SIEMENS AG NOTE : If a Parent Company for This Entity Is Reported, Click the Link on Its Parent DUNS Number Below to See Its Consolidated Profile
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Siemens Ag
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF SIEMENS AG Authors (Universitat de Barcelona): Patrícia Amor Agut Clara Valls Moreno Gemma Casserras EDITOR: Jordi Marti Pidelaserra (Dpt. Comptabilitat, Universitat Barcelona) 1 Patrícia Amor 14961785 Clara Valls 14959906 Gemma Casserras 14965090 Alessandra Cortegiani (Bloc 3) 14991480 2 BLOC 1: SIEMENS AG BLOC 2: Risk Analysis BLOC 3: Profitability Analysis 3 BLOC 1 SIEMENS AG BASIC INFORMATION 4 Index 1. Introduction 2. Company History 3. Vision, Mission and Strategy 3.1. Vision 3.2. Mission 3.3. Strategy 4. Company Structure 4.1. Board of directors 4.2. Management by sector 5. Company Sectors 5.1. Energy Sector 5.2. Industry Sector 5.3. Healthcare Sector 5.4. Infrastructure and cities Sector 5.5. Financial Services 5.6. Other activities 5.7. Revenues importance 6. Shareholders 7. Stakeholders 8. Competitors 5 1. Introduction: Siemens AG is a German multinational engineering and electronics conglomerate company headquartered in Munich, Germany. It is the largest based in Europe. Founded to manufacture and install telegraphic systems, Germany-based Siemens AG has prospered and grown over 165 years to become a multifaceted electronics and electrical engineering enterprise, and one of the most international corporations in the world. Founded to manufacture and install telegraphic systems, Germany-based Siemens AG has prospered and grown over 165 years to become a multifaceted electronics and electrical engineering enterprise, and one of the most international corporations in the world. The Siemens name has been synonymous with cutting-edge technologies and continuous growth in profitability. With their wide array of products, systems and services, they are world leaders in information and communications, automation and control, power, medical solutions, transportation and lighting. -
Joint Spin-Off Report
This report is a non-binding convenience translation of the German-language original report, which is the legally relevant document under German law. Joint Spin-off Report of the Managing Boards of Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, Berlin and Munich, and OSRAM Licht AG, Munich, on the Spin-off of a Majority Participation in OSRAM pursuant to Section 127 sentence 1 German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz) I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 11 II. Starting situation – The legal entities involved in the Spin-off and the Siemens Group prior to the Spin-off ....................................................................................... 14 1. Overview of the Siemens Group ................................................................................ 14 2. Siemens AG as the transferring entity...................................................................... 16 a) Registered office and fiscal year .................................................................... 16 b) Capital stock and shares ................................................................................ 16 c) Warrant bonds ................................................................................................ 16 d) Stock-based compensation programs and employee participation programs – authorization to purchase treasury shares .............................. 17 e) Shareholder structure and trading on the stock exchange ......................... 18 f) Managing -
Siemens Company History Phase8
New paths in a time of crisis 1989–2006 The years from 1989 to 2006 confronted the company with challenges unlike any before – including the first comprehensive reform of the corporate organization, the launch of the Ten- Point Program, and the compliance crisis – that compelled its chief players to make fundamental changes. 1989 was a year of profound changes, not just for Germany and global politics, but for Siemens. Twenty years after the company’s last major organizational reform, there was a need for action. Siemens AG had outgrown the structure that had been laid out back in 1966 and 1969. Where revenues in fiscal 1969 had been 12.7 billion deutschmarks, by 1986 they had risen to 51.4 billion. The number of business units had grown to eight by the end of the 1980s. Karlheinz Kaske, CEO from 1981 to 1992, aimed to improve "mo- bility, effectiveness and competitiveness," with an organizational structure that took due account of the company's changing envi- ronment – the technological paradigm shift from mechanical de- vices to electronics and microelectronics, the growth of interna- tional business, a greatly expanded worldwide customer base, and ever-intensifying competition. So top management first of all set up a more effective administrative structure. The eight former business units were rearranged into 15 new, leaner units, two operating Groups with their own legal form, and two independ- ent Divisions. Each was responsible for its own profits and value chain – from development through production to sales – and each was managed by three Group Executive Managers. Top management, which formerly included more than 30 people, was © Siemens Historical Institute 2017 1/4 siemens.com/history cut by a third. -
Siemens Management Innovation at the Corporate Level Case Study Reference No 310-114-1
Siemens Management Innovation at the Corporate Level Case study Reference no 310-114-1 This case was written by Dr Markus Menz and Professor Dr Guenter Mueller-Stewens, University of St Gallen, Switzerland. It is intended to be used as the basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of a management situation. The case was written with the support of a Philip Law Scholarship awarded by ecch. The case was made possible by the co-operation of Siemens AG and from published sources. © 2010, University of St Gallen, Switzerland. No part of this publication may be copied, stored, transmitted, reproduced or distributed in any form or medium whatsoever without the permission of the copyright owner. Distributed by ecch, UK and USA North America Rest of the world www.ecch.com t +1 781 239 5884 t +44 (0)1234 750903 ecch the case for learning All rights reserved f +1 781 239 5885 f +44 (0)1234 751125 Printed in UK and USA e [email protected] e [email protected] 310-114-1 MARKUS MENZ GÜNTER MÜLLER-STEWENS SIEMENS: MANAGEMENT INNOVATION AT THE CORPORATE LEVEL INTRODUCTION At the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting in February 1998, Siemens announced disappointing overall results for fiscal 1997. While the firm’s sales growth met shareholder expectations, net income remained largely stable. During the following weeks and months, Siemens’ top management not only faced increased pressure from its shareholders, but also higher environmental uncertainty and stronger global competition than during the early and mid-1990s. The challenge for the top management team was to optimize the business portfolio in a way that promised to add substantial shareholder value over the next years. -
We Are on the Right Track for Ensuring Our Success
s »We have made great progress in »We are on the right track for networking our internal value ensuring our success as the chain electronically and in linking it to our customers, suppliers and Global network of innovation.« partners. This is enabling us to accelerate processes and cut costs.« Annual Report 2001 Annual s Annual Report 2001 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Order No. A19100-F-V055-X-7600 Siemens Siemens is a network encompassing well over 400,000 people in 190 countries. information on contents for external orders We take pride in possessing in-depth knowledge of customers' requirements, the Telephone +49 89 636-33032 (Press Office) e-mail [email protected] expertise to create innovative solutions in electrical engineering and electronics, and +49 89 636-32474 (Investor Relations) Internet http://www.siemens.de/geschaeftsbericht_2001/order Fax +49 89 636-32825 (Press Office) Telephone +49 89 636-32910 the experience to successfully navigate even rough economic waters. But our greatest +49 89 636-32830 (Investor Relations) Fax +49 89 636-32908 e-mail [email protected] asset is undoubtedly our people, with their unparalleled motivation and their passion [email protected] for outperforming our competitors. Linked via a global network that enables them address for internal orders to exchange ideas with colleagues around the world, Siemens employees strive Siemens AG Wittelsbacherplatz 2 LZF, Fürth-Bislohe continuously to increase company value. D-80333 Munich Intranet http://c4bs.spls.de/ We at Siemens do not measure value solely in terms of short-term profitability. For Federal Republic of Germany Fax +49 911 654-4271 Internet http://www.siemens.com German Order no. -
Wir Sind CSU Erlangen
November 2016 Gestern. Heute. Morgen. Wir sind CSU Erlangen. ahre 70 J en rlang CSU E en rzlich He ch! wuns Glück „Mein London“ Benefizkonzert mit den Nürnberger Symphonikern „Very british“ - so lässt sich das Neujahrskonzert 2017 unserer VR-Bank beschreiben. Erleben Sie Englands Hauptstadt musikalisch: in den Werken berühmter britischer Komponisten, interpretiert von den Nürnberger Symphonikern nach ihrem Qualitätsanspruch „Made in Nuremberg“. Am Dirigentenpult: Chefdirigent Alexander Shelley, der seine Geburtsstadt London perfekt zu inszenieren weiß. Programm: vr-bank-ehh.de/benefizkonzert Dienstag, 3. Januar 2017 Einlass: 18:30 Uhr - Beginn: 19:00 Uhr Heinrich-Lades-Halle, 91052 Erlangen Eintritt für VR-Mitglieder: 1. Kategorie -ausverkauft-, 2. Kategorie 21,50 Euro Eintritt für Nicht-Mitglieder: 1. Kategorie -ausverkauft-, 2. Kategorie 27,50 Euro Kinder/Jugendliche bis 16 Jahre: halber Preis Kartenbestellung: Telefon 09131 781-725, in unseren Filialen vr-bank-ehh.de/benefizkonzert – 70 Jahre CSU Erlangen – Wir sind CSU Erlangen. Gestern. Heute. Morgen. „Wir müssen uns immer wieder Grußwort Parteivorsitzender Horst Seehofer ....................................... 7 von neuem bemühen, die parlamen- Grußwort Kreisvorsitzende tarischen Prozesse der breiten Alexandra Wunderlich ........................... 9 Öffentlichkeit verständlich zu Gratulanten ......................................... 10 machen [...] und unsere Arbeit transparent und bürgernah gestalten“ in memoriam ....................................... 15 Dr. Wilhelm Vorndran CHRONIK -
Christine Johnson , Et Al. V. Siemens AG, Et Al. 09-CV-5310-Complaint
Case 1:09-cv-05310-JG -RER Document 1 Filed 12/04/09 Page 1 of 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRISTINE JOHNSON, Individually and On ^ 3' ^ o Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, VeO-9 Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION vs. ) COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS SIEMENS AG, ) Defendant. } a 0 DEMAND FOR JUR^A SUMMARY AND OVERVIEW REYES, M J 1. This is a federal class action on behalf of purchasers of the American Depository Receipt Shares ("ADRs" or "shares") of Siemens AG ("Siemens" or the "Company") between November 8, 2007 and April 30, 2008, inclusive ( the "Class Period"), seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act'). Siemens is a German based corporation which does substantial business in the United States through its various U.S. operations, with a focus in electronics and electrical engineering, and operating in the industry, energy and healthcare sectors. 2. As more fully set forth herein, Siemens has plead guilty in the United States to violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act') and the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (the "FCPA") by systemically and extensively engaging in illegal activities, including the establishment of sham businesses, phoney contracts, phantom invoices, shadow companies, mail and wire fraud, bribery, and money laundering, in order to obtain contracts or retain business for the Company. It knowingly used bagmen, elaborate payment schemes and secret off-book accounts to conceal bribery payments; mischaracterized Case 1:09-cv-05310-JG -RER Document 1 Filed 12/04/09 Page 2 of 39 bribes and kickbacks in corporate accounting records; circumvented and failed to maintain adequate internal controls; and failed to comply with the books and records provisions of the FCPA. -
Der Bedeutungszuwachs Betrieblicher Humaner Und Sozialer Ressourcen Im Lichte Der Krisensituation Der 1970Er Und 1980Er Jahre
Faktor Mensch Der Bedeutungszuwachs betrieblicher humaner und sozialer Ressourcen im Lichte der Krisensituation der 1970er und 1980er Jahre Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Philosophie an der Philosophischen Fakultät der Universität Potsdam vorgelegt von: Diplom-Kaufmann, Diplom-Volkswirt Kim-Holger Opel Potsdam 2016 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. André Steiner, Universität Potsdam Zweitgutachter: Prof. em. Dr. Toni Pierenkemper, Universität zu Köln Datum der mündlichen Prüfung: 7. Juni 2017 Online veröffentlicht auf dem Publikationsserver der Universität Potsdam: URN urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404767 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404767 Für Jannis und Niklas Vorwort An dieser Stelle möchte ich meinen besonderen persönlichen Dank nachstehenden Per- sonen entgegenbringen, ohne deren Mithilfe die Anfertigung dieser Promotionsschrift niemals zustande gekommen wäre: Mein Dank gilt zunächst Herrn Prof. Dr. André Steiner, meinem Doktorvater, und Herrn Prof. Dr. Toni Pierenkemper, meinem Zweitgutachter, für die hilfsbereite und wissen- schaftliche Betreuung dieser Arbeit. Die Gespräche waren immer ein bereichernder und konstruktiver Austausch, den ich als Ermutigung und Motivation empfunden habe. Des Weiteren möchte ich Herrn Alexander Huseby vom Centrum för Näringslivshistoria in Stockholm für seine ausgezeichnete Hilfe danken. Er gab mir nicht nur Zugang zu un- entbehrlichen Informationen und historischen Dokumenten schwedischer Unterneh- men, sondern war jederzeit Ansprechpartner für meine zahlreichen und unermüdli- chen fachlichen Fragen. Auch die vielen „nicht-wissenschaftlichen“ motivierenden Ge- spräche haben meine Arbeit sehr unterstützt. Mein weiterer Dank gilt den Mitarbeite- rinnen und Mitarbeitern der Universität Oxford und der Bodleian Library (insbesondere Herrn Michael Hughes) sowie des Siemens-Unternehmensarchivs in München in ihrer steht hilfsbereiten Unterstützung meiner Arbeit. Dankbar bin ich außerdem Herrn Prof. -
Siemens A.G. Business Information, Profile, and History
Siemens A.G. Business Information, Profile, and History http://companies.jrank.org/pages/3759/Siemens-G.html Wittelsbacherplatz 2 D 80333 Munich Germany Siemens A.G. is Europe's largest electrical and electronics company, producing over 50,000 products manufactured at 400 sites in 40 countries. Referring to the company's history of achieving success through well engineered refinements of other people's inventions, one Fortune analyst noted that "second is best" might well serve as Siemens' motto. But opportunism is not the only interesting facet of Siemens' history, which is also a story of a long family tradition and intimate involvement with some of the most important events of the 19th and 20th centuries. Siemens & Halske was founded in Berlin in 1847 by Werner Siemens and J. G. Halske to manufacture and install telegraphic systems. Siemens, a former artillery officer in the Prussian army and an engineer who already owned a profitable patent for electroplating, was the driving force behind the company and remained so for the rest of his life. The company received its first major commission in 1848, when it contracted to build a telegraph link between Berlin and Frankfurt. Construction of telegraph systems boomed in the mid 19th century, and Siemens & Halske was well equipped to take advantage of the situation. In 1853, it received a commission to build an extensive telegraph system in Russia. Upon its completion, the company opened an office in St. Petersburg under the direction of Werner Siemens' brother Carl Siemens. In 1857 Siemens & Halske helped develop the first successful deep sea telegraphic cable. -
Aufstellung Des Anteilsbesitzes Der Siemens AG Gemäß § 285 Nr.11Und Nr.11A HGB
Aufstellung des Anteilsbesitzes der Siemens AG gemäß § 285 Nr.11und Nr.11a HGB Ergebnis Eigen- Kapital- nach Steuern1) kapital1) anteil Stand 30.9.2001 in Mio. eur in Mio. eur in % I. Verbundene Unternehmen Deutschland Siemens Business Services GmbH & Co. OHG, München6) – 198 70100 Siemens Real Estate GmbH & Co. OHG, München6) 47 387 100 Osram GmbH, München 177 1.036 100 Infineon Technologies AG, München – 437 7.257 642) Siemens Financial Services GmbH, München 130 2.060 100 Siemens Duewag Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH, Krefeld – 43 10100 Siemens VDO Automotive AG, München – 449 863 75 Siemens Dematic AG, München – 383 206 100 Europa (ohne Deutschland) Siemens S.A., Brüssel 48 47 100 Siemens ATEA N.V., Herentals (Belgien) 13 21 100 Siemens A/S, Ballerup (Kopenhagen) 1 39 100 Siemens Osakeyhtiö, Espoo (Helsinki) 6 42 100 Siemens S.A.S., Saint-Denis (Paris) 040100 Siemens VDO Automotive S.A., Toulouse – 15 41 100 Siemens VDO Automotive Rambouillet S.A.S., Rambouillet 2 94 100 VDO Automotive España S.A., Barcelona 3 23 100 VDO Cèska republika spol. s.r.o., Brandys (Tschechische Republik) 8 23 100 Siemens A.E., Elektrotechnische Projekte und Erzeugnisse, Athen 1034 100 Siemens plc, Bracknell (London)3) 118 136 100 Siemens Ltd., Dublin 310100 Siemens S.p.A., Mailand3) 11 131 100 Siemens Nederland N.V., Den Haag3) 314 2.450100 Siemens A/S, Oslo – 5 52 100 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Österreich, Wien3) 245 640100 Siemens S.A., Lissabon3) 46 258 100 Siemens AB, Stockholm 615100 Siemens-Elema AB, Solna (Stockholm) 1 27 100 Siemens Building Technologies -
General Meeting 2008 Counterproposals
General Meeting 2008 Counterproposals As of May 20, 2008 Counterproposals Counterproposals received by us are classified into two groups: We designate with capital letters those counterproposals for which, if you wish to vote for them, you need only tick the appropriate capital letter on the reply form. In this case, too, however, please tick the appropri- ate box under the respective item on the agenda to indicate how you would like to vote in order to make sure that your vote is counted even if the counterproposal is not made, is retracted or, for some other reason, is not voted on at the General Meeting. The other counterproposals, which merely reject proposals by the Board of Managing Directors and the Supervisory Board, or by the Supervisory Board alone, are not designated with capital letters. If you wish to vote for these counterproposals, you must vote “No” to the respective item on the Agenda. For our ordinary General Meeting taking place on Thursday, May 29, 2008 in Frankfurt am Main, we have to date received the following counterproposals. The proposals and reasons are the authors’ views as notified to us. We have also placed assertions of fact in the Internet without changing or verifying them. Shareholder ThomaS VehlieS, langenhagen, re agenda iTem 9: Re Item 09 // “Election to the Supervisory Board” of the Agenda for the General Meeting of Deutsche Bank on May 29, 2008, I submit the counterproposal not to elect Professor Dr. von Pierer on to the Supervisory Board of Deutsche Bank. reaSonS What was probably the biggest scandal in German economic history in connection with “slush funds” took place while Professor Dr. -
Shareholder Proposals
Shareholder Proposals Shareholder Proposals for the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG on January 25, 2007 www.siemens.com Latest update: January 17, 2007 Below you find all shareholder proposals relating to items on the Agenda for the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on January 25, 2007, together with Management’s discussion thereon. This version of the Shareholder Proposals, prepared for the convenience of English- speaking readers, is a translation of the German original. For the purposes of inter- pretation the German text shall be authoritative and final. Hans-Walter Grünewälder, Wuppertal, has submitted the following shareholder proposals: With regard to Agenda Item 4, “To ratify the acts of the Managing Board” and Agenda Item 5 “To ratify the acts of the Supervisory Board”: Hans-Walter Grünewälder Brahmsstrasse 27 42289 Wuppertal 0202 62 17 57 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Corporate Finance Treasury Investor Relations (CF T 3) Wittelsbacherplatz 2 80333 Munich By telefax 089 636 32830 December 14, 2006 Counter-proposals to be voted on at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG on January 25, 2007 Ladies and gentlemen: At the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of Siemens AG to be held on January 25, 2007, I will present the following counter-proposals and request the shareholders present at the meeting to support my proposals: With regard to Agenda Item 4 “To ratify the acts of the Managing Board” and Agenda Item 5 “To ratify the acts of the Supervisory Board” Be it resolved that the acts of the two Boards are not ratified. Supporting statement: The Compensation Report of the Supervisory Board as published in the Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year from October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006 reads as follows: “The remuneration of the members of the Supervisory Board was determined at the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting through shareholder approval of a proposal of the Managing and Supervisory Boards.