Fox News Was Right to Drop Dick Morris

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fox News Was Right to Drop Dick Morris Fox News Was Right to Drop Dick Morris I used to appreciate the Fox News appearances of former Bill Clinton adviser, Dick Morris. I thought he brought a unique and informed perspective to his political analysis. His observations were insightful, his take on events made sense, and his bold predictions were thought- provoking. Many others clearly felt the same way. In addition to pulling in a lot of domestic and international consulting work during his time with Fox, he also wrote a barrage of books that did quite well thanks to heavy (and routinely over-the-top) self- promotion on the news network. Morris has an undeniable gift for successfully laying out his unconventional observations with logical arguments that strike a chord with people. That gift has made him an intriguing public figure and a regular fixture on Fox News’ prime-time lineup over the years. With that being said, Fox absolutely did the right thing by choosing not to renew Morris’ contract this year. In the end, the decision came down to, as Morris inferred on Piers Morgan’s CNN show this week, simple credibility. Morris was being paid by Fox not just for his gift for gab, but also for his expertise. And when you’re being paid for your expertise, you have to demonstrate that the claims you make – especially when you make them with absolute certainty – are ‘right’ more often than not. Sure, you can get away with sometimes being wrong, but Morris’ big problem is that he was almost always wrong. The final straw was his most recent and now most famous flub: His unabashed insistence that Mitt Romney would not only win the 2012 presidential election, but win it in a “landslide”. His long history of botching forecasts, however, certainly predates last year’s election. Here are just a few of the more notable examples: Morris told us that the Republicans would take the U.S. Senate in 2010. Two years later, he told us the same thing, declaring a pick-up of 10 seats including easy victories for candidates that in some cases ended up losing by wide margins. He told us in 2011 that it was “very possible” that President Obama wouldn’t even run for re-election due to poor poll numbers. He told us that Donald Trump was going to run for the presidency, had a “good shot” at winning the Republican nomination, and could likely beat Obama in the general election. He told us that the 2008 presidential race would be between Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice. His rationale was that Obama couldn’t beat Clinton, and the Republicans would “never” elect John McCain as their general election candidate. I could list several more, but you probably get my point. Sure, lots of reputable people get predictions wrong, but Morris has built his reputation largely on his proclaimed ability to read the electorate, interpret the political tides, and fearlessly predict outcomes – outcomes that he portrays as inevitable. It’s what got him a position in the Clinton White House and it’s what got him a position on Fox News. Morris has marketed himself on that expertise, distinguished himself with it, and has earned quite a living off of it. Such a person should be held to the level of competence that they’ve set for them self. When that person can’t even come close to performing at that level, what exactly is their value as an expert? I think that’s the question the higher-ups at Fox News finally asked themselves after the presidential election. As the saying goes, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me consistently, why are we still paying this guy?” I figured out a while back that Morris’ predictions should be taken with a grain of salt, and I think many others reached the same conclusion even before the 2012 election. You just can’t be routinely wrong and expect people to keep putting stock in what you have to say. While some have suggested that Morris knowingly misleads viewers and readers in order to help the candidates and organizations he supports, I’m not all that convinced. He may very well believe in his own prophecies and his own hype. If that’s the case, I wish him luck in his future endeavors. I just won’t be missing him on Fox. The irony is that if Dick Morris had been right about the Romney “landslide”, his past goofs would have been largely forgotten, and his winning gamble would have certainly propelled him onto the A-list of this country’s great political minds. But as any good capitalist knows, risk doesn’t always lead to reward. When someone puts themselves as far out on the edge of a diving board as Morris did, they have to understand that the big splash they’re about to make might just come in the form of a belly-flop..
Recommended publications
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes a Great Judge? Update for Those
    ssttarar--nneewwss 4 The Goodland Star-News / Friday, October 14, 2005 opinion from our viewpoint... What makes a great judge? Most mouths dropped a foot when President George Bush nominated his friend and counsel Harriet Meirs to be a Su- preme Court Justice. His nomination of Meirs to replace retiring judge Sandra Day O’Connor does preserve the gender balance, but with- out any judicial background Meirs may be the first outsider to be nominated to the highest court of the land. Meirs is a corporate lawyer, and a longtime loyal friend of Bush, which makes many conservatives feel she will de- cide cases along the same ideological lines as President Bush would himself given the opportunity to appoint him- self to the high court. Her unknown quantity as a sitting judge gives others wild speculation about how she will address complex cases, and they are nervous because of that uncertainty. We have no illusions that Meirs is anything but a person with true politically conservative leanings. That is a given, but what is interesting is that she would be the first justice who would not have a lot of legal baggage tied up in previ- ous rulings from the bench. To many there is a sense the legal system is a bit inbred now with all the requirements that anyone who is a judge must first be a lawyer. Having a fresh look at the judicial decisions by someone who has not made hundreds before Update for those feline fanciers could be a good thing both for the court and for the entire Cats.
    [Show full text]
  • True Conservative Or Enemy of the Base?
    Paul Ryan: True Conservative or Enemy of the Base? An analysis of the Relationship between the Tea Party and the GOP Elmar Frederik van Holten (s0951269) Master Thesis: North American Studies Supervisor: Dr. E.F. van de Bilt Word Count: 53.529 September January 31, 2017. 1 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page intentionally left blank 2 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Table of Content Table of Content ………………………………………………………………………... p. 3 List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………. p. 5 Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………..... p. 6 Chapter 2: The Rise of the Conservative Movement……………………….. p. 16 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 16 Ayn Rand, William F. Buckley and Barry Goldwater: The Reinvention of Conservatism…………………………………………….... p. 17 Nixon and the Silent Majority………………………………………………….. p. 21 Reagan’s Conservative Coalition………………………………………………. p. 22 Post-Reagan Reaganism: The Presidency of George H.W. Bush……………. p. 25 Clinton and the Gingrich Revolutionaries…………………………………….. p. 28 Chapter 3: The Early Years of a Rising Star..................................................... p. 34 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 34 A Moderate District Electing a True Conservative…………………………… p. 35 Ryan’s First Year in Congress…………………………………………………. p. 38 The Rise of Compassionate Conservatism…………………………………….. p. 41 Domestic Politics under a Foreign Policy Administration……………………. p. 45 The Conservative Dream of a Tax Code Overhaul…………………………… p. 46 Privatizing Entitlements: The Fight over Welfare Reform…………………... p. 52 Leaving Office…………………………………………………………………… p. 57 Chapter 4: Understanding the Tea Party……………………………………… p. 58 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 58 A three legged movement: Grassroots Tea Party organizations……………... p. 59 The Movement’s Deep Story…………………………………………………… p.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Fans Ready for Texas Bowl the Bottom of the Barrel Democrat Iraq Weakness Is Bush's Strength
    ssttaarr--nneewwss 4 The Goodland Star-News / Friday, December 22, 2006 opinion from our viewpoint... Wildcat fans ready for Texas Bowl Local Kansas State University fans will be able to watch the K-State Wildcats and the Rutgers Scarlett Knights do battle in the inaugural Texas Bowl in Houston’s Reliant Stadium on Dec. 28. The game will be on the NFL Network. S&T cable will carry it on Channel 35, and Eagle will carry it on Channel 45. Apparently that isn’t the case across the state. In fact, our own Sen. Pat Roberts talked with National Football League Commis- sioner Roger Goodell, urging him to permit Kansans to watch the televised coverage of what could be one whale of a bowl game. A news release from the senator leads one to believe Kansans won’t be able to watch the game. We don’t know what area or ar- eas of the state the senator is referring to, but out here we are al- ready popping the corn, chilling the refreshments, cleaning off the grill and getting ready for the showdown. If you have friends in areas of the state that won’t be able to watch the game, invite them out, much like you would pheasant hunters to experience some of the advantages of small, rural town life. It’s not often we can brag about having something they don’t. In a news release from Sen. Roberts, he says: “Every Kansan should be able to cheer on their team, be it the Wildcats, the Jayhawks or the Shockers.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Assurances of Female Political Leaders: Hillary Clinton On
    “Measuring the Assurances of Female Political Leaders: Hillary Clinton on the Campaign Trail” Paper presented to panel B10: “Responsiveness and Representation” May 31, 201, 10:30-12 pm, CL 305 Annual meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Regina Saskatchewan, May 30-June 1, 2018 Abstract: A well-established maxim within the political leadership literature holds that most leaders, most of the time, seek to assure citizens in their public communications. The provision of such certainty is thought to be integral to the exercise of leadership: uncertain citizens seek advice and reassurance, and so they turn to political leaders who can provide such goods (Downs, 1957). This understanding has been studied empirically mainly with respect to male leaders (de Clercy, 2005). This study asks: do female political leader also communicate certainty and uncertainty to citizens and, if so, how may such messages compare with those of male leaders? The study focuses on Hillary Clinton, the first woman to campaign for the American presidency. Leader communications are evaluated by analysing the content of Clinton’s three televised 2016 presidential debate performances using Atlas.ti, a qualitative content analysis program. These findings are compared with the same speech sets for her opponent, Donald Trump. Then, these values are compared with similar data for a sample of two other male presidential candidates. The study finds Clinton fits the role of a classic transactional leader and given the small number of cases under study here, there seems to be no systematic difference in how she communicated assurances to citizens based on her gender. Copyright Cristine de Clercy, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Raphael Trotman Interviewer
    An initiative of the National Academy of Public Administration, and the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs and the Bobst Center for Peace and Justice, Princeton University Oral History Program Series: Elections Interview no.: L6 Interviewee: Raphael Trotman Interviewer: Varanya Chaubey Date of Interview: 8 May 2009 Location: Georgetown Guyana Innovations for Successful Societies, Bobst Center for Peace and Justice Princeton University, 83 Prospect Avenue, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544, USA www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties Use of this transcript is governed by ISS Terms of Use, available at www.princeton.edu/successfulsocieties Innovations for Successful Societies Series: Elections Oral History Program Interview number: L-6 ______________________________________________________________________ CHAUBEY: Today is May 8th, 2009. My name is Varanya Chaubey, and I’m sitting here with Mr. Raphael Trotman, who is a member of Parliament and leader of the Alliance for Change [AFC] party in Guyana. Thank you so much, Mr. Trotman, for agreeing to participate in this interview. TROTMAN: Thank you. CHAUBEY: We’d like to begin by asking a little bit about your personal background. Would you describe briefly the path that you took to get here, and what you are doing with the AFC now? TROTMAN: Personal background. Well, I am a lawyer professionally. I never envisaged a career in politics, quite frankly. After graduating from law school, I found myself drawn to politics, but with a desire to not just be involved or to find myself being elected but to make some positive change or bring about some positive change. I’ve always had a passion as well for conflict, understanding conflict and resolving it.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Stephen D. Potts on OGE
    REAUTHORIZATION OF THE OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON THE CIVIL SERVICE OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION August 4, 1999 Serial No. 106±134 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/congress/house http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 65±930 CC WASHINGTON : 2000 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 12:24 Aug 29, 2000 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\65930.TXT HGOVREF1 PsN: HGOVREF1 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland TOM LANTOS, California CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut ROBERT E. WISE, JR., West Virginia ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida MAJOR R. OWENS, New York JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York STEPHEN HORN, California PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania JOHN L. MICA, Florida PATSY T. MINK, Hawaii THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York DAVID M. MCINTOSH, Indiana ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana DC JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland MARSHALL ``MARK'' SANFORD, South DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio Carolina ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois BOB BARR, Georgia DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois DAN MILLER, Florida JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas JIM TURNER, Texas LEE TERRY, Nebraska THOMAS H. ALLEN, Maine JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois HAROLD E. FORD, JR., Tennessee GREG WALDEN, Oregon JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois DOUG OSE, California ÐÐÐ PAUL RYAN, Wisconsin BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont HELEN CHENOWETH, Idaho (Independent) DAVID VITTER, Louisiana KEVIN BINGER, Staff Director DANIEL R.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2013 Remarks at the White House
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2013 Remarks at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner April 27, 2013 White House Correspondents' Association President Ed Henry. And without further ado, I'd like to introduce the President of the United States. [At this point "Hail to the Chief" began to play. The music then changed to "All I Do Is Win" by rap artist DJ Khaled.] The President. Thank you. Thank you, everybody. [Laughter] How do you like my new entrance music? Rush Limbaugh warned you about this. Second term, baby. [Laughter] We're changing things around here a little bit. [Laughter] Actually, my advisers were a little worried about the new rap entrance music. [Laughter] They are a little more traditional. They suggested that I should start with some jokes at my own expense, just take myself down a peg. I was like, guys, after 4½ years, how many pegs are there left? [Laughter] I want to thank the White House correspondents. Ed, you're doing an outstanding job. We are grateful for—the great work you've done. To all the dignitaries who are here, everybody on the dais—I especially want to say thank you to Ray Odierno, who does outstanding service on behalf of our country, and all our men and women in uniform every single day. And of course, our extraordinary First Lady, Michelle Obama. Everybody loves Michelle. [Laughter] She's on the cover of Vogue, high poll numbers. But don't worry, I recently got my own magazine cover. [Laughter] [An image of a magazine titled "Senior Leisure" with a photo of the President and Vice President Biden playing golf was shown.] Now, look, I get it.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council’ Legislature Waging Home Rule Assault by BRIAN A
    V16, N32 Thursday, April 21, 2011 Indiana’s new super ‘City Council’ Legislature waging home rule assault By BRIAN A. HOWEY PLAINFIELD - Most Hoosiers living in cities and towns probably believe their mayors and council members create their local ordinances. But the 2011 Indiana General Assembly has been on an as- sault of “home rule.” It goes far beyond the plea of cities for local taxing options. IACT, cringes when it comes to SB292 sponsored by fresh- Indiana’s emerging “City Council” at the Statehouse men Sen. Jim Tomes and Rep. Mike Speedy. It takes away is poised to take away municipal rights when it comes to the ability for cities and towns to regulate where individu- where weapons can be fired and carried, whether nursing als may carry and fire a gun. The bill was amended in the homes can be built, whether fire districts can be estab- House to allow certain local regulation of gun discharge. lished while one bill will prevent local apartment inspec- However, some are working to reverse the amendment. “I tions. really don’t care that people carry guns,” said Seybold. “But “In this era of property tax caps, for the most part when someone can fire a gun in their backyard and there’s cities have done a pretty good job of dealing with those nothing a city can do about it, that’s a problem. That might cuts,” said Matt Greller, executive director of the Indiana be OK in a smaller rural community, but let them debate Association of Cities and Towns.
    [Show full text]
  • Information to Users
    INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may t>e from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6” x 9" black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. UMI* Bell & Howell Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 University of Oklahoma Graduate College The Tenuous Majority: The Effect of Two-Party Competition on the House of Representatives A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOHN P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight of 1950S Women Against Communism and the Rise of Conservatism by Lori May
    Housewives With A Mission: The Fight of 1950s Women Against Communism and the Rise of Conservatism By Lori May Photo of the Cleaver family from the television program Leave it to Beaver. From left: Hugh Beaumont (Ward), Tony Dow (Wally), Barbara Billingsley (June), Jerry Mathers (Theodore AKA "Beaver"). 8 January 1960. ABC Television. Television shows such as, Leave it to Beaver, The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet and Father Knows Best, filled the airwaves, and magazines such as McCalls and Good Housekeeping lined the news stands with pictures of the American way of life in the 1950s. A suburban, middle class life where families lived in a furnished and newly equipped modern home, complete with car, two children and a dog. Where father went to work and mother stayed at home baking and taking care of the family and left the cares of the world to her husband.[1] However, alongside this picture of an ideal America, the media presented the Red Scare, and the threat of communist infiltration that would destroy this American way of life. A considerable portion of white, educated, middle-class housewives and mothers content in their role as wives and mothers embraced the prevailing Red Scare and its rhetoric of anti- Communism and the cult of motherhood, which promoted mothers as defenders of morality and the American way of life against the threat of communism. As a result they established grassroots activities within their children’s schools, and communities and exercised a conservative political voice that would ultimately shift the Republican Party from a democratic moderate party to a more fundamentally conservative right wing party that nominated Barry Goldwater for president in 1964 and placed Ronald Reagan as governor of California in 1966, thus making conservatism mainstream.[2] The activism of middle class, suburban housewives after WWII in their role as mothers was not a new phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN EXPERIENCE Presents Clinton
    AMERICAN EXPERIENCE Presents Clinton Newest Entry in the Acclaimed AMERICAN EXPERIENCE Presidents Collection Profiles the 42nd President Part 1 premieres Monday, February 20, 2012 9:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m. ET on PBS Part 2 premieres Tuesday, February 21, 2012 8:00 p.m. - 10:00 p.m. ET on PBS From draft dodging to the Dayton Accords, from Monica Lewinsky to a balanced budget, the presidency of William Jefferson Clinton veered between sordid scandal and grand achievement. In Clinton, the latest installment in the critically acclaimed and successful collection of presidential biographies, AMERICAN EXPERIENCE explores the fascinating story of an American president who rose from a turbulent childhood in Arkansas to become one of the most successful politicians in modern American history and one of the most complex and conflicted characters ever to stride across the public stage. It recounts a career full of accomplishment and rife with scandal, a marriage that would make history and create controversy, and a presidency that would define the crucial and transformative period between the fall of the Berlin Wall and 9/11. It follows Clinton across his two terms as he confronted some of the key forces that would shape the future, including partisan political warfare and domestic and international terrorism, and struggled, with uneven success, to define the role of American power in a post-Cold War world. Most memorably, it explores how Clinton’s conflicted character made history, even as it enraged his enemies and confounded his friends. From Emmy and Peabody Award-winning director Barak Goodman (My Lai), the four-hour Clinton will premiere in two parts on PBS.
    [Show full text]