Rev a de la Fac l ad de Med c a
Journal of the Faculty of Medicine Rev. Fac. Med. 2020Año 72, Vol. 68, No. 1 Faculty of Medicine Editorial Committee
Franklin Escobar Córdoba. MD.MPF.PhD. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Colombia.
Javier Eslava Schmalbach. MD.MSc.PhD. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Colombia. Lisieux Elaine de Borba Telles MD. MPF. PhD. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Brazil.
Adelaida Restrepo PhD. Arizona State University. USA. Eduardo De La Peña de Torres PhD. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. España. Fernando Sánchez-Santed MD. Universidad de Almería. España. Gustavo C. Román MD. University of Texas at San Antonio. USA. Jorge E. Tolosa MD.MSCE. Oregon Health & Science University. USA. Jorge Óscar Folino MD. MPF. PhD. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Argentina. Julio A. Chalela MD. Medical University of South Carolina. USA. Sergio Javier Villaseñor Bayardo MD. PhD. Universidad de Guadalajara. México.
Cecilia Algarin MD., Universidad de Chile. Lilia María Sánchez MD., Université de Montréal. Claudia Rosario Portilla Ramírez PhD.(c)., Universidad de Barcelona. Marco Tulio de Mello MD. PhD., Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo. Dalva Poyares MD. PhD., Universidade Federal de São Paulo. Marcos German Mora González, PhD., Universidad de Chile Eduardo José Pedrero-Pérez, MSc. PhD., Instituto de Adicciones, Madrid Salud. María Angélica Martinez-Tagle MSc. PhD., Universidad de Chile. Emilia Chirveches-Pérez, PhD., Consorci Hospitalari de Vic María Dolores Gil Llario, PhD., Universitat de València Fernando Jaén Águila, MD, MSc., Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada. María Isabel Izquierdo Macián, MD., Universidad de Valencia. Guillermo Felipe López Sánchez, MSc, PhD., Universidad de Murcia. Martine Bonnaure-Mallet PhD., Université de Rennes. Iván Rodríguez Núñez, MSc, PhD., Universidad San Sebastián Miguel A. López Pérez PhD. Post Doc., University of Cambridge. Jay P. Singh, PhD., University of Oxford Patricio Peirano MD. PhD., Universidad de Chile. Juan Manuel Céspedes, MD., Universidad de Chile, Santiago de Chile. Rubén Nogueiras Pozo PhD. Post Doc., University of Cincinnati. Judith Jiménez Díaz, MSC, PhD., Universidad de Costa Rica. Sergio Alberto Ramírez García PhD. Post Doc., Universidad de la Sierra Sur Jorge Rey de Castro MD. MSc., Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Yulia Solovieva, PhD., Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
Alfonso Javier Morales, MD, MSc, PhD (c)., Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira. Jorge Andrés Rubio Romero MD. MSc., Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Carlos Gómez Restrepo, MD, MSc, PhD (c)., Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Jorge Eduardo Caminos Pinzón MSc. PhD., Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Carlos Uribe Tobón PhD., Universidad de los Andes. Luis Alfonso Díaz-Martínez, MD MSc., Universidad Industrial de Santander Claudia Patricia Henao Lema, Ft, MSc, PhD., Universidad Autónoma de Manizales Orlando Acosta Losada MSc. PhD., Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Edgar Prieto Suárez Ing. MD. MSc., Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Pío Iván Gómez Sánchez MD. MSc., Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Francisco Javier Lopera Restrepo, MD., Universidad de Antioquia Ricardo Sánchez Pedraza MD. MSc., Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Iván Darío Sierra Ariza MD. MSc. PhD., Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Wilmer Ernesto Villamil Gómez, MD, MSc, PhD., Universidad de Sucre
ISSN 0120-0011 e-ISSN: 2357-3848 Editorial Coordinator Cristhian Leonardo López León Universidad Nacional de Colombia Copy Editing Yuri Paola Sarmiento Alonso Universidad Nacional de Colombia Editorial Assistant Maria José Zambrano Moreno Universidad Nacional de Colombia Cover illustration Jeison Gustavo Malagón/ Universidad Nacional de Colombia Design and diagramming Óscar Gómez Franco Universidad Nacional de Colombia Translation Lina Johana Montoya Polo Universidad Nacional de Colombia The concepts expressed hereinafter are the sole responsibility of their authors and do not necessarily represent the criteria of the Editors of the Faculty of Medicine of Universidad Nacional de Colombia. The Journal of the Faculty of Medicine is an official body of the Faculty of Medicine of Universidad Nacional de Colombia and is published quarterly. License granted by the Ministry of Government through Resolution no. 1749 of August 30, 1993. All correspondence should be sent to: Franklin Escobar Córdoba, office 225, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá Campus •Telephone numbers: 3165145/3165000 Ext. 15161 • Bogotá, D.C., Colombia • email: [email protected] .
The Journal of the Faculty of Medicine is an official publication of the Faculty of Medicine of Universidad Nacional de Colombia and aims at disseminating knowledge on different scientific, social and artistic fields related to professionals and students of the area of health, practice and teaching. It is particularly directed to professionals and students of the area of health, social and human sciences associated with the professional field. The Journal is included in: Scopus, Web of Knowledge, SciELO (https://goo.gl/OSX6eJ), DOAJ, Ulrich, Publindex, Latindex, Imbiomed, Lilacs, Old Medline, Portal de Revistas UN (electronic publication: https://goo.gl/HBGgGJ), SIIC Data Bases, REDIB. Reproduction and printed copies: photocopies of papers and texts are authorized for academic purposes or internal use of the institutions, with citation of the source. For printed copies, please address your request at our office. Contents
Editorial
The COVID-19 pandemic 7 José Ricardo Navarro Vargas https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.86482
Original research
Differences in pain measurement between nurses and physicians in a teaching hospital 9 Jairo Ricardo Moyano-Acevedo, Bilena Margarita Molina-Arteta, Edna Matute-Gonzales, Laura Camargo-Sánchez http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.71744
Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in 14 Europe and Canada Revisión sistemática y análisis comparativo de las herramientas de tamizaje nutricional en pediatría validadas en Europa y Canadá Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas, Olga Lucia Pinzón-Espitia http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73180
Use of non-pharmacological interventions during urinary catheter insertion for reducing 24 urinary tract infections in non-immunocompromised adults. A systematic review Intervenciones no farmacológicas durante la inserción de un catéter urinario permanente para reducir las infecciones en adultos inmunocompetentes. Revisión sistemática Ximena Sáenz-Montoya, Carlos Fernando Grillo-Ardila, Jairo Amaya-Guio, Jessica Muñoz-Vesga http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.74383
Characterization of prenatal exposure variables in a group of children aged 0-5 years with 34 congenital heart defect treated in Cali, Colombia. The importance of folic acid Caracterización de la exposición prenatal de un grupo de niños de 0 a 5 años con cardiopatía congénita atendidos en Cali, Colombia. La importancia del ácido fólico Julián Ramírez-Cheyne http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.69885
Cumulative incidence of lethal congenital anomalies in Peru 44 Incidencia acumulada de anomalías fetales incompatibles con la vida en Perú Alvaro Taype-Rondan, Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka, Enrique Guevara-Ríos, Susana Chávez-Alvarado http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.71589 Cardiovascular disease risk markers in children under 10 years of age and their relationship 51 with serum concentrations of IGF-1, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3 Marcadores de riesgo cardiovascular en niños menores de 10 años y su relación con niveles séricos de IGF-1, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2 e IGFBP-3 Sorany Vera, Tatiana Figueroa, Luz Helena Aranzalez, Ismena Mockus http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.69979
Knowledge about healthcare-associated infections in medical, bioanalysis and nursing 59 students from a Venezuelan university Conocimiento sobre infecciones asociadas a la atención de la salud en estudiantes de Medicina, Licenciatura en Bioanálisis y Licenciatura en Enfermería de una universidad venezolana Armando Guevara, Oscar González, Pedro Salazar, Rosa Tedesco-Maiullari, Cheila Gascón http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.71181
Anatomical features of bile ducts in a sample of Colombian corpses 66 Características anatómicas de las vías biliares en una muestra de cadáveres de población colombiana Yobany Quijano http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.70880
Use of medical eponyms and obsolete anatomical terms during the 13th Colombian Congress 73 of Morphology 2017 Uso de epónimos médicos y términos anatómicos obsoletos durante el XIII Congreso Colombiano de Morfología de 2017 Jorge Eduardo Duque-Parra, John Barco-Ríos, Genaro Morales-Parra http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.72843
Quality of clinical practice guidelines approved in Peru between 2015 and 2017 77 Calidad de las guías de práctica clínica aprobadas en Perú entre 2015 y 2017 Oscar Steven Huapaya-Huertas, Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka, Carlos Ronald Viru-Bazan, Karina Alicia Gil-Loayza, Ingrid Miluska Cruzado-Zafra, Álvaro Taype-Rondan http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.70515
Gait parameters in a sample of healthy Colombian adults aged between 18 and 25 years: a 84 cross-sectional study Parámetros de la marcha en una muestra de adultos sanos colombianos entre 18 y 25 años, un estudio transversal José Ricardo Duque-Ramírez, José David Vélez-Uribe, Nicolás Eugenio Gómez-Suárez, Rubén Darío Manrique-Hernández http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.71690
Analysis of physical fitness according to sex, age, body mass index and level of physical 92 activity in Spanish elementary school students Análisis de la condición física según sexo, edad, índice de masa corporal y nivel de actividad física en estudiantes de primaria en España Andrés Rosa-Guillamón, Pedro José Carrillo-López, Eliseo García-Cantó http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.69977
Body mass index and cardiorespiratory fitness among public school teachers from 100 Barranquilla, Colombia Índice de masa corporal y capacidad cardiorrespiratoria en docentes de colegios públicos de Barranquilla, Colombia José Armando Vidarte-Claros, Shirley Fontalvo-Navarro, Alix Yaneth Herazo-Beltrán, Consuelo Vélez-Álvarez http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.70177 Discriminatory accuracy of serological tests for detecting Trypanosoma cruzi using the ROC 107 curve and the standard methodology Precisión discriminatoria de pruebas serológicas para Trypanosoma cruzi aplicando metodología estándar y de curva COR Marvin Querales, Ana Rita De Lima, Harú Martínez-de Cordero, Domenica Carolina Cannova, María Isabel Simons, Luis Pérez-Ybarra http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.71092
Reflection paper
Big data, pharmacoepidemiology and pharmacovigilance 117 Big data, farmacoepidemiología y farmacovigilancia Jorge Andrés Sánchez-Duque, Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza, Paula Andrea Moreno-Gutiérrez, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73456
Review article
Evidence of conflicts of interest in Medicine 121 Evidencia sobre conflictos de intereses en medicina Mario Arturo González-Mariño http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73475
Oral tolerance induction in organ and tissue transplantation. Literature review 130 Inducción de tolerancia por vía oral en trasplante de órganos y tejidos. Revisión de la Literatura Juan Felipe Rivillas-Reyes, Erwin Felipe Hernández-Duran, Jessica Liliana Morales-Manrique, María Paula Rivillas, Harvey Lozano-Marquez, Eyner Lozano-Marquez http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.72108
Case report
Bulluos Henoch-Schönlein Purpura in pediatrics. Case report 143 Púrpura Henoch-Schönlein bullosa en pediatría. Reporte de caso Andrés Iván Quimbayo-Romero, Kevin Joseph Camargo-Rodríguez, Carlos Javier Lozano-Triana, Guillermo Landínez-Millán http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.71380
Precocious puberty due to congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Case report 148 Pubertad precoz por hiperplasia adrenal congénita. Reporte de caso María Fernanda Dallos-Lara, Víctor Clemente Mendoza-Rojas http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.72674
Letter to the editor
English language and Peruvian medical programs 153 El inglés en la medicina académica peruana José Vásquez-Villalobos, Ricardo Vergara-Polo, Marioli Farro-Maldonado, Glenda Gutiérrez-Pérez, Adriana Herrera-Guzmán, Fernando Miguel Runzer-Colmenares http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.74937 Intra-individual somatic variation of the rs669 polymorphism in the A2M gene in patients 155 with colorectal cancer Variación somática intraindividual del polimorfismo rs669 del gen A2M en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal Helen Haydee Fernanda Ramírez-Plascencia, Melva Gutiérrez-Angulo, Alexis Sayuri Suárez-Villanueva, Jorge Peregrina-Sandoval, María de la Luz Ayala-Madrigal http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.79864 7 Rev. Fac. Med. 2020 Vol. 68 No. 1: 7-8
EDITORIAL DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.86482
Rev a de la Fac l ad de Med c a The COVID-19 pandemic
Introducción
I open this note with some alarming figures: as of May isolated. This means that the country would only have 26, 2020, over 5 635 000 people have become infected about 750 ICU beds to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic. and nearly 350 000 have died from the new coronavirus On January 11, when the first death from pneumonia (COVID-19) worldwide.1 Meanwhile, in Colombia, there secondary to the new coronavirus was reported in Wu- are already 21 981 people infected and 750 deaths from han, a highly technological and populous city located in this disease, that is, a 3.4% mortality rate.2 central China, this disease seemed a distant problem. COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by a new Furthermore, when quarantine was declared in that city coronavirus strain. Most people infected with COVID-19 12 days after the first death, many considered it an ar- will develop a mild to moderate respiratory illness and bitrary measure that would have severe economic and recover without the need for hospital care. However, the social repercussions. disease can significantly affect older people and those At this time, when the pandemic continues to spread with underlying diseases such as diabetes, chronic re- at an alarming rate, the world must learn from the ex- spiratory diseases, cancer, obesity, and cardiovascular perience of countries such as China and Japan. These disease,3 and it could even lead to death, which undoubt- countries, in addition to abiding by the decisions tak- edly places a burden on health systems, particularly on en by their governments (in the first case because of intensive care units (ICUs). their authoritarian regime and in the second case be- Currently, no health system in the world has suffi- cause of their cultural tradition), faithfully adopted the cient capacity to treat these patients in their ICUs and following health measures: intermediate care units nor the necessary staff (doc- Containment phase: frequent hand washing, physical tors, nurses, and respiratory therapists) and equipment distance of at least 1.5 meters, limitation of crowding in (ventilators and monitors). In other words, no country is public places (no more than 10 people), and implemen- prepared to face a pandemic of these dimensions, basi- tation of isolation protocols that included the closure cally because the measures to be taken require having of schools, colleges, universities, bars, entertainment massive economic resources available, as well as the sites, among others. cooperation of a supportive and responsible communi- Mitigation phase: when the virus began to circulate in ty. Both requirements, together, will make it possible the population (not airborne but through contact routes), to achieve complete isolation of the population, which the decision was more drastic: people’s mobility was is the only effective action known to date to reduce the completely limited and maximum willingness to com- spread of the virus. However, achieving this also requires ply with the measures was requested. that governments, on the one hand, implement equi- Also, the experience of South Korea should be con- ty measures that meet the basic needs of a large part sidered. It is a powerhouse that exports and markets of the population and, on the other, inject considerable —among other products— ventilators, monitors, and resources into health systems so that healthcare insti- other medical supplies, which the entire world is now tutions and staff can serve as many people as possible requiring. There, authorities made a wise decision and under the best biosecurity conditions. initiated fast and creative actions against this virus According to the Asociación Colombiana de Socie- because an uncontrolled pandemic can overflow and dades Científicas (Colombian Association of Scientific collapse any health system; therefore, this situation Societies),4 there are approximately 12 000 ICU beds must be dealt with promptly. Thus, the South Korean in Colombia. Even so, only 5 300 have ventilators, 80% authorities, knowing that RNA viruses, like the coro- of them are usually occupied, and only 10-15% are fully navirus, reproduce mainly in the respiratory tract and Rev. Fac. Med. 2020 Vol. 68 No. 1: 7-8 8 have a high rate of transmission and mutation, decided purpose (e.g., hotels, stadiums, etc.). In turn, patients to apply a bali-bali (quick-quick) strategy: more than in critical condition or at high risk should be hospitalized. 20 000 daily rapid tests were performed (in less than 5) Inspire and mobilize the public. In this all-out battle, 5 minutes) for free in the largest cities of the country. everyone has a role to play, and virtually everyone wants These tests were randomly performed to pedestrians, to play it. Everyone, without exception, must commit since drivers, students, employees, among others, which we are all responsible for each other. We can all help re- allowed identifying early a large number of people in- duce the risk of exposure and help friends and neighbors fected and put them in quarantine for 15 days, thus in these times of crisis. controlling the disease. By May 26, 2020, that country 6) Learn while doing through real-time, fundamental had reported 10 806 confirmed cases, 11 225 recov- research. Clinicians and researchers require better pre- ered patients, and 269 deaths, data that undoubtedly dictors to determine which pre-existing conditions make confirm an effective control of the pandemic.5 patients with COVID-19 more likely to deteriorate or who In the April editorial of the New England Journal of may die from the disease. Decisions on public health ac- Medicine, Dr. Harvey Fineberg,6 concerned about the tions and the restart of the economy must be guided by unfortunate decisions of President Donald Trump in view science because if we know for sure how many people of the imminent mortality of a large number of Ameri- have been infected and if they are now immune, we can cans from COVID-19, proposed six goals that the U.S. determine whether it is safe for them to return to their presidency should develop to deal with this pandem- jobs. If this science-driven approach is implemented, ic successfully. These goals can be replicated in other all types of businesses, including airlines and restau- countries according to their local characteristics: rants, can reopen, which in turn will allow us to resume 1) Establish unified command. The President should our normal activities gradually. appoint a commander that reports directly to him. This In conclusion, not having lived through or contem- person should have the same powers to mobilize the plated the ravages of a health emergency such as the resources necessary to overcome this pandemic. More- current pandemic is no reason to enter into despair and over, each governor should designate one commander fear. Instead, it should strengthen and motivate us all per state with the same authority because the variation to work together and bring out the best of humanity to of the pandemic phases in different regions will make overcome this situation. it possible to focus actions in specific places and times target and redirect limited supplies to where they are Referencias most needed, and learn from experience as the situa- tion progresses. 1. Worldometer. Coronavirus Cases. Dadax Limited; 2020 [ci- 2) Make millions of diagnostic tests available. If millions ted 2020 May 26]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2xUOyks. of these tests are performed within two weeks, it will 2. Colombia. Instituto Nacional de Salud. Coronavirus (CO- be possible to identify and trace the infected people VID-2019) en Colombia. Bogotá D.C.: INS; 2020 [cited 2020 and isolate them preventively; this was the key to the May 26]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3b1MMMx. good results obtained in South Korea. Without diagnos- 3. World Health Organization (WHO). Coronavirus. Geneva: WHO; tic tests, the extent of the outbreak cannot be traced, 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 14]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2RFAr90. so research laboratories and test collection and analy- 4. Asociación Colombiana de Sociedades Científicas (ACSC). sis centers need to be mobilized across the country to Recomendaciones por parte de ACSC para enfrentar la si- better screen the population. tuación actual de la pandemia del coronavirus (SARS-CoV2) 3) Supply health workers with sufficient personal pro- COVID-19 en Colombia. Bogotá D.C.: ACSC; 2020 [cited 2020 tective equipment and provide hospitals with the necessary Apr 14]. Available from: https://bit.ly/3ena1mu. equipment to cope with the massive increase in critically 5. Worldometer. South Korea Coronavirus Cases. Dadax Limited; ill patients. 2020 [cited 2020 May 26]. Available from: https://bit.ly/34KP0NW. 4) Differentiate the population into five groups and treat 6. Fineberg HV. Ten weeks to crush the curve. N Engl J Med. accordingly. It is necessary to establish: 1) confirmed 2020. http://doi.org/drwd. cases, 2) suspected (symptomatic) cases, 3) persons exposed to the virus, 4) persons who are not known to have been exposed or infected, and 5) persons who José Ricardo Navarro Vargas. have recovered and are now immune. Regarding the Dean of the Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional first two groups, these people should be separated from de Colombia, Bogotá D.C., Colombia. the general population in facilities temporarily fit for this [email protected] 9 Rev. Fac. Med. 2020 Vol. 68 No. 1: 9-13
ORIGINAL RESEARCH DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.71744 Received: 16/04/2018 Accepted: 05/06/2018
Rev a de la Fac l ad de Med c a
Differences in pain measurement between nurses and physicians in a teaching hospital Diferencias en la medición del dolor entre enfermeros y médicos en un hospital universitario
Jairo Ricardo Moyano-Acevedo1, Bilena Margarita Molina-Arteta1, Edna Matute-Gonzales1, Laura Camargo- Sánchez1 1 Fundación Santafé de Bogotá - Anesthesiology Service - Palliative Care and Pain Service - Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Corresponding author: Jairo Ricardo Moyano-Acevedo. Servicio del Dolor y Cuidado Paliativo, Departamento de Anestesiología, Fundación Santafé de Bogotá. Carrera 7 No. 117-15, office: 728. Telephone number: +57 1 6030303, ext.: 5016. Bogotá D.C. Colombia. Email: [email protected].
Abstract
Introduction: In clinical practice, the administration of opioid analgesics depends on pain in- Moyano-Acevedo JR, Molina-Arteta BM, tensity records from nurses because they are responsible for determining the severity of the Matute-Gonzales E, Camargo-Sánchez L. Differences in pain measurement patient’s complaints; however, discrepancies regarding pain measurement are often observed between nurses and physicians in between physicians and nurses, which can lead to an inadequate use of analgesics. a teaching hospital. Rev. Fac. Med. Objective: To carry out a comparison of pain intensity measurements made by staff 2020;68(1):9-13. English. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed. physicians and nurses in a teaching hospital during the first 24 hours of hospital stay of v68n1.71744. patients with movement-related pain. Methods and methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from the pharmacy database and medical records (opioids prescribed for 1 month, pain intensity, and medication management). The medical records of 634 in patients who were prescribed at least 1 dose of an opioid analgesic were reviewed. Results: The average pain score provided by physicians (5.4/10; SEM=0.17) was signifi- cantly higher than the average pain score reported by nurses (3.5/10; SEM=0.15) (p<0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.371 (95%CI: 0.138-0.563), indicating poor agreement between measurements. Conclusion: A poor agreement between pain measurements made by physicians and nurses during the first 24 hours of hospital stay was found. Bearing in mind that pain measurement is essential for achieving an appropriate treatment, the jointly provision of pain manage- ment education programs to doctors and nurses should be considered, so that they assess pain intensity similarly, thus improving the management of inpatients and their quality of life. Keywords: Analgesics, Opioid; Prescriptions; Pain Management (MeSH).
Resumen
Introducción. En la práctica clínica, la administración de analgésicos opioides depende de los Moyano-Acevedo JR, Molina-Arteta registros de intensidad de dolor realizados por los enfermeros, ya que estos son los responsables BM, Matute-Gonzales E, Camargo- Sánchez L. [Diferencias en la medición de determinar la intensidad de las quejas de los pacientes. Sin embargo, a menudo se observa del dolor entre enfermeros y médicos que existen discrepancias entre médicos y enfermeros profesionales respecto a la medición del en un hospital universitario]. Rev. Fac. dolor, lo que puede llevar a un uso inadecuado de analgésicos. Med. 2020;68(1):9-13. English. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed. Objetivo. Comparar las intensidades de dolor de pacientes con dolor asociado al movimiento v68n1.71744. y registradas por médicos y enfermeros de un hospital universitario durante las primeras 24 horas de hospitalización. Materiales y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de corte trasversal. La información se obtuvo de las historias clínicas y de la base de datos de la farmacia del hospital (opioides prescritos por 1 mes, intensidades de dolor y uso de medicamentos). Se revisaron las historias clínicas de 634 pacientes a los que se les recetó al menos 1 dosis de opioide durante su estancia hospitalaria. Resultados. El puntaje promedio de dolor registrado en el grupo de médicos fue significa- tivamente mayor (5.4/10, SEM=0.17) que el registrado en el grupo de enfermeros (3.5/10; SEM=0.15) (p<0.05). El coeficiente de correlación intra-clase fue 0.371 (IC95%: 0.138-0.563), lo que indica una pobre concordancia entre las mediciones de médicos y enfermeros. Conclusiones. Se observó una pobre concordancia entre la medición del dolor realizada por los enfermeros y los médicos del hospital. Teniendo en cuenta que la medición del dolor es fundamental para lograr un tratamiento adecuado, debe considerarse ofrecer programas de educación en manejo del dolor a médicos y enfermeros de manera conjunta para que su medición sea uniforme, lo que mejorará el manejo de los pacientes hospitalizados y, por tanto, su calidad de vida. Palabras clave: Analgésicos opioides; Prescripciones de medicamentos; Manejo del Dolor (DeCS). Rev. Fac. Med. 2020 Vol. 68 No. 1: 9-13 10
Introduction Routine treatment of pain in patients hospitalized in this teaching hospital includes multimodal analgesia Many barriers prevent proper pain management, including based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, parac- poor pain measurement from health care professionals.1 etamol, and short-acting opioids through different routes However, most data show that assessing pain is impera- of administration and based on the therapeutic guide- tive for achieving good outcomes2,3 and that it is necessary lines considered as most appropriate for each patient. for choosing a treatment and evaluating its efficacy in the At the end of the first 24 hours of hospitalization, each clinical setting. In other words, an effective treatment patient is asked about their level of pain while perform- depends on proper evaluation. ing physical activity or moving their bodies (sitting or In routine clinical practice, inpatients are asked about walking after surgery for the first time or upon admis- the intensity of their pain upon admission, during their sion to the floor in the case of non-surgical patients), stay at least once a day, and upon discharge from their using a scale from 0 to 10, being zero absence of pain hospital stay; the nurse in charge carries out this process. and 10 the worst imaginable pain. The staff doctor and Analgesics are prescribed after the treating physician the nurse manager record these reports independently. measures pain. The multidisciplinary approach to patient For this study, data on socio-demographic charac- care requires agreement between the measurements teristics, clinical diagnosis, prescriptions, prescriber, provided by both professionals. However, said measure- opioid analgesic, and pain (type, duration, and intensity ments may be misleading if the people involved have as recorded by the staff physician or graduated nurse) different perceptions about pain intensity of the patient. were retrieved from the electronic database of the hos- According to the relevant literature, training received pital pharmacy and from the patients’ medical records. by physicians and nurses in pain management is de- The quality of the information collected was assured by ficient.4,5 Previous studies have shown that there are training the team responsible for this task by conducting significant differences in pain intensity assessment be- a pilot study and by double-checking the information. tween doctors and nurses, and that said differences In case of disagreement regarding the data collected, may lead to inadequate treatments because the inter- the researchers who reviewed the databases resolved ventions, for example, increase or reduce dosages of them through consensus. analgesics often based on the pain reports obtained This retrospective study was conducted in a from the nursing records. It should be noted that pain 190-bed teaching hospital. The study population con- is not always measured and that this lack of reporting sisted of 634 patients who were hospitalized for surgical may also result in inadequate treatments.6 and non-surgical treatment and who were prescribed Contemporary analgesia takes into account many as- at least 1 dose of opioid analgesic (codeine, hydroco- pects that can generate pain, but the most important done, hydromorphone, fentanyl, methadone, morphine, analgesic goals are those associated with painful move- oxycodone, pethidine, or tramadol). Patients who were ment,7 given that its inadequate management may result not prescribed any of these opioids, as well as pediat- in late recovery of mobility or previous functional status. ric (younger than 18 years old) and obstetric patients, The presence of diverse types of pain is still problem- were excluded. atic for many people around the world. For example, No experiments on human or animal subjects were several studies report that 75% of the patients feel mod- performed. This study was approved by the institutional erate/extreme pain during the immediate post-surgical ethics committee through Minutes n° CCEI-1647-2011 period.8,9 In low and middle-income countries, the prev- (24/10/2011). Likewise, the principles of the Declara- alence of unspecified chronic pain ranges from 13% to tion of Helsinki13 and the regulations of Resolution 8430 49.4%.10 In Colombia, according to the 2014 National of 1993 for conducting health research in humans were Pain Survey, the intensity of chronic pain was severe in followed.14 41% of the respondents, and 30% of those suffering from chronic pain did not receive treatment for it.11 Further- Statistical analysis more, chronic pain affects people of all ages, and there are even studies on this type of pain in adolescents.12 A descriptive analysis was conducted using measures The objective of the present study was to carry out of central location and dispersion for continuous vari- a comparison of pain intensity measurements made by ables, and the Student’s t test was used to compare staff physicians and nurses in a teaching hospital during continuous variables. Mean, standard deviation (σ), the first 24 hours of hospital stay of patients with move- and maximum and minimum values were calculated for ment-related pain. quantitative variables. If variables were not distribut- ed symmetrically, the median and interquartile ranges Materials and methods were calculated. Qualitative variables were expressed as absolute percentages and relative frequencies. The This is a retrospective and cross-sectional study on the chi-square test was used to compare proportions and pain measurements reported by physicians and nurses to estimate the intra-class correlation coefficient. Anal- over a one-month period in patients hospitalized in a yses were performed for a 2-sided type I error level of university hospital that serves most medical and surgi- 0.05 using the statistical package R. cal specialties. According to a hospital policy, pain must be assessed during the hospital stay (admission and fol- Results low up). To this end, a form that includes the following opioid analgesics is used: hydromorphone, morphine, As mentioned above, the study population consisted of and tramadol; parenteral pethidine; transdermal and 634 hospitalized patients, of which 387 (61.9%) were parenteral fentanyl; and oral codeine, hydrocodone, female. Regarding age ranges, 354(55.5%) were 18 to methadone, and oxycodone. 50 years old, 169 (26.7%) 51-70, and 111 (17.%) were 11 Assessment of pain in a university hospital
older than 70 years old. The most frequent diagnoses . were diseases of the musculoskeletal system (n=100), trauma in different body regions (n=94), non-specific . systemic symptoms (n=8), digestive system disorders (n=70), genitourinary system diseases (n=57), and Pain intensity - neoplasms (n=51). Pain intensity -5 . Pain intensity - Distribution of pain intensity measurements Pain intensity -1 Physicians recorded the pain intensity measurements on admission of 349 patients (55.1%), while nurses .7 did so in 275 patients (43.4%). It should be noted that in 10 patients (1.5%) it was not possible to determine who did this assessment. It was found that, on aver- Figure 2. Distribution of first pain intensity (%) assessment age, physicians rated pain intensity significantly higher by nurses in 275 patients. than nurses: the physicians’ mean intensity was 5.45/10 Source: Own elaboration. (σ: 0.17) (95%CI: 5.13-5.78), while the nurses’ mean pain intensity was 3.55/10 (σ: 0.15) (95%CI: 3.25-3.86). 5, imbs The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.371 (95%CI: 0.138-0.563), indicating poor agreement , Abdomen Genito-urinary tract between pain measurements made by physicians and 15, nurses. Opioids were prescribed for the treatment of Head and neck acute pain in 578 (91.1%) patients, chronic pain in 35 1 , Multiple sites (5.5%), and cancer pain in 17 (2.7%). Finally, their prescription was not undetermined in 4 cases (0.6%). 5, umbar horax , Prevalence of pain Figure 3. Pain location during the worst pain intensity ac- On a scale from 0 to 10, the scores of the 349 patients cording to the patients’ medical records. whose pain intensity was measured by doctors on ad- Source: Own elaboration mission were as follows: 73 (20.9%) reported a 0-2 score; 94 (26.9%), a 3-5 score; and 182, (52.15%) Discussion reported severe to unbearable pain (≥6) (Figure 1). This study reports several relevant findings. One of them is the disagreement in pain intensities reported by each professional group, which reaches a significant 1 . . difference of 1.5/10 (σ: 0.2). This difference is partic- Pain intensity - ularly marked during the worst moment of pain, and is potentially linked to analgesics prescription: some pa- Pain intensity -5 tients may not receive analgesics because the nursing Pain intensity - group does not deem them necessary, or may receive them because doctors consider that pain intensity rang- Pain intensity -1 . .7 es from severe to unbearable. These disagreements in the measurement of pain intensity have been previously documented and the result is poor pain management.15 Pain affected most patients admitted to the hospital, but pain relief in this setting was inadequate. In fact, in Figure 1. Distribution of first pain intensity (%) assessment the sample studied here, 25% to 47% patients present- by physicians in 349 patients. ed severe to unbearable pain during their hospital stay, Source: Own elaboration that is, after undergoing triage. The most influential fac- On the other hand, the following scores were found tor to this situation may be the lack of systematic pain for the 275 patients whose pain intensity measurement measurement, which may require a personal or insti- on admission was performed by nurses: 120 (43.6%) tutional improvement process, as previously reported reported a score 0-2; 84, (30.5%) said their pain was in other scenarios.16 In this research, pain intensity was 3-5; and 71 (25.7%) reported they were experiencing reported in only 55.1% of the patients seen by doctors severe to unbearable pain (≥6) (Figure 2). and in 43.4% of the patients seen by nurses. Background Opioids used for managing severe pain (visual analog and personal conditions, in addition to pain education, scale score, >6/10) were tramadol (43.0%), morphine make a difference in pain measurement and treatment.17 (35.8%), hydromorphone (12.6%), fentanyl (5.3%) Another relevant finding was the need to improve and pethidine (3.3%). pain control through a better evaluation of the intensity According to the medical records, pain was classi- assessment made by physicians and nurses and better fied based on the duration of the symptoms as acute prescription practices of opioid analgesic treatment af- (n=578), chronic (n=35), cancer pain (n=17), and un- ter assessing the reports of patient pain. Only just over defined (n=4). Limbs were the body part in which pain half of patients had their pain intensity assessed by their was most frequently located (Figure 3). physician and even less by nurses. It should be noted Rev. Fac. Med. 2020 Vol. 68 No. 1: 9-13 12 that, in patients with severe pain, tramadol, an analge- References sic comparatively less potent than other opioids, was the drug most frequently prescribed, indicating that the 1. Robinson-Papp J, George MC, Dorfman D, Simpson DM. intensity of pain was not a variable that defined the se- Barriers to Chronic Pain Measurement: A Qualitative Study lection of the opioid to be prescribed. of Patient Perspectives. Pain Med. 2015;16(7):1256-64. In daily practice, nurses play an essential role in http://doi.org/c78r. pain measurement because they tend to have more 2. Pogatzki-Zahn E, Kutschar P, Nestler N, Osterbrink J. A Pro- contact with patients than physicians. However, this spective Multicentre Study to Improve Postoperative Pain: study detected lack of measurements by nurses; both Identification of Potentialities and Problems. Lazzeri C, editor. physicians and nurses should assess the pain of their PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143508. http://doi.org/f8dpz3. patients. The lack of correlation between the rating of 3. Fillingim RB, Loeser JD, Baron R, Edwards RR. Assessment pain intensity by the nurses and physicians may reflect of Chronic Pain: Domains, Methods, and Mechanisms. J Pain. the lack of a systematic approach to pain measurement 2016;17(9 Suppl):T10-20. http://doi.org/f8z4tr. and suggests the need for unified training for both pro- 4. Fishman SM, Young HM, Lucas Arwood E, Chou R, Herr K, Mu- fessional groups, which may lead to better accessibility rinson BB, et al. Core Competencies for Pain Management: to timely pain measurement and efficient analgesic -ad Results of an Interprofessional Consensus Summit. Pain Med. ministration. Effective physician-nurse communication 2013;14(7):971-81. http://doi.org/f4986g. may help build strong professional relationships, keep 5. Nimmaanrat S, Oofuvong M. Attitudes of Medical Students things working, and make people feel included. Regarding Cancer Pain Management : Comparison Between In the hospital setting, measurement of pain intensity Pre- and Post-Lecture Test Findings. Asian Pacific J Cancer could give way to more effective treatments.18 As men- Prev. 2015;16(17):7453-6. http://doi.org/c78s. tioned before, pain documentation needs to be improved 6. Webster F, Bremner S, Oosenbrug E, Durant S, McCartney through institutional educational programs for nurses and CJ, Katz J. From opiophobia to overprescribing: A critical doctors, accompanied by pain monitoring and treatment. scoping review of medical education training for chronic Therefore, postoperative pain measurement and treat- pain. Pain Med. 2017;18(8):1467-75. http://doi.org/f9xdct. ment remain a priority challenge for physicians and nurses. 7. Singh JA, Lewallen DG. Are outcomes after total knee arthro- In addition to pain measurement, this research fo- plasty worsening over time? A time-trends study of activity cused on opioid analgesics because they are essential limitation and pain outcomes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. in the pharmacological management of severe pain. In 2014;15(1):1-9. http://doi.org/f6wpvz. fact, their use can be increased or reduced according to 8. Gan TJ, Habib AS, Miller TE, White W, Apfelbaum JL. Inci- the intensity of pain. Although it may seem redundant, dence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical it is worth stressing that these drugs have an essential pain: results from a US national survey. Curr Med Res Opin. role in pain management, although opiophobia has been 2014;30(1):149-60. http://doi.org/c78t. identified as a barrier to proper pain control. 9. Ohayon MM, Stingl JC. Prevalence and comorbidity of chron- Face-to-face education, as well as other education- ic pain in the German general population. J Psychiatr Res. al initiatives,19 can modify professional behavior20 and 2012;46(4):444-50. http://doi.org/fz36xf. improve the process of drug prescription for patients 10. Jackson T, Thomas S, Stabile V, Han X, Shotwell M, McQueen with severe pain and their adherence to management KA. Chronic Pain Without Clear Etiology in Low- and Mid- guidelines, while preventing abuse and drug addiction.21 dle-Income Countries: A Narrative Review. Anesth Analg. The results of this study describe the patterns of pre- 2016;122(6):2028-39. http://doi.org/f8pbzz. scription and this knowledge may encourage hospitals 11. Guerreo-Liñeiro AM, Gómez-López MP. VIII Estudio Nacional to provide prescribers with friendly face-to-face edu- de Dolor 2014. Prevalencia del dolor crónico en Colombia. Bo- cation as a first step to achieve a similar assessment of gotá: Asociación Colombiana para el Estudio del Dolor; 2014 pain intensity by physicians and nurses. [cited 2019 Jul 12]. Available from: https://bit.ly/2LNH6vT. 12. Saes MDO, Soares MCF. Fatores associados à dor na coluna Conclusion vertebral em adolescentes de escolas públicas de um município do extremo sul do Brasil. Rev Salud Pública. 2017;19(1):105- Bearing in mind that pain measurement is essential for 11. http://doi.org/c78w. providing an appropriate treatment, the jointly provi- 13. World Medical Association (WMA). WMA Declaration of Helsin- sion of pain management education training programs ki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human for both doctors and nurses should be considered, so subjects. Fortaleza: 64th WMA General Assembly; 2013. that they assess pain intensity similarly, thus improving 14. Colombia. Ministerio de Salud. Resolución 8430 de 1993 (oc- the management of inpatients and their quality of life. tubre 4): Por la cual se establecen las normas científicas, técnicas y administrativas para la investigación en salud. Conflicts of interest Bogotá D.C.; octubre 4 de 1993. 15. Martin KD, Van Buren JP, Wake J, Dawson L. Comparison of None stated by the authors. Visual Analog Pain Score Reported to Physician vs Nurse. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(3):300-3. http://doi.org/c782. Funding 16. Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C, Durning SJ. What pro- grammatic assessment in medical education can learn None stated by the authors. from healthcare. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6(4):211-5. http://doi.org/c783. Acknowledgments 17. Gómez-Gómez MM, Osorio-Ramírez A, Díaz-Hernández DP. Formación e identidad profesional: egresados de medici- None stated by the authors. na. Rev Fac Med. 2018;66(3):307-12. http://doi.org/c784. 13 Assessment of pain in a university hospital
18. Hatherley C, Jennings N, Cross R. Time to analgesia and pain 20. Brown JC, Park HS. Longitudinal Student Research Competency: score documentation best practice standards for the Emer- Comparing Online and Traditional Face-to-Face Learning Plat- gency Department - A literature review. Australas Emerg forms. Adv Soc Work. 2016;17(1):44-58. http://doi.org/c786. Nurs J. 2016;19(1):26-36. http://doi.org/c785. 21. Manchikanti L, Abdi S, Atluri S, Balog CC, Benyamin RM, 19. Bakia M, Shear L, Toyama Y, Lasseter A. Understanding the Boswell MV, et al. American Society of Interventional Pain Implications of Online Learning for Educational Productiv- Physicians (ASIPP) guidelines for responsible opioid prescrib- ity. Washington: U.S. Departament of Education Office of ing in chronic non-cancer pain: Part I--evidence assessment. Educational Technology; 2012. Pain Physician. 2012;15(3 Suppl):S1-65. 14 Rev. Fac. Med. 2020 Vol. 68 No. 1: 14-23
ORIGINAL RESEARCH DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73180 Received: 28/06/2018 Accepted: 03/11/2018
Rev a de la Fac l ad de Med c a Systematic review and comparative analysis of pediatric nutrition screening tools validated in Europe and Canada Revisión sistemática y análisis comparativo de las herramientas de tamizaje nutricional en pediatría validadas en Europa y Canadá
Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas1, Olga Lucia Pinzón-Espitia1,2 1 Universidad Nacional de Colombia - Bogotá Campus - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Human Nutrition - Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. 2 Hospital Universitario Mayor-Méderi - Nutrition Service - Bogotá D.C. - Colombia. Corresponding author: Laura Vásquez-Cárdenas. Departamento de Nutrición Humana, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Carrera 30 No. 45-03, building: 471, office: 545. Telephone number: +57 1 316500, ext.: 15131; mobile: +57 3132371035. Bogotá D.C. Colombia. Email: [email protected].
Abstract
Introduction: Nutritional screening is a useful tool for determining the risk of hospital Vásquez-Cárdenas L, Pinzón-Espitia malnutrition; therefore, reviewing the guidelines on its use in the pediatric population is of OL. Systematic review and comparati- ve analysis of pediatric nutrition scree- great importance. ning tools validated in Europe and Objective: To provide recommendations on the use of nutrition screening tools validated Canada. Rev. Fac. Med. 2020;68(1): in Canada and Europe in the Colombian pediatric population. 14-23. English. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73180. Materials and method: A systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA methodol- ogy. The quality of the evidence found in the review was assessed using the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) tool, which was established by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination for assessing preventive actions. Results: Fifteen studies were included in the review as they met the inclusion criteria. In addition, 7 nutrition screening tools were identified (PYMS, iPYMS, PeDiSMART, PNR, STAMP, PMST and STRONGkids). According to guidelines of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, the PYMS, iPYMS and STRONGkids tools simultaneously assess prognostic variables such as current nutritional status, stability, expected improvement or worsening of the condition, and the influence of the disease process in nutritional deterioration. Regarding concurrent validity, data analysis shows that PYMS, iPYMS and PMST have sensitivities >85%, and that PYMS has a specificity >85%. In terms of reproducibility, PEDISMART, STRONGkids, STAMP and PYMS have an acceptable interobserver agreement (k>0.41). Conclusion: Based on the evidence found, which was analyzed in terms of prognostic vari- ables, concurrent validity and reproducibility, the use of the PYMS tool in the clinical practice is suggested. In contrast, hospitals must assess the applicability of the STAMP and iPYMS tools. Keywords: Review; Mass Screening; Malnutrition; Pediatrics; Hospitals (MeSH). Resumen
Introducción. El tamizaje nutricional es una herramienta efectiva que permite establecer Vásquez-Cárdenas L, Pinzón-Espitia OL. el riesgo de desnutrición hospitalaria, por consiguiente es importante revisar las directrices [Revisión sistemática y análisis compara- tivo de las herramientas de tamizaje nu- respecto a su uso en pediatría. tricional en pediatría validadas en Europa Objetivo. Ofrecer recomendaciones sobre el uso de las herramientas de tamizaje nutricio- y Canadá]. Rev. Fac. Med. 2020;68(1): nal validadas en Canadá y Europa en población colombiana. 14-23. English. doi: http://dx.doi. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una revisión sistemática siguiendo la metodología PRISMA. org/10.15446/revfacmed.v68n1.73180. Para la evaluación de la calidad de la evidencia se utilizó la herramienta U.S Preventive Ser- vices Task Force, formulada para medir acciones preventivas por la Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Resultados. Se incluyeron 15 estudios que cumplían los criterios de selección y se identifica- ron 7 herramientas (PYMS, iPYMS, PeDiSMART, PNR, STAMP, PMST y STRONGkids). Según los lineamientos de la Sociedad Europea de Nutrición Clínica y Metabolismo, la PYMS, la iPYMS y la STRONGkids evalúan simultáneamente variables pronósticas como estado nutricional actual, estabilidad, progresión esperada e influencia de la enfermedad. En cuanto a validez concurrente, el análisis de datos muestra que la PYMS, la iPYMS y la PMST tienen sensibilidades >85% y que la PYMS tiene especificidad >85%. Respecto a reproducibilidad, la PEDISMART, la STRONGkids, la STAMP y la PYMS tienen una concordancia inter-observadores aceptable (k>0.41). Conclusión. Según la evidencia analizada en términos de variables pronósticas, validez concurrente y reproducibilidad, se sugiere el empleo en la práctica clínica de la herramien- ta PYMS, mientras que para el uso de la STAMP y la iPYMS las instituciones deben evaluar su aplicabilidad. Palabras clave: Revisión; Tamizaje masivo; Desnutrición; Pediatría; Medicina hospi- talar (DeCS). 15 Pediatric nutrition screening
Introduction The PICO procedure (patient or problem, intervention, comparison and outcomes) was used to define the re- In Colombia, the Ministry of Health has acknowledged, search question,19 and also allowed defining the criteria on the one hand, the impact that malnutrition has on for the selection of the studies. health care and, on the other, the usefulness of nutri- The following types of articles were excluded: 1) tional screening to prevent and reduce the prevalence those without available full texts; 2) those that were not of malnutrition in hospitals.1 original researches, that is, letters to the editor, book The American Dietetic Association defines nutritional chapters, systematic reviews, case reports and posi- screening as the “process of identifying characteristics tion papers, and 3) those that evaluated only excess known to be associated with nutrition problems. Its pur- weight and included extensive nutritional assessment pose is to pinpoint individuals who are malnourished or parameters (such as biochemical analysis), or that did at nutritional risk.”2, p1 With this in mind, screening is con- not employ a method of comparison. In view of the sidered as an indicator of quality of healthcare services above, and as shown in Figure 1, all original studies in in the hospital setting.3,4 However, nutritional screening English, French or Spanish published between 2002 and is not routinely applied in pediatric hospitals since there 2017 that validated a nutritional screening tool in Eu- is no accepted screening tool for these patients, lead- rope or Canada and had a method of comparison were ing to an underestimation of hospital malnutrition.5,6 included. The search was carried out in May 2017 on Currently, malnutrition rates are still considerable in the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Global Health and Dis- Europe and Canada, as well as in Colombia, with a prev- sertations & Theses Global databases using the search alence in pediatric populations between 7% and 16.6% equation (Nutritional Screening) AND (paediatric OR for acute malnutrition, and 2.5% and 22.4% for chron- child) AND malnutrition AND hospital. ic malnutrition.7-12 The checklist of items from the Cochrane Handbook The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutri- was used for data extraction.20 First, the screening tools tion defines malnutrition in pediatrics as “an imbalance found were analyzed according to the guidelines of the between nutrient requirements and intake, resulting in European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism cumulative deficits of energy, protein, or micronutri- (ESPEN) 2002,21 which state that the use of these tools ents that may negatively affect growth, development, should consider 4 variables that impact nutritional risk: and other relevant outcomes”.13, p19 It should be noted current nutritional status, stability, expected progression that while malnutrition harms hospitalized patients of and influence of the disease. Moreover, it clarifies that all ages,14 children are at greater risk13 since it is asso- the first 3 variables must be part of all the instruments, ciated with inadequate growth and development, poor while the fourth is included depending on the relevance school performance and possibly having long-lasting defined by each institution; each one must be assigned a impacts in adulthood.15 score in order to quantify the degree of risk, thus allow- Colombia currently has evidence of the need to make ing the choice of the appropriate path to follow according recommendations on tools that allow, first, to identify to the categories established in the care protocols.21,22 pediatric patients with malnutrition or at risk of mal- Regarding methodology, it has been established that nutrition and, second, to do nutritional screening.5 All the usefulness of screening tools is usually based on this becomes relevant taking into account that children the aspects of predictive validity, concurrent validity, are a population that is vulnerable to hospital malnutri- reproducibility and practicality.23 For this reason, in this tion due to their physiological characteristics since they review the statistics issued by the studies that were car- have greater energy requirements due to other pro- ried out to validate the screening tools were analyzed; cesses such as growth, development and the severity of the selected parameters were sensitivity and specifici- diseases that require hospital admission (acute diarrhea, ty, contained in concurrent validity and reproducibility, primary malnutrition, celiac disease, obesity, dyslipid- respectively. Concurrent sensitivity was understood as emias, among others).16,17 Therefore, this research work the proportion of individuals at risk of malnutrition cor- presents a literature review and comparative analysis of rectly identified by the screening tests and concurrent nutritional screening tools used in pediatrics and validat- specificity was understood as the proportion of indi- ed in Europe and Canada to provide a set of guidelines viduals not at risk correctly identified by the nutritional and recommendations to expand their use in Colombi- screening tool. Sensitivity and specificity, as well as re- an institutions. It also seeks to improve, in the future, producibility, corresponded to data calculated in each healthcare services and manage the prevalence of mal- study considering the selected method of comparison. nutrition in pediatric hospitals. Finally, the quality of evidence was assessed following In summary, this review aims to find whether the in- the recommendations of the U.S Preventive Services Task stitutional use of nutritional screening tools in pediatrics Force, a tool developed by the Canadian Task Force on the allows the timely identification of patients with malnu- Periodic Health Examination to evaluate preventive mea- trition or at risk of malnutrition, as well as the timely sures and to help researchers extract information from referral of patients to nutritional therapy. clinical studies in the form of evidence-based medicine recommendations.24,25 To achieve this, the design of the Materials and methods studies analyzed was considered first in order to establish the level of certainty of each study; then, the nutrition- The present investigation followed the PRISMA (Preferred al screening tools with the same level of certainty were Reporting Items for Sistematic Reviews and Meta-analy- grouped and the degrees of the recommendations were ses) statement, which provides guidelines for conducting established according to the level of certainty assigned systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that and the net benefit (greater number of benefits over the evaluate health interventions in biomedical sciences.18 number of harms) of their use (Table 1). Rev. Fac. Med. 2020 Vol. 68 No. 1: 14-23 16