Hurricane David Striking the Georgia Coast

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Hurricane David Striking the Georgia Coast

PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE CHARLESTON SC 1023 PM EDT THU SEP 4 2014 ...35TH ANNIVERSARY OF HURRICANE DAVID STRIKING THE GEORGIA COAST... HURRICANE DAVID MADE LANDFALL NEAR BLACK BEARD ISLAND AS A CATEGORY 2 HURRICANE DURING THE AFTERNOON OF SEPTEMBER 4 1979 AFTER MAKING A VERY BRIEF LANDFALL NEAR WEST PALM BEACH...FLORIDA THE DAY BEFORE. THE EYE CROSSED THE SAVANNAH METRO AREA AROUND 5 PM EST BEFORE MOVING INTO SOUTH CAROLINA BRINGING HIGH WINDS...EXCESSIVE RAINS...TORNADOES...VERY HIGH TIDES AND DANGEROUS SURF. DAVID WAS A MAJOR CATEGORY 5 HURRICANE WITH WINDS PEAKING AROUND 175 MPH AND A MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE OF 924 MB /27.29 IN/ AS IT TRACKED ACROSS PORTIONS OF THE EASTERN AND CENTRAL CARIBBEAN SEA...STRIKING THE SMALL ISLAND OF DOMINICA AND HISPANIOLA THE HARDEST WITH SUSTAINED WINDS OF 100-125 MPH. HURRICANE DAVID GRADUALLY WEAKENED TO A TROPICAL STORM AS IT MOVED ACROSS THE CAROLINAS AND BECAME A STRONG EXTRATROPICAL CYCLONE OVER THE NORTHEAST STATES. WINDS AT MT. WASHINGTON...NEW HAMPSHIRE GUSTED AS HIGH AS 174 MPH. DAVID WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR OVER 2000 DEATHS AND OVER 1.54 BILLION DOLLARS /1979 USD/ IN DAMAGE. DAVID WAS THE LAST HURRICANE TO MAKE A DIRECT HIT TO SAVANNAH. HIGH WINDS DOWNED NUMEROUS TREES AND POWERLINES WITH POWER OUTAGES LASTING FOR SEVERAL WEEKS. --- METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATIONS FOR HURRICANE DAVID --- HIGHEST MINIMUM STATION SUSTAINED WIND PEAK GUST RAINFALL PRESSURE SAVANNAH AIRPORT NE 58 MPH 68 MPH 6.86 IN 28.65 IN ST SIMMONS ISLAND NE 40 MPH 45 MPH CHARLESTON AIRPORT S 43 MPH 56 MPH 6.76 IN 29.36 IN HILTON HEAD 70 MPH COLUMBIA AIRPORT NE 28 MPH 43 MPH 5.26 IN 29.26 IN $$ .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Hurricane & Tropical Storm
5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
[Show full text]
Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms
FLORIDA HURRICANES AND TROPICAL STORMS 1871-1995: An Historical Survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams '+wcCopy~~ I~BN 0-912747-08-0 Florida SeaGrant College is supported by award of the Office of Sea Grant, NationalOceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce,grant number NA 36RG-0070, under provisions of the NationalSea Grant College and Programs Act of 1966. This information is published by the Sea Grant Extension Program which functionsas a coinponentof the Florida Cooperative Extension Service, John T. Woeste, Dean, in conducting Cooperative Extensionwork in Agriculture, Home Economics, and Marine Sciences,State of Florida, U.S. Departmentof Agriculture, U.S. Departmentof Commerce, and Boards of County Commissioners, cooperating.Printed and distributed in furtherance af the Actsof Congressof May 8 andJune 14, 1914.The Florida Sea Grant Collegeis an Equal Opportunity-AffirmativeAction employer authorizedto provide research, educational information and other servicesonly to individuals and institutions that function without regardto race,color, sex, age,handicap or nationalorigin. Coverphoto: Hank Brandli & Rob Downey LOANCOPY ONLY Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms 1871-1995: An Historical survey Fred Doehring, Iver W. Duedall, and John M. Williams Division of Marine and Environmental Systems, Florida Institute of Technology Melbourne, FL 32901 Technical Paper - 71 June 1994 $5.00 Copies may be obtained from: Florida Sea Grant College Program University of Florida Building 803 P.O. Box 110409 Gainesville, FL 32611-0409 904-392-2801 II Our friend andcolleague, Fred Doehringpictured below, died on January 5, 1993, before this manuscript was completed. Until his death, Fred had spent the last 18 months painstakingly researchingdata for this book.
[Show full text]
Storm Modification Although Experts in the Meteorological Field Aren’T Enthusiastic About These Ideas Due to the Inconclusive Results from Project Stormfury
Solving Today’s Hurricane Problem Through Modification Submitted by: Greg Machos Webmaster/Owner www.hurricaneville.com Submitted to: Dr. Stephan Nelson Director of Atmospheric Science National Science Foundation Room 775 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, VA 22230 April 27, 2001 Final Proposal for Business and Professional Writing If found, please return to: Mark Waren Department of English Murray Hall, Room 032 College Avenue Campus, Rutgers University i ABSTRACT This proposal is for a research study that will attempt to combine the best elements of both the federal government and private industry projects on hurricane intensification and modification. There will be a difference in the way a hurricane will be attacked. Rather than trying to attack it through seeding its inner core, this proposal will try to use wind shear at the upper levels to destroy the storm’s vertical structure. Past research has shown that work in this area of study has had positive impacts on hurricane forecasting that ultimately saved lives. Furthermore, technology has improved significantly over the last twenty years and with the tremendous strides made in weather forecasting over the past century, now may be a great time to revisit this kind of research again. Coastal communities in the eastern half of the United States as well as many underdeveloped countries in the Caribbean and Central America are more vulnerable than ever to a major hurricane like Hurricane Andrew in 1992 or Hurricane Mitch in 1998. Hurricane Andrew caused approximately $27 billion dollars in damage after making landfall in South Florida while Hurricane Mitch left an estimated 11,000 people dead from heavy rains over a period of several days.
[Show full text]
Assessing Natural and Mechanical Dune Performance in a Post-Hurricane Environment
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Assessing Natural and Mechanical Dune Performance in a Post-Hurricane Environment Jean T. Ellis * and Mayra A. Román-Rivera Department of Geography, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 April 2019; Accepted: 29 April 2019; Published: 2 May 2019 Abstract: The purpose of this study is to document the geomorphic evolution of a mechanical dune over approximately one year following its installation and compare it to the recovery of a natural dune following the impact of Hurricane Matthew (2016). During the study period, the dunes’ integrity was tested by wave and wind events, including king tides, and a second hurricane (Irma, 2017), at the end of the study period. Prior to the impact of the second hurricane, the volumetric increase of the mechanical and natural dune was 32% and 75%, respectively, suggesting that scraping alone is not the optimal protection method. If scraping is employed, we advocate that the dune should be augmented by planting. Ideally, the storm-impacted dune should naturally recover. Post-storm vegetation regrowth was lower around the mechanical dune, which encouraged aeolian transport and dune deﬂation. Hurricane Irma, an extreme forcing event, substantially impacted the dunes. The natural dune was scarped and the mechanical dune was overtopped; the system was essentially left homogeneous following the hurricane. The results from this study question the current practice of sand scraping along the South Carolina coast, which occurs post-storm, emplacement along the former primary dune line, and does not include the planting of vegetation.
[Show full text]
A Classification Scheme for Landfalling Tropical Cyclones
A CLASSIFICATION SCHEME FOR LANDFALLING TROPICAL CYCLONES BASED ON PRECIPITATION VARIABLES DERIVED FROM GIS AND GROUND RADAR ANALYSIS by IAN J. COMSTOCK JASON C. SENKBEIL, COMMITTEE CHAIR DAVID M. BROMMER JOE WEBER P. GRADY DIXON A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in the Department of Geography in the graduate school of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2011 Copyright Ian J. Comstock 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Landfalling tropical cyclones present a multitude of hazards that threaten life and property to coastal and inland communities. These hazards are most commonly categorized by the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Potential Disaster Scale. Currently, there is not a system or scale that categorizes tropical cyclones by precipitation and flooding, which is the primary cause of fatalities and property damage from landfalling tropical cyclones. This research compiles ground based radar data (Nexrad Level-III) in the U.S. and analyzes tropical cyclone precipitation data in a GIS platform. Twenty-six landfalling tropical cyclones from 1995 to 2008 are included in this research where they were classified using Cluster Analysis. Precipitation and storm variables used in classification include: rain shield area, convective precipitation area, rain shield decay, and storm forward speed. Results indicate six distinct groups of tropical cyclones based on these variables. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the faculty members I have been working with over the last year and a half on this project. I was able to present different aspects of this thesis at various conferences and for this I would like to thank Jason Senkbeil for keeping me ambitious and for his patience through the many hours spent deliberating over the enormous amounts of data generated from this research.
[Show full text]
The Effects of Hurricanes on Birds, with Special Reference to Caribbean Islands
Bird Conservation International (1993) 3:319-349 The effects of hurricanes on birds, with special reference to Caribbean islands JAMES W. WILEY and JOSEPH M. WUNDERLE, JR. Summary Cyclonic storms, variously called typhoons, cyclones, or hurricanes (henceforth, hurricanes), are common in many parts of the world, where their frequent occurrence can have both direct and indirect effects on bird populations. Direct effects of hurricanes include mortality from exposure to hurricane winds, rains, and storm surges, and geo- graphic displacement of individuals by storm winds. Indirect effects become apparent in the storm's aftermath and include loss of food supplies or foraging substrates; loss of nests and nest or roost sites; increased vulnerability to predation; microclimate changes; and increased conflict with humans. The short-term response of bird populations to hurricane damage, before changes in plant succession, includes shifts in diet, foraging sites or habitats, and reproductive changes. Bird populations may show long-term responses to changes in plant succession as second-growth vegetation increases in storm- damaged old-growth forests. The greatest stress of a hurricane to most upland terrestrial bird populations occurs after its passage rather than during its impact. The most important effect of a hurricane is the destruction of vegetation, which secondarily affects wildlife in the storm's after- math. The most vulnerable terrestrial wildlife populations have a diet of nectar, fruit, or seeds; nest, roost, or forage on large old trees; require a closed forest canopy; have special microclimate requirements and/or live in a habitat in which vegetation has a slow recovery rate. Small populations with these traits are at greatest risk to hurricane-induced extinction, particularly if they exist in small isolated habitat fragments.
[Show full text]
Evacuation Routes
winds resulted in thousands of downed branches, limbs, and trees across our region leading to months of clean-up. Along with hurricane force winds, torrential rain hit our area. Hunter Army Air Field in Savannah mea- sured 17.48” of rain during the storm. The highest storm surge anywhere in the United States during Hurricane Matthew was at Fort Pulaski. Storm surge levels measured 7.7 feet above normal tide levels. After sliding along the coast of southeast Georgia, Matthew made landfall on October 8 near THIS SEASON’S McClellanville, South Carolina as a Category 1 Hurricane with winds of 86 mph. Hurricane Matthew OUTLOOK was the first hurricane since Hurricane Hazel in 1954 to make landfall in the United States north of Florida WITH JEREMY NELSON during the month of October. A message from the The last storm to make landfall in the greater WJCL 22 StormTracker Savannah area was Hurricane David in 1979. Anyone living in the area knows the impact that storm Chief Meteorologist produced…from downed trees to power outages that in some cases lasted two weeks. Another Atlantic hurricane season is upon us! The memories of Hurricane Matthew are fresh in the The best way to protect yourself, your family, and minds of many as we enter hurricane season. Last property before the next storm threatens is to take year served as a reminder that we are not immune simple steps now. This Hurricane Guide is designed to tropical storms and hurricanes in southeast to assist you as you develop your plan, learn your Georgia and the Lowcountry despite a lull in activity evacuation route, and prepare your disaster kit.
[Show full text]
Sidebar 4.1: Hurricane Irma: Rewriting the Record Books—P
SIDEBAR 4.1: HURRICANE IRMA: REWRITING THE RECORD BOOKS—P. J. KLOTZBACH Hurricane Irma generated the highest ACE values (Bell which provides six-hourly estimates of historical Atlantic et al. 2000) of any Atlantic hurricane during the extremely tropical cyclone wind speeds, pressures, and locations active 2017 season. Irma developed from a tropical wave since 1851 (Landsea and Franklin 2013). in the eastern Atlantic, reaching tropical storm status on Irma began to set records as it approached the north- %YKYWX3ZIVXLIRI\XWIZIVEPHE]W-VQEMRXIRWM½IH IVR0II[EVH-WPERHW-XMRXIRWM½IHMRXSEOX QWď) into a major hurricane in an environment of anomalously category 5 hurricane late on 5 September, making it the weak vertical wind shear and anomalously high SSTs. strongest Atlantic hurricane outside of the Gulf of Mexico On 5 September, Irma reached category 5 intensity and Caribbean on record. Irma also shattered the old as it bore down on the northern Leeward Islands. Over record for strongest hurricane to impact the northern the next several days, Irma devastated many islands in Leeward Islands (defined as 15°–19°N, 65°–60°W), the eastern and central Caribbean, then went on to make breaking the old record of 140 kt (72 m sď) set by the landfall in Cuba before making two landfalls in Florida. It Lake Okeechobee Hurricane of 1928 and Hurricane David ½REPP][IEOIRIHXSEXVSTMGEPHITVIWWMSRIEVP]SR7IT- (1979). Irma brought devastation to Barbuda (Fig. SB4.1), tember near the Georgia/Alabama border. In this sidebar, Anguilla, and portions of the U.S. and British Virgin Islands several of Hurricane Irma’s most notable meteorological and then passed north of Puerto Rico.
[Show full text]
Marine Damage Report & Dive Sector Needs Assessment Commonwealth of Dominica, Post Hurricane Maria Funded By
Marine Damage Report & Dive Sector Needs Assessment Commonwealth of Dominica, Post Hurricane Maria Funded by OAS Consultant Arun Madisetti Independent Marine Biologist Needs Assessment for Commonwealth of Dominica Following Hurricane Maria Introduction The Commonwealth of Dominica is known for experiencing extreme weather conditions and earthquakes. The island lies within the hurricane belt and has been impacted by many hurricanes and tropical storms. The most damaging storms in recent years include Hurricane David in 1979, Hurricane Hugo in 1989, Hurricane Marilyn in 1995, Hurricane Lenny in 1999, and Tropical Storm Erika in 2015.2 On August 27, 2015, Tropical Storm Erika hit Dominica. Rainfall of approximately 38 centimeters was recorded in southern Dominica, but because of the peaked topography of the island, it is likely that even higher levels of rainfall occurred in the interior of Dominica due to Tropical Storm Erika. The large amount of rainfall over such a short period caused landslides and flash-floods which resulted in carnage throughout much of the country—the most severe of which was reported on the western and south-eastern coasts. Tragically, 31 people died as a result of the storm and many more were displaced or experienced property loss or damage. The total estimated damage from T.S. Erika in Dominica alone was $483 million USD. The extensive impact of Tropical Storm Erika on Dominica emphasized the significance of hazard preparedness and climate change risk management, particularly at the government level.2 Most recently, Hurricane Maria (Figure 1) struck Dominica the evening of September 18, 2017 and bisected the island from southeast to northwest (Figure 2) during a period of about 8 hours with sustained wind speeds of 160 miles per hour (mph) and wind gusts well in excess of 250 mph (Figure 3).
[Show full text]
Landslides Triggered by Hurricane Hugo in Eastern Puerto Rico, September 1989
Caribbean Journal of Science, Vol. 28, No. 3-4, 113.125, 1992 Copyright 1992 College of Arts and Science University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Landslides Triggered by Hurricane Hugo in Eastern Puerto Rico, September 1989 M ATTHEW C. LARSEN AND A NGEL J. TORRES S ANCHEZ U.S. Geological Survey, P.O. Box 364424, San ]uan, Puerto Rico, 00936-4424 ABSTRACT . – On the morning of September 18, 1989, a category-four hurricane struck eastern Puerto Rico with a sustained wind speed in excess of 46 m/sec. The 24-h rainfall accumulation from the hurricane ranged from 100 to 339 mm. Average rainfall intensities ranging from 34 to 39 mm/h were calculated for 4 and 6 h periods, respectively, at a rain gage equipped with satellite telemetry, and at an observer station. The hurricane rainfall triggered more than 400 landslides in the steeply sloping, highly dissected mountains of eastern Puerto Rico. Of these landslides, 285 were mapped from aerial photography which covered 6474 ha. Many of the mapped landslides were on northeast- and northwest-facing slopes at the eastern terminus of the mountains, nearest the hurricane path. The surface area of individual landslides ranged from 18 m2 to 4500 m2, with a median size of 148 m2. The 285 landslides disturbed 0.11% of the land surface in the area covered by aerial photographs. An approximate denudation rate of 164 mm/1000 yr was calculated from the volume of material eroded by landsliding and the 10-yr rainfall recurrence interval. RESUMEN. — En la manana del 18 de septiembre de 1989, un huracan de categoria cuatro paso por el sector este de Puerto Rico con vientos sostenidos de mas de 46 metros por segundo.
[Show full text]
Florida Hurricanes and Tropical Storms, 1871-1993: an Historical Survey, the Only Books Or Reports Exclu- Sively on Florida Hurricanes Were R.W
3. 2b -.I 3 Contents List of Tables, Figures, and Plates, ix Foreword, xi Preface, xiii Chapter 1. Introduction, 1 Chapter 2. Historical Discussion of Florida Hurricanes, 5 1871-1900, 6 1901-1930, 9 1931-1960, 16 1961-1990, 24 Chapter 3. Four Years and Billions of Dollars Later, 36 1991, 36 1992, 37 1993, 42 1994, 43 Chapter 4. Allison to Roxanne, 47 1995, 47 Chapter 5. Hurricane Season of 1996, 54 Appendix 1. Hurricane Preparedness, 56 Appendix 2. Glossary, 61 References, 63 Tables and Figures, 67 Plates, 129 Index of Named Hurricanes, 143 Subject Index, 144 About the Authors, 147 Tables, Figures, and Plates Tables, 67 1. Saffir/Simpson Scale, 67 2. Hurricane Classification Prior to 1972, 68 3. Number of Hurricanes, Tropical Storms, and Combined Total Storms by 10-Year Increments, 69 4. Florida Hurricanes, 1871-1996, 70 Figures, 84 l A-I. Great Miami Hurricane 2A-B. Great Lake Okeechobee Hurricane 3A-C.Great Labor Day Hurricane 4A-C. Hurricane Donna 5. Hurricane Cleo 6A-B. Hurricane Betsy 7A-C. Hurricane David 8. Hurricane Elena 9A-C. Hurricane Juan IOA-B. Hurricane Kate 1 l A-J. Hurricane Andrew 12A-C. Hurricane Albert0 13. Hurricane Beryl 14A-D. Hurricane Gordon 15A-C. Hurricane Allison 16A-F. Hurricane Erin 17A-B. Hurricane Jerry 18A-G. Hurricane Opal I9A. 1995 Hurricane Season 19B. Five 1995 Storms 20. Hurricane Josephine , Plates, X29 1. 1871-1880 2. 1881-1890 Foreword 3. 1891-1900 4. 1901-1910 5. 1911-1920 6. 1921-1930 7. 1931-1940 These days, nothing can escape the watchful, high-tech eyes of the National 8.
[Show full text]
Hurricane Hugo Fact Sheet
HUGO25 FACT SHEET Hurricane Hugo made landfall north of Charleston Harbor on the South Carolina coast the night of Sept. 21, 1989, affecting an estimated 1.8 million people. Presidential declarations were issued for 24 counties seeking federal disaster assistance. Hugo arrived just before midnight with estimated maximum sustained wind of 138 miles per hour. The eye of the Category 4 hurricane was 30 nautical miles wide, with storm surge flooding 15-20 feet above normal. It cut a path through the state just north of Charleston and continued inland to Lake Moultrie and west of Sumter, through Chester and York counties and by 5 a.m. was in the area of Charlotte, N.C. The primary coastal damage was caused by storm surge flooding, surge- related erosion, wave action and high winds with rainfall. Inland counties also received unexpected high winds and torrential rains. Falling trees and high winds broke power lines, crushed cars, and blocked roads while also breaking windows, peeling roofs, destroying mobile homes and causing widespread damages to homes and buildings. Many areas lost utilities for up to two weeks. Despite conditions, only two tornadoes were confirmed: a small tornado apparently developed in western Sumter County and another one near Kershaw in Lancaster County. Counties that were declared disasters were Berkeley, Calhoun, Charleston, Cherokee, Chester, Chesterfield, Clarendon, Colleton, Darlington, Dorchester, Fairfield, Florence, Georgetown, Horry, Kershaw, Lancaster, Lee, Marion, Marlboro, Orangeburg, Richland, Sumter, Williamsburg, and York. th Hurricane Hugo was the most severe hurricane to strike South Carolina the 20 century. Hurricane Hazel in October 1954 brought winds of 106 miles an hour and tides of up to 16.9 feet.
[Show full text]