Cadastral Patterns in Louisiana: a Colonial Legacy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1978 Cadastral Patterns in Louisiana: a Colonial Legacy. Carolyn Oliver French Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation French, Carolyn Oliver, "Cadastral Patterns in Louisiana: a Colonial Legacy." (1978). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3201. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3201 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)” . If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again — beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation. Silver prints of "photographs" may be ordered at additional charge by writing the Order Department, giving the catalog number, title, author and specific pages you wish reproduced. 5. PLEASE NOTE: Some pages may have indistinct print. Filmed as received. Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 7815625 FRENCH# CAROLYN OLIVER caoa3Tral patterns i n louxsianai a colonial legacy* t h e LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND AGRICULTURAL AND MECHANICAL CQLm PH.D.* 1978 University Microfilm s International 300 n z e e b r o a d , a n n a r b o r , mi 48106 © 1978 CAROLYN OLIVER FRENCH ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CADASTRAL PATTERNS IN LOUISIANA: A COLONIAL LEGACY A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Antrhopology by Carolyn Oliver French B.A., Northeast Louisiana State College, 1964 M.A., Northeast Louisiana University, 1972 May, 1978 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I am well aware of the debt that I owe to a great many indivi duals who contributed directly and indirectly to the completion of this project. Full acknowledgment of their aid and influence is not a simple matter. Patricular expression of appreciation is due Dr. Sam B. Hilliard and Dr. Milton B. Newton, whose encouragement and criticism have been invaluable as a guiding force in my work, and to Dr. Fred B. Kniffen, who first brought me into geography as a profession and whose unwaver ing confidence has sustained me. I also want to acknowledge with gratitude the patient and profes sional assistance of several persons in the State Land Office, especi ally Ory Poret, Joy Davis Eaton, Helen Olivier and Stella Hatten. Their contributions not only made the work possible, but also did much to make it pleasant and personally rewarding. Others in parish court houses and numerous archives have also been generous with their help. A special note of gratitude is due my family and friends, whose continued interest and concern are immensely important and deeply appre ciated. Perhaps it would be appropriate to follow the example of the Ahtenians, who erected a statue to "the unknown God", to insure that no deity had been omitted. I might likewise offer acknowledgment to those who have influenced my work in general. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................... ii ILLUSTRATIONS ................................................... v TABLES ............................................................ vii ABSTRACT ............. viii INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 Chapter I. LAND POLICIES IN THE FLORIDA P A R I S H E S ................ 32 A. Political Controversy and Land Policies ......... 34 B. Colonial Land Policies .......................... 41 1. French Land Policy ............................. 41 2. British Land Policy ................ ..... 43 3. Spanish Land P o l i c y ........................... 45 C. United States Land P o l i c y ...................... 49 II. CHARACTERISTICS OF LAND GRANTS ......................... 57 A. Variations in Legal Bases ......................... 57 B. Variations in S h a p e ............................. .. 78 C. Variations in S i z e .............................. 97 D. Correlations in Legal Bases, Shape and Size . 105 III. SPATIAL PATTERNS OF LAND C L A I M S ....................... H O A. Distributional Variance and Topography ............ 112 B. Spatial Variation and Date of Settlement ...... 123 C. Trend Toward Clustering of Types ................... 136 D. Variation of Survey Implementation ................ 139 IV. EVALUATION OF LAND GRANTS AS AN INDEX OF SETTLEMENT ............................................... 144 A. Evidence of Cultivation and Habitation ............ 145 B. Correlation of Place-Names with Claimants' Names . 158 C. Surnames as an Index of Kin-related Settlement . 165 D. Estimates of Extent of Grant-related Settlement . 170 V. CONCLUSION ................................................ 184 SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................... 189 APPENDIX I . ................................................. 198 iii Page APPENDIX I I .......................................................... 202 APPENDIX I I I ........................................................ 203 APPENDIX I V .......................................................... 205 APPENDIX V .......................................................... 207 APPENDIX V I .......................................................... 209 APPENDIX V I I ........................................................ 211 VITA ................................................................. 212 Iv ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page Introduction 1. Extent of the American Rectangular Land Survey System . 5 2. Private Land Claims Within the Public Domain ............ 7 3. Florida Parishes ........................................... 9 4. Private Land Grants in the Florida Parishes .............. 11 5. Land Grants: Numerical Distinctiveness (St. Tammany Parish, T.7S, R.14E) 12 6. Sample Townships ........................................... 27 Chapter 1 1. United States Division of West Florida, 1 8 1 2 ............ 50 Chapter 2 1. Long-lots in Louisiana .................................... 83 2. Long-lots in Ranges, East Baton Rouge Parish ............ 84 3. Rectangular Long-lots (models) ......... 86 4. Trapezoidal Long-lots (models) ........................... 86 5. British Long-lots (St. Tammany Parish, T.8S, R.11E, s. 45, 46, 47, 49, and 50) 88 6. Square Grants Based on Spanish Patents .................. 91 7. U.S. Settlement Grants: Shape (Tangipahoa Parish, T.4S, R.8E) ............................................... 92 8. Irregular Grants (models) ............. 94 9. Shapes of G r a n t s ........................................... 96 10. Unity of Grants Divided by Township Boundaries (East Baton Rouge Parish) ............................... 98 11. Size of G r a n t s ................................................102 12. Fragmentation of Grants ....................................... 104 13. Proportions of Grants (Total Equals 261 Complete: 186 Incomplete: 617 Settlement) ........................ 106 Chapter 3 1. Florida Parishes, Physiography ........................... 113 2. Florida Parishes, Physiography and Grants ................ 115 3. Dates of Origin for Claims (sample) ....................... 127 4. Dates of Claims ................................................130 5. Types of Grants and Dates of Claims ......................... 132 6. Grants Oriented to Roads (East Feliciana Parish, T.1S, R.l and 2 E ) ...........................................138 7. Survey Dates for Townships ................................ 141 v Figure Page Chapter 4 1. F i e l d s .......................................................... 151 2. Fields on the Edge of Floodplain ........................ 152 3. Fields in Second Bottoms .....................................