DOCSLIB.ORG

Morphology of Modern Arrowhead Tips on Human Skin Analog*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

J Forensic Sci, January 2018, Vol. 63, No. 1 doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13502 PAPER Available online at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com PATHOLOGY/BIOLOGY LokMan Sung,1,2 M.D.; Kilak Kesha,3 M.D.; Jeffrey Hudson,4,5 M.D.; Kelly Root,1 and Leigh Hlavaty,1,2 M.D. Morphology of Modern Arrowhead Tips on Human Skin Analog* ABSTRACT: Archery has experienced a recent resurgence in participation and has seen increases in archery range attendance and in chil- dren and young adults seeking archery lessons. Popular literature and movies prominently feature protagonists well versed in this form of weap- onry. Periodic homicide cases in the United States involving bows are reported, and despite this and the current interest in the field, there are no manuscripts published on a large series of arrow wounds. This experiment utilizes a broad selection of modern arrowheads to create wounds for comparison. While general appearances mimicked the arrowhead shape, details such as the presence of abrasions were greatly influenced by the design of the arrowhead tip. Additionally, in the absence of projectiles or available history, arrowhead injuries can mimic other instruments causing penetrating wounds. A published resource on arrowhead injuries would allow differentiation of causes of injury by forensic scientists. KEYWORDS: forensic science, forensic pathology, compound bow, arrow, broadhead, morphology Archery, defined as the art, practice, and skill of shooting arrows While investigations into the penetrating ability of arrows with a bow, is indelibly entwined in human history. Accounts of have been published (5), this article is the first large-scale study the bow and arrow can be chronicled throughout human civiliza- evaluating the cutaneous morphology of modern broadhead tion from its origins as a primary hunting tool, migration to utiliza- arrow tip injuries in a controlled environment. It will service as tion in combat, and to its ancient and current day use in a reference and primer for medical examiners and coroners to competitive sport and recreational activities. As depicted in Pale- formulate their opinions and lend support in trial. olithic and early Mesolithic hieroglyphs, the bow is one of the ’ world s oldest weapons (1). While people around the world Materials and Methods employed these implements, they have all but been rendered obso- lete in contemporary warfare by the advancement of firearms (2). Broadheads are arrowheads that have sharpened edges or Despite its ancient pedigree in weaponry and sport, little docu- blades used for incising tissue. Terms used in this article to mentation on arrowhead injuries in forensic literature exists. In describe the characteristics of the broadheads include the tip, current society, very few instances of homicides involve the bow blade, width, and grains. The tip refers the very end of the and arrow, and when the arrow remains within the body, doubt broadhead and is the first portion that contacts the target. Arrow- as to the weapon used is eliminated (3). However, many modern head blades are their cutting edges. The width describes the compound bows are able to propel arrows with sufficient veloc- maximum spread or separation of the blades from one another. ity and energy needed to pass completely through a game ani- Grains are used to measure the mass of the broadhead, and one mal’s body with ease (4) and they would likely behave similarly grain is nearly 64.8 mg. in humans. In these instances, those who are unfamiliar with the There are multiple methods of organizing arrowheads configuration of modern arrowheads have few published (Table 1). One method of categorization is by having one group resources from which to draw. consisting of cutting blades that are fixed or nonmoving and a second group with mechanical blades where the cutting edges deploy upon striking or entering the target (Fig. 1). A second 1Wayne County Medical Examiner’s Office, 1300 E. Warren Ave., system of division is according to the number of major blades Detroit, MI, 48207. 2 the arrowhead contains. Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Cen- In this study, the selection of arrowheads included one field ter Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109. 3Department of Forensic Pathology, National Forensic Pathology Service point (Fig. 2), 12 commonly used broadheads, and six variant- of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand. design broadhead arrowheads. The two-blade broadheads 4Lucas County Coroner’s Office, Toledo, OH. included the Carbon Expressâ NativTM, Magnusâ StingerTM 2 5 Department of Pathology, University of Toledo Health Sciences Campus, blade, G5â HavocTM, Rageâ X-TremeTM, and the Swhackerâ 2280 Dowling Hall, MS 1090, Toledo, OH, 43614. (Figs 3 and 4). Standard three-blade broadhead arrowheads were *Supported by a grant from the University of Michigan, Department of TM TM TM Pathology AP Project Funding Committee Project #64. the G5â Montec , Muzzyâ Trocar , Rageâ Kore , Spitfireâ TM TM TM Received 5 Dec. 2016; and in revised form 5 Jan. 2017; accepted 6 Mar. Maxx ,G5â T3 , and the Grim Reaperâ Razortip (Figs 5 2017. and 6). The Magnusâ Stinger BuzzcutTM 4 blade was the only 140 © 2017 American Academy of Forensic Sciences SUNG ET AL. MORPHOLOGY OF MORDERN ARROWHEAD TIPS 141 TABLE 1––Arrowhead summary. Blades Fixed or Brand Model Number Mechanical Allen Field point None Carbon Expressâ NativTM 2 Fixed Magnusâ StingerTM 2 Fixed G5â HavocTM 2 Mechanical Rageâ X-TremeTM 2 Mechanical Swhackerâ 2 Mechanical G5â MontecTM 3 Fixed Muzzyâ TrocarTM 3 Fixed Rageâ KoreTM 3 Mechanical Spitfireâ MaxxTM 3 Mechanical G5â T3TM 3 Mechanical Grim Reaperâ RazortipTM 3 Mechanical Magnusâ Stinger BuzzcutTM 4 Fixed FIG. 2––Field point arrowhead. Scale in inches. Flying Arrow Archeryâ CycloneTM 3 Fixed Flying Arrow Archeryâ ToxicTM 3 Fixed Outdoor Sports Productsâ SaberMaxxTM Fixed similarities of porcine skin to human skin in relation to their Muzzyâ Small game point None anatomic, physiologic, histologic, histochemical, and immunohis- Flying Arrow Archeryâ CycloneTM 3 Fixed tochemical properties (6). With these parallels, it was determined Trophy Ridgeâ BuckblasterTM 6 Fixed and that slaughtered pigs would serve as an appropriate human ana- Mechanical log. The carcasses were suspended from a metal frame by the legs to present the full lateral side of the animal for maximiza- four-blade broadhead tested (Fig. 7). Variant broadheads tion of usable body surface area. Four Blockâ Classic 18TM included the Flying Arrow Archeryâ CycloneTM, Flying Arrow archery targets were stacked to capture arrows that passed Archeryâ ToxicTM, Flying Arrow Archeryâ Tom BombTM, Out- through the animals. Arrows that missed the animal or archery door Sports Productsâ SaberMaxxTM, Muzzyâ small game targets would fragment upon impact with a concrete barrier and point, and the Trophy Ridgeâ BuckblasterTM (Figs 8 and 9). then be captured by a B.U.P. Sportsâ The ShieldTM backstop Except for the 125 grain Trophy Ridgeâ BuckblasterTM, all (Fig. 11). arrowheads used were 100 grains. The arrow tips were attached A Nikon D90 digital camera affixed with an AF Zoom-NIK- to 68.6 cm (27-inch) Beman ICSâ BowhunterTM arrows, each KOR 24-85 mm f/2.8-4D IF lens was used to document the with a spine stiffness of 400 and weighing 8.4 grains per inch. morphology of the resulting entrance wounds. A Missionâ BallisticTM compound bow with a 72.4 cm (28.5- inch) draw length set to a 27.2 kg (60 lb) draw weight was used Results to fire the arrows (Fig. 10). This configuration produced an aver- age of velocity of 86 m/s (282 ft/s). The fixed, two-blade arrowheads, such as the Carbon The arrows were fired perpendicularly at pig carcasses from a Expressâ NativTM and Magnusâ StingerTM 2 blade, created distance of 10 meters. Previous research groups have shown the entrance wounds having the appearance of a typical stab wound FIG. 1––Broadhead design: (A) Fixed blade (B) Mechanical. Scale in inches. 142 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES FIG. 3––Fixed two-blade broadheads, side and tip views: (A) Carbon Expressâ NativTM (B) Magnusâ StingerTM 2 blade. Scale in inches. FIG. 4––Mechanical two-blade broadheads, side and tip views: (A) G5â HavocTM (B) Rageâ X-TremeTM (C) Swhackerâ. Scale in inches. SUNG ET AL. MORPHOLOGY OF MORDERN ARROWHEAD TIPS 143 FIG. 5––Fixed three-blade broadheads, side and tip views: (A) G5â MontecTM (B) Muzzyâ TrocarTM. Scale in inches. FIG. 6––Mechanical three-blade broadheads, side and tip views: (A) Rageâ KoreTM (B) Spitfireâ MaxxTM(C) Grim Reaperâ RazortipTM (D) G5â T3TM. Scale in inches. 144 JOURNAL OF FORENSIC SCIENCES FIG. 7––Four-blade, Magnusâ Stinger BuzzcutTM broadhead, side and tip views. Scale in inches FIG. 8––Flying Arrow Archery variant broadheads, side and tip views: (A) CycloneTM (B) ToxicTM (C) Tom BombTM. Scale in inches. SUNG ET AL. MORPHOLOGY OF MORDERN ARROWHEAD TIPS 145 FIG. 9––Additional variant broadheads, side and tip views: (A) Outdoor Sports Productsâ SaberMaxxTM (B) Muzzyâ small game point (C) Trophy Ridgeâ BuckblasterTM. Scale in inches. possessing bilateral pointed ends (7). The length of the stab Spitfireâ MaxxTM reflect a popular style of mechanical blade wound on the skin reflected the maximum width of the blades if deployment where the blades fold backward upon penetration the arrow shaft was perpendicular to the skin surface (Fig. 12A). into the skin and expose their cutting edge as it continues These two broadheads had blades that were continuous with the through the target. Although the blades are razor sharp, both the tip and began cutting the skin immediately upon contact. This central portions and three radiating cuts were abraded contrasts with those having trocar tips, like the Swhackerâ, with (Fig. 13B). The Rageâ KoreTM was unlike any of the other wounds exhibiting central abrasion flanked by nonabraded cuts broadheads because of its unsharpened tip.
Recommended publications
  • A Research Program on Innovations in Prehistory and Antiquity?

    A Research Program on Innovations in Prehistory and Antiquity?

    Special Volume 6 (2016): Space and Knowledge. Topoi Research Group Articles, ed. by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, pp. 777–818. Svend Hansen – Jürgen Renn – Florian Klimscha – Jochen Büttner – Barbara Helwing – Sebastian Kruse The Digital Atlas of Innovations: A Research Program on Innovations in Prehistory and Antiquity Edited by Gerd Graßhoff and Michael Meyer, Excellence Cluster Topoi, Berlin eTopoi ISSN 2192-2608 http://journal.topoi.org Except where otherwise noted, content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 Svend Hansen – Jürgen Renn – Florian Klimscha – Jochen Büttner – Barbara Helwing – Sebastian Kruse The Digital Atlas of Innovations: A Research Program on Innovations in Prehistory and Antiquity The authors discuss the simultaneous appearance of technological innovations in three key technologies (metallurgy, wheeled vehicles, weighing systems) in the second half of the 4th millennium. This is done from a source-critical perspective because the innova- tions are discussed with the help of dynamic maps from the Topoi project Digital Atlas of Innovations. Besides indications of diffusion gradients influenced by special research conditions, exceptional waves of innovation can be detected for all three technologies in the discussed period. These waves of innovation cannot, however, be generalized but have to be understood on the basis of the respective technology traditions and lines of devel- opment specific to local areas. Monocentric diffusion theories can be clearly disproven, local technology developments and their converging in certain centrally situated regions have to be assumed instead. Similarly, the transfer of objects and their châine opératoire can only be detected rather infrequently, while the adaptation to local socio-economic and environmental factors can be demonstrated.
  • ARROWS SUPREME, by American

    ARROWS SUPREME, by American

    CROSSBOWS FOR VIETNAM! VOLCANOLAND HUNTING PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE GUARANTEED OR YOUR MONEY BACK! the atomic bow The bold techniques of nuclear impregnated with a plastic mon­ chemistry have created the first omer and then atomically hard­ major chang,e in bowmaking ma­ ened. Wing's PRESENTATION II terials since the introduction of is a good example of the startling fiberglas. For years, archery results! The Lockwood riser in people have been looking for this bow is five times stronger improved woods. We've wanted than ordinary wood. It has 60% more beautiful types. Stronger more mass weight to keep you 1 woods. Woods with more mass on target. It has greater resist­ weight. We've searched for ways ance to abrasion and moisture. to protect wood against mois~ And the natural grain beauty of ture. What we were really after the wood is brought out to the turned out to be something bet­ fullest extent by the Lockwood COMING APRIL 1 &2 ter than the real thing. Wing found process. The PRESENTATION II 9th Annual International it in new Lockwood. An out­ PRESENTATION II. .. ......... •• $150.00 is one of several atomic bows Fair enough! I'm Interested In PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE growth of studies conducted by PRESENTATION I . ••• . •.• . •• •• $115.00 Indoor Archery Tournament waiting for you at your Wing the Atomic Energy Commission, WHITE WING • . • • • • • • . • . • • . • • $89.95 dealer. Ask him to show you our World's Largest SWIFT WING ..• ••••. ••••• •• $59.95 Lockwood is ordinary fine wood FALCON ••.••• •••• • . ••••. •• $29.95 new designs for 1967. Participating Sports Event Cobo Hall, Detroit Sponsored by Ben Pearson, Inc.
  • On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1

    On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1

    On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1 B.W. Kooi Groningen, The Netherlands 1983 1B.W. Kooi, On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow PhD-thesis, Mathematisch Instituut, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands (1983), Supported by ”Netherlands organization for the advancement of pure research” (Z.W.O.), project (63-57) 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Prefaceandsummary.............................. 5 1.2 Definitionsandclassifications . .. 7 1.3 Constructionofbowsandarrows . .. 11 1.4 Mathematicalmodelling . 14 1.5 Formermathematicalmodels . 17 1.6 Ourmathematicalmodel. 20 1.7 Unitsofmeasurement.............................. 22 1.8 Varietyinarchery................................ 23 1.9 Qualitycoefficients ............................... 25 1.10 Comparison of different mathematical models . ...... 26 1.11 Comparison of the mechanical performance . ....... 28 2 Static deformation of the bow 33 2.1 Summary .................................... 33 2.2 Introduction................................... 33 2.3 Formulationoftheproblem . 34 2.4 Numerical solution of the equation of equilibrium . ......... 37 2.5 Somenumericalresults . 40 2.6 A model of a bow with 100% shooting efficiency . .. 50 2.7 Acknowledgement................................ 52 3 Mechanics of the bow and arrow 55 3.1 Summary .................................... 55 3.2 Introduction................................... 55 3.3 Equationsofmotion .............................. 57 3.4 Finitedifferenceequations . .. 62 3.5 Somenumericalresults . 68 3.6 On the behaviour of the normal force
  • The Bow and Arrow in the Book of Mormon

    The Bow and Arrow in the Book of Mormon

    The Bow and Arrow in the Book of Mormon William J. Hamblin The distinctive characteristic of missile weapons used in combat is that a warrior throws or propels them to injure enemies at a distance.1 The great variety of missiles invented during the thousands of years of recorded warfare can be divided into four major technological categories, according to the means of propulsion. The simplest, including javelins and stones, is propelled by unaided human muscles. The second technological category — which uses mechanical devices to multiply, store, and transfer limited human energy, giving missiles greater range and power — includes bows and slings. Beginning in China in the late twelfth century and reaching Western Europe by the fourteenth century, the development of gunpowder as a missile propellant created the third category. In the twentieth century, liquid fuels and engines have led to the development of aircraft and modern ballistic missiles, the fourth category. Before gunpowder weapons, all missiles had fundamental limitations on range and effectiveness due to the lack of energy sources other than human muscles and simple mechanical power. The Book of Mormon mentions only early forms of pregunpowder missile weapons. The major military advantage of missile weapons is that they allow a soldier to injure his enemy from a distance, thereby leaving the soldier relatively safe from counterattacks with melee weapons. But missile weapons also have some signicant disadvantages. First, a missile weapon can be used only once: when a javelin or arrow has been cast, it generally cannot be used again. (Of course, a soldier may carry more than one javelin or arrow.) Second, control over a missile weapon tends to be limited; once a soldier casts a missile, he has no further control over the direction it will take.
  • Regulations Digest

    Regulations Digest

    2 NORTH CAROLINA 005-2006 Inland Fishing, Hunting and Trapping Regulations Digest Effective July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006 This publication is furnished free through the courtesy of the N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission. It is available online at www.ncwildlife.org. WILDLIFE ENDOWMENT FUND—THE BUY OF A LIFETIME MLIFE4 This application may be used to purchase a lifetime subscription to Wildlife in North Carolina magazine, to make a tax-deductible contribution to the Wildlife Endowment Fund, or to purchase a lifetime inland fishing and hunting license. To charge magazine subscriptions and adult lifetime licenses by phone (VISA or MasterCard only), call 1-888-248-6834. All proceeds for items sold or contributed on this application will be deposited in the Wildlife Endowment Fund. MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND TAX-DEDUCTIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS ■ Lifetime Magazine Subscription to Wildlife in North Carolina (Please allow 4-6 weeks for your subscription to begin.) . .$150 ■ I wish to make a tax-deductible contribution to the Wildlife Endowment Fund. Enclosed is my check for $ ___________. Make checks payable to Wildlife Endowment Fund. Credit card payments cannot be accepted for tax-deductible contributions. Name _________________________________________________________________ Daytime Phone ________________________________ Mailing Address_________________________________________________ City ______________________ State __________ Zip ___________ Method of Payment: ■ Check ■ VISA ■ MasterCard Acct. # ____________________________________ Expires ________________
  • Museum of New Mexico Office of Archaeological Studies

    Museum of New Mexico Office of Archaeological Studies

    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES THE GLOFUETA PROJECT: TEST EXCAVATIONS AT EIGHT PREHISTORIC SITESBETWEEN GLORIETA AND PECOS, NEW MEXICO Yvonne Roye Oakes with a contribution by James L. Moore Submitted by David A. Phillips, Jr., Ph.D. Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES NO. 45 SANTA FE 1991 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY In 1985 and 1986, the Research Section of the Laboratory of Anthropology, Museum of New Mexico, tested ten sites within the limits of the proposed reconstruction on State Road 50 between Glorieta and Pecos, New Mexico (New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department [NMSHTD] Project No. RS-1416[1]) and one site within the project limits at the Glorieta Interchange (NMSHTD Project No. IR-025-5[63]297). The purpose of the testing program was to evaluate the nature and extent of subsurface and surface remains on the sites and to determine their potential to yield significant information on the prehistory and history of the area. Project sites included two historic residential sites, a Pueblo fieldhouse, three rock shelters, and four lithic or sherd artifact scatters. One historic site, Pigeon’s Ranch (LA 49315), is on the National Register of Historic Places. It was the location of an 1850s stagestop on the Santa Fe Trail, a Civil War battle, and a trading post and tourist stop in the 1920s and 1930s. The other historic structure consists of a portion of a house foundation within the right-of-way. The two historic sites (LA 49265 and LA 49315) will be discussed in another volume. Remains of a small Pueblo IV fieldhouse were uncovered during the testing program.
  • Jewellery, Watches, Antiquities and Objects of Vertu 17 March 2020 J15

    Jewellery, Watches, Antiquities and Objects of Vertu 17 March 2020 J15

    DIX • NOONAN • WEBB JEWELLERY, WATCHES, ANTIQUITIES AND OBJECTS OF VERTU 17 MARCH 2020 J15 VERTU AND OBJECTS OF ANTIQUITIES WATCHES, WEBB JEWELLERY, • DIX • NOONAN www.dnw.co.uk 16 Bolton Street Mayfair London W1J 8BQ 020 7016 1700 [email protected] Jewellery, Watches, Antiquities and Objects of Vertu Tuesday 17th March 2020 at 1pm BOARD of DIRECTORS Pierce Noonan Chairman and CEO 020 7016 1700 [email protected] Nimrod Dix Deputy Chairman 020 7016 1820 [email protected] Robin Greville Chief Technology Officer 020 7016 1750 [email protected] Christopher Webb Head of Coin Department 020 7016 1801 [email protected] AUCTION and CLIENT SERVICES Philippa Healy Head of Administration (Associate Director) 020 7016 1775 [email protected] Emma Oxley Accounts and Viewing 020 7016 1701 [email protected] Christopher Mellor-Hill Head of Client Liaison (Associate Director) 020 7016 1771 [email protected] Chris Finch Hatton Client Liaison 020 7016 1754 [email protected] James King Head of Shipping and Facilities 020 7016 1833 [email protected] JEWELLERY, WATCHES and OBJECTS of VERTU Frances Noble Head of Department (Associate Director) 020 7016 1781 [email protected] Laura Smith Specialist 020 7016 1782 [email protected] Jessica Edmonds Junior Specialist and Auction Clerk 020 7016 1782 [email protected] COINS, TOKENS and COMMEMORATIVE MEDALS Christopher Webb Head of Department (Director) 020 7016 1801 [email protected] Peter Preston-Morley Specialist (Associate Director) 020 7016 1802 [email protected] Jim Brown Specialist 020 7016 1803 [email protected] Tim Wilkes Specialist
  • The Weapons of American Indians

    The Weapons of American Indians

    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 20 Number 3 Article 4 7-1-1945 The Weapons of American Indians D. E. Worcester Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Worcester, D. E.. "The Weapons of American Indians." New Mexico Historical Review 20, 3 (1945). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol20/iss3/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. THE WEAPONS OF AMERICAN INDIANS By D. E. WORCESTER* The weapons used by the American Indians were much the same among all the tribes and regions. Most common were the bow and arrow, the war club, and' the spear. These arms differed in type and quality an:iong various tribes, partiy because of the materials used, and partly because of the lack of uniformity in native workmanship. Bows were made of various woods as well as strips of ra:m and buffalo horn, and ranged in length from about five to three feet. Arrows also were varied, some being of reed, and others of highly polished wood. Points were of bone, flint, or fire-hardened wood. The coming ·of Europeans to North America eventually caused a modification of native arms. In some regions European weapons were adopted and used almost exclu~ sively. Elsewhere they were used to a varying degree, -depending on their availability and effectiveness under local conditions.
  • Ötzi the Iceman Worksheets

    Ötzi the Iceman Worksheets

    From mummies to mitochondria, skeletons to sequencing, Denisovans to DNA, molecules to murder…. Our human Inheritance Understanding our genetic ancestry & what makes us human featuring Ötzi the iceman Look at the mummy! Did you know: The Making of Ötzi’s Replica What type of images were used to make Ötzi’s ancient tattoos were the 3D print of Ötzi? made by making fine cuts in his skin and then rubbing charcoal in the cuts. Where in Italy is the real mummy stored? Ancient Ink Ötzi has 57 visible tattoos in the form of small lines and crosses. (4 cannot be seen.) Fatal Wound FIND and DRAW as many tattoos as you can on the illustration of the iceman’s mummy Evidence suggests that Ötzi was shot by (each line counts as a single tattoo; a cross an arrow, and this caused his death. would count as two). MARK the location of the arrow wound with an “X” on the Ötzi to the right. Damage CIRCLE the area of the mummy that is damaged. Did you know? The arrowhead that caused Ötzi to Did you know: bleed to death wasn’t This damage was caused discovered until 10 years after accidentally by a power tool the mummy was found. during the recovery of the mummy in 1991. Ötzi the iceman Read the panels! Did you know? Did you know? A paper published in 2016 All except one of Ötzi’s shows that Otzi also carried H. fingernails were missing; a pylori, a bacteria associated single detached nail was with stomach ulcers! found by his body! DNA Analysis Scientists identified DNA from different bacteria One of Ötzi’s fingernails had horizontal ridges and other living things.
  • Prehistoric Artefact Box: Complete Box

    Prehistoric Artefact Box: Complete Box

    PREHISTORIC ARTEFACT BOX PREHISTORIC ARTEFACT BOX: COMPLETE BOX 1 Antler Retoucheur 11 Leather Cup 2 Flint Retoucheur 12 Flint Scrapers [1 large & 4 x small] in pouch 3 Hammer Stone 13 Flint Arrowheads [x2] in box/pouch 4 Comb 14 Bronze Age Flint arrowhead in pouch 5 Needle & Thread 15 Hair Ornaments [x 2] in pouch 6 Slate Arrow 16 Mesolithic Arrow 7 Small Knife 17 Goddess Figurine 8 Resin Stick 18 Antler Tool 9 Bead Necklace 19 Prehistoric Loan Box- Risk Assessment 10 Hand Axe and Leather Covers 20 Artefact Box Booklet-Prehistoric Acknowledgements The artefacts were made by Emma Berry and Andrew Bates of Phenix Studios Ltd of Hexham, Northumberland. http://www.phenixstudios.com/ ARTEFACT BOX: PREHISTORIC Item: 1 Brief Description: Antler Retoucheur Further Information: This tool is made from antler. It was used to retouch flints-that means it was used to sharpen it by carefully chipping away small flakes away from a stone tool’s edge that had become blunt through use. Mesolithic and Neolithic flaked tools were made with a lot of retouching, as they were very small and very fine. Even Palaeolithic tools could be sharpened by retouching. Explore: The periods of prehistory covered in this artefact box are called: the Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic Ages (the Old, Middle and New Stone Ages) and the Bronze Age. What “Age” do we live in today? The Steel Age? The Plastic Age? Is everything we use made of this material? To find out more about each of these Stone Age periods follow this link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/guides/zpny34j#z98q2hv ARTEFACT BOX: PREHISTORIC Item: 2 Brief Description: Flint Retoucheur Further Information: The tip of this tool was made from antler and the handle is lime wood.
  • Native-Made Stone Tools of the Flint Hills

    Native-Made Stone Tools of the Flint Hills

    Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press 2020 - The Flint Hills: Rooted In Stone (Larry Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal Patton, editor) Native-Made Stone Tools Of The Flint Hills Jack L. Hofman Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/sfh Recommended Citation Hofman, Jack L. (2020). "Native-Made Stone Tools Of The Flint Hills," Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal. https://newprairiepress.org/sfh/2020/history/2 To order hard copies of the Field Journals, go to shop.symphonyintheflinthills.org. The Field Journals are made possible in part with funding from the Fred C. and Mary R. Koch Foundation. This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIVE-MADE STONE TOOLS OF THE FLINT HILLS For more than 13,000 years, people have been living in the Flint Hills region. For most of this period, their primary material for making tough, durable tools was the flint or “chert” stone from which the Flint Hills derive their name. The use of bone, wood, antler, and limestone was also important, but the most durable and preserved aspects of these early technologies are the chipped stone tools and the debitage or flakes left from the manufacture of those tools. The economies of the prehistoric cultural groups who lived in the Flint Hills were diverse, changing through time and adjusting to the seasons and resource availability.
  • Lost and Found

    Lost and Found

    Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology | Vol. 30, No. 1 (2010) | pp. 87–96 LOST AND FOUND In 1897, David R. Leeper initiated a discussion on the Among the first authorities I consulted... [Leeper survival of lithic technology in California in the short­ has lengthy quotes, deleted here, from Revere’s Tour of lived journal The Antiquarian and its successor the Duty in California, Hittell’s History of California, and American Archaeologist, and started a debate that ran papers by Otis Mason]. for several issues and to which a number of pioneering Finally, Prof. Dumont Lotz, of the South Bend High figures contributed. Their recollections of early days School faculty, in a letter to me under date of April 28, in the state and their encounters with native peoples 1897, has enabled me to present the following additional often reflect some of the cultural biases of the day, but information in point: they also contain interesting observations and valuable During a recent conversation with you the question data available nowhere else. The more significant of arose as to the origin of the obsidian arrow heads these are reprinted here, with a few figures, some lengthy which are found in large numbers in Washington, Oregon and California. At that time I stated that quotes from published sources, and extraneous materials they were of quite recent origin and had been made deleted. The deletions are indicated by points of ellipsis; and used by Indians who are yet living. I wish to offer the interested reader will find the complete, original texts some evidence in support of that statement.