorization does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 97,547 words. Statement of use of third party for editorial help I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Dr. Joe Hoover. 2 Abstract This thesis seeks to explain why the European Union ratcheted up restrictive measures on Myanmar from 1991 until 2010, despite divergent interests of EU member states and the apparent inability of sanctions to quickly achieve the primary objectives of EU policy. This empirical puzzle applies the ‘sanctions paradox’ to the issue of joint action in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Factsheet: Promoting Freedom of Religion Or Belief Within the United
    UNITED STATES COMMISSION on INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM FACTSHEET October 2020 UN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM Gayle Manchin Promoting Freedom of Religion or Belief within the United Nations Chair Human Rights System Tony Perkins Vice Chair By Kirsten Lavery, Supervisory Policy Analyst Anurima Bhargava Vice Chair Pursuant to the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA), the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) monitors freedom of religion or Commissioners belief abroad using international human rights standards, including the Universal Gary Bauer Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and James W. Carr Political Rights (ICCPR). Within the United Nations (UN) system, there are a variety of charter and treaty-based mechanisms with mandates that address international Frederick A. Davie human rights issues according to the same standards. This factsheet describes Nadine Maenza those mechanisms, with a particular focus on those most relevant to freedom of Johnnie Moore religion or belief. Although these bodies have various imperfections and limitations, Nury Turkel they nevertheless provide opportunities for advocacy by and collaboration among states and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) working to promote religious freedom internationally. Erin D. Singshinsuk Executive Director UN Human Rights Focused Mechanisms Charter-Based Mechanisms: UN charter-based mechanisms are mandated through resolutions of the principal organs of the UN that were established by the UN Charter. USCIRF’s Mission Currently, the charter-based human rights mechanisms are the Human Rights Council (HRC) and its subsidiaries. HRC: The HRC is an inter-governmental body of 47 member states that was To advance international established in 2006 by General Assembly Resolution 60/251 as a subsidiary body to the UN General Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Peace Prize
    TITLE: Learning From Peace Makers OVERVIEW: Students examine The Dalai Lama as a Nobel Laureate and compare / contrast his contributions to the world with the contributions of other Nobel Laureates. SUBJECT AREA / GRADE LEVEL: Civics and Government 7 / 12 STATE CONTENT STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS: -Identify, research, and clarify an event, issue, problem or phenomenon of significance to society. -Gather, use, and evaluate researched information to support analysis and conclusions. OBJECTIVES: The student will demonstrate the ability to... -know and understand The Dalai Lama as an advocate for peace. -research and report the contributions of others who are recognized as advocates for peace, such as those attending the Peace Conference in Portland: Aldolfo Perez Esquivel, Robert Musil, William Schulz, Betty Williams, and Helen Caldicott. -compare and contrast the contributions of several Nobel Laureates with The Dalai Lama. MATERIALS: -Copies of biographical statements of The Dalai Lama. -List of Nobel Peace Prize winners. -Copy of The Dalai Lama's acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize. -Bulletin board for display. PRESENTATION STEPS: 1) Students read one of the brief biographies of The Dalai Lama, including his Five Point Plan for Peace in Tibet, and his acceptance speech for receiving the Nobel Prize for Peace. 2) Follow with a class discussion regarding the biography and / or the text of the acceptance speech. 3) Distribute and examine the list of Nobel Peace Prize winners. 4) Individually, or in cooperative groups, select one of the Nobel Laureates (give special consideration to those coming to the Portland Peace Conference). Research and prepare to report to the class who the person was and why he / she / they won the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICLES in ACTION the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in the UK School Context
    ARTICLES IN ACTION The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child in the UK school context. Unicef/Fields ABOUT THIS RESOURCE ▪ This resource illustrates how the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) can provide a powerful framework to help articulate a Slides 3 to 6 give more school’s vision, aims, ethos and everyday practice, alongside providing a details about the CRC common language that can be used by all stakeholders within the school and the school context. community. ▪ The resource focusses on the first 42 articles of the CRC (articles 43- Slide 7 explains how to 54 are about how adults and governments must work together to make sure all children can enjoy all their rights). use this resource. ▪ For each article some examples of links between the CRC article and the school context have been made in terms of the school’s strategic Slide 8 is an interactive work and with regard to pupil’s learning and engagement with the table of articles 1-42 wider world. followed by an individual slide for each ▪ Please note, whilst the Convention is relevant to all school settings (nursery, primary & secondary; mainstream and specialist provision) article. some of the suggested links may not be applicable for pupils of particular ages or school settings and therefore should be checked in advance by teachers before their use. © Unicef Rights Respecting Schools 2019 EVERY CHILD HAS RIGHTS... ▪ Every child has rights, whatever their ethnicity, gender, religion, language, abilities or any other status. ▪ The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (the Convention or CRC) is the most complete statement of children’s rights ever produced and is the most widely-ratified international human rights treaty in history.
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Action Global
    Grants & Charitable contributions, Fees and sponsorships to Patient Advocacy Organisations and Groups 2020 Global Positive Action Expenditure Amount Organisation Name Project Description Website (GBP) Access Youth Initiative Uganda Improving uptake of PMTCT and HIV services in Gomba District £ 7,913 n/a Action communautaire pour le Bien être de De l'enfant au jeune adulte : grandir et vivre avec le VIH £ 11,054 www.lesassos.com/sn/aBEFAB/ l'Enfant et de la Femme au Burkina Action for Community Driven Development Empowering communities to accelerate the momentum in eMTCT of £ 9,533 n/a (ACODDEV) HIV Action for Research and Development Adolescents Health Access £ 9,124 www.aford.or.ke (AFORD) Combating COVID-19 related Challenges in “Save me HIV /AIDS Action for Sustainable Development Malawi £ 20,000 www.asudvelop.org Prevention Project” “Adam’s Love We Care for HIV and COVID-19” Leveraging Adam’s Love Global Foundation for MSM and communication technology for ensuring seamless HIV support services £ 20,000 www.adamslove.org/ Transgender Health (ALGO) to MSM living with HIV and help overcome challenges during COVID-19 crisis Strengthening community responses on prevention and care for PLHIV Adhara, Asociación VIH/sida £ 19,993 n/a during the COVID-19 emergency crisis. ADPP Mozambique Improving detection and care of the missing CLHIV and young girls (Centro de Investigação Operacional da Beira £ 130,329 www.adpp-mozambique.org/ needing PMTCT (CIOB)) Africare Healthy Babies Countdown to Zero in Viana £ 49,216 www.africare.org/ Experts Clients
    [Show full text]
  • 1 June 8, 2020 to Members of The
    June 8, 2020 To Members of the United Nations Human Rights Council Re: Request for the Convening of a Special Session on the Escalating Situation of Police Violence and Repression of Protests in the United States Excellencies, The undersigned family members of victims of police killings and civil society organizations from around the world, call on member states of the UN Human Rights Council to urgently convene a Special Session on the situation of human rights in the United States in order to respond to the unfolding grave human rights crisis borne out of the repression of nationwide protests. The recent protests erupted on May 26 in response to the police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which was only one of a recent string of unlawful killings of unarmed Black people by police and armed white vigilantes. We are deeply concerned about the escalation in violent police responses to largely peaceful protests in the United States, which included the use of rubber bullets, tear gas, pepper spray and in some cases live ammunition, in violation of international standards on the use of force and management of assemblies including recent U.N. Guidance on Less Lethal Weapons. Additionally, we are greatly concerned that rather than using his position to serve as a force for calm and unity, President Trump has chosen to weaponize the tensions through his rhetoric, evidenced by his promise to seize authority from Governors who fail to take the most extreme tactics against protestors and to deploy federal armed forces against protestors (an action which would be of questionable legality).
    [Show full text]
  • Conditions and Challenges Experienced by Human Rights Defenders in Carrying out Their Work
    Conditions and challenges experienced by human rights defenders in carrying out their work: Findings and recommendations of a fact-finding mission to Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories carried out by Forefront and by the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) and the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) in their joint programme the Observatory for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders Table of contents Paragraphs Executive Summary A. Mission’s rationale and objectives 1-4 B. The delegation’s composition and activities • Composition 5 • Programme 6-12 • Working methods 13-14 C. The environment in which human rights NGOs operate • Upholding human rights in a context of armed conflict and terrorism 15-23 • Freedom of association: Issues relating to human rights NGO’s registration and funding 24-34 • Freedom of expression of human rights defenders 35-37 • Restrictions on freedom of movement affecting the work of human rights NGOs 38-43 • Conditions experienced by the international human rights organisations 44-46 • The NGOs section of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the State of Israel 47-50 D. Main issues that human rights NGOs address • Upholding international humanitarian law in a context of occupation 51-55 • Protecting persons in administrative detention and opposing any forms of torture and ill-treatment 56-61 • Upholding the right to defence and due process of law 62-70 • Opposing house demolitions in the OPTs as collective punishment and ill-treatment 71-72 • Fighting for the dismantlement of Israeli settlements and opposing land-seizure in the OPTs 73-75 E. Specific risks to which human rights defenders are exposed • Physical risks and security hazards faced by human rights defenders in Israel and the OPTs 76-77 • Detention and ill-treatment of human rights defenders: The case of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Albert Schweitzer: a Man Between Two Cultures
    , .' UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I LIBRARY ALBERT SCHWEITZER: A MAN BETWEEN TWO CULTURES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN LANGUAGES AND LITERATURES OF • EUROPE AND THE AMERICAS (GERMAN) MAY 2007 By Marie-Therese, Lawen Thesis Committee: Niklaus Schweizer Maryann Overstreet David Stampe We certify that we have read this thesis and that, in our opinion, it is satisfactory in scope and quality as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Languages and Literatures of Europe and the Americas (German). THESIS COMMITIEE --~ \ Ii \ n\.llm~~~il\I~lmll:i~~~10 004226205 ~. , L U::;~F H~' _'\ CB5 .H3 II no. 3Y 35 -- ,. Copyright 2007 by Marie-Therese Lawen 1II "..-. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS T I would like to express my deepest gratitude to a great number of people, without whose assistance, advice, and friendship this thesis w0l!'d not have been completed: Prof. Niklaus Schweizer has been an invaluable mentor and his constant support have contributed to the completion of this work; Prof. Maryann Overstreet made important suggestions about the form of the text and gave constructive criticism; Prof. David Stampe read the manuscript at different stages of its development and provided corrective feedback. 'My sincere gratitude to Prof. Jean-Paul Sorg for the the most interesting • conversations and the warmest welcome each time I visited him in Strasbourg. His advice and encouragement were highly appreciated. Further, I am deeply grateful for the help and advice of all who were of assistance along the way: Miriam Rappolt lent her editorial talents to finalize the text; Lynne Johnson made helpful suggestions about the chapter on Bach; John Holzman suggested beneficial clarifications.
    [Show full text]
  • ICAI Commission for Aid Impact
    Independent ICAI Commission for Aid Impact Evaluation of DFID’s work through United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Terms of Reference Introduction 1.1 The Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) is the independent body responsible for scrutinising UK aid. We focus on maximising the effectiveness of the UK aid budget for intended beneficiaries and on delivering value for money for UK taxpayers. We carry out independent reviews of aid programmes and of issues affecting the delivery of UK aid. We publish transparent, impartial and objective reports to provide evidence and clear recommendations to support UK Government decision-making and to strengthen the accountability of the aid programme. Our reports are written to be accessible to a general readership and we use a simple „traffic light‟ system to report our judgement on each programme or topic we review. 1.2 We wish to evaluate DFID‟s work through and relationship with the United Nations Children‟s Fund (UNICEF). In particular, we propose to evaluate the relationship with UNICEF as a delivery partner through a review of programmes that UNICEF is managing on behalf of DFID. We will concentrate on UNICEF‟s work on the ground, delivering services on behalf of DFID, whilst also considering briefly the management relationship between DFID and UNICEF headquarters. These Terms of Reference outline the purpose and nature of the review and identify the main themes that it will investigate. A detailed methodology will be developed during an inception phase. 2. Background 2.1. DFID‟s view, set out in the Multilateral Aid Review (MAR), is that „UNICEF has a critical role in delivering DFID and HMG development and humanitarian priorities‟.1 In 2011, UNICEF spent $3.8 billion and worked in more than 150 countries.2 DFID‟s International Relations Division provided it with core funding totalling £165 million between 2005 and 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Bolstering the UN Human Rights Council's Effectiveness
    DISCUSSION PAPER Bolstering the UN Human Rights Council’s Effectiveness Mark P. Lagon Ryan Kaminski January 2017 This publication is part of the International Institutions and Global Governance program and was made possible by the generous support of the Robina Foundation. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and promi- nent thinkers come together with CFR members to discuss and debate major international issues; sup- porting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce arti- cles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to-date infor- mation and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org. The Council on Foreign Relations takes no institutional positions on policy issues and has no affiliation with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2012
    © Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights – LBI and Research Association A-1010 Vienna, Freyung 6 (Schottenhof), Hof 1, Stiege II T +43/1/42 77-274 20, [email protected], http://bim.lbg.ac.at Vienna, April 2013 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 20 Years Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights. 20 Years Committed to Human Rights Research. ..................................................................................................... 7 Human Dignity and Public Security .................................................................................... 9 Human Rights in Development Cooperation and Business / Digital Rights ................................................................................................... 11 European Neighbourhood and Integration Policy ........................................................... 14 Anti-Discrimination | Diversity | Asylum .......................................................................... 17 Women‘s Rights | Children‘s Rights | Trafficking in Human Being ............................... 19 Human Rights Education and Education for Democratic Citizenship .......................... 22 Staff ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Finances .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]