Severity, Probability and Risk of Accidents During Maritime Transport of Radioactive Material

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Severity, Probability and Risk of Accidents During Maritime Transport of Radioactive Material IAEA-TECDOC-1231 Severity, probability and risk of accidents during maritime transport of radioactive material Final report of a co-ordinated research project 1995–1999 July 2001 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Radiation Safety Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria SEVERITY, PROBABILITY AND RISK OF ACCIDENTS DURING MARITIME TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IAEA, VIENNA, 2001 IAEA-TECDOC-1231 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2001 Printed by the IAEA in Austria July 2001 FOREWORD In the 1990s, the maritime transport of radioactive material, in particular the shipments from France to Japan of plutonium, of high level vitrified wastes and of fresh mixed oxide (MOX) fuel, attracted much publicity. In 1992, a Joint International Atomic Energy Agency/International Maritime Organization/ United Nations Environment Programme Working Group on the Safe Carriage of Irradiated Nuclear Fuel and other Radioactive Materials by Sea considered many safety aspects associated with plutonium transports. The group recommended that the three organizations adopt a draft code of practice for the Safe Carriage of Irradiated Nuclear Fuel, Plutonium, and High Level Radioactive Wastes on Board Ships. The group further considered a number of issues related to accidents at sea, accident statistics, risk studies and emergency response. The group concluded that all the information available in this area demonstrated that there were very low levels of radiological risk and environmental consequences from the transport of radioactive material. The group further recommended that the matter be kept under review by the three organizations involved. In its ninth meeting, held in Vienna in 1993, the Standing Advisory Group on the Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (SAGSTRAM) recommended that a new co-ordinated research project (CRP) be set up to study the fire environment on board ships. This task was meant to tie in with the recommendations of the Joint Working Group to keep matters related to sea transport of radioactive material under review. The resulting CRP on the severity of accidents in the maritime transport of radioactive material involved participants from five countries and extended over a period of approximately five years. This TECDOC represents the final outcome of the work done in the course of many meetings spread over five years. A list of contributors to drafting and review can be found at the end of this report. The IAEA officer responsible for this publication was X. Bernard-Bruls of the Division of Radiation and Waste Safety. EDITORIAL NOTE This publication has been prepared from the original material as submitted by the authors. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the IAEA, the governments of the nominating Member States or the nominating organizations. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries. The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA. The authors are responsible for having obtained the necessary permission for the IAEA to reproduce, translate or use material from sources already protected by copyrights. CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE...............................................................................................................................2 2.1. Type of materials and packaging..............................................................................3 2.2. Types of ships ..........................................................................................................3 2.3. Accident environment ..............................................................................................4 2.4. Effects of accidents ..................................................................................................4 2.5. Summary of the findings..........................................................................................4 3. HOW RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IS TRANSPORTED AT SEA...............................5 3.1. Regulatory framework..............................................................................................6 3.1.1. International regulations...............................................................................6 3.1.2. National regulations .....................................................................................8 3.2. Radioactive material package preparation and shipping process by sea..................8 4. PROBABILITY OF SHIP ACCIDENTS........................................................................10 4.1. Introduction............................................................................................................10 4.1.1. Lloyd's databases........................................................................................10 4.1.2. The MAIB, UK ..........................................................................................11 4.1.3. International Maritime Organization..........................................................11 4.1.4. Bureau Véritas............................................................................................11 4.2. Reference studies and statistical analyses of accidents..........................................11 4.2.1. CEPN/IPSN (January 1999, France) ..........................................................11 4.2.2. SRD - AEA TECHNOLOGY-NTL (UK)..................................................13 4.2.3. SeaRAM - SNL (May 1998, USA) ............................................................14 4.2.4. JNC (November 1998, Japan) ....................................................................14 4.2.5. GRS, EC report (November 1998, Germany) ............................................15 4.3. Main results............................................................................................................15 4.3.1. All categories of accidents .........................................................................16 4.3.2. Fire accidents..............................................................................................16 4.3.3. Collision accidents .....................................................................................18 4.3.4. Collision and fire accidents........................................................................21 4.3.5. Foundering .................................................................................................21 4.4. Discussion..............................................................................................................21 4.5. Use of actual route statistics for theoretical routes ................................................22 5. FIRE BEHAVIOUR ON SHIPS......................................................................................23 5.1. Fire scenarios, frequency, effect of ship type.........................................................23 5.1.1. Fire scenarios..............................................................................................23 5.1.2. Frequency ...................................................................................................24 5.1.3. Effect of ship type ......................................................................................26 5.2. Determination of frequency-probability, severity and duration .............................30 5.2.1. Frequency-probability ................................................................................30 5.2.2. Severity and duration..................................................................................35 5.3. Assessment of risk .................................................................................................39 5.3.1. Lange, et al. ...............................................................................................39 5.3.2. Yamamoto, et al. study on engine room fire ..............................................42 5.3.3. Yamamoto, et al. study on plutonium transport operations .......................42 6. COLLISION SEVERITY ................................................................................................44 6.1. Background ............................................................................................................44 6.2. Mechanics of ship-to-ship collisions......................................................................45 6.3. Magnitude of forces acting on RAM packages......................................................46 6.4. Conclusions............................................................................................................46 7. CONSEQUENCES OF ACCIDENTS TO SHIPS TRANSPORTING RAM PACKAGES..........................................................................................................47 7.1. Hypothetical accidents ...........................................................................................47 7.2. Accident probabilities ............................................................................................47 7.3. Radioactive release to the atmosphere ...................................................................48
Recommended publications
  • Hwang, Yin (2014) Victory Pictures in a Time of Defeat: Depicting War in the Print and Visual Culture of Late Qing China 1884 ‐ 1901
    Hwang, Yin (2014) Victory pictures in a time of defeat: depicting war in the print and visual culture of late Qing China 1884 ‐ 1901. PhD Thesis. SOAS, University of London http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/18449 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. VICTORY PICTURES IN A TIME OF DEFEAT Depicting War in the Print and Visual Culture of Late Qing China 1884-1901 Yin Hwang Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the History of Art 2014 Department of the History of Art and Archaeology School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 2 Declaration for PhD thesis I have read and understood regulation 17.9 of the Regulations for students of the School of Oriental and African Studies concerning plagiarism. I undertake that all the material presented for examination is my own work and has not been written for me, in whole or in part, by any other person.
    [Show full text]
  • Overload Problem
    IJBTS International Journal of Business Tourism and Applied Sciences Vol.2 No.2 July-December2014 AN INNOVATION APPROACH FOR IMPROVING PASSENGER VESSELS SAFETY LEVEL: OVERLOAD PROBLEM N. S. F. ABDUL RAHMAN1, H. Z. ROSLI School of Maritime Business and Management, University Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia. ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to design the conceptual model concerning an innovation overloaded sensor that can be used to detect and reduce the overload problem of passenger ships. A passenger vessel becomes an important mode of transport to transfer people or goods from one destination to other destination. The passenger vessel service generates high income and profit margin to the ship operators. Thus, most ship operators are operating their vessels with over capacity of passengers for a single voyage. By doing that, the voyage and operating costs of the passenger ship can be reduced respectively. The overload passenger vessels scenario leads to the collision or sink of the vessel and also it causes the possibility of passenger death. To overcome this issue, an innovation technology incorporates the elevator concepts using the load sensor (HCC-High Capacity Compression) and use batching controller to setting the minimum and maximum capacities is recommended to be installed at the entry point of the passenger vessels. The number of passenger ship collisions due to the overloaded problem is expected to be reduced using the proposed sensor. Ultimately, the total number of passenger deaths due to this problem will automatically be reduced. Keywords: Passengers Vessels; Overload Problem; Load Sensor; Maritime Tourism Innovation; High Capacity Compressor (HCC).
    [Show full text]
  • A.A.A. - the American Arbitration Association
    A.A.A. - The American Arbitration Association. Corporate Headquarters, E-mail: [email protected]. International Center for Dispute Resolution, E-mail: mailto:[email protected] Website: http://www.adr.org/ A.A.A. - The Association of Average Adjusters - HQS "Wellington", Temple Stairs, Victoria Embankment, London WC2R 2PN. Abandonment [Fr.: " délaissement "] [Span.: " abandono "] [Ital.: " abbandono "] [Gr.: "Abandonnierung "; "Aufgabe eines Rechtsanspruches "] - Abandonment is the giving up by the insured of the proprietary rights in insured property to the underwriter in consideration for payment of a constructive total loss (infra ) or an actual total loss (infra ). See Marine Insurance Act, 1906 (U.K.) sects. 61-63; see also Notice of abandonment (infra ). See Tetley, Int'l M. & A. L. , 2003 at p.612. Abandonment (" abandon ") is also the ancient principle of a shipowner having responsibility only up to the value of the ship and freight (infra ) (but calculated after the collision (infra )). The principle was found in the 1924 Shipowners' Limitation Convention and is still found in the U.S. Shipowners' Limitation of Liability Act , 1851, 46 U.S. Code App. 183. See Tetley, Int'l. C. of L. , 1994 at pp. 510-511, 517-518; Tetley, M.L.C. , 2 Ed., 1998 at pp. 109-110; Tetley, Int'l. M & A. L. , 2003 at pp. 20-21. "Abus de droit" - [Span.: " abuso de derecho "] [Ital.: " abuso di diritto "] [Gr.: "Rechtsmißbrauch "]- A civil law principle of abuse of right due to a flagrant act of a creditor or the possessor of a thing. See Tetley, Int'l. C. of L. , 1994 at p.
    [Show full text]
  • Accidents in the Transport Industry an Analysis of Available Data in Respect of Load Shift Incidents
    Health and Safety Executive Accidents in the transport industry An analysis of available data in respect of load shift incidents Prepared by the Health and Safety Laboratory for the Health and Safety Executive 2008 RR681 Research Report Health and Safety Executive Accidents in the transport industry An analysis of available data in respect of load shift incidents Ed Corbett BSc MSc C Psychol Simon Rice BSc MSc PhD Emma Wilde BSc MSc Charlotte Young BSc MSc Kay Jackson BSc Health and Safety Laboratory Harpur Hill Buxton Derbyshire SK17 9JN The transport industry has for some time been acknowledged as a relatively dangerous industry. One of the key hazards within the transport sector is posed by loads shifting in transit and then falling from vehicles, causing injuries and/ or fatalities. Between 2006 and 2007 HSE identified 5 deaths and over 216 major injuries resulting from objects falling onto people in the ‘freight by road’ industry. A further 946 people received injuries severe enough to require more than three days absence from work (HSE, 2008). The impact of such incidents are not, however, limited to workers within the industry. A load shifting in transit on the public highways and byways can, and have, killed members of the public. Whilst the negative outcomes of what can happen when a load shifts are relatively clear, the reasons as to why loads shift is less clear. Whilst inadequacy of securing methods are bound to play a part, this is possibly just the visible part of deeper issues. The aim of this research has been to explore load security issues, identifying causal and contributory factors to loads shifting.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Arrests in Practice 1 FOREWORD
    SHIP ARRESTS IN PRACTICE ELEVENTH EDITION 2018 A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO SHIP ARREST & RELEASE PROCEDURES IN 93 JURISDICTIONS WRITTEN BY MEMBERS OF THE SHIPARRESTED.COM NETWORK Ship Arrests in Practice 1 FOREWORD Welcome to the eleventh edition of Ship Arrests in Practice. When first designing this publication, I never imagined it would come this far. It is a pleasure to announce that we now have 93 jurisdictions (six more than in the previous edition) examined under the questionnaire I drafted years ago. For more than a decade now, this publication has been circulated to many industry players. It is a very welcome guide for parties willing to arrest or release a ship worldwide: suppliers, owners, insurers, P&I Clubs, law firms, and banks are some of our day to day readers. Thanks are due to all of the members contributing to this year’s publication and my special thanks goes to the members of the Editorial Committee who, as busy as we all are, have taken the time to review the publication to make it the first-rate source that it is. The law is stated as of 15th of January 2018. Felipe Arizon Editorial Committee of the Shiparrested.com network: Richard Faint, Kelly Yap, Francisco Venetucci, George Chalos, Marc de Man, Abraham Stern, and Dr. Felipe Arizon N.B.: The information contained in this book is for general purposes, providing a brief overview of the requirements to arrest or release ships in the said jurisdictions. It does not contain any legal or professional advice. For a detailed synopsis, please contact the members’ law firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Answers Book for Tactical Craft Operations
    READINESS AND TRAINING NAVAL EXPEDITIORNARY COMBAT COMMAND STANDARD ANWSERS BOOK (June 17, 2008) FOR Tactical Craft Operations PQS NAVEDTRA XXXXX-XXX NOTICE Pages 1, 85, 86, 87, 90, 91, 102, 103, 104 105, 106, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 173, 221, 222, 223, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 234, 247, 253, 254, 261, 346, 349, 363 must be printed in COLOR. DISTRIBUTION RESTRICTED: This Publication contains technical or operational information that is for official Government use only. Distribution of this workbook is limited to US Government agencies only. Page intentionally left blank 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 101 Safety...………….………………………………………………………………………….…6 102 Basic Damage Control…..…………...............................................................….....…...18 103 First Aid.............................…...........................................................................……….. 28 104 Life Saving and Survival Systems………………………………………………………..…62 105 Crewman Fundamentals………………………...………………………………………..…75 106 Seamanship…………..……………………………………………………………………….120 107 Launch and Recovery…………..……………………………………………………………130 108 Anchoring…………………..………………………………………………………………….141 109 Towing………………………………..……………………………………………………..…144 110 Mission and Organization…………...............................…...............…......…..…………159 111 Surface engagement with weapons …………..……………………………...……………178 112 Mission Planning ……………………………………………………………………………..188 113 Navigation Rules……………………………………………………………………………...204 114 Navigation Fundamentals………………………………………………………………… 211 115 Communication
    [Show full text]
  • Hornblower's Ships
    Names of Ships from the Hornblower Books. Introduction Hornblower’s biographer, C S Forester, wrote eleven books covering the most active and dramatic episodes of the life of his subject. In addition, he also wrote a Hornblower “Companion” and the so called three “lost” short stories. There were some years and activities in Hornblower’s life that were not written about before the biographer’s death and therefore not recorded. However, the books and stories that were published describe not only what Hornblower did and thought about his life and career but also mentioned in varying levels of detail the people and the ships that he encountered. Hornblower of course served on many ships but also fought with and against them, captured them, sank them or protected them besides just being aware of them. Of all the ships mentioned, a handful of them would have been highly significant for him. The Indefatigable was the ship on which Midshipman and then Acting Lieutenant Hornblower mostly learnt and developed his skills as a seaman and as a fighting man. This learning continued with his experiences on the Renown as a lieutenant. His first commands, apart from prizes taken, were on the Hotspur and the Atropos. Later as a full captain, he took the Lydia round the Horn to the Pacific coast of South America and his first and only captaincy of a ship of the line was on the Sutherland. He first flew his own flag on the Nonsuch and sailed to the Baltic on her. In later years his ships were smaller as befitted the nature of the tasks that fell to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Admiralty's in Extremis Doctrine: What Can Be Learned from the Restatement (Third) of Torts Approach? Craig H
    University of Washington School of Law UW Law Digital Commons Articles Faculty Publications 2012 Admiralty's In Extremis Doctrine: What Can Be Learned from the Restatement (Third) of Torts Approach? Craig H. Allen University of Washington School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Admiralty Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Craig H. Allen, Admiralty's In Extremis Doctrine: What Can Be Learned from the Restatement (Third) of Torts Approach?, 43 J. Mar. L. & Com. 155 (2012), https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/80 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at UW Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of UW Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Maritime Law & Commerce, Vol. 43, No. 2, April, 2012 Admiralty's In Extremis Doctrine: What Can be Learned from the Restatement (Third) of Torts Approach? Craig H. Allen* I INTRODUCTION The in extremis doctrine has been part of maritime collision law in the U.S. for more than one hundred and sixty years. One would expect that a century and a half would provide ample time for mariners and admiralty practitioners and judges to master the doctrine. Alas, some of the profes- sional nautical commentary and even an occasional collision case suggest that the doctrine is often misunderstood or misapplied. A fair number of admiralty writers fail to understand that the in extremis doctrine is not a sin- gle "in extremis rule," but rather several rules, all of which are related to the existence of a somewhat poorly defined "in extremis situation." Some prac- titioners and mariners also appear to believe the in extremis "rule" has been fully codified into the present Collision Regulations (either in Rule 2(b) or 17(b) or perhaps both) obviating recourse to the general maritime law cases.
    [Show full text]
  • The Weeping Monument: a Pre and Post Depositional Site
    THE WEEPING MONUMENT: A PRE AND POST DEPOSITIONAL SITE FORMATION STUDY OF THE USS ARIZONA by Valerie Rissel April, 2012 Director of Thesis: Dr. Brad Rodgers Major Department: Program in Maritime History and Archaeology Since its loss on December 7, 1941, the USS Arizona has been slowly leaking over 9 liters of oil per day. This issue has brought about conversations regarding the stability of the wreck, and the possibility of defueling the 500,000 to 600,000 gallons that are likely residing within the wreck. Because of the importance of the wreck site, a decision either way is one which should be carefully researched before any significant changes occur. This research would have to include not only the ship and its deterioration, but also the oil’s effects on the environment. This thesis combines the historical and current data regarding the USS Arizona with case studies of similar situations so a clearer picture of the future of the ship can be obtained. THE WEEPING MONUMENT: A PRE AND POST DEPOSITIONAL SITE FORMATION STUDY OF THE USS ARIZONA Photo courtesy of Battleship Arizona by Paul Stillwell A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Program in Maritime Studies Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Masters in Maritime History and Archaeology by Valerie Rissel April, 2012 © Valerie Rissel, 2012 THE WEEPING MONUMENT: A PRE AND POST DEPOSITIONAL SITE FORMATION STUDY OF THE USS ARIZONA by Valerie Rissel APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS______________________________________________________________________ Bradley Rodgers, Ph.D. COMMITTEE MEMBER________________________________________________________ Michael Palmer, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Digest 1.2.Qxd
    Volume 1, Number 2 2003 A G R A S E N T L T A S W E A I G N D D P O L I C Y http://www.olemiss.edu/orgs/SGLC Volume 1, Number 2 Sea Grant Law Digest 2003 Page 2 Journals featured in this issue of the LAW AND POLICY DIGEST. For more information, click on the name of the journal. • CANADA-UNITED STATES LAW JOURNAL • COASTAL MANAGEMENT • ENDANGERED SPECIES UPDATE • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE AND COASTAL LAW • MARINE POLICY • OCEAN AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT • OHIO STATE LAW JOURNAL • STANFORD LAW REVIEW Volume 1, Number 2 Sea Grant Law Digest 2003 Page 3 THE SEA GRANT LAW AND POLICY DIGEST is a bi-annual publication index- ing the law review and other articles in the fields of ocean and coastal law and policy published with- in the previous six months. Its goal is to inform the Sea Grant community of recent research and facil- itate access to those articles. The staff of the Digest can be reached at: the Sea Grant Law Center, Kinard Hall, Wing E - Room 256, P.O. Box 1848, University, MS 38677-1848, phone: (662) 915-7775, or via e-mail at [email protected] . Editor: Stephanie Showalter, J.D., M.S.E.L. Publication Design: Waurene Roberson Research Associates: Tracy Bowles, 2L Joseph Long, 2L Jason Savarese, 2L This work is funded in part by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce under Grant Number NA16RG2258, the Sea Grant Law Center, Mississippi Law Research Institute, and University of Mississippi Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance Dropfleet Reference Sheet Official Rules Edition*
    Resistance Dropfleet Reference Sheet Official Rules Edition* Super Heavy Grand Battleship Scan Sig Thrust Hull A PD G T Pts Special Trident / Elysium 8” 14” 6” 24 2+ 10 1 S 340 Ablative Armour Weapon Lock Attack Damage Arc Special 9k Mass Driver Turrets 2+ 4 1 F/S (L) Fusillade-4 9k Mass Driver Turrets 2+ 4 1 F/S (R) Fusillade-4 N-12 Artillery Cannon Battery 4+ 10 1 S (L) Linked-1, Low Power N-12 Artillery Cannon Battery 4+ 10 1 S (R) Linked-1, Low Power NC-16 Missiles 3+ D3+1 1 F/S/R Close Action Load Launch Special Torpedo 1 Limited (4) Grand Battleship Scan Sig Thrust Hull A PD G T Pts Special Olympus / Eden 8” 14” 6” 24 2+ 10 1 S 360 Ablative Armour Weapon Lock Attack Damage Arc Special 9k Mass Driver Turrets 2+ 4 1 F/S (L) Fusillade-4 9k Mass Driver Turrets 2+ 4 1 F/S (R) Fusillade-4 Mega Vent Cannon Battery 3+ 3D3 2 S (L) Linked-1, Overcharge, Scald, Unstable Mega Vent Cannon Battery 3+ 3D3 2 S (R) Linked-1, Overcharge, Scald, Unstable NC-16 Missiles 3+ D3+1 1 F/S/R Close Action Load Launch Special Torpedo 1 Limited (4) Battlecruiser Scan Sig Thrust Hull A PD G T Pts Special Phalanx 6” 8” 6” 17 2+ 5 1 S 200 Ablative Armour Weapon Lock Attack Damage Arc Special 9k Twin Mass Driver Turrets 2+ 4 1 F/S Fusillade-4 N-31 Hybrid Gun Long Battery 4+ 9 1 S (L) Linked-1 N-31 Hybrid Gun Long Battery 4+ 9 1 S (R) Linked-1 NC-4 Missiles 4+ 4 1 F/S/R Close Action Battlecruiser Scan Sig Thrust Hull A PD G T Pts Special Tribune 6” 8” 6” 17 2+ 5 1 S 210 Ablative Armour Weapon Lock Attack Damage Arc Special 9k Mass Driver Turret 2+ 2 1 F/S Fusillade-2
    [Show full text]
  • Emergency Response Punning for Transport Accidents Mvolving Radioactive Materials
    IAEA-TECDOC- 262 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PUNNING FOR TRANSPORT ACCIDENTS MVOLVING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS A TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ISSUED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, VIENNA, 1982 EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANNIN TRANSPORR GFO T ACCIDENTS INVOLVING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS, IAEA, VIENNA, 1982 IAEPintee th AustriAn y i d b a March 1982 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK The IAEA doe t maintaisno n stock f reportso thin si s series. However, microfiche copie f thesso e reportobtainee b n sca d from MicrofichS IM e Clearinghouse International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramerstrasse 5 0 10 x P.OBo . A-1400 Vienna, Austria on prepayment of Austrian Schillings 40.00 or against one IAEA microfiche service coupon. FOREWORD Radioactive materials are a part of modern technology and life. They are used, for example, in medicine, industrial manufacturing, research, defense, electrical power productio hosa f wayn o ti sd thaan n t affect r dailou y lives. Like other materials, radioactive material e transportear s d from place to place by all modes of transportation. It is estimated that 8 to 10 million packages containing radioactive material e transportear s d each year throughou worlde th e amount Th . f radioactivitto thesn i y e packages varies from virtually negligible amounts use n consumei d r productse th , small amounts used for medical purposes, to very large amounts such as in shipments of irradiated nuclear fuels. The vast majority of these package e transportesar d safely wit o damaghn theo t er releasmo f o e their contents.
    [Show full text]