DOCSLIB.ORG

Darq Side Productions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Darq Side Productions G L O B A L H E A L T H Global Health Strategies for Security "The idea of human security, though simple, is likely to revolutionize society in the 21st century" UNDP’s 1994 Human Development Report W E L C O M E ! Dear Students, Welcome to the Global Health Strategies for Security (GHSS) Course. This two-week course is designed to enhance programs and efforts in order to conduct global health activities and provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and action. This course will review and assess policy and explore various entities' roles in global health and Department of Defense Global Health Engagement in particular. This course was developed and facilitated by the Uniformed Services University's Center for Global Health Engagement (CGHE). As part of CGHE's mission, GHSS falls within the center's goal to integrate, synchronize, educate, train and support the Department of Defense (DoD) Global Health Engagement (GHE) enterprise to meet objectives of the Joint Force, Combatant Commands (CCMDs), Services, the Military Health System (MHS) and national security. Within this workbook you will find an overview of the course, bios for each of the speakers, an agenda, a list of acronyms, and questions to guide the group discussion. is intended to facilitate the learning process. As with all components of this course, feedback and recommendations are welcome to benefit future efforts. Enjoy the course, GHSS Course Staff/Instructors Center for Global Health Engagement Uniformed Services University 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Website: https://www.usuhs.edu/cghe Email: [email protected] ABOUT GHSS Purpose: To enable success for global health programs planned and conducted by U.S. Government Agencies. This course is designed to develop an understanding of the civil and military considerations at the nexus of global health and security, and enhance competency to develop whole-of-government strategies and programs to strengthen health systems and counter transnational health threats. Participants will build and strengthen their understanding of the global health arena and their capacity to use strategic guidance to develop effective global health strategies and programs. Instruction and exercises will provide the understanding and skill set needed to plan and execute programs that support the National Security Strategy, US Global Health Security Agenda, Combatant Command Theater Cooperation Plans, and country-specific campaign plans. Participants will learn to collect and analyze health information to identify and plan appropriate health engagement strategies to meet the needs of the partner country and fit within USG priorities and guidance From a DoD perspective, this course is designed to provide the CCMD GHE Program Manager with the understanding and tools necessary to plan and execute a Command’s GHE Program. This task/mission being to develop and manage a program where the CCMD is providing the strategic/long term level oversight and guidance to shape the use of health as a military engagement tool. This includes the development of processes and products to guide the shaping and execution of the tactical level health engagement activities conducted under the authority of the CCMD and the Service Components. This will be accomplished through a process of building a contextual understanding of the global health space (week 1) and then applying this understanding to enable the conduct of health engagement activities (week 2). The GHSS course was first conducted in August of 2012 at the Johns Hopkins University Rockville campus. This first iteration was a 4-week in residence effort developed and conducted in collaboration with Dr. Gil Burnham of Johns Hopkins University. Subsequent iterations of the course were reduced to two weeks and conducted annually since 2014. Each of these iterations was conducted in partnership with the Division of International Health Security under the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services. The course has been conducted via a combination of lecture, group discussion, and small group activities designed to help participants apply the lessons discussed in the course to produce a country-specific global health engagement plan. ACRONYMS DoD-related Non-DoD global health stakeholders AOR: Area of responsibility (in reference to CCMD CDC: US Centers for Disease Control and AORs) Prevention APRRP: African Peacekeeping Rapid Response CSO: Civil society organization Partnership DHHS: US Department of Health and Human CBEP: Cooperative Biological Engagement Program Services CCMD: Combatant Command; DoS: US Department of State Geographic CCMDs include: US Northern Command FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization (of the (NORTHCOM), US Southern Command UN) (SOUTHCOM), US European Command (EUCOM), HN: Host nation US Africa Command (AFRICOM), US Pacific MOH: Ministry of Health Command (PACOM) and US Central Command NGO: Non-governmental organization (CENTCOM) OFDA: (USAID’s) Office for Foreign Disaster CGHE: Center for Global Health Engagement (your Assistance course facilitators) OIE: World Organization for Animal Health COIN: Counterinsurgency PN: Partner nation DHAPP: Defense HIV/AIDS Prevention Program RC/RC: International Red Cross/Red Crescent DIMO: Defense Institute for Medical Operations Movement DSCA: Defense Security Cooperation Agency UN: United Nations DTRA: Defense Threat Reduction Agency UNOCHA: UN Office for the Coordination of FHA: Foreign Humanitarian Assistance Humanitarian Affairs FHP: Force health protection USAID: United States Agency for International FMF: Foreign military financing Development FMS: Foreign military sales USDA: US Department of Agriculture GEF: Guidance for Employment of the Force WHO: World Health Organization GVE: Global veterinary engagement Non-specific HCA: Humanitarian and civil assistance AME: Assessment, monitoring, and evaluation IMET: International military education and training GHSA: Global Health Security Agenda JTF: Joint task force GHSI: Global Health Security Initiative MHS: Military Health System HA: Humanitarian assistance NMS: National Military Strategy HA/DR: humanitarian assistance and disaster relief ODACHA: Overseas humanitarian, disaster and civic ID: Infectious disease aid IDP: Internally displaced person OHASIS: Overseas Humanitarian Assistance Shared M&E: Monitoring and evaluation Information System MOE: Measure of effectiveness SCO: Security Cooperation Office (housed in US MOP: Measure of performance embassies) NCD: Non-communicable disease TCCC: Tactical combat casualty care NSS: National Security Strategy TCP: Theater campaign plan PEPFAR: President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief TSCMIS: Theater Security Cooperation SDGs: Sustainable Development Goals (previously Management Information System Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)) USUHS: Uniformed Services University of the Health TAD: Transboundary animal disease Sciences WASH: Water, sanitation and hygiene Concepts, Strategy, and Cooperation Introduction to Global Health Day 1: Monday, 01 April 0900-0950: Senior Leader Perspective Mr. Thomas McCaffery Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Mr. Tom McCaffery was sworn in as the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs on August 23, 2017. In this role, Mr. McCaffery is the principal medical advisor to the Secretary of Defense. He administers the Military Health System (MHS) $50 billion Defense Health Program (DHP) budget and is responsible for ensuring the global delivery of quality, cost effective health care to 9.4 million Service Members, retirees, and their families. Mr. McCaffery oversees the Defense Health Agency and the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences. Mr. McCaffery has extensive experience in the health care industry. Most recently, he served as Vice President, California State Partnerships at Blue Shield of California. Prior to his tenure at Blue Shield, he served as Chief Deputy Director of the California Department of Health Services, California’s public health and health care services agency. Mr. McCaffery also served as Senior Vice President / Chief Operating Officer at the Alliance of Catholic Health Care, the public policy and advocacy organization representing California’s Catholic health systems and hospitals. 1000-1050: Introduction/Current Issues Mr. Joshua Michaud Associate Director of Global Health Policy Team, Kaiser Family Foundation Josh Michaud is an Associate Director with the Global Health Policy team at the Kaiser Family Foundation, where he directs a variety of research projects. Dr. Michaud is an authority on the role of the Department of Defense in global health, innovative financing, and global health diplomacy, among other topics. He has published numerous articles and book chapters and teaches graduate-level courses as a Professorial Lecturer with the International Development department at the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), in Washington D.C. 1100-1200: Course Overview and Participant Introductions CAPT Carolyn Currie Director of Training, Professional Development Center for Global Health Engagement Dr. Burnham founded the Center for Refugee and Disaster Response at Johns Hopkins in 1998, which was renamed to the Center for Humanitarian Health on September 1, 2017. He has extensive experience in emergency preparedness and response, particularly in humanitarian needs assessment, program planning, and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional Historic Information the Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish
    USS Hornet Sea, Air & Space Museum Additional Historic Information The Doolittle Raid (Hornet CV-8) Compiled and Written by Museum Historian Bob Fish AMERICA STRIKES BACK The Doolittle Raid of April 18, 1942 was the first U.S. air raid to strike the Japanese home islands during WWII. The mission is notable in that it was the only operation in which U.S. Army Air Forces bombers were launched from an aircraft carrier into combat. The raid demonstrated how vulnerable the Japanese home islands were to air attack just four months after their surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. While the damage inflicted was slight, the raid significantly boosted American morale while setting in motion a chain of Japanese military events that were disastrous for their long-term war effort. Planning & Preparation Immediately after the Pearl Harbor attack, President Roosevelt tasked senior U.S. military commanders with finding a suitable response to assuage the public outrage. Unfortunately, it turned out to be a difficult assignment. The Army Air Forces had no bases in Asia close enough to allow their bombers to attack Japan. At the same time, the Navy had no airplanes with the range and munitions capacity to do meaningful damage without risking the few ships left in the Pacific Fleet. In early January of 1942, Captain Francis Low1, a submariner on CNO Admiral Ernest King’s staff, visited Norfolk, VA to review the Navy’s newest aircraft carrier, USS Hornet CV-8. During this visit, he realized that Army medium-range bombers might be successfully launched from an aircraft carrier.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Incident of 3 July 1988 Affaire De L'incident Aerien
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS CASE CONCERNING THE AERIAL INCIDENT OF 3 JULY 1988 (ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN v.. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) VOLUME II COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE MEMOIRES, PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS AFFAIRE DE L'INCIDENT AERIEN DU 3 JUILLET 1988 (RÉPUBLIQUE ISLAMIQUE D'IRAN c. ÉTATS-UNIS D'AMERIQUE) VOLUME II The case conceming the Aerial Incident of 3 July 1988 (Islamic Republic of Iran V. United States of America), entered on the Court's General List on 17 May 1989 under Number 79, was removed from the List by an Order of the Court of 22 February 1996, following discontinuance by agreement of the Par- ties (Aerial Incident of 3 July 1988 (Islamic Republic of Iran V. United States of America), 1. Cl Reports 1996, p. 9). The pleadings in the case are being published in the following order: Volume 1. Application instituting proceedings of the Islamic Republic of Iran; Memorial of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Volume II. Preliminary objections of the United States of America; Observa- tions and submissions of the Islamic Republic of Iran on the preliminary objections; Observations of the International Civil Aviation Organization; selection of correspondence; SettIement Agreement. Regarding the reproduction of case files, the Court has decided that hence- forth, irrespective of the stage at which a case has terminated, publication should be confined to the wntten proceedings and oral arguments in the case, together with those documents, annexes and correspondence considered essential to illus- trate its decision. The Court has also specifically requested that, whenever tech- nical1y feasible, the volumes should consist of facsimile versions of the docu- ments submitted to it, in the form in which they were produced by the parties.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Navy in the World (1981-1990)
    The U.S. Navy in the World (1981-1990): Context for U.S. Navy Capstone Strategies and Concepts Peter M. Swartz with Karin Duggan MISC D0026419.A1/Final December 2011 CNA is a not-for-profit organization whose professional staff of over 700 provides in-depth analysis and results-oriented solutions to help government leaders choose the best courses of action. Founded in 1942, CNA operates the Institute for Public Research and the Center for Naval Analyses, the federally funded research and development center (FFRDC) of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps. CNA Strategic Studies (CSS), created in 2000, conducts high-quality research on and analysis of issues of strategic, regional, and policy importance. CSS’ analyses are based on objective, rigorous examination and do not simply echo conventional wisdom. CSS provides analytic support to U.S. Government organizations and the governments of partner countries. CSS also maintains notable foundation- sponsored and self-initiated research programs. CSS includes a Strategic Initiatives Group, an International Affairs Group, and a Center for Stability and Development. The Strategic Initiatives Group (SIG) looks at issues of U.S. national security, and military strategy, policy and operations, with a particular focus on maritime and naval aspects. SIG employs experts in historical analyses, futures planning, and long-term trend analysis based on scenario planning, to help key decision makers plan for the future. SIG specialties also include issues related to regional and global proliferation, deterrence theory, threat mitigation, and strategic planning for combating threats from weapons of mass destruction. The Strategic Studies Division is led by Vice President and Director Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voice of Commerce
    The Voice of Commerce Rhoda E. A. Hackler On September 19, 1820, John Coffin Jones Jr. was appointed United States Agent for Commerce and Seamen at the Sandwich Islands. Why did he accept the post? Possibly because he was already agent for the prosperous firm of Marshall and Wildes of Boston at the Sandwich Islands, and by accepting the additional responsibility from his country, the firm and he, himself, might hope that through his reports to Washington the voice of commerce in the Pacific would be heard more clearly by the United States Government. John Coffin Jones Jr. was a son of New England. His father was a prominent Boston businessman and politician, who had served as speaker of the Massa- chusetts House of Representatives in 1802 when John Quincy Adams was a member of the State Senate.1 Young Jones was baptised on June 26, 1796, by the minister of the Brattle Street Church in Boston,2 and seems to have gone to sea at an early age. When he acknowledged his commission as Agent for Commerce and Seamen to the then Secretary of State, his father's former legislative colleague, John Quincy Adams, he mentioned two previous voyages he had made to Canton and an extended visit to the Sandwich Islands,3 and J. J. Jarves in his History of the Hawaiian or Sandwich Islands, includes an illustration of a small oil painting of Kamehameha I which was presented to the Boston Athenaeum by John C. Jones, Jr. in 1818.4 In April of 1821, Jones reached Honolulu5 and settled down as U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rofworld •WKR II
    '^"'^^«^.;^c_x rOFWORLD •WKR II itliiro>iiiiii|r«trMit^i^'it-ri>i«fiinit(i*<j|yM«.<'i|*.*>' mk a ^. N. WESTWOOD nCHTING C1TTDC or WORLD World War II was the last of the great naval wars, the culmination of a century of warship development in which steam, steel and finally aviation had been adapted for naval use. The battles, both big and small, of this war are well known, and the names of some of the ships which fought them are still familiar, names like Bismarck, Warspite and Enterprise. This book presents these celebrated fighting ships, detailing both their war- time careers and their design features. In addition it describes the evolution between the wars of the various ship types : how their designers sought to make compromises to satisfy the require - ments of fighting qualities, sea -going capability, expense, and those of the different naval treaties. Thanks to the research of devoted ship enthusiasts, to the opening of government archives, and the publication of certain memoirs, it is now possible to evaluate World War II warships more perceptively and more accurately than in the first postwar decades. The reader will find, for example, how ships in wartime con- ditions did or did not justify the expecta- tions of their designers, admiralties and taxpayers (though their crews usually had a shrewd idea right from the start of the good and bad qualities of their ships). With its tables and chronology, this book also serves as both a summary of the war at sea and a record of almost all the major vessels involved in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty Battalion Navy JROTC
    Liberty Battalion Navy JROTC Leading from the Front…Always by Example! Agenda • Are you Ready? • Liberty Battalion Instructor Introductions • History of the JROTC Program and Navy JROTC • About Navy JROTC Program • Regional Changes for Navy JROTC and NDCC Units (Impact to Area 10) • Navy JROTC Benefits • The Big Three, and Plus One • Leadership Camps • Liberty Battalion Booster Club • Q & A Session Are You Ready? Liberty Battalion Instructors Chief James Bowman, US Navy (Ret.) Major David Arjona, US Marine Corps (Ret.) Chief Charles Gooseby, US Navy (Ret.) Naval Science Instructor Senior Naval Science Instructor Naval Science Instructor Senior Naval Science Instructor, Major David Arjona, USMC (Ret.) Marine Enlisted (Private – Staff Sergeant) | Nov 1990 – Dec 2001 • Student, Naval ROTC (0629) • Battalion Radio Chief (2537) • Marine Security Guard Duty (8151) • Field Radio Operator (2531) • Boot Camp, Marine Combat Training, and Communications School Units • Naval ROTC Houston Consortium, Rice & University of Houston (BS in Computer Engineering Tech.) • 2nd Battalion 10th Marines, Camp Lejeune, NC (29 Palms, CA, Ft. Bragg, NC) • American Embassy, Guatemala City, Guatemala (Mexico, El Salvador, Costa Rica) • American Embassy Sana’a, Yemen (Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan, Syria, Egypt) • 8th Marines Regiment, Camp Lejeune, NC (Turkey, Germany, Puerto Rico) • 3rd Medical Battalion, Okinawa, Japan (Philippines, South Korea) Senior Naval Science Instructor, Major David Arjona, USMC (Ret.) Marine Officer (Second Lieutenant – Major) | Dec 2001
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Weapons Against Civil Aircraft: Case Study of IR655 in the Ught of International Law
    Use of Weapons Against Civil Aircraft: Case Study of IR655 in the Ught of International Law by Mansour Jabbari Gharabagh A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Grad~~te Studies and Research in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Laws Institute of Air and Space Law McGIII University Montreal, auebec Canada November, 1992 (c) Mansour Jabbarl Gharabagh, 1992 • Shorhn.d V.r!uon of th, Th.llS l'. li l Il u r ,- n <lITt f:' : ~lar.'- [Iur .1 ,.1ld, tir l GlJcIr ah agit 1h l' Der M t rr. P Il t : 1 1. " t Jt li f '" (l f (~l r il n d Spa (Ii' 1 ê\ vi /IPqfPE' ~oltth: 1 L • M. 1 l mp cd (, r d d Il a il 0 n : ,1 \1 Ti t? ! '1 9 ,; r h (' t l t 1 p [J f t h P. 1 h ~ c: l " : Un of Wuponl A91inat Civil Aircrlftl Can Study of IRt.55 ln the Llght of Inhrnabonal Law fi Il (1 rt I? ri I? cl ver S l (1 Tl {) t t Il ft t h p~.J ~': L.gal Aspects of the IR655 tragedy ABSTRACT Iran Air Fhght 655 was termlnated by two missile attack on July 3, 1988 The aim of this study is ta analyze the aeranautlcal Incident of July 3, 1988 (IR655) fram the pOint of view of general International law and air law Speclflc attention is glven ta the consideration of the case by the Councii of ICAO, the legal co­ ordination of civil/mlhtary fllght operation and the legal status of NOT AM The study also comments on the concept of self-defense ln Internatlonallaw and responsibility of state.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections USS
    University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections USS (United States Ship) Postal Covers Collection USS Postal Covers Collection. Printed material, 1927–1995. 1.33 feet. Subject collection. Postal covers (1927–1995) from United States ships, including cruisers and destroyer escorts. Many of these covers have been cacheted to commemorate historic figures and events, and are postmarked on board the ships. ________________ Box 1 Folder: 1. USS Albany, CA 123 heavy cruiser, 1946-1953. 2. USS Arkansas, CA 34 heavy cruiser, 1937. 3. USS Astoria, CA 34 heavy cruiser, 1934-1941. 4. USS Augusta, CA 31 heavy cruiser, 1932-1995. 5. USS Baltimore, CA 68 heavy cruiser, 1944-1955. 6. USS Boston, CA 69 heavy cruiser, 1943-1955. 7. USS Bremerton, CA 130 heavy cruiser, 1945-1954. 8. USS California, 1939. 9. USS Canberra, CA 70 heavy cruiser, 1943-1946. 10. USS Chester, CA 27 heavy cruiser, 1930-1943. 11. USS Chicago, CA 29 heavy cruiser, 1932-1946. 12. USS Colorado, CA 7 heavy cruiser, 1937. 13. USS Columbus, CA 74 heavy cruiser, 1945-1958. 14. USS Des Moines, C 15 cruiser, 1915-1953. 15. USS Fall River, CA 131 heavy cruiser, 194?. 16. USS Helena, CA 75 heavy cruiser, 1945-1948. 17. USS Houston, 1938. 18. USS Indianapolis, CA 35 heavy cruiser, 1934-1944. 19. USS Los Angeles, CA 135 heavy cruiser, 1945-1962. 20. USS Louisville, CA 28 heavy cruiser, 1934-1945. 21. USS Macon, CA 132 heavy cruiser, 1947-1959. 22. USS Minneapolis, C 13 cruiser, 1918-1945. 23. USS New Orleans, CA 32 heavy cruiser, 1933-1945.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Help Guide
    TEACHER HELP GUIDE LESSON PLAN: The Nuclear Umbrella – Still Here After the Cold War DEVELOPED BY: John Clark, science teacher and military historian, Deltona High School, Deltona, FL 2012 Naval Historical Foundation STEM-H Teacher Fellowship INSTRUCTIONAL GOAL: (history) The Cold War period is required study under the educational standards of many states. This lesson offers an original way to cover that period in American history and potentially raise student achievement through its uniqueness. BACKGROUND: The Cold War is officially over but the threat from the evolution of nuclear weapons that created that war remains and is growing. Students need to understand that an attack on the United States by a nuclear weapon is still a very real possibility. Make the Cold War come alive for your students by using the resources and web site of the Cold War Gallery at the Naval Museum in Washington, D.C. to educate today’s students about the realities of living under a nuclear umbrella. Focusing on the role of the Navy during this long and tense 45 year period is a great way to build student interest in learning about an important chapter in recent American history. Students will gain a perspective of how living under the nuclear umbrella has evolved to present day. Our future citizens need to internalize the continuing dangers and the threat to American life evolving from the spread of nuclear weapons around the globe. If you cannot come to the museum you can use its resources by taking your students on a virtual tour of the gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • Rear Admiral Frederick Lois Riefkohl By: Tony (The Marine) Santiago
    Rear Admiral Frederick Lois Riefkohl By: Tony (The Marine) Santiago Rear Admiral Frederick Lois Riefkohl Rear Admiral Frederick Lois Riefkohl (February 27, 1889–September 1969), a native of Maunabo, Puerto Rico, was an officer in the United States Navy and the first Puerto Rican to graduate from the United States Naval Academy to be awarded the Navy Cross. The Navy Cross is the second highest medal, after the Medal of Honor, that can be awarded by the U.S. Navy for heroism or distinguished service. He was a World War I Navy Cross recipient who served as Captain of the USS Vicennes during World War II. Early years Born and raised in the town of Maunabo, Riefkohl was the son of Luis Riefkohl and Julia Jaimieson. His older brother was Rudolph Riefkohl, a Colonel in the United States Army Corps of Engineers, who was the first Puerto Rican to receive a "tombstone promotion" of Brigadier General after his death, which technically made him the first Hispanic brigadier general in the United States Army. After he graduated from high school, Riefkohl received an appointment on July 5, 1907, from Beekman Winthrop, the U.S. appointed governor of Puerto Rico from 1904 to 1907, to attend the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland In 1911, he became the first Puerto Rican to graduate from the Academy. During World War I, Lieutenant Riefkohl served as Commander of the Armed Guard of the USS Philadelphia and on August 2, 1917 he was awarded the Navy Cross for engaging an enemy submarine. The Navy Cross is the second highest medal that can be awarded by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the US Navy Into an Effective
    The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeff T. Reardon August 2008 © 2008 Jeff T. Reardon All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 by JEFF T. REARDON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Marvin E. Fletcher Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT REARDON, JEFF T., Ph.D., August 2008, History The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942-1943 (373 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Marvin E. Fletcher On the night of August 8-9, 1942, American naval forces supporting the amphibious landings at Guadalcanal and Tulagi Islands suffered a humiliating defeat in a nighttime clash against the Imperial Japanese Navy. This was, and remains today, the U.S. Navy’s worst defeat at sea. However, unlike America’s ground and air forces, which began inflicting disproportionate losses against their Japanese counterparts at the outset of the Solomon Islands campaign in August 1942, the navy was slow to achieve similar success. The reason the U.S. Navy took so long to achieve proficiency in ship-to-ship combat was due to the fact that it had not adequately prepared itself to fight at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]