UCLA the Docket
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UCLA The Docket Title The Docket Vol. 51 No. 5 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7nm80349 Journal The Docket, 51(5) Author UCLA Law School Publication Date 2003-03-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW. VOLUME 51, NUMBER 5 405 H1LGARD AVENUE, Los ANGELES, CA 90095. MARCH 2003 UCL tudent Take a tand Marky Keaton I was writing to the Supreme Court. In 3L stead, I realized for the first time that I was writing what I felt. I and my con As many of you are aware, in the patriots were addressing the severe harm next couple of months the Supreme Court caused to a large number of students at will decide the fate ofaffirmative action our school. It is this harm that we be in this country in Grutter v. Bollinger lieve must be faced head-on instead of ("Grutter"). Our class was in a unique hidden in the background. position as we were part of the first gen In the.process, we learned things that eration of students to be admitted and were both touching, disturbing, and in educated in California without race-con spirational. Several students in SCARE scious admissions policies. We were the worked on soliciting testimonials for the first victims of Proposition 209 _and · brief from other UC law students. The could personally attest to the detrimen response from students at Berkeley, tal effect of the proposition on all stu Hastings, and Davis was overwhelming, dents at the UCLA School of Law and powerful, and immP.diate. These stu other similarly situated California insti dents, representatives of countless races tutions. and cultures, told tragic tales of courage The process began when 3L in the midst of insurmountable odds. Rasheda Kilpatrick brought a coalition They all demonstrated heroism in. the of students together from many unique truest sehse-pursufi!g their dre.ams for a backgrounds and cultures tp figure put · Angela Mooney-D'Arcy Marky Keaton Erika Woods Amara Andrews Rasheda better world in the center of academic how a voice could be given to those who Kilpatrick, Steve Kwon, Jennifer Ro, Jennifer Lai, and Marisol Arriagea institutions determined to convince them . had_ heretofore been silenced by the ments .. Tediot1s deadline.~ .. Waif,. did I cated core g~oup thatwas determined to . that their problems are all figments of formulistic and impersonal natureofle . mention that you alse> _have to ,have;an .• I gettliis donetl 1J:teigrotip' was•notjust .. · ,their.irnagirlation. ~E!r,~_.;were,~i.J,nply,too gal educatfon. FroinJhese mo'des(be.:. attorney certi.fied to argue before the Su-. students. It also iridiided legal profes- many to publish;and fuepr~cess of edit ginnings Students of Color Against prerne Court submit the brief on your siona_ls and faculty members who took . ing them to meet our page-limit was a Resegregation di Education ("SCARE") behalf. Oh, and one more thing, from the great time anci care to·review and make thankless task that broke all of our was born. From all this, it was decided moment we first met as a group until the suggestions on our work product.. It in- hearts. that we would write the Supreme Court time we had to meet the final filing dead- valved sleepless nights, skipping class In addition to tl1ese student state directly and file a brief as amici curiae line in Grutter, we had only two weeks. (most of which I hardly ever bother to ments, the brief also outlined several le (friend of the Court) in Grutter. · Itwas nice to learn that democracy was attend anymore, having realized the stig- gal justifications for race-conscious ad Let me just say that filing a brief in alive and well and that anyone with lots ma tic effect the environment was hav- missions policies. Desegregation ctDd the Supreme Court is no small task. The of money, a sophisticated legal staff, and ing on me), intense arguments over style diversity.are compelling state interests. process, like most things related to the a personal connection to the highest level and substance, and for me, a powerful, Resegregated schools like UCLA and law, is purposefully designed to keep of American jurisprudence was more profound, and mildly sad revelation that Berkeley cause unimaginable harm to all normal human beings from thinking they thanwelcometofileabriefwiththeCourt. thiswastheonlydocumentl'veworked students who enroll in them that can could ever do it. Expensive fees. Con I?on'taskmehowwedidit-thatwas on since I enrolled in law school that I neverbeadequatelyremedied. Oursoci sent requirements. Standing require- the work of an incredibly large and dedi- actually cared about. It was not because See AMICUS, page 10 WHAT'S INSIDE The $880 Candy Bowl Letter to Firm·····~·····•·.•·············~···············•·.•················· 2 2 Shelley Cobos ness Manager, I knew that we had thou- . Sander Responds ............... ,........................................ 3L sands of dollars in surplus. I could not' Interview Story .......... :................ ;:······························ 3 understand why the dues were being "Unsubstantiated Rumor" ....................................... 3 Ah, the joys of being a member of the raised. I was ·puzzled as to where this Barrister's Ball ............................................................ -3 most prestigious law journal at the law number came from, especially in light of Supporting Soldiers ............................................ :...... 4 school! As a member, you get to spend the fact that I had not yet created a bud all semester writing a 30-page comment get. Obviously, this decision was made Adventures in Bar Review ........................................ 4 that will be outdated by the time you him without the guidance of a budget. "Why Comics ..................................... 4, 6, 10, 12; 13, 14, 18 it in or by the time it is published; you get would we need all of this money?," I North Korea ..... :....................... ;.................................. 5 to do numerous cite checks following asked myself. 5 Bluebookrules, ·accurately dubbed" an When I inquired, the chief decision- Lack of Diversity· .............. .-·........................................... anal retentive wet dream" by one anony . maker of the dues increase responded, Drinking and Walking ............................................. 5 mous author; and, last but not least, you "[W]e didn't feel it necessary to do cal 11 Hell ............... :.. _...... ;................................................ 6 ·get to pay dues of $70 for tl1e "honor" of culations this year because the previous Writing for The Docket., .................... :......................... 6 being a member! SEVENTY DOLLARS class had already weighed between $70 . Bar Destination: China .............................................. 7 you say? To be a member of this organi and $60 dues based on the consideration · ·v· 1 · R · t. · , . · 7 zation? That's what I said! And I was of whether or not to eliminate the candy 1va a es1s ance ..................... '. ........................... _... .. the Business Manager! You know, the bowl. They eliminated it, and we restored -In.the Know ....................................... ~ ......................... 7· one in charge of the budget and the dues it." While I was wondering .who this Lost in La Mancha ....................................................... 8 account. With 88 members paying $70, "we" was, I struggled to recover from my Law Review: Write-on, Written-off ........................ 8 that's $6,160. But where does all that surprise at the justification for the in money go? Let's explore that issue. crease - $10 x 88 members = $880 for PILF Auction .......... :................................................... 13 At the beginning of the year before candy! That's a helluva a lot of candy! -FYI: LLM in ADR ....... :............................................. 17 our organization held an all-members Even though the chief decision Moot Court Winners .. ;........... ~ .... :................. ~ .......... 18 meeting, I was surprised to learn that maker referred _to a distinctive "we," I Entertainment Oscar Review ................................. 19 dues were going to be raised to $70. The prior year the dues were $60 and, as Busi- See CANDY, page 11 PAGE 2 MARCH 2003·-' UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW T1rn DqcKET .... .•:·•::.f·t":•>i}·•-'W-··~}:lflff~9H?.\. Phatkaats, Midul_aged & Boulding, LLP. 4 Your Inphoah Way · • .. · ,}.;:%,;/.•·.·.··•.;\: ;•·)•--·~o's·~1119¾n1gcr?ckcU1d\vljya,r~fl't.theycsl1aringZ1:hefe.is_.·.·•• Lu Sir Ville, CA 12345 iI);'~, ·>·,;:\ ·'ci-pr9p~~.tl.q11.tlle,.tabl~that~omeofyoumay:11ot~eaw.1reo£-,i.·to•·•·· .-•. [t)·r ?l' •Iiave,_OCII?th~Weikbefore·schoolbegfo~! Becctusesumrner break.'••. !M; ~l¾~~~;;tftl)tt~~rit'.?''"d~~h<rra Dear Phatkaats and Associates: Thank you for responding to my inquiry in as little as two months. I am .· .. ·.•·.·.·· .·• .•. •.·.. ' OKgang,yesitis a pain in.the•ass to dec:1lwith.dasses and . ?fil? at the sarnf tirrle. Brt this' irlconve,~~hce is. a. trifle com ecstatic to learn that you find my resume quasi-impressive. I understand that pared to th.e sl;tort-cornings of 111ovm,g OCIP up. taking time away from your billable minutes to communicate with me is a ~reat sacrifice. Hence, I sincerely appreciate the millisecond of interest you pre . } .· •... First, -~~e sanity component. Yoµ NEED to wo;k 01" s.ome'." •thing over the summ~r but you al.so NEED a.few days to get back tended to take in me. to LA, get settled, and complete the pre-reading