DOCSLIB.ORG

Boise District Office Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-Grouse Habitat Project (BOSH)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boise District Office Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-Grouse Habitat Project (BOSH) U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Final Environmental Impact Statement DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS Boise District Office Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project (BOSH) February 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Boise District Office 3948 Development Avenue Boise, ID 83705 Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project Final EIS DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS Page i Environmental Impact Statement # DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS (Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project) Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Need for and Purpose of Action........................................................................ 3 1.2 Location and Setting ......................................................................................... 3 1.3 Scoping and Development of Issues ................................................................. 5 1.4 Notable Changes between the Draft and Final EIS .......................................... 6 1.5 Conformance with Applicable Land Use Plan(s) ............................................. 7 1.6 Relationship to Statutes, Regulations, and Other Requirements ...................... 9 2.0 Description of the Alternatives ....................................................................... 12 2.1 Alternative A - No Action/Continue Present Management ............................ 12 2.2 Features Common to All Action Alternatives ................................................ 13 2.2.1 Project Development ....................................................................................... 13 2.2.2 Focal Treatment Area Development ............................................................... 13 2.2.3 Annual Project Development – Treatment Units ............................................ 16 2.2.4 Methods........................................................................................................... 17 2.2.5 Design Features ............................................................................................... 20 2.2.6 Treatment Maintenance .................................................................................. 25 2.2.7 Monitoring ...................................................................................................... 25 2.2.8 Adaptive Management and Goals ................................................................... 26 2.3 Comparison of Action Alternatives ................................................................ 27 2.4 Alternative B – Treatment Including Wilderness ........................................... 27 2.5 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness ................................................. 28 2.6 Alternative C1 – Preferred Alternative ........................................................... 28 2.7 Alternatives Considered but Not Analyzed in Detail ..................................... 29 3.0 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences ............................. 30 3.1 Soils................................................................................................................. 33 3.1.1 Affected Environment – Soils ......................................................................... 33 3.1.2 Environmental Consequences – Soils ............................................................. 37 3.1.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 39 3.1.2.2 Alternative B – Treatment Including Wilderness ............................................ 39 3.1.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 41 3.1.2.4 Alternative C1 – Preferred Alternative ............................................................ 41 3.1.3 Cumulative Impacts – Soils ............................................................................ 42 3.1.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 42 3.1.3.2 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 43 3.1.3.3 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 44 3.1.3.4 Alternative B – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 45 3.1.3.5 Alternative C – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 45 3.1.3.6 Alternative C1 – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................. 45 3.2 Vegetation ....................................................................................................... 45 3.2.1 Affected Environment – Vegetation ............................................................... 45 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences – Vegetation ................................................... 50 Bruneau-Owyhee Sage-grouse Habitat Project Final EIS DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2014-0002-EIS Page ii 3.2.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 52 3.2.2.2 Alternative B – Treatment Including Wilderness ............................................ 52 3.2.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 53 3.2.2.4 Alternative C1 – Preferred Alternative ............................................................ 54 3.2.3 Cumulative Impacts – Vegetation ................................................................... 54 3.2.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 54 3.2.3.1 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 55 3.2.3.2 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 57 3.2.3.3 Alternative B – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 57 3.2.3.1 Alternative C – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 57 3.2.3.2 Alternative C1 – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................. 57 3.3 Special Status Plants ....................................................................................... 58 3.3.1 Affected Environment – Special Status Plants ............................................... 58 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences – Special Status Plants.................................... 61 3.3.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 62 3.3.2.2 Alternative B – Treatment Including Wilderness ............................................ 62 3.3.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 63 3.3.2.1 Alternative C1 – Preferred Alternative ............................................................ 63 3.3.3 Cumulative Impacts – Special Status Plants ................................................... 63 3.3.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 63 3.3.3.2 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 63 3.3.3.3 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 64 3.3.3.4 Alternatives B and C – Cumulative Impacts ................................................... 65 3.3.3.5 Alternative C1 – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................. 65 3.4 Noxious Weeds ............................................................................................... 65 3.4.1 Affected Environment – Noxious Weeds ....................................................... 65 3.4.2 Environmental Impacts – Noxious Weeds ...................................................... 66 3.4.2.1 Alternative A – No Action ............................................................................... 67 3.4.2.2 Alternative B –Treatment Including Wilderness ............................................. 67 3.4.2.3 Alternative C – No Treatment in Wilderness .................................................. 68 3.4.2.4 Alternative C1 – Preferred Alternative ............................................................ 68 3.4.3 Cumulative Impacts – Noxious Weeds ........................................................... 68 3.4.3.1 Scope of Analysis ............................................................................................ 68 3.4.3.2 Current Conditions and Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................................................................................................ 69 3.4.3.3 Alternative A – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................... 70 3.4.3.4 Alternatives B and C – Cumulative Impacts ................................................... 70 3.4.3.5 Alternative C1 – Cumulative Impacts ............................................................. 70 3.5 Wildlife/Special Status Animals ..................................................................... 70 3.5.1 Affected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fact Sheet for the Draft NPDES General Permit for Suction Dredge
    FACT SHEET The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Plans To Reissue A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit To: Small Suction Dredge Miners in Idaho and the State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Proposes to Certify under Clean Water Act (CWA) § 401 Public Comment Start Date: December 13, 2017 Public Comment Expiration Date: January 29, 2018 Technical Contact Name: Cindi Godsey Phone: (206) 553-1676 Email: [email protected] EPA Proposes NPDES Permit Reissuance EPA proposes to reissue an NPDES General Permit (GP) to small suction dredgers operating in Idaho. Small suction dredges are limited to an intake nozzle size of 5 inches in diameter or less (or the diametrical equivalent defined in the GP) and equipment rated at 15 horsepower or less. The draft GP sets conditions on the discharge - or release - of pollutants from these operations into waters of the United States. This Fact Sheet includes: - Information on public comment, public hearings, and appeal procedures - a description of the industry - a description of draft GP conditions - background information supporting the conditions in the draft GP The State of Idaho CWA § 401 Certification Upon EPA’s request, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) has provided a draft certification of the permit under CWA § 401. Persons wishing to comment on State Certification should submit written comments by the public notice expiration date to Nicole Deinarowicz, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, 1410 N. Hilton Boise, Idaho 83706. Ms. Deinarowicz may be reached by phone at (208) 373-0591 or by e-mail at [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Track of the Yellowstone Hot Spot: Volcanism, Faulting, and Uplift
    Geological Society of America Memoir 179 1992 Chapter 1 The track of the Yellowstone hot spot: Volcanism, faulting, and uplift Kenneth L. Pierce and Lisa A. Morgan US. Geological Survey, MS 913, Box 25046, Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 ABSTRACT The track of the Yellowstone hot spot is represented by a systematic northeast-trending linear belt of silicic, caldera-forming volcanism that arrived at Yel- lowstone 2 Ma, was near American Falls, Idaho about 10 Ma, and started about 16 Ma near the Nevada-Oregon-Idaho border. From 16 to 10 Ma, particularly 16 to 14 Ma, volcanism was widely dispersed around the inferred hot-spot track in a region that now forms a moderately high volcanic plateau. From 10 to 2 Ma, silicic volcanism migrated N54OE toward Yellowstone at about 3 cm/year, leaving in its wake the topographic and structural depression of the eastern Snake River Plain (SRP). This <lo-Ma hot-spot track has the same rate and direction as that predicted by motion of the North American plate over a thermal plume fixed in the mantle. The eastern SRP is a linear, mountain- bounded, 90-km-wide trench almost entirely(?) floored by calderas that are thinly cov- ered by basalt flows. The current hot-spot position at Yellowstone is spatially related to active faulting and uplift. Basin-and-range faults in the Yellowstone-SRP region are classified into six types based on both recency of offset and height of the associated bedrock escarpment. The distribution of these fault types permits definition of three adjoining belts of faults and a pattern of waxing, culminating, and waning fault activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild and Scenic Rivers Act.Xml
    G:\COMP\PARKS\WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT.XML WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT [Public Law 90–542; Approved October 2, 1968] [As Amended Through P.L. 116–9, Enacted March 12, 2019] øCurrency: This publication is a compilation of the text of Public Law 90–542. It was last amended by the public law listed in the As Amended Through note above and below at the bottom of each page of the pdf version and reflects current law through the date of the enactment of the public law listed at https:// www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/comps/¿ øNote: While this publication does not represent an official version of any Federal statute, substantial efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of its contents. The official version of Federal law is found in the United States Statutes at Large and in the United States Code. The legal effect to be given to the Statutes at Large and the United States Code is established by statute (1 U.S.C. 112, 204).¿ AN ACT To provide a National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That ø16 U.S.C. 1271¿ (a) this Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild and Scenic Rivers Act’’. (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their imme- diate environments, possess outstandingly remarkable scenic rec- reational, geologic fish and wildlife, historic, cultural or other simi- lar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolved by the Senate and House Of
    906 PUBLIC LAW 90-541-0CT. I, 1968 [82 STAT. Public Law 90-541 October 1, 1968 JOINT RESOLUTION [H.J. Res, 1461] Making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 1969, and for other purposes. Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatimes of tlie United Continuing ap­ propriations, States of America in Congress assernbled, That clause (c) of section 1969. 102 of the joint resolution of June 29, 1968 (Public Law 90-366), is Ante, p. 475. hereby further amended by striking out "September 30, 1968" and inserting in lieu thereof "October 12, 1968". Approved October 1, 1968. Public Law 90-542 October 2, 1968 AN ACT ------[S. 119] To proYide for a Xational Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purPoses. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the Wild and Scenic United States of America in Congress assembled, That (a) this Act Rivers Act. may be cited as the "vVild and Scenic Rivers Act". (b) It is hereby declared to be the policy of the United States that certain selected rivers of the Nation which, with their immediate environments, possess outstandin~ly remarkable scenic, recreational, geologic, fish and wildlife, historic, cultural, or other similar values, shall be preserved in free-flowing condition, and that they and their immediate environments shall be protected for the benefit and enjoy­ ment of l?resent and future generations. The Congress declares that the established national policy of dam and other construction at appro­ priate sections of the rivers of the United States needs to be com­ plemented by a policy that would preserve other selected rivers or sections thereof m their free-flowing condition to protect the water quality of such rivers and to fulfill other vital national conservation purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Mike Pool Acting Deputy Director for Operations Bureau of Land Management U.S
    Statement of Mike Pool Acting Deputy Director for Operations Bureau of Land Management U.S. Department of the Interior Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining S. 1167, Owyhee Wilderness Areas Boundary Modifications Act April 21, 2016 Thank you for inviting the Department of the Interior to testify on S. 1167, the Owyhee Wilderness Areas Boundary Modifications Act. This bill would modify the boundaries of the Pole Creek, Owyhee River, and North Fork Owyhee Wilderness Areas; authorize the use of motorized vehicles for livestock monitoring, herding, and gathering in six wilderness areas in Idaho; and require the Secretary of the Interior to submit a report describing livestock grazing management activities that were authorized in these six areas prior to their designation as wilderness in 2009. The BLM acknowledges the dedicated efforts of stakeholders to collaborate on issues concerning wilderness management in this region of Idaho. Generally, the BLM supports stakeholder-driven efforts to refine management boundaries, provided those solutions further the purposes of the original enabling legislation and represent a balanced approach to enhancing manageability. The Administration, however, strongly opposes S. 1167, because of broad management changes that would lift essential protections from wilderness areas. In particular, we oppose provisions for the use of motorized vehicles in wilderness areas because the language undermines the longstanding definition and spirit of wilderness
    [Show full text]
  • Owyhee River Study Report, Idaho
    ./Mtt.1 ~11:. ?9,/$5¥;1~ As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interests of all our people. The Department also has a major respon- sibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U. S. Administration. U. S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary National Park Service William J. Whalen, Director OWYHEE WILD & SCENIC RIVER STUDY Fl NAL REPORT /ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT Department of the Interior Nati ona I Park service March 1979 - I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. INTRODUCTION • 1 I. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL 4 Administration • .• 10 Acquisition and Development 11 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT • 13 Regional Setting • 13 Physical Features 13 Climate 13 Population • 14 Economy 14 Transportation Facilities 16 Recreation • 16 Description of the Owyhee River Study Area • 20 Location and Physical Condition 20 Geology 22 Minerals • 22 Geothermal Activity 26 Soils 26 Vegetation • 26 Fish and Wildlife 29 Hydrology and Water Resource Development • 30 Water Quality 32 Land Ownership • 35 Land Use • 36 i Water Rights . 39 Access to River . 40 Archeological and Historical Values . 40 Recreation Resources . 44 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Law 111-11
    PUBLIC LAW 111–11—MAR. 30, 2009 123 STAT. 991 Public Law 111–11 111th Congress An Act To designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Mar. 30, 2009 Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes. [H.R. 146] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, Omnibus Public Land SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. Management Act (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Omnibus of 2009. Public Land Management Act of 2009’’. 16 USC 1 note. (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. TITLE I—ADDITIONS TO THE NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRESERVATION SYSTEM Subtitle A—Wild Monongahela Wilderness Sec. 1001. Designation of wilderness, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Sec. 1002. Boundary adjustment, Laurel Fork South Wilderness, Monongahela Na­ tional Forest. Sec. 1003. Monongahela National Forest boundary confirmation. Sec. 1004. Enhanced Trail Opportunities. Subtitle B—Virginia Ridge and Valley Wilderness Sec. 1101. Definitions. Sec. 1102. Designation of additional National Forest System land in Jefferson Na­ tional Forest as wilderness or a wilderness study area. Sec. 1103. Designation of Kimberling Creek Potential Wilderness Area, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1104. Seng Mountain and Bear Creek Scenic Areas, Jefferson National Forest, Virginia. Sec. 1105. Trail plan and development. Sec. 1106. Maps and boundary descriptions. Sec. 1107. Effective date. Subtitle C—Mt. Hood Wilderness, Oregon Sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Recreation in Idaho: Campgrounds, Sites and Destinations
    U.S. Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Recreation in Idaho Campgrounds, Sites and Destinations Locations to Explore Four BLM district offices, 12 field offices and the Idaho State Office administer almost 12 million acres of public lands in Idaho. Please reference the colors and map throughout the booklet for specific regions of Idaho. You may also contact our offices with questions or more information. East-Central and Eastern Idaho Northern Idaho BLM IDAHO FALLS DISTRICT BLM COEUR D’ALENE DISTRICT 1405 Hollipark Drive | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 3815 Schreiber Way | Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815 208-524-7500 208-769-5000 BLM Challis Field Office BLM Coeur d’Alene Field Office 721 East Main Avenue, Suite 8 3815 Schreiber Way | Coeur d’Alene, ID 83815 Challis, ID 83226 208-769-5000 208-879-6200 BLM Cottonwood Field Office BLM Pocatello Field Office 2 Butte Drive | Cottonwood, ID 83522 4350 Cliffs Drive | Pocatello, ID 83204 208-962-3245 208-478-6340 Southwestern Idaho BLM Salmon Field Office BLM BOISE DISTRICT 1206 S. Challis St. | Salmon, ID 83467 3948 Development Avenue | Boise, ID 83705 208-756-5400 208-384-3300 BLM Upper Snake Field Office BLM Bruneau Field Office 1405 Hollipark Dr. | Idaho Falls, ID 83401 3948 Development Ave. | Boise, ID 83705 208-524-7500 208-384-3300 South-Central Idaho BLM Four Rivers Field Office and the BLM TWIN FALLS DISTRICT Morley Nelson Snake River Birds of Prey 2536 Kimberly Road | Twin Falls, ID 83301 National Conservation Area 208-735-2060 3948 Development Ave. | Boise, ID 83705 208-384-3300 BLM Burley Field Office 15 East 200 South | Burley, ID 83318 BLM Owyhee Field Office 208-677-6600 20 First Avenue West | Marsing, ID 83639 208-896-5912 BLM Jarbidge Field Office 2536 Kimberly Road | Twin Falls, ID 83301 208-735-2060 BLM Shoshone Field Office including the Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve 400 West “F” Street | Shoshone, ID 83352 208-732-7200 Whitewater fun for the family on one of many Idaho rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Owyhee County Comprehensive Plan
    OWYHEE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Adopted by Resolution 02-04 February 11, 2002 Amended by Resolution 10-21 August 9, 2010 1 I. INTRODUCTION Owyhee County History In the early nineteenth century, Owyhee County was inhabited by the Shoshone, Bannock, and Northern Paiute Indians. In 1818, members of the John MacKenzie expedition reached the Boise Valley accompanied by natives of the Sandwich Islands known as “Owyhee’s.” A few of these natives explored southwestern Idaho that winter and disappeared, and the name “Owyhee” originates from references to these early visitors. Miners ventured into Owyhee country in 1863 discovering “Orofino”--- gold and silver. The Cities of DeLamar, Ruby City, Wagon Town, and Silver City were population centers produced by this boom era that lasted until 1912. During that time, several million dollars in minerals were taken from the Owyhee Mountains. During the mining boom, range cattle from Texas and California were trailed to the area because of the high demand for meat to feed the miners. Ranching and livestock grazing became a permanent staple of the Owyhee County economy as ranchers settled in the area, laying claim to private lands and the waters which provided the source for stock water. The original county seat was established in Ruby City and later moved to Silver City. Because of the remote location and difficult winter travel to Silver City, the county seat was re-established in Murphy in 1934. By oversight, the Idaho legislature did not officially designate Murphy as the county seat until 1999, but in fact, the county courthouse existed there for 65 years prior to the designation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ogv50n02.Pdf
    OREGON GEOLOGY published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries VOLUME 50, NUMBER 2 FEBRUARY 1988 Map summarizes data on OREGON GEOLOGY (ISSN 0164-3304) geothermal-resource area at VOLUME 50, NUMBER 2 FEBRUARY 1988 Newberry Crater Published monthly by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (Volumes 1 through 40 were entitled The Ore Bin). A new map published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) provides information on geother­ Governing Board mal exploration in the Newberry Crater area. Allen P. Stinchfield, Chair ...................... North Bend Newberry Crater Geothermal Resource Area, Deschutes Coun­ Donald A. Haagensen, ............................ Portland ty, Oregon, by DOGAMI staff members Dennis L. Olmstead and Sidney R. Johnson ................................. Baker Dan E. Wermiel, has been released as DOGAMI Open-File Report State Geologist ........................... Donald A. Hull 0-88-3. The blackline ozalid print is approximately 36 by 52 inches Deputy State Geologist ................... John D. Beaulieu large and uses a topographic base at the scale of 1:24,000. It covers Publications Manager/Editor ............... Beverly F. Vogt the area in and around Newberry Crater, the locations of past and Associate Editor ..................... Klaus K.E. Neuendorf future geothermal drilling activity. Main Office: 910 State Office Building, 1400 SW Fifth Ave., Portland The map c9ntains detailed information, such as location, total 97201, phone (503) 229-5580. depth, date, name of operator, and status, for all geothermal wells Baker Field Office: 1831 First Street, Baker 97814, phone (503) drilled or proposed as of January 1988. It also outlines the areas 523-3133 Howard C. Brooks, Resident Geologist that are considered suitable or unsuitable for drilling and those that Grants Pass Field Office: 312 SE "H" Street, Grants Pass 97526, are closed or restricted with regard to geothermal exploration.
    [Show full text]