IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY V. US
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2018-1215 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:14-cv-00285-CRK, Judge Claire R. Kelly. ______________________ Decided: April 9, 2019 ______________________ FRANCES PIERSON HADFIELD, Crowell & Moring, LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also repre- sented by DANIEL CANNISTRA, Washington, DC. MATTHEW JAMES GLOVER, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Jus- tice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by JEANNE DAVIDSON, JOSEPH H. HUNT; AMY RUBIN, GUY EDDON, New York, NY; MICHAEL W. HEYDRICH, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security, New York, NY. ______________________ 2 IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES Before LOURIE, MAYER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges. LOURIE, Circuit Judge. The United States appeals from the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade (“the Trade Court”) granting Irwin Industrial Tool Company’s (“Irwin”) motion for summary judgment that its imported hand tools are properly classified as pliers, Irwin Indus. Tool Co. v. United States, 269 F. Supp. 3d 1294 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017) (“Irwin II”), and interpreting subheading 8204.12.00 and 8203.20.6030 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), Irwin Indus. Tool Co. v. United States, 222 F. Supp. 3d 1210 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2017) (“Irwin I”). Because the imported articles are properly classified as pliers under 8203.20.6030, we affirm.
[Show full text]