DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesotho Youth Empowerment Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesotho Youth Empowerment Survey Lesotho Youth Empowerment Survey 2012 © Government of the Kingdom of Lesotho May 2014, Maseru Photo Credits: UNDP HelpLesotho.org Edited by: Setšabi Setšabi-Project Coordinator, Empowering Youth For Development, UNDP Designed & Printed by: The Agency (www.theagency.co.ls) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE ......................................................................................................................................... VII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................VIII TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... III LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................... IX LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................... X LIST OF ACRONYMS .......................................................................................................................... XI LIST OF DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................XII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................XII 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 RATIONALE OF THE SURVEY ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 REPORT OUTLINE ................................................................................................................................... 2 2. SURVEY METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 3 2.1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. SAMPLING AND SAMPLING PROCEDURE ...................................................................................................... 3 2.2.1. Sampling Frame ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.2.2. Sample Size Determination .................................................................................................... 3 2.2.3. Allocation of the Sample ......................................................................................................... 3 2.2.4. SELECTION OF HOUSEHOLDS AND RESPONDENTS ....................................................................................... 4 2.3. DATA COLLECTION ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.4. RESPONSE RATE................................................................................................................................... 4 2.5. DATA PROCESSING ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.5.1. Field Editing of the Questionnaires ......................................................................................... 5 2.5.2. Offi ce Editing and Coding of the Questionnaires .................................................................... 5 2.5.3. Data Entry ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.5.4. Verifi cation ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.5.5. Electronic Editing and Cleaning .............................................................................................. 5 2.5.6. Data Documentation and Linkage .......................................................................................... 5 2.6. Analysis and Report Writing ...................................................................................................... 5 3. YOUTH DEMOGRAPHY .................................................................................................................... 6 3.1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................... 6 3.2. YOUTH POPULATION DISTRIBUTION............................................................................................................ 6 3.3. HOUSEHOLD HEADSHIP .......................................................................................................................... 7 3.4. ORPHANHOOD ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3.5. MARITAL STATUS .................................................................................................................................. 9 3.6. YOUTH FERTILITY ................................................................................................................................. 9 3.7. MORTALITY........................................................................................................................................ 11 3.8. DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................................... 11 3.8.1. Basic Youth Demographics ................................................................................................... 11 3.8.2. Geospatial Distribution of the Youth Population ................................................................... 12 3.8.3. Orphanhood and Household Headship ................................................................................. 12 3.8.4. Marriage and Fertility ........................................................................................................... 13 3.9. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Page III Lesotho Youth Empowerment Survey 2012 4. EDUCATION ...................................................................................................................................14 4.1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................... 14 4.2. YOUTH EVER ATTENDED SCHOOL ............................................................................................................ 14 4.3. YOUTH ENROLMENT AT PRIMARY SCHOOL AND SECONDARY SCHOOL ............................................................... 15 4.4. ENROLMENT IN TERTIARY INSTITUTIONS .................................................................................................. 17 4.5. SCHOOL ATTENDANCE AND DROP-OUT ..................................................................................................... 18 4.6. YOUTH EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT ......................................................................................................... 19 4.7. LEVELS OF SESOTHO AND ENGLISH LITERACY ............................................................................................ 20 4.8. REASONS FOR DROPPING OUT................................................................................................................ 20 4.9. SOLUTIONS TO DROP-OUT PROBLEM ........................................................................................................ 22 4.10. RATING RELEVANCE OF LESOTHO’S EDUCATION SYSTEM ............................................................................. 22 4.11. DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................................... 23 4.11.1. Attendance .......................................................................................................................... 23 4.11.2. Youth Enrolment at Primary................................................................................................ 23 4.11.3. School Attendance and Drop-out ........................................................................................ 23 4.11.4. Youth Educational Attainment ............................................................................................. 24 4.11.5. Levels of Sesotho and English literacy ............................................................................... 24 4.11.6. Reasons for Dropping-out ................................................................................................... 24 4.11.7. Solutions to Drop-out Problem ........................................................................................... 24 4.11.8. Rating the Relevance of Lesotho Education System .......................................................... 24 4.12. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lesotho's Technology Needs Assessment
    Lesotho Meteorological Services Ministry of Natural Resources ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE TECHNOLOGY NEEDS IN LESOTHO Energy and Land Use Change and Forestry TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE i LIST OF ACRONYMS ii LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED iii I. BACKGROUND 1 Socio-economic conditions 1 National development objectives 1 Poverty alleviation 1 Employment creation 1 Social integration 2 Conservation of the land base 2 The future path of development 4 The role of science and technology in development 4 Agro-climatic conditions 5 Climate change scenarios 5 The draft technology development policy 6 International and regional perspectives 7 II. NATIONAL EXPERIENCES 10 Introduction 10 Agricultural research 10 Appropriate technology research 11 Labour-intensive construction 12 Rural water supplies 13 The rural sanitation programme 13 Low-cost housing development 14 Other initiatives 14 Technology registration 15 Technology transfer mechanisms 15 Shows, fairs and exhibitions 15 Extension services 15 Radio and other services 16 III. TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND TRAINING 17 Introduction 17 Current education and training policies 17 Curriculum development 18 School programmes 20 Technical and vocational training 21 University and other tertiary training 22 Other related initiatives 23 Industrial training and support 23 Small contractor training 24 Skills training 24 Trades testing 24 IV. TECHNOLOGY NEEDS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR 26 Introduction 26 Challenging issues 28 Sector Institutions 29 Overall policies and strategies 30 Options for Technology Transfer in the Sector 32 Renewable energy technologies 32 Hydro-power development 33 Solar photovoltaic technologies 34 Solar thermal technologies 34 Wind energy 35 Biogas technology 35 Energy Conservation 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in the residential sector 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in commerce and industry 36 Energy efficiency/conservation in the transport sector 37 Energy efficiency/conservation in government buildings 37 Passive solar design in buildings 37 Energy efficient cooking devices/stoves 37 Energy auditing 38 V.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 09 30 USG Southern Africa Fact Sheet #3
    Fact Sheet #3 Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 Southern Africa – Regional Disasters SEPTEMBER 30, 2020 SITUATION AT A GLANCE 10.5 765,000 5.4 1.7 320,000 MILLION MILLION MILLION Estimated Food- Estimated Confirmed Estimated Food-Insecure Estimated Severely Estimated Number Insecure Population in COVID-19 Cases in Population in Rural Food-Insecure of IDPs in Southern Africa Southern Africa Zimbabwe Population in Malawi Cabo Delgado IPC – Sept. 2020 WHO – Sept. 30, 2020 ZimVAC – Sept. 2020 IPC – Sept. 2020 WFP – Sept. 2020 Increasing prevalence of droughts, flooding, and other climatic shocks has decreased food production in Southern Africa, extending the agricultural lean season and exacerbating existing humanitarian needs. The COVID-19 pandemic and related containment measures have worsened food insecurity and disrupted livelihoods for urban and rural households. USG partners delivered life-saving food, health, nutrition, protection, shelter, and WASH assistance to vulnerable populations in eight Southern African countries during FY 2020. TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT HUMANITARIAN FUNDING USAID/BHA1,2 $202,836,889 For the Southern Africa Response in FY 2020 State/PRM3 $19,681,453 For complete funding breakdown with partners, see detailed chart on page 6 Total $222,518,3424 1USAID’s Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/BHA) 2 Total USAID/BHA funding includes non-food humanitarian assistance from the former Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and emergency food assistance from the former Office of Food for Peace (USAID/FFP). 3 U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (State/PRM) 4 This total includes approximately $30,914,447 in supplemental funding through USAID/BHA and State/PRM for COVID-19 preparedness and response activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Acute Food Insecurity Phase Classification
    INTEGRATED ACUTE FOOD INSECURITY PHASE CLASSIFICATION MAY 16/MAR 17 THE KINGDOM OF LESOTHO IPC analysis conducted from 24 to 30 May 2016 for all 10 districts of Lesotho based on primary data collected by LVAC and partners in May 2016 and secondary data collected from Jan. 2016 onwards. Projected analysis requires an update in October 2016. AGGREGATE NUMBERS FOR WORST PERIOD KEY FOOD INSECURITY OUTCOMES AS OF MAY 2016 – JULY TO OCTOBER 2016 – Despite current analysis corresponding to harvest/post-harvest Proportions of households and number of people in need of urgent period, 19% of households had poor food consumption, and 45% had support to protect their livelihoods and reduce food gaps and classified borderline food consumption. using IPC1: In Berea, Mafeteng, Mohale’s Hoek, Quthing and Thaba-Tseka, over Thaba-Tseka 40% (48,903 people) 20% of the rural households spent more than 75% of their cash in Maseru 25% (55,623 people) food purchase. In other districts the same expenditure pattern is Mafeteng 45% (67,204 people) experienced by 10-16% of rural households. Qacha’s Nek 45% (23,950 people) Generally, 13% of households engaged in crisis and emergency Leribe 35% (86,918 people) livelihood coping strategies, indicating that households reduced food Mohale’s Hoek 33% (50,245 people) consumption rather than depleting livelihood assets Quthing 43% (48,448 people) Global Acute Malnutrition was below 5% in all districts except in Mokhotlong 25% (23,625 people) Mohale’s Hoek, which had a GAM prevalence of 6.6%. Butha Buthe 20% (16,616 people) Berea 51% (88,725 people) Total Approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Operational Plan COP 2019 Strategic Direction Summary April 5, 2019
    Country Operational Plan COP 2019 Strategic Direction Summary April 5, 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Goal Statement ................................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context ................................................................................... 6 2.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and country profile ............................................................ 6 2.2 Investment Profile ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 National Sustainability Profile Update ...................................................................................... 15 2.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to disease burden .................................... 16 2.5 Stakeholder Engagement ............................................................................................................ 19 3.0 Geographic and Population Prioritization ................................................................................... 20 4.0 Program Activities for Epidemic Control in Scale-Up Locations and Populations .................... 22 4.1 Finding the missing, getting them on treatment, and retaining them ensuring viral suppression ...................................................................................................................................... 22 4.1.1. Adult Women 15+ years .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • "TV D>( 14 Zdthd
    ( l ? 1 ) 0 MAFETENG TOWN : ITS ECONOMIC STRUCTURE AND REGIONAL FUNCTIONS INSTITUTE OPj£ 1 1 APR 1934 ■ MVtlOmiOT STUDIES U G iU ftY t J f m "TV d>( 14 ZdTHD ^ Durban and regional planning programme t> DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY N.U.L. ROMA LESOTHO AFRICA (RESEARCH REPORTj I Henk Huismpn 1S83 X t > u i Preface For the research programme undertaken in the context of the Urban and Regional Planning Programme, established at the National University of Lesotho in 1978, emphasis has been put on the spatial organization of develooment efforts and activities in the rural areas of Lesotho. This focus on the rural parts of the country also includes an assess­ ment of the role of urban centres in providing both agricultural and non-agricultursl services to the rural populati on. The present report focusses on the only urban centre in the Mafeteng District, viz. Mafeteng town. Services provided from the centre to the district's population are analysed in relation to the town 1s internal production structure. The information for this report was collected in 1981 by means of a sample survey of households and a number of special studies in which attention was paid to specific aspects of the urban economy and the town's population which were considered crucial for the analysis of structure and function of the town. The report should be seen as the urban counterpart to the URPP research report on households, production and resources in Mafeteng District, which was published in 1987. These reports will be followed by a planning survey of Mafeteng District, which contains an analysis of the district economy.
    ( 14 Zdthd" class="panel-rg color-a">[Show full text]
  • Social Fences M ... Sotho and Eastern Cape.Pdf
    Extensive livestock production remains a significant part of livelihoods in many parts of southern Africa where land is not held in freehold, including Lesotho and the former 'homeland' of Transkei, now part of the Eastern Cape province of South Africa. In such areas, sustainable livestock production requires some form of community based range management. Based on field research and project support work in the Maluti District of the former Transkei and the Mohale's Hoek and Quthing Districts of southern Lesotho, this paper explores the contrasting views of community based range management that prevail in the two countries. It aims to reveal the social and economic tensions that exist between social fencing approaches and metal fencing approaches, and to highlight the different perceptions of governance and institutional roles that result from the two countries' political experiences over the 20* century. This comparative discussion should yield policy lessons for both countries, and the wider region. The Drakensberg escarpment separates two very different experiences of governance and resource management in these two areas. In southern Lesotho, chiefs continue to play a strong role in local government and natural resource management. Cattle, sheep and goats still play an important role in local livelihoods. Livestock are herded by boys and young men. Grazing areas, demarcated by natural features or beacons, are unfenced. They are opened and closed by the chiefs sitting in council with senior men of the community, who also punish infringements of local range management rules. Like their Xhosa-speaking neighbours in the former Transkei homeland area of the Eastern Cape, Basotho have suffered heavily from stock theft over the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesotho Mapping
    Kingdom of Lesotho Multi-sectoral Mapping of Nutrition Actions Data 2017 Outline of the presentation 1. Overview of the mapping exercise 2. Nutrition Stakeholder & Action Mapping in Lesotho 3. Analysis at national level 4. Review of some actions, with geographic and population coverage repartition at district level 5. Comparison of nutrition problems per district with the nutrition interventions 6. Next steps 2 Nutritional context in Lesotho Context in Lesotho Nutrition situation • Chronic and acute malnutrition in children under five years have decreased since 2004, however stunting is high (33.2%*) and remains above the WHO public health threshold ; • Across all districts, the prevalence of wasting is low (under 5%*) according to WHO classification ; • The prevalence of anemia in children under five years has remained a critical public health issue in the recent years*. Political commitment • In 2014, the Kingdom of Lesotho joined the SUN Movement with a letter of commitment from Prime Minister. • The Government of Lesotho established the Food and Nutrition Coordinating Office (FNCO), initially under the Ministry of Agriculture and then later under the Prime Minister office. • Five SUN Networks established : business, research and academia, media, civil society and the UN. However the UN Network is the only one that is fully functional. • Several multisectoral committees under FNCO coordination are operating in addressing nutrition issues in Lesotho. • A High-level nutrition forum held in October 2018 showcased the importance given to
    [Show full text]
  • Second State Of
    Second State of the Environment 2002 Report Lesotho Lesotho Second State of the Environment Report 2002 Authors: Chaba Mokuku, Tsepo Lepono, Motlatsi Mokhothu Thabo Khasipe and Tsepo Mokuku Reviewer: Motebang Emmanuel Pomela Published by National Environment Secretariat Ministry of Tourism, Environment & Culture Government of Lesotho P.O. Box 10993, Maseru 100, Lesotho ISBN 99911-632-6-0 This document should be cited as Lesotho Second State of the Environment Report for 2002. Copyright © 2004 National Environment Secretariat. All rights reserved. No parts of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior permission of the publisher. Design and production by Pheko Mathibeli, graphic designer, media practitioner & chartered public relations practitioner Set in Century Gothic, Premium True Type and Optima Lesotho, 2002 3 Contents List of Tables 8 Industrial Structure: Sectoral Composition 34 List of Figures 9 Industrial Structure: Growth Rates 36 List of Plates 10 Population Growth 37 Acknowledgements 11 Rural to Urban Migration 37 Foreword 12 Incidence of Poverty 38 Executive Summary 14 Inappropriate Technologies 38 State and impacts: trends 38 Introduction 24 Human Development Trends 38 Poverty and Income Distribution 44 Socio-Economic and Cultural Environment. 26 Agriculture and Food Security 45 People, Economy and Development Ensuring Long and Healthy Lives 46 Socio-Economic Dimension 26 Ensuring
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Bulletin Mozambique Zinbabwe Namibia Botswana Madagascar
    ReSAKSS-SA logo - main, white background 015 SA Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System by AKADEMIYA2063 & IWMI 2 AKADEMIYA2063 - December 1 /December 7 -2020 tunisia morocco ALGERIA libya western EGYPT sahara mauritania mali The ExpertiseAKADEMIYA We Need. The Africa We Want. niger Eritrea senegal chad sudan Guinea-Bissau burkina faso guinea benin nigeria ethiopia sierra leone ivory ghana coast central africa republic liberia togo cameroon Equatorial uganda somalia Guinea republic of the congo democratic kenya gabon republic rwanda of the congo burundi tanzania angola malawi zambia Covid-19 Bulletin mozambique zinbabwe namibia botswana madagascar south africa Maize Flour Price trends in rural LOCAL STAPLE FOOD districts and urban districts of MARKET DYNAMICS UNDER COVID Lesotho under COVID-19 The pandemic is likely to be more disruptive to local food markets and thus have more serious Sibusiso Nhlengethwa, Research offi cer Statistics Resakss-SA,IWMI, Greenwell eff ects on the poorest and most vulnerable Matchaya, ReSAKSS-SA Coordinator, IWMI; ReSAKSS-SA, IWMI; Jacob Greffi ths, Research groups and communities than any of the crises in recent years. This is because the poor and offi cer Agricultural Economics, ReSAKSS-SA, IWMI; and Bhekiwe Fakudze, Research vulnerable are aff ected by changes in local Offi cer Agricultural Economics, ReSAKSS-SA, IWMI; Corresponding Author’s email: food staple prices signifi cantly more than other [email protected] population groups, not only because of more limited purchasing power but also because of This bulletin focuses on the relationship between maize fl our price diff erences in consumption baskets. Moreover, trends and the actions in response to COVID-19 Pandemic in Lesotho.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Future Crop Suitability in LESOTHO Research Highlights – Climate Change and Future Crop Suitability in Lesotho
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Climate Change and Future Crop Suitability in LESOTHO Research Highlights – Climate Change and Future Crop Suitability in Lesotho Funded by ‘Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture Programme’ (ASAP) Phase 2. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) Produced by the University of Cape Town Undertaken in support of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) by: African Climate & Development Initiative (www.acdi.uct.ac.za) Climate System Analysis Group (www.csag.uct.ac.za) Environmental Policy Research Unit (www.epru.uct.ac.za) Recommended citation: Hunter. R., Crespo. O., Coldrey, K, Cronin, K, New, M. 2020. Research Highlights – Climate Change and Future Crop Suitability in Lesotho. University of Cape Town, South Africa, undertaken in support of Adaptation for Smallholder Agriculture Programme’ (ASAP) Phase 2. International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), Rome. The content and presentation of material in this report is the sole responsibility of the Authors and does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Fund for Agricultural Development of the United Nations. The project team gratefully acknowledges the support of IFAD towards this research and in particular the IFAD country office and project staff. The project team thanks the various stakeholders and contributors who have shared their knowledge and time during this study. CONTENTS Background and context . 1 Summary results . 2 Method and Approach . 3 Impacts........................................................................................3 Figure 1. Demonstration example of the distribution of crop suitability index. generated using EcoCrop ........4 Adaptive Capacity ...............................................................................5 Table 1. Ranked Adaptive Capacity (AC) indicator scores for all regions of Lesotho ..........................5 Climate projections . 6 Projected changes to Temperature in Lesotho by 2050 .
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study of Gravity-Fed Mountain Spring Tap System in Ha Leronti, Lesotho, Africa
    Michigan Technological University Digital Commons @ Michigan Tech Dissertations, Master's Theses and Master's Reports 2021 CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY-FED MOUNTAIN SPRING TAP SYSTEM IN HA LERONTI, LESOTHO, AFRICA Sarah Peterson Michigan Technological University, [email protected] Copyright 2021 Sarah Peterson Recommended Citation Peterson, Sarah, "CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY-FED MOUNTAIN SPRING TAP SYSTEM IN HA LERONTI, LESOTHO, AFRICA", Open Access Master's Report, Michigan Technological University, 2021. https://doi.org/10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/1217 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/etdr Part of the Civil Engineering Commons, Environmental Engineering Commons, and the Hydraulic Engineering Commons CASE STUDY OF GRAVITY-FED MOUNTAIN SPRING TAP SYSTEM IN HA LERONTI, LESOTHO, AFRICA By Sarah Peterson A REPORT Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Civil Engineering MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY 2021 © 2021 Sarah Peterson This report has been approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Civil Engineering. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Report Advisor: Dr. Brian Barkdoll Committee Member: Dr. Kari Henquinet Committee Member: Dr. David Watkins Department Chair: Dr. Audra Morse Table of Contents Table of Figures ...................................................................................................................2 Table of Tables ....................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Leribe District Local Governance & Non-State Actors Support Programme - LGNSP & Non-State Actors Support Programme Local Governance
    INFORMATION HANDBOOK Leribe District Local Governance & Non-state actors Support Programme - LGNSP & Non-state actors Support Programme Local Governance Report 1 2009 Edited by: Miguel Fernández Trillo-Figueroa Contributions by: Moipone Letsie, Mpopo Tsoele, Matseliso Mapetla Series editor: François Dronnet, Matseliso Ntsoelikane Photos by: Miguel Fernández Trillo-Figueroa INFORMATION HANDBOOK Leribe District Report 1 2009 This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of its author(s) and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Union, the views of the Local Governance and Non-state actors Support Programme (LGNSP) or any of the Lesotho institutions participating in this programme. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for use which might be made of the following information. Published by LGNSP in Maseru (Lesotho), 2009 ISBN 978-92-79-12038-1 © European Communities, 2009 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Copies of this publication can be obtained by writing to: LGNSP Programme Management Unit, Private Bag A478, Maseru 100, Kingdom of Lesotho or to [email protected]. When ordering, please quote ISBN number. This publication can also be downloaded from http://www. lgnsp.co.ls. For further information on the European Union: http://ec.europa.eu/world http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid http://www.dellso.ec.europa.eu/ Designed by: The Media Chilli Illustrations by: Santiago Fernández Trillo-Figueroa Photos by: Miguel Fernández Trillo-Figueroa Produced and printed by: Saysouk Creation graphique s.c.s.
    [Show full text]