DOCSLIB.ORG

Boise District Office Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-Grouse Habitat Project (BOSH)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boise District Office Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-Grouse Habitat Project (BOSH) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management DRAFT Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS Boise District Office Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project (BOSH) November 2016 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Boise District Office 3948 Development Avenue Boise, ID 83705 Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project Draft EIS DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS Page i Environmental Impact Statement # DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS (Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project) Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Need for and Purpose of Action ....................................................................................... 3 1.2 Location and Setting......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Scoping and Development of Issues ................................................................................ 6 1.4 Conformance with Applicable Land Use Plan(s) ............................................................. 6 1.5 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, and Other Requirements ...................................... 7 2.0 Description of the Alternatives ......................................................................................... 11 2.1 Alternatives Considered But Not Analyzed in Detail .................................................... 11 2.2 Description of Proposed Action and Alternatives .......................................................... 12 2.2.1 Alternative A - No Action/Continue Present Management .................................... 12 2.2.2 Features Common to Action Alternatives............................................................... 12 2.2.2.1 Project Area Development............................................................................... 12 2.2.2.2 Focal Treatment Area Development ................................................................ 12 2.2.2.3 Annual Treatment Unit Development ............................................................. 13 2.2.2.4 Monitoring ....................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2.5 Methods ........................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2.6 Design Features ............................................................................................... 18 2.2.3 Alternative B – Proposed Action ............................................................................ 20 2.2.4 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness ......................................................... 23 3.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................................... 23 3.1 Fire Behavior .................................................................................................................. 25 3.1.1 Affected Environment – Fire Behavior................................................................... 25 3.1.2 Environmental Consequences – Fire Behavior ....................................................... 27 3.1.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 27 3.1.2.2 Alternative B – Proposed Action ..................................................................... 27 3.1.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 28 3.1.3 Cumulative Impacts – Fire Behavior ...................................................................... 28 3.2 Soils ................................................................................................................................ 28 3.2.1 Affected Environment – Soils ................................................................................. 28 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences – Soils ..................................................................... 31 3.2.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 32 3.2.2.2 Alternative B – Proposed Action ..................................................................... 32 3.2.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 33 3.2.3 Cumulative Impacts – Soils .................................................................................... 33 3.2.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 33 3.2.3.2 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 33 3.2.3.3 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 34 3.2.3.4 Alternatives B & C – Cumulative Impacts ...................................................... 35 3.3 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................... 35 3.3.1 Affected Environment – Vegetation ....................................................................... 35 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences – Vegetation ........................................................... 37 3.3.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 38 Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project Draft EIS DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS Page ii 3.3.2.2 Alternative B – Proposed Action ..................................................................... 38 3.3.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 39 3.3.3 Cumulative Impacts – Vegetation ........................................................................... 39 3.3.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 39 3.3.3.2 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 39 3.3.3.3 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 41 3.3.3.4 Alternatives B and C – Cumulative Impacts ................................................... 41 3.4 Special Status Plants....................................................................................................... 42 3.4.1 Affected Environment – Special Status Plants ....................................................... 42 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences – Special Status Plants............................................ 45 3.4.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 45 3.4.2.2 Alternative B – Proposed Action ..................................................................... 45 3.4.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 46 3.4.3 Cumulative Impacts – Special Status Plants ........................................................... 46 3.4.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 46 3.4.3.2 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 46 3.4.3.3 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 48 3.4.3.4 Alternatives B and C – Cumulative Impacts ................................................... 48 3.5 Noxious Weeds .............................................................................................................. 48 3.5.1 Affected Environment – Noxious Weeds ............................................................... 48 3.5.2 Environmental Impacts – Noxious Weeds .............................................................. 49 3.5.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 50 3.5.2.2 Alternative B – Proposed Action ..................................................................... 50 3.5.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 51 3.5.3 Cumulative Impacts – Noxious Weeds ................................................................... 51 3.5.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 51 3.5.3.2 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 51 3.5.3.3 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 52 3.5.3.4 Alternatives B and C – Cumulative Impacts ................................................... 52 3.6 Wildlife/Special Status Animals .................................................................................... 52 3.6.1 Affected Environment – Wildlife/Special Status Animals ..................................... 52 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences – Wildlife/Special Status Species ........................... 59 3.6.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ..............................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Statement of Mike Pool Acting Deputy Director for Operations Bureau of Land Management U.S
    Statement of Mike Pool Acting Deputy Director for Operations Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of the Interior Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining S. 1167, Owyhee Wilderness Areas Boundary Modifications Act April 21, 2016 Thank you for inviting the Department of the Interior to testify on S. 1167, the Owyhee Wilderness Areas Boundary Modifications Act. This bill would modify the boundaries of the Pole Creek, Owyhee River, and North Fork Owyhee Wilderness Areas; authorize the use of motorized vehicles for livestock monitoring, herding, and gathering in six wilderness areas in Idaho; and require the Secretary of the Interior to submit a report describing livestock grazing management activities that were authorized in these six areas prior to their designation as wilderness in 2009. The BLM acknowledges the dedicated efforts of stakeholders to collaborate on issues concerning wilderness management in this region of Idaho. Generally, the BLM supports stakeholder-driven efforts to refine management boundaries, provided those solutions further the purposes of the original enabling legislation and represent a balanced approach to enhancing manageability. The Administration, however, strongly opposes S. 1167, because of broad management changes that would lift essential protections from wilderness areas. In particular, we oppose provisions for the use of motorized vehicles in wilderness areas because the language undermines the longstanding definition and spirit of wilderness
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Owyhee Canyonlands: a Look Back and Ahead - 10 Another Fantastic Wild Idaho! in the Books - 16 Cover: Owhyee Evening by ICL Artist in Residence Carl Rowe
    Vol XXII No II July 2019 FEATURING Bold Action Needed for Idaho’s Salmon and Steelhead - 4 Owyhee Canyonlands: A Look Back and Ahead - 10 Another Fantastic Wild Idaho! in the Books - 16 Cover: Owhyee Evening by ICL Artist in Residence Carl Rowe. Oil on canvas, www.carlroweart.com. FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS Lori Gibson Banducci, Chair, Boise Rebecca Patton, Vice Chair, Hailey Judy Baker, Treasurer, Boise Bill Weppner, Secretary, Boise Tanya Anderson, Victor Patrick Bageant, Boise Matt Benjamin, Ketchum We Can Protect Carolyn Coiner, Twin Falls toget her, Paul Cunningham, Boise Idaho... Jim DeWitt, Boise As summer arrives, many of us will take to the David Eichberg, Boise Scott Friedman, Sun Valley backcountry with family and friends. It could be a Alan Harper, Athol day hike near home, or maybe an overnighter at the Steve Lockwood, Sandpoint other end of the state. Maybe you’ll cast a line, see a Jim Norton, Boise John O’Connor, Bonners Ferry sandhill crane, or find an elk shed. Julie Richardson, Hailey Jerry Scheid, Idaho Falls Summer will always remind me of floating the Middle Kim Trotter, Driggs Fork of the Salmon with my two kids. My oldest Margrit von Braun, Moscow Glenn Oakley Photo Glenn Oakley will leave Boise to go away to college this fall. My Justin Hayes daughter has two years left of high school. Our STAFF chances to spend time together are becoming scarce as they become adults, Jenny Estes Development Director but I know we’ll always share those uniquely Idaho moments. Amanda Gardner Development Assistant Justin Hayes That place you love and the people you share it with — are special.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DEPARTMENT of the INTERIOR Bureau Of
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/20/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-08928, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [15XL LLIDB00100 LF1000000.HT0000 LXSS020D0000 241A 4500075005] Notice of Availability of the Final Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness and Wild & Scenic Rivers Management Plan, Idaho AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. SUMMARY: In accordance with the Wilderness Act of 1964 and the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has signed a Decision Record implementing the Final Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness and Wild & Scenic Rivers Management Plan (Plan), and by this notice is announcing its availability. DATES: Any party adversely affected will have 30 days from the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register to appeal the BLM’s decision to the Interior Board of Land Appeals pursuant to 43 CFR part 4. ADDRESSES: An electronic version of the Plan may be found online at: http://www.blm.gov/id/st/en/prog/nepa_register/Owyhee-wilderness-WSR_plan.html. Interested parties may also view a copy of the Plan at the BLM Owyhee Field Office, 20 First Avenue West, Marsing, Idaho 83639; the BLM Boise District Office, 3948 Development Avenue, Boise, Idaho 83705; the BLM Twin Falls District Office, 2536 1 Kimberly Road, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301; the BLM Idaho State Office, 1387 South Vinnell Way, Boise, Idaho 83709; and at local libraries in Boise, Gooding, Grand View, Mountain Home, Murphy, and Nampa, Idaho; and Jordan Valley, Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Owyhee Land Exchange
    Owyhee Land Exchange Owyhee Canyonlands Reasons for the Land Exchange Between the State of Idaho Wilderness and Bureau of Land Management As a result of the Owyhee Canyonlands Wilderness designation, there are rules and reg- The Owyhee Canyonlands ulations that affect the management, use, and occupancy of wilderness areas. Specifi- Wilderness Areas are part of cally, the wilderness areas shall be managed in accordance with the Wilderness Act of September 3, 1964 (“Act”), which generally prohibits commercial enterprise and per- the 109 million acre Nation- manent roads. However, there are private and state owned inholdings, within the wil- al Wilderness Preservation derness, that do not fall under the same restrictions. As such, transitioning state own- System. This System of ership out of the wilderness areas aligns with the Act’s purpose and intent. lands provides clean air, wa- The state’s goals are: ter, and habitat critical for To reduce management risk, cost, and restrictions faced by the Endowments by rare and endangered plants disposing of lands within sage grouse habitat and within the wilderness areas. and animals. To secure legal access to State Endowment Trust lands. The United States Congress To reduce management costs by consolidating State Endowment Trust lands. designated six wilderness areas in Owyhee County: Both IDL and BLM will acquire lands better suited to their missions and objectives. 1. Big Jacks Creek Wilder- ness Area, 2. Bruneau-Jarbidge Rivers Wilderness Area, 3. Little Jacks Creek Wilder- ness Area, 4. North Fork Owyhee Wil- derness Area, 5. Owyhee River Wilderness Area, and 6. Pole Creek Wilderness Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1480 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1113 (Pub
    § 1113 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1480 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 13, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation § 1113. Authorization of appropriations System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- There are hereby authorized to be appro- priations be available for additional personnel priated to the Department of the Interior with- stated as being required solely for the purpose of out fiscal year limitation such sums as may be managing or administering areas solely because necessary for the purposes of this chapter and they are included within the National Wilder- the agreement with the Government of Canada ness Preservation System. signed January 22, 1964, article 11 of which pro- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined vides that the Governments of the United States A wilderness, in contrast with those areas and Canada shall share equally the costs of de- where man and his own works dominate the veloping and the annual cost of operating and landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where maintaining the Roosevelt Campobello Inter- the earth and its community of life are un- national Park. trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- (Pub. L. 88–363, § 14, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness is further defined to mean in this chapter an CHAPTER 23—NATIONAL WILDERNESS area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its PRESERVATION SYSTEM primeval character and influence, without per- manent improvements or human habitation, Sec. which is protected and managed so as to pre- 1131.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 116-9—Mar
    AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENTS^ INFORMATION ' > GPQ^r PUBLIC LAW 116-9—MAR. 12, 2019 JOHN D. DINGELL, JR. CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT, AND RECREATION ACT Public Law 116-9 116th Congress An Act Mar. 12, 2019 To provide for the management of the natural resources of the United States, [S. 47] and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of John D. the United States of America in Congress assembled, Dingell, Jr. Conservation, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management, and Recreation (a) Short Title.—This Act may be cited as the “John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act”. 16 USC 1 note. (b) Table of Contents.—The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary. TITLE I—PUBLIC LAND AND FORESTS Subtitle A—Land Exchanges and Conveyances Sec. 1001. Crags land exchange, Colorado. Sec. 1002. Arapaho National Forest boundary adjustment. Sec. 1003. Santa Ana River Wash Plan land exchange. Sec. 1004. Udall Park land exchange. Sec. 1005. Confirmation of State land grants. Sec. 1006. Custer County Airport conveyance. Sec. 1007. Pascua Yaqui Tribe land conveyance. Sec. 1008. La Paz County land conveyance. Sec. 1009. Lake Bistineau land title stability. Sec. 1010. Lake Fannin land conveyance. Sec. 1011. Land conveyance and utility right-of-way, Henry’s Lake Wilderness Study Area, Idaho. Sec. 1012. Conveyance to Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation. Sec. 1013. Public purpose conveyance to City of Hyde Park, Utah. Sec. 1014. Juab County conveyance. Sec. 1015. Black Mountain Range and Bullhead City land exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section N
    N-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine Indians of North America—Languages Naar family (Not Subd Geog) USE Trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine West (U.S.)—Languages UF Nahar family N-3 fatty acids NT Athapascan languages Narr family USE Omega-3 fatty acids Eyak language Naardermeer (Netherlands : Reserve) N-6 fatty acids Haida language UF Natuurgebied Naardermeer (Netherlands) USE Omega-6 fatty acids Tlingit language BT Natural areas—Netherlands N.113 (Jet fighter plane) Na family (Not Subd Geog) Naas family USE Scimitar (Jet fighter plane) Na Guardis Island (Spain) USE Nassau family N.A.M.A. (Native American Music Awards) USE Guardia Island (Spain) Naassenes USE Native American Music Awards Na Hang Nature Reserve (Vietnam) [BT1437] N-acetylhomotaurine USE Khu bảo tồn thiên nhiên Nà Hang (Vietnam) BT Gnosticism USE Acamprosate Na-hsi (Chinese people) Nāatas N Bar N Ranch (Mont.) USE Naxi (Chinese people) USE Navayats BT Ranches—Montana Na-hsi language Naath (African people) N Bar Ranch (Mont.) USE Naxi language USE Nuer (African people) BT Ranches—Montana Na Ih Es (Apache rite) Naath language N-benzylpiperazine USE Changing Woman Ceremony (Apache rite) USE Nuer language USE Benzylpiperazine Na-Kara language Naaude language n-body problem USE Nakara language USE Ayiwo language USE Many-body problem Na-khi (Chinese people) Nab River (Germany) N-butyl methacrylate USE Naxi (Chinese people) USE Naab River (Germany) USE Butyl methacrylate Na-khi language Nabā, Jabal (Jordan) N.C. 12 (N.C.) USE Naxi language USE Nebo, Mount (Jordan) USE North Carolina
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Management Provisions in Federal Wilderness Law
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2017 FIRE MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS IN FEDERAL WILDERNESS LAW Erik D. Alnes The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Alnes, Erik D., "FIRE MANAGEMENT PROVISIONS IN FEDERAL WILDERNESS LAW" (2017). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11087. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11087 This Professional Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fire Management Provisions in Federal Wilderness Law By Erik D. Alnes Professional Paper Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Resource Conservation The University of Montana Missoula, MT 2017 Committee Members: Martin Nie (Chair), Carl Seielstad (Franke College of Forestry and Conservation), Sara Rinfret (College of Humanities and Sciences) TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 207/Monday, October 26, 2020
    67818 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION All submissions received must include 1. General Operation and Maintenance AGENCY the Docket ID No. for this rulemaking. 2. Biofouling Management Comments received may be posted 3. Oil Management 40 CFR Part 139 without change to https:// 4. Training and Education B. Discharges Incidental to the Normal [EPA–HQ–OW–2019–0482; FRL–10015–54– www.regulations.gov, including any Operation of a Vessel—Specific OW] personal information provided. For Standards detailed instructions on sending 1. Ballast Tanks RIN 2040–AF92 comments and additional information 2. Bilges on the rulemaking process, see the 3. Boilers Vessel Incidental Discharge National 4. Cathodic Protection Standards of Performance ‘‘General Information’’ heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 5. Chain Lockers 6. Decks AGENCY: Environmental Protection this document. Out of an abundance of 7. Desalination and Purification Systems Agency (EPA). caution for members of the public and 8. Elevator Pits ACTION: Proposed rule. our staff, the EPA Docket Center and 9. Exhaust Gas Emission Control Systems Reading Room are closed to the public, 10. Fire Protection Equipment SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental with limited exceptions, to reduce the 11. Gas Turbines Protection Agency (EPA) is publishing risk of transmitting COVID–19. Our 12. Graywater Systems for public comment a proposed rule Docket Center staff will continue to 13. Hulls and Associated Niche Areas under the Vessel Incidental Discharge provide remote customer service via 14. Inert Gas Systems Act that would establish national email, phone, and webform. We 15. Motor Gasoline and Compensating standards of performance for marine Systems encourage the public to submit 16.
    [Show full text]