DOCSLIB.ORG

Inside IP Venner Shipley’S Intellectual Property Magazine Autumn/Winter 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inside IP Venner Shipley’S Intellectual Property Magazine Autumn/Winter 2019 Inside IP www.vennershipley.co.uk Venner Shipley’s Intellectual Property Magazine Autumn/Winter 2019 G1/19: Just what do those questions mean? PAGE 12 What's in the Patent Box for Implications of the UK 100 Engineering Ideas That SMEs? General Election on Brexit Have Changed The World PAGE 10 PAGE 24 PAGE 30 European Intellectual Property Attorneys 1 What’s inside? Page 4 AI Inventorship Page 19 New Year, New Rules: Richard Kennedy and Joel Moss explore if an invention Changes to the Rules of Procedure of is created by an AI, should the AI be named as the the EPO Boards of Appeal January inventor? 2020 Tim Russell looks to 1 January 2020 when new Rules Page 5 MONOPOLY: Trade Mark of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO come Edition into force. Camilla Sexton highlights the recent case of Hasbro, which had one of its EU trade mark registrations for Page 22 Integrated Circuits MONOPOLY struck out in part. To celebrate the 60th anniversary of the invention of the integrated circuit, Rob Cork looks back on the Page 6 Protecting a New Medical Use pioneering work of two US inventors, Jack Kilby and Robert Noyce, whose research paved the way for of a Known Substance virtually all modern electronic devices. Catrin Petty looks at how patent protection can be pursued for a new medical use of a known substance in five key jurisdictions. Page 24 Implications of the UK General Election on Brexit Page 8 Effective Use of Outsourcing We provide an insight into the implications of the UK General Election on Brexit. for Developing Patent Portfolios Based on his experiences, Gary Whiting highlights how in-house departments can make effective use of Page 25 Design Protection of outsourcing when developing patent portfolios. Graphical User Interfaces We continue our series of articles on GUIs. George Page 10 What's in the Patent Box for Hudson explores the extent to which GUIs can be protected under the various design law systems SMEs? covering the UK. Ian Grey provides an update on the UK tax incentive scheme, Patent Box. Page 28 Sound Marks Page 12 G1/19: Just What do Those David Birchall highlights the topic of sound trade Questions Mean? marks. Pawel Piotrowicz has been at the forefront of developing EPO law regarding computer-implemented Page 30 100 Engineering Ideas That inventions following the EPO Board of Appeal referring questions to the EBA on G1/19. In this issue Have Changed The World Pawel discusses the referral and highlights the wider We continue our series of articles, where we look implications for the patentability of simulations at some of the greatest engineering ideas that have surrounding the decision. had an effect on our everyday lives. The list of 100 engineering ideas was compiled by The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET). Page 16 Designing for Compliance – Data Protection Considerations in the Page 34 Venner Shipley News Development of Artificial Intelligence A round up of the latest Venner Shipley news. Robert Peake and Ronique Hossain explore how the application of AI, and ML, to support decision making and accelerate innovation has experienced exponential growth in recent years. 2 www.vennershipley.co.uk A word from the editor European patent practice is heavily influenced by the case law of the Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Office (EPO). Every year there are hundreds of decisions made by the EPO Boards of Appeal, but decisions of the Enlarged Board (which carry the greatest weight) are much rarer, with only two or three cases being referred a year. Regarding computer implemented inventions, there have been well over a thousand Boards of Appeal decisions about what is patentable, but no Enlarged Board has fully wrestled with the issue. This will change with Enlarged Board case G1/19, which is the subject of our cover article. This case is being handled by Venner Shipley’s Pawel Piotrowicz, and Pawel provides an overview of this very important European patent matter on pages 12 to 15. On the subject of the EPO Boards of Appeal, the Rules of Procedure of the Boards of Appeal undergo some important changes on 1 January 2020, and appeals expert Tim Russell provides a detailed overview of the changes on pages 19 to 21. It will not be a surprise to many that there has been a huge growth in the filing of patents related to AI technology, and Richard Kennedy and Joel Moss discuss on page 4 the issue of whether an AI can be considered to be an inventor of a patent, with reference to a test case that is being processed by various patent offices. In addition, Robert Peake and Ronique Hossain discuss data protection considerations in the development of AI on pages 16 to 18. Before joining Venner Shipley, Gary Whiting gained extensive experience as an in-house patent attorney. On pages 8 and 9, Gary draws upon this experience to discuss effective use of outsourcing for developing patent portfolios. The UK has a tax incentive scheme called Patent Box, which enables companies to benefit from a reduced rate of corporation tax for the profits derived from innovative products and processes protected by a qualifying IP right. Ian Grey provides an update on this scheme on pages 10 and 11. As part of our series of articles relating to graphical user interfaces, George Hudson provides an overview of how design protection can be used to protect graphical user interfaces on pages 25 to 27. Regarding trade marks, David Birchall discusses issues related to sound trade marks on pages 28 and 29, and on page 5 Camilla Sexton provides an interesting summary of a recent decision relating to bad faith concerning a trade mark for MONOPOLY. Also, Jan Walaski and David Birchall provide an insight into the implications of the UK General Election on Brexit. As a final point, I am very pleased to note that Venner Shipley has been recognised by Legal 500 UK as a Tier 1 firm for PATMA: Patent Attorneys. This recognition means a lot to us, and is the result of the hard work of all of our attorneys and the wider Venner Shipley team. Simon Taor Partner, Patent Attorney About Venner Shipley: Venner Shipley is a leading firm firm with a long history and a of European intellectual property vast amount of experience in attorneys and lawyers. We are relation to all aspects of patents, a modern forward-thinking trade marks and IP law. 3 AI Inventorship For a patent application, there is a requirement to name the inventors. While there have been many disputes as to who should be considered the inventor of a given invention, the requirement to name inventors was, until recently, considered to be uncontroversial. The continued rise of artificial intelligence has changed this. If an invention is created by an AI, should the AI be named as the inventor? Should inventions created solely by AI be patentable at all? In a test case for these issues, a team inventions, DABUS was not merely manual to expressly indicate that “an led by Professor Ryan Abbott at the used as a tool by a human inventor ‘AI Inventor’ is not acceptable as this University of Surrey has filed several but instead independently conceived does not identify ‘a person’ which is patent applications for inventions the inventions and identified their required by law” giving an indication which they claim were invented by salience. The team’s view is that as to how the UK IPO is likely to react an AI named DABUS (Device for the DABUS should be considered to be to the inventions allegedly invented Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified the inventor and that there is no by DABUS. Nevertheless, the pace Sentience). The inventions in question appropriate human inventor to name of development of AI is rapid and are a ‘Fractal Container’ and a ‘Neural in the patent applications. unpredictable, and Ryan Abbott’s Flame’. team is of the view that DABUS is However, the notion that an AI (or already capable of independent indeed any computer software) creation without the involvement of could be named as an inventor on a a human inventor. While views differ, patent conflicts with several existing the issues go beyond mere academic provisions in patent law, and with enquiry, or the formality of what the common understanding that name to include on a form - in the the inventor should be a person. United States in particular, failure to For example, the UK Patents Act and name the correct inventors can lead the European Patent Convention to a patent being held unenforceable. provide certain rights to inventors, The questions around AI inventorship including the right to be mentioned thus represent an emerging challenge Architecture of the DABUS Artificial Intelligence in an application or patent. Rights for the patent system which has yet to to appropriate compensation, at be resolved. Patent applications to both of these least for some inventions, also exist inventions have been filed with the UK in some jurisdictions. These and Venner Shipley has extensive AI IPO, USPTO and EPO. PCT applications other provisions of patent law do expertise with the largest dedicated AI to these inventions have also been not mesh well with the concept of AI team in the UK. Members of our team filed. The 'Fractal Container' patent inventorship. have postgraduate qualifications in AI application relates to a container Neural Flame and have given presentations on the having a wall with a fractal profile. The patentability of AI at various major fractal profile enables the coupling of IP conferences.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • APS News November 2019, Vol. 28, No. 10
    Professional The Optics of Topical Group on Back Page: Physics Education 02│ Skills Seminar 03│ Augmented Reality 05│ Data Science 08│ in Texas November 2019 • Vol. 28, No. 10 aps.org/apsnews A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY HONORS OUTREACH 2019 Nobel Prize in Physics Evaluating a Decade of BY LEAH POFFENBERGER PhysicsQuest BY LEAH POFFENBERGER he Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has announced the or the past 10 years, middle winners of the 2019 Nobel T school classrooms all Prize in Physics, recognizing both theoretical and experimental F across the country have contributions to understanding had a chance to learn physics the universe. This year, the prize with hands-on demos thanks to is awarded to APS Fellow James the APS PhysicsQuest program. Peebles (Princeton University), PhysicsQuest distributes kits Michel Mayor (University of packed with experiment demos, Geneva), and Didier Queloz comic books, and a teacher’s guide (University of Geneva; University in hopes of inspiring students to of Cambridge). be more interested in physics. In New physics laureates (L-R): Didier Queloz, Michel Mayor, James Peebles Half of the prize is awarded the 2018-2019 school year alone, IMAGE: NOBEL FOUNDATION PhysicsQuest reached nearly to Peebles for his theoretical This year’s PhysicsQuest kits focus insights into physical cosmology Nobel Laureate David Gross. “Jim and measure the properties of the 184,000 students taught by more on the achievements of physicist that have impacted the trajec- is among the fathers of physical universe.” than 5,000 teachers. Chien-Shiung Wu. tory of cosmology research for cosmology that laid the foundation Peebles receives the Nobel Prize This year, APS commissioned good timing,” says James Roche, the past 50 years and form the for the now remarkably successful for his decoding of the cosmic an evaluation report of the Outreach Programs Manager basis of the current ideas about standard theory of the structure microwave background, left behind PhysicsQuest program to assess its at APS.
    [Show full text]
  • ECE Illinois WINTER2005.Indd
    Electrical and Computer Engineering Alumni News ECE Alumni Association newsletter University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Winter 2005-2006 Jack Kilby, 1923–2005 Volume XL Cancer claims Nobel laureate, ECE alumnus By Laura Schmitt and Jamie Hutchinson Inside this issue Microchip inventor and Nobel physics laureate DEPARTMENT HEAD’S Jack Kilby (BSEE ’47) died from cancer on MESSAGE June 22, 2005. He was 81. Kilby received the 2000 Nobel Prize in 2 Physics on December 10, 2001, in an award ceremony in Stockholm, Sweden. Kilby was ROOM-TEMPERATURE LASER recognized for his part in the invention and 4 development of the integrated circuit, which he first demonstrated on September 12, 1958, while at Texas Instruments. At the Nobel awards ceremony, Royal Swedish Academy member Tord Claesen called that date “one of the most important birth dates in the history of technology.” A measure of Kilby’s importance can be seen in the praise that was lavished on him in death. Lengthy obituaries appeared in engi- Jack Kilby neering and science trade publications as well FEATURED ALUMNI CAREERS as in major newspapers worldwide, including where his interest in electricity and electron- the New York Times, Financial Times, and The ics blossomed at an early age. His father ran a 29 Economist. On June 24, ABC News honored power company that served a wide area in rural Kilby by naming him its Person of the Week. Kansas, and he used amateur radio to keep in Reporter Elizabeth Vargas introduced the contact with customers during emergencies. segment by noting that Kilby’s invention During an ice storm, the teenage Kilby saw “had a direct effect on billions of people in the firsthand how electronic technology could world,” despite his relative anonymity among positively impact people’s lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 100 Global Innovators 2021 10-Year Anniversary
    Top 100 Global Innovators 2021 10-year anniversary edition Celebrating 10 years of Top 100 Global Innovators Contents 06 Foreword 09 A habit for the new 10 Creating the list 12 Top 100 Global Innovators 2021 18 One year on 24 The hidden value of innovation culture 26 An ideation keel 3 Break– out 4 29 that have led the way. These 29 companies have appeared in the Top 100 Global Innovators list every single year since its inception a decade ago. With an average age of a century, the foundational stories of these firms and the themes they teach, endure and resonate today. Company history information was sourced from publicly available web records, including company websites, and best efforts were made to share with organizations for veracity. Break– 1665 — Saint-Gobain In October 1665, King Louis 14th of France granted a charter to minister Jean-Baptiste Colbert for a new glass and mirror making company, the Royal Mirror Glass Factory. With glassmaking expertise in the 17th century monopolized by Venice, the new company brought valuable Venetian glass makers, and their rare knowledge, across the Alps. After 365 years of prosperity and expansion with orders from the royal household (including the Hall of Mirrors at Versailles), today Saint-Gobain is a out global supplier and innovator of high- performance and sustainable materials (including glass) across a broad range of industries including construction, mobility, health and manufacturing. 1875 — Toshiba In 1875 Hisashige Tanaka opened Tanaka Engineering Works in Tokyo, manufacturing telegraphic equipment. Five years later, Ichisuke Fujioka established Hakunetsu-sha & Company, with a focus on developing the first Japanese-designed electric lamps.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of MIT
    Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT Edward B. Roberts and Charles Eesley MIT Sloan School of Management February 2009 © 2009 by Edward B. Roberts. All rights reserved. ENTREPRENEURIAL IMPACT: THE ROLE OF MIT Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT Edward B. Roberts and Charles Eesley Edward B. Roberts is the David Sarnoff Professor of Management of Technology, MIT Sloan School of Management, and founder/chair of the MIT Entrepreneurship Center, which is sponsored in part by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. Charles Eesley is a doctoral candidate in the Technological Innovation & Entrepreneurship Group at the MIT Sloan School of Management and the recipient of a Kauffman Dissertation Fellowship. We thank MIT, the MIT Entrepreneurship Center, the Kauffman Foundation, and Gideon Gartner for their generous support of our research. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation or MIT. Any mistakes are the authors’. ENTREPRENEURIAL IMPACT: THE ROLE OF MIT 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary................................................................................................................................4 Economic Impact of MIT Alumni Entrepreneurs......................................................................................4 The Types of Companies MIT Graduates Create......................................................................................5 The MIT Entrepreneurial Ecosystem ........................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Fpgas As Components in Heterogeneous HPC Systems: Raising the Abstraction Level of Heterogeneous Programming
    FPGAs as Components in Heterogeneous HPC Systems: Raising the Abstraction Level of Heterogeneous Programming Wim Vanderbauwhede School of Computing Science University of Glasgow A trip down memory lane 80 Years ago: The Theory Turing, Alan Mathison. "On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem." J. of Math 58, no. 345-363 (1936): 5. 1936: Universal machine (Alan Turing) 1936: Lambda calculus (Alonzo Church) 1936: Stored-program concept (Konrad Zuse) 1937: Church-Turing thesis 1945: The Von Neumann architecture Church, Alonzo. "A set of postulates for the foundation of logic." Annals of mathematics (1932): 346-366. 60-40 Years ago: The Foundations The first working integrated circuit, 1958. © Texas Instruments. 1957: Fortran, John Backus, IBM 1958: First IC, Jack Kilby, Texas Instruments 1965: Moore’s law 1971: First microprocessor, Texas Instruments 1972: C, Dennis Ritchie, Bell Labs 1977: Fortran-77 1977: von Neumann bottleneck, John Backus 30 Years ago: HDLs and FPGAs Algotronix CAL1024 FPGA, 1989. © Algotronix 1984: Verilog 1984: First reprogrammable logic device, Altera 1985: First FPGA,Xilinx 1987: VHDL Standard IEEE 1076-1987 1989: Algotronix CAL1024, the first FPGA to offer random access to its control memory 20 Years ago: High-level Synthesis Page, Ian. "Closing the gap between hardware and software: hardware-software cosynthesis at Oxford." (1996): 2-2. 1996: Handel-C, Oxford University 2001: Mitrion-C, Mitrionics 2003: Bluespec, MIT 2003: MaxJ, Maxeler Technologies 2003: Impulse-C, Impulse Accelerated
    [Show full text]
  • Division of Research and Economic Development
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Reports (Research and Economic Development) Division of Research and Economic Development 2012 Division of Research and Economic Development Annual Report for FY2012 URI Division of Research and Economic Development Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/researchecondev_reports Recommended Citation URI Division of Research and Economic Development, "Division of Research and Economic Development Annual Report for FY2012" (2012). Reports (Research and Economic Development). Paper 7. http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/researchecondev_reports/7http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/researchecondev_reports/7 This Annual Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Division of Research and Economic Development at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Reports (Research and Economic Development) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Annual Report FY2012 PROPOSALS SUBMITTED through the Division of Research and Economic Development FY2012 Number of Proposals Dollar Amount 654 $299,726,030 AWARDS RECEIVED through the Division of Research and Economic Development FY2012 Type of Awards Dollar Amount Awards received through the Division of Research and Economic Development $95,004,749 Research-related awards through the URI Foundation $2,297,509 Research-related activity through the URI Research Foundation $343,245 Vice President for Research and Economic Development Support $506,998
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Inventors and Innovators Fourth Grade
    Kansas Inventors and Innovators Fourth Grade Developed for Kansas Historical Society at the Library of Congress, Midwest Region Workshop “It’s Elementary: Teaching with Primary Sources” 2012 Terry Healy Woodrow Wilson School, USD 383, Manhattan Overview This lesson is designed to teach students about inventors and innovators of Kansas. Students will read primary sources about Jack St. Clair Kilby, Clyde Tombaugh, George Washington Carver, and Walter P. Chrysler. Students will use a document analysis sheet to record information before developing a Kansas Innovator card. Standards History: Benchmark 1, Indicator 1 The student researches the contributions made by notable Kansans in history. Benchmark 4, Indicator 4 The student identifies and compares information from primary and secondary sources (e.g., photographs, diaries/journals, newspapers, historical maps). Common Core ELA Reading: Benchmark RI.4.9 The student integrates information from two texts on the same topic in order to write or speak about the subject knowledgably. Benchmark RI.4.10. By the end of year, read and comprehend informational texts, including history/social studies, science, and technical texts, in the grades 4–5 text complexity band proficiently, with scaffolding as needed at the high end of the range. Objectives Content The student will summarize and present information about a Kansas inventor/innovator. 1 Skills The student will analyze and summarize primary and secondary sources to draw conclusions. Essential Questions How do we know about past inventions and innovations? What might inspire or spark the creation of an invention or innovation? How do new inventions or innovations impact our lives? Resource Table Image Description Citation URL Photograph of Jack Photograph of Jack http://kshs.org/kans Kilby (Handout 1) Kilby, Kansapedia, apedia/jack-st-clair- from Texas Kansas Historical kilby/12125 Instruments Society (Topeka, Kansas) Photo originally from Texas Instruments.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Jack Kilby, Manuscript
    Guide to the Jack Kilby, Manuscript NMAH.AC.0798 NMAH Staff Archives Center, National Museum of American History P.O. Box 37012 Suite 1100, MRC 601 Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected] http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Scope and Contents note................................................................................................ 2 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 2 Biographical/Historical note.............................................................................................. 1 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 2 Container Listing ...................................................................................................... Jack Kilby, Manuscript NMAH.AC.0798 Collection Overview Repository: Archives Center, National Museum of American History Title: Jack Kilby, Manuscript Identifier: NMAH.AC.0798 Date: 1951. Creator: Johnson Controls. (5757 North Green Bay Avenue, Glendale, Illinois 53209) Kilby, Jack Extent: 0.05 Cubic feet (1 folder) Language: English . Administrative Information Immediate Source of Acquisiton Collection donated by Jack Kilby and
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Noyce Papers
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3m3nc61v No online items Guide to the Robert Noyce Papers Colyn Wohlmut Department of Special Collections Green Library Stanford University Libraries Stanford, CA 94305-6004 Phone: (650) 725-1022 Email: [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc/ © 2006 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Guide to the Robert Noyce Papers M1490 1 Guide to the Robert Noyce Papers Collection number: M1490 Department of Special Collections and University Archives Stanford University Libraries Stanford, California Processed by: Colyn Wohlmut Date Completed: December 2005 Encoded by: Bill O'Hanlon © 2006 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Robert Noyce papers Dates: ca. 1948-1990 Collection number: M1490 Creator: Noyce, Robert N., 1927- Collection Size: 11 linear ft. (19 manuscript boxes and 3 oversize boxes) Repository: Stanford University. Libraries. Dept. of Special Collections and University Archives. Abstract: Collection contains documents, photographs, videotape, and audio tape (reel to reel). Languages: Languages represented in the collection: English Access Collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least 24 hours in advance of intended use. Requests for electronic media (audio and video tape, disks, etc.) will require a review before patron use; please refer to http://www-sul.stanford.edu/depts/spc/emedia/access.html for complete policy statement. Publication Rights Property rights reside with the repository. Literary rights reside with the creators of the documents or their heirs. To obtain permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Public Services Librarian of the Dept. of Special Collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Matse Alumni News/Winter 2005 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Contents 3 Message from the Department Head
    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN Mat SE Department of Materials Science and Illinois Engineering WINTER 2005 ALUMNI NEWS New diffraction techniques improve sensitivity to small structures John Rogers listed in 2005 Scientific American 50 MatSE Alumni News/Winter 2005 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1 Contents 3 Message from the Department Head 4 Electron nanodiffraction techniques reveal new structures 5 Alumni awards 6 Awards banquet 6 7-8 Student awards 9 New faculty: Jianjun Cheng 10 Nestor Zaluzec honored by College 11-13 FY05 donors recognized 14 In memoriam: Earl Eckel 7 15 Where are our alumni? 16 Department notes 17 John Rogers in the 2005 Scientifi c American 50 18 Obituaries 19 Class notes 19 20 Flashback Published twice annually by the University of Illinois Department of Materials Science and Engineering for its alumni, faculty and friends. All ideas expressed in Materials Science & Engineering Alumni News are those of the authors or editor and do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial position of either the alumni or the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois. On the Cover Correspondence concerning the MatSE Department Head Alumni News should be sent to: Ian Robertson The development and understanding of nanomaterials for nanotechnology rely critically on high-resolution The Editor structural characterization of individual nanostruc- MatSE Alumni News Associate Heads tures. Structure characterization tools, such as diffrac- 201B MSEB Phil Geil, Angus Rockett tion, need to be developed and adapted to nanoscale re- 1304 West Green Street quirements. The image on the cover shows single-wall Urbana, IL 61801 Assistant to the Head carbon nanotube bundles from NASA Johnson Space Jay Menacher Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Liste Der Nobelpreisträger
    Physiologie Wirtschafts- Jahr Physik Chemie oder Literatur Frieden wissenschaften Medizin Wilhelm Henry Dunant Jacobus H. Emil von Sully 1901 Conrad — van ’t Hoff Behring Prudhomme Röntgen Frédéric Passy Hendrik Antoon Theodor Élie Ducommun 1902 Emil Fischer Ronald Ross — Lorentz Mommsen Pieter Zeeman Albert Gobat Henri Becquerel Svante Niels Ryberg Bjørnstjerne 1903 William Randal Cremer — Pierre Curie Arrhenius Finsen Bjørnson Marie Curie Frédéric John William William Mistral 1904 Iwan Pawlow Institut de Droit international — Strutt Ramsay José Echegaray Adolf von Henryk 1905 Philipp Lenard Robert Koch Bertha von Suttner — Baeyer Sienkiewicz Camillo Golgi Joseph John Giosuè 1906 Henri Moissan Theodore Roosevelt — Thomson Santiago Carducci Ramón y Cajal Albert A. Alphonse Rudyard \Ernesto Teodoro Moneta 1907 Eduard Buchner — Michelson Laveran Kipling Louis Renault Ilja Gabriel Ernest Rudolf Klas Pontus Arnoldson 1908 Metschnikow — Lippmann Rutherford Eucken Paul Ehrlich Fredrik Bajer Theodor Auguste Beernaert Guglielmo Wilhelm Kocher Selma 1909 — Marconi Ostwald Ferdinand Lagerlöf Paul Henri d’Estournelles de Braun Constant Johannes Albrecht Ständiges Internationales 1910 Diderik van Otto Wallach Paul Heyse — Kossel Friedensbüro der Waals Allvar Maurice Tobias Asser 1911 Wilhelm Wien Marie Curie — Gullstrand Maeterlinck Alfred Fried Victor Grignard Gerhart 1912 Gustaf Dalén Alexis Carrel Elihu Root — Paul Sabatier Hauptmann Heike Charles Rabindranath 1913 Kamerlingh Alfred Werner Henri La Fontaine — Robert Richet Tagore Onnes Theodore
    [Show full text]
  • HOW DID SILICON VALLEY BECOME SILICON VALLEY? Three Surprising Lessons for Other Cities and Regions
    HOW DID SILICON VALLEY BECOME SILICON VALLEY? Three Surprising Lessons for Other Cities and Regions a report from: supported by: 2 / How Silicon Valley Became "Silicon Valley" This report was created by Rhett Morris and Mariana Penido. They wish to thank Jona Afezolli, Fernando Fabre, Mike Goodwin, Matt Lerner, and Han Sun who provided critical assistance and input. For additional information on this research, please contact Rhett Morris at [email protected]. How Silicon Valley Became "Silicon Valley" / 3 INTRODUCTION THE JOURNALIST Don Hoefler coined the York in the chip industry.4 No one expected the term “Silicon Valley” in a 1971 article about region to become a hub for these technology computer chip companies in the San Francisco companies. Bay Area.1 At that time, the region was home to Silicon Valley’s rapid development offers many prominent chip businesses, such as Intel good news to other cities and regions. This and AMD. All of these companies used silicon report will share the story of its creation and to manufacture their chips and were located in analyze the steps that enabled it to grow. While a farming valley south of the city. Hoefler com- it is impossible to replicate the exact events that bined these two facts to create a new name for established this region 50 years ago, the devel- the area that highlighted the success of these opment of Silicon Valley can provide insights chip businesses. to leaders in communities across the world. Its Silicon Valley is now the most famous story illustrates three important lessons for cul- technology hub in the world, but it was a very tivating high-growth companies and industries: different place before these businesses devel- oped.
    [Show full text]