DOCSLIB.ORG

Dynallax: Dynamic Parallax Barrier Autostereoscopic Display

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dynallax: Dynamic Parallax Barrier Autostereoscopic Display Dynallax: Dynamic Parallax Barrier Autostereoscopic Display BY THOMAS PETERKA B.S., University of Illinois at Chicago, 1987 M.S., University of Illinois at Chicago, 2003 PH.D. DISSERTATION Submitted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computer Science in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Chicago, 2007 Chicago, Illinois This thesis is dedicated to Melinda, Chris, and Amanda, who always believed in me, and whose confidence helped me believe in myself. Graduate school would never have been possible without their love and support, and for this I will always be grateful. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the following individuals for their assistance and support. • Andrew Johnson of the Electronic Visualization Laboratory (EVL), University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) for advising me during my Ph.D. studies, for serving on the dissertation committee and for providing valuable feedback and critical reviews of my writing • Dan Sandin of EVL, UIC for introducing me to autostereoscopy, for providing the opportunity to work with him in this exciting field, for serving on the dissertation committee, and for many years of dedication to the advancement of VR as both an art and a science • Jason Leigh, EVL, UIC for serving on the dissertation committee and providing guidance, support, insight, and funding for my work • Tom DeFanti, EVL, UIC, UCSD, for making time to serve on my committee, and for his ongoing support and friendship for many years at EVL • Jurgen Schulze, UCSD, for taking the time and effort to travel from San Diego to Chicago to serve on the committee and for his interest and willingness to participate TP iv TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Problem statement .........................................................................................................1 1.2 Features and modes ...................................................................................................1 1.3 Prototype system ...........................................................................................................3 2. BACKGROUND.............................................................................................................................4 2.1 Types of computer images.............................................................................................4 2.2 Virtual reality (VR) and AS VR....................................................................................5 2.3 Tracking overview.........................................................................................................6 2.4 Rendering multiple perspectives via the graphics rendering pipeline ...........................8 2.5 Introduction to parallax barrier AS................................................................................9 2.6 AS systems literature review .......................................................................................11 2.6.1 Spatial multiplexing.....................................................................................................12 2.6.2 Temporal – spatial multiplexing..................................................................................13 2.6.3 Volumetric and holographic displays ..........................................................................14 2.7 AS rendering algorithms..............................................................................................17 2.8 Optimizations ..............................................................................................................18 2.9 Light fields ..................................................................................................................20 3. SOLID STATE DYNAMIC PARALLAX BARRIER .................................................................22 3.1 Motivation ...................................................................................................................22 3.2 Solid state dynamic barrier..........................................................................................23 3.3 LCD technology primer...............................................................................................24 3.4 Stacked LCD construction...........................................................................................26 3.5 Features and advantages for parallax barrier AS.........................................................28 4. IMPLEMENTATION ...................................................................................................................29 4.1 System structure ..........................................................................................................29 4.1.1 Computation ................................................................................................................29 4.1.2 Display ........................................................................................................................31 4.2 Dynallax software........................................................................................................34 4.2.1 Software structure........................................................................................................35 4.2.2 Master module.............................................................................................................35 4.2.3 Slave module...............................................................................................................36 4.2.4 Controller module .......................................................................................................36 4.2.5 User interface ..............................................................................................................38 4.3 Auxiliary software components...................................................................................40 4.3.1 Window management..................................................................................................40 4.3.2 Configuration management .........................................................................................40 4.3.3 Message passing..........................................................................................................41 4.4 Calibration and test patterns........................................................................................44 v 5. RESULTS .....................................................................................................................................47 5.1 Variable parameters.....................................................................................................47 5.1.1 3D – 2D switchable display.........................................................................................48 5.1.2 Barrier period adjustment ............................................................................................49 5.1.3 Barrier duty cycle adjustment......................................................................................50 5.1.4 Barrier angle adjustment..............................................................................................51 5.2 Side effects ..................................................................................................................53 5.2.1 Physical and virtual barrier registration.......................................................................53 5.2.2 Reduced color shifts ....................................................................................................53 5.3 Sub-pixel barrier..........................................................................................................55 5.3.1 Discrete barrier model .................................................................................................56 5.3.2 Continuous barrier model............................................................................................61 5.3.3 Final algorithm ............................................................................................................62 5.4 View distance and channel separation.........................................................................68 5.4.1 The effect of view distance on channel output ............................................................68 5.4.2 View distance equations..............................................................................................72 5.4.3 Optimal view distance algorithm.................................................................................73 5.4.4 Results .........................................................................................................................76 5.5 Rapid channel steering ................................................................................................77 5.6 Two viewer mode........................................................................................................80 5.6.1 Repetition of virtual lobes ...........................................................................................81 5.6.2 General optimization algorithm...................................................................................83 5.6.3 Two viewer optimizations ...........................................................................................84 5.6.3.1 One degree of freedom direct barrier period computation .........................................85
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dualcad : Intégrer La Réalité Augmentée Et Les Interfaces D'ordinateurs De Bureau Dans Un Contexte De Conception Assistée Par Ordinateur
    ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ À L’ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE À L’OBTENTION DE LA MAÎTRISE AVEC MÉMOIRE EN GÉNIE LOGICIEL M. Sc. A. PAR Alexandre MILLETTE DUALCAD : INTÉGRER LA RÉALITÉ AUGMENTÉE ET LES INTERFACES D'ORDINATEURS DE BUREAU DANS UN CONTEXTE DE CONCEPTION ASSISTÉE PAR ORDINATEUR MONTRÉAL, LE 27 AVRIL 2016 Alexandre Millette, 2016 Cette licence Creative Commons signifie qu’il est permis de diffuser, d’imprimer ou de sauvegarder sur un autre support une partie ou la totalité de cette œuvre à condition de mentionner l’auteur, que ces utilisations soient faites à des fins non commerciales et que le contenu de l’œuvre n’ait pas été modifié. PRÉSENTATION DU JURY CE MÉMOIRE A ÉTÉ ÉVALUÉ PAR UN JURY COMPOSÉ DE : M. Michael J. McGuffin, directeur de mémoire Département de génie logiciel et des TI à l’École de technologie supérieure M. Luc Duong, président du jury Département de génie logiciel et des TI à l’École de technologie supérieure M. David Labbé, membre du jury Département de génie logiciel et des TI à l’École de technologie supérieure IL A FAIT L’OBJET D’UNE SOUTENANCE DEVANT JURY ET PUBLIC LE 6 AVRIL 2016 À L’ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE AVANT-PROPOS Lorsqu’il m’est venu le temps de choisir si je désirais faire une maîtrise avec ou sans mémoire, les technologies à Réalité Augmentée (RA) étaient encore des embryons de projets, entrepris par des compagnies connues pour leurs innovations, telles que Google avec leur Google Glasses, ou par des compagnies émergentes, telles que META et leur Spaceglasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Stereo 3D (Depth) from 2D
    Stereo 3D (Depth) from 2D • 3D information is lost by Viewing Stereo projection. Stereograms • How do we recover 3D Autostereograms information? Depth from Stereo Image 3D Model Depth Cues Shadows: Occlusions: Shading: Size Constancy Perspective Illusions (perspective): Height in Plane: Texture Gradient: 3D from 2D + Accommodation • Accommodation (Focus) • Change in lens curvature • Eye Vengeance according to object depth. • Effective depth: 20-300 cm. • Motion. • Stereo Accommodation Eye Vergence • Change in lens curvature • Change in lens curvature according to object depth. according to object depth. • Effective depth: 20-300 cm. • Effective depth: up to 6 m. Motion: Motion: Stereo Vision • In a system with 2 cameras (eyes), 2 different images are captured. • The "disparity" between the images is larger for closer objects: 1 disp ∝ depth • "Fusion" of these 2 images gives disparities depth information. Left Right Right Eye Left Eye Right Eye Left Eye Image Separation for Stereo • Special Glasses • Red/green images with red/green glasses. • Orthogonal Polarization • Alternating Shuttering Optic System Optic System Parlor Stereo Viewer 1850 Viewmaster 1939 ViduTech 2011 Active Shutter System Red/Green Filters Anaglyphs Anaglyphs How they Work Orthogonal Polarization Orthogonal Polarization Linear Polarizers: 2 polarized projectors are used (or alternating polarization) Orthogonal Polarization Orthogonal Polarization Circular Polarizers: Circular Polarizers: Left handed Right handed Orthogonal Polarization TV and Computer Screens Polarized Glasses Circular Polarizer Glasses: Same as polarizers – but reverse light direction Left handed Right handed Glasses Free TV and Glasses Free TV and Computer Screens Computer Screens Parallax Stereogram Parallax Stereogram Parallax Barrier display Uses Vertical Slits Blocks part of screen from each eye Glasses Free TV and Glasses Free TV and Computer Screens Computer Screens Lenticular lens method Lenticular lens method Uses lens arrays to send different Image to each eye.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review and Selective Analysis of 3D Display Technologies for Anatomical Education
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2018 A Review and Selective Analysis of 3D Display Technologies for Anatomical Education Matthew Hackett University of Central Florida Part of the Anatomy Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Doctoral Dissertation (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Hackett, Matthew, "A Review and Selective Analysis of 3D Display Technologies for Anatomical Education" (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 6408. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/6408 A REVIEW AND SELECTIVE ANALYSIS OF 3D DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES FOR ANATOMICAL EDUCATION by: MATTHEW G. HACKETT BSE University of Central Florida 2007, MSE University of Florida 2009, MS University of Central Florida 2012 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Modeling and Simulation program in the College of Engineering and Computer Science at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Summer Term 2018 Major Professor: Michael Proctor ©2018 Matthew Hackett ii ABSTRACT The study of anatomy is complex and difficult for students in both graduate and undergraduate education. Researchers have attempted to improve anatomical education with the inclusion of three-dimensional visualization, with the prevailing finding that 3D is beneficial to students. However, there is limited research on the relative efficacy of different 3D modalities, including monoscopic, stereoscopic, and autostereoscopic displays.
    [Show full text]
  • State-Of-The-Art in Holography and Auto-Stereoscopic Displays
    State-of-the-art in holography and auto-stereoscopic displays Daniel Jönsson <Ersätt med egen bild> 2019-05-13 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Auto-stereoscopic displays ........................................................................................................................... 5 Two-View Autostereoscopic Displays ....................................................................................................... 5 Multi-view Autostereoscopic Displays ...................................................................................................... 7 Light Field Displays .................................................................................................................................. 10 Market ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Display panels ......................................................................................................................................... 14 AR ............................................................................................................................................................ 14 Application Fields ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Companies .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-User Display Systems, Compendium of the State of the Art
    Multi-user display systems, Compendium of the State of the Art. Juan Sebastian Munoz-Arango; Research Assistant EAC - UA Little Rock; Little Rock, AR, Dirk Reiners; Research Scientist EAC - UA Little Rock; Little Rock, AR Carolina Cruz-Neira; Research Director EAC - UA Little Rock; Little Rock, AR Abstract egories: Spatial Barriers, Optical Filtering, Optical Routing and One of the main shortcomings of most Virtual Reality display sys- Time Multiplexing. tems, be it head-mounted displays or projection based systems like In addition to these categories it is worth mentioning volu- CAVEs, is that they can only provide the correct perspective to a metric displays and light field displays, which are relevant to the single user. This is a significant limitation that reduces the appli- multi user viewing topic even though they achieve multi user per- cability of Virtual Reality approaches for most kinds of group col- spective through a totally different approach. laborative work, which is becoming more and more important in many disciplines. Different approaches have been tried to present Spatial barriers multiple images to different users at the same time, like optical Spatial barriers take advantage of the display’s physical config- barriers, optical filtering, optical routing, time multiplex, volu- uration and user placement to display users’ specific views. Es- metric displays and lightfield displays among others. This paper sentially they form a mechanical barrier that lets each user see a describes, discusses and compares different approaches that have subset of the underlying displays’ pixels. been developed and develop an evaluation approach to identify The spatial barriers approach has been around for a while.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAPHICS HARDWARE WHAT’S in STORE GRAPHICS CARDS GRAPHICS CARDS DEDICATED (EXTERNAL) High Performance Power Consumption Heat Emission
    10 COMPUTER GRAPHICS HARDWARE WHAT’S IN STORE GRAPHICS CARDS GRAPHICS CARDS DEDICATED (EXTERNAL) High performance Power consumption Heat emission INTEGRATED (INTERNAL) Low power, low heat Mobile devices, on board Integrated with CPU ARCHITECTURE VERTEX SHADERS (TRANSFORM GEOMETRY) GEOMETRY SHADERS (CREATE NEW GEOMETRY) PIXEL SHADERS (COLORS, SHADOWS…) UNIFIED SHADERS One type of processors for all operations GTX 680 = 1536 unified shader cores CUDA, GPGPU General (not only graphics) performed on GPU Parallelism (HW video encoding, numerical computations) CONNECTORS VGA Analog DVI Digital + Analog HDMI Digital miniHDMI, microHDMI DISPLAYPORT Digital, Analog Mini DisplayPort (Apple) MANUFACTURERS NVIDIA GeForce, Quadro, Tesla AMD (FORMERLY ATI) Radeon, FirePro INTEL Integrated in Core CPUs POWERVR ARM Mali DISPLAYS CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANALOG TVS OLD COMPUTER MONITORS MEDIUM SIZE DISPLAYS LIGHT EMISSION Black is black FLICKER 75-100 Hz for work http://www.bthompson.net/ PLASMA (PDP, NEO-PDP) NOT SUITABLE FOR COMPUTER DISPLAYS LARGE SCREENS (30”+) LIGHT EMISSION Black is black HIGH ENERGY DEMANDS VIEW ANGLE DOESN’T MATTER IMAGE RETENTION Reduced for Neo-PDP LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY (LCD) CRYSTALS BLOCK LIGHT FROM BACK SOURCE Black is hard to achieve DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES (TN, IPS, MVA, …) LOW ENERGY CONSUMPTION LARGE SCREENS VIEW ANGLES ISSUE LCD LED CONFUSION OLED (ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE) LIGHT EMISSION GOOD CONTRAST AND COLORS EXPENSIVE PRODUCTION Small screens so far LOW ENERGY POTENTIALLY FLEXIBLE VIEW ANGLE
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Rendering for Multiview Parallax Displays
    Distributed Rendering for Multiview Parallax Displays Annen T.a, Matusik W.b, P¯ster H.b, Seidel H-P.a, Zwicker M.c aMPI, SaarbrucÄ ken, Germany bMERL, Cambridge, MA, USA cMIT, Cambridge, MA, USA ABSTRACT 3D display technology holds great promise for the future of television, virtual reality, entertainment, and visual- ization. Multiview parallax displays deliver stereoscopic views without glasses to arbitrary positions within the viewing zone. These systems must include a high-performance and scalable 3D rendering subsystem in order to generate multiple views at real-time frame rates. This paper describes a distributed rendering system for large-scale multiview parallax displays built with a network of PCs, commodity graphics accelerators, multiple projectors, and multiview screens. The main challenge is to render various perspective views of the scene and assign rendering tasks e®ectively. In this paper we investigate two di®erent approaches: Optical multiplexing for lenticular screens and software multiplexing for parallax-barrier displays. We describe the construction of large- scale multi-projector 3D display systems using lenticular and parallax-barrier technology. We have developed di®erent distributed rendering algorithms using the Chromium stream-processing framework and evaluate the trade-o®s and performance bottlenecks. Our results show that Chromium is well suited for interactive rendering on multiview parallax displays. Keywords: Multiview Parallax Displays, Distributed Rendering, Software/Optical Multiplexing, Automatic Calibration 1. INTRODUCTION For more than a century, the display of true three-dimensional images has inspired the imagination and ingenu- ity of engineers and inventors. Ideally, such 3D displays provide stereopsis (i.e., binocular perception of depth), kineopsis (i.e., depth perception from motion parallax), and accommodation (i.e., depth perception through fo- cusing).
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Stereoscopic 3D Glasses for Gaming
    ISSN: 2278 – 1323 International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering & Technology (IJARCET) Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2016 Review of Stereoscopic 3D Glasses for Gaming Yogesh Bhimsen Joshi, Avinash Gautam Waywal sound cards and CD-ROMs had the multimedia Abstract— Only a decade ago, watching in 3-D capability. meant seeing through a pair of red and blue glasses. Early 3D games such as Alpha Waves, Starglider 2 It was really great at first sight, but 3-D technology began with flat-shaded graphics and then has been moving on. Scientists have been aware of progressed with simple forms of texture mapping how human vision works and current generation of such as in Wolfenstein 3D. computers are more powerful than ever before. In the early 1990s, the most popular method of Therefore, most of the computer users are familiar with 3-D games. Back in the '90s, most of the publishing games for smaller developers was enthusiasts were amazed by the game Castle shareware distribution, including then-fledgling Wolfenstein 3D, which took place in a maze-like companies such as Apogee which is now branded as castle, which was existed in three dimensions. 3D Realms, Epic MegaGames (now known as Epic Nowadays, gamers can enjoy even more complicated Games), and id Software. It enabled consumers the graphics with the available peripherals. This paper opportunity to try a trial portion of the game, which gives an overview of this 3-D Gaming technology and was restricted to complete first section or an episode various gaming peripherals. This paper will also of full version of the game, before purchasing it.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolby 3D for Glasses-Free TV and Devices — Preliminary Table of Contents
    WHITE PAPER — PRELIMINARY Dolby® 3D for Glasses-Free TV and Devices Overview Three-dimensional television (3D TV) offers tremendous market potential, but up to now, the annoyance of the required glasses has limited consumer viewing and slowed adoption. The real future of consumer 3D as an everyday experience that can truly tap into the market lies with glasses-free viewing. While the industry as a whole acknowledges this, glasses-free technology to date has had its own problems, generally suffering from restricted viewing positions and distracting visual artifacts. Dolby® 3D changes that. It is a collection of processing and coding techniques brought to market through a collaboration between Dolby and Philips. The companies recently presented the Dolby 3D suite of innovative technologies to the public, garnering industry awards and accolades. 3D content is consumed from a variety of sources such as packaged media, broadcasts, and over the top (OTT) streaming. It is viewed on a variety of devices, increasingly including display devices equipped with advanced optical lenses that enable glasses-free viewing. When the Dolby 3D suite of technologies is implemented in devices along the path that 3D content takes to glasses-free 3D displays, Dolby ensures that the viewer’s experience will surpass any previous 3D TV experience. The underlying architectures of these devices must accommodate the complexities of Dolby 3D processing specifications, which are key to ensuring that 3D perception consistently meets the expectations of sophisticated consumers. But what is this underlying technology? How is it feasible in architectures prevalent today? When will all the pieces of the ecosystem come together? This white paper answers these questions in depth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Varriertm Autostereoscopic Virtual Reality Display
    submission id papers_0427 The VarrierTM Autostereoscopic Virtual Reality Display Daniel J. Sandin, Todd Margolis, Jinghua Ge, Javier Girado, Tom Peterka, Thomas A. DeFanti Electronic Visualization Laboratory University of Illinois at Chicago [email protected] Abstract In most other lenticular and barrier strip implementations, stereo is achieved by sorting image slices in integer (image) coordinates. Virtual reality (VR) has long been hampered by the gear Moreover, many autostereo systems compress scene depth in the z needed to make the experience possible; specifically, stereo direction to improve image quality but Varrier is orthoscopic, glasses and tracking devices. Autostereoscopic display devices are which means that all 3 dimensions are displayed in the same gaining popularity by freeing the user from stereo glasses, scale. Besides head-tracked perspective interaction, the user can however few qualify as VR displays. The Electronic Visualization further interact with VR applications through hand-held devices Laboratory (EVL) at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) such as a 3d wand, for example to control navigation through has designed and produced a large scale, high resolution head- virtual worlds. tracked barrier-strip autostereoscopic display system that There are four main contributions of this paper. New virtual produces a VR immersive experience without requiring the user to barrier algorithms are presented that enhance image quality and wear any encumbrances. The resulting system, called Varrier, is a lower color shifts by operating at sub-pixel resolution. Automated passive parallax barrier 35-panel tiled display that produces a camera-based registration of the physical and virtual barrier strip wide field of view, head-tracked VR experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Photo-Aligned Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Devices with Novel Electro-Optic Characteristics
    crystals Review Photo-Aligned Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Devices with Novel Electro-Optic Characteristics Vladimir Chigrinov 1,2,* , Qi Guo 3 and Aleksey Kudreyko 4 1 School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528325, China 2 Department of Theoretical Physics, Moscow Region State University, 141014 Mytishi, Russia 3 School of Instrumentation and Optoelectronic Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China; [email protected] 4 Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, Bashkir State Medical University, 450008 Ufa, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 18 May 2020; Accepted: 19 June 2020; Published: 1 July 2020 Abstract: This paper examines different applications of ferroelectric liquid crystal devices based on photo-alignment. Successful application of the photo-alignment technique is considered to be a critical breakthrough. A variety of display and photonic devices with azo dye aligned ferroelectric liquid crystals is presented: smart glasses, liquid crystal Pancharatnam–Berry phase optical elements, 2D/3D switchable lenses, and laser therapy devices. Comparison of electro-optical behavior of ferroelectric liquid crystals is described considering the performance of devices. This paper facilitates the optimization of device design, and broadens the possible applications in the display and photonic area. Keywords: photo-alignment of ferroelectric liquid crystals; electro-optic modes; new devices; imaging technologies; displays; photonics 1. Introduction The appearance of portable and wearable devices has led to an ever-increasing demand for next-generation displays with ultra-high resolution, light weight, low power consumption, and high efficiency [1,2]. However, the response time of nematic liquid crystals (LCs) is too slow for fast-switching devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Seefront Gmbh 2013 Seefront‘S Approach to Glasses-Free 3D
    No glasses please! A short introduction to SeeFront‘s glasses-free 3D technology. 1 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 SeeFront‘s approach to glasses-free 3D Let the display wear the 3D glasses! 2 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS A flat-panel display: LCD, OLED, … 3 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS … is equipped with a “3D filter” 4 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS … not functional, yet. 5 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS … not functional, yet… 6 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS … but now. 7 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS Parallax barrier 8 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS Parallax barrier 9 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS Parallax barrier 10 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS Parallax barrier, switched OFF… 11 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS … and switched ON again… 12 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Nintendo 3DS Perceived resolution Good Number of users 1 Freedom of movement No Number of 3D views 1 Single-view 3D display without freedom of movement 13 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy: Multi-view display Another option 14 © SeeFront GmbH 2013 Different approaches to Autostereoscopy:
    [Show full text]