Bilateral Relations Between the Us and Saudi Arabia: 1990-2003

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bilateral Relations Between the Us and Saudi Arabia: 1990-2003 BILATERAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE US AND SAUDI ARABIA: 1990-2003 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY EDA BENLOLU IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DECEMBER 2005 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences ________________ Prof. Dr. Sencer Ayata Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Benli Altunıık Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Science. ________________ Prof. Dr. Meliha Benli Altunıık Supervisor Examining Committee Members Prof. Dr. Meliha Benli Altunıık (METU, IR) ___________________ Prof. Dr.hsan D. Daı (METU, IR) ___________________ Assoc.Prof. Dr. Çarı Erhan (A. Ü., SBF) ___________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last Name: Eda Benliolu Signature : iii ABSTRACT BILATERAL RELATIONS BETWEEN THE US AND SAUDI ARABIA: 1990-2003 Benliolu, Eda M. Sc., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Meliha Benli Altunıık January 2006, 126 pages The objective of this thesis is to analyze the bilateral relations between the US and Saudi Arabia in the period between 1990 and 2003. In this context, the aim is to find out an answer to the question of how the relations between the US-Saudi Arabia have strained after September 11. Accordingly, the thesis contains four main parts. In the first part of the study, the historical background of US-Saudi relations up to the 1990-1991 Gulf Crisis, which was based on oil for security exchange, is studied. In the second part of the study, the security dilemma of Saudi Arabia, the challenges Saudi Arabia faced during the 1990s, and how these challenges affected its relations with the US are discussed. In the third part, September 11 and how global issues like war on terrorism, war in Iraq and democratization in the Middle East came into the agenda of the relationship is scrutinized. Accordingly, this thesis has reached to the iv following conclusions: First, after September 11, the relations between the two countries became more problematic and have affected by both global issues as well as domestic debates in both countries. Second, despite increasingly problematic nature of the relationship, the two countries managed to continue their strategic relationship, particularly as regards to “war on terrorism”. Keywords: Saudi Arabia, the US, Oil for security, Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, Socio- political change in Saudi Arabia, September 11, War on terrorism, the Iraqi war, Democracy in the Middle East. v ÖZ AMERKA BRLEK DEVLETLER VE SUUD ARABSTAN’IN KL LKLER: 1990-2003 Benliolu, Eda Yüksek Lisans, Uluslararası likiler Bölümü Tez Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Meliha Benli Altunıık Ocak 2006, 126 sayfa Bu tezin amacı, Amerika Birleik Devletleri ile Suudi Arabistan’ın ikili ilikilerini 1990 ile 2003 yillari arasindaki zaman diliminde incelemektir. Bu balamda, amaç Amerika Birleik Devletleri’nin Suudi Arabistan’la ilikilerinin 11 Eylül’den sonra nasıl gerginletii sorusuna cevap bulmaktır. Tez dört ana bölümden olumaktadır. lk bölümde, Amerika Birleik Devletleri ile Suudi Arabistan’ın 1990- 1991 Körfez Krizi’ne kadar ki süreçte petrol karılıında güvenlik üzerine kurulmu olan ilikilerinin tarihsel geçmii çalıılmıtır. kinci kısımda, Suudi Arabistan’ın güvenlik ikilemi, Suudi Arabistan’ın 1990’larda karılamı olduu problemler ve bu problemlerin Suudi Arabistan’ın Amerika Birleik Devletleri ile ilikilerini nasıl etkiledii tartıılacaktır. Üçüncü bölümde, 11 Eylül ve terörle sava, Irak Savaı ve Ortadou’da demokratikleme süreci gibi küresel konuların ikili ilikilerin vi gündeminde nasıl yer aldıı mercek altına alınacaktır. Böylece, bu tez çalımasında aaıdaki sonuçlara ulaılmıtır. lk olarak, 11 Eylül sonrası dönemde iki ülke arasındaki ilikiler daha sorunlu olmutur; ayrıca ikili ilikiler, küresel konulardan ve iç politika tartımalarından da etkilenmitir. kinci olarak, gittikçe artan sorunlara ramen, her iki ülke stratejik ilikilerini özellikle terörle sava konusunda devam ettirmeyi baarmıtır. Anahtar Kelimeler: Suudi Arabistan, Amerika Birleik Devletleri, güvenlik için petrol, Irak’ın Kuveyt’i igali, Suudi Arabistan’daki sosyo-politik deiiklik, 11 Eylül, Terörle sava, Irak Savaı, Ortadou’da demokrasi. vii To my dear mother Seyhan and father Ali eref and of course, to my brothers Emre and Emrah. viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank those who helped me in this study. First, I would like to sincerely thank my thesis advisor, Prof. Dr. Meliha Benli Altunıık for her invaluable support, encouragement, guidance, advice, criticism and insight throughout this study. Without her patient, support and belief in me, I would not have completed this thesis. Also I would like to mention my appreciation to my thesis comittee, Prof. Dr. hsan D. Daı and Associate Prof. Dr. Çarı Erhan for their advice, patience and useful comments. I have five angels in my life that watched me, guided me and took care of me. I have no proper words to express my indebtedness to my mother Seyhan Benliolu, my father Ali eref Benliolu, and my brothers Emre Benliolu and Emrah Benliolu who supported me in every step of life, believed in me and respected all my choices and decisions. I also owe great thank to Ferdane Güler, my last angel and grandmother, for her prayers. Thank you for your endless love, support and tolerance for my stressful presence for many months. I cannot thank you enough except telling that your love meant too much for me in producing something that I can be proud of. My special thanks go to all my colleagues at the Department of International Relations, who always stand by me with their friendships and encouragement. While preparing this thesis, I have a chance to work with wonderful people who saved my life solving my problems in a few minutes. Throughout the ix year, Derya Kap, ebnem Badere Orman, Duran imek, Pınar Arıkan and Bayram Sinkaya have always listened to my constant thesis stress, prepared a suitable atmosphere to deal with the difficulties. Their endless morale support, patience and profound assistance kept me in control. I am also grateful to my roommates Gülen Aydın eker, Özgür Taylan Kaya, Ali Yıldız for their support and motivation. Their contribution to this thesis has been quite decisive. I also would like to thank Aslıgül Sarıkamı, Berna Özen Süer, Aslı Feride Ergül, Ömür Bostan Atmaca, Özlem Kaplan, Beishen Toktogulov and all my other colleagues. Special thanks go to Cengiz Sürücü, Çarı Öztürk and Can Aydın for helping me with the editing, proofreading and for their advice. I really appreciate Assistant Professor Özlem Tür and Assistant Professor Oktay Tanrısever for their support and help. Moreover, I express my sincere appreciation to eniz Bilgi Arı, dris Demir, Kemal Ünal, Emine Erdoan, Iıl Eyiol, Sibel ve Esin Daralı, Mesut Tatekin, aban Karda ve Mehmet ahin for their patience, support, inestimable comments and assistance. I also express my sincere appreciation to Prof. Dr. Münir Atalar for his invaluable support for me in choosing the academic life’s path. I also would like to thank Gülin Yardibi, Mübin Karahan Yerlikaya, Sema Büyük, Durak Mutluer, Alaattin Yıldız, Sedat Meriçelli, Yahya Zehir, Harun Cengiz and Aysel Karakul for their support and help. x TABLE OF CONTENTS PLAGIARISM....................................................................................................iii ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... iv ÖZ ...................................................................................................................... vi DEDICATION .................................................................................................viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................ ix TABLE OF CONTENTS.................................................................................... xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ...........................................................................xiii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................... 1 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND.............................................................. 7 2.1. Foundation of the Kingdom ......................................................... 7 2.2. The Discovery of Oil and the Foundation of Saudi- American Relations .......................................................................... 11 2.3. The Historic Meeting and the Post World War II Period ............ 15 2.4. The 1973 Oil Crisis and The Arab Oil Embargo......................... 23 2.5. Twin Pillars Policy ................................................................... 24 2.6. Iranian Revolution of 1979 and Its Aftermath ........................... 26 3. US-SAUDI RELATIONS DURING THE 1990s.................................... 29 3.1. The Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait and The Saudi Response ............. 31 3.2. The US Role in the Security of Saudi Arabia ...........................
Recommended publications
  • The “Arab Spring” in the Kingdoms
    RESEARCH PAPER The “Arab Spring” in the Kingdoms Zoltan Barany | September 2012 The “Arab Spring” in the Kingdoms Series: Research Paper Zoltan Barany | September 2012 Copyright © 2012 Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies. All Rights Reserved. ____________________________ The Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies is an independent research institute and think tank for the study of history and social sciences, with particular emphasis on the applied social sciences. The Center‟s paramount concern is the advancement of Arab societies and states, their cooperation with one another and issues concerning the Arab nation in general. To that end, it seeks to examine and diagnose the situation in the Arab world – states and communities – to analyze social, economic, and cultural policies and to provide political analysis from an Arab perspective. The Center publishes in both Arabic and English in order to make its work accessible to both Arab and non-Arab researchers. Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies PO Box 10277 Street No. 826, Zone 66 Doha, Qatar Tel.: +974 44199777 | Fax: +974 44831651 www.dohainstitute.org Table of Contents Introduction 1 Varieties of Upheaval 3 Explaining the Different Levels of Upheaval 9 Societal Cleavages 18 Deficiencies of Political Mobilization 20 State Responses 23 Buying Social Peace 23 Political Responses: Carrots and Sticks 25 External Assistance 31 Conclusion 36 THE ARAB SPRING IN THE KINGDOMS Introduction1 The revolutions that have rocked the presidential republics of North Africa and the Middle East since early-2011 have garnered intense scholarly and journalistic interest and, in a short time, spawned an extensive literature.2 The Arab world‟s eight monarchies – Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) – with the notable exception of the first, a tiny island kingdom off the coast of Saudi Arabia, have escaped the brunt of the upheaval and received relatively modest attention.
    [Show full text]
  • CPC Outreach Journal #207
    #207 15 Oct 2002 USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Air University Air War College Maxwell AFB, Alabama Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information. This information includes articles, papers and other documents addressing issues pertinent to US military response options for dealing with nuclear, biological and chemical threats and attacks. It’s our hope this information resource will help enhance your counterproliferation issue awareness. Established here at the Air War College in 1998, the USAF/CPC provides education and research to present and future leaders of the Air Force, as well as to members of other branches of the armed services and Department of Defense. Our purpose is to help those agencies better prepare to counter the threat from weapons of mass destruction. Please feel free to visit our web site at www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc-cps.htm for in-depth information and specific points of contact. Please direct any questions or comments on CPC Outreach Journal Jo Ann Eddy, CPC Outreach Editor, at (334) 953-7538 or DSN 493-7538. To subscribe, change e-mail address, or unsubscribe to this journal or to request inclusion on the mailing list for CPC publications, please contact Mrs. Eddy. The following articles, papers or documents do not necessarily reflect official endorsement of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or other US government agencies. Reproduction for private use or commercial gain is subject to original copyright restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Censored 2017
    CENSORED 2017 Fortieth Anniversary Edition Mickey Huff and Andy Lee Roth with Project Censored Foreword by Mark Crispin Miller Cartoons by Khalil Bendib Seven Stories Press New York • Oakland Copyright © 2016 by Mickey Huff and Andy Lee Roth Foreword © 2016 by Mark Crispin Miller A Seven Stories Press First Edition All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, by any means, including mechanical, electronic, photocopying, recording or other- wise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Seven Stories Press 140 Watts Street New York, NY 10013 www.sevenstories.com ISBN 978-1-60980-715-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-60980-716-0 (electronic) ISSN 1074-5998 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Book design by Jon Gilbert Printed in the USA CHAPTER 6 Played by the Mighty Wurlitzer The Press, the CIA, and the Subversion of Truth Brian Covert A journalist in the US specializing in national security issues, Ken Dilanian, found himself under the harsh glare of the media spotlight in September 2014, when it was revealed that he had been collabo- rating with press officers of the United States government’s Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) in the shaping and publishing of his news stories for the Los Angeles Times, one of the most influential daily newspapers in the nation. An exposé by the Intercept online magazine showed how, in pri- vate e-mail messages to CIA public affairs staff, Dilanian had not only shared entire drafts of his stories with the agency prior to publication, but had also offered to write up for the CIA on at least one occasion a story on controversial US drone strikes overseas that would be “reas- suring to the public” and “a good opportunity” for the CIA to put its spin on the issue.1 And Dilanian was not alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Penalty for Kuwaiti Duo Who Killed Roommate
    SUBSCRIPTION WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2014 MUHARRAM 12, 1436 AH www.kuwaittimes.net UN launches A lifetime of Syria’s Double tragedy campaign perks in UAE better-offs as Protectionist to end help cushion seek fun as races to win statelessness7 wealth13 gap war14 grinds on Melbourne20 Cup Death penalty for Kuwaiti Max 33º Min 17º duo who killed roommate High Tide 10:48 & 22:39 Low Tide Victim, suspects were students at University of Sharjah 04:29 & 16:44 40 PAGES NO: 16333 150 FILS By A Saleh and Agencies The Real Fouz makes SHARJAH: Two Kuwaiti students, including a member Kuwait Times debut of the royal family, were sentenced to death yesterday by the Sharjah Sharia Court for the torture and murder Kuwait Times is pleased of their roommate. Kuwaiti Mubarak Meshaal Al- to announce a collabora- Mubarak, 19, a first-year student at the University of tion with one of Kuwait’s Sharjah, died at the University City Hospital in Sharjah most beautiful and well- on Feb 24 last year after suffering internal bleeding, known local personali- burns and multiple fractures sustained following several ties, The Real Fouz. days of physical abuse. The victim’s family had asked the Known for her amazing judge to give the duo the death sentence. beauty tips, lifestyle The verdict was issued by Judge Hussain Al-Assofi. advice and much more, The suspects, ruling-family member Y S, 20, and H A, 19, The Real Fouz will be were found guilty of depriving the victim’s freedom, tor- offering Kuwait Times’ readers a weekly column on ture and premeditated murder.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of the Arabian Peninsula
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ARABIAN PENINSULA J.E. Peterson Prefatory Note: This bibliography concentrates on citations relating to the Arabian Peninsula that I have collected over some three decades. Items have been published in various Western languages as well as Arabic. This is very much a work in progress and cannot be considered complete. Similarly, presentation of the bibliography here in the present format should be regarded as an interim effort despite its imperfections. A number of older citations have yet to be transferred from notecards to the database on which this bibliography is based. Some items are unpublished, other citations are not complete (typically lacking volume details and page numbers for periodical citations). Shorter articles and those of a more transitory nature, i.e. newspaper and newsletter articles, have been excluded. I have not been able to examine all the items and therefore undoubtedly there are many mistakes in citations and inevitably some items have been included that do not actually exist. The bibliography is in simple and rough alphabetical order according to author only because I have had no opportunity to rearrange by subject. Alphabetization was done automatically within the original database and idiosyncrasies in the database regarding non-English diacritical marks may make alphabetization somewhat irregular. For similar reasons, the order in which entries by the same author are listed may also be irregular. The subjects reflect my own interests and therefore range from history through the social sciences and international affairs. Generally speaking, archaeology, the arts, the physical sciences, and many areas of culture, inter alia, have not been included.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Oil And
    SYMPO S IUM : GULF OIL AND GA S : WHAT ARE THE PRODUCER S THINKIN G ? GULF OIL AND GAS : WHAT ARE THE PR O DUCERS THINKIN G ? Nathaniel Kern, Fareed Mohamedi, Lucian Pugliaresi, Jean-François Seznec The following is an edited transcript of the sixtieth in a series of Capitol Hill conferences convened by the Middle East Policy Council. The meeting was held Thursday, April 22, 2010, with Thomas R. Mattair presiding. THOMAS MATTAIR: Executive director, Middle East Policy Council, and associate editor, Middle East Policy; author, Global Security Watch—Iran: A Reference Handbook Today we’re examining what the oil and gas producers are thinking when they make their calculations and which economic and political factors influence their decisions. The domestic economic factors would be their need for revenue, their desire to diversify their economies, their need to satisfy domestic constituencies — and, in the case of Iraq, the domestic political instability that could challenge oil development. In the international realm, what are the geopolitical forces that the producers have to take into account? Where is demand falling, and where is it rising? Who do their most important customers have to be in a strictly economic sense, and who are their most important political and strategic partners? We have some divergence taking place there now, as the customers are in the East and the security partners are in the West. NATHANIEL KERN: President, Foreign Reports Obviously, none of us here can speak for the governments in the region. But I will de- scribe some of the changes that have occurred in the historic relationship that the United States has had with a key producer — Saudi Arabia — and then look to the future and the mutually beneficial mixture of “hard” and “soft” power each of the two countries brings to the relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/10.1162/ISEC a 00048 by Guest on 28 September 2021 International Security 36:1 168
    A Crude Threat A Crude Threat Joshua R. Itzkowitz Shifrinson and The Limits of an Iranian Missile Miranda Priebe Campaign against Saudi Arabian Oil Developments in Iran’s ballistic missile program have made headlines over the last several years.1 In the United States, Senator Carl Levin calls Iran’s short- and medium- range missile arsenal “the number one threat in the Middle East,” and Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Michèle Flournoy argues, “The threat from Iran’s short- and medium-range ballistic missiles is developing more rap- idly than previously projected.”2 Israeli ofªcials similarly describe the Iranian missile program as “a matter of grave concern.”3 States around the Persian Gulf, meanwhile, worry that Iran’s missiles are meant to intimidate and ex- tract political concessions from them, with Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah not- ing that the Iranians “launch missiles in the hope of putting fear in the people and the world.”4 These worries are not simply abstract concerns. At a time when the United States and its allies remain locked in a standoff with Iran over the latter’s nu- clear program, states around the Persian Gulf fear that Iran would retaliate for an attack on its nuclear program by striking regional oil installations and other strategic targets.5 Iranian ofªcials have threatened to use ballistic missiles in Joshua R. Itzkowitz Shifrinson and Miranda Priebe are doctoral candidates in the Political Science Depart- ment at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The authors thank Nathan Black, Eugene Gholz, Brendan Rittenhouse Green, Llewelyn Hughes, Barry Posen, Andrew Radin, and the anonymous reviewers for their comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Saudi Arabia's Upstream and Downstream Expansion Plans For
    Center for Strategic and International Studies Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy 1800 K Street, N.W. • Suite 400 • Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 1 (202) 775 -3270 • Fax: 1 (202) 457 -8746 Saudi Arabia's Upstream and Downstream Expansion Plan s for the Next Decade: A Saudi Perspective Nawaf Obaid Nathaniel Kern Adjunct Fellow, CSIS FOREIGN REPORTS INC. Revised: October 3 , 2005 Saudi Arabia's Upstream and Downstream Expa nsion Plans for the Next Decade Page 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 3 INTEGRATING UPSTREAM AND DOWNSTREAM EXPANSION PLANS ................................ ............................. 4 UPSTREAM ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 5 OIL FIELD DEPLETION RATES & C APACITY ................................ ................................ ............................... 5 PROJECTED NEW PRODUCTION CAPACITY ................................ ................................ ................................ .6 CURRENT SAUDI PRODUCTION GRADE ................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 6 MEGA -PROJECTS ................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 6 Abu Safah and Qatif ................................ ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Succession in Saudi Arabia
    A Game of Thrones: Royal Succession in Saudi Arabia Yoel Guzansky The Formation of the Principles of Succession To a large extent, maintaining regime stability in Saudi Arabia relates to the transition of power among brothers rather than from father to son. It may be that this custom has ensured successors with the requisite experience to manage affairs of state, but it has also reduced the pool of potential heirs, resulting in the possibility that Saudi Arabia’s aging leadership may negatively affect the nation’s stability. Concern about succession struggles is not groundless, as the kingdom’s selection process is not entirely institutionalized. Problems concerning succession of governance in monarchies are not unique to Saudi Arabia – Oman too could face them – but the status and importance of Saudi Arabia as the “custodian” of Islam’s holy sites, its possession of the world’s largest oil reserves, and its role as the leading political and military power among the Gulf’s Arab states lends urgency to the Saudi situation. The advanced age and deteriorating health of King Salman and the nomination of Muhammad bin Nayef as the kingdom’s new deputy crown prince suggest that a transition of power to the grandsons’ generation, or at least a decision on the identity of the next heir, is closer than previously thought. The formation of the process of succession in Saudi Arabia began during the reign of the country’s first king and the founder of the modern Saudi state, Abdulaziz, also known as Ibn Saud. When the modern Saudi state was founded in 1932, the political structure relied primarily on the personal loyalty of the leaders of the dominant tribes to the king.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis the Impact of (KRG) on the Relations Between Turkey and Iraq
    Available Online at www.ijcrr.in International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review ISSN 0976 – 4852 Thesis CrossRef DOI: https://doi.org/10.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/05/512 May, 2018|Volume 09|Issue 05| Section: Social Science The Impact of (KRG) on the Relations between Turkey and Iraq Since 2010 Halgr N. Tairo1, Prof. Dr. Celal Nazım İREM* 1Department of the Institute of Social Sciences The Political Sciences and International Relations *Thesis Advisor Accepted 2018-05-13 Abstract: The impact of KRG (Kurdish Regional Government) of Iraq on the relationships between Turkey and Iraq has been analyzed in this study. This study has examined the political relationship between Turkey, Iraq and KRG and the impact of economic relations on the political relations between Turkey, Iraq and KRG as well. The researcher has implemented the most applicable literature for collecting all the data which are belong to this research. This study used quantitative and qualitative methods in order to gather and examine information. Furthermore, this project has applied Neoliberal theory for analyzing data. A representative from Iraqi Kurdish representative in Erbil has been interviewed by the researcher in order to get benefit from his experience and knowledge concerning Turkish and Iraqi Kurdish relations. After finishing this project and analyzing the existing data with results the investigator determined that there is a strong bound between established literature and results. This study concludes that there is a strong relationship between Turkey and KRG in last decade. In contrast, the relationships of Turkey and Iraq have gotten worse due to KRG and Turkey relations since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • How Iranians Might React to a Nuclear Deal
    HOW IRANIANS MIGHT REACT TO A NUCLEAR DEAL Patrick Clawson Mehdi Khalaji PATRICK CLAWSON MEHDI KHALAJI HOW IRANIANS MIGHT REACT TO A NUCLEAR DEAL POLICY FOCUS 136 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY www.washingtoninstitute.org The opinions expressed in this Policy Focus are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Washington Institute, its Board of Trustees, or its Board of Advisors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. © 2014 by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy The Washington Institute for Near East Policy 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1050 Washington, DC 20036 Cover design: 1000colors Contents 1. Introduction | 1 2. Economic Benefits from a Deal: Reality and Expectations | 4 3. Khamenei and Nuclear Negotiations | 42 4. Conclusion: Implications for U.S. Policy | 52 The Authors | 56 Figures 1. IRAN: Foreign Trade in $US Billions | 27 iii 1 Introduction AT SOME POINT—WHETHER by the November 24, 2014, target or later— Iran and the P5+1 countries (Britain, China, France, Germany, Rus- sia, and the United States) may reach what the Joint Plan of Action calls “the final step of a comprehensive solution” to the nuclear impasse. How such a nuclear deal will be perceived inside Iran is important for at least two reasons. The first is the “theory of the case,” to use a term popular in the Obama White House: namely, that a nuclear deal will show the benefits of Rouhani’s approach to working with the West.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Diplomacy: American Policy in the Persian Gulf
    Oil Diplomacy: American Policy in the Persian Gulf GAWDAT BAHGAT ABSTRACT In the 1970s, energy security was defined as reducing dependence on imported oil. In today's market environment, however, it is seen as a shared inter- est between producers and consumers. This study examines Washington's efforts to pursue a long-term oil strategy. These include the widening gap between pro- duction and consumption in the United States, volatility of oil prices, the poten- tial opening of the upstream oil sector in Saudi Arabia, the Iranian role in developing energy resources from the Caspian Basin and economic sanctions on Iraq. The main argument is that the prosperity of both the American and the global economy depends on the availability of Gulf oil in reliable volume and at reasonable prices. OIL DIPLOMACY: AMERICAN POLICY IN THE PERSIAN GULF For more than half a century, oil has been the world's dominant energy source. In the next few decades, however, oil's share of the global energy demand is projected to decline slightly from approximately 40 percent to 38 percent.' Despite this decline, oil will remain the single largest energy source. Thus, world- wide demand for oil is expected to increase from 75 million barrels per day (b/d) to 112.4 million b/d in 2020.2 Within this projection, two important facts need to be underscored. First, more than half the growth in oil consumption in indus- trialized countries will occur in the United States. Second, despite real and poten- tial increases in oil production from the North Sea, West Africa and the Caspian GAWDAT BAHGAT, PH.D., IS THE DIRECTOR OF CENTER FOR MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES AT INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA.
    [Show full text]