DOCSLIB.ORG

Helmet-Mounted Display Design Guide I Contract NAS2-14151

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Helmet-Mounted Display Design Guide I Contract NAS2-14151 https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19980018292 2020-06-16T01:04:29+00:00Z Helmet-Mounted Display Design Guide Richard L. Newman and Kevin W. Greeley TR-97-11 3 November 1997 Crew Systems Post Office Box 963 San Marcos, Texas (512)-754-7733 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB NO. 0704-0188 I -- Pu~licreporting burden for thls collection of lnformatlon IS estimated to average 1 hour per response~nclud~n~the tlme for reviewing instructions, searching exlstlna data sources 1 gather~noand malntalilnc? the data needed and Completlno and revlewlng the collection of informatlon Send comments reqardlnq thls burden estlmate or any othei aspect of this collect8on of informat~on.~nciud~n- suagestions for reducing tiiir burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate Tor lnf6rmation Operations and Remns, 1215 Jefferson 1 Davis Hlohway, Su~te1204. Arlinat&, \j& 22202.43132, and to tn.0 Off~ceof Manaaem-nt and Budae?. Paoerwork Reduction Proiect. (0704-0188).. Washlnaton. DC 20503 1 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DAT S COVERED 3 November 1997 Eontractor Report 1I 1I 14. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS I Helmet-Mounted Display Design Guide I Contract NAS2-14151 Richard L. Newman and Kevin W. Greeley I I I 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAMEIS) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 1 Crew Systems Post Office Box 963 San Marcos, Texas 78667 I 9. SPONSORINGIMONlTORlMG AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(E5) 10. SPONSORING IMONIJORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Aeroflightdynamics Directorate I Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California 94035 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION I AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Unclassified-Unlimited I 13. AESTRACT (Maximum 200 words) 1 Helmet-mounted d~splays(HMDs) present flight, navigation, and weapon information in the pilot's line of sight. The HMD was developed to allow the pilot to retain aircraft and weapon information while looking off boresight. This document reviews current state-of-the-art in HMDs and presents a design guide fir the HMD engineer in identifying several critical HMD issues: symbol stabilization, inadequate definitions, undefined symbol drive laws, helmet considerations, and field-of-view (FOV) vs. resolution tradeoff requirements. In particular, display latency is a key issue for HMDs. In addition to requiring further experimental studies, it impacts the definition and control law issues. Symbol stabilization is also critical. In the case of the Apache helicopter, the lack of compensation for pilot head motion creates exces- sive workload during hovering and nap-of-the-earth (NOE flight. This translates into exces- sive training requirements. There is no agreed upon set ot' definitions or descriptions for how HMD symbols are driven to compensate for pilot head motion. A set of definitions is pro- posed to address this. There are several specific areas where simulation and flight experi- ments are needed: development of hover and NOE symbologies which com ensate for pilot head movement; display latency and sampling, and the tradeoff between F8 V, sensor reso- lution and symbology. 114. SUIJECT TERMS I Helmet-Mounted Displays(HMD); Flight Displays; Symbology; f Latency; Field-of-View (FOV); Resolution; Stabilization OF PEPORT OF THIS PAGE OF ABSTRACT IL P I NSlv 7'546-0: -280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev 2-89) Prescribed by ANSI Std 239.18 298 102 The helmet-mounted display (HMD) presents flight, navigation, and weapon information in the pilot's line of sight. The HMD was developed to allow the pilot to retain aircraft and weapon information while looking off boresight. This document reviews current state-of-the-art in HMDs and presents a design guide to assist the HMD engineer in identifying several critical HMD issues: symbol stabilization, inadequate definitions, undefined symbol drive laws, helmet considerations, and field- of-view (FOV) vs. resolution tradeoff requirements. In particular, display latency is a key issue for HMDs. In addition to requiring further experimental studies, it was found to impact the definition and control law issues. Symbol stabilization is critical. In the case of the Apache helicopter, the lack of com- pensation for pilot head motion creates excessive workload during hovering and nap- of-the-earth (NOE) flight. This high workload translates into excessive training require- ments. Part of the problem is there is no agreed upon set of definitions or descriptions for how HMD symbols are driven to compensate for pilot head motion. A candidate set of definitions is proposed to address this. There are several specific areas where additional simulation and flight experiments are needed. These include development of hover and NOE symbology which compensates for pilot head movement; the issue of display latency and sampling, and the tradeoff between FOV, sensor resolution and symbology. This work was sponsored by the Aeroflightdynamics Directorate, Ames Research Cen- ter, Moffett Field, California under contract NAS2-14151. Ms. Catharine P. Levin was Contracting Officer. Dr. Wendell Stephens was the Contracting Officer's Technical Representative. Their help is appreciated. The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Richard Scwartz of Lockheed- Martin who reviewed the optics chapter and Mr. Asa Mader of Indeterminate Media who prepared the the database. The many technical discussions with Mr. Loran Haworth of the Aeroflightdynamics Directorate were always interesting and of great help. Intentionally left blank Summary . iii Acknowledgements. iii Contents . v List of Figures . xi List of Tables xv Abbreviations xiii 1: Introduction . 1 A The ~eedFO; a ~esi~n~eihodolo~~ B Engineering Constraints C Display Design Fundamentals D The Evaluation Process E Relationship to Electronic Database F Organization of the Design Guide G References 2: The Need for a Design Methodology . A Precedents B Cross-over C New Challenges 3: Historical Review . A ~evelo~ment'ofcockpit ~ib~~a~s' B Development of Cockpit Automation C Cockpit Displays D Fly-By-Wire E HUD Development F HMD Development G Effect of Superimposed Imagery H Effect of Field-of-View I Spatial Disorientation J Symbology Lessons Learned K References 4: A Review of HMD Technology . A Differences Between HDD;, HUD~,and HMDS ' B Typical Arrangements C Data Processing D Head Tracking E Examples of HMD Designs F Rotary-Wing and VTOL HMD Symbology G Fixed-Wing Transport HMD Symbology H Fixed-Wing Fighter HMD Symbology I. Observations J. References 5: Design Methodology for Integrating HMDs . 105 A Introduction B Mission Considerations C Engineering Considerations D Cockpit Integration E Development of Display F References 6: Head-mounted Display Evaluations. 115 A History of Display Evaluations B Subjective Data C Test Approach D Evaluation Flight Tasks E Choice of Pilots F References 7: HMD Coordinate Systems 133 A Cockpit Geometry B Definitions C Reference Frames D Traps for the Unwary E Summary F References 8: A Review of Optics 151 A Optical ~undamentais B Pupil-Forming vs. Non-Pupil Forming Systems C Image Quality D See-Through Optics E References 9: Human Factors Issues. 171 A Human Vision B Display Issues C Data Latency Issues D Operator Precedents, Expectations, and Preferences E Spatial Disorientation F Helicopter Human Factors G Head and Neck Considerations H References 10: Optical Criteria 199 A ~ield-&iewm B Transmittance C Displacement Errors D Distortion E Optical Power F Binocular DisparitylAlignment G Symbologyllmage Display Accuracy H Symbologyllmage Display Luminance I Image Magnification J Image Rotation K Exit Pupil L Physical Eye Relief M lnterpupilary Distance (IPD) N Reflections 0 Chromatic Aberrations P ShphericalIAstigmatic Aberrations Q References 11: Environmental Criteria . 21 1 A Environmental Testing B Electromagnetic Interference C External Light D Power Requirements E References 12: Software Criteria . 21 3 A Software ~esi~n B Architecture C Data Fusion D Error Checking E Software Testing F Update Rates G Dynamic Response J Signal Augmentation I Damping J Jitter K Noise L Digital Displays M Dynamic Modulation Transfer Function N Documentation 0 References 13: Form and Fit Criteria . 221 A Head Tracker ~ccurac~ B Head Tilt Accuracy C Head-Tracker Field-of-Regard D Head-Tracker Latency E Fit F Head-borne Weight G Head-Protection H Egress I. References Mode and Functional Criteria . 229 A Symbol List B Horizon Reference C Symbol Priority D Declutter E Mode Annunciation F Warning Indications G Sensor Pointing Accuracy H Sensor Field-of-Regard I Sensor Gimballing J References Display Criteria . 235 A Compatibility 'With other ~is~la~s B Clutter C Size of Character D Shape of Symbols E Line Width F Fonts G Color H Raster Image I Resolution J Flicker K Coordinate Systems L References Primary Flight Display Symbology . 241 A Primary Flight Reference B Hover Mode C Nap-of-the-Earth Mode D Transition Mode E Low-Level Cruise Mode F Declutter G References Conclusions 255 A Issues B Comments C Recommendations D Summary E. References Glossary . 265 A loss& B References References Cited in Text 313 Bibliography 331 21 : Strawman HMD Specification Outline . 361 A General B Optical Specifications C Environmental Specifications D Software Specifications E Form and Fit Specifications F Functional Specifications G Display Specifications H Display Dynamics Specifications I Sensor Functional Specifications J References 22: Database Manual . 373 A Structure of database B User's Guide C Electronic Documentation D Database script (new material)) E References Intentionally left blank. -List of Figures- FigureTitle II Incorporation of Early Feedback in Cockpit Design 3.01 Design Flow Chart 3.02 Cockpit Design Flow Chart 3.03 Cockpit Design Flow Chart 3.04 Cockpit Design Flow Chart 3.05 Klopfstein (TC-121) HUD Symbology . 3.06 Apache Hover Symbology 3.07 Apache Cruise Symbology 3.08 Scene-linked HUD Symbology 4.01 Typical Civil HUD Architecture 4.02 HMD Data Architecture . 4.03 Global Pitch Ladder Symbol 4.04 Typical Optical Head Tracker 4.05 Typical Magnetic Head Tracker 4.06 UH-1 N Cruise ANVISIHUD Symbology 4.07 CH-47D ANVISIHUD Symbology .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Combat Aircraft Team; the US Air Force Air Power Yearbook Is the Ultimate Guide to the World’S Most Powerful Air Arm
    Advanced jet TRAINING ALENIA AERMACCHI M-346 • ISRAELI SKYHAWK RETIREMENT • PACER CLASSIC T-38 TALONS • GREEK BUCKEYES AND TEXAN IIS Volume 17 • Number 3 AMERICA’S BESTSELLING MILITARY AVIATION MAGAZINE combataircraft.net EAGLE FROM THE COCKPIT Pilot stories from the mighty F-15C ‘Desert Storm’ 25 years ON F-15C victories IN THE NEWS: USAF Saves the a-10 SIKORSKY CH-53K C-5 SUPER GALAXY KING STALLION AT DOVER AFB S-3 Vikings BOW OUT OF UK £4.50 SERVICE WITH VX-30 CHINESE FIGHTER BOMBER REVIEW MARCH 2016 SPECIAL united states air force air power YEARBOOK 2016 Produced by the Combat Aircraft team; the US Air Force Air Power Yearbook is the ultimate guide to the world’s most powerful air arm. Packed with features on latest aircraft capabilities, famous squadrons and the personnel that fly and maintain the various types, plus a detailed unit and aircraft air power review. This 100-page publication is a must-have for USAF aviation fans. FEATURING: F-22 on the front line A review of the Raptor’s combat debut over Syria and recent deployment to Europe. 40 Years of exercise’ Red Flag’ A review and tribute to the world’s most famous exercise. Bayou Militia A unit review of the F-15Cs of the 122nd Fighter Squadron Louisiana ANG F-35 training Behind the scenes at Eglin and Luke AFB as the F-35 training squadrons get up to full speed. B-1 today Exclusive interviews with B-1 senior officers as we detail recent combat operations and latest JUST upgrades for the B-1 Lancer.
    [Show full text]
  • F-16 Barak Strike 17
    N O 1 9 Y EY EA RA 1 0 A P R I L 2 0 1 8 STRIKE 17 CROATIAN AIR THE LARGEST FORCE TO RECEIVE EXERCISE OF F-16 BARAK 2017 FIGHTER AIRCRAFT interview VICE ADMIRAL COLIN J. KILRAIN NATO SPECIAL OPERATIONS CYBER HEADQUARTERS SHIELD 2018 THE READINESS IMPERATIVE Cover by Tomislav Brandt IN THIS ISSUE croatian air force Edited by: Vesna PINTARIĆ, Photo: Tomislav BRANDT croatian military magazine The Republic of Croatia has faced one of its most impor- tant and complex strategic decisions involving its defence sector since the 1991-95 Homeland War. It had to choose between retaining the capability to monitor and protect its sovereign air space, or losing that control and thus renouncing the nation’s full sovereignty. Drawing upon its experiences from the Homeland War, in which air force USAF/WikimediaFoto: Commons played a decisive role, the only logical conclusion was that investing in fighter aircraft today meant investing in the future and security of Croatia, and a pre-condition of its stability and future economic development. AT ITS SESSION OF 29 MARCH 2018, THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ADOPTED THE DECISION ON THE PROCUREMENT OF A MULTI-ROLE FIGHTER AIRCRAFT, OPTING FOR THE LOCKHEED-MARTIN F-16C/D BLOCK 30 BARAK FROM THE STATE OF ISRAEL. IT REPRESENTS A HISTORIC DECISION FOR THE CROATIAN AIR FORCE... CROATIAN AIR FIGHTER FORCE TO RECEIVE F-16 BARAK AIRCRAFT 4 CROATIAN AIR FORCE 4 APRIL 2018 CROMIL CROMIL APRIL 2018 5 CROATIAN AIR FORCE TO RECEIVE F-16 BARAK FIGHTER AIRCRAFT 04-13_F-16_Barak.indd 4-5 PAGE27/04/2018 13:084 14 INTERVIEW VICE ADMIRAL COLIN J.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Flight
    FROM THE COCKPIT IN THIS ISSUE >>> 03 BEHIND THE SCREENS : Alpha 3.5 Flight Model Update RSI MUSEUM : 13 The Past, Present & Future of Flight Controls GALACTAPEDIA : 27 Leyland’s Tortoise LORE FEATURE: 29 MaxOx ISSUE: 07 04 Editor: Ben Lesnick Copy Editor: Martin Driver Layout: Michael Alder FROM THE COCKPIT GREETINGS, CITIZENS! You might as well call this one “the flight issue!” was kind enough to give us a whole load of detail on Instead of focusing on the development of a particular the work that went into this one. Enjoy! ship, this time we’re looking at the development of flight itself. That’s because Alpha 3.5, now available We’ve been bouncing around ideas on how to to the community at large, introduces a major revamp relaunch the RSI Museum in Jump Point and hit on of Star Citizen’s complex flight model. The immortal an idea that seemed like it could be an interesting one: Townes Van Zandt sang that “to live is to fly,” and that a look at both the real-world history of something and couldn’t be more literal in the case of Star Citizen. To how important it is to the makeup of the ‘verse. So, this say that there’s been plenty of debate about the flight month’s Museum looks at the history of the HOTAS model since it first went public with Arena Commander through its real-world development in the 1950s for back in 2014 would be an understatement. While jet fighters, its adoption as the high-end flight setup the community has regularly provided invaluable of choice for gamers in the 90s, and then its use in feedback and the developers have continued to refine Human starships of the 30th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Mp-Msg-045-05
    Modeling & Simulation for Experimentation, Test & Evaluation and Training: Alenia Aeronautica Experiences and Perspectives Mrs. Marcella Guido Alenia Aeronautica Simulation & System’s Operability C.so Marche 41, 10146 Torino Italy [email protected] Mr. Cristiano Montrucchio Alenia Aeronautica Simulation & System’s Operability Manager C.so Marche, 41, 10146 Torino Italy [email protected] ABSTRACT The use of Modeling & Simulation to support aircraft development is nowadays common practice within any modern aeronautical industry, and a long term key capability of Alenia Aeronautica. Starting from such crucial role, M&S utilization has progressively expanded to effectively support the aeronautical system’s early stages – feasibility and definition, and later stages – in service support and pilots training, becoming an essential element during the entire system’s life cycle. The main tool to implement and sustain such capability is the Synthetic Environment, which relies on the following elements: • Flight Simulators with engineering and training potential • Simulators networking at both LAN and WAN (Local and Wide Area Network) levels • Tactical scenarios • Image generation • Virtual reality The paper will focus on the latest major experiences of Alenia Aeronautica with the AMX ACOL, Eurofighter, C-27J and Sky-X UAV Programs, from systems concept, through development and experimentation, to pilots training and mission rehearsal. Moreover, Alenia Aeronautica’s approach and perspectives in the field of the simulation of Network Centric Operations will be described: the Network Centric Simulation Environment 1.0 INTRODUCTION The use of Modeling & Simulation (M&S) in aerospace engineering is nowadays common practice within any modern aeronautical firm and a long term key capability of Alenia Aeronautica.
    [Show full text]
  • Helmet-Mounted Display Design Guide I Contract NAS2-14151
    Helmet-Mounted Display Design Guide Richard L. Newman and Kevin W. Greeley TR-97-11 3 November 1997 Crew Systems Post Office Box 963 San Marcos, Texas (512)-754-7733 REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB NO. 0704-0188 I -- Pu~licreporting burden for thls collection of lnformatlon IS estimated to average 1 hour per response~nclud~n~the tlme for reviewing instructions, searching exlstlna data sources 1 gather~noand malntalilnc? the data needed and Completlno and revlewlng the collection of informatlon Send comments reqardlnq thls burden estlmate or any othei aspect of this collect8on of informat~on.~nciud~n- suagestions for reducing tiiir burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate Tor lnf6rmation Operations and Remns, 1215 Jefferson 1 Davis Hlohway, Su~te1204. Arlinat&, \j& 22202.43132, and to tn.0 Off~ceof Manaaem-nt and Budae?. Paoerwork Reduction Proiect. (0704-0188).. Washlnaton. DC 20503 1 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DAT S COVERED 3 November 1997 Eontractor Report 1I 1I 14. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS I Helmet-Mounted Display Design Guide I Contract NAS2-14151 Richard L. Newman and Kevin W. Greeley I I I 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAMEIS) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER 1 Crew Systems Post Office Box 963 San Marcos, Texas 78667 I 9. SPONSORINGIMONlTORlMG AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(E5) 10. SPONSORING IMONIJORING AGENCY REPORT NUMBER Aeroflightdynamics Directorate I Ames Research Center Moffett Field, California 94035 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 12a. DISTRIBUTION I AVAILABILITY STATEMENT 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE Unclassified-Unlimited I 13. AESTRACT (Maximum 200 words) 1 Helmet-mounted d~splays(HMDs) present flight, navigation, and weapon information in the pilot's line of sight.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Defence Acronyms and Abbreviations
    Acronym Long Title 1ACC No. 1 Air Control Centre 1SL First Sea Lord 200D Second OOD 200W Second 00W 2C Second Customer 2C (CL) Second Customer (Core Leadership) 2C (PM) Second Customer (Pivotal Management) 2CMG Customer 2 Management Group 2IC Second in Command 2Lt Second Lieutenant 2nd PUS Second Permanent Under Secretary of State 2SL Second Sea Lord 2SL/CNH Second Sea Lord Commander in Chief Naval Home Command 3GL Third Generation Language 3IC Third in Command 3PL Third Party Logistics 3PN Third Party Nationals 4C Co‐operation Co‐ordination Communication Control 4GL Fourth Generation Language A&A Alteration & Addition A&A Approval and Authorisation A&AEW Avionics And Air Electronic Warfare A&E Assurance and Evaluations A&ER Ammunition and Explosives Regulations A&F Assessment and Feedback A&RP Activity & Resource Planning A&SD Arms and Service Director A/AS Advanced/Advanced Supplementary A/D conv Analogue/ Digital Conversion A/G Air‐to‐Ground A/G/A Air Ground Air A/R As Required A/S Anti‐Submarine A/S or AS Anti Submarine A/WST Avionic/Weapons, Systems Trainer A3*G Acquisition 3‐Star Group A3I Accelerated Architecture Acquisition Initiative A3P Advanced Avionics Architectures and Packaging AA Acceptance Authority AA Active Adjunct AA Administering Authority AA Administrative Assistant AA Air Adviser AA Air Attache AA Air‐to‐Air AA Alternative Assumption AA Anti‐Aircraft AA Application Administrator AA Area Administrator AA Australian Army AAA Anti‐Aircraft Artillery AAA Automatic Anti‐Aircraft AAAD Airborne Anti‐Armour Defence Acronym
    [Show full text]
  • Organization Chart
    Elbit Systems Ltd. Advanced Technology Center, P.O.B. 539, Haifa 31053, Israel Tel: 972-4-8315315, Website: www.elbitsystems.com Organization chart MAJOR BUSINESS DIVISIONS Aerospace Electro-optics - Elop Land and C4I - Tadiran Elbit Systems of America (ESA) UAS Elisra (70%) USA ISRAEL EUROPE ASIA 100% 100% 100% 100% ESA Business Lines Elbit Security Systems Ferranti Technologies Elbit Systems of Korea UNITED KINGDOM KOREA Airborne Solutions 100% 100% 26% Elbit Systems - Halbit Cyclone UEL Land Solutions UNITED KINGDOM INDIA Sensor and 100% 100% Electro-optics Elbit Systems - Solutions European Subsidiary Kinetics BELGIUM C4I Solutions 50% 100% Commercial Aviation - SCD European Subsidiary SOUTH AMERICA Kollsman AUSTRIA Services and Support Solutions 50% 100% 100% Opgal Elbit Sisteme AEL Medical Instruments - ROMANIA BRAZIL KMC Systems VSI (50%) 100% Telefunken RACOMS UAS-D (50%) GERMANY 51% U-TacS UNITED KINGDOM Design: Studio Amnon Zamir, Main photographer : Eli Gross, Keren Or Additional photography: p.3,6,8,26,27 Shlomo Shoham p.7,21 Albatros p.9, IAF magazine p.14 Assaf Haber p.15 Ofer Yanov p.19 Lockheed Martin photo p.21 Michael Mas p.49 U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Jasonson GaGamble)mble) p.24-2p.24-255 Miki Koren p.45 U.S. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Kevin J. Gruenwald p.55 DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Shane A. Cuomo, U.S. Air Force. p.48 Courtesy photo by Kevin Kidd p.49 U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Joe Zuccaro p54 U.S. Air Force photohoto bbyy Master Sgt. VVal Gempis p.55 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • JAPCC Journal Ed. 23
    Spring /Summer 2017 The Journal of the JAPCC – Transforming Joint Air Power Air Joint Transforming – Journal of the JAPCC The Edition 24, Spring /Summer 2017 PAGE 6 PAGE 11 PAGE 28 The JAPCC Interview Hypersonic Vehicles Future Battlefi eld with Major General Game Changers for Rotorcraft Capability Max A. L. T. Nielsen Future Warfare? Part 1: Analysing the Edition 24 Edition Chief of Air Staff , Future Operating Environment Defence Command Denmark NATO’S PARTNER FOR COLLECTIVE DEFENCE • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • As NATO’s trusted partner ThalesRaytheonSystems provides Europe’s first-ever Integrated Air and Ballistic Missile Defence Command and Control System. ThalesRaytheonSystems’ unique international experience working in concert with an industrial network from NATO 15 Nations, make it the most reliable partner to lead NATO’s evolving Air C2 efforts and to expand BMD programme to include all European territory. PubThalesRaytheonSystem_DefenseMattersA4_EXE.indd 1 22/05/2017 15:32 Editorial NATO’S PARTNER FOR It is our great pleasure to present the 24th Edition between nations, based on lessons learned in COLLECTIVE DEFENCE of the JAPCC Journal. A prominent theme per­ Oper ation Unified Protector. This is a major step meating this journal is the significance of the Joint in the development of non­US AAR capacity across Strike Fighter arriving in many NATO Allies’ national NATO, and both of these programs are significant forces. Starting off, Major General Max A. L. T. force multipliers for the
    [Show full text]
  • A Conceptual Design of a General Aviation Hands-On-Throttle and Stick (HOTAS) System
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2003 A Conceptual Design of a General Aviation Hands-on-Throttle and Stick (HOTAS) System. Mark N. Callender University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Callender, Mark N., "A Conceptual Design of a General Aviation Hands-on-Throttle and Stick (HOTAS) System.. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2003. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1908 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Mark N. Callender entitled "A Conceptual Design of a General Aviation Hands-on-Throttle and Stick (HOTAS) System.." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Aviation Systems. Ralph D. Kimberlin, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: U. Peter Solies, Alfonso Pujol, Jr. Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Office: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Mark N.
    [Show full text]
  • Flying Sabre
    N O 2 0 YEARYEA 1 0 T O BOECR 2 0 1 8 international interview military exercise COMMANDER OF THE RAMAT DAVID AIR BASE FLYING SABRE enhanced forward presence 1 st HRVCON to NATO-led SEA MSO Operation “TIGROVI” DISPLAY PROFESSIONALISM GUARDIAN IN LITHUANIA CROATIAN eFP VULKAN BATTERY IN POLAND the most complex exercise of the Croatian Armed Forces to date cover_Cromil_20.indd 1 05/11/2018 13:18 02-03_sadrzaj.indd 2 05/11/2018 11:09 Cover by Tomislav Brandt IN THIS ISSUE croatian armed forces Author: Vesna Pintarić, Photos by: Tomislav Brandt croatian military magazine THE WIDE RANGING INTERSERVICE COMBINED INVOLVING SOME 5,500 PERSONNEL AND EXERCISE OF ALL PARTS OF THE CROATIAN ARMED SOME RESERVE UNITS, THE EXERCISE TESTED FORCES ENTITLED VELEBIT 18 JOINT FORCE, WAS THE THE ABILITY OF THE CROATIAN ARMED FORCES COUNTRY’S LARGEST MILITARY EXERCISE TO DATE, FOR NATIONAL DEFENCE OF THE INDEPENDENCE RUNNING CONTINUOUSLY FOR 72 HOURS AND SOVEREIGNTY OF THE REPUBLIC OF FROM 1315 OCTOBER 2018 AT MULTIPLE LOCATIONS CROATIA AND PRESERVATION OF ITS ACROSS THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA. TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY… JOINT FORCE owwwwwwwp the most complex exercise of the Croatian Armed Forces to date A comprehensive inter-service joint live fire exercise marily the Patria armoured personnel vehicle, the PzH number of inter-service and joint exercises organised entitled Velebit 18-Joint Force was conducted across self-propelled Howitzer and the OH 58D Kiowa Warrior by individual commands of the Croatian Armed Forces. all training ranges and areas in the Republic of Croatia helicopter); a capability demonstration of joint operations The symbolic title of the Exercise was explained by from 13–15 October 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Aviaton System of Flying Crew Improving Safety in the Aircraft Operation
    TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE RESEARCH 1 (254) 2019, s. 1–16 DOI: 10.2478/TAR-2019-0001 c Copyright by Wydawnictwa Naukowe Instytutu Lotnictwa COMPREHENSIVE AVIATON SYSTEM OF FLYING CREW IMPROVING SAFETY IN THE AIRCRAFT OPERATION Arkadiusz Rodak ul. Górnośląska 59A/1, 62-800 Kalisz, Poland [email protected] Abstract The article describes 10 known programmes of practical flight training in military aviation – spe- cialization: Multi-Mission Tactical Jet Pilot, which is the highest level of military pilot training in all types of military and civil aviation – comparable only to the level of training and experience of the pilot-instructor of the Military Aviation School. The presented comparison was developed on the basis of literature research from the point of view of, among others, an aircraft operation engineer and a pilot-instructor. Keywords: TS-11 “Iskra”, flight training, military pilot, flight safety. 1. INTRODUCTION After a comparative study of several selected systems of practical aviation training occurring in military aviation, specialization: Multi-Mission Tactical Jet Pilot, a simple conclusion can be drawn that a country with an aviation industry, - i.e.: aeronautical plants for the serial construction of gliders, - aircraft airframe series construction plants, - aircraft engine serial production plants, - serial production plants for aviation equipment – including: (a) avionics, (b) radio-electronic equipment, (c) hydraulic, (d) pneumatic systems and equipment for such aircraft and construction offices, headed by experienced constructors at these aircraft factories. and cyclical graduates of aviation faculties who, in accordance with the common interest, cooperate with aviation institutes, contributing to a flexible response to the needs of modification, cyclical modernization of the aircraft – glider, aircraft, aircraft engine, avionics, which results in a functioning system of 2 ARKADIUSZ RODAK flight personnel training – pilots, generated and generates low cost and high flexibility of quotations.
    [Show full text]
  • SNS COLLEGE of TECHNOLOGY (An Autonomous Institution) DEPARTMENT of AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING UNIT: 03.FLIGHT DECKS and COCKPITS
    SNS COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY (An Autonomous Institution) DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICAL ENGINEERING UNIT: 03.FLIGHT DECKS AND COCKPITS TOPIC:7.HOTAS HOTAS: HOTAS an abbreviation for Hands On Throttle-And-Stick, is the name given to the concept of placing buttons and switches on the throttle stick and flight control stick in an aircraft‘s cockpit, allowing the pilot to access vital cockpit functions and fly the aircraft without having to remove his hands from the throttle and flight controls. Application of the concept was pioneered with the Ferranti AIRPASS radar and gunsight control system used by the English Electric Lightning[1] and is widely used on all modern fighter aircraft such as the F-16 Fighting Falcon. HOTAS is a shorthand term which refers to the pattern of controls in the modern fighter aircraft cockpit. Having all switches on the stick and throttle allows the pilot to keep his ―hands on throttle-and-stick‖, thus allowing him to remain focused on more important duties than looking for controls in the cockpit. The goal is to improve the pilot‘s situational awareness, his ability to manipulate switch and button controls in turbulence, under stress, or during high G-force maneuvers, to improve his reaction time, to minimize instances when he must remove his hands from one or the other of the aircraft‘s controls to use another aircraft system, and total time spent doing so. The concept has also been applied to the steering wheels of modern open-wheelracecars, like those used in Formula One and the Indy Racing League. HOTAS has been adapted for game controllers used for flight simulators (most such controllers are based on the F-16 Fighting Falcon‗s) and in cars equipped with radio controls on the steering wheel.
    [Show full text]