PHYSIOECONOMIC THEORIES OF CULTURE AND CONSUMPTION by P. PARKER and N. T. TAVASSOLI 97/70/MKT * Associate Professor of Marketing at INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau Cedex, France. ** Assistant Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 38 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142-1307. A working paper in the INSEAD Working Paper Series is intended as a means whereby a faculty researchers thoughts and findings may be communicated to interested readers. The paper should be considered preliminary in nature and may require revision. Printed at INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France. Physioeconomic Theories of Culture and Consumption Philip M. Parker INSEAD Nader T. Tavassoli MIT July 1997 Philip M. Parker is a Professor at INSEAD, Bd. de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau, France (tel: 33-1-60-72-4000; fax: 33-1-60-74-5500; email:
[email protected]). Nader T. Tavassoli is an Assistant Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 38 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02142-1307 (tel: 617-253-286i; tax: 617-258-7597; email:
[email protected]). 1 "No person who examines and reflects, can avoid seeing that there is but one race of people on the earth, who differ from each other only according from the soil and the climate in which they live." — J. G. Stedman (1790) INTRODUCTION The literature has long recognized that consumer behavior varies across cultures. Attributing these differences to causal mechanisms, however, has been elusive. The quandary of attribution faced in consumer research is not unlike continuing debates in anthropology and sociology. It has been argued that social phenomena are self-contained entities that can only be explained in terms of other social phenomena (Durkheim 1895), that "culture is a thing sui generis which can be only explained in terms of itself ..