DOCSLIB.ORG

UCLA the Docket

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UCLA The Docket Title The Docket Vol. 51 No. 5 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7nm80349 Journal The Docket, 51(5) Author UCLA Law School Publication Date 2003-03-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW. VOLUME 51, NUMBER 5 405 H1LGARD AVENUE, Los ANGELES, CA 90095. MARCH 2003 UCL tudent Take a tand Marky Keaton I was writing to the Supreme Court. In­ 3L stead, I realized for the first time that I was writing what I felt. I and my con­ As many of you are aware, in the patriots were addressing the severe harm next couple of months the Supreme Court caused to a large number of students at will decide the fate ofaffirmative action our school. It is this harm that we be­ in this country in Grutter v. Bollinger lieve must be faced head-on instead of ("Grutter"). Our class was in a unique hidden in the background. position as we were part of the first gen­ In the.process, we learned things that eration of students to be admitted and were both touching, disturbing, and in­ educated in California without race-con­ spirational. Several students in SCARE scious admissions policies. We were the worked on soliciting testimonials for the first victims of Proposition 209 _and · brief from other UC law students. The could personally attest to the detrimen­ response from students at Berkeley, tal effect of the proposition on all stu­ Hastings, and Davis was overwhelming, dents at the UCLA School of Law and powerful, and immP.diate. These stu­ other similarly situated California insti­ dents, representatives of countless races tutions. and cultures, told tragic tales of courage The process began when 3L in the midst of insurmountable odds. Rasheda Kilpatrick brought a coalition They all demonstrated heroism in. the of students together from many unique truest sehse-pursufi!g their dre.ams for a backgrounds and cultures tp figure put · Angela Mooney-D'Arcy Marky Keaton Erika Woods Amara Andrews Rasheda better world in the center of academic how a voice could be given to those who Kilpatrick, Steve Kwon, Jennifer Ro, Jennifer Lai, and Marisol Arriagea institutions determined to convince them . had_ heretofore been silenced by the ments .. Tediot1s deadline.~ .. Waif,. did I cated core g~oup thatwas determined to . that their problems are all figments of formulistic and impersonal natureofle­ . mention that you alse> _have to ,have;an .• I gettliis donetl 1J:teigrotip' was•notjust .. · ,their.irnagirlation. ~E!r,~_.;were,~i.J,nply,too gal educatfon. FroinJhese mo'des(be.:. attorney certi.fied to argue before the Su-. students. It also iridiided legal profes- many to publish;and fuepr~cess of edit­ ginnings Students of Color Against prerne Court submit the brief on your siona_ls and faculty members who took . ing them to meet our page-limit was a Resegregation di Education ("SCARE") behalf. Oh, and one more thing, from the great time anci care to·review and make thankless task that broke all of our was born. From all this, it was decided moment we first met as a group until the suggestions on our work product.. It in- hearts. that we would write the Supreme Court time we had to meet the final filing dead- valved sleepless nights, skipping class In addition to tl1ese student state­ directly and file a brief as amici curiae line in Grutter, we had only two weeks. (most of which I hardly ever bother to ments, the brief also outlined several le­ (friend of the Court) in Grutter. · Itwas nice to learn that democracy was attend anymore, having realized the stig- gal justifications for race-conscious ad­ Let me just say that filing a brief in alive and well and that anyone with lots ma tic effect the environment was hav- missions policies. Desegregation ctDd the Supreme Court is no small task. The of money, a sophisticated legal staff, and ing on me), intense arguments over style diversity.are compelling state interests. process, like most things related to the a personal connection to the highest level and substance, and for me, a powerful, Resegregated schools like UCLA and law, is purposefully designed to keep of American jurisprudence was more profound, and mildly sad revelation that Berkeley cause unimaginable harm to all normal human beings from thinking they thanwelcometofileabriefwiththeCourt. thiswastheonlydocumentl'veworked students who enroll in them that can could ever do it. Expensive fees. Con­ I?on'taskmehowwedidit-thatwas on since I enrolled in law school that I neverbeadequatelyremedied. Oursoci­ sent requirements. Standing require- the work of an incredibly large and dedi- actually cared about. It was not because See AMICUS, page 10 WHAT'S INSIDE The $880 Candy Bowl Letter to Firm·····~·····•·.•·············~···············•·.•················· 2 2 Shelley Cobos ness Manager, I knew that we had thou- . Sander Responds ............... ,........................................ 3L sands of dollars in surplus. I could not' Interview Story .......... :................ ;:······························ 3 understand why the dues were being "Unsubstantiated Rumor" ....................................... 3 Ah, the joys of being a member of the raised. I was ·puzzled as to where this Barrister's Ball ............................................................ -3 most prestigious law journal at the law number came from, especially in light of Supporting Soldiers ............................................ :...... 4 school! As a member, you get to spend the fact that I had not yet created a bud­ all semester writing a 30-page comment get. Obviously, this decision was made Adventures in Bar Review ........................................ 4 that will be outdated by the time you him without the guidance of a budget. "Why Comics ..................................... 4, 6, 10, 12; 13, 14, 18 it in or by the time it is published; you get would we need all of this money?," I North Korea ..... :....................... ;.................................. 5 to do numerous cite checks following asked myself. 5 Bluebookrules, ·accurately dubbed" an When I inquired, the chief decision- Lack of Diversity· .............. .-·........................................... anal retentive wet dream" by one anony­ . maker of the dues increase responded, Drinking and Walking ............................................. 5 mous author; and, last but not least, you "[W]e didn't feel it necessary to do cal­ 11 Hell ............... :.. _...... ;................................................ 6 ·get to pay dues of $70 for tl1e "honor" of culations this year because the previous Writing for The Docket., .................... :......................... 6 being a member! SEVENTY DOLLARS class had already weighed between $70 . Bar Destination: China .............................................. 7 you say? To be a member of this organi­ and $60 dues based on the consideration · ·v· 1 · R · t. · , . · 7 zation? That's what I said! And I was of whether or not to eliminate the candy 1va a es1s ance ..................... '. ........................... _... .. the Business Manager! You know, the bowl. They eliminated it, and we restored -In.the Know ....................................... ~ ......................... 7· one in charge of the budget and the dues it." While I was wondering .who this Lost in La Mancha ....................................................... 8 account. With 88 members paying $70, "we" was, I struggled to recover from my Law Review: Write-on, Written-off ........................ 8 that's $6,160. But where does all that surprise at the justification for the in­ money go? Let's explore that issue. crease - $10 x 88 members = $880 for PILF Auction .......... :................................................... 13 At the beginning of the year before candy! That's a helluva a lot of candy! -FYI: LLM in ADR ....... :............................................. 17 our organization held an all-members Even though the chief decision­ Moot Court Winners .. ;........... ~ .... :................. ~ .......... 18 meeting, I was surprised to learn that maker referred _to a distinctive "we," I Entertainment Oscar Review ................................. 19 dues were going to be raised to $70. The prior year the dues were $60 and, as Busi- See CANDY, page 11 PAGE 2 MARCH 2003·-' UCLA SCHOOL OF LAW T1rn DqcKET .... .•:·•::.f·t":•>i}·•-'W-··~}:lflff~9H?.\. Phatkaats, Midul_aged & Boulding, LLP. 4 Your Inphoah Way · • .. · ,}.;:%,;/.•·.·.··•.;\: ;•·)•--·~o's·~1119¾n1gcr?ckcU1d\vljya,r~fl't.theycsl1aringZ1:hefe.is_.·.·•• Lu Sir Ville, CA 12345 iI);'~, ·>·,;:\ ·'ci-pr9p~~.tl.q11.tlle,.tabl~that~omeofyoumay:11ot~eaw.1reo£-,i.·to•·•·· .-•. [t)·r ?l' •Iiave,_OCII?th~Weikbefore·schoolbegfo~! Becctusesumrner break.'••. !M; ~l¾~~~;;tftl)tt~~rit'.?''"d~~h<rra Dear Phatkaats and Associates: Thank you for responding to my inquiry in as little as two months. I am .· .. ·.•·.·.·· .·• .•. •.·.. ' OKgang,yesitis a pain in.the•ass to dec:1lwith.dasses and . ?fil? at the sarnf tirrle. Brt this' irlconve,~~hce is. a. trifle com­ ecstatic to learn that you find my resume quasi-impressive. I understand that pared to th.e sl;tort-cornings of 111ovm,g OCIP up. taking time away from your billable minutes to communicate with me is a ~reat sacrifice. Hence, I sincerely appreciate the millisecond of interest you pre­ . } .· •... First, -~~e sanity component. Yoµ NEED to wo;k 01" s.ome'." •thing over the summ~r but you al.so NEED a.few days to get back tended to take in me. to LA, get settled, and complete the pre-reading
Recommended publications
  • Patriotic Cheers Shac.Org/Patriotic-Theme

    Patriotic Cheers Shac.Org/Patriotic-Theme

    Patriotic Cheers shac.org/patriotic-theme Cut out cheers and put in a cheer box. Find more cheers and instructions to make a cheer box at shac.org/cheers. America Cheer Eagle Applause Firecracker Cheer Shout A-M-E-R-I-C-A Grab imaginary match from back Lock thumbs, pocket, and light imaginary (3 times), Cub Scouts, flutter fingers like wings, firecracker held in the other USA! shout "Cree, cree!" hand, throw it on the ground, make noise like fuse "sssss", then yell loudly "BANG, BANG, BANG!" Fireworks Cheer Flag Cheer Flag Wave Everyone stands, points upward Pretend to raise the flag by Do the regular “wave” where one and shouts, “Skyrocket! Whee!” alternately raising hands over the group at a time starting from one (then whistle), then yell head and “grasping” the rope to side, waves – but announce that it’s a Flag Wave in honor of our Flag. “Boom! Boom!” pull up the flag. Then stand back, salute and say “Ahhh!” Fourth of July Cheer Liberty Bell Yell Rocket Cheer Stand up straight and Ding, Ding, Ding, Dong! Squat down slowly shout "The rockets red Let freedom ring! saying, “5-4-3-2-1” and glare!" then yell, BLAST OFF! And jump into the air. Patriotic Cheer Mount New Citizen Cheer To recognize the hard work of Shout “U.S.A!” and thrust hand learning in order to pass the test with doubled up fist skyward Rushmore Cheer to become a new citizen, have while shouting “Hooray for the Washington, Jefferson, everyone stand, make a salute, Red, White and Blue!” Lincoln, Roosevelt! and say “We salute you!” Soldier Cheer Statue of Liberty USA-BSA Cheer Stand at attention and Cheer One group yells, “USA!” The salute.
  • An Analysis of Hegemonic Social Structures in "Friends"

    An Analysis of Hegemonic Social Structures in "Friends"

    "I'LL BE THERE FOR YOU" IF YOU ARE JUST LIKE ME: AN ANALYSIS OF HEGEMONIC SOCIAL STRUCTURES IN "FRIENDS" Lisa Marie Marshall A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2007 Committee: Katherine A. Bradshaw, Advisor Audrey E. Ellenwood Graduate Faculty Representative James C. Foust Lynda Dee Dixon © 2007 Lisa Marshall All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Katherine A. Bradshaw, Advisor The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze the dominant ideologies and hegemonic social constructs the television series Friends communicates in regard to friendship practices, gender roles, racial representations, and social class in order to suggest relationships between the series and social patterns in the broader culture. This dissertation describes the importance of studying television content and its relationship to media culture and social influence. The analysis included a quantitative content analysis of friendship maintenance, and a qualitative textual analysis of alternative families, gender, race, and class representations. The analysis found the characters displayed actions of selectivity, only accepting a small group of friends in their social circle based on friendship, gender, race, and social class distinctions as the six characters formed a culture that no one else was allowed to enter. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project stems from countless years of watching and appreciating television. When I was in college, a good friend told me about a series that featured six young people who discussed their lives over countless cups of coffee. Even though the series was in its seventh year at the time, I did not start to watch the show until that season.
  • Blacks Reveal TV Loyalty

    Blacks Reveal TV Loyalty

    Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT Advertising Age November 18, 1991 Blacks reveal TV loyalty SECTION: MEDIA; Media Works; Tracking Shares; Pg. 28 LENGTH: 537 words While overall ratings for the Big 3 networks continue to decline, a BBDO Worldwide analysis of data from Nielsen Media Research shows that blacks in the U.S. are watching network TV in record numbers. "Television Viewing Among Blacks" shows that TV viewing within black households is 48% higher than all other households. In 1990, black households viewed an average 69.8 hours of TV a week. Non-black households watched an average 47.1 hours. The three highest-rated prime-time series among black audiences are "A Different World," "The Cosby Show" and "Fresh Prince of Bel Air," Nielsen said. All are on NBC and all feature blacks. "Advertisers and marketers are mainly concerned with age and income, and not race," said Doug Alligood, VP-special markets at BBDO, New York. "Advertisers and marketers target shows that have a broader appeal and can generate a large viewing audience." Mr. Alligood said this can have significant implications for general-market advertisers that also need to reach blacks. "If you are running a general ad campaign, you will underdeliver black consumers," he said. "If you can offset that delivery with those shows that they watch heavily, you will get a small composition vs. the overall audience." Hit shows -- such as ABC's "Roseanne" and CBS' "Murphy Brown" and "Designing Women" -- had lower ratings with black audiences than with the general population because "there is very little recognition that blacks exist" in those shows.
  • Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico

    Historical Range of Variability and Current Landscape Condition Analysis: South Central Highlands Section, Southwestern Colorado & Northwestern New Mexico William H. Romme, M. Lisa Floyd, David Hanna with contributions by Elisabeth J. Bartlett, Michele Crist, Dan Green, Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, J. Page Lindsey, Kevin McGarigal, & Jeffery S.Redders Produced by the Colorado Forest Restoration Institute at Colorado State University, and Region 2 of the U.S. Forest Service May 12, 2009 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY … p 5 AUTHORS’ AFFILIATIONS … p 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS … p 16 CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION A. Objectives and Organization of This Report … p 17 B. Overview of Physical Geography and Vegetation … p 19 C. Climate Variability in Space and Time … p 21 1. Geographic Patterns in Climate 2. Long-Term Variability in Climate D. Reference Conditions: Concept and Application … p 25 1. Historical Range of Variability (HRV) Concept 2. The Reference Period for this Analysis 3. Human Residents and Influences during the Reference Period E. Overview of Integrated Ecosystem Management … p 30 F. Literature Cited … p 34 CHAPTER II. PONDEROSA PINE FORESTS A. Vegetation Structure and Composition … p 39 B. Reference Conditions … p 40 1. Reference Period Fire Regimes 2. Other agents of disturbance 3. Pre-1870 stand structures C. Legacies of Euro-American Settlement and Current Conditions … p 67 1. Logging (“High-Grading”) in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 2. Excessive Livestock Grazing in the Late 1800s and Early 1900s 3. Fire Exclusion Since the Late 1800s 4. Interactions: Logging, Grazing, Fire, Climate, and the Forests of Today D. Summary … p 83 E. Literature Cited … p 84 CHAPTER III.
  • Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service

    Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service

    Responses of Plant Communities to Grazing in the Southwestern United States Department of Agriculture United States Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station Daniel G. Milchunas General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-169 April 2006 Milchunas, Daniel G. 2006. Responses of plant communities to grazing in the southwestern United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-169. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 126 p. Abstract Grazing by wild and domestic mammals can have small to large effects on plant communities, depend- ing on characteristics of the particular community and of the type and intensity of grazing. The broad objective of this report was to extensively review literature on the effects of grazing on 25 plant commu- nities of the southwestern U.S. in terms of plant species composition, aboveground primary productiv- ity, and root and soil attributes. Livestock grazing management and grazing systems are assessed, as are effects of small and large native mammals and feral species, when data are available. Emphasis is placed on the evolutionary history of grazing and productivity of the particular communities as deter- minants of response. After reviewing available studies for each community type, we compare changes in species composition with grazing among community types. Comparisons are also made between southwestern communities with a relatively short history of grazing and communities of the adjacent Great Plains with a long evolutionary history of grazing. Evidence for grazing as a factor in shifts from grasslands to shrublands is considered. An appendix outlines a new community classification system, which is followed in describing grazing impacts in prior sections.
  • MISCELANEA 60.Indb

    MISCELANEA 60.Indb

    FRASIER: A CULTURAL HISTORY Joseph J. Darowski and Kate Darowski Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017 ROBERT MURTAGH Universidad de Almería [email protected] 177 Part of independent publisher Rowman & Littlefield’s “Cultural History of Television” series that (according to their website) “will focus on iconic television shows” from the 1950s to the present that have had a lasting impact on world culture, Frasier: A Cultural History joins a collection of extant publications on defining sitcoms such as Mad Men, Breaking Bad and Star Trek. The authors of the text in question, Joseph J. Darowski and Kate Darowski, are self-confessed Frasier fans with a background in different ambits of cultural study (the former as editor of the “Ages of Superheroes” essay series and author of X-Men and the Mutant Metaphor: Race and Gender in the Comic Books and the latter having researched the history of decorative arts and design). Above all, they share a mutual appreciation for all things Crane. From a structural perspective, the book is divided into two parts: “Part I: Making A Classic” and “Part II: Under Analysis”. Each section is further subdivided into four separate topics. The first deals with: the evolution of Cheers to the emergence of Frasier Crane; the story behind the eclectic cast; character profiles of Frasier, Niles, Martin and Eddy; and finally, a discussion of Daphne and Roz. The second part, as the name suggests, is more academically inclined with chapters examining ongoing character development in the Crane household; an in-depth look at Frasier’s apartment from structural and aesthetic perspectives, as well as in contrast to Niles’s home at the Montana; an analysis of set decoration, particularly chairs; and lastly, the representation of women, gender and race.
  • Sydney Program Guide

    Sydney Program Guide

    4/9/2020 prtten04.networkten.com.au:7778/pls/DWHPROD/Program_Reports.Dsp_ONE_Guide?psStartDate=12-Apr-20&psEndDate=25-Apr-… SYDNEY PROGRAM GUIDE Sunday 12th April 2020 06:00 am Home Shopping (Rpt) Home Shopping 06:30 am Home Shopping (Rpt) Home Shopping 07:00 am Home Shopping (Rpt) Home Shopping 07:30 am Key Of David PG The Key of David, a religious program, covers important issues of today with a unique perspective. 08:00 am Star Trek (Rpt) PG Is There In Truth No Beauty? Jealousy is the catalyst for murder when the Enterprise picks up two imprortant guests: an alien ambassador whose appearance drives humans mad, and his female companion, the lovely telepath Miranda. Starring: William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Deforest Kelley, James Doohan, Nichelle Nichols, George Takei, Walter Koenig Guest Starring: Diana Muldaur 09:00 am Star Trek (Rpt) PG Spectre Of The Gun As punishment for ignoring their warning and violating Melkotian space, Kirk and his landing party are condemned to the losing side of a surreal recreation of the historic gunfight at the OK Corral. Starring: William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Deforest Kelley, James Doohan, Nichelle Nichols, Walter Koenig Guest Starring: Ron Soble, Bonnie Beecher 10:00 am Shark Tank (Rpt) CC PG First in the tank is a 33-year-old looking for investment in her food business, Be Fit Food. Next, 3 mates pitch their Beer Pal app. Finally, will the Sharks bite on a motorcycle adventure business? 11:00 am Escape Fishing With ET (Rpt) CC G Escape with Andrew Ettingshausen as he travels Australia and the Pacific, hunting out the most exciting species, the most interesting spots and the most fun mates to go fishing with.
  • •Now Pitcbincj: Sam Malone• Written by Ken Levine, David Isaacs

    •Now Pitcbincj: Sam Malone• Written by Ken Levine, David Isaacs

    , CBDRS •Now PitcbincJ: Sam Malone• 160591-016 Written By Ken Levine, David Isaacs Created and Developed By James Burrows Glen Charles Les Charles Return to Script Department PARAMOUNT PIC'l'traES CORPORATION PINAL DRAFT 5555 Melrose Avenue Hollywood, California 90038 December 9, 1982 CBEBRS •Now Pitcbin91 ~ SAM MALONE ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• DD DANSON DIANE CBAMBERS ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SBBLLBY LONG COACH ERNll PANTUSSO ••••• •••••••••••••••••• NICX COLASANTO CARLA TORffLLI • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • RHEA PERLMAN CI.IPF • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. • JORN' RA'tZENBERGER NORM. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • GEORGB 1IENDT LANA MARSHALL •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• BARBARA BABCOCK TIBOR SVE'l'KOVIC. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • RICX BILL PAUL.. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •.• • • PAOL VAUGHN LUIS TIANT ••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • BIMSBLF DIRECTOR ••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••• • ••• nrr. BAR INT. SAM'S OFFICE CHBBRS •Nov Pitching: Sam Malone• .. TEASER -X FADE IN: INT. BAR - CLOSING TIME SAM AND COACH ARE CLOSING tJP. AS THEY HEAD FOR THE DOOR, COACH STOPS AND LOOKS AROUND. COACH Y'know Sam, this is my favorite time of day. SAM Closing time, Coach? COACH No, 1:37. SOmething about it, I don't know ••• SAM Yeah, it's nice. Everybody's probably got their favorite 1:37 story. 2. (X) 1eah. What time of day do you like, S&m? SAM Gee, I don't Jcnow ••• 8115'• nice. COACH I used to like 8:15, but I kinda outgrew it. AS THBY 'l'ALK, SAM 'l'tJRNS 00'1' THE LIGHTS. 'l'BBY GO 00'1' 'l'HB DOOR, UP '1'BB S'l'EPS AND DISAPPEAR. AP'l'ER A BEA'l' NORM COMES ROSSING QY! OP 'l'HB BATHROOM. NORM Wait a minute, I ••• BB STOPS, A THOOGH'l' OCCURS TO HIM. HE LOOKS AROUND,; GOES OVER AND TtJRNS ON 'l'HE TV.
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Where credit is due: cultural practices of recorded music Jansen, B. Publication date 2011 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Jansen, B. (2011). Where credit is due: cultural practices of recorded music. Eigen Beheer. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:05 Oct 2021 WhereCredit is Due Music Recorded of Practices Cultural BasJansen Where Credit is Due: Cultural Practices of Recorded Music. Bas Jansen Bas Jansen Where Credit is Due: Cultural Practices of Recorded Music. This research was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scienctific Research (NWO) and was part of the research project “Sound Technologies and Cultural Practices”. Printed by Proefschrift Maken / BOXPress BV, Oisterwijk Layout: Alyanne de Haan Cover front based on a picture by K.
  • Cheers Or Jeers by Reg P. Wydeven January 24, 2016

    Cheers Or Jeers by Reg P. Wydeven January 24, 2016

    Cheers or Jeers By Reg P. Wydeven January 24, 2016 A few weeks ago, the Kimberly High School basketball program honored the 1991 team that qualified for the State Tournament. To commemorate the 25th anniversary of our trip to State, they held a ceremony between the JV and varsity games. Flanked by the current players, my buddies and I walked out to the center of Jack Wippich Court as the PA announcer recounted the highs and lows of that memorable season. After the game, we went to Tanners to continue the celebration. We told old stories for the 1,000th time and laughed until our faces hurt. I recalled the time during our junior year that we played Fox Valley Lutheran in a junior reserve game on a Saturday morning. I loved playing FVL because they utilized a 2-3 zone, so that opened up 3-point shots. Sure enough, early in the game I was wide open for a 3. Apparently I was so excited that when I launched it, the shot came up about a foot short. The half-dozen or so students at the game immediately began chanting “Airball, airball!” For the rest of the game, the fans resumed the chant each time I touched the ball. I was reluctant to jack up another shot out of fear of further ridicule. Thankfully, my love for shooting outweighed my fear of humiliation, so I kept shooting. A quarter century later, that handful of fans could get in trouble for picking on me. In case you haven’t heard, last month the WIAA sent out an email to member schools reminding them about the organization’s policy about sportsmanship and student section chants directed at opponents that “are clearly intended to disrespect.” The email, sent by director of communication Todd Clark, included examples of such chants, such as “You can’t do that,” “Fundamentals,” “There’s a net there,” “Sieve,” “We can’t hear you,” the “scoreboard” cheer and “season’s over” during tournament play.
  • CHEERS Checklist 1

    CHEERS Checklist 1

    Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards – CHEERS Checklist 1 CHEERS Checklist Items to include when reporting economic evaluations of health interventions The ISPOR CHEERS Task Force Report, Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force, provides examples and further discussion of the 24-item CHEERS Checklist and the CHEERS Statement. It may be accessed via the Value in Health or via the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines – CHEERS: Good Reporting Practices webpage: http://www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp Section/item Item Recommendation Reported No on page No/ line No Title and abstract Title 1 Identify the study as an economic evaluation or use more specific terms such as “cost-effectiveness analysis”, and describe the interventions compared. Abstract 2 Provide a structured summary of objectives, perspective, setting, methods (including study design and inputs), results (including base case and uncertainty analyses), and conclusions. Introduction Background and 3 Provide an explicit statement of the broader context for the objectives study. Present the study question and its relevance for health policy or practice decisions. Methods Target population and 4 Describe characteristics of the base case population and subgroups subgroups analysed, including why they were chosen. Setting and location 5 State relevant aspects of the system(s) in which the decision(s) need(s) to be made. Study perspective 6 Describe the perspective of the study and relate this to the costs being evaluated. Comparators 7 Describe the interventions or strategies being compared and state why they were chosen.
  • "He's Everything You're Not . . ."1 a Semiological Analysis of Cheers

    "He's Everything You're Not . . ."1 a Semiological Analysis of Cheers

    "HE'sEvtnvrHrNcYou'nnNor..." Bsncsn . 229 "He's Everything You're Not . ."1 A SemiologicalAnalYsis of Cheers Arthur AsaBetger T Is it symbolicthat DianeChnmbers, one of theoriginal leads in thesit- com Cheer,s,has blond hair? why doesCarla the waitresshaae a temperand by the nameNorm? These kid aroundso frankly aboutsex? what is signit'ied Bergersets out to answ-erin his are justa 7ew"o7 tne questions that Arthur Asa semiologicalaialysis of oneof themost popular situation comedies of all time. Takingiis criticil poiition the structuralistsFerdinand Saussure and "reads'"from llmbirto Eco,Berger the text o/Cheers throughthe l-ens of sem.iotics' For Berger,this riading is a processof decodinga text and of interpretingthe signsyitems it contaiis.He'defines a sign as a unit madeup of a soundimage oid ,"rorrrpt---or, in the terminologyof thestructuralists, of a signifierand a signified." 'Brrg* is carefulto point out that thesign is not na1nal; in otherwords, blondhair means sometiting to us not becnusethere is a naturalconnection be- "meaning," tweenblond hair and itssi-catted but becauseof thecultural and it with. Therules establishinga re- historicalaalues that we haae inaested for " lationshipbetween the signifier and thesignified, then, are called codes,"and thesecodes tells us whal signsmean. When this type of semioticstudy is ap' subtexts,or concealedmeanings, 'comepliedto a situationcomedy, some interesting to tight. For exampli,the bnr itselfmay signtfu more- than iusj^a building thecharacters can buy atcohoi. lts geographical location (Bostod and in which "classier" its interior decoratingsuggrti that it is than a collegeor zootking classbar. For Berger,"botii1tnese signiJiers giae the Cheers bar a meaningbe- yond itsdictionary definition.