Automative Industry in Russia [EBRD
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Baltic Rim Economies
Baltic Rim Economies Estonia - Latvia - Lithuania - Poland - Baltic Russia Bimonthly Review ISSUE NO. 5, 31 OCTOBER 2008 ECONOMIC REVIEWS: ESTONIA Page 1 LATVIA Page 2 LITHUANIA Page 3 POLAND Page 4 ST. PETERSBURG Page 5 LENINGRAD REGION Page 6 KALININGRAD REGION Page 7 EXPERT ARTICLES: José Manuel Durão Barroso: EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region Page 8 Paula Lehtomäki : Cleaner, safer and brighter future of the Baltic Sea Page 9 Jaak Aaviksoo: Events in Georgia provoke discussions on security in good, old, peaceful Europe Page 10 Siiri Oviir: Gas pipeline to the Baltic Sea – should it come in a civilized way or under the dictate of the big and the powerful? Page 12 Artis Pabriks: Baltic security reflections in the aftermath of the Russian-Georgian conflict Page 13 Efthimios E. Mitropoulos: Busy Baltic to benefit from global pollution measures Page 14 Jari Luoto: EU focuses on the Baltic Sea Page 15 André Mernier: A role for the Energy Charter in a new Russia-EU Partnership Agreement Page 16 Timo Rajala: Finland is facing major energy decisions Page 18 Karlis Mikelsons: Environmentally friendly for sustainable growth Page 19 Reinier Zwitserloot: Nord Stream – making more European energy solidarity possible Page 20 Viktoras Valentukevicius: Current and future activities of Lietuvos Dujos AB Page 21 Seppo Remes: Russian gas can unite Europe – if we allow it Page 22 Aleksandra Mierzyńska and Krzysztof Parkoła: PGNiG – trying to be one step further Page 24 Tapio Reponen: Profiling as a key success factor in modern university strategies Page 25 EXPERT ARTICLES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE To receive a free copy, print or register at www.tse.fi/pei Baltic Rim Economies ISSUE NO. -
US Sanctions on Russia
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L. -
The Russian Transition Challenges for German and American Foreign Policy
THE RUSSIAN TRANSITION CHALLENGES FOR GERMAN AND AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Washington, DC Conference Report Conference Report 9-10 June 1999 American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University Conference Report THE RUSSIAN TRANSITION CHALLENGES FOR GERMAN AND AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY Washington, D.C. 9-10 June 1999 American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (AICGS) is a center for advanced research, study, and discussion on the politics, culture, and society of the Federal Republic of Germany. Established in 1983 and affiliated with The Johns Hopkins University but governed by its own Board of Trustees, AICGS is a privately incorporated institute dedicated to independent, critical, and comprehensive analysis and assessment of current German issues. Its goals are to help develop a new generation of American scholars with a thorough understanding of contemporary Germany, deepen American knowledge and understanding of current German developments, contribute to American policy analysis of problems relating to Germany, and promote interdisciplinary and comparative research on Germany. Executive Director: Jackson Janes Research Director: Carl Lankowski Development Director: Laura Rheintgen Board of Trustees, Cochair: Steven Muller Board of Trustees, Cochair: Harry J. Gray The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. ©1999 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 0-941441-45-8 This AICGS Conference Report paper is made possible through grants from the German Program for Transatlantic Relations. Additional copies are available at $5.00 each to cover postage and processing from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Suite 420, 1400 16th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. -
BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2010
BOFIT BOFIT Weekly Yearbook 2010 Bank of Finland, BOFIT Institute for Economies in Transition BOFIT Weekly Editor-in-Chief Seija Lainela Bank of Finland BOFIT – Institute for Economies in Transition PO Box 160 FIN-00101 Helsinki Phone: +358 10 831 2268 Fax: +358 10 831 2294 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bof.fi/bofit The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Bank of Finland. BOFIT Weekly – Russia 2010 8.1.2010 BOFIT Weekly 1/2010 CBR lowers interest rates again, inflation rate slowing. Pensioners saw real increases even as wage growth stagnated in 2009. 15.1.2010 BOFIT Weekly 2/2010 Economy ministry says Russian GDP contracted 8.5 % last year. Economy ministry issues more upbeat 2010 forecast. 2009 federal budget deficit smaller than expected; 2010 budget outlook brightens. Moscow stock exchanges posted strong recovery last year. 22.1.2010 BOFIT Weekly 3/2010 Russia continued to manage trade and current account surpluses in 2009. Capital exports from Russia fell in 2009; capital inflows turned positive in the fourth quarter. Russia’s foreign indebtedness declined slightly in 2009. Plans to develop Russia’s Far East. 29.1.2010 BOFIT Weekly 4/2010 Reforms in the Russia’s banking sector. Birth pangs for new Russia-Belarus-Kazakhstan customs union. Russia and Belarus agree on oil supplies. 5.2.2010 BOFIT Weekly 5/2010 Especially fixed capital investment posts sharp drop last year. Grey economy slightly increases its contribution to GDP during the downturn. 12.2.2010 BOFIT Weekly 6/2010 Stimulus to continue this year. -
Miami1177598932.Pdf (567.64
MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School CERTIFICATE FOR APPROVING THE DISSERTATION We hereby approve the Dissertation Of Irina Aervitz Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Director (Dr. John M. Rothgeb) Reader (Dr. Walter Arnold) Reader (Dr. Venelin I. Ganev) Graduate School Representative (Dr. Margaret Ziolkowski) ABSTRACT THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THE AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR IN CHINA AND RUSSIA: THE ROLE OF THE STATE IN TECHNOLOGY APPROPRIATION by Irina Aervitz The focus of this study is automobile industry in China and Russia. Specifically I am looking at the state attempts to encourage technology development in the automobile sector. My goal is to look for variations in the overall policy environment created by the state with regard to technology enhancement in the automobile industry in China and Russia and particularly focus on policy implementations at the enterprise level by observing the way enterprises appropriate technology by using various sources of technology appropriation provided by the state policies. I believe that this research is important because it reviews the literature on the role of the state in industrial development and introduces the concept of “technology appropriation.” Technology appropriation lies in the heart of the companies’ technological competitiveness and is based on the sources of technology made available to companies by the regulatory environment created by the state. Most importantly, this project offers analysis of the empirical data collected during a series of interviews in the domestic and foreign enterprises operating in both countries. This analysis attempts to lift the “curtain” over the companies’ technology-oriented strategies and the way they take advantage of the existent state policies affecting the process of technology appropriation. -
Autobusiness N 138 Eng.Pdf
content Content Car Marke……………………………………………………………..……………………………………...………….. 3 Commercial Vehicles………………………………………...….……………………………………………………. 21 Foreign Investors: Business Organization in Russia ……………………………………………..…….……… 27 Auto component sector – no way out?………………………….……….………………………………………… 31 DMS: Auto Dealers’ Experience …………………………………………………………………………………….. 34 A Car on Demand …………………………………………………………………………………………………..…. 38 Power Plant ……………………………………………………………………....………………………...………….. 43 Model Highway Initiative ……………..…………………………………………………………………...………….. 43 Autobusiness [138] June 2013 | 2 first quarter results Car Market The car segment of the first quarter of 2013 is characterized by a pronounced stability of its indices. The production and sales growth was insignificant, in comparison with the first quarter of 2012. The increase in the share of foreign cars in the car production and sales structure also slowed down. Car Production Over the first three months of 2013, in Russia, 452.5 thousand cars were manufactured, which is only a 0.62% increase on the production result for the same period of 2012. Shares of Russian and foreign cars in the production structure also remained almost unchanged. In January-March 2013, 140.6 thousand cars of Russian brands were produced, which amounted to 31.07% of the total production volume. For comparison, In January-March 2012, their share was equal to 31.11%. Despite the total production volume stability, in the first quarter of 2013, the dynamics of cars, produced by various manufacturers, differed significantly. So, most enterprises, producing cars of Russian brands, showed the negative production dynamics. AVTOVAZ’s car production decreased by 4.63%, in particular, due to the assembly termination of Lada Kalina cars of the previous generation and preparation for the production of a new model of Kalina cars. The car production of Ulyanovsk Automobile Plant also decreased, by 14.1%. -
Russian Federation. Facilitating International Market Access For
OCCASION This publication has been made available to the public on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation. DISCLAIMER This document has been produced without formal United Nations editing. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries, or its economic system or degree of development. Designations such as “developed”, “industrialized” and “developing” are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of firm names or commercial products does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO. FAIR USE POLICY Any part of this publication may be quoted and referenced for educational and research purposes without additional permission from UNIDO. However, those who make use of quoting and referencing this publication are requested to follow the Fair Use Policy of giving due credit to UNIDO. CONTACT Please contact [email protected] for further information concerning UNIDO publications. For more information about UNIDO, please visit us at www.unido.org UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box -
Guide to Assembly Plants in Europe
Guide to assembly plants in Europe station wagon, S-class sedan and B Lieu Saint-Amand, France (Sevel 3 Ruesselsheim, Germany – hybrid, CL, CLS, SLS AMG; Nord: Fiat 50%, PSA 50%) – Opel/Vauxhall Insignia, KEY Maybach (ends 2013) Citroen C8, Jumpy/Dispatch; Fiat Opel/Vauxhall Astra 5 Ludwigsfelde, Germany – Mercedes Scudo, Scudo Panorama; Peugeot 4 Luton, UK – Opel/Vauxhall Vivaro; BMW GROUP Sprinter 807, Expert Renault Trafic II; Nissan Primastar (See also 2 , 20 ) 6 Hambach, France – Smart ForTwo; 5 Ellesmere Port, UK – Opel/Vauxhall 1 Dingolfing, Germany – BMW ForTwo Electric FORD Astra, AstraVan 5-series sedan, station wagon, M5 7 Vitoria, Spain – Mercedes Viano, (See also 7 ) 6 Zaragoza, Spain – Opel/Vauxhall station wagon, 5-series Gran Vito 1 Southampton, UK – Ford Transit Corsa, CorsaVan, Meriva, Combo Turismo, 6-series coupe, 8 Kecskemet, Hungary – Next 2 Cologne, Germany – Ford Fiesta, 7 Gliwice, Poland – Opel/Vauxhall convertible, M6 coupe, convertible, Mercedes A and B class Fusion Astra Classic and Notchback, Zafira 7-series sedan 3 Saarlouis, Germany – Ford Focus, 8 St. Petersburg, Russia – Chevrolet 2 Leipzig, Germany – BMW 1-series FIAT GROUP Focus ST, Focus Electric (2012) Captiva, Cruze; Opel Antara, Astra (3 door), coupe, convertible, i3 AUTOMOBILES first-generation Kuga A Togliatti, Russia (GM and AvtoVAZ (2013), i8 (2014), X1 (See also 33 , 34 , 35 , 45 ) 4 Genk, Belgium – Ford Mondeo, joint venture) – Chevrolet Niva, Viva 3 Munich, Germany – BMW 3-series 1 Cassino, Italy – Alfa Romeo Galaxy, S-Max sedan, station wagon -
Nr.89 (02.06 – 29.06)
Selected News 0 2 . 0 6 – 2 9 . 0 6 . 2 0 1 6 Me r c e de s -Benz has signed the agreement on the Greater Moscow plant for passenger cars 22.06.2016 / D e u t s c h e W e l l e G e r m a n automobile group Daimler will start the production of Mercedes - Benz passenger cars in Russia. The agreement on the arrangement of production in Moscow Region has been signed with Mercedes during the St. Petersburg International Economic For u m , told the deputy chairman of Moscow Region: German Elyanushkin on Wednesday the 22nd of June, as reported by Interfax. “In 2019, the year in which we hope to launch production, a new life environment will be created in Solnechnogorsk district” said Elyanushkin . E a r l i e r , the press office of Daimler had confirmed the negotiations with the Russian authorities to Deutsche W e l l e . According to Handelsblatt newspaper, 30,000 automobiles will be assembled at the Greater Moscow plant annually, using imported components. M e r c e d e s - B e n z is considering the 280 hectares E s i p o the Moscow Region, as written in V e d o m o s t i newspaper. The construction of the factory may start before the end of 2016, a c c o vo s i t e i n r d i n g to the information published. Av tov a z expands the model range of its assembly production in Kazakhstan 28.06.2016 / Lada.ru T h e first serial assemblies of Lada K a l i n a , Lada G r a n t a and the 5- d o o r L a d a 4 x 4 automobiles have rolled off the production line of Asia Auto. -
Auto Industry in Russia
Auto industry in Russia The automotive industry is one of the most socially important sectors of the Russian economy. All world car brands are presented in Russia. The largest companies are light vehicle producers AvtoVAZ and GAZ, while KAMAZ is the leading heavy vehicle producer. Foreign carmakers have production and construction plants in Russia. Table: TOP-10 CAR MANUFACTURERS IN RUSSIA Turnover, mlnRUB, № Name Region 2014 1 LLC Volkswagen Group Rus Kaluga Oblast 230 583 INN 5042059767 OJC AutoVAZ 2 Samara Oblast 189 370 INN 6320002223 LLC Nissan Manufacturing Rus 3 Saint-Petersburg 152 033 INN 7842337791 CJC Renault Russia 4 Moscow 110 592 INN 7709259743 PAO KamAZ Republic of 5 104 389 INN 1650032058 Tatarstan LLC Ellada Intertrade 6 Kaliningrad Oblast 91 640 INN 3906072056 LLC Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Rus 7 Saint-Petersburg 85 392 INN 7801463902 LLC Automobile Plant Gaz Nizhny Novgorod 8 59 278 INN 5250018433 Oblast LLC Ford Sollers Holding Republic of 9 54 888 INN 1646021952 Tatarstan CJC Autotor 10 Kaliningrad Oblast 40 967 INN 3905011678 Thai Trade Center-Moscow, Department of International Trade Promotion LIGHT VEHICLE The light vehicle market shows the leading positions of passenger cars from Japan. There are 6.69 million of these vehicles. They occupy about a half (45.7%) of the foreign car park. Then go European cars with 3.92 million units. Currently, over a quarter (26.8%) of the foreign car park belongs to them, but they are losing their share every year, mostly due to the increment of the American (13.7%) and Korean (12.5%) cars, whose aggregate number is comparable to the “Europeans” (3.83 million units). -
El Mercado De Componentes De Automoción En La Federación Rusa
Oficina Económica y Comercial de la Embajada de España en Moscú El mercado de componentes de automoción en la Federación Rusa Estudios de Mercado Mercado de Estudios El mercado de componentes de automoción en la Federación Rusa Este estudio ha sido realizado por la Oficina Económica y Comercial de la Embajada de España en Moscú Estudios de Mercado Mercado de Estudios Junio de 2009 EL MERCADO DE EQUIPOS, COMPONENTES Y ACCESORIOS DE AUTOMOCIÓN EN LA FEDERACIÓN RUSA I. INTRODUCCIÓN 6 1.1.1. Definición y características del sector y subsectores relacionados 6 II. ANÁLISIS DE LA OFERTA 9 1.1.1. Análisis cuantitativo 9 1.1. Tamaño de la oferta 9 1.2. Análisis de los componentes de la oferta 22 2.2.2. Análisis cualitativo 26 2.1. Producción 27 2.2. Obstáculos comerciales 57 III. ANÁLISIS DEL COMERCIO 61 1.1.1. Análisis cuantitativo 61 1.1. Canales de distribución 61 1.2. Esquema de importación 64 1.3. Principales distribuidores 65 2.2.2. Análisis cualitativo 66 2.1. Estrategias de canal 66 2.2. Estrategias para el contacto comercial 66 2.3. Condiciones de acceso 67 2.4. Condiciones de suministro 67 2.5. Promoción y publicidad 67 2.6. Tendencias de la distribución 68 IV. ANÁLISIS DE LA DEMANDA 69 1.1.1. Evaluación del volumen de la demanda 69 1.1. Crecimiento esperado 69 1.2. Tendencias industriales 70 1.3. Tendencias tecnológicas 71 1.4. Tendencias medioambientales 71 2.2.2. Estructura del mercado 71 3.3.3. Factores asociados a la decisión de compra 72 4.4.4. -
Guide to Assembly Plants in Europe
AN_071112_16_17.qxd 3/13/08 4:11 PM Page 16 PAGE 16 · www.autonew seurope.com November 12, 2007 Guide to assembly plants in Europe BMW GROUP A San Benedetto Val di Sangro, Italy (Sevel Sud: Fiat 50%, (2008). Note: GM has temporary plant on site until 4 Flins, France – Renault Clio III, Clio II (See also 3 , 25 ) PSA 50%) – Citroen Jumper/Relay; Fiat Ducato; permanent plant opens in 2008. 5 Maubeuge, France – Passenger cars: Kangoo, new 1 Dingolfing, Germany – BMW 5-series sedan, station Peugeot Boxer 11 Asaka, Uzbekistan (UzDaewoo: joint venture of GM, Kangoo; LCV: new Kangoo Express, new Kangoo Express wagon, 6-series coupe, convertible, 7-series sedan, B Lieu Saint-Amand, France (Sevel Nord: Fiat 50%, PSA GM Daewoo and Uzautosanoat) – Daewoo Tico, Matiz, Compact; Nissan Kubistar M5 sedan, station wagon, M6 coupe, convertible 50%) – Citroen Atlante/C8, Dispatch/Jumpy; Fiat Scudo, Damas, Nexia, Lacetti; (from kits** starting in 2008) 6 Sandouville, France – Renault Laguna III Sport Tourer and 2 Leipzig, Germany – BMW 1-series 3 door, coupe, Scudo Panorama, Ulysse; Lancia Phedra; Peugeot 807, Chevrolet Epica, Tacuma, Captiva hatchback, Espace IV, Vel Satis convertible, 3-series sedan Expert, TePee A Togliatti, Russia (joint venture of GM and AvtoVAZ) – 7 Palencia, Spain – Renault Megane II hatchback, sport 3 Munich, Germany – BMW 3-series sedan, station wagon Chevrolet Niva, Viva; Opel car (2008) hatch, sport station wagon 4 Regensburg, Germany – BMW 1-series 5 door, 3-series FORD B Warsaw, Poland (FSO: UkrAvto 60%, GM Daewoo 40%) – 8 Valladolid,