Amerimuncvi BG Russia-Mjb3.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amerimuncvi BG Russia-Mjb3.Pdf © 2018 American University Model United Nations Conference All rights reserved. No part of this background guide may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means whatsoever without express written permission from the American University Model United Nations Conference Secretariat. Please direct all questions to [email protected] Nisaa Chaudhry & Emily Devereaux Chairs Delegates -- My name is Nisaa Chaudhry and I am a first year public health major on the pre-med track here at American. I did Model UN throughout high school and hosted a few high school-level conferences, as well served as part of the conference’s secretariat. I am a D.C. area native, so I love showing my friends around the city and trying new things with them. Outside of class, you can catch me tutoring with D.C. Reads, cheering on the Wizards, or watching re-runs of Scandal. Being a part of Model UN is one of my most cherished high school memories, and I am very excited to take part in AMERIMUNC VI. From my time in Model UN, my biggest takeaway is to recognize the importance of teamwork. Each delegate has the ability to pitch in ideas that can ultimately craft viable solutions, so do not be afraid to say what’s on your mind. Recognizing the importance of teamwork will not only help you become a stronger delegate, but it will also allow you to learn something new. My name is Emily Devereaux and I am a first year international relations major on the pre-med track. I did Model UN throughout high school, and I am also on American’s Model UN team. I love to debate, but I also enjoy getting out into DC and exploring the culture, art, and fun things to do in the city! I spend my (minimal) free time reading or running. My favorite show is Parks and Recreation (my senior year communications teacher told me I am Leslie Knope, what a compliment). I would love to see all the delegates give it their all. From my experience in Model UN, many delegates give up or burn out. While it seems so easy to do so, it is more rewarding to give a genuine effort. I look forward to seeing creative ideas and constructive debate between everyone. Just remember hard work pays off! A genuine effort will bring you very far, not just in this conference but in everything you do! Good luck in your preparations. Feel free to email us with any questions, comments, or concerns! See everyone in February! Best, Emily & Nisaa 01 THE CABINET of THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ABOUT RUSSIA The President of Russia is the directly elected head of state. The President then appoints a Prime Minister, who must be approved by the Cabinet. Both the cabinet and the Prime Minister and President make policy decisions regarding the Russian Federation. Committee at a Glance any means necessary. You may all take In this committee you will be acting separate actions within your own members of President Vladimir Putin’s jurisdiction of your position of power in Cabinet of the Russian Federation. Your this cabinet, and that you should job is to advise the president during behave within the scope of your crisis, and to make decisions on which officials ideology and beliefs. Should actions to take in response to the other you step outside the boundaries of committee’s actions and any other your capabilities, the crisis staff will crises that may occur. This can range alert you and remind you of your limits. from any powers given to the president As a member of the Cabinet of Russia, himself, on any matter that may assist in we wish you luck in leading Russia in solving these problems, as long as they this crisis, and President Putin looks are within the capabilities of the forward to the solutions you produce Russian Federation. Remember to keep with your fellow cabinet members. in mind that the committee’s sole purpose is to advise and recommend Russian-North Korean Relations actions to the president, should the president chose to follow is to the Economic Relations discretion of President Putin, who will Russia has had a strong economic be characterized by the crisis staff. Any interest in North Korea since the decisions made by the president are division of Korea. When Russia was still final. Your goal as a committee is to a member state of the Soviet Union, It’s protect the best interests of the Russian economic support of North Korea Federation and the people of Russia by alongside China’s formed the backbone of the Korean economy. By 02 1990, Russia’s share of North Korea’s on the Korean peninsula are to foreign trade reached an all time high maintain good standing with both the of 53%. Russia was not only involved North and South in order to maintain with trade but also with building North the current mutually beneficial Korea’s heavy industry. Approximately economic relationship between 70 large industrial enterprises were themselves and the two Koreas. built in North Korea with Soviet help by Russia’s economic investment in the 1990. development of the Korean Peninsula, leads to their continued insistence on a When the Soviet Union collapsed peaceful and cooperative relationship however, the new Russian between the two Koreas. Russia’s administration focused its efforts on economic relationship with the two building a new economic relationship Koreas is a key part of their “Turning to with South Korea, and began to neglect the East” strategy as Korea’s position in their previous economic interaction with North East Asia, would be a good the North. This sharp turn in the early jumping off point for Russian economic 90s largely ended bilateral economic involvement in the Asian Pacific Region. relations between the two countries Russia is dedicated to maintaining a until the end of the decade. peaceful relationship between the two Koreas and is strictly opposed to At the turn of the century, Russia military intervention or regime change. decided that bilateral cooperation Russia also promotes the full economic between themselves and the two engagement of North Korea with its Korean states was the most regional counterparts. economically beneficial option for Russian interests. In early 2000, the Treaty on Friendship, Good Neighborly Relations, and Cooperation was signed. This treaty led to renewed economic cooperation between North Korea and Russia. Later in 2001, A second treaty, The Moscow Declaration, was signed which emphasized cooperation in, “reconstruction of enterprises built by joint efforts particularly in electric energy industry” and “the project of creating a railway transport corridor linking the North and the South of the Korean Peninsula with Russia and Europe.” Overall this renewed economic relationship can be described as pragmatic and non ideologically based. This pragmatic approach continues to this day. Russia’s main economic goals 03 THE CABINET of THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 04 In 2012, it was agreed that Russia would forgive 90% of the DPRK’s debts Russia also hopes to implement huge in the region (i.e. continued escalation economic development projects for the of tensions between the DPRK and Korean peninsula that involve the America, Western Sanctions against cooperation of both North and South Russia and North Korea) are driving Korea. The largest and most ambitious more and more cooperation between of these include connecting the North Korea and Russia. trans-Korean Railway and the trans-Siberian Railway, constructing a Another prime example of a growing gas pipeline to South Korea through economic relationship between North North Korea, and supplying Russian Korea and the Russian Federation is electricity to the Korean Peninsula. the settlement of debt that North Korea Because these trilateral projects hinge inherited from its relationship with the on the easing of tensions between the Soviet Union. When Russia tried to North and South, Russia is decidedly renew economic relations with North against the North Korean nuclear Korea, this unpaid debt was one of the program. major obstacles to a new relationship. In 2012, it was agreed that Russia On the Korean side, Kim Jong Un has would forgive 90% of the DPRK’s debts made very clear that he wishes to open and the rest would be paid back over a up trade relations. The DPRK mostly 20 year period. It was also suggested wishes to reduce their reliance on that the money paid back to Russia Chinese trade which as of 2015 made would then be used to fund joint up about 90% of all of their foreign Russian-North Korea projects in trade. This leaves Russia as one of their education, healthcare and energy most likely choices for developing fields. friendly trade relations. Current affairs 05 THE CABINET of THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION In order to bypass Western sanctions North Korea, and South Korea. Because on North Korea that made banking of sanctions placed on North Korea by difficult, Russia and North Korea agreed South Korea, the only option for South to make all bank settlements in rubles Korean companies to invest in the when trading between the two North is through cooperation with countries. In early 2014, the first North Russia. Ultimately, Russia’s dedication Korean bank accounts were opened in to maintaining friendly economic Russian banks, opening up further relations with both North and South options for economic cooperation. In Korea, sets it apart from both the US the same conference, North Korea and China, and could set it up as a presented to the Russian delegation mediator and balancer on the special “economic zones” In these peninsula.
Recommended publications
  • What Is Russia Trying to Defend? ✩ Andrei Yakovlev
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Russian Journal of Economics 2 (2016) 146–161 www.rujec.org What is Russia trying to defend? ✩ Andrei Yakovlev Institute for Industrial and Market Studies, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia Abstract Contrary to the focus on the events of the last two years (2014–2015) associated with the accession of Crimea to Russia and military conflict in Eastern Ukraine, in this study, I stress that serious changes in Russian domestic policy (with strong pres­ sure on political opposition, state propaganda and sharp anti-Western rhetoric, as well as the fight against “foreign agents’) became visible in 2012. Geopolitical ambitions to revise the “global order” (introduced by the USA after the collapse of the USSR) and the increased role of Russia in “global governance” were declared by leaders of the country much earlier, with Vladimir Putin’s famous Munich speech in 2007. These ambitions were based on the robust economic growth of the mid-2000s, which en­ couraged the Russian ruling elite to adopt the view that Russia (with its huge energy resources) is a new economic superpower. In this paper, I will show that the con­ cept of “Militant Russia” in a proper sense can be attributed rather to the period of the mid-2000s. After 2008–2009, the global financial crisis and, especially, the Arab Spring and mass political protests against electoral fraud in Moscow in December 2011, the Russian ruling elite made mostly “militant” attempts to defend its power and assets. © 2016 Non-profit partnership “Voprosy Ekonomiki”. Hosting by Elsevier B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania United Nations Conference
    PUNC X: THE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE Table of Contents Letter from the Crisis Director Page 2 Letter from the Chair Page 3 Background Page 4 Russia Since 2016 – Notable Events Page 5 Delegate Positions Page 7 Committee Structure Page 10 Committee Goals Page 11 Sources Page 11 1 PUNC X: THE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE Delegates, My name is Milan Liu and I’ll be serving as your crisis director for the Russian Unity Conference 2020 at PUNC X. I’m a freshman at Penn State, pursuing a double major in International Politics and Geography, as well as minors in Chinese and Global Security. In addition to my love for international affairs and maps, I enjoy horseback riding, traveling, and binge-watching political dramas on Netflix. I have been involved in Model UN since my sophomore year of high school, and attended conferences at Penn State twice. I joined PSIADA last semester, and had the pleasure of crisis directing the Antarctic Treaty 2038 committee at PHUNC, Penn State’s high school Model UN conference, in the fall. I have always looked forward to Model UN conferences, and PUNC X is no exception. I’m excited to see the creativity of this group of delegates, and how you respond to the challenges Russia will face throughout the weekend. Feel free to reach out with any questions or concerns, and I’ll be happy to help in any way I can. Best, Milan [email protected] 2 PUNC X: THE PENNSYLVANIA UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE Delegates, Hello everyone! My name is Robert Liu and I am excited to be your Chair for Russian Unity Conference 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Anniversary Conference September 08-09, 2016 Moscow, Leninskie
    Anniversary Conference September 08-09, 2016 Thursday, September 08th, 2016 09:00-09:30 Reception and Registration 09:30-10:00 Conference Opening Round Table «Academic Research and Economic Policy-making» Participants: Andrey Belousov* (President Administration), Arkadiy 10:00-11:30 Dvorkovitch* (Government of Russia), Galina Hale (FRB San-Francisco), Andrey Klepatch (MSU), Alexey Ulyukaev* (Ministry of Economic Development), Ksenia Yudaeva (Bank of Russia), Chair: Elvira Nabiullina (Bank of Russia) 11:30-12:00 Coffee-break Irina Kirisheva (’06, Nazarbayev University) 12:00-12:45 Contests with sabotage and their optimal design Anna Chorniy (’06, Princeton) 12:45-13:30 Health economics: Human capital framework 13:30-15:00 Lunch Bank of Russia Workshop 15:00-15:45 DSGE modeling for policymaking in an Emerging market economy: some experience of the Bank of Russia Ruben Enikolopov (Barselona GSE, NES) 16:00-16:45 Social Media and Collective Action Oleg Itskhoki (‘03, Princeton) 16:45-17:30 Firms and the International Transmission of Shocks 17:30-18:00 Coffee-break Keynote Speech 18:00-19:15 Helene Rey (London Business School) TBA Moscow, Leninskie Gory, 1-46 MSU Department of Economics, Lecture Hall, П5 Anniversary Conference September 08-09, 2016 Friday, September 09th, 2016 Round Table «Modern Universities and Economic Education» Speakers: Alexey Belyanin (HSE), Shlomo Weber* (NES), Oleg Zamulin* 10:00-11:30 (NES), Oleg Itskhoki (Princeton), Philipp Kartaev (MSU), Evgeniy Kuznetsov (RVC), Andrey Markov (MSU) Chair: Alexandr Auzan 11:30-12:00 Coffee-break Vilen Lipatov (’98,Compass Lexecon) 12:00-12:45 Competition Policy Michael Alexeev (’75, Indiana University) 12:45-13:30 The 'Oil Curse' and Institutions: A Brief Survey 13:30-15:30 Lunch.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 35 Russia and Saudi Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges by John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Vladimir Putin presented an artifact made of mammoth tusk to Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman Al Saud in Riyadh, October 14–15, 2019 (President of Russia Web site) Russia and Saudi Arabia Russia and Saudia Arabia: Old Disenchantments, New Challenges By John W. Parker and Thomas F. Lynch III Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 35 Series Editor: Denise Natali National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2021 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Macro-Politics: Political Pragmatism Or, Economic Necessity
    The National Projects December 2019 Population and GDP (2020E data) The long and winding road Population 146.8 GDP, Nominal, US$ bln $1,781 Plans are worthless. Planning is essential” GDP/Capita, US$ $12,132 Dwight D. Eisenhower GDP/Capita, PPP, US$ $27,147 Source: World Bank, World-o-Meters, MA The National Projects (NP) are at the core of the Russian government’s efforts to pull the economy out of the current slump, National Projects - Spending* to create sustainable diversified long-term growth and to improve Rub, Bln US$ Bln lifestyle conditions in Russia. It is the key element of President Putin’s Human Capital 5,729 $88 effort to establish his legacy. Health 1,726 $27 Education 785 $12 We are now initiating coverage of the National Projects strategy. We Demographics 3,105 $48 will provide regular detailed updates about the progress in each of Culture 114 $2 the major project sectors, focusing especially on the opportunities Quality of Life 9,887 $152 Safer Roads 4,780 $74 for foreign investors and on the mechanisms for them to take part. Housing 1,066 $16 ▪ What is it? A US$390 billion program of public spending, designed Ecology 4,041 $62 to stimulate investment, build infrastructure and improve health Economic Growth 10,109 $156 and well-being by 2024, i.e. the end of the current presidential Science 636 $10 Small Business Development 482 $7 term. Digital Economy 1,635 $25 ▪ Is this a return to Soviet-style planning? For some of the NPs, Labour productivity 52 $1 Export Support 957 $15 especially those involving infrastructure, it certainly looks like it.
    [Show full text]
  • British and World Orders, Medals and Decorations Russian Medals, Badges, Orders, Decorations and Coins
    British and World Orders, Medals and Decorations Russian Medals, Badges, Orders, Decorations and Coins To be sold by auction at: Sotheby’s, in the Book Room 34-35 New Bond Street London W1A 2AA Day of Sale: Thursday 10 June 2010 at 10.30 am, 11 am and 3 pm Public viewing: 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Monday 7 June 10 am to 4.30 pm Tuesday 8 June 10 am to 4.30 pm Wednesday 9 June 10 am to 4.30 pm Or by previous appointment. Catalogue no. 44 Price £10 Enquiries: Stephen Lloyd, Paul Wood or James Morton Cover illustrations: Lot 74 (front); Lot 354 part (back); Lot 27 (inside front); Lot 240 (inside back) in association with 45 Maddox Street, London W1S 2PE Tel.: +44 (0)20 7493 5344 Fax: +44 (0)20 7495 6325 Email: [email protected] Website: www.mortonandeden.com This auction is conducted by Morton & Eden Ltd in accordance with our Conditions of Business printed at the back of this catalogue. All questions and comments relating to the operation of this sale or to its content should be addressed to Morton & Eden Ltd and not to Sotheby’s. Online Bidding Morton & Eden Ltd offer an online bidding service via www.the-saleroom.com. This is provided on the understanding that Morton & Eden Ltd shall not be responsible for errors or failures to execute internet bids for reasons including but not limited to: i) a loss of internet connection by either party; ii) a breakdown or other problems with the online bidding software; iii) a breakdown or other problems with your computer, system or internet connection.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report - 2012
    Annual report - 2012 Contents Address of Victor F. Rashnikov, Chairman of OJSC MMK's Board of Directors ...... 3 The main results of 2012 ............................................................................. 5 Main Events of 2012 .................................................................................... 6 The Company's Mission, Strategy and Growth Prospects .................................. 8 B. Dubrovsky, General Director of OJSC MMK, on the Results of 2012 and Strategic Tasks Faced by the Company ........................................................ 12 MMK Group .............................................................................................. 14 Company’s Sales ....................................................................................... 15 Material and technical supply ...................................................................... 24 Company’s Production Activity .................................................................... 28 Overview of the financial position of the company ......................................... 32 Internal Control System ............................................................................. 41 Risk Management ...................................................................................... 43 Corporate Social Responsibility ................................................................... 45 The Company's HR Policy ........................................................................... 47 Labour safety ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • RUSSIA and CHINA and Central Asia Programme at ISPI
    RUSSIA AND CHINA. ANATOMY OF A A PARTNERSHIP OF AND RUSSIA CHINA. ANATOMY Aldo Ferrari While the “decline of the West” is now almost taken is Head of the Russia, Caucasus for granted, China’s impressive economic performance RUSSIA AND CHINA and Central Asia Programme at ISPI. and the political influence of an assertive Russia in the international arena are combining to make Eurasia a key Founded in 1934, ISPI is Eleonora Tafuro Ambrosetti Anatomy of a Partnership hub of political and economic power. That, certainly, an independent think tank is a Research Fellow committed to the study of is the story which Beijing and Moscow have been telling at the Russia, Caucasus and international political and Central Asia Centre at ISPI. for years. edited by Aldo Ferrari and Eleonora Tafuro Ambrosetti economic dynamics. Are the times ripe for a “Eurasian world order”? What It is the only Italian Institute exactly does the supposed Sino-Russian challenge to introduction by Paolo Magri – and one of the very few in the liberal world entail? Are the two countries’ worsening Europe – to combine research clashes with the West drawing them closer together? activities with a significant This ISPI Report tackles every aspect of the apparently commitment to training, events, solidifying alliance between Moscow and Beijing, but also and global risk analysis for points out its growing asymmetries. It also recommends companies and institutions. some policies that could help the EU to deal with this ISPI favours an interdisciplinary “Eurasian shift”, a long-term and multi-faceted power and policy-oriented approach made possible by a research readjustment that may lead to the end of the world team of over 50 analysts and as we have known it.
    [Show full text]
  • Panorama People Interview
    279 PANORAMA PEOPLE INTERVIEW With Minister of Health of the Russian Federation Veronika Skvortsova 1. Like many other countries in the WHO European We started active work on the development of individual Region, the Russian Federation is facing an epidemic of preventive approaches in 2013 with the launch of mass health noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). What in your opinion screenings – the reintroduction of the standard health assessment are the main successes and problems in this area for programme. Preventive examinations and standard health the Russian Federation? What are the priority areas for assessments were carried out on 48.5 million people in 2017, combating NCDs in your country? which is 1.5 times higher than in 2013. The plan is to increase this figure to 80 million by 2021, and over 100 million by 2024. Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death in Russia and around the world. This is why it is no The comprehensive nature of the measures we have adopted coincidence that combating NCDs is one of the top priorities has allowed us to achieve impressive results in a short space for the Russian Federation in both its foreign and domestic of time. As of the end of 2017, the average life expectancy in policies. our country stood at 72.7 years, which is 2.5 years more than in 2012 and 5 years more than in 2007. In 2017, the mortality The main effect in terms of reducing the burden of NCDs is rate in the Russian Federation was the lowest it had been for 20 achieved through the implementation of a comprehensive years, at 12.4 deaths per 1000 population.
    [Show full text]
  • The Militarization of the Russian Elite Under Putin What We Know, What We Think We Know (But Don’T), and What We Need to Know
    Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 65, no. 4, 2018, 221–232 Copyright © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1075-8216 (print)/1557-783X (online) DOI: 10.1080/10758216.2017.1295812 The Militarization of the Russian Elite under Putin What We Know, What We Think We Know (but Don’t), and What We Need to Know David W. Rivera and Sharon Werning Rivera Department of Government, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY This article reviews the vast literature on Russia’s transformation into a “militocracy”—a state in which individuals with career experience in Russia’s various force structures occupy important positions throughout the polity and economy—during the reign of former KGB lieutenant colonel Vladimir Putin. We show that (1) elite militarization has been extensively utilized both to describe and explain core features of Russian foreign and domestic policy; and (2) notwithstanding its widespread usage, the militocracy framework rests on a rather thin, and in some cases flawed, body of empirical research. We close by discussing the remaining research agenda on this subject and listing several alternative theoretical frameworks to which journalists and policymakers arguably should pay equal or greater attention. In analyses of Russia since Vladimir Putin came to I was an officer for almost twenty years. And this is my own power at the start of the millennium, this master narrative milieu.… I relate to individuals from the security organs, from the Ministry of Defense, or from the special services as has been replaced by an entirely different set of themes. ’ if I were a member of this collective. —Vladimir Putin One such theme is Putin s successful campaign to remove (“Dovol’stvie voennykh vyrastet v razy” 2011) the oligarchs from high politics (via prison sentences, if necessary) and renationalize key components of the nat- In the 1990s, scholarly and journalistic analyses of Russia ural resource sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS LETTER Weekly
    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody February 7, 2019 Issue No. 2019/05 Company News En+ Group says finishes 1st stage of securities swap with Glencore On February 1, 2019 it was reported that En+ Group fulfilled the first stage of a securities exchange with Swiss trader Glencore. As a result, En+ Group bought a 2% stake in aluminum producer RUSAL from an affiliate of Glencore and raised its stake to 50.12%. A transfer of a 6.75% RUSAL stake to En+Group must be made automatically no later than February 2020. In April 2018, the U.S. imposed sanctions against 38 Russian tycoons, government officials and companies, including Oleg Deripaska and companies he controlled - En+ Group, RUSAL, and power producer EuroSibEnergo. In January, Deripaska transferred control over the companies, and his representatives were removed from their board of directors, and the Treasury lifted the sanctions on January 27. As a result, Deripaska owns 44.95% of En+ Group and has the right to vote with a 35% stake, VTB holds 21.68% of the shares and has the right to vote with a 7.35% stake, Citi is a nominal owner of 10.55%, which trader Glencore received in exchange for 8.75% in RUSAL; Citi owns 4.54%, but the right to vote belongs to institutional and retail investors. They also own 4.88%, and can manage a 9.42% combined stake. The members of Deripaska’s family hold 6.75%, charity fund Volnoye Delo 3.22%, other minority shareholders 3.42%. Independent managers have the right to manage the stakes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Russia: President Putin's Visit to Japan
    Chapter 6 Russia: President Putin’s Visit to Japan Hiroshi Yamazoe (lead author, Sections 1 (3), 2 (1) & (2), and 3 (1) & (3)) and Shigeki Akimoto (Sections 1 (1) & (2), 2 (3), and 3 (2)) ussia currently faces not only severe economic and financial conditions, Rbut also an ongoing confrontation with the Western nations stemming from the Ukraine crisis. Amid this situation, the Kremlin is seen to be pursuing carefully thought-out policies on both the domestic and foreign relations fronts from the perspective of governance over the medium-to-long term. In the election of deputies of the State Duma (the lower house of the Federal Assembly of Russia) held in September 2016, the ruling United Russia party won an overwhelming majority of seats. During the year, the administration also demonstrated its willingness to elevate younger officials to positions of influence. These developments could imply that President Vladimir Putin has begun laying the groundwork for a political framework that will enable the administration to continue functioning effectively even if he himself leaves the political arena. On the diplomatic front, while the situation remains tense in Eastern Europe, the Putin administration continues to take steps to enhance Russia’s presence on the international stage through military operations and diplomatic negotiations relating to the Syrian crisis. While welcoming the start of the new administration of President Donald Trump—who has been calling for better relations with Russia—the Putin administration shows no signs of abandoning its cautious stance regarding concrete steps toward the normalization of relations between the two countries. In its relationships with the nations of East Asia, the Kremlin continues to seek stronger working relations with China, which it regards as an important partner, while at the same time taking steps to avoid an over-reliance on China and to build a sustainable relationship with Japan.
    [Show full text]