DOCSLIB.ORG

I Participated in the Active Transportation Session Hosted by Rideau Vanier and Rideau Rockcliffe Because

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I Participated in the Active Transportation Session Hosted by Rideau Vanier and Rideau Rockcliffe Because APPENDIX B Comments and feedback (from participants) in order they were submitted: I participated in the Active transportation session hosted by Rideau Vanier and Rideau Rockcliffe because: • I joined tonight because I appreciate the improvements we've seen so far and to talk about other pieces we can bring to make cycling safer in Overbrook (Donald, Lola) and to make cycling to other close locations (ex. cycling to trainyards to do errands) • I was hit by a car as a pedestrian crossing the Vanier Parkway at Donald. Driver was turning left and did not look. I’m lucky to be alive and want to make sure pedestrians and cyclists stay safe in this area. • I joined because I live in Overbrook and appreciate the improvements to cycling etc. but I commute via cycling and walking, with my children, to École Mauril Belanger. I have concerns about Safety surrounding École Mauril Belanger (Montgomery street in particular), and routes to arrive there. • I joined because I was hit by a car as a pedestrian crossing the Vanier Parkway at Donald. Driver was turning left and did not look. I’m lucky to be alive and want to make sure pedestrians and cyclists stay safe in this area. • I joined because my family commutes by bike, we need better infrastructure - and also because we need speed limits and impediments on our neighbourhood streets for everyone's safety (kids playing, pedestrians and cyclists). • I joined to see what was being planned. I’m hoping to see something along Marier. Currently in rough shape. Pot holes at the intersection of Beechwood and Marier make the turn a bit dodgy. Also wanted to reiterate that paint on a busy roads does not make a cyclist safe. Physical barriers are the way to go. Thanks for the work on this. • I joined because I bike and walk. We need more bike lanes (finishing the Donald portion) and reducing speed limit will make active transportation safe • I joined tonight because I appreciate the improvements we've seen so far and to talk about other pieces we can bring to make cycling safer in Overbrook (Donald, Lola) and to make cycling to other close locations (ex. cycling to trainyards to do errands) Feedback and comments: • Speeding on Crichton • Simplifying cycling on Sussex near National Gallery • Improving access to cycling lane near American Embassy • Beechwood and Hemlock, in totality, esp. Cycling near Marier, Mackay/Beechwood for pedestrians, dangerous bus stops, conflict with cars in bike lanes • Safer cycling connections on Cummings Bridge • Better bike segregation on Somerset East • Improvements to cycling on McArthur between Olmstead and Vanier • More pedestrian advances/longer signals in general – King Edward/Templeton, York/Dalhousie, Clarence/Dalhousie. Crossing King Edward in general, to protect pedestrians from trucks. • More grade separated bike lanes. • One thing that I havent seen mentioned is those sneaky lights that look like they’re changing but - whoops - not. For example Cummings and Donald. • Somehow the bus stops at Charlevoix were overlooked. • We need separate standards for pothole filling for bikes and active transportation. Too often the patches are almost as uncomfortable as the potholes. • Adding segregated facilities to St Patrick St Bridge as part of renewal • Cycling facilities on Lola between Coventry and Donald • Cycling access to St Laurent LRT station • Cycling in the Byward Market • Collaborating with OCH to create a woonerf on King George • Adding a MUP to connect West Presland St and Vanier Pkwy at east end of Wright St • Partnering with NCC to widen/renew NCC pathways to support the user capacity • • King George Street as a woonerf • Wright Street multi-use pathway • New Active Transportation Plan and capital funding (lower your expectations) • Lighting safety audit at RCGT Park link to Max Keeping Bridge • OCH lands in Overbrook have no sidewalks • Cycling access between Overbrook and the St. Laurent LRT station • Laurent Boulevard transit priority EA • Lola Street cycling – sooner rather than later • Stop sign at George and William is insufficient protect for pedestrians • Northbound vehicle visibility at Montreal and Aviation • Montreal Rd east of St Laurent, lots of conflict between different road users • Access to Montfort Hospital • General maintenance of cycling facilities – standards should be different than those for vehicle lanes • Vanier Pkwy @ Donald – unsafe for pedestrians • Pour décourager la vitesse des voitures et mieux accommoder les piétons, la rue Crichton devrait voir une chaussée moins large et les trottoirs plus larges. Les voitures roulent rapidement, qui est une conséquence des chaussées larges. • That bicycle path on Sussex, around the National Gallery, to McKenzie is too complicated. And the posts that obstruct the entrance to the bicycle lane beside the American Embassy are dangerous for cyclists. • Safe biking throughout Beechwood and Hemlock. Currently danger zone around Marier. • Mackay and Beechwood is a confusing and stressful intersection for pedestrians and cyclists and cars • New Active Transportation Plan and capital funding (lower your expectations): At the last BBRN Vanier South/Overbrook meeting staff from transportation planning spoke of how the new Active Transportation Plan (replacing the current Pedestrian Plan and Cycling Plan) will likely only list target projects for the first ten years (not the full length of the plan to 2046). Capital funding for cycling projects for the whole of the City will be quite limited and probably only high priority projects (big impact, filling critical missing links, etc.) would make the cut to be on the list. It would appear there will be a very small likelihood of any such a project in Overbrook making the list. This will be disappointing. If this is so how will the ward councillor continue to support or secure cycling network improvements in Overbrook? • A general need for more sidewalks in residential/dense neighbourhoods • St-Laurent Boulevard transit priority EA: We have seen how the almost complete “Montreal-Blair Road Transit Priority Corridor Planning and Environmental Assessment Study” not only addresses the issue of transit priority put also how cycling and pedestrian activities in those corridors could be improved if the EA recommendations are approved, funded and implemented at some future time. We are aware that a similar study will be undertaken in the relatively near future for isolated (not continuous) transit priority measures along St. Laurent Boulevard. We are not certain of the segment for study (Highway 417 to Hemlock Road?). We also know that given the more narrow ROW width that this EA will in ways be more challenging than the Montreal Road – Blair Road one. We look forward to having this EA done as it will guide redevelopment plans for the use of the existing public ROW, widening ROW takings where required, and how private adjacent lands (generally commercial) will respect or contribute to the cycling and pedestrian improvements planned along their frontages. Will the three councillors involved along these segments of St. Laurent Boulevard impress upon their respective community associations the importance of the upcoming EA and the need to be involved in the process of preparation? • Current draft Official Plan will not require more sidewalks – R4 zones: It was very disappointing to see the policies of the draft Official Plan which do not really take forward any further the policies of where sidewalks should be added to neighbourhoods. It proposes to continue the same old policies of only having or requiring new sidewalks in a limited number of circumstances such as along collectors or arterial roadways, portions of streets leading to rapid transit, schools or parks, etc. Having a R4 zoning, the second highest density zoning category, which allows low-rise apartment buildings like the 34 unit building at 261 and 265 Columbus Avenue, would not qualify as a reason to require a new sidewalk. This is unacceptable. The reverse should happen – where there is R4 zoning a sidewalk must be provided (on one side of the street) unless it can be demonstrated why this should not be so. • OP creates corridors out of Hemlock, Beechwood to direct traffic into the market and across a new Alexandra Bridge. Putting emphasis on St Patrick creates increased risk for biking in the Market. More traffic into market does not seem to align with plans for the Market and Lowertown renewal. • OCH land include R4 zoning and no sidewalks: OCH land holding in Overbrook include a considerable number of properties along streets with R4 zoning. If the City cannot convince or require private developers along R4 zoned streets to, with rare exceptions e.g. it is a collector, provide any new sidewalks, how will it pressure OCH to remedy situations where new sidewalks should be provided, particularly if OCH is going to increase the density of its redeveloped sites? Will OCH and the City of Ottawa cooperate and improve the pedestrian environment of Overbrook by providing more sidewalks? • The new cycling lanes that are being added all seem to be half measures and band-aid solutions. If the City of Ottawa is serious about active transportation it will stop trying to please everybody (aka cars and parking) and implement proper cycling infrastructure and not half measures with the example of what is found on Beechwood avenue. • The curbs leading up to the MUP are terrible and pool sand and water at the entrance and exit points. Although in a different ward, Elgin street is a fine example of half measures which seems to have inspired Rideau Street as well. It's so discouraging to see one half-measure after another. just do it right the first time! We have Montreal as role model. Let's be inspired by their achievements and replicate them here in Ottawa. • The Market area is almost devoid of bicycle lanes.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uptown Rideau STREET COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN Draft V2 - November 2015
    UPTOWN RIDEAU STREET COMMUNITY DESIGN PLAN Draft v2 - November 2015 City of Ottawa Planning and Growth Management Ottawa.ca/planning Ottawa.ca/urbanisme CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................... 5 4.0 The Plan .................................................................... 51 1.1 What is a Community Design Plan? ....................................................... 7 4.1 General Approach ................................................................................ 52 1.2 2005 Uptown Rideau CDP ...................................................................... 7 4.2 Vision, Core Principles and Key Directions ............................................. 52 1.3 How to Use This CDP ............................................................................. 7 4.3 Built Form ............................................................................................ 54 1.4 The CDP Area ......................................................................................... 8 4.4 Open Space .......................................................................................... 68 1.5 Study Process ......................................................................................... 8 4.5 Mobility .............................................................................................. 74 1.6 As We Heard It .................................................................................... 10 4.6 Heritage ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vanier’S Changing Identity Through New Urban Infrastructure
    Recording Vanier’s Changing Identity Through New Urban Infrastructure by Hugo Béland-Latreille A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in SDUWLDOIXOÀOOPHQWRIWKHUHTXLUHPHQWVIRUWKHGHJUHHRI Master of Architecure Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2015 Hugo Béland-Latreille Abstract This thesis explores questions of RI 9DQLHU 7KH VLWH LWVHOI GHVLJQDWHG E\ identity and the character of a place. the City of Ottawa as a “gateway” to the It will also deal with how this place QHLJKERXUKRRGGHDOVZLWKYDULRXVGHVLJQ maintains its individuality, or its genius challenges such as a connection to the ORFL GHÀQHG DV D VSHFLDO LUUHSODFHDEOH rest of the city, to the Rideau River, and quality that joins it to its greater context. a mediation of scale differences in the The intention is to create a vessel for the VXUURXQGLQJ XUEDQ IDEULF ,W DOVR GHDOV preservation of the existing identity of with sociopolitical challenges such as a place for its existing residents, while XUEDQLQWHQVLÀFDWLRQJHQWULÀFDWLRQDQG evolving to accommodate new residents. cultural identity. The design proposal 8UEDQVWUDWHJLHVDUHGLDJUDPPDWLFDOO\ DLPV WR VHW VWDQGDUGV IRU ZKDW ZLOO EH developed across greater Vanier, a DUJXHG DV ´UHVSRQVLEOH DUFKLWHFWXUHµ working-class, traditionally Francophone 7KHVHVWDQGDUGVDLPWRHVWDEOLVKSRVLWLYH QHLJKERXUKRRG WKH VSHFLÀF VLWH WR examples in the development of the EH GHYHORSHG DUFKLWHFWXUDOO\ IRU WKLV UDSLGO\ HYROYLQJ QHLJKERXUKRRG RI project is situated on the western edge Vanier. acknowledgements First of all, I want to thank my parents WKURXJKRXW WKH \HDUV EHFDPH D IULHQG who’ve always supported my education DQGPHQWRU<RXWUXO\EULQJRXWWKHEHVW DQG SXVKHG PH WR EHFRPH WKH FXULRXV in people, so thank you. SHUVRQ,DPWRGD\1RQHRIWKLVZRXOGEH SRVVLEOHZLWKRXWWKHVHWZRLQVSLUDWLRQDO ÀJXUHVLQP\OLIH I want to thank Izza, my girlfriend, for EHLQJ P\ PXVH )RU DOZD\V EHLQJ WKHUH for me in thick and thin, you were always KDSS\ WR KHOS DQG FRQWLQXH WR EH D ELJ part of my success.
    [Show full text]
  • 112 Montreal Road
    112 Montreal Road Planning Rationale Zoning By-law Amendment + Official Plan Amendment May 17, 2021 Prepared for 2705460 ONTARIO INC. Prepared by Fotenn Planning + Design 396 Cooper Street, Suite 300 Ottawa, ON K2P 2H7 May 2021 © Fotenn The information contained in this document produced by Fotenn is solely for the use of the Client identified above for the purpose for which it has been prepared and Fotenn undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1 Application Summary 1 1.2 Subject Site 2 1.3 Site Location and Context 2 1.4 Transportation 3 2.0 Proposed Development 6 3.0 Policy & Regulatory Framework 12 3.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2020) 12 3.2 City of Ottawa Official Plan (2003, as amended) 13 Managing Growth 13 Traditional Mainstreet Designation 14 Designing Ottawa 18 Urban Design and Compatibility 18 3.3 New Ottawa Official Plan (Anticipated 2021-2046) 25 3.4 Montreal Road District Secondary Plan 26 3.5 Urban Design Guidelines for High-Rise Buildings 28 3.6 Urban Design Guidelines for Development along Traditional Mainstreets 29 4.0 Zoning By-law 31 4.1 Zoning Description 31 4.2 Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment 35 5.0 Conclusions 36 1.0 1 Introduction Fotenn Planning + Design (“Fotenn”) was retained by 2705460 ONTARIO INC.to assess a development proposal as per the current and applicable policies and to prepare a Planning Rationale in support of an application for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment relating to a site located at 112 Montreal Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Bridge Engineering, and a New Bridge Over a Unesco World Heritage Site
    CHANGES IN BRIDGE ENGINEERING, AND A NEW BRIDGE OVER A UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE SITE William Victor Anderson, P.Eng., Executive Vice President, Delcan Sylvain Montminy, P.Eng., Division Manager, Delcan Abdol Nouraeyan, P.Eng., Program Manager, City of Ottawa Marcel Delph, P.Eng., Senior Project Manager, City of Ottawa Paper prepared for presentation at the STRUCTURES: BRIDGES IN A CLIMATE OF CHANGE Session of the 2009 Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada Vancouver, British Columbia ABSTRACT Some 35 years ago the St. Patrick Street Bridge over the Rideau River in the City of Ottawa was replaced. It was proposed that the new bridge be an arch bridge, replacing the existing functionally obsolete multi-span concrete arch which had been at the site since the 1920s, but respectful of the heritage of the site and the crossing. However, in the then-prevailing climate of bridge design, a more conventional post-tensioned concrete multi-span slab bridge was selected for design, and it was constructed in 1975. It might be described as functional but perhaps uninspiring. Since then the steel box girder Hunt Club Bridge has been constructed over the Rideau River, and the Cummings Bridge has been rehabilitated, amongst other bridge works over the river. Similarly the Bank Street Arch Bridge and the Plaza Bridge over the Rideau Canal have been restored. As well, in the intervening years the Rideau Canal has now been designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, and is on the National Register of Historic Sites in Canada. It is now proposed that another new bridge over the Rideau River and Rideau Canal be constructed near the south limit of the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Rideau River - Rideau Falls Catchment Lower Rideau River Subwatershed Report 2012
    RIDEAU RIVER - RIDEAU FALLS CATCHMENT LOWER RIDEAU RIVER SUBWATERSHED REPORT 2012 The RVCA produces individual reports for 16 catchments in the Lower Rideau subwatershed. Using data collected and analysed by the RVCA through its watershed monitoring and land cover classification programs, surface water quality conditions are reported for the Rideau River along with a summary of environmental conditions for the surrounding countryside every six years. This information is used to help better understand the effects of human activity on our water resources, allows us to better track environmental change over time and helps focus watershed management actions where they are needed the most. The following pages of this report are a compilation of that work. For other Lower Rideau catchments and Lower Rideau Subwatershed Report, please visit the RVCA website at www.rvca.ca. Inside 1. Surface Water Quality Conditions 2 Rideau River 2 2. Riparian Conditions 8 Overbank Zone 8 Fish Community 8 3. Land Cover 9 4. Watershed Protection 10 5. Issues 11 6. Opportunities for Action 11 Catchment Facts navigation levels on the Rideau Contains a warm/cool water recreational Waterway) and baitfish fishery with 40 fish species An intensively, urbanized reach within Flood vulnerable communities include Water quality rating along the Rideau the City of Ottawa with some large portions of New Edinburgh, Vanier River is fair at Billings Bridge, over a six expanses of green space found along (Kingsview Park), Old Ottawa East and year reporting period (2006-2011). At the the river corridor; the only reach in the Old Ottawa South Cummings Bridge (in Vanier), the water Lower Rideau that remains in its riverine quality rating is fair with no change form, without having been substantially Risk of ice jam-induced flooding at spring observed over a 12 year reporting period altered for navigation break-up throughout the entire reach, but (2000-2005 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Year in Review the Proposed CHUM Tower
    Established in 1967 Winter 1999 Celebrating our 30th year Volume 25, No. 4 Dedicated to Preserving Our Built Heritage CHUM now has City support to The President’s Report — erect its enormous tower in the Bytown Market. Visually offensive, The Year in Review monstrously out of scale, destruc- tive of the heritage integrity of this By Carolyn Quinn designated Heritage District, and, we now know, unnecessary for its This past year has been a busy one for sector company Eau Vive, who provided stated broadcast purposes. both canoe and boatman. Six other Heritage Ottawa. The organization has Byward Market resident John informative and unique tours kept partici- successfully fulfilled its mandate to edu- Edwards has been following the pants returning for more! cate and inform residents and visitors of curious twisted story and submits A special thank you goes out to all the city’s valuable heritage buildings and this probe of the strange goings-on. districts. The armchair and walking tours the intrepid volunteer guides who con- exposed many to the benefits of heritage tribute so much to the success of these conservation practice, however, our valuable tours: John Leaning, Terry advocacy work has been arguably less deMarsh, Fern Graham, Judy Deegan, The Proposed successful in meeting our preservation Glenn Lockwood, Louisa Coates and goals. Mark Brandt. Thank you one and all!! February and March saw the pre- Heritage Ottawa was also an active CHUM Tower participant in several events celebrating sentation of five instructive and entertain- If Moses Znaimer and CHUM, his the city’s history and heritage including ing slide-shows where topics ranged Toronto-based radio and television con- Heritage Day ceremonies hosted at All from the fascinating landscape history of glomerate, have their way, a 127-foot Saints’ Church in Sandy Hill, Colonel By the Central Experimental Farm by histori- tower, equivalent in height to a 10-storey Day activities and more recently Bytown an Edwinna von Baeyer, to a highly infor- building, will be erected on a squat 2- Days in the Byward Market.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMO / NOTEDESERVICE Information Previously
    M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E Information previously distributed / Information distribué auparavant TO: Members of Transportation Committee DESTINATAIRE : Membre du comité des transports FROM: John L. Moser, Contact : General Manager, Planning and Growth Vivi Chi, Manager, Management Department Transportation Planning, Planning and Growth Management (613) 580-2424 x 21877, [email protected] EXPÉDITEUR : John L. Moser, Personne ressource : Directeur général, Urbanisme et Gestion Vivi Chi, Gestionnaire, de la croissance Planification des transports, Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424 x 21877, [email protected] DATE: September 22, 2014 22 septembre 2014 FILE NUMBER: ACS2014-PAI-PGM-0220 SUBJECT: Active Mobility Memo OBJET : Note de service sur la mobilité active The purpose of this memorandum is to provide members of the Transportation Committee (TRC) with supplementary information on active mobility investments further to the cycling and pedestrian updates provided by staff at TRC on June 4, 2014 and September 3, 2014, respectively. Cycling In June, staff provided an overview of the city's cycling program, including Term of Council achievements, and investments for 2014 and beyond. Further to questions at Committee, below is additional information on the status of cycling initiatives, results of inter-departmental collaboration, maintenance and renewal standards, as well as cycling safety, and tourism initiatives. Status of Cycling Initiatives and Additional Funding Sources Overall, 214 new kilometres will be added
    [Show full text]
  • The Oldest House in Vanier, the Future Workers' Heritage Centre
    Dedicated to Preserving Our Built Heritage Spring/Summer 2007 Volume 34, No. 2 The Oldest House in Vanier, the future Workers’ Heritage Centre By Ken Clavette he oldest known building in Vanier and was destined to become Vanier will soon become the the home of the Vanier Museum T home for Ottawa’s workers’ until amalgamation opened up history. The small home at 306 space in the former City Hall Cyr Ave. and known as Gamman (which is where Museo parc House was owned by the City of Vanier is now located). The result of the change was an empty building e with no city budget for maintenance. So a partnership was formed The Nathaniel Gamman family. Circa 1870s. between the Ottawa and Heritage Centr District Labour Council and orkers’ the City to have the Workers’ Heritage Centre (WHC) established and use the building as a museum and interpretation centre. The Gamman House is a modest one-and- a-half story, mansard-roofed, wood frame cottage constructed in 1875 by Nathaniel and Mary Gamman, early residents of the area. The house was part of the community of Janeville that developed along Montreal Road from the Cummings Bridge in the 1870s. Its boundaries were the Rideau River to the west, Deschamps to the north, the former Vanier/ Ottawa municipal Family photo: Donated by the Gamman family to W boundary to the east and McArthur to the south. Assessment rolls show that many large land hold- ings in this area were divided up into smaller ones in the 1870s and houses were built on the new lots.
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT RIDEAU RIVER (HURDMANʼS) BRIDGES, MTO SITE No
    CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT RIDEAU RIVER (HURDMANʼS) BRIDGES, MTO SITE No. 3-073/1-2 HIGHWAY 417 (OTTAWA QUEENSWAY) LOT G, CONCESSION D, RIDEAU FRONT GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NEPEAN & LOT 11, JUNCTION GORE GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO GWP 4320-06-00 / GWP 4091-07-00 September 2011 Prepared for: MMM Group Limited Prepared by: CULTURAL HERITAGE EVALUATION REPORT RIDEAU RIVER (HURDMANʼS) BRIDGES MTO SITE No. 3-073/1-2 HIGHWAY 417 (OTTAWA QUEENSWAY) LOT G, CONCESSION D, RIDEAU FRONT GEOGRAPHIC TOWNSHIP OF NEPEAN & LOT 11, JUNCTION GORE GEOGRPAHIC TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER CITY OF OTTAWA, ONTARIO GWP 4320-06-00 / GWP 4091-07-00 September 2011 Prepared for: MMM Group Limited 1145 Hunt Club Road, Suite 300 Ottawa, ON, K1V 0Y3 Prepared by: Unterman McPhail Associates Heritage Resource Management Consultants 540 Runnymede Road Toronto, Ontario, M6S 2Z7 Tel: 416-766-7333 PROJECT PERSONNEL Unterman McPhail Associates Richard Unterman, Principal Barbara McPhail, Principal Jean Simonton Heritage Consultant TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 3 2.1 Nepean Township 3 2.2 Gloucester Township 5 2.3 Railway Development 7 2.4 Growth of the National Capital 8 2.5 The Queensway and the Rideau River (Hurdman’s) Bridges 10 2.6 Concrete T-beam Structures 15 2.7 Bridge Designer 16 3.0 CULTURAL HERITAGE LANDSCAPE DESCRIPTION 17 3.1 Area Context 17 3.2 Site 18 4.0 BUILT HERITAGE RESOURCE DESCRIPTION 19 4.1 Rideau River (Hurdman’s) Bridges, MTO Site No. 3-073/1-2 19 4.1.1 Modifications 21 4.1.2 Comparative
    [Show full text]
  • Official Catalogue and Guide to the Grand Dominion and 39Th Provincial Exhibition at Ottawa, September 22Nd to 27Th, 1884
    PRICE, lO CENTS. I ^\^S1 Agricultural and Arts Association OF ONTARIO. OFFICIAL CATALOGUE AND GUIDE THE >- .^- =^=3~r-TO <f«£^? GRAND DOMINION- ° 39th PROVINCIAL - g>eptemS>ev 22«6 fo 27i§, 1884. <_£^ EMBRACING^}-' Programme of Sports during Fair Week — UNDER THE MANAGEMENT C ->#THE LOCAL COMMITTEES CATALOGUE OF ENTRIES OF HORSES AND CATTLE ("^rALSO,^-? Description of Ottawa and its Surroundings, Bv W P. LETT, Esq. City Clerk. PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY A. S. WOODBURN, OTTAWA Ottawa Temperance Cofi'ee House, 110 Sparks Street L'/V.i LS AT ALL II FULL DTXXKI!. ' The EDITH and LORNE PIERCE COLLECTION of CANADIANA Pi Queen's University at Do Kingston Highest Award wherever Exhibited. I© 1L© ORjR'JL-J^ «^ C 9 Wholesale and Itetail Agents, Sparks Street, OTTAWA, Ont THE CELEBRATED Cook's Friend BAKING POWDE1 — IS- Pure, Safe, Economical I always reliable It is absolutely free from any injurious ingredients, and may be used with advantage 'in food for persons of the most delicate constitution. It is as useful in the kitchen as salt, being an indispensable ingredient in Biscuits, Pancakes, Johnny Cakes, Pie Crust and any form of Pastry where lightness is valued. It saves three quarters of the usual shorten- ing when such is to be used. Purchasers should be careful to obtain the genuine Cook's Friend ; any variation from or addition to this name is not genuine. Manufactured only by "W. ID. MOLAREKT, Montreal, And may be purchased at retail from all respectable Grocers and Store- keepers in the Dominion. THE Prober Manufacturing fa. -MANUFACTURERS OF- Tie Patent Prosser Self-Fliislrii Service Cistern, The newest and most perfect system invented, combining all the advantages of the modern high priced imported closets at less than half their cost.^ Self-acting.
    [Show full text]
  • American Three-Toed Woodpecker
    Ottawa Rare Birds Catalogue of Occurrences Last update: 18 July 2013 Key Shading: Green shading – Accepted - occurrences that have been submitted to the Ottawa Birds Records Subcommittee (OBRSC) and accepted. Orange shading – Rejected - occurrences that have been submitted to the Ottawa OBRSC and rejected. Where possible, the reasons for rejection are reported. Rejected occurrences do not mean that the bird in question was not observed, only that the documentation provided to the OBRSC was not adequate to confirm the identification. No shading – Unreviewed – occurrences described in print (Trail & Landscape, North American Birds and its predecessors; the Shrike, the Ottawa Citizen, etc.) or on the internet (Ontbirds, etc.) but not submitted to the OBRSC for review. Grey Shading – Historical – records prior to 1969 (the date when regular bird sightings began to be published in Trail and Landscape) for which any form of documentation other than published reports or museum specimens are unavailable. Abbreviations AB – American Birds BSL – Ottawa Bird Status Line CFN – Canadian Field Naturalist EPOQ – sightings database for Quebec managed by Regroupment QuébecOiseaux FN – Field Notes NAB – North American Birds OB – Ontario Birds OBRSC – Ottawa Bird Records Subcommittee o (A) – accepted report (OBRSC or OBRC) o (R) – rejected report (OBRSC or OBRC) o (NV) – no vote on report (OBRSC) o (D) – voting report deferred pending further information (OBRSC) OBRC – Ontario Bird Records Committee OttNat – Ottawa Naturalist T&L – Trail and Landscape Fulvous Whistling-Duck Dendrocygne fauve (Dendrocygna bicolor) FUWD Accidental visitor in spring and fall. This species is known in the Ottawa- Gatineau area from only 3 historical records, all from the Ottawa River near Thurso, QC in the mid-1960’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Synopsis
    Final Draft Transportation Master Plan Update Study Rapid Transit and Transit Priority Development Report Submitted to City of Ottawa by IBI Group in association with Morrison Hershfield September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Policy Guidance and Context .............................................................. 3 2.1 Transit Facility Types ......................................................................................... 3 2.2 Implications of Time Savings ............................................................................ 7 2.2.1 Mode Choice and Land Use ................................................................................. 7 2.2.2 Operating Costs .................................................................................................... 8 3. Modelling the Transit Network ............................................................ 9 3.1 Land Use .............................................................................................................. 9 3.2 Operating Speed ............................................................................................... 10 3.3 Service Headway ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]