DOCSLIB.ORG

Results Summary - All Ballots Printed On: 2011/05/27 11:25:25

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Results Summary - All Ballots Printed On: 2011/05/27 11:25:25 Results Summary - All Ballots Printed on: 2011/05/27 11:25:25 Electoral Event: Local Government Elections 2011 Province: All Provinces Municipality: All Municipalities Ward: All Wards Voting District: All Voting Districts 7RWDO 7RWDO$OO%DOORWV Party Name Ward PR DC 40% :DUG35 :DUG35'& 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV ABOLITION OF INCOME TAX AND 230 0.00 % 165 0.00 % 395 0.00 % - - 395 0.00 % USURY PARTY ADELAIDE RESIDENTS 244 0.00 % 222 0.00 % 466 0.00 % - - 466 0.00 % ASSOCIATION AFRICA MUSLIM PARTY 4,430 0.03 % 3,157 0.02 % 7,587 0.03 % - - 7,587 0.02 % AFRICAN BOND OF UNITY 727 0.01 % 730 0.01 % 1,457 0.01 % - - 1,457 0.00 % AFRICAN CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE- 4,532 0.03 % 3,077 0.02 % 7,609 0.03 % 357 0.00 % 7,966 0.02 % AFRIKANER CHRISTEN ALLIANSIE AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC 86,865 0.65 % 78,737 0.59 % 165,602 0.62 % 43,948 0.56 % 209,550 0.61 % PARTY AFRICAN COMMUNITY MOVEMENT 658 0.00 % 497 0.00 % 1,155 0.00 % - - 1,155 0.00 % Page: 1 of 10 7RWDO 7RWDO$OO%DOORWV Party Name Ward PR DC 40% :DUG35 :DUG35'& 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV AFRICAN DEMOCRATIC CHANGE 326 0.00 % 300 0.00 % 626 0.00 % - - 626 0.00 % AFRICAN INDEPENDENT 8,605 0.06 % 23,414 0.18 % 32,019 0.12 % 15,788 0.20 % 47,807 0.14 % CONGRESS AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS 8,143,541 60.98 % 8,405,429 62.93 % 16,548,970 61.95 % 5,455,411 69.43 % 22,004,381 63.65 % AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION 38,159 0.29 % 54,332 0.41 % 92,491 0.35 % 22,650 0.29 % 115,141 0.33 % AL JAMA-AH 6,337 0.05 % 6,890 0.05 % 13,227 0.05 % - - 13,227 0.04 % AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION 24,331 0.18 % 26,300 0.20 % 50,631 0.19 % 19,202 0.24 % 69,833 0.20 % BEDFORD RESIDENTS' 63 0.00 % 48 0.00 % 111 0.00 % - - 111 0.00 % ASSOCIATION BELASTINGBETALERSVERENING 257 0.00 % 87 0.00 % 344 0.00 % - - 344 0.00 % VAN PARYS BETER BLOEMHOF PARTY 166 0.00 % 188 0.00 % 354 0.00 % - - 354 0.00 % BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS PARTY 2,487 0.02 % 3,476 0.03 % 5,963 0.02 % 541 0.01 % 6,504 0.02 % BLACK ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT 60 0.00 % 154 0.00 % 214 0.00 % - - 214 0.00 % PARTY BREEDEVALLEI ONAFHANKLIK 1,554 0.01 % 1,715 0.01 % 3,269 0.01 % - - 3,269 0.01 % BUSHBUCKRIDGE RESIDENTS 11,103 0.08 % 11,153 0.08 % 22,256 0.08 % - - 22,256 0.06 % ASSOCIATION CAPE AGULHAS RATEPAYERS 119 0.00 % 156 0.00 % 275 0.00 % - - 275 0.00 % ASSOCIATION Page: 2 of 10 7RWDO 7RWDO$OO%DOORWV Party Name Ward PR DC 40% :DUG35 :DUG35'& 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV CAPE MUSLIM CONGRESS 3,658 0.03 % 2,740 0.02 % 6,398 0.02 % - - 6,398 0.02 % CAPE PARTY/ KAAPSE PARTY 1,711 0.01 % 1,670 0.01 % 3,381 0.01 % 584 0.01 % 3,965 0.01 % CATHCART RESIDENTS 689 0.01 % 656 0.00 % 1,345 0.01 % - - 1,345 0.00 % ASSOCIATION CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY 3,566 0.03 % 3,010 0.02 % 6,576 0.02 % - - 6,576 0.02 % CHRISTIAN FRONT 615 0.00 % 625 0.00 % 1,240 0.00 % - - 1,240 0.00 % CIVIC ALLIANCE OF SOUTH AFRICA 1,192 0.01 % 819 0.01 % 2,011 0.01 % - - 2,011 0.01 % CIVIC DEMOCRATS 122 0.00 % 179 0.00 % 301 0.00 % - - 301 0.00 % CIVIC INDEPENDENT 3,119 0.02 % 3,852 0.03 % 6,971 0.03 % 6,517 0.08 % 13,488 0.04 % COMMUNITY COALITION 1,715 0.01 % 1,271 0.01 % 2,986 0.01 % - - 2,986 0.01 % COMMUNITY WORKERS FORUM 261 0.00 % 244 0.00 % 505 0.00 % - - 505 0.00 % CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE 274,079 2.05 % 296,624 2.22 % 570,703 2.14 % 236,396 3.01 % 807,099 2.33 % DAGGA PARTY 124 0.00 % 124 0.00 % 248 0.00 % - - 248 0.00 % DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE/DEMOKRATIESE 3,177,884 23.80 % 3,216,006 24.08 % 6,393,890 23.94 % 1,202,562 15.30 % 7,596,452 21.97 % ALLIANSIE Page: 3 of 10 7RWDO 7RWDO$OO%DOORWV Party Name Ward PR DC 40% :DUG35 :DUG35'& 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV DEMOCRATIC ASSOCIATION OF 334 0.00 % 282 0.00 % 616 0.00 % - - 616 0.00 % WITZENBERG INDEPENDENCE DEMOCRATIC CHRISTIAN PARTY 1,028 0.01 % 1,116 0.01 % 2,144 0.01 % 1,184 0.02 % 3,328 0.01 % DEMOCRATS FOR CHANGE 942 0.01 % 1,637 0.01 % 2,579 0.01 % - - 2,579 0.01 % DIKWANKWETLA PARTY OF SOUTH 14,269 0.11 % 13,765 0.10 % 28,034 0.10 % 14,129 0.18 % 42,163 0.12 % AFRICA DISPLACEES RATE-PAYERS 3,759 0.03 % 3,222 0.02 % 6,981 0.03 % - - 6,981 0.02 % ASSOCIATION FEDERAL CONGRESS 2,247 0.02 % 2,384 0.02 % 4,631 0.02 % 2,631 0.03 % 7,262 0.02 % FIRST NATION LIBERATION 620 0.00 % 639 0.00 % 1,259 0.00 % - - 1,259 0.00 % ALLIANCE FUTURE DEMOCRATIC PARTY 439 0.00 % 447 0.00 % 886 0.00 % - - 886 0.00 % GEORGE INDEPENDENT 813 0.01 % 568 0.00 % 1,381 0.01 % - - 1,381 0.00 % RATEPAYERS FORUM GREAT KONGRESS OF SOUTH 663 0.00 % 549 0.00 % 1,212 0.00 % 537 0.01 % 1,749 0.01 % AFRICA IKUSASA LESIZWE INDEPENDENT 1,238 0.01 % 3,243 0.02 % 4,481 0.02 % 3,220 0.04 % 7,701 0.02 % MOVEMENT INDEPENDENT 302,243 2.26 % - - 302,243 1.13 % - - 302,243 0.87 % INDEPENDENT CIVIC 7,297 0.05 % 7,299 0.05 % 14,596 0.05 % 7,196 0.09 % 21,792 0.06 % ORGANISATION OF SOUTH AFRICA INDEPENDENT CONGRESS 84 0.00 % 37 0.00 % 121 0.00 % - - 121 0.00 % Page: 4 of 10 7RWDO 7RWDO$OO%DOORWV Party Name Ward PR DC 40% :DUG35 :DUG35'& 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV INDEPENDENT RATEPAYERS 9,484 0.07 % 5,446 0.04 % 14,930 0.06 % 2,258 0.03 % 17,188 0.05 % ASSOCIATION OF SA INDEPENDENT RESIDENTS 380 0.00 % 366 0.00 % 746 0.00 % - - 746 0.00 % ASSOCIATION INKATHA FREEDOM PARTY 478,400 3.58 % 475,621 3.56 % 954,021 3.57 % 406,319 5.17 % 1,360,340 3.94 % KAROO GEMEENSKAP PARTY 2,632 0.02 % 2,635 0.02 % 5,267 0.02 % - - 5,267 0.02 % KAYAMANDI COMMUNITY ALLIANCE 163 0.00 % 178 0.00 % 341 0.00 % - - 341 0.00 % KHOISAN PARTY 262 0.00 % 298 0.00 % 560 0.00 % 512 0.01 % 1,072 0.00 % KOUGA 2000 241 0.00 % 245 0.00 % 486 0.00 % - - 486 0.00 % LEBALENG COMMUNIST PARTY 226 0.00 % 343 0.00 % 569 0.00 % - - 569 0.00 % LIBERAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY 31 0.00 % 236 0.00 % 267 0.00 % - - 267 0.00 % LIBERAL PEOPLE'S PARTY 227 0.00 % 208 0.00 % 435 0.00 % 312 0.00 % 747 0.00 % LOCAL GOVERNMENT PARTY 233 0.00 % 198 0.00 % 431 0.00 % - - 431 0.00 % MAKANA INDEPENDENT NEW DEAL 593 0.00 % 483 0.00 % 1,076 0.00 % - - 1,076 0.00 % MERAFONG CIVIC ASSOCIATION 619 0.00 % 570 0.00 % 1,189 0.00 % - - 1,189 0.00 % MINORITY FRONT 60,153 0.45 % 53,042 0.40 % 113,195 0.42 % 958 0.01 % 114,153 0.33 % Page: 5 of 10 7RWDO 7RWDO$OO%DOORWV Party Name Ward PR DC 40% :DUG35 :DUG35'& 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV MOVEMENT DEMOCRATIC PARTY 1,307 0.01 % 822 0.01 % 2,129 0.01 % - - 2,129 0.01 % MPUMALANGA PARTY 12,882 0.10 % 13,429 0.10 % 26,311 0.10 % - - 26,311 0.08 % NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR 1,008 0.01 % 629 0.00 % 1,637 0.01 % - - 1,637 0.00 % DEMOCRACY NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC 375 0.00 % 208 0.00 % 583 0.00 % 380 0.00 % 963 0.00 % CONVENTION NATIONAL FREEDOM PARTY 326,565 2.45 % 318,352 2.38 % 644,917 2.41 % 247,340 3.15 % 892,257 2.58 % NATIONAL INDEPENDANT CIVIC 4,113 0.03 % 3,386 0.03 % 7,499 0.03 % 2,026 0.03 % 9,525 0.03 % ORGANISATION NATIONAL PARTY SOUTH AFRICA 5,718 0.04 % 6,038 0.05 % 11,756 0.04 % - - 11,756 0.03 % NATIONAL PEOPLE'S PARTY 8,713 0.07 % 7,724 0.06 % 16,437 0.06 % 7,283 0.09 % 23,720 0.07 % NATIONAL REPUBLICAN PARTY 572 0.00 % 379 0.00 % 951 0.00 % - - 951 0.00 % NEW GENERATION PARTY 965 0.01 % 912 0.01 % 1,877 0.01 % - - 1,877 0.01 % NXUBA COMMUNITY 809 0.01 % 744 0.01 % 1,553 0.01 % - - 1,553 0.00 % ORGANISATION OPERATION KHANYISA MOVEMENT 1,666 0.01 % 2,757 0.02 % 4,423 0.02 % - - 4,423 0.01 % OU PACALTSDORP INWONERS - - 155 0.00 % 155 0.00 % - - 155 0.00 % VERENIGING OWETHU RESIDENTS 1,187 0.01 % 957 0.01 % 2,144 0.01 % - - 2,144 0.01 % ORGANISATION Page: 6 of 10 7RWDO 7RWDO$OO%DOORWV Party Name Ward PR DC 40% :DUG35 :DUG35'& 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 7RWDO 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9DOLG 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV 9RWHV PAN AFRICANIST CONGRESS OF 63,825 0.48 % 54,846 0.41 % 118,671 0.44 % 28,918 0.37 % 147,589 0.43 % AZANIA PAN AFRICANIST MOVEMENT 2,263 0.02 % 2,352 0.02 % 4,615 0.02 % 2,345 0.03 % 6,960 0.02 % PEOPLE'S CIVIC ORGANISATION 2,636 0.02 % 2,287 0.02 % 4,923 0.02 % - - 4,923 0.01 % PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC 1,662 0.01 % 1,526 0.01 % 3,188 0.01 % 1,550 0.02 % 4,738 0.01 % MOVEMENT PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC PARTY 107 0.00 % 60 0.00 % 167 0.00 % - - 167 0.00 % PHUMELELA RATEPAYERS' 293 0.00 % 175 0.00 % 468 0.00 % - - 468 0.00 % ASSOCIATION PLAASLIKE BESORGDE INWONERS 1,668 0.01 % 1,573 0.01 % 3,241 0.01 % - - 3,241 0.01 % PLETTENBERG BAY COMMUNITY 34 0.00 % 48 0.00 % 82 0.00 % - - 82 0.00 % FORUM ROYAL LOYAL PROGRESS 2,385 0.02 % 2,561 0.02 % 4,946 0.02 % 2,997 0.04 % 7,943 0.02 % SERVICE TO OUR PEOPLE'S PARTY 397 0.00 % 330 0.00 % 727 0.00 % - - 727 0.00 % SIMUNYE IN CHRIST 873 0.01 % 650 0.00 % 1,523 0.01 % - - 1,523 0.00 % ORGANISATION SINDAWONYE PROGRESSIVE 5,130 0.04 % 5,712 0.04 % 10,842 0.04 % 5,677 0.07 % 16,519 0.05 % PARTY SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC PARTY 93 0.00 % 167 0.00 % 260 0.00 % - - 260 0.00 % SOCIALIST CIVIC MOVEMENT 772 0.01 % 2,125 0.02 % 2,897
Load more

Recommended publications
  • & Participation
    POWER & PARTICIPATION HOW LGBTIQ PEOPLE CAN SHAPE SOUTH AFRICAN POLITICS PUBLISHED BY TRIANGLE PROJECT & THE LGBTQ VICTORY INSTITUTE • FEBRUARY 2018 triangle project ISBN 978-0-620-77688-2 RESEARCHER AND AUTHOR Jennifer Thorpe CONTRIBUTORS Triangle Project Team: Matthew Clayton Elsbeth Engelbrecht LGBTQ Victory Institute team: Luis Anguita-Abolafia Caryn Viverito DESIGN & LAYOUT Carol Burmeister FIRST EDITION Printed in South Africa, February 2018 THANKS This study was made possible thanks to the support of the Astraea OPEN SOCIETY FOUNDATION Lesbian Foundation for Justice FOR SOUTH AFRICA and the Open Society Foundation of South Africa. The content of this material may be reproduced in whole or in part in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, photocopied or other means, provided the source is cited, that the use is non-commercial and does not place additional restrictions on the material. The ideas and opinions expressed in this book are the sole responsibility of the authors and those persons interviewed and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of Triangle Project or the LGBTQ Victory Institute. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY 1 2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND LIMITATIONS 2 2.1 METHODOLOGY 2 2.2. LIMITATIONS 2 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 4 3.1 THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLITICAL LANDSCAPE 1994 – 2017: AN OVERVIEW 4 3.2 TRANSFORMATION WITHIN THE SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT 6 3.3 LGBTIQ MILESTONES SINCE 1994 AND SA'S COMMITMENT TO HUMAN RIGHTS FOR LGBTIQ PERSONS 8 4 RESEARCH RESULTS 11 4.1 SURVEY 12 4.2 CIVIL SOCIETY INTERVIEWS 23 4.3 POLITICAL PARTIES' PERSPECTIVES ON LGBTIQ POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 34 5 BEST PRACTICE GUIDE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR LGBTIQ POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 43 6 DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 48 7 REFERENCES 49 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In early 2017, Triangle Project (Triangle) and research on political participation in South Africa, and the LGBTQ Victory Institute (Victory Institute) political party manifesto and policy analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Movement in the Non-Profit Industrial Complex
    Building A Movement In The Non-Profit Industrial Complex Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michelle Oyakawa Graduate Program in Sociology The Ohio State University 2017 Dissertation Committee: Korie Edwards, Advisor Andrew Martin Steve Lopez Copyrighted by Michelle Mariko Oyakawa 2017 Abstract Today, democracy in the United States is facing a major challenge: Wealthy elites have immense power to influence election outcomes and policy decisions, while the political participation of low-income people and racial minorities remains relatively low. In this context, non-profit social movement organizations are one of the key vehicles through which ordinary people can exercise influence in our political system and pressure elite decision-makers to take action on matters of concern to ordinary citizens. A crucial fact about social movement organizations is that they often receive significant financial support from elites through philanthropic foundations. However, there is no research that details exactly how non-profit social movement organizations gain resources from elites or that analyzes how relationships with elite donors impact grassroots organizations’ efforts to mobilize people to fight for racial and economic justice. My dissertation aims to fill that gap. It is an ethnographic case study of a multiracial statewide organization called the Ohio Organizing Collaborative (OOC) that coordinates progressive social movement organizations in Ohio. Member organizations work on a variety of issues, including ending mass incarceration, environmental justice, improving access to early childhood education, and raising the minimum wage. In 2016, the OOC registered over 155,000 people to vote in Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • CES Virtual 27Th International Conference of Europeanists Europe's Past, Present, and Future: Utopias and Dystopias All Sessio
    CES Virtual 27th International Conference of Europeanists Europe’s Past, Present, and Future: Utopias and Dystopias All sessions are listed in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). This Revised Preliminary Program is subject to change. We have tried to accommodate all of the submitted rescheduling requests. The Final Conference Program will be available on May 25, 2021. Please contact [email protected] about program-related updates by May 7, 2021. April 27, 2021 Pre-Conference and Conference Side Events MONDAY, JUNE 14 Territorial Politics and Federalism Research Network Business Meeting 6/14/2021 1:00 PM to 2:30 PM Business Meeting Chair: Willem Maas - York University TUESDAY, JUNE 15 Crises of Democracy 6/15/2021 10:00 AM to 11:30 PM Keynote Sponsored by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Chair: Nicole Shea – Director, Council for European Studies Speakers: Eileen Gillooly - Executive Director, Heyman Center for the Humanities, Columbia University Jane Ohlmeyer - Professor of History at Trinity College and Chair of the Irish Research Council European Integration and Political Economy Research Network Speed Mentoring Event 6/15/2021 10:30 AM to 2:30 PM Networking Event Chair: Dermot Hodson - Birkbeck, University of London WEDNESDAY, JUNE 16 How to Pitch to Publishers 6/16/2021 10:00 AM to 11:30 PM Speakers: Andrew Kinney - General Editor, Harvard University Press Jaya Aninda Chatterjee - Editor for World History, Geopolitics, and International Relations, Yale University Press 2 Mary Al-Sayed - Editor for Anthropology and History (World history;
    [Show full text]
  • Korea Focus Briefing 01
    Korea Focus One election, two winners South Korea‘s parliamentary elections marked by success in the fight against the corona pandemic Eric J. Ballbach KDI School-FU Korea-Europe Programme Institute of Korean Studies Freie Universität Berlin, Germany Briefing No. 1 2020 Copyright to papers in this series remains with the authors or their assignees. Reproduction or reposting of texts in this paper can only be done with the permission of the respective author. The proper form for citing working papers in this series is: Name of author or editor. (Year). Title. Working paper, Freie Universität Berlin, Institute of Korean Studies, Berlin. Briefing No. 01 Korea Focus One election, two winners South Korea‘s parliamentary elections marked by success in the fight against the corona pandemic Dr. Eric J. Ballbach* KDI School-FU Korea-Europe Programme Institute of Korean Studies Freie Univesität Berlin 2020 The parliamentary elections in South Korea on 15 April were the first nationwide democratic elections since the outbreak of the corona pandemic. The fact that these elections could be and were held at all is directly related to the strategy that the South Korean government is pursuing to contain the pandemic. The clear winner was the incumbent President Moon Jae-in, who was rewarded in particular for his successful crisis management. But the election is also a victory for the still comparatively young democracy in South Korea. Since the government and the population have learned from the experience of previous epidemics, citizens have not had to choose between exercising their democratic rights and protecting their health.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ——————————
    08-3075-CV United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit —————————— LORI S. MASLOW, JEMEL JOHNSON, KENNETH BARTHOLEMEW, PHILIP J. SMALLMAN, and JOHN G. SERPICO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, CAROL FAISON, MARIA GOMES, ZACARY LARECHE, and LIVIE ANGLADE, Plaintiffs, -against- BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee. —————————— On appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York ŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷ APPELLANTS’ BRIEF AND SPECIAL APPENDIX ŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷŷ AARON D. MASLOW Attorney for Appellants 1761 Stuart Street Brooklyn, New York 11229 Tel. (718) 375-8211 Fax (718) 375-2114 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES . iii PRELIMINARY STATEMENT . 1 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT . 1 (A) DISTRICT COURT’S JURISDICTION . 1 (B) COURT OF APPEALS’ JURISDICTION . 2 (C) TIMELINESS OF APPEAL . 2 (D) FINALITY STATEMENT . 2 ISSUES PRESENTED . .3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE . 4 STATEMENT OF FACTS . 8 (A) NEW YORK’S STATUTORY PROVISIONS . 8 (B) CANDIDATE PLAINTIFFS’ 2006 PETITIONING EFFORT . 10 (C) NON-CANDIDATE PLAINTIFFS . 14 (D) DEFENDANT BOARD OF ELECTIONS . 17 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT . 18 ARGUMENT . 20 POINT I THIS COURT SHOULD CONDUCT A DE NOVO REVIEW OF THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. 20 POINT II THE DECISION OF THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN BUCKLEY V. AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOUNDATION, INC., AND NOT THAT IN NEW YORK STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS V. LOPEZ TORRES, IS DISPOSITIVE OF THE ISSUE IN DISPUTE. 22 i (A) BUCKLEY V. AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOUNDATION, INC., AND ITS PROGENT CASES 22 (B) NEW YORK STATE BD. OF ELECTIONS V. LOPEZ TORRES 26 (C) CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRICT COURT’S DECISION 29 POINT III PETITION CIRCULATION IS CORE POLITICAL SPEECH AND SINCE NEW YORK’S PARTY WITNESS RULE IMPOSES A SEVERE BURDEN ON SUCH SPEECH IT MUST UNDERGO STRICT SCRUTINY.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions in Politics Vol. I
    Questions in Politics The Journal of the Volume I • 2013 Questions in Politics Editorial Staff Editors in Chief Thomas E. Rotnem Southern Polytechnic State University [email protected] Adam P. Stone Georgia Perimeter College [email protected] Editor James Larry Taulbee Emory University Managing Editor Matthew E. Van Atta Founding Editor and Editor Emeritus Joseph S. Trachtenberg Clayton State University About the GPSA http://www.gpsausa.org Founded in 1968, the Georgia Political Science Association (GPSA) is the professional association for political science practitioners and educators in Georgia. Membership is drawn from the public, private, and academic sectors. We welcome members, attendees, participants, and students from around the world. Questions in Politics is the official journal publication of the GPSA. Questions in Politics The Journal of the Georgia Political Science Association Volume I Contents Preface .................................................................................................. iii Abstracts ................................................................................................. v Post-Local Autonomy Settlement and Local Minorities: A Comparative Analysis of Minority Accommodation in Aceh, Kosovo, and Sudan Arild Schou ............................................................................................. 1 From Armed Struggle to Peaceful Change: ETA’s Role in a Basque Peace Process Cleo Dan .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Repudiation! the Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870
    Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva Pierre du Bois Foundation GOVERNMENT DEBT CRISES: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, AND HISTORY December 14-15, 2012 Repudiation! The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870 Dr. Franklin Noll President Noll Historical Consulting, LLC Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196409 Repudiation! The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870 Dr. Franklin Noll President Noll Historical Consulting, LLC 220 Lastner Lane Greenbelt, MD 20770 USA Email: [email protected] Website: www.franklinnoll.com The author would like to thank Bruce Baker, Jane Flaherty, and Julia Ott for their comments. Abstract: From 1865 to 1870, a crisis atmosphere hovered around the issue of the massive public debt created during the recently concluded Civil War, leading, in part, to the passage of a Constitutional Amendment ensuring the “validity of the public debt.” However, the Civil War debt crisis was not a financial one, but a political one. The Republican and Democratic Parties took concerns over the public debt and magnified them into panics so that they could serve political ends—there was never any real danger that the United States would default on its debt for financial reasons. There were, in fact, three interrelated crises generated during the period: a repudiation crisis (grounded upon fears of the cancellation of the war debt), a repayment crisis (arising from calls to repay the debt in depreciated currency), and a refunding crisis (stemming from a concern of a run on the Treasury). The end of the Civil War debt crisis came only when there was no more political advantage to be gained from exploiting the issue of the public debt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Repudiation: The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870 Noll, Franklin December 2012 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/43540/ MPRA Paper No. 43540, posted 03 Jan 2013 04:20 UTC Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva Pierre du Bois Foundation GOVERNMENT DEBT CRISES: POLITICS, ECONOMICS, AND HISTORY December 14-15, 2012 Repudiation! The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870 Dr. Franklin Noll President Noll Historical Consulting, LLC Repudiation! The Crisis of United States Civil War Debt, 1865-1870 Dr. Franklin Noll President Noll Historical Consulting, LLC 220 Lastner Lane Greenbelt, MD 20770 USA Email: [email protected] Website: www.franklinnoll.com The author would like to thank Bruce Baker, Jane Flaherty, and Julia Ott for their comments. Abstract: From 1865 to 1870, a crisis atmosphere hovered around the issue of the massive public debt created during the recently concluded Civil War, leading, in part, to the passage of a Constitutional Amendment ensuring the “validity of the public debt.” However, the Civil War debt crisis was not a financial one, but a political one. The Republican and Democratic Parties took concerns over the public debt and magnified them into panics so that they could serve political ends—there was never any real danger that the United States would default on its debt for financial reasons. There were, in fact, three interrelated crises generated during the period: a repudiation crisis (grounded upon fears of the cancellation of the war debt), a repayment crisis (arising from calls to repay the debt in depreciated currency), and a refunding crisis (stemming from a concern of a run on the Treasury).
    [Show full text]
  • Revista De Stiinte Politice Nr.47
    UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA FACULTY OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES POLITICAL SCIENCES SPECIALIZATION & CENTER OF POST- COMMUNIST POLITICAL STUDIES (CESPO - CEPOS) REVISTA DE ŞTIINȚE POLITICE. REVUE DES SCIENCES POLITIQUES NO. 47 • 2015 1 UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA FACULTY OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCES POLITICAL SCIENCES SPECIALIZATION & CENTER OF POST - COMMUNIST POLITICAL STUDIES (CESPO - CEPOS) Revista de Ştiinţe Politice. Revue des Sciences Politiques No. 47 • 2015 - EDITORIAL BOARD - Editor in chief: ANCA PARMENA OLIMID Deputy editor in chief: CĂTĂLINA MARIA GEORGESCU Managing editor: COSMIN LUCIAN GHERGHE Regular members: IONUȚ ȘERBAN, GEORGE GÎRLEȘTEANU, DANIEL GHIȚĂ, AUREL PIŢURCĂ, CEZAR AVRAM, VLADIMIR OSIAC, MIRON ROMAN, DAN VALERIU VOINEA, MIHAI COSTESCU, MIHAI GHIȚULESCU, MIHAELA BĂRBIERU, MIHAELA CAMELIA ILIE Technical and online assistance: SPERANȚA PREDOI - INTERNATIONAL ADVISO R Y B O A R D - DAN CLAUDIU DĂNIŞOR JONUZ ABDULLAI Professor, University of Craiova, Faculty of Law and Professor , South East European Social Sciences, Romania University, Tetovo, Macedonia (Chairman of the International Advisory Board) SONJA BUNČIČ MIHAI CIMPOI Professor ,University Union, Faculty of President of the Academy of the Republic of Law, Belgrade, Serbia Moldavia, Moldova HARUN ARIKAN YOHANAN MANOR Professor , Cukurova University, Professor, University of Jerusalem, Israel , Adana,Turkey President , Center for Monitoring the Impact of ALI PAJAZITI Peace (CMIP) Professor , South East European JOZE PIRJEVEC University, Tetovo, Macedonia Professor, University
    [Show full text]
  • Good Governance Africa 2019
    April 2019 GOOD GOVERNANCE AFRICA GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE INDEX 2019 Good Governance Africa is a registered pan-African, non-profit organisation. Through cutting-edge research and trend analysis, regular publications and advocacy work, we aim to improve governance across our five key areas: LOCAL GOVERNANCE | NATURAL RESOURCES | NATIONAL SECURITY | CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND YOUTH FORMATION ETHICAL VALUES AND SPIRITUALITY TOP 20 BOTTOM 20 1 Mossel Bay WC DA 194 Nyandeni EC ANC 2 Senqu EC ANC 195 Jozini KZN IFP + 3 Swartland WC DA 196 Nongoma KZN ANC 4 Sol Plaatje NC ANC 197 Makhuduthamaga LIMP ANC 5 Greater KZN ANC 198 Thembisile Hani MPUMA ANC Kokstad 6 Midvaal GP DA 199 Greater Taung NW ANC 7 Khai-Ma NC ANC 200 Ratlou NW ANC Local 8 Bergrivier WC DA/KGP 201. Mbhashe EC ANC 9 Cape WC DA 202 Maphumulo KZN ANC Agulhas 10 Prince Albert WC DA/KGP 203. Ndwedwe KZN ANC 11 Swellendam WC DA 204. Nquthu KZN IFP 12 Cederberg WC DA 205. Umzumbe KZN ANC 13 Matzikama WC DA 206. Mbizana EC ANC 14 Overstrand WC DA/ 207. Engcobo EC ANC COPE 15 Witzenberg WC DA 208. Matatiele EC ANC 16 Koukamma EC ANC 209. Nkandla KZN IFP 17 Hantam NC ANC + 210. Ntabankulu EC ANC 18 Nama Khoi NC ANC/ 211. Port St Johns EC ANC KSR 19 Hessequa WC DA 212. uMhlabuyalingana KZN ANC 20 Langeberg WC DA 213 Msinga KZN ANC 2 GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE INDEX 2019 GOOD GOVERNANCE AFRICA Contents FOREWORD: INSIGHTS INTO MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE 4 DATA AND METHODOLOGY 4 OBSERVATIONS 6 ANALYSIS 7 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 8 SERVICE DELIVERY 11 ADMINISTRATION 13 INTERESTING FINDINGS 15 LIMITATIONS TO THE STUDY 16 IMPORTANT NOTES 16 3 GOOD GOVERNANCE AFRICA FOREWORD: INSIGHTS INTO MUNICIPAL PERFORMANCE The performance of local municipaliti es in South Africa is the indicator of the country’s heartbeat.
    [Show full text]
  • Party ABAHLALI BEMZANSI ORGANISATION ABANTU
    Party ABAHLALI BEMZANSI ORGANISATION ABANTU DEMOCRATIC REVOLUTION ACADEMIC CONGRESS UNION ACTIVE MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE ACTIVE UNITED FRONT ADVIESKANTOOR AFRICA MUSLIM PARTY AFRICAN CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE-AFRIKANER CHRISTEN ALLIANSIE AFRICAN CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY AFRICAN FREEDOM SALVATION AFRICAN INDEPENDENT CONGRESS AFRICAN LIBERATION PARTY AFRICAN MANDATE CONGRESS AFRICAN MANTUNGWA COMMUNITY AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS AFRICAN PEACE PARTY AFRICAN PEOPLE'S CONVENTION AFRICAN PEOPLE'S SOCIALIST PARTY AFRICAN POWER MOVEMENT AGANG SOUTH AFRICA AGENCY FOR NEW AGENDA AGENDA TO CITIZENRY GOVERNORS AL JAMA-AH AL SHURA PARTY ALL UNEMPLOYMENT LABOUR ALLIANCE ALLIANCE FOR DEMOCRATIC FREEDOM ALLIANCE OF DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS ALLIED MOVEMENT FOR CHANGE ALTERNATIVE AFRICAN ALLEGIANCE ALTERNATIVE DEMOCRATS ANSWER FOR COMMUNITY ARE AGENG AFRIKA ASISIKIMENI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ADVICE MOVEMENT AZANIAN ALLIANCE CONGRESS AZANIAN PEOPLE'S ORGANISATION BADIRA MMOGO FREEDOM PARTY BITOU INDEPENDENT PARTY BOLSHEVIKS PARTY OF SOUTH AFRICA BOTHO COMMUNITY MOVEMENT BOTSHABELO UNEMPLOYED MOVEMENT BREEDEVALLEI ONAFHANKLIK BUILDING A COHESIVE SOCIETY BUSHBUCKRIDGE RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION CAPE MUSLIM CONGRESS CAPE PARTY/ KAAPSE PARTY CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATIC PARTY CHRISTIAN DEMOCRATS CHRISTIAN UNITED MOVEMENT S.A (THE RIGHT CHOICE) CIVIC ALLIANCE OF SOUTH AFRICA CIVIC INDEPENDENT CIVIC VOICE CIVIC WARRIORS OF MARULENG COLOURED VOICE COMMUNITY AND WORKERS ALLIANCE COMMUNITY CONGRESS COMMUNITY PARTY CONGRESS OF THE PEOPLE D'ALMEDIA CIVIC ASSOCIATION DEMOCRATIC ALLIANCE DEMOCRATIC
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa 2018 International Religious Freedom Report
    SOUTH AFRICA 2018 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution provides for freedom of religion and belief and prohibits discrimination on the basis of religion. The government does not require religious groups to register; however, registered groups receive tax-exempt status. In September Rastafarians welcomed a Constitutional Court ruling that declared unconstitutional a ban on marijuana cultivation and personal consumption by adults in private homes. Throughout the year, religious groups and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) continued to express concerns that two separate draft laws, one requiring religious groups to register with the government and the other criminalizing, defining, and punishing hate crimes and speech, could potentially infringe on religious freedom and freedom of speech. On May 10, three men attacked the Imam Hussain Mosque, a Shia mosque, located in Durban, in what many stated they believed was a sectarian attack. The assailants stabbed two worshippers, cut the throat of another, and set parts of the mosque on fire, leaving one dead. In July police discovered five explosive devices around Durban. Police affidavits stated the 11 men arrested in connection with the devices and the mosque attack had links to ISIS. The South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) recorded 62 anti-Semitic incidents during the year, compared with 44 in 2017. Numerous individuals made anti-Semitic comments throughout the year. The U.S. consulates in Durban and Cape Town coordinated with several U.S. government agencies to offer workshops on social cohesion and peaceful religious coexistence to local audiences including government officials, law enforcement, NGOs, civil society organizations, religious leaders, academics, and representatives of refugee and immigrant communities.
    [Show full text]