Activity Report: Socialization of Msc

USAID SEA PROJECT

ACTIVITY REPORT: SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON THE FISHERIES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (FIP) ACTION FOR SHRIMP FISHERIES IN SORONG SELATAN Sorong, November 24-25, 2020

Prepared by Buguh Tri Hardianto, WWF Indonesia, USAID SEA Partner

DISCLAIMER This report is made possible by the generous support of the American People through the United States Agency for the International Development (USAID) with the close collaboration of the Government of Indonesia (GoI). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of Tetra Tech and do not necessary reflect the view of USAID or the United States Government

(DELETE THIS BLANK PAGE AFTER CREATING PDF. IT’S HERE TO MAKE FACING PAGES AND LEFT/RIGHT PAGE NUMBERS SEQUENCE CORRECTLY IN WORD. BE CAREFUL TO NOT DELETE THIS SECTION BREAK EITHER, UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE GENERATED A FINAL PDF. IT WILL THROW OFF THE LEFT/RIGHT PAGE LAYOUT.)

2 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN FOR SHRIMP USAID.GOV TABLE OF CONTENTS ABBREVIATION & ACRONYMS 4 INTRODUCTION 5 OBJECTIVES 7 SUMMARY OF AGENDA 7 SUMMARY OF PARTICIPANTS 8 RESULT 10 1. MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT 10 2. SCOPING OF ISSUE 16 3. FIP ACTION PLAN 21 KEY OUTPUTS, OUTCOMES AND ACHIEVEMENT 22 RECOMMENDATIONS 23 LESSON LEARNED, BEST PRACTICE APPROACHES TO SHARE (WHERE RELEVANT) 23 ANNEXT 24 ANNEX 1. PHOTOS 24 ANNEX II. ATTENDANCE LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF SHRIMP BMP SOCIALIZATION 26 ANNEX III. FIP ACTION PLAN 32 ANNEX IV. LINK OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT REPORT 44 ANNEX V. LINK OF FIP ACTION PLAN DOCUMENT 44 ANNEX VI. LINK OF SOCIALIZATION DOCUMENTATIONS 44 ANNEX VII. TOR AND APPROVAL 44

Table 1. Summary of MSC Score ...... 6 Table 2. Detailed Schedule of MSC Pre Assessment Result Socialization ...... 8 Table 3. List of Socialization and Discussion Participant ...... 9 Table 4. Socialization Virtual Attendance List...... 10 Table 5. Summary of MSC Pre Assessment Result...... 11 Table 6. Details of Issue Scoping ...... 16 Table 7. Actions Agreed by Stakeholders ...... 21 Table 8. FIP Action Plan for Action 1 ...... 32 Table 9. FIP Action Plan for Action 2 ...... 34 Table 10. FIP Action Plan for Action 3 ...... 36 Table 11. FIP Action Plan for Action 4 ...... 37 Table 12. FIP Action Plan for Action 5 ...... 39 Table 13. FIP Action Plan for Action 6 ...... 41 Table 14. FIP Action Plan for Action 7 ...... 42 Table 15. FIP Action Plan for Action 8 ...... 43

3 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

ABBREVIATION & ACRONYMS

BMP Better Management Practices

ETP Endangered Threatened and Protected

FIP Fisheries Improvement Program

HS Harvest Strategy

HCR Harvest Control Rules

MSY Maximum Sustainable Yield

PI Performance Indicator

PRI Point of recruitment impirement

PSDI Fish Resources Management

PT. IMPD Perusahaan Terbuka Irian Marine Product Development

RBF Risk Based Framework

SEA Project Sustainable Ecosystems Advanced Project

UoA Unit of Assessment

USAID United States Agency for International Development

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 4 INTRODUCTION

The global communities’ concerns on sustainable seafood consumption are increasing over the years. According to Global Scan survey in 2016 (on behalf of Marine Stewardship Council/MSC) with approx. 16,000 seafood consumers from 21 countries involved, 72% of the survey participants preferred the sustainability over the price or product brands and agreed to actively participate on consume seafood from sustainable sources. However, the seafood consumers are still needing to be prepared to adapt with such trend shifting from business as usual into sustainable fisheries. In that context, one of the most applicable ways is to encourage the seafood producers to implement sustainable fishing practices within their business as to provide the sustainable fisheries products in the market.

To ensure the sustainability aspect of the fisheries products, the ecolabels certification plays its role. One of the most respected ecolabels in seafood business is the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC). The MSC standard considers the ecosystem sustainability of capture fisheries not only about labor conditions, working hours, and crew treatment as currently required by Seafish's Responsible Fishing Scheme or Fair-Trade USA. MSC standards also consider all fisheries and ecosystems, fisheries assessed based on sustainability of fishery stocks, impacts on ecosystems including habitats and other species and how effective the management are. Furthermore, MSC implements an in-depth assessment system involving scientific data and information as well as the consultation and review of others that make the scoring system strong and objective. To ensure no fraud occurs along the supply chain scheme, MSC developed a comprehensive standard traceability system from the sea to the consumer’s plate. The system is used to separate seafood products, between the certified with non-certified ones.

In the period from January to July 2020, the MSC Pre-assessment process was carried out for shrimp fisheries using trammel net in South Sorong. This Pre-assessment was conducted to obtain information on the gap between shrimp fishery practices in South Sorong and Marine Stewardship Council standards. Fishermen who are the supply chain of PT. IMPD (Irian Marine Product Development) is the target of this assessment. The MSC pre-assessment was carried out by a third party, namely Petterson Control Union Ltd. Based on the results of this MSC pre-assessment, it is known that the shrimp fishery in South Sorong received a score of 30% in compliance with MSC standards, with the following details:

5 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV Table 1. Summary of MSC Score

Actual Principle Component Performance Indicator Year 1 1.1.1 Stock status 60-79 Outcome 1.1.2 Stock rebuilding --- 1.2.1 Harvest Strategy <60 1 1.2.2 Harvest control rules and tools <60 Management 1.2.3 Information and monitoring <60 1.2.4 Assessment of stock status ≥80 2.1.1 Outcome ≥80 Primary species 2.1.2 Management ≥80 2.1.3 Information <60 2.2.1 Outcome <60 Secondary 2.2.2 Management <60 species 2.2.3 Information <60 2.3.1 Outcome <60 2 ETP species 2.3.2 Management <60 2.3.3 Information <60 2.4.1 Outcome 60-79 Habitats 2.4.2 Management <60 2.4.3 Information <60 2.5.1 Outcome 60-79 Ecosystem 2.5.2 Management <60 2.5.3 Information 60-79 3.1.1 Legal and customary framework 60-79 Governance 3.1.2 Consultation, roles and ≥80 and Policy responsibilities 3.1.3 Long term objectives 60-79 3 3.2.1 Fishery specific objectives 60-79 Fishery specific 3.2.2 Decision making processes <60 management 3.2.3 Compliance and enforcement <60 system 3.2.4 Management performance 60-79 evaluation Total number of PIs equal to or greater than 80 4 Total number of PIs 60-79 8 Total number of PIs less than 60 15 Overall BMT Index 0.30

The Fisheries Improvement Project (FIP) is a scheme agreed upon by all stakeholders to meet MSC standards. Actions taken and agreed upon, focused on changing the red (not pass) and yellow (pass with condition) scores on the performance indicator to green (pass) scores. The key to the success of FIP in

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 6 moving towards MSC certification is the cooperation of all stakeholders involved in implementing the agreed action plans.

Therefore, on 24 - 25 November 2020, the Socialization of MSC Pre Assessment Result and Discussion on The Fisheries Improvement Project (FIP) Action Plan for Shrimp Fisheries in Sorong Selatan was held. This activity is in collaboration with the Directorate of Fish Resources Management (PSDI) of the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries. Meetings are held face-to-face and virtual via Zoom, due to the covid-19 pandemic conditions. In this activity WWF Indonesia presented the results of the MSC Pre Assessment to stakeholders. From the MSC Pre Assessment results, a discussion was carried out in scoping issues to map the problems on the findings of gaps in each performance indicator. That way, it can simplify the process of preparing the FIP Action plan.

OBJECTIVES

1. Presenting the results of the MSC Pre Assessment for shrimp commodities in South Sorong to all stakeholders. 2. Develop a FIP Action Plan for shrimp fisheries in South Sorong with the aim of filling the gap between shrimp fishery practices of PT. IMPD fishermen in the field and MSC standards. With the MSC certificate, it is hoped that it can increase the value of shrimp caught by fishermen in South Sorong.

SUMMARY OF AGENDA

SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON THE FISHERIES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (FIP) ACTION PLAN FOR SHRIMP FIRHERIES IN SORONG SELATAN.

This activity was carried out on November 24-25, 2020 using 2 schemes, namely face-to-face meetings and virtual meetings via zoom. This is due to the Covid-19 pandemic conditions. The socialization activity was held in collaboration between WWF Indonesia and the Directorate of PSDI-KKPThe activity was opened by Mrs. Basweni, representing the Director of Fish Resources Management (PSDI). In her speech, Mrs. Basweni gave directions for mutual cooperation between stakeholders in managing fishery resources. Next was a speech from Mr. Enos Menai who represented the Head of the West Papua Marine and Fisheries Agency. After the speech, it was continued with the presentation of the MSC pre-assessment results and discussion of the preparation of the FIP action plan by Buguh Tri Hardianto (WWF Indonesia). Details of the activity agenda, as follows:

7 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV Table 2. Detailed Schedule of MSC Pre Assessment Result Socialization

Time Activity Tuesday, November 24, 2020 08.00 – 08.15 Opening and Speech by Ibu Basweni representing the Director of Fish Resources Management 08.15 - 08.30 Speech by Bapak Enos Menai represented the Head of the West Papua Marine and Fisheries Agency 08.30 - 09.15 Presentation of the MSC Pre Assessment results for shrimp fisheries in South Sorong 09.15 - 10.00 Discussion of the MSC pre assessment results and the issue scoping document as the basis for the preparation of the FIP action plan in South Sorong 10.00 - 11.00 Break 11.00 - 12.00 Discussion of FIP action plans in action 1 to action 4 12.00 - 13.00 Break 13.00 – 13.00 Discussion of FIP action plans in action 5 to action 8 Wednesday, November 25, 2020 08.00 - 08.30 Review of the first day's discussion 08.30 - 09.00 Presentations of Benchmark Monitoring and Tools 09.00 - 10.00 Discussion of follow-up steps from the preparation of the FIP Action Plan 10.00 – 10.15 Closing by Yaya Hudaya representing the PDSI Director

SUMMARY OF PARTICIPANTS

Given that capture fisheries is a sector that has common properties criteria, stakeholder involvement is key in the preparation of the FIP Action Plan. FIP Action plan must be agreed upon by all stakeholders, therefore in the discussion which was held on November 24-25 this involved the stakeholders. In this activity there were 39 participants consisting of 11 female participants and 28 male participants. Detailed participant of this discussion that join with face-to-face meeting is provided in Table 3 below.

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 8 Table 3. List of Socialization and Discussion Participant

No Name Institutions 1 Endang Roesbandi PT. IMPD 2 Harsono PT. Piala Seafood 3 Yusuf Momot Initiation Team Sorong Selatan MPA 4 Kris Kikire POKMASWAS Sorsel 5 Faridz Rizal Fachri WWF Indonesia 6 Enos S. Menai DKP Papua Barat 7 Ahmad Fahrizal Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong 8 Hedwin. S PSDKP Sorong 9 Terianus Wugaje Initiation Team Sorong Selatan MPA 10 Elimelek Dinas Perikanan Sorong Selatan 11 M. Hanifudin Loka PSPL Sorong 12 Aomri WWF Indonesia 13 Tri Antoro HPPI 14 Endroyono HPPI 15 Inayah WWF Indonesia 16 Vinsensius WWF Indonesia 17 Selia Hermawati WWF Indonesia 18 La Ode Hasanuddin WWF Indonesia 19 Muis WWF Indonesia 20 Lambert Apelabi WWF Indonesia 21 Buguh Tri Hardianto WWF Indonesia 22 Hendro Sutjahyo PT. IMPD 23 Metamagfirul PT. IMPD

This activity is carried out with 2 schemes, wich is face-to-face and online meetings. This is done to accommodate participants who have not been able to come to Sorong because of the Covid-19 pandemic conditions. The list of attendance of the socialization that join with zoom is provided in table 4 below:

9 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

Table 4. Socialization Virtual Attendance List

No Name Institution 1 Jean Voin Pattikawa, S.Pi BPPP Satminkal Ambon 2 Yaya Hudaya Dit PSDI 3 Balai Pelatihan Dan Penyuluhan Naema Situmorang, S.Pi Perikanan Ambon 4 Fanny FC Siamatauw,S.Pi, MP Universitas Papua 5 Maskur wwf 6 Siti Kamarijah Dit. PSDI 7 Purwanto USAID SEA Project 8 Jean Voin Pattikawa, S.Pi BPPP Satminkal Ambon 9 Siti Yasmina Enita WWF-Indonesia 10 Achmad Mustofa Yayasan WWF ID 11 Abdul Manaf Keliandan BPPP Ambon 12 arhandy arfah bppp ambon 13 Andina Ramadhani Putri Pane Balai Riset Perikanan Laut 14 Asnuri BPPP AMBON (Kab. Sorong) 15 Oktofianus S koibur S. Pi Dinas perikanan Sorong 16 Muhammad Ali, S.Pi Dinas perikanan Sorong

RESULT

1. MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT The MSC Pre Assessment was conducted to determine the gap between shrimp fishery practices in South Sorong and the MSC standard. From the MSC Pre Assessment results, shrimp fisheries in South Sorong received a score of 30% of compliance with standards. There are 28 performance indicators (PI) assessed in the MSC pre-assessment. From the 28 PIs, 15 PIs got red scores (Not pass), 8 PIs got yellow scores (passed with conditions), and 4 PIs got Green scores (passed). The summary of the assessment for each indicator can be seen in the table below:

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 10 Table 5. Summary of MSC Pre Assessment Result

Performance Indicator Draft scoring range Data deficient?

1.1.1 – Stock status 60-79 Yes

Rationale or key points

Scored using the RBF – see Appendix 2.3. Consequence Analysis is likely to score 60, and Productivity Susceptibility Analysis is likely to score more than 80, giving an overall RBF score of 60-79.

1.1.2 – Stock rebuilding NA -

Rationale or key points

Not scored when using RBF for 1.1.1

1.2.1 – Harvest Strategy <60 No

Rationale or key points

There is no basis for arguing that the harvest strategy for this fishery will be able to play a role in protecting the stock. Given that the stock has not been defined in FMA715 as of yet, the harvest strategy cannot be expected to work.

1.2.2 – Harvest control rules <60 No and tools

Rationale or key points

There are no HCRs in place or available in this fishery. SG60 is not met.

1.2.3 – Information and <60 No monitoring

Rationale or key points

Current monitoring is insufficient to support a harvest strategy.

1.2.4 – Assessment of stock NA - status

Rationale or key points

Not scored if the RBF is used for 1.1.1

11 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV 2.1.1 – Primary Outcome ≥80 n/a

Rationale or key points

No primary species have been identified for the fishery. SG100 is applied for scoring issues a-b, therefore the PI scores >80.

2.1.2 – Primary Management ≥80 n/a

Rationale or key points

No primary species have been identified for the fishery. SG100 is applied for scoring issues a-b, while scoring issues c-d are not applicable, therefore the PI scores >80.

2.1.3 – Primary Information <60 n/a

Rationale or key points

Neither qualitative nor quantitative data exists on the stock status of any of the bycatch species – so stock status cannot be determined, therefore determining the impact against stock status is also not possible. For this reason, SG60 is not met.

2.2.1 – Secondary Outcome <60 Yes

Rationale or key points

To meet SG60, MSC FCR v2.01 requires that main secondary species are likely (>70% probability) to be above biologically based limits. No species-specific stock assessments or risk assessments are available, moderate to very high vulnerability classifications are applied for a number of the reported bycatch species, and MMAF classifies major taxonomic groups as fully- or over-exploited for the fishery management area. It is therefore not possible to state with >70% probability that main secondary species are above biologically based limits. No measures are in place to ensure that the UoA does not hinder recovery and rebuilding of the main secondary species.

2.2.2 – Secondary <60 Yes Management

Rationale or key points

There are no measures in place to explicitly manage impacts on any of the identified secondary species. Available information is insufficient to demonstrate that existing management measures have an indirect impact on the components. SG60 is not met for scoring issues a-e, therefore the PI scores <60.

2.2.3 – Secondary Information <60 Yes

Rationale or key points

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 12 While some quantitative information on bycatch composition does exist, there are discrepancies between sources, and insufficient information to determine the adequacy of methods in line with requirements under SA3.6.3.2. In applying the Risk-Based Framework, qualitative information is insufficient to estimate productivity and susceptibility attributes for main secondary species. Information is insufficient to detect any change in risk level to main secondary species due to measures implemented by the UoA. SG60 is not met for scoring issues a-c, therefore the PI scores <60.

2.3.1 – ETP Outcome <60 Yes

Rationale or key points

National regulations are in place for several ETP species that define either full protection or exploitation limits. No quantitative or qualitative information is available on ETP catch volume, effects of the UoA on ETP species, or on level of monitoring, control and surveillance. No evidence is available that the fishery has adopted measures to address catch or mortality of ETP species. There is some evidence that ETP violations have been processed within the fishery, though documentation is limited. Few population surveys have been conducted, and status of ETP species (e.g., cetaceans, turtles, sharks) remains unclear. To meet SG60 the MSC FCR v2.01 requires that effects of the UoA are known and “likely” (>70% probability) to be within limits. Given the available information available, it is not possible to state with at least 70% probability that ETP catches are within the limits specified by national regulations. SG60 is not met for 2.3.1.a., therefore the PI scores <60.

2.3.2 – ETP Management <60 Yes

Rationale or key points

There is insufficient information available to demonstrate that the UoA has measures in place to minimise mortality of ETP species. SG60 is not met for scoring issues a-e, therefore the PI scores <60.

2.3.3 – ETP Information <60 Yes

Rationale or key points

Qualitative information is insufficient to assess susceptibility attributes for those ETP species identified for the UoA. Available information is insufficient to assess impacts of the UoA on ETP species. SG60 is not met for scoring issues a-b, therefore the PI scores <60.

2.4.1 – Habitats Outcome 60 – 79 Yes

Rationale or key points

Given the limited footprint of the UoA, it is “unlikely” (<40% probability) to cause serious or irreversible harm to encountered habitats and VME habitats. However, no quantitative or qualitative information is available on the UoA’s habitat impacts, and there are some indications that destructive fishing practices may occur in the vicinity. SG60 is met for scoring issues a-b, but SG80 is not met, therefore the PI scores 60-79.

13 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV 2.4.2 – Habitats Management <60 Yes

Rationale or key points

Insufficient information is available to demonstrate that any monitoring of habitat outcomes is conducted, or that any measures are in place to achieve habitat outcomes. No qualitative evidence is available to indicate that the UOA complies with its management requirements to protect VMEs. SG60 is not met for scoring issues a-d, therefore the PI scores <60.

2.4.3 – Habitats Information <60 Yes

Rationale or key points

MSC FCR v2.01 PF 7.3.1 stipulates that “each habitat in the full area managed by the governance body(s) responsible for fisheries management in the area(s) where the UoA operates” must be considered. Available information is insufficient to estimate the types and distribution of habitats within fishery management area WPP716. The available qualitative information is insufficient to estimate the consequence and spatial attributes of the main habitats. SG60 is not met for scoring issues a-b, therefore the PI scores <60.

2.5.1 – Ecosystems Outcome 60 – 79 Yes

Rationale or key points

Given the limited footprint and operational intensity of the UoA, it is unlikely (<40% probability) that the UoA will disrupt key elements of the ecosystem, but the available information is insufficient to state that the UoA is highly unlikely (<30% probability) to cause serious or irreversible harm. SG60 is met and the PI scores 60-79.

2.5.2 – Ecosystems <60 Yes Management

Rationale or key points

There is insufficient information available to demonstrate that the UoA has measures in place that consider the potential impacts of the UoA on key elements of the ecosystem. SG60 is not met for scoring issues a-c, therefore the PI scores <60.

2.5.3 – Ecosystems 60 – 79 Yes Information

Rationale or key points

The key elements of the ecosystem are broadly understood, and main functions have been studied and modelled, including tropic structure and ecological connectivity. Main impacts of the UoA can be inferred from existing information and research conducted in other locations, however the nature and intensity of these impacts on ecosystem elements and functions have not been investigated in detail for the UoA. SG60 is met for scoring issues a- b, but SG80 is not met for scoring issues a-e, therefore the PI scores 60-79.

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 14 3.1.1 – Legal and customary 60 – 79 No framework

Rationale or key points

SG60 is met, since there is a national legal system and a framework of cooperation with other parties, where necessary, to deliver management outcomes consistent with MSC Principles 1 and 2. Through the autonomy law, the national management system can be considered to be organised, but the example stated above highlights that this is organised framework cannot always be considered to be effective. For this reason, SG80 is not met

3.1.2 – Consultation, roles ≥80 No and responsibilities

Rationale or key points

SG 60 is exceeded and 80 is met; organization and management process have been identified. Functions, roles and responsibilities are explicitly defined and well understood for main key areas of responsibility and interaction. However, it cannot be said that all parties in management (and their role) is understood by every party involved in the fishery (namely fishermen) SG 100 not met.

3.1.3 – Long term objectives 60 – 79 No

Rationale or key points

SG60 is met but SG80 is not fully met as the long-term objectives guiding decision-making consistent with the MSC Fisheries Standard and the precautionary approach has been explicitly mentioned in general (especially for pelagic fisheries and reef fisheries) but it was not clearly mention for Shrimp fisheries.

3.2.1 – Fishery specific 60 – 79 No objectives

Rationale or key points

SG 60 is met as there is general objective within the fishery specific management and specific for pelagic fisheries and coral fisheries, however, there is no explicit long term on wild catch shrimp fisheries (penaeid shrimp) available.

3.2.2 – Decision making <60 No processes

Rationale or key points

The fact that policies and regulations were not updated or modified in response to the knowledge that stocks have been overexploited leads the team to believe that SG 60 cannot be met, as this serious issue has not been responded to. The team has adopted the precautionary score of <60 here as the outcomes of a preassessment should be precautionary rather than optimistic. There are established decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve the fishery-specific objectives

15 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV 3.2.3 – Compliance and <60 No enforcement

Rationale or key points

SG 60 is not met, there is no evidence that a system has been implemented for those who deal with non-compliance (as stated in regulation/policy) for small scale fisheries.

3.2.4 – Management 60 – 79 No performance evaluation

Rationale or key points

SG 60 is met, internal review has been implemented and perform by MMAF, but there is no evidence provided external review has been conducted, so SG 80 is not met

2. SCOPING OF ISSUE The Fisheries Improvement Project will focus on improving the status of PIs that still score Red and Yellow. This scoping of issue is carried out to map the problem so that it makes it easier for stakeholders to agree on actions to improve it. Given that each PI is related to each other, it is possible to improve several PIs with the same 1 action. Details of issue scoping can be seen in the following table:

Table 6. Details of Issue Scoping

PI The pre-assessment findings Problem 1.1.1 In the Ministerial Decree No. 50 of 2017, the Problem 2 = There are no agreed reference Stock status status of banana shrimp is still categorized as point for evaluating whether the stock of the the penaeid shrimp group, there is no target species are in a health condition. specific information for banana shrimp. There is a target reference point for utilization from the results of the SPR study, which is 40% SPR, however there is no biological reference point of banana shrimp in the UoA that has been agreed. It has been suggested that the reference point for the utilization limit is 20% SPR, whereas at this time the results of the study of banana shrimp utilization in UoA are above 20% SPR.. 1.2.1 There is no harvest strategy that has Problem 4: There is no management strategy Harvest objectives or reference points for a specific for target species that has objectives based on Strategy target species. agreed reference points. The current strategy is TAC (total allowable catch) in KEPMEN KP 50 2017 which still

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 16 categorizes penaeid shrimp, not specific for banana shrimp. 1.2.2 TAC (total allowable catch) is still Problem 4: There is no management strategy Harvest categorized as penaeid shrimp, not for target species that has objectives based on control rules specifically for banana shrimp agreed reference points. and tools 1.2.3 The available information and data are Problem 1: There is no information regarding Information insufficient to determine the stock structure, the biology of the species that can be used as and geographic area of the stock, stock life cycle, an option for management approaches. monitoring and shrimp catch characteristics to support the existence of specific fisheries management for banana shrimp species in South Sorong waters. 2.1.3 Although no primary species are captured, Problem 5 = There is no sustainable data Primary ongoing data collection on bycatch is collection scheme for trammel net catches, Information required. and there is no specific stock status information on trammel net catch species. 2.2.1 12 main secondary species consist of: Problem 1: There is no information regarding Secondary 1. Sharpnose hammer croaker the biology of the species that can be used as Outcome 2. Chub mackerals an option for management approaches. 3. Baramundi 4. Sagor catfish 5. Whitecheek shark 6. Croakers 7. Requiem sharks 8. Giant catfish 9. Sand shrimp 10. Striped catfish 11. Rabbitfish 12. Tonguefish

There is no specific stock status for bycatch, except for crabs. Several types of bycatch are categorized as demersal fish in KEPMEN KP no. 50 of 2017, with fully exploited status.

From RBF result: 8 Species defined as low risk (Chub mackerals, Baramundi, Sagor catfish, Croakers, Sand shrimp, striped catfish, Rabbitfish, Tonguefish), 1 species was determined as moderate risk (giant catfish), and 3 species identified as high risk (Sharpnose hammer croaker, Whitecheek shark, requiem sharks) 2.2.2 There is no information regarding specific Secondary management measures for the 12 main Management secondary species.

17 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV Problem 6 = There is no on-board monitoring There is no information yet whether scheme that can record released catch, gosht KEPMEN KP No.50 2017 has a positive fishing and shark finning. impact on the field.

There is not enough information to evaluate whether management measures related to shark finning are implemented in the field 2.2.3 There is sufficient information both Problem 5 = There is no sustainable data Secondary qualitatively and quantitatively to measure collection scheme for trammel net catches, Information the impact of the UoA on secondary species and there is no specific stock status using RBF (PSA). information on trammel net catch species.

There is insufficient information to identify whether management measures for secondary species are being properly implemented. 2.3.1 ETP there is anecdotal information that there is Problem 6 = There is no on-board monitoring Outcome an interaction between trammel net and ETP scheme that can record released catch, gosht species such as turtles, saw sharks, and fishing and shark finning. dolphins (Ratna et al 2019)

There is no informai report on the interaction data between the UoA and the ETP species.

2.3.2 ETP There is not enough information to show Problem 6 = There is no evidence or data Management that the implementation of ETP species collection to show that the existing regulations management is being reviewed in the field. regarding ETP have succeeded in minimizing the impact of the UoA on ETP Species. 2.3.3 ETP There is not enough information available to Problem 6 = There is no on-board monitoring Information support ETP regulations and measure the scheme that can record dumped catch, gosht impact of the UoA on ETP. fishing and shark finning. 2.4.1 Habitats There is no information regarding the impact Problem 7 = It is not yet known with certainty Outcome of the UoA on habitat. the impact of IPA on habitat. However, with the character of small-scale fisheries and passive fishing gear, it is likely that the UoA will not have a serious or irreparable impact on the habitat. 2.4.2 Habitats There are no management measures to Problem 7 = It is not yet known with certainty Management minimize the impact of the UoA on Habitat the impact of IPA on habitat. there are no which are regularly monitored.. specific habitat management measures for this type of gear (eg net size limits, fishing effort limits, temporal / spatial cover, etc.) if needed. 2.4.3 Habitats There is no information regarding habitat in Problem 7 = It is not yet known with certainty Information the UoA, especially for sand and mud the impact of IPA on habitat. habitats.

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 18 No monitoring has been conducted to measure the impact of UoA on habitat on a regular basis. 2.5.1 the nature of the fisheries present in the Problem 5 = There is no sustainable data Ecosystems UoA is small scale and there is no possibility collection scheme for trammel net catches, Outcome that the trammel could have a destructive or and there is no specific stock status irreversible impact on key elements of the information on trammel net catch species. ecosystem. However, there is no specific management yet to minimize the impact of the UoA on the ecosystem. There is no study that can prove the level of impact of the UoA on the ecosystem. 2.5.2 The information available is insufficient to Problem 5 = There is no sustainable data Ecosystems suggest that the UoA has measures that collection scheme for trammel net catches, Management consider the potential impact of the UoA on and there is no specific stock status key elements of the ecosystem. information on trammel net catch species. 2.5.3 There is sufficient knowledge of general Problem 5 = There is no sustainable data Ecosystems ecosystems to identify key elements, along collection scheme for trammel net catches, Information with possible fisheries impacts, but these and there is no specific stock status ecosystems have not been investigated in information on trammel net catch species. detail. Given the nature of small-scale fisheries and the amount of qualitative information for the fishery component, the ecosystem consequences of fishing can be inferred; however, there is no continuous monitoring of the fishery component to detect increased levels of risk. 3.1.1 Legal Through the autonomy law (UU23), the Problem 8 = Several fisheries-related and national management system can be regulations have not been implemented customary considered organized, but there is a finding effectively. because the district government framework that this organized framework cannot always does not have the authority to enforce these be considered effective. regulations. For example, in KEPMEN KP No. 50 of 2017 states that the shrimp commodity is fully exploited. However, there is no translation of TAC at the district level. In addition, there have not been any anticipatory steps taken to address the fully exploited status. 3.1.3 Long There are long-term goals for WPP715 Problem 3: Shrimp species are not yet a term which are contained in RPP WPP715 priority issue in the RPP WPP 715 objectives (KEPMEN KP no.82 / 2016), however, there is no specific long-term goal for shrimp commodity.

3.2.1 Fishery In KEPMEN KP no 50 of 2017 there are Problem 4: There is no management strategy specific points about the amount of catch allowed. for target species that have objectivity based objectives This can be considered as a reference point. on the agreed reference points.

19 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV However, there is no specific reference point for banana shrimp, considering that banana shrimp is included in the broad category of penaeid shrimp.

3.2.2 Decision There has been no update from the latest Problem 4 = There are no responsive steps making status in WPP 715. So it cannot prove that that use a precautionary approach in processes there are responsive steps from the addressing the issue of resource stock utilization status in 2017. degradation. Will be included in the process of using shrimp strategy in UoA and several other actions. 3.2.3 Although there is a POKMASWAS as an Problem 8 = Several fisheries regulations have Compliance extension of the Fisheries Supervisory Board not been implemented effectivelybecause the and (PSDKP) that can report findings of violations district government does not have the enforcement in the field to PSDKP, there is no evidence of authority to enforce these regulations. sanctions being given to non-compliant fishermen. For example: based on observations through interviews in 2018 in 3 districts (Teminabuan / Konda / Inanwatan), captured ETP species such as turtles, sharks, rays, are mostly eaten and sold (Selvy tebay et al., 2018), however, during the stakeholder meeting (PA Process), it was found that no sanctions were imposed on fisheries in South Sorong Regency when a fisherman caught and kept the ETP species. 3.2.4 Stock assessments are reviewed internally by Problem 4: There is no harvest strategy on Management the MMAF Committee for stock target species that has objectives based on an performance assessments; however, this is not specific to agreed reference point. evaluation the banana shrimp fishery (but rather all This indicator can be included in the harvest shrimp species across FMA). In addition, strategy review scheme there is no official document from the shrimp stock assessment process in WPP715 that can be accessed by the auditor.

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 20 3. FIP ACTION PLAN After the forum has agreed on priority issues in fisheries improvement, discussions will be held on the preparation of the FIP Action plan. There were 8 actions agreed by stakeholders which later became the Fiheries Improvement Project. These 8 actions can be seen in the following table:

Table 7. Actions Agreed by Stakeholders

Action Action name Target Performance Indicator number (MSC) Action 1 Conduct studies related Availability of information such as; Stock PI 1.2.3 (SG <60) to the biology of structure, geographic area of stock, life PI 2.2.1 (SG <60) trammel net catch at the cycle, and characteristics of shrimp UoA catching can be used as management approach options. Action 2 Establish a specific Availability of reference points for PI 1.1.1 (SG <60) utilization reference utilization to determine the level of point for Banana Shrimp utilization and to ascertain how much in the UoA utilization is above PRI / MSY Action 3 Inserting a shrimp The availability of RPP WPP 715 which PI 3.1.3 (SG 60-79) species become a makes shrimp fishery one of the priority priority issue in the RPP issues WPP 715 Action 4 Making a harvest The availability of harvest strategies to PI 1.2.1 (SG <60) strategy to white shrimp ensure sustainable use of shrimp using PI 1.2.2 (SG <60) in UoA trammel net (above PRI / MSY) PI 3.2.1 (SG 60-79) PI 3.2.4 (SG 60-79) PI 3.2.2 (SG <60)

Action 5 Collect bycatch data The availability of bycatch data from the PI 2.1.3 (SG <60) from the trammel net trammel net to monitor the impact of PI 2.2.3 (SG <60) fishery the trammel net on bycatch. If it is PI 2.5.1 (SG 60-79) known that there are damaging or PI 2.5.2 (SG 60-79) irreversible impacts, it can take PI 2.5.3 (SG 60-79) management measures to improve the health of the bycatch species again. Action 5 link with action 2 Action 6 conducting data Availability of data and information PI 2.2.2 (SG 60-79) collection on the board related to ETP and gosht net PI 2.3.1 (SG 60-79) (Observer on board) interactions. Can be used as a basis for PI 2.3.2 (SG 60-79) managing the impact of the trammel net PI 2.3.3 (SG 60-79) on ETP if necessary. Action 7 Conduct an assessment Availability of periodic results of trammel PI 2.4.1 (SG 60-79) of the impact of trammel net impact studies on habitat. To PI 2.4.2 (SG <60) net on habitat monitor impacts and can form the basis PI 2.4.3 (SG <60) for making habitat management when needed. Action 8 Law enforcement of The existing regulations at the central PI 3.1.1 (SG 60-79) existing regulations and regional levels related to fisheries PI 3.2.3 (SG <60) management in the UoA are properly implemented and monitored

21 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV This FIP Action Plan still needs to be developed by involving more stakeholders to divide roles and responsibilities in its implementation. In addition, stakeholder agreement is also needed in the funding sources for the FIP. In Details all the FIP Action Plan available in annex II.

KEY OUTPUTS, OUTCOMES AND ACHIEVEMENT

1. The socialization of the MSC Pre Assessment results was held on 24-25 November 2020. This activity is in collaboration with the PSDI-KKP Directorate in its implementation. There were 23 activity participants who attended face-to-face meetings and 16 participants who participated in online (Zoom Meeting). Participants consisted of several agencies, among others: − PT. Irian Marine Product Development (PT. IMPD) − PT. Piala Seafood − Initiation Team Sorong Selatan MPA (Tim Inisiasi KKPD Sorong Selatan) − Pokmaswas Sorong Selatan (Kelompok Masyarakat Pengawas) − Papua Barat Marine and Fisheries Agency (Dinas Kelautan dan Perikanan Papua Barat) − Sorong Selatan Fisheries Agency (Dinas Perikanan Sorong Selatan) − PSDKP Sorong (Pengawas Sumber Daya Kelautan dan Perikanan) − Loka PSPL Sorong (Loka Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Pesisir dan Laut) − Shrimp Catching Entrepreneurs Association, HPPI (Himpunan Pengusaha Penangkap Udang Indonesia) − BPPP (Balai Pelatihan dan Penyuluhan Perikanan) Satminkal Ambon − Direktorat PSDI-KKP (Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Ikan-Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan) − USAID SEA Project − BRPL (Marine Fisheries Research Institute/Balai Riset Perikanan Laut) − Fisheries Axtention (Penyuluh Perikanan) − WWF Indonesia

2. The given inputs from stakeholders in discussion session is as follows: − A series of follow-up meetings is needed to finalize the FIP action plan involving all stakeholders − Encouraging a clear product traceability scheme from PT. IMPD. So that future FIP implementation assistance can focus on target fishermen. − Immediately encourage the existence of a POKJA that specifically monitors the implementation of FIP shrimp in South Sorong. − Coordinating with the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries to get direction in the follow- up of shrimp FIP in South Sorong.

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 22 RECOMMENDATIONS

The FIP action plan needs to be discussed regarding the source of funding in its future implementation once the USAID SEA Project is finished and. The the FIP Action Plan document can be accessed at: https://bit.ly/FIP_Action_Plan_Sorsel

LESSON LEARNED, BEST PRACTICE APPROACHES TO SHARE (WHERE RELEVANT)

With the current conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic, it is quite difficult for the meeting process. Because it is necessary to hold meetings with face-to-face and virtual schemes simultaneously. There are challenges in conducting meetings like thisInternet connection is suddenly down and technical problems from sound are problems in meetings. Tools are needed to facilitate hybrid meetings like this. So that the meeting can run more smoothly, both for face-to-face meeting participants and those who attend virtually.

23 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV ANNEXT

ANNEX 1. PHOTOS

Photo 1. Discussion about MSC Pre Assessment Result with PT IMPD

USAID.GOV SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN | 24

Photo 2. The Process of Socialization of MSC Pre Assessment Result and Discussion on the FIP Action Plan

25 | GENETIC AND MORPHOMETRIC STUDY OF RED SNAPPER AND GROUPER IN FMA 715 USAID.GOV ANNEX II. ATTENDANCE LIST OF PARTICIPANTS OF SHRIMP BMP SOCIALIZATION

Attendance list of Socialization day 1 (Tuesday, 24 November 2020)

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 26

27 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

ID Nama Instansi Jabatan Alamat Email Nomor Telephone 1 Jean Voin Pattikawa, S.PiBPPP Satminkal AmbonPPB Kota Sorong [email protected] 2 Yaya Hudaya Dit PSDI P3T [email protected] 081310660619 3 Naema Situmorang, S.PiBalai Pelatihan Dan PenyuluhanPenyuluh Perikanan Perikanan Ambon [email protected] 4 Fanny FC Siamatauw,S.Pi,Universitas MP Papua Ketua Jurusan [email protected] Fakultas Perikanan dan081213679120 Ilmu Kelautan 5 Maskur wwf Sea project leader [email protected] 08114706436 6 Siti Kamarijah Dit. PSDI P3T Madya [email protected] 7 Purwanto USAID SEA Project Senior Fisheries [email protected]+628111712750 8 Jean Voin Pattikawa, S.PiBPPP Satminkal AmbonPenyuluh Perikanan [email protected] (PPB) Kota Sorong 082311502913 9 Siti Yasmina Enita WWF-Indonesia Seafood Market [email protected] 081327732944 10 Achmad Mustofa Yayasan WWF ID Capture Fisheries [email protected] 081225385560 11 Abdul Manaf KeliandanBPPP Ambon Penyuluh Perikanan [email protected] 081344796079 12 arhandy arfah bppp ambon penyuluh perikanan [email protected] 13 Andina Ramadhani PutriBalai Pane Riset Perikanan LautPeneliti Muda [email protected]

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 28

Attendance list of Socialization day 2 (Wednesday, 25 November 2020)

29 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 30

ID Nama Instansi Jabatan Alamat Email Nomor Telephone 1 Andina Ramadhani PutriBalai Pane Riset Perikanan Laut,Peneliti KKP [email protected] 2 Jean Voin Pattikawa, S.PiBPPP Satminkal AmbonPenyuluh Perikanan [email protected] 3 Yaya Hudaya Dit PSDI P3T Muda [email protected] 081310660619 4 Ahmad Fahrizal, S.Pi., M.SiUniversitas MuhammadiyahDekan Sorong Fakultas [email protected] 5 Naema Situmorang,S.PiBalai Pelatihan Dan PenyuluhanPenyuluh Perikanan Perikanan Ambon [email protected] 6 Muhammad Ali, S.Pi DINAS PERIKANAN KAB.Penyuluh SORONG Perikanan SELATAN Bantuhawa. [email protected] 7 Fanny FC Simatauw, S.Pi,Universitas MP Papua Ketua Jurusan [email protected] Fakultas Perikanan dan081213679120 ilmu kelautan Universitas Papua 8 Asnuri BPPP AMBON (Kab. Sorong)Penyuluh Perikanan [email protected] 9 Oktofianus S koibur S. PiDinas perikanan kabupatenPenyuluh sorong perikanan [email protected] 10 Faridz Rizal Fachri WWF Indonesia Capture Fisheries [email protected] 082231610171 11 Achmad Mustofa Yayasan WWF IndonesiaCapture Fisheries [email protected] 081225385560 12 Maskur Tamanyira WWF - ID SEA Project Leader [email protected] 08114706436 13 Siti Yasmina Enita WWF Indonesia Seafood Market [email protected] Specialist 081327732944 14 Ahmad Fahrizal, S.Pi., M.Si.Universitas MuhammadiyahDekan Sorong Fakultas [email protected]

31 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

ANNEX III. FIP ACTION PLAN Table 8. FIP Action Plan for Action 1

Action ID Action 1 Action Name Conduct studies related to the biology of trammel net catch at the UoA Availability of information such as; Stock structure, geographic area of stock, life cycle, and Action Target characteristics of shrimp catching can be used as management approach options. PI 1.2.3 (SG <60) Performance PI 2.2.1 (SG <60) Indicator

Time Year 1 expectations Responsible Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of Sub-Action - Action - Time completion completion coordinator A1.1 KOMNAS UNIPA 1 Month Year 1-Q1 Approved methods for Stakeholder KAJISKAN POLTEK Sorong conducting research on meetings, BRPL UMS species level and especially in SDI-DJPT population structure of the academic DKP Papua Barat trammel net species in field or DKP Sorong the UoA researchers, Selatan to agree on Penyuluh Perikanan methods and WWF-Indonesia data needs Loka PSPL Sorong and to LC EAFM WPP 715 establish data collection protocols in conducting research on species level and population structure of trammel net species in the UoA

A1.2 Conduct BRPL PT. IMPD 2 Month Year 1- Q1 Availability of the results research BRPL of biological studies of related to the SDI-DJPT Note: trammel net catch biology of KOMNASKAJISKAN Probably species trammel net UNIPA more than catch POLTEK Sorong 2 months species UMS Loka PSPL Sorong

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 32

A1.3 BRPL PT. IMPD 1 Month Year 1- Q1 Availability of Disseminate BRPL Dissemination activity research SDI-DJPT reports results KOMNASKAJISKAN related to the UNIPA biology of POLTEK Sorong trammel net UMS catch Loka PSPL Sorong species. A1.4 Making BRPL SDI-DJPT 1 Bulan Th1 – Q2 The availability of scientific UNIPA DKP Papua Barat scientific publications / publications Poltek DKP Sorong reports related to related to Sorong Selatan species level and biological UMS Penyuluh Perikanan population structure of research of WWF-Indonesia trammel net catch trammel net Pelabuhan species. catch Perikanan Sorong species PT. IMPD Loka PSPL Sorong

33 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

Table 9. FIP Action Plan for Action 2

Action ID Aksi 2 Action Name Establish a specific reference point for Banana Shrimp in the UoA Availability of reference points to determine the level of utilization and ensure how much Action Target utilization is above PRI / MSY Performance PI 1.1.1 (SG <60) Indicator Time Year 4 expectations Responsible Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of completion Sub-Action - Action - Time completion coordinator A2.1 KOMNAS UNIPA 2 Month Year 1 – Q2 Approved methods for Stakeholder KAJISKAN POLTEK Sorong assessing stock status, meetings, BRPL UMS as well as reference especially in SDI-DJPT points for target species academics or DKP Papua Barat (MSY / MEY) researchers, DKP Sorong are to agree Selatan on data Penyuluh Perikanan requirements WWF-Indonesia and methods Loka PSPL Sorong and to establish data collection protocols in conducting research on stock status studies, as well as reference points. A2.2 Penyuluh PT. IMPD 2 Month Year 1 – Q3 Report on the Socializing e- Perikanan BRPL socialization of logbook logbook POKJA SDI-DJPT recording activities to recording to KOMNASKAJISKA shrimp fishermen / shrimp N enumerators at the UoA. fishermen / Pelabuhan enumerators Perikanan Sorong at UoA. UNIPA POLTEK Sorong UMS Loka PSPL Sorong

A2.3 Testing Nelayan Penyuluh Perikanan 1 Year Year 2 – Q3 The availability of of logbook Enumerator PT. IMPD logbook data from recording by BRPL

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 34 shrimp SDI-DJPT fishermen's catch in 1 fishermen / KOMNASKAJISKA shrimp fishing cycle enumerators N at UoA. Pelabuhan Perikanan Sorong UNIPA POLTEK Sorong UMS Loka PSPL Sorong

A.2.4 Annual KOMNAS UNIPA 1 Month Conducted Availability of activity meeting of KAJISKAN POLTEK Sorong every year reports on the evaluation logbook data BRPL UMS of trammel net catch evaluation SDI-DJPT logbook data at the UoA DKP Papua Barat DKP Sorong Selatan Penyuluh Perikanan WWF-Indonesia Loka PSPL Sorong Nelayan

A2.5 Conduct BRPL SDI-DJPT 6 Month Year 4 – Q3 Availability of stock status stock status UNIPA DKP Papua Barat assessment results and studies and Poltek DKP Sorong reference points for the reference Sorong Selatan target species. points for UMS Penyuluh Perikanan target WWF-Indonesia species. Pelabuhan Perikanan Sorong PT. IMPD Loka PSPL Sorong

A2.6 BRPL SDI-DJPT 1 Month Year 2 – Q3 The availability of a Disseminate UNIPA DKP Papua Barat dissemination report of the results of Poltek DKP Sorong the study on banana the study on Sorong Selatan shrimp stock assessment banana UMS Penyuluh Perikanan results at the UoA shrimp stock WWF-Indonesia estimation at Pelabuhan UoA Perikanan Sorong PT. IMPD Loka PSPL Sorong

A2.7 Making BRPL SDI-DJPT 2 Month Year 4 – Q3 Availability of scientific scientific UNIPA DKP Papua Barat publications based on the publications Poltek DKP Sorong stock status studies based on the Sorong Selatan results and reference results of UMS Penyuluh Perikanan points for the target stock status WWF-Indonesia species

35 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

studies and Pelabuhan reference Perikanan Sorong points of PT. IMPD target Loka PSPL Sorong species

Table 10. FIP Action Plan for Action 3

Action ID Action 3 Action Name Inserting a shrimp species become a priority issue in the RPP WPP 715 Action The availability of RPP WPP 715 which makes shrimp fishery one of the priority issues Target Performance PI 3.1.3 (SG 60-79) Indicator Time Year 2 expectations Responsible Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of completion Sub-Action - Action - Time completion coordinator A3.1 SDI-DJPT UNIPA 1 Month Year 2 – Q3 Availability of RPP WPP Entering the POLTEK Sorong 715 which has included shrimp UMS shrimp fisheries as a fishery, KOMNAS priority issue and has especially in KAJISKAN objectives for its South BRPL management. Sorong be a DKP Papua Barat priority issue DKP Sorong Selatan at the Penyuluh Perikanan meeting WWF-Indonesia WPP review Loka PSPL Sorong RPP 715

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 36

Table 11. FIP Action Plan for Action 4

Action ID Action 4 Action Name Creating a white shrimp harvest strategy at UoA Availability of harvest strategies to ensure sustainable shrimp fishing using trammel net (above Action Target PRI / MSY) PI 1.2.1 (SG <60) PI 1.2.2 (SG <60) Performance PI 3.2.1 (SG 60-79) Indicator PI 3.2.4 (SG 60-79) PI 3.2.2 (SG <60) Time Year 5 expectations Responsible Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of completion Sub-Action - Action - Time completion coordinator A4.1 A series SDI-DJPT UNIPA 3 Month Year 4 – Q4 Availability of reference of KOMNAS POLTEK Sorong points for shrimp in the stakeholder KAJISKAN UMS UoA that have been meetings to BRPL DKP Papua Barat agreed upon by agree on a DKP Sorong stakeholders. reference Selatan point that will Penyuluh Perikanan be included WWF-Indonesia in the shrimp Loka PSPL Sorong harvest Pengusaha udang strategy in the UoA. A4.2 Drafting SDI-DJPT Pengusaha Udang 3 month Year 5 – Q1 Availability of a draft a shrimp Biro Hukum BRPL shrimp harvest strategy at harvest KKP SDI-DJPT UoA strategy at KOMNASKAJISKAN the UoA Pelabuhan Perikanan Sorong UNIPA POLTEK Sorong UMS Loka PSPL Sorong BAPPEDA Papua Barat BAPPENAS Perwakilan Nelayan

A4.3 SDI-DJPT Pengusaha Udang 3 month Year 1 – Q2 Availability of POKJA that Conducting Biro Hukum BRPL will oversee the pre-public KKP SDI-DJPT implementation of FIP and consultation KOMNASKAJISKAN Harvest Strategy for Pelabuhan consolidation Perikanan Sorong at the Pokja

37 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

and team UNIPA level and POLTEK Sorong related local UMS governments. Loka PSPL Sorong BAPPEDA Papua Barat BAPPENAS Perwakilan Nelayan

A4.4 Public SDI-DJPT Pengusaha Udang 3 Month Year 5 – Q2 The availability of a consultation Biro Hukum BRPL shrimp harvest strategy of the draft KKP SDI-DJPT document at the UoA that shrimp KOMNASKAJISKAN has been agreed by harvest Pelabuhan stakeholders strategy at Perikanan Sorong the UoA UNIPA POLTEK Sorong UMS Loka PSPL Sorong BAPPEDA Papua Barat BAPPENAS Perwakilan Nelayan

A4.5 SDI-DJPT Pengusaha Udang 1 Month Year 5 – Q4 Availability of a approved Approval of Biro Hukum BRPL shrimp harvest strategy in the shrimp KKP SDI-DJPT the UoA harvest KOMNASKAJISKAN strategy at Pelabuhan the UoA Perikanan Sorong UNIPA POLTEK Sorong UMS Loka PSPL Sorong BAPPEDA Papua Barat BAPPENAS Perwakilan Nelayan

A4.6 Shrimp DKP Papua SDI-DJPT 3 Month Year 6 – Q1 The availability of reports harvest Barat WWF-Indonesia on the socialization of strategy DKP Sorong Pelabuhan shrimp harvest strategies socialization Selatan Perikanan Sorong at UoA at UoA Penyuluh PT. IMPD Perikanan Loka PSPL Sorong BRPL UNIPA Poltek Sorong UMS Perwakilan Nelayan

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 38

A4.7 Annual SDI-DJPT DKP Papua Barat 2 Month Conducted Availability of annual review of the DKP Sorong every year review activity reports on shrimp Selatan shrimp harvest strategies harvest Penyuluh Perikanan at the UoA strategy at WWF-Indonesia the UoA Pelabuhan Perikanan Sorong PT. IMPD Loka PSPL Sorong BRPL UNIPA Poltek Sorong UMS

Table 12. FIP Action Plan for Action 5

Action ID Action 5 Action Name Collect bycatch data from the trammel net The availability of bycatch data from the trammel net to monitor the impact of the trammel net on bycatch. If it is known that there are damaging or irreversible impacts, it can take Action Target management steps to recover bycatch species. Action 5 link with action 2 PI 2.1.3 (SG <60) PI 2.2.3 (SG <60) Performance PI 2.5.1 (SG 60-79) Indicator PI 2.5.2 (SG 60-79) PI 2.5.3 (SG 60-79)

Time continously expectations Responsible Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of completion Sub-Action - Action - Time completion coordinator A5.1 Penyuluh PT. IMPD 2 Month Year 1 – Q3 Report on the Socializing e- Perikanan BRPL socialization of logbook logbook POKJA SDI-DJPT recording activities to recording to KOMNASKAJISKAN shrimp fishermen / shrimp Pelabuhan enumerators at the UoA. fishermen / Perikanan Sorong enumerators UNIPA at UoA. POLTEK Sorong UMS Note: Loka PSPL Sorong It is better if data collection can be

39 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

started from existing groups as project pilots. -Can start making KUB. A5.2 Nelayan Penyuluh Perikanan Continously Continously The availability of logbook Logbook Enumerator PT. IMPD data of fishermen's catch recording by BRPL in 1 shrimp fishing cycle shrimp SDI-DJPT fishermen / KOMNASKAJISKAN enumerators Pelabuhan at the UoA. Perikanan Sorong UNIPA POLTEK Sorong UMS Loka PSPL Sorong

A5.3 Annual KOMNAS UNIPA 1 Month Conducted Availability of activity meeting of KAJISKAN POLTEK Sorong every year reports on the evaluation logbook data BRPL UMS of trammel net catch evaluation SDI-DJPT logbook data at the UoA DKP Papua Barat DKP Sorong Selatan Penyuluh Perikanan WWF-Indonesia Loka PSPL Sorong Nelayan

A5.4 Assess BRPL SDI-DJPT 1 Month Conducted Availability of study the impact of UNIPA DKP Papua Barat every year results on the impact of trammel net Poltek DKP Sorong trammel net activities on activities on Sorong Selatan bycatch and ecosystems. bycatch and UMS Penyuluh Perikanan ecosystems. WWF-Indonesia Can be used as a basis Pelabuhan for making management Perikanan Sorong to minimize the impact of PT. IMPD trammel net on bycatch Loka PSPL Sorong and the ecosystem if needed. A5.5 Making BRPL SDI-DJPT 2 Month Conducted Availability of scientific scientific UNIPA DKP Papua Barat every year publications based on the publications Poltek DKP Sorong results of stock status on the impact Sorong Selatan studies and harvest of trammel UMS Penyuluh Perikanan reference points for target net activities WWF-Indonesia species on bycatch Pelabuhan and Perikanan Sorong ecosystems. PT. IMPD

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 40

Loka PSPL Sorong

Table 13. FIP Action Plan for Action 6

Action ID Action 6 Action Name Collecting data on the boat (Observer on board) Action Availability of data and information related to ETP and ghost net interactions. Can be used as a Target basis for managing the impact of the trammel net on ETP if necessary. PI 2.2.2 (SG 60-79) Performance PI 2.3.1 (SG 60-79) Indicator PI 2.3.2 (SG 60-79) PI 2.3.3 (SG 60-79) Time Continously expectations Responsible - Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of completion Sub-Action Action - Time completion coordinator A6.1 On SDI-DJPT DKP Papua Barat 1 Month Year 1 – Q3 Availability of reports on board DKP Sorong Observer training observer Selatan activities for trammel net training for Penyuluh perikanan vessels at the UoA trammel net PT. IMPD vessels at Nelayan UoA UNIPA Poltek Sorong UMS Pelabuhan Perikanan Sorong Loka PSPL Sorong

A.6.2 Carry Observer DKP Papua Barat Continously Continously Availability of data and out data DKP Sorong information related to the collection on Selatan interaction of ETP and the boat with Penyuluh perikanan ghost net on the ship the observer PT. IMPD trammel net on board Nelayan

A6.3 Annual SDI-DJPT UNIPA 1 Month Continously Availability of reports on meeting to POLTEK Sorong the Observer data evaluate UMS evaluation activities at observer SDI-DJPT the UoA data on DKP Papua Barat board DKP Sorong Selatan Penyuluh Perikanan WWF-Indonesia Loka PSPL Sorong Nelayan

41 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

Observer

A6.4 Test the UMS PT. IMPD if if necessary Availability of activity ETP bycatch POLTEK DKP Provinsi Papua necessary reports from the ETP mitigation Sorong Barat bycatch mitigation tool tool UNIPA DKP Sorong trial BPPI Selatan Semarang Penyuluh perikanan Nelayan A6.5 Penyuluh PT. IMPD 1 Month Year 1 – Q4 Availability of activity Socialization Perikanan/PO DKP Provinsi Papua reports from the of ETP KJA Sorong Barat socialization of ETP handling on Selatan DKP Sorong handling on board board Selatan Nelayan

Table 14. FIP Action Plan for Action 7

Action ID Action 7 Action Name Conduct an assessment of the trammel net impact on habitat Availability of periodic results of trammel net impact studies on habitat. To monitor impacts and Action Target can form the basis for making habitat management when needed. PI 2.4.1 (SG 60-79) Performance PI 2.4.2 (SG <60) Indicator PI 2.4.3 (SG 60-79) Time Periodically expectations Responsible Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of completion Sub-Action - Action - Time completion coordinator A7.1 UMS DKP Papua Barat 1 Month Year 2 – Q1 Availability of an agreed Stakeholder POLTEK DP Sorong Selatan methodology meeting to Sorong BRPL determine UNIPA SDI-DJPT the methodology for the habitat impact assessment A7.2 UMS DKP Papua Barat 2 Month Periodically Availability of information Conduct an POLTEK DP Sorong Selatan regarding the impact of assessment Sorong BRPL trammel net activities on of the UNIPA SDI-DJPT habitat trammel net impact activities on habitat

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 42

Table 15. FIP Action Plan for Action 8

Action ID Action 8 Action Name Law enforcement of existing regulations The existing regulations at the central and regional levels related to fisheries management in Action Target the UoA are properly implemented and monitored Performance PI 3.1.1 (SG 60-79) Indicator PI 3.2.3 (SG <60) Time Continously expectations Responsible Action partners Resources Date of Evidence of Sub-Action - Action - Time completion completion coordinator A.8.1 Establish LPP- DJPT 1 Year Year 3 – Q3 Availability of POKJA a POKJA in WPP715 BRPL that can oversee the South Sorong UMS implementation and to oversee the POLTEK Sorong monitoring of the shrimp implementation UNIPA DKP Papua harvest strategy in the and monitoring Barat UoA, as well as related of the shrimp DKP Sorong regulations. harvest Selatan strategy in the Dll UoA, as well as related regulations.

Note: The working group specifically manages the south sorong.

A.8.2 Carry out DKP Sorong Penyuluh perikanan 6 Month Year 1 – Q2 Availability of information the registration Selatan PT. IMPD regarding the number of process for POKJA DKP Papua Barat vessels that have been shrimp fishing PTSP registered vessels <5GT Syahbandar in the entire dll South Sorong area issued by the West Papua DKP. A.8.3 DKP Sorong Penyuluh perikanan 3 Months Year 6 – Q2 Reports activities of Disseminate Selatan/ PT. IMPD socialization existing POKJA DKP Papua Barat regulations at DKP Sorong both the Selatan central and regional levels.

43 | SOCIALIZATION OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT RESULT AND DISCUSSION ON FIP ACTION PLAN USAID.GOV

A.8.4 PSDKP Masyarakat adat Continously Continously Availability of information Conducting DKP Sorong and documentation of patrols and law Selatan monitoring activities and enforcement of Kelompok Nelayan findings of cases existing handled regulations.

Note: In implementing patrols, cooperation between provincial and district governments is required can also use the WA Gateway in the PSDKP

ANNEX IV. LINK OF MSC PRE ASSESSMENT REPORT https://bit.ly/MSC_PA_Report

ANNEX V. LINK OF FIP ACTION PLAN DOCUMENT https://bit.ly/FIP_Action_Plan_Sorsel

ANNEX VI. LINK OF SOCIALIZATION DOCUMENTATIONS https://bit.ly/Documentations_24-25Nov2020

ANNEX VII. TOR AND APPROVAL https://bit.ly/ToR_Socialization_MSC_PA

USAID.GOV SMALL-SCALE VESSEL REGISTRATION MEETING WITH NGO PARTNERS | 44