DOCSLIB.ORG

Quality Guide for the Correct Reporting of Ics Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Quality Guide for the Correct Reporting of Ics Data MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR THE REGULATION OF GAMBLING QUALITY GUIDE FOR THE CORRECT REPORTING OF ICS DATA 1. Document objective This document is a guide on the validations made by the General Sub-Directorate General for the Inspection of Gambling (SGIJ) on the files generated and stored by the operators in its Internal Control System (ICS), which can help carry out procedures for quality control of the ICS data on licensed operators. It is not a complete and disaggregated list, but it does reflect the most important validations to date. 2. Document control Version Date Description of the changes 1.0 24 May 2018 Creation of document: Quality guide for the correct reporting of ICS data 2.0 29 March 2019 Update with new validations and controls needed to adapt to version 2.13 of the data model. New appendix on test players 3.0 29 October 2019 Update of the new controls and validations put in place since the document’s last update 3.1 22 June 2020 Update of the new controls and validations put in place since the document’s last update 3.2 29 September 2020 Update of the new controls and validations put in place since the document’s last update 3.3 28 October de 2020 Update of the new controls and validations put in place since the document’s last update 3.4 23 March de 2021 New Appendix for the correct use of ‘Actualizado’ field Page 1 of 76 Quality guide v3.4 MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR THE REGULATION OF GAMBLING 3. Contents 1. DOCUMENT OBJECTIVE ........................................................................................................................... 1 2. DOCUMENT CONTROL ............................................................................................................................. 1 3. CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... 2 4. ABBREVIATIONS USED ............................................................................................................................. 7 5. INTRODUCTION. ..................................................................................................................................... 10 6. FORMAT VALIDATIONS ........................................................................................................................... 10 A. HIGH LEVEL .................................................................................................................................................. 10 a) General ............................................................................................................................................................. 10 b) RU ..................................................................................................................................................................... 11 c) CJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 14 d) OP ..................................................................................................................................................................... 14 e) JU ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 f) JUA ................................................................................................................................................................... 15 g) How to correctly report a Registration ............................................................................................................. 16 B. MEDIUM LEVEL ............................................................................................................................................. 19 a) General ............................................................................................................................................................. 19 b) RU ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20 c) CJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21 d) JU ...................................................................................................................................................................... 22 C. LOW LEVEL ................................................................................................................................................... 23 a) General ............................................................................................................................................................. 23 b) RU ..................................................................................................................................................................... 23 c) OPT ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 d) JU ...................................................................................................................................................................... 24 7. CONTENT VALIDATIONS.......................................................................................................................... 24 A. HIGH LEVEL .................................................................................................................................................. 25 a) General ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 B. MEDIUM LEVEL ............................................................................................................................................. 25 a) General ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 b) RU ..................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Page 2 of 76 Quality guide v3.4 MINISTRY OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR THE REGULATION OF GAMBLING c) CJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 d) OP .................................................................................................................................................................... 27 C. LOW LEVEL ................................................................................................................................................... 30 a) RU .................................................................................................................................................................... 30 8. EXTERNAL VALIDATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 30 A. HIGH LEVEL .................................................................................................................................................. 30 a) CJ ...................................................................................................................................................................... 30 B. MEDIUM LEVEL ............................................................................................................................................. 30 a) RU .................................................................................................................................................................... 30 b) RUD versus JUD ................................................................................................................................................ 31 c) BOT .................................................................................................................................................................. 31 d) OPT versus BOT ................................................................................................................................................ 32 e) OPT versus CJT versus JUT ................................................................................................................................ 32 f) BOT versus JUT ................................................................................................................................................. 32 g) JU versus JUA versus CEV ................................................................................................................................. 32 h) ORT versus OPT ................................................................................................................................................ 32 i) JUD versus RUG ................................................................................................................................................ 33 9. CONTROLS ............................................................................................................................................. 33 A. ABSENCES
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sports Panel Argentina
    1 / 6 Sports Panel Argentina Features Size (ISO): number of panelists according to ISO 26362 Panel size (ISO): 71.139 Real delivery: maximum sample size of a specific target that we can deliver on a real People profiled (ISO): 7.949 project. It is the sum of profiled panelists and the estimated number of panelists not yet Estimated response rate (ISO): 44% profiled. Updated: 15/12/2014 IR% Panel: panel Netquest's incidence rate for the particular target. It is not obtained from a representative population sample. It is the result of a progressive and random panel data collection. It shows the difficulty of the target: Sociodemographic profile Real delivery Panel IR% Total panelists: 27.920 100,0% Sex Man 10.083 Woman 15.938 Age <18 80 18-24 3.499 25-34 7.704 35-44 7.296 45-54 5.140 55-64 1.962 >=65 291 Social class Level 1: E 53 Level 2: D2 1.116 Level 3: D1 3.872 Level 4: C3 6.001 Level 5: C2 8.619 Level 6: C1 6.089 Level 7: AB 214 Regions NOA- Northwest Argentina 999 Cuyo 1.160 Humid Pampa 15.890 NEA - Northeast Argentina 1.022 Patagonia 621 Autonomous City of Buenos Aires 6.280 2 / 6 Provinces Autonomous City of Buenos Aires 6.280 Buenos Aires 11.205 Córdoba 2.563 Santa Fe 1.997 Mendoza 923 Tucumán 313 Entre Ríos 315 Salta 370 Misiones 236 Chaco 182 Corrientes 189 Santiago del Estero 52 Jujuy 107 San Juan 103 Río Negro 180 Formosa 28 Neuquén 182 Chubut 129 San Luis 132 Catamarca 53 La Rioja 50 La Pampa 77 Santa Cruz 56 Tierra del Fuego, Antarctica and South Atlantic Islands 25 3 / 6 Sports practice Real delivery Panel IR% Total panelists:
    [Show full text]
  • Zerohack Zer0pwn Youranonnews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men
    Zerohack Zer0Pwn YourAnonNews Yevgeniy Anikin Yes Men YamaTough Xtreme x-Leader xenu xen0nymous www.oem.com.mx www.nytimes.com/pages/world/asia/index.html www.informador.com.mx www.futuregov.asia www.cronica.com.mx www.asiapacificsecuritymagazine.com Worm Wolfy Withdrawal* WillyFoReal Wikileaks IRC 88.80.16.13/9999 IRC Channel WikiLeaks WiiSpellWhy whitekidney Wells Fargo weed WallRoad w0rmware Vulnerability Vladislav Khorokhorin Visa Inc. Virus Virgin Islands "Viewpointe Archive Services, LLC" Versability Verizon Venezuela Vegas Vatican City USB US Trust US Bankcorp Uruguay Uran0n unusedcrayon United Kingdom UnicormCr3w unfittoprint unelected.org UndisclosedAnon Ukraine UGNazi ua_musti_1905 U.S. Bankcorp TYLER Turkey trosec113 Trojan Horse Trojan Trivette TriCk Tribalzer0 Transnistria transaction Traitor traffic court Tradecraft Trade Secrets "Total System Services, Inc." Topiary Top Secret Tom Stracener TibitXimer Thumb Drive Thomson Reuters TheWikiBoat thepeoplescause the_infecti0n The Unknowns The UnderTaker The Syrian electronic army The Jokerhack Thailand ThaCosmo th3j35t3r testeux1 TEST Telecomix TehWongZ Teddy Bigglesworth TeaMp0isoN TeamHav0k Team Ghost Shell Team Digi7al tdl4 taxes TARP tango down Tampa Tammy Shapiro Taiwan Tabu T0x1c t0wN T.A.R.P. Syrian Electronic Army syndiv Symantec Corporation Switzerland Swingers Club SWIFT Sweden Swan SwaggSec Swagg Security "SunGard Data Systems, Inc." Stuxnet Stringer Streamroller Stole* Sterlok SteelAnne st0rm SQLi Spyware Spying Spydevilz Spy Camera Sposed Spook Spoofing Splendide
    [Show full text]
  • Positive Attitudes Towards Racquet Sport of Primary School Teachers
    No. 2 Supplement, Vol. XVII /2016 G Y M N A S I U M Scientific Journal of Education, Sports, and Health POSITIVE ATTITUDES TOWARDS RACQUET SPORT OF PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS Quintas Hijós Alejandro 1* Pradas de la Fuente, Francisco 2 Castellar Otín, Carlos 3 1,2,3 University of Zaragoza, 4, Calle Valentín Carderera, 22003, Huesca, Spain Keywords: racquet sports, teacher attitudes, primary school. Abstract The aim of this study was to know the attitudes towards racquet sports in Spanish primary school teachers. Eighty one teachers from Zaragoza participated in this study, filling out the scale Positive attitudes towards racquet sport of the validated Table Tennis Attitudes Questionnaire. The internal consistency of this scale was measured with the Cronbach alpha coefficient. The results indicate Md=2.19 (SD=0.38) in this scale. The 27.2% of the teachers have never done one training course of this kind of sports, being the badminton the most studied sport. However, the teachers have mainly badminton teaching material. This study shows which is the prevalence of the racquet sports in the teacher programs. Statistically significant relationships were found between the studies of the teachers or the kind of the school, and the attitudes towards racquet sport. The results of this study suggest us that there have to be more educative programs to implementation racquet sports. 1. Introduction Several studies have shown the good considerations that the sport have in the scholar system (Napper-Owen, Kovar, Ermiler & Mehrhof, 1999; Zabala Lozano, Delgado & Viciana, 2001; Zabala, Viciana & Lozano, 2002; Salinas & Viciana, 2006). But other researches teach us that some contents are more relevance than other is teacher’s programming (Napper-Owen et al., 1999; Zabala et al., 2002; Robles, 2008; Robles, 2009), thus it’s necessary to know the amount and the teacher’s reasons of their presence at the school (Robles, Tomás, Castillo, Giménez & Robles, 2013; Robles, Giménez, Abad & Robles, 2015; Iglesias, 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • List of Sports
    List of sports The following is a list of sports/games, divided by cat- egory. There are many more sports to be added. This system has a disadvantage because some sports may fit in more than one category. According to the World Sports Encyclopedia (2003) there are 8,000 indigenous sports and sporting games.[1] 1 Physical sports 1.1 Air sports Wingsuit flying • Parachuting • Banzai skydiving • BASE jumping • Skydiving Lima Lima aerobatics team performing over Louisville. • Skysurfing Main article: Air sports • Wingsuit flying • Paragliding • Aerobatics • Powered paragliding • Air racing • Paramotoring • Ballooning • Ultralight aviation • Cluster ballooning • Hopper ballooning 1.2 Archery Main article: Archery • Gliding • Marching band • Field archery • Hang gliding • Flight archery • Powered hang glider • Gungdo • Human powered aircraft • Indoor archery • Model aircraft • Kyūdō 1 2 1 PHYSICAL SPORTS • Sipa • Throwball • Volleyball • Beach volleyball • Water Volleyball • Paralympic volleyball • Wallyball • Tennis Members of the Gotemba Kyūdō Association demonstrate Kyūdō. 1.4 Basketball family • Popinjay • Target archery 1.3 Ball over net games An international match of Volleyball. Basketball player Dwight Howard making a slam dunk at 2008 • Ball badminton Summer Olympic Games • Biribol • Basketball • Goalroball • Beach basketball • Bossaball • Deaf basketball • Fistball • 3x3 • Footbag net • Streetball • • Football tennis Water basketball • Wheelchair basketball • Footvolley • Korfball • Hooverball • Netball • Peteca • Fastnet • Pickleball
    [Show full text]
  • Análisis Notacional Informatizado Del
    Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte / International Journal of Medicine and Science of Physical Activity and Sport ISSN: 1577-0354 [email protected] Universidad Autónoma de Madrid España Alonso Roque, J.I.; Argudo Iturriaga, F. ANÁLISIS NOTACIONAL INFORMATIZADO DEL RENDIMIENTO DEL SAQUE EN FRONTENIS OLÍMPICO Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte / International Journal of Medicine and Science of Physical Activity and Sport, vol. 11, núm. 42, junio, 2011, pp. 421- 438 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid, España Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=54222171012 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Rev.int.med.cienc.act.fís.deporte- vol. 11 - número 42 - junio 2011 - ISSN: 1577-0354 Alonso Roque, J.I. y Argudo Iturriaga, F. (2011). Análisis notacional informatizado del rendimiento del saque en frontenis olímpico. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte vol. 11 (42) pp. 421-439. Http://cdeporte.rediris.es/revista/revista42/artanalisis218.htm ORIGINAL ANÁLISIS NOTACIONAL INFORMATIZADO DEL RENDIMIENTO DEL SAQUE EN FRONTENIS OLÍMPICO COMPUTERIZED NOTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SERVING PERFORMANCE ON OLYMPIC FRONTENNIS Alonso Roque, J.I.1 y Argudo Iturriaga, F.2 1 Universidad de Murcia, España. [email protected] 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España. [email protected] Código UNESCO: 5899 / 6301.02 deporte Clasificación del Consejo de Europa: Recibido 26 de noviembre de 2009 Aceptado 25 de febrero de 2010 RESUMEN Un sistema computerizado se utilizó para analizar uno de los indicadores de rendimiento más importantes dentro de los deportes de raqueta: el saque.
    [Show full text]
  • Sports Panel Chile
    1 / 5 Sports Panel Chile Features Size (ISO): number of panelists according to ISO 26362 Panel size (ISO): 47.260 Real delivery: maximum sample size of a specific target that we can deliver on a real People profiled (ISO): 4.389 project. It is the sum of profiled panelists and the estimated number of panelists not yet Estimated response rate (ISO): 41% profiled. Updated: 15/12/2014 IR% Panel: panel Netquest's incidence rate for the particular target. It is not obtained from a representative population sample. It is the result of a progressive and random panel data collection. It shows the difficulty of the target: Sociodemographic profile Real delivery Panel IR% Total panelists: 18.446 100,0% Sex Man 8.282 Woman 9.415 Age <18 70 18-24 2.753 25-34 5.705 35-44 4.807 45-54 3.031 55-64 1.181 >=65 114 Social class ABC1 6.899 C2 8.270 C3 2.082 D 378 E 31 Regions I Region of Tarapacá 120 II Region of Antofagasta 313 III Region of Atacama 83 IV Region of Coquimbo 298 V Region of Valparaíso 1.424 VI Region of Libertador General Bernardo O'Higgins 325 VII Region of Maule 340 VIII Region of Bío Bío 1.367 IX Region of La Araucanía 421 X Region of los Lagos 401 XI Region of Aysén del General Carlos Ibañez del Campo 16 XII Region of Magallanes & la Antártica Chilena 85 XIII Region Metropolitana 12.081 XIV Region of Los Ríos 209 XV Region of Arica & Parinacota 104 Grouped regions North 2.395 South 3.220 Metropolitan region 12.081 2 / 5 Sports practice Real delivery Panel IR% Total panelists: 18.446 100,0% Practice sport Yes, in a professional way 172
    [Show full text]
  • Faq Competiciones Externas
    SPORTS FACILITIES FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS Who can reserve sports facilities? Sports facilities can be reserved by sports members, members of the university community, and users outside of UPV: UPV organisations and external organisations can reserve facilities by requesting authorisation on the gregal system available at http://www.upv.es/entidades/AD/info/802377normalc.html What facilities can I reserve? The reservations which can be reserved are: Facilities for team sports or racket sports: badminton, basketball, handball, frontenis, indoor football, 7-a-side football, 11-a-side football, paddle tennis, pelota, squash, tennis, table tennis, volleyball, or beach volleyball. What facilities are for individual use? The velodrome, climbing wall, bouldering area, campus board, and athletics track. They are for individual use for a determined period of time. Once I become a member where can I make a reservation? 1.-Reservations for racket sport facilities or team sport facilities can be made on the sport department website http://www.upv.es/entidades/AD/info/792321normalc.html or in person at any sports building. Payment can be made with a bank card. 2.-The reservation of facilities for individual use can be made in person at the sports building where the facility can be found. Payment can be made using a bank card. How much time in advance can I make a reservation? Facilities for racket sports and team sports: Sports members can make reservations 8 days in advance, 24 hours before others from the university community. Users from the university community who are not sports members may reserve facilities 7 days in advance.
    [Show full text]
  • AMAYA Sport En España
    ÍNDICE - INDEX 1. Educación especial - Special education 1.2. Psicomotricidad - Psycomovement. 10 1.3. Piscinas sensoriales - Sensorial pools. 68 1.4. Pelotas y figuras de foam y foam recubierto - Foam and coated foam balls and figures. 72 90 3. Juegos tradicionales y deportes alternativos - Traditional games and alternative sports. 5.1. Juegos y deportes alternativos - Alternative sports and games. 128 5.2. Cometas - Kites. 149 5.3. Pelotas infantiles - Children balls. 150 4. Malabares y juegos de habilidad - Juggling and hability games. 6.1. Yo-yos 157 6.2. Diabolos 160 6.3. Malabares - Juggling. 163 6.4. Juegos de habilidad - Hability games. 165 5. Juegos de agua y natación - Water games and swiming. 171 6. Deportes, accesorios y complementos - Sports, accesories and complements. 3.1. Fútbol - Football. 181 3.2. Fútbol sala - Indoor football. 193 3.3. Balonmano - Handball. 194 3.4. Baloncesto - Basketball. 197 3.5. Voleibol - Volleyball. 206 3.6. Tenis - Tennis. 209 3.7. Bádminton - Badminton. 211 3.8. Pádel - Paddle tennis. 214 3.9. Tenis de mesa - Table tennis. 215 3.10. Pelota vasca. 216 3.11. Beisbol - Baseball. 217 3.12. Atletismo - Athletics. 220 3.13. Rugby. 223 7. Gimnasia rítmica - Rhytmic gymnastic 224 8. Ballet 243 8. Gimnasia - Gymnastic 247 9. Colchonetas - Mats 252 10. Accesorios y complementos - Accesoires and complements 260 PSICOMOTRICIDAD - PSYCOMOVEMENT 412 300 BALANCE BOARD TORTUGA El balance board más completo y funcional, que permite balancearse de lado a lado de forma segura y controlada gracias a los hexágonos antideslizantes de la base. Proporciona un movimiento más suave y fácil de controlar.
    [Show full text]
  • Deporte C C D 243
    deporte C C D 243 Efecto del cambio de reglas en pelota vasca escolar Effect of rule changes in school-league basque pelota Oidui Usabiaga Arruabarrena, Julen Castellano Paulis Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte. Universidad del País Vasco UPV/EHU. España. CORRESPONDENCIA: Oidui Usabiaga Arruabarrena ฀฀฀฀฀฀ [email protected] Resumen Abstract El objetivo del presente estudio fue analizar la in- The aim of this study was to analyse the effect fluencia de las modificaciones de reglas en la acción de of rule modifications on the game actions of juego de los escolares que participaron en un programa the schoolchildren that participated in a basque de deporte escolar de pelota a mano. La muestra estuvo pelota school program. The sample consisted of 60 compuesta por 60 escolares de 8 a 12 años, 35 participa- schoolchildren ranging in age from 8 to 12 years. ron en seis partidos celebrados durante el curso 2007-08 Thirty-five children participated in six games held y los 25 restantes en otros seis enfrentamientos del 2008- during the 2007-08 year, and the remaining 25 children 09. El registro se llevó a cabo mediante un instrumento participated in six games during the 2008-09 year. Data observacional ad hoc y posteriormente se realizó un registry was carried out by an ad hoc observational análisis de las variables: zona y tipo de golpe, ubicación instrument followed by an analysis of the following espacial en situación de espera y dirección del saque, variables: shot area and type, spatial location when resto y juego de intercambio.
    [Show full text]
  • Basque Pelota from the Ground up AURKIBIDEA / TABLE of CONTENTS
    Issue 74 Year 2006 Basque pelota from the ground up AURKIBIDEA / TABLE OF CONTENTS GAURKO GAIAK / CURRENT EVENTS Basque pelota 3 • Aurkezpena José Ramón Garai Issue 74 Year 2006 5 • Olympic sport since 1900 7 • Variations Basque pelota Juan Ramón Arrasate, cesta punta player: from the 10 • ground up Miami, the uncertain future of jai alai 12 • Kepa Arroitajauregi, Euskadi Federation of Basque Pelota: «Despite the complicated panorama, there are solutions» 14 • Erramun Osa, Federation of Ikastolas: «Efforts are being made to find the right approach to teaching Basque pelota» 16 • Not just for boys Issue 74 Year 2006 17 • The importance of an image 18 • A strategic plan for the next four years EGILEA / AUTHOR 20 • Anton Mendizabal, sculptor: «Oteiza Eusko Jaurlaritza-Kanpo made me see the fronton with different eyes» Harremanetarako Idazkaritza Nagusia Gobierno Vasco-Secretaría General EUSKADITIK / THE LATEST FROM de Acción Exterior EUSKADI C/ Navarra, 2 24 • Euskadi strengthens ties 01007 VITORIA-GASTEIZ Phone: 945 01 7900 with Lower Silesia [email protected] 25 • The Basque language in the European ZUZENDARIA / DIRECTOR Union Josu Legarreta Bilbao 26 • The Bilbao Transporter Bridge, World KOORDINAKETA ETA IDAZKETA Heritage Site Kazeta5 Komunikazioa [email protected] EUSKAL ETXEAK / BASQUE CENTERS ARGAZKIAK / PHOTOGRAPHS Mikel Arrazola 27 • 35 Gaztemundu participants in Euskal Herria -Archivo Gobierno Vasco- 28 • Azkarraga signs agreements with Costa Rica and the Dominican ARGITARATZAILEA / EDITOR Republic Eusko Jaurlaritzaren Argitalpen 29 • Basque wedding in Shanghai. The Bihotzetik Choir from Boise holds its Zerbitzu Nagusia 20th anniversary in Euskadi Servicio Central de Publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco CUISINE DISEINU ETA MAKETAZIOA 31 • Iñigo Lavado, Restaurante Ficoba (Gipuzkoa trade Didart show).
    [Show full text]
  • Computerized Notational Analysis of Serving Performance on Racket And
    Rev.int.med.cienc.act.fís.deporte- vol. 11 - número 42 - junio 2011 - ISSN: 1577-0354 Alonso Roque, J.I. y Argudo Iturriaga, F. (2011). Análisis notacional informatizado del rendimiento del saque en frontenis olímpico. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte vol. 11 (42) pp. 421-439. Http://cdeporte.rediris.es/revista/revista42/artanalisis218.htm ORIGINAL ANÁLISIS NOTACIONAL INFORMATIZADO DEL RENDIMIENTO DEL SAQUE EN FRONTENIS OLÍMPICO COMPUTERIZED NOTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF SERVING PERFORMANCE ON OLYMPIC FRONTENNIS Alonso Roque, J.I.1 y Argudo Iturriaga, F.2 1 Universidad de Murcia, España. [email protected] 2 Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, España. [email protected] Código UNESCO: 5899 / 6301.02 deporte Clasificación del Consejo de Europa: Recibido 26 de noviembre de 2009 Aceptado 25 de febrero de 2010 RESUMEN Un sistema computerizado se utilizó para analizar uno de los indicadores de rendimiento más importantes dentro de los deportes de raqueta: el saque. Mediante la grabación y posterior análisis del Campeonato del Mundo de Pelota Vasca 2002, se profundizó sobre el saque teniendo en cuenta que la modalidad deportiva analizada, el frontenis olímpico, cuenta con espacios verticales de impacto de la pelota y se juega 2 vs. 2, lo que lo diferencia de otros deportes de raqueta y muro como el squash o el raquetball. Se grabaron 1226 saques masculinos, dividiéndose los equipos en dos niveles en función de su clasificación final. Se diseñó un software específico para el análisis bidimensional de las imágenes y la gestión de los datos. PALABRAS CLAVE: análisis de partidos computerizado, indicadores de rendimiento, saque, deportes raqueta y muro.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Goals Scored by Players with Cerebral
    Yanci, J.: ANALYSIS OF GOALS SCORED BY PLAYERS WITH CEREBRAL... Kinesiology 47(2015)2:202-207 ANALYSIS OF GOALS SCORED BY PLAYERS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY IN OFFICIAL FOOTBALL 7-A-SIDE MATCHES Javier Yanci Faculty of Physical Activity and Sports Science, University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain Original scientific paper UDC: 796.332-056.29 Abstract: The purpose of this study was to analyze goals scored in football 7-a-side matches by players with cerebral palsy (CP) in terms of when they occur in the game, what their characteristics are, what part of the body is used and from what part of the field shots have been taken. This study analysed 23 football matches corresponding to two Football 7-a-side Spanish Championships for players with CP held over two consecutive seasons. A total of 10 teams and 68 players participated in the study. The observation data sheet was made up according to three criteria (when goals were scored in terms of playing time, body part used to score, type of a goal and from where a shot has been taken) and 15 categories. Contrary to what occurs in conventional football, the results of this study show that in the football 7-a-side matches for players with CP a higher number of goals were scored in the first half (58.9%), especially in the first fifteen minutes (30.6%). The majority of goals were scored from inside the penalty area (61.3%). An average of 7.5 goals was scored per match. Most of the goals were scored when the ball was in play (94.9%) and only 5.1% were scored from kicking a stationary ball.
    [Show full text]