DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1 On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow 1 B.W. Kooi Groningen, The Netherlands 1983 1B.W. Kooi, On the Mechanics of the Bow and Arrow PhD-thesis, Mathematisch Instituut, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands (1983), Supported by ”Netherlands organization for the advancement of pure research” (Z.W.O.), project (63-57) 2 Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Prefaceandsummary.............................. 5 1.2 Definitionsandclassifications . .. 7 1.3 Constructionofbowsandarrows . .. 11 1.4 Mathematicalmodelling . 14 1.5 Formermathematicalmodels . 17 1.6 Ourmathematicalmodel. 20 1.7 Unitsofmeasurement.............................. 22 1.8 Varietyinarchery................................ 23 1.9 Qualitycoefficients ............................... 25 1.10 Comparison of different mathematical models . ...... 26 1.11 Comparison of the mechanical performance . ....... 28 2 Static deformation of the bow 33 2.1 Summary .................................... 33 2.2 Introduction................................... 33 2.3 Formulationoftheproblem . 34 2.4 Numerical solution of the equation of equilibrium . ......... 37 2.5 Somenumericalresults . 40 2.6 A model of a bow with 100% shooting efficiency . .. 50 2.7 Acknowledgement................................ 52 3 Mechanics of the bow and arrow 55 3.1 Summary .................................... 55 3.2 Introduction................................... 55 3.3 Equationsofmotion .............................. 57 3.4 Finitedifferenceequations . .. 62 3.5 Somenumericalresults . 68 3.6 On the behaviour of the normal force T at t =0............... 80 3.7 Acknowledgements ............................... 82 3 4 CONTENTS 4 The static recurve bow 83 4.1 Summary .................................... 83 4.2 Introduction................................... 83 4.3 Theequationsofmotion ............................ 87 4.4 Finite-differenceequations . ... 93 4.5 Thequalitycoefficients ............................. 98 4.6 Threemodels .................................. 100 4.7 Influence mass and stiffness of string . 106 4.8 Fibratorymotion ................................ 109 4.9 Sensitivity analysis for a straight-end bow . ........ 117 4.10 Modelforstatic-recurvebow . .... 130 4.11 Static-recurvebow .............................. 136 4.12 Influence of draw, weight and mass of limb . .... 156 4.13 Another check on our numerical method . .... 165 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Preface and summary The invention of the bow and arrow may rank in social impact with the invention of the art of kindling fire and that of the wheel. It must have been in prehistoric times that the first missile was projected by means of a bow. Where and when we do not know, perhaps even in different parts of the world at about the same time. Then man was able to hunt game and to engage his enemies at a distance. In the 15th century the bow in the ”civilized” world was superseded on battle fields by the fire-arm and became an instrument for pastime. Today, archery is a modern, competitive sport. The mechanics of the bow and arrow became a subject of scientific research after the bow had lost its importance as a hunting and war weapon. In the 1930’s C.N. Hickman, P.E. Klopsteg [6] and others performed experiments and made mathematical models. Their work both improved the understanding of the action of the bow and influenced the design of the bow strongly. In this thesis a mathematical simulation is made of the mechanical performance during the projection of the arrow by means of a bow. Because nowadays fast computers are available, we are able to cope with more advanced models, which are supposed to supply more detailed results. The flight of the arrow through the air and the way it penetrates the target is beyond the scope of this thesis. Characteristic for the bow are the slender elastic limbs. The bow is braced by putting a string shorter than the bow between the tips of the limbs. We distinguish between three different types of bows on the ground of the interplay between string and limbs. For bows of the first type, the ”non-recurve” bows, the limbs have contact with the string only at their tips. The Angular bow used in Egypt and Assyria and the famous English wooden longbow are non-recurve bows. In almost all Asia a bow made of wood, horn and sinew was used. In braced situation the string lies along a part of the limbs near the tips. Along this length and often further these limbs are stiff; they do not deform during the drawing of the bow. These bows are called ”static-recurve” bows. More recently bows are designed 5 6 CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION made of wood and man-made materials such as glass or carbon fibres imbedded in resin. For these bows the string also lies along the limbs in the braced situation for a short length. However, the limbs are now elastic along their whole length. These bows are called ”working-recurve” bows. In this thesis we restrict to bows of the mentioned three types which are symmetric, so we do not discuss the interesting asymmetric bow of Japan. In Chapter 2 we deal with bracing and drawing bows of all three types. The limbs are considered as beams for which the Bernoulli-Euler equation holds. In each situation, the equations form a system of coupled ordinary differential equations with two-point boundary conditions. A shooting method is described by which this system is solved. As a result of this, the problem is reduced to the solution of two non-linear equations with two unknowns. Attention is payed to the problem of finding starting points for the secant-Newton method which is used for solving these two equations. After loosing, part of the energy accumulated in the limbs is transferred to the arrow. In Chapter 3 we deal with the dynamics of the non-recurve bow. The bow is assumed to be clamped in the middle. The string is assumed to be without mass and to be inextensible. The governing equations are the equations of motion for the limbs. These equation are derived using Hamilton’s principle, the internal as well as the external damping having been neglected. There are two independent variables, the length coordinate along the bow and the time coordinate and there are six unknown functions. The boundary conditions at the tips contain the equation of motion for the arrow. A numerical solution is obtained by means of a finite-difference method. A Crank-Nicolson scheme is used, then for each time step a system of non-linear equations has to be solved. This has been done by a modified Newtonian method. The solutions of previous times are used to obtain starting points. At the moment of release the solution of the shooting method as described in Chapter 2 is used as starting point. In Chapter 4 the string is elastic and possesses mass. A part of this chapter deals also with the non-recurve bow, of which we consider now also the vibratory motion of bow and string after arrow exit. Then the governing equations form two coupled systems of partial differential equations. Besides time, for one system the length coordinate along the limbs and for the other one the length coordinate along the string is the independent variable. At the tips these systems are linked by the boundary conditions. The main object of Chapter 4 is the dynamics of the static-recurve bow. For this type it is necessary to take into account that the string has contact with the tips during the first part of the shooting and after a beforehand unknown time with the part of the ears between tips and string-bridges. In this case but also when the arrow leaves the string, the boundary conditions change abruptly at a moment which has to be calculated. Because of lack of time we have to leave the dynamics of the working-recurve bow out of consideration. In this thesis we do not deal with proofs of existence and convergence of the numerical methods. We did try, however, to obtain an insight into the accuracy of the developed methods. For example, the analytic solution of a linearized problem is compared with the obtained numerical solution. This is done in Section 4.13. The mathematical simulation is used for theoretical experiments. The aim of these experiments is to get insight into the influence of different quantities which determine the 1.2. DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS 7 action of the bow and arrow. This supplies the possibility to compare several types of bows which have been developed in different human societies. This is also done in Chapter 4. It appears that the static-recurve bow is not inherent better than the long straight bow. The meaning of the word inherent in this context is given in Sections 1.7 and 1.9 of this introduction. When the different properties of the materials, wood, horn and sinew, are deliberately used, more energy per unit of mass can be stored in the limbs of the Asiatic bow than in those of the wooden bow. Further, the static-recurve bow can be made shorter without the loss of much quality. Their shortness makes them handier and suitable for the use on horseback. Chapter 2 and 3 are reprints of published papers and Chapter 4 that of an unpublished one. As a result of this each chapter begins with an introductory section in which we give a short outline of archery and each chapter has a separate list of references; sometimes a reference is a chapter of this thesis. In this introduction we quote from various books and papers given in Lake and Wright [11]. This is an indexed catalogue of 5,000 articles, books, films, manuscripts, periodicals and theses on the use of the bow, from the earliest times up to the year 1973. 1.2 Definitions and classifications In this section we give the nomenclature of the different parts of the bow and arrow and the classification of bows we have used. Characteristic features of the bow are the slender elastic ”stave” and the light string, shorter than the stave, see Figure 1.1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARROWS SUPREME, by American
    CROSSBOWS FOR VIETNAM! VOLCANOLAND HUNTING PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE GUARANTEED OR YOUR MONEY BACK! the atomic bow The bold techniques of nuclear impregnated with a plastic mon­ chemistry have created the first omer and then atomically hard­ major chang,e in bowmaking ma­ ened. Wing's PRESENTATION II terials since the introduction of is a good example of the startling fiberglas. For years, archery results! The Lockwood riser in people have been looking for this bow is five times stronger improved woods. We've wanted than ordinary wood. It has 60% more beautiful types. Stronger more mass weight to keep you 1 woods. Woods with more mass on target. It has greater resist­ weight. We've searched for ways ance to abrasion and moisture. to protect wood against mois~ And the natural grain beauty of ture. What we were really after the wood is brought out to the turned out to be something bet­ fullest extent by the Lockwood COMING APRIL 1 &2 ter than the real thing. Wing found process. The PRESENTATION II 9th Annual International it in new Lockwood. An out­ PRESENTATION II. .. ......... •• $150.00 is one of several atomic bows Fair enough! I'm Interested In PROFESSIONAL PERFORMANCE growth of studies conducted by PRESENTATION I . ••• . •.• . •• •• $115.00 Indoor Archery Tournament waiting for you at your Wing the Atomic Energy Commission, WHITE WING • . • • • • • • . • . • • . • • $89.95 dealer. Ask him to show you our World's Largest SWIFT WING ..• ••••. ••••• •• $59.95 Lockwood is ordinary fine wood FALCON ••.••• •••• • . ••••. •• $29.95 new designs for 1967. Participating Sports Event Cobo Hall, Detroit Sponsored by Ben Pearson, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Arrow Company Profile
    Fact Sheet Executive Officers Arrow Company Michael J. Long Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Profile Paul J. Reilly Arrow is a global provider of products, services, and solutions to industrial Executive Vice President, Finance and Operations, and Chief Financial Officer and commercial users of electronic components and enterprise computing solutions, with 2012 sales of $20.4 billion. Arrow serves as a supply channel Peter S. Brown partner for over 100,000 original equipment manufacturers, contract Senior Vice President, General Counsel manufacturers, and commercial customers through a global network of more and Secretary than 470 locations in 55 countries. A Fortune 150 company with 16,500 Andrew S. Bryant employees worldwide, Arrow brings the technology solutions of its suppliers President, Global Enterprise to a breadth of markets, including industrial equipment, information systems, Computing Solutions automotive and transportation, aerospace and defense, medical and life Vincent P. Melvin sciences, telecommunications and consumer electronics, and helps customers Vice President and Chief Information Officer introduce innovative products, reduce their time to market, and enhance their M. Catherine Morris overall competiveness. Senior Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer FAST FACTS Eric J. Schuck President, Global Components > Ticker Symbol: ARW (NYSE) > Fortune 500 Ranking1: 141 Gretchen K. Zech > 2012 Sales: $20.4 billion > Employees Worldwide: 16,500 Senior Vice President, Global Human - Global Components: $13.4 > Customers Worldwide: 100,000 Resources billion - Global Enterprise Computing > Industry: Electronic Solutions: $7 billion Components and Computer Products Distribution 20122012 Sales Sales by Geographic by Geographic Region Region > 2012 Net Income: $506.3 million > Founded: 1935 19% ASIA/PACIFIC > 2012 Operating Income: > Incorporated: 1946 52% AMERICAS $804.1 million > Public: 1961 > 2012 EPS: $4.56 > Website: www.arrow.com > Locations: more than 470 worldwide 29% 1 Ranking of the largest U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bow and Arrow in the Book of Mormon
    The Bow and Arrow in the Book of Mormon William J. Hamblin The distinctive characteristic of missile weapons used in combat is that a warrior throws or propels them to injure enemies at a distance.1 The great variety of missiles invented during the thousands of years of recorded warfare can be divided into four major technological categories, according to the means of propulsion. The simplest, including javelins and stones, is propelled by unaided human muscles. The second technological category — which uses mechanical devices to multiply, store, and transfer limited human energy, giving missiles greater range and power — includes bows and slings. Beginning in China in the late twelfth century and reaching Western Europe by the fourteenth century, the development of gunpowder as a missile propellant created the third category. In the twentieth century, liquid fuels and engines have led to the development of aircraft and modern ballistic missiles, the fourth category. Before gunpowder weapons, all missiles had fundamental limitations on range and effectiveness due to the lack of energy sources other than human muscles and simple mechanical power. The Book of Mormon mentions only early forms of pregunpowder missile weapons. The major military advantage of missile weapons is that they allow a soldier to injure his enemy from a distance, thereby leaving the soldier relatively safe from counterattacks with melee weapons. But missile weapons also have some signicant disadvantages. First, a missile weapon can be used only once: when a javelin or arrow has been cast, it generally cannot be used again. (Of course, a soldier may carry more than one javelin or arrow.) Second, control over a missile weapon tends to be limited; once a soldier casts a missile, he has no further control over the direction it will take.
    [Show full text]
  • Shooting the Longbow
    Shooting the Longbow Some coaching tips Steve Purkiss (Fox Archers) Equipment Bows Longbows, being made from wood, need to be protected from the elements. Even a “varnished” bow can let in moisture due to marks and scratches from regular use. Polish the bows with a wax polish, Danish Oil or even a smear of vaseline to help keep out the wet which can ruin your bow. Pay special attention to the area where the arrow “passes” the bow as obvious wear will take it down to exposed wood. Also keep the string waxed, most modern strings are fairly waterproof but as the string is twisted and the strands rub against each other under tension waxing helps cut down wear. Apply wax to the string and then rub with a small piece of leather this warms the wax and string and helps the wax to move between the strands. If you are used to shooting a recurve bow then you will find that the draw weight of a longbow feels different to a recurve simply due to the nature of the beast and therefore if you are used to a 30lb recurve you might find a 35lb longbow comfortable. The bracing height of the bow is the distance from the string to the belly of the bow (the part of the bow facing you when you hold it to shoot). This is often written on the bow (normally 5.5” to 6.5”) set your bow up to this height for optimum performance. Always “warm up” your bow before you shoot, this is done by rubbing the bow with a cloth and then repeatedly drawing the bow to half draw and gradually increasing to full draw either in the normal manner of by putting your foot against the grip and holding the string then you can use you foot and hand to extend the bow.
    [Show full text]
  • Passion and Glory! Spectacular $Nale to National Series
    01 Cover_DC_SKC_V2_APP:Archery 2012 22/9/14 14:25 Page 1 AUTUMN 2014 £4.95 Passion and glory! Spectacular $nale to National Series Fields of victory At home and abroad Fun as future stars shine Medals galore! Longbow G Talent Festival G VI archery 03 Contents_KC_V2_APP:Archery 2012 24/9/14 11:44 Page 3 CONTENTS 3 Welcome to 0 PICTURE: COVER: AUTUMN 2014 £4.95 Larry Godfrey wins National Series gold Dean Alberga Passion and glory! Spectacular $nale to National Series Wow,what a summer! It’s been non-stop.And if the number of stories received over the past few Fields of victory weeks is anything to go by,it looks like it’s been the At home and abroad same for all of us! Because of that, some stories and regular features Fun as future have been held over until the next issue – but don’t stars shine Medals galore! worry,they will be back. Longbow G Talent Festival G VI archery So what do we have in this issue? There is full coverage of the Nottingham Building Society Cover Story National Series Grand Finals at Wollaton Hall, including exclusive interviews with Paralympians John 40 Nottingham Building Society National Series Finals Stubbs and Matt Stutzman.And, as many of our young archers head off to university,we take a look at their options. We have important – and possibly unexpected – news for tournament Features organisers, plus details about Archery GB’s new Nominations Committee. 34 Big Weekend There have been some fantastic results at every level, both at home and abroad.We have full coverage of domestic successes as well the hoard of 38 Field Archery international medals won by our 2eld, para and Performance archers.
    [Show full text]
  • Intro to Archery
    INTRODUCTION TO ARCHERY TARGET ARCHERY This the most commonly practiced form of archery worldwide and is practiced within most Archery Australia clubs. Target tournaments are conducted regularly and held both indoors and outdoors. Shooting distances vary from 18 metres (indoor) to 90 metres (outdoor), with target sizes being 40 or 60 centimetres for indoors and either 80 or 122 centimetres for outdoors. Targets have five colours with each colour being divided into 2 to provide 10 scoring zones. The innermost ring is given a value of 10 points, down to the outermost ring with a value of 1 point. Target rounds involve shooting a set number of arrows over one or several distances. Indoor events involve shooting a total of either 30 or 60 arrows; with outdoor events shooting 72, 90, 120 or 144 arrows are shot. FIELD ARCHERY Field archery is a challenging outdoor discipline in which the archer takes on the terrain as well as the target. Field archery is a combination of archery, golf, and bush walking. A course is set up in a bush land setting taking advantage of hills, slopes, angles and light and shade. A field course is made up of either 24 or 28 targets depending on the round being shot. The archer is required to shoot either three or four arrows at each target. Distances range from 10 to 60 metres and target face sizes vary from 20 to 80 centimetres. CLOUT ARCHERY Clout archery is another popular discipline in Australia because due to its fun aspect. Clout archery is derived from medieval warfare where archers would lob arrows onto the advancing army.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Arrows Ronald A
    Fact Sheet 6 Making Arrows Ronald A. Howard Jr.* Many archers enjoy making increase arrow mass. Wooden been exposed to the graphite their own arrows because it shafts must be lacquered or fibers. Those fibers are hard, allows them to exercise painted full length to protect stiff and fine. They survive personal quality control, add them from moisture. cooking well and can cause injury if swallowed. Many special features, personalize the Fiberglass shafts are lighter than target archers, particularly arrows in other ways or add to wooden shafts of the same spine those shooting bows equipped their shooting enjoyment. weight. They remain relatively with overdraws, prefer graphite Making arrows involves straight, and they can be matched shafts. several steps, but it is not in spine and arrow mass much difficult. High quality arrows better than wooden shafts. Aluminum shafts have been the can be made with care and Although fiberglass is a tough standard of both target archers attention to detail. material, these shafts are subject and bowhunters for many Shaft Selection to splitting on impact. They also years. The shafts can be made tend to shatter or splinter if to very close tolerances in a The first step is selecting the variety of alloys, offering easy shaft type and size desired. struck along their length. Shafts with internal damage may even matching in spine and weight. Arrow shafts are available in Aluminum shaft materials may wood, fiberglass, graphite, shatter during a release. Fiberglass has been an excellent be obtained in inexpensive soft aluminum and graphite- alloys that are easily bent or aluminum combinations.
    [Show full text]
  • FITA Level 1 Coaching Guide
    COACHES MANUAL ENTRY LEVEL http://www.archery.org FITA Coaches Committee Coaching Manual - Entry Level Table of Content s Introduction Chapter 1 The archer’s skills Chapter 2 S teps of the Shooting Sequence Chapter 3 Safety Chapter 4 Archery Classes and Entry level Program Chapter 5 Common Problems Chapter 6 Coach’s Role Chapter 7 Teaching suggestions for the Coach Chapter 8 Tip s for your demonstration, organization and present ation Chapter 9 Tip s for practice planning Chapter 10 Some suggested Teaching exercises Chapter 11 Facilities for group instruction Chapter 12 The disabled archer Chapter 13 Games COACHING MANUAL Glossary COACHING MANUAL Dear Coaches and Friends, As President of FITA, I am very pleased with the results of the hard work of the Coaches Committee, the FITA office and all those coaches who have contributed to this valuable manual. FITA now has an updated coaching manual that will unify the basic coaching knowledge of the best coaches in the world. It is important that a uniform method be used at the basic level to give all new enthusiasts a well-tested foundation of the best archery practices. Archers will be able to go from this level to that of a recreational, national or international participant, building on this basic training with intermediate and expert coach- ing. My special thanks to Juan Carlos Holgado, Coaches Committee Chairman and Pascal Colmaire, FITA Development Director for their great effort and knowledge to write and compile this manual. Best regards, Jim Easton President COACHING MANUAL ere is the first coaching manual of the Federation Internationale de Tir àl'Arc (FITA).
    [Show full text]
  • Coaches Manual
    Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Boberskyj Department of shooting and technical sports Subject "Theory and Methodology of the Selected Sport and Improvement of Sports Skill – archery" for 4 courses students LECTURE: "TERMINOLOGY / GLOSSARY IN ARCHERY" by prof. Bogdan Vynogradskyi Lviv – 2020 TERMINOLOGY / GLOSSARY Actual draw length: The personal draw length Barrelled arrow: An arrow that has a greater of the archer measured at full draw, from the cross section in the middle and tapers down at bottom of the slot in the nock to the pivot point both ends. of the grip plus 1 3/4 inch (45mm), which is the Basic technique: The fundamental technique of back edge (far side of the bow) on most bows. shooting a bow and arrow. Usually the style Actual arrow length: The personal arrow taught during the introduction to archery, length of the archer, measured from the bottom forming the basis for consistent shooting. slot of the nock to the end of the shaft (this Belly (of bow): The surface of the bow facing measurement does not include the point/pile); the archer during shooting. Also known as the with this end of the shaft at 1 inch (25mm) in “face” of the bow. front of the vertical passing through the deepest point of the bow grip or the arrow rest. Black: The fourth scoring colour on the Indoor/Outdoor target face, when counting from Actual draw weight: The energy required to the centre of the target. draw the bow to the actual draw length (commonly measured in pounds).
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of Modern Arrowhead Tips on Human Skin Analog*
    J Forensic Sci, January 2018, Vol. 63, No. 1 doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13502 PAPER Available online at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com PATHOLOGY/BIOLOGY LokMan Sung,1,2 M.D.; Kilak Kesha,3 M.D.; Jeffrey Hudson,4,5 M.D.; Kelly Root,1 and Leigh Hlavaty,1,2 M.D. Morphology of Modern Arrowhead Tips on Human Skin Analog* ABSTRACT: Archery has experienced a recent resurgence in participation and has seen increases in archery range attendance and in chil- dren and young adults seeking archery lessons. Popular literature and movies prominently feature protagonists well versed in this form of weap- onry. Periodic homicide cases in the United States involving bows are reported, and despite this and the current interest in the field, there are no manuscripts published on a large series of arrow wounds. This experiment utilizes a broad selection of modern arrowheads to create wounds for comparison. While general appearances mimicked the arrowhead shape, details such as the presence of abrasions were greatly influenced by the design of the arrowhead tip. Additionally, in the absence of projectiles or available history, arrowhead injuries can mimic other instruments causing penetrating wounds. A published resource on arrowhead injuries would allow differentiation of causes of injury by forensic scientists. KEYWORDS: forensic science, forensic pathology, compound bow, arrow, broadhead, morphology Archery, defined as the art, practice, and skill of shooting arrows While investigations into the penetrating ability of arrows with a bow, is indelibly entwined in human history. Accounts of have been published (5), this article is the first large-scale study the bow and arrow can be chronicled throughout human civiliza- evaluating the cutaneous morphology of modern broadhead tion from its origins as a primary hunting tool, migration to utiliza- arrow tip injuries in a controlled environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist Volume 43 No
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 43 NO. 2 SPRING 1993 Published by THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF OHIO The Archaeological Society of Ohio MEMBERSHIP AND DUES Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are payable on the first TERM of January as follows: Regular membership $17.50; husband and wife EXPIRES A.S.O. OFFICERS (one copy of publication) $18.50; Life membership $300.00. Subscription to the Ohio Archaeologist, published quarterly, is included in the member­ 1994 President Larry L. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue SE, East ship dues. The Archaeological Society of Ohio is an incorporated non­ Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 profit organization. 1994 Vice President Stephen J. Parker, 1859 Frank Drive, Lancaster, OH 43130, (614)653-6642 BACK ISSUES 1994 Exec. Sect. Donald A. Casto, 138 Ann Court, Lancaster, OH Publications and back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist: Ohio Flint Types, by Robert N. Converse $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43130,(614)653-9477 Ohio Stone Tools, by Robert N. Converse $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Recording Sect. Nancy E. Morris, 901 Evening Star Avenue Ohio Slate Types, by Robert N. Converse $15.00 add $1.50 P-H SE. East Canton, OH 44730, (216) 488-1640 The Glacial Kame Indians, by Robert N. Converse .$20.00 add $1.50 P-H 1994 Treasurer Don F. Potter, 1391 Hootman Drive, Reynoldsburg, 1980's & 1990's $ 6.00 add $1.50 P-H OH 43068, (614)861-0673 1970's $ 8.00 add $1.50 P-H 1998 Editor Robert N. Converse, 199 Converse Dr., Plain City, OH 1960's $10.00 add $1.50 P-H 43064,(614)873-5471 Back issues of the Ohio Archaeologist printed prior to 1964 are gener­ ally out of print but copies are available from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Stones, Bones, and States: a New Approach to the Neolithic Revolution
    1 Stones, Bones, and States: A New Approach to the Neolithic Revolution Richard H. Steckel and John Wallis February 19, 2007 The invention of agriculture, the wide spread shift to a sedentary lifestyle, and the growth of large population centers began around 10,000 years ago in what we now call the Neolithic revolution. This profound change in human activity marks the beginning of modern human society and has long been of interest to economists, anthropologists, and social scientists in general. Was it caused by a shift in relative prices due to climate, population pressure, or changes in the animal environment? Did it result from technological innovation in human knowledge about the physical world? Was institutional change a catalyst? Early research was highly speculative, with abundant explanations built on little data. New evidence from archeology and anthropology has eliminated some hypotheses and raised possibilities for answering more specific questions. This paper contributes to both the Neolithic empirical evidence and the theoretical questions about the Neolithic revolution. We propose a theoretical answer to how larger social groups were organized. A sedentary life-style was necessary for settled agriculture, and the shift to larger population units occurred contemporaneously with, and may have even preceded, the spread of new agricultural techniques. We then focus on the paradoxes inherent in the question: why did people move into towns and cities? Urban living came at a substantial cost. Accumulating evidence from skeletons, which we discuss below, shows that Neolithic cities and towns were unhealthy. Their residents were smaller in stature than hunter-gatherers and their bones had relatively more lesions indicating dental decay, infections and other signs of physiological stress.
    [Show full text]