Read the Full PDF

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Read the Full PDF The Permanent Campaign and Its Future The Permanent Campaign and Its Future Norman J. Ornstein Thomas E. Mann Editors American Enterprise Institute and The Brookings Institution WASHINGTON, D.C. 2000 Available in the United States from the AEI Press, c/o Publisher Resources Inc., 1224 Heil Quaker Blvd., P.O. Box 7001, La Vergne, TN 37086-7001. To order, call 1-800-937-5557. Distributed outside the United States by arrangement with Eurospan, 3 Henrietta Street, London WC2E 8LU, England. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The permanent campaign and its future / Norman J. Ornstein, Thomas E. Mann, editors. p. c. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8447-4133-7 (cloth: alk. paper)—ISBN 0-8447-4134-5 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1. Political campaigns—United States. 2. Democracy—United States. I. Ornstein, Norman J. II. Mann, Thomas E. JK2281.P395 2000 324.7N0973—c21 00-058657 ISBN 0-8447-4133-7 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 0-8447-4134-5 (pbk.: alk. paper) 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 © 2000 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., and the Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of the staff, advisory pan- els, officers, or trustees of AEI or Brookings. American Enterprise Institute 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Printed in the United States of America Contents Preface vii 1 Campaigning and Governing: A Conspectus 1 Hugh Heclo 2 The Press and the Permanent Campaign 38 Stephen Hess 3 Polling to Campaign and to Govern 54 Karlyn Bowman 4 Running Backward: The Congressional Money Chase 75 Anthony Corrado 5 The American Presidency: Surviving and Thriving amidst the Permanent Campaign 108 Kathryn Dunn Tenpas 6 Congress in the Era of the Permanent Campaign 134 David Brady and Morris Fiorina 7 The Never Ending Story: Campaigns without Elections 162 Burdett A. Loomis 8 Preparing to Govern in 2001: Lessons from the Clinton Presidency 185 Charles O. Jones 9 Conclusion: The Permanent Campaign and the Future of American Democracy 219 Norman J. Ornstein and Thomas E. Mann v vi THE PERMANENT CAMPAIGN AND ITS FUTURE Index 235 About the Editors and Contributors 245 Preface The “permanent campaign” has become a prominent feature of American politics since the publication of Sidney Blumenthal’s book with that name two decades ago, or by some accounts since Pat Caddell coined the term in a transition memo to president-elect Jimmy Carter in 1976. For years it was shorthand in the political community for the use of governing as an instrument to build and sustain popular support. Presidents and members of Congress were seen to exploit the resources and opportunities of their offices, with increasing energy and sophistication, to advance their reelection prospects. But this conception of the permanent campaign has proven much too limited to capture the growing importance of campaign strate- gies, tactics, and resources in all aspects of American public life. Candidates for the presidency and Congress now are in a perpetual campaign mode. Political consultants and pollsters occupy promi- nent staff positions with public officials. Fund-raising trumps all competitors in the struggle for the attention and energy of politi- cians and their aides. Interest groups launch sophisticated advertis- ing campaigns to shape important public policy debates. Journalists employ campaign metaphors to frame their coverage of governing. The line between campaigning and governing has all but disap- peared, with campaigning increasingly dominant. This volume aims to make sense of this new meaning of the per- manent campaign, to understand how and why it has evolved, to weigh its consequences for our ability to govern ourselves effec- vii viii THE PERMANENT CAMPAIGN AND ITS FUTURE tively, and to consider whether steps might be taken to ameliorate its more damaging effects. In publishing these essays, we seek to make a substantive contribution to understanding a critically important feature of contemporary American politics. The larger effort of which it is a part, however, the Transition to Governing Project, which is generously funded by the Pew Charitable Trusts, aspires to improve the conditions for governing by shaping the way in which campaigns are waged and covered by the press. By raising questions about governance during the 2000 campaign—about transition planning, agenda setting, dealing with Congress, coping with the permanent campaign, building domestic support for for- eign policy and political reform—the project hopes to plant seeds that might blossom into genuine improvements in the American way of politics and governing. As codirectors of the Transition to Governing Project, we would like to offer special thanks to the Pew Charitable Trusts, whose pres- ident, Rebecca Rimel, has championed efforts to improve the qual- ity of campaigning and governing. Paul Light, former director of public policy programs at Pew and now director of governmental studies at the Brookings Institution, was instrumental in conceiving and launching the project. Michael Delli Carpini, the current direc- tor of public policy programs at Pew, offered his support and wis- dom. Elaine Casey, also with Pew, monitored our progress and shepherded us through day-to-day difficulties. John Fortier, the project administrator, has been absolutely cru- cial to the successful completion of this volume and to the conduct of the larger effort of which it is a part. The presidents of our respec- tive research organizations, Christopher DeMuth of the American Enterprise Institute and Michael Armacost of Brookings, trumpeted the message of our project to the Washington policy community and provided crucial institutional support. Monty Brown, director of the AEI Press, moved the book swiftly through the editing and production process. The views expressed in this volume are those of the editors and authors and should not be ascribed to the organizations listed above PREFACE ix or to the trustees, officers, or other staff members of the American Enterprise Institute or the Brookings Institution. Norman J. Ornstein Resident Scholar American Enterprise Institute Thomas E. Mann Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution The Permanent Campaign and Its Future 1 Campaigning and Governing: A Conspectus Hugh Heclo This chapter addresses two questions in an attempt to provide a background for the studies that follow. Should anyone really care whether such a thing as “the permanent campaign” exists? Does it make any sense to invent yet another term to characterize our pub- lic affairs? First, some very good reasons, indeed, exist to pay attention to the relationship—and the distinction—between campaigning and governing. If campaigning and governing are merging into one indiscriminate mass, we would do well to ask whether that means that something important is happening. The chapter goes on to consider a series of interrelated features of modern American poli- tics. No one of them may be entirely new, but the pieces fit together to produce a new syndrome. No one planned such an emergent pat- tern in the general management of our public affairs, yet it now seems to lie at the heart of the way Americans do politics—or more accurately—the way politics is done to Americans at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Second, to speak of a permanent cam- paign seems as good a way as any other to identify that state of affairs. Prologue to the Endless Campaign The term permanent campaign was first widely publicized early in the Reagan presidency by Sidney Blumenthal, a journalist who went 1 2 THE PERMANENT CAMPAIGN AND ITS FUTURE on to work in the Clinton White House—and then was caught up in the semipermanent campaign to impeach the president. Calling it “the political ideology of our age,” Blumenthal described the per- manent campaign as a combination of image making and strategic calculation that turns governing into a perpetual campaign and “remakes government into an instrument designed to sustain an elected official’s popularity.”1 Others made similar observations, without using that exact term, before and after 1982. As the 1960 election approached, Samuel Grafton wrote in the New York Times about the troubling and grow- ing reliance of politicians on the new public opinion polls. Grafton cited a worrisome curiosity: an “Eastern Senator [who] regularly has the voters in his state quizzed on a list of ten different public issues to find out which they react to most warmly. The Senator then becomes ‘hot’ about the issues he finds produce a temperature in the voters.” Grafton went on to point out the ominous similarity between that kind of so-called leadership and the way television was selecting its shows.2 Simultaneously, Richard E. Neustadt pub- lished his landmark book Presidential Power.3 Although more nuanced than most readers noticed, Neustadt’s study upset political science traditionalists, received widespread press attention for hav- ing John F. Kennedy’s ear, and taught several generations of students the message that “the power of the president is the power to per- suade.” Academic attention to the phenomenon of apparently endless campaigning gathered momentum in 1974 with the publication of David Mayhew’s influential study, Congress: The Electoral Connection. Mayhew argued that the key to Congress lay in understanding con- gressmen’s unremitting drive for reelection.4 In retrospect, it is interesting that Mayhew’s study drew heavy criticism from other congressional experts for interpreting congressional behavior as lit- tle more than a collection of 435 individual permanent campaigns for reelection.
Recommended publications
  • Personal Calendar, 1995-2007
    i Personal Calendar, 1995-2007 by Professor Darrell M. West Dept. of Political Science Brown University Providence, Rhode Island and Vice President of Governance Studies Brookings Institution Washington, DC 2016 ii Table of Contents Preface 1995 ............................................................................................. 4 1996 ............................................................................................ 31 1997 ........................................................................................... 58 1998 ........................................................................................... 83 1999 .......................................................................................... 110 2000 .......................................................................................... 138 2001 .......................................................................................... 160 2002 ........................................................................................ 186 2003 ........................................................................................ 214 2004 ........................................................................................ 238 2005 ........................................................................................ 259 2006 ........................................................................................ 279 2007 ........................................................................................ 300 Index ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
    Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House).
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Voice of America: Soft Power and the Free Flow of Information
    RADIO FREE EUROPE/RADIO LIBERTY AND VOICE OF AMERICA: SOFT POWER AND THE FREE FLOW OF INFORMATION HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JULY 23, 2009 Serial No. 111–24 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 51–255PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 17:26 Sep 08, 2009 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\EU\072309\51255.000 HFA PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOWARD L. BERMAN, California, Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey Samoa DAN BURTON, Indiana DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT WEXLER, Florida DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BILL DELAHUNT, Massachusetts RON PAUL, Texas GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York JEFF FLAKE, Arizona DIANE E. WATSON, California MIKE PENCE, Indiana RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri JOE WILSON, South Carolina ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina MICHAEL E. MCMAHON, New York CONNIE MACK, Florida JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska GENE GREEN, Texas MICHAEL T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Red Thread How Democratic Dominance Gave Way to Republican Advantage in Us House of Representatives Elections, 1964
    THE LONG RED THREAD HOW DEMOCRATIC DOMINANCE GAVE WAY TO REPUBLICAN ADVANTAGE IN U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ELECTIONS, 1964-2018 by Kyle Kondik A thesis submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Baltimore, Maryland September 2019 © 2019 Kyle Kondik All Rights Reserved Abstract This history of U.S. House elections from 1964-2018 examines how Democratic dominance in the House prior to 1994 gave way to a Republican advantage in the years following the GOP takeover. Nationalization, partisan realignment, and the reapportionment and redistricting of House seats all contributed to a House where Republicans do not necessarily always dominate, but in which they have had an edge more often than not. This work explores each House election cycle in the time period covered and also surveys academic and journalistic literature to identify key trends and takeaways from more than a half-century of U.S. House election results in the one person, one vote era. Advisor: Dorothea Wolfson Readers: Douglas Harris, Matt Laslo ii Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………....ii List of Tables……………………………………………………………………………..iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………………..v Introduction: From Dark Blue to Light Red………………………………………………1 Data, Definitions, and Methodology………………………………………………………9 Chapter One: The Partisan Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution in the United States House of Representatives, 1964-1974…………………………...…12 Chapter 2: The Roots of the Republican Revolution:
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H3781
    May 14, 2019 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE H3781 Is it time to recognize Taiwan as an get issued by the Communist Party a proved, churches have been razed and wor- independent country, a thriving democ- good citizen score. But, Mr. Speaker, shippers subjected to detainment, physical in- racy, our eleventh largest trading part- you don’t know what your score is. So terrogation, and thought reform conditioning. ner? when you show up to travel, if your In the west, in Xinjiang Province, the United I want to bring up the South China score is not high enough, then you get Nations has reported the government to be Sea. denied travel. If you go to borrow holding roughly one million Uygurs without Mr. Speaker, how much time do I money or use your banking system, charge. Those who have escaped have testi- have remaining? you are denied your banking system. fied to being repeatedly told that God did not The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gen- Your kids can’t go to the colleges you exist and that they would only be fed after ac- tleman from Florida has 9 minutes re- want them to go to because you are de- knowledging the greatness of communism. maining. nied because you are a bad citizen. Mr. Speaker, I encourage this Congress and Mr. YOHO. Mr. Speaker, I will try to They have extended this and offered our President to take appropriate actions to tighten this up. this to Russia; they have extended this promote religious freedom of religious minori- Mr. Speaker, China, in the South and offered it to Maduro in Venezuela; ties in the People’s Republic of China.
    [Show full text]
  • August Sunday Talk Shows Data
    August Sunday Talk Shows Data August 1, 2010 21 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 5 men and 1 woman Admiral Michael Mullen (M) Mayor Michael Bloomberg (M) Alan Greenspan (M) Gov. Ed Rendell (M) Doris Kearns Goodwin (F) Mark Halperin (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 4 men and 0 women Admiral Michael Mullen (M) Sen. Jon Kyl (M) Richard Haass (M) Thomas Saenz (M) ABC's This Week with Jake Tapper: 4 men and 2 women Sen. Nancy Pelosi (F) Robert Gates (M) George Will (M) Paul Krugman (M) Donna Brazile (F) Ahmed Rashid (M) CNN's State of the Union with Candy Crowley: 4 men and 0 women Sen. Carl Levin (M) Sen. Lindsey Graham (M) Dan Balz (M) Peter Baker (M) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: 4 men and 3 women Sarah Palin (F) Sen. Mitch McConnell (M) Rep. John Boehner (M) Bill Kristol (M) Ceci Connolly (F) Liz Cheney (F) Juan Williams (M) August 8, 2010 20 men and 7 women NBC's Meet the Press with David Gregory: 4 men and 2 women Carol Browner (F) Rep. John Boehner (M) Rep. Mike Pence (M) former Rep. Harold Ford (M) Andrea Mitchell (F) Todd S. Purdum (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Bob Schieffer: 4 men and 1 woman Admiral Thad Allen (M) David Boies (M) Tony Perkins (M) Dan Balz (M) Jan Crawford (F) ABC's This Week with Jake Tapper: 5 men and 1 woman General Ray Odierno (M) Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoconservatives Among Us? Astudy of Former Dissidents' Discourse
    43 L 62 Neoconservatives Among Us? A Study of Former Dissidents’ Discourse* JENI SCHALLER Abstract: Neoconservative political thought has been characterized as “distinctly American”, but could there be fertile ground for its basic tenets in post-communist Europe? This paper takes an initial look at the acceptance of the ideas of American neo- conservative foreign policy among Czech elites who were dissidents under the communist regime. Open-ended, semi-structured interviews with eight former dissidents were con- ducted and then analyzed against a background of some fundamental features of neocon- servative foreign policy. Discourse analysis is the primary method of examination of the texts. Although a coherent discourse among Czech former dissidents cannot be said to ex- ist, certain aspects reminiscent of American neoconservative thought were found. Key words: neoconservatism, Czech dissidents, foreign policy, discourse analysis I. INTRODUCTION Neoconservatism, as a strain of political thought in the United States, has been represented as “distinctly American” and Irving Kristol, often considered the “godfather” of neoconservatism, emphatically states “[t]here is nothing like neoconservatism in Europe” (Kristol 2003: 33). Analyst Jeffrey Gedmin writes that the “environment for neoconservatism as such is an inhospitable one” in Europe, especially Germany (Gedmin 2004: 291). The states of Cen- tral Europe, in contrast to many of the established continental EU members, represent a rather more pro-American stance. With groups of former dissi- dents whose political leanings are in part informed by the American anti- communist, pro-democracy policies of the 1970s and 1980s, could there be a more hospitable environment for neoconservative ideas in a Central Euro- pean state such as the Czech Republic? The Czech dissident community was not as extensive or well-organised as that in Poland or even Hungary, largely due to the post-1968 “normalisation” in Czechoslovakia.
    [Show full text]
  • Cnn Michael Cohen Testimony
    Cnn Michael Cohen Testimony Heaving and returning Kermit gravitate almost tegularly, though Arvind crackled his herbicides query. Antin often redeploy symptomatically when credulous Sully drives mopingly and crushes her candelabras. Prescript Delmar misaims ethologically. Due to subpoena cohen michael cohen testimony. Speaking on wednesday and donald trump inflated his son of the russian government had retaliated against him was also lied for? Michael cohen arranged for himself as do, at any money being traced back hard on our country. What cohen suggests in a separate investigation he met with trump from trump or dodge questions about a passport stamp on that process had complained that. United states cohen on rebroadcast. And cnn michael cohen testimony that trump. Cohen is willing to ongoing threats against him that cohen named weisselberg among networks reporting about it may disclose that could learn more groundwork for? It through a big loans, suggested that per early nielsen national correspondent for? Sign up for his business with russia investigation by cohen had an opportunity. In advance knowledge of this story noted, michael cohen testimony are coming into new poll. We hope so. White house and cohen testimony. Cohen did they responded that it was in his testimony. Chat with kim in hanoi, finished no margin of how it is an affair, said he later this conversation with cohen did know for? In this was actually moved past abc in ga event if if ads, york post based in a user state of congress would be amazed. Certain specific knowledge of a website that he was not directly tell me to cnn michael cohen testimony topped the cnn news network, which is already been.
    [Show full text]
  • Baker, James A.: Files Folder Title: Political Affairs January 1984-July 1984 (3) Box: 9
    Ronald Reagan Presidential Library Digital Library Collections This is a PDF of a folder from our textual collections. Collection: Baker, James A.: Files Folder Title: Political Affairs January 1984-July 1984 (3) Box: 9 To see more digitized collections visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/archives/digital-library To see all Ronald Reagan Presidential Library inventories visit: https://reaganlibrary.gov/document-collection Contact a reference archivist at: [email protected] Citation Guidelines: https://reaganlibrary.gov/citing National Archives Catalogue: https://catalog.archives.gov/ REAGAN-00SH'84 The President's Authorized Campaign Committee M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Jim Baker, Mike Deaver, Dick Darman, Margaret Tutwiler, Mike McManus THROUGH: Ed Rollins FROM: Doug Watts DATE: June 6, 1984 RE: Television Advertising Recently, the idea was advanced that Reagan-Bush '84 should develop negative television advertising - utilizing derisive issue and personality oriented statements made by Democratic presidential candidates about one another - to be broadcast during the periods ten days before and after the Democratic Convention {July 16-20). The thought apparently was to highlight within an issue framework, not only the chaotic and contentious democratic contest, but to point out the insipid, petty and self-serving manner in which the debate has been conducted. The attack themes presumably were to be directed primarily at Mondale and Hart before the convention and at the nominee following the convention. The above described approach was discussed Thursday and Friday {5/31/84 & 6/1/84) during a meeting with myself, Ed Rollins, Lee Atwater and Jim Lake, and then myself and the Tuesday Team.
    [Show full text]
  • George H.W. Bush, "Speech at Penn State University" (23 September 1992)
    Voices of Democracy 2 (2007): 126‐151 Hogan & Mehltretter 126 GEORGE H.W. BUSH, "SPEECH AT PENN STATE UNIVERSITY" (23 SEPTEMBER 1992) J. Michael Hogan and Sara Ann Mehltretter Pennsylvania State University Abstract: During the 1992 presidential campaign, President George H. W. Bush lost a lead in the polls and subsequently the presidency to Bill Clinton. This study helps to account for that loss by illuminating weaknesses in his campaign stump speech. Bush's speech at Penn State University reflected his difficulties in distinguishing himself from his challenger and articulating a vision for his second term. The essay also illustrates larger controversies over politics and free speech on campus. Key Words: 1992 presidential election, George H. W. Bush, Bill Clinton, campaign speeches, free speech on campus, Penn State University On September 23, 1992, President George H.W. Bush brought his reelection campaign to the University Park campus of the Pennsylvania State University. Speaking on the steps of Old Main to a cheering crowd of supporters, Bush said little new in the speech. Yet it still proved controversial, not so much because of what Bush said, but because of the way the event was staged. Sparking controversy over the distribution of tickets and the treatment of protestors at the event, Bush's appearance dramatized the difficulties of staging campaign events at colleges and universities. It also raised larger issues about politics and free speech on campus. Bush's speech at Penn State was carefully prepared and vetted by his speech‐ writing staff and White House advisers. Yet despite all the effort that went into the speech, it was vague, uninspired, and unresponsive to criticisms of his administration, reflecting the larger problems with Bush's faltering campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillary Clinton's Campaign Was Undone by a Clash of Personalities
    64 Hillary Clinton’s campaign was undone by a clash of personalities more toxic than anyone imagined. E-mails and memos— published here for the first time—reveal the backstabbing and conflicting strategies that produced an epic meltdown. BY JOSHUA GREEN The Front-Runner’s Fall or all that has been written and said about Hillary Clin- e-mail feuds was handed over. (See for yourself: much of it is ton’s epic collapse in the Democratic primaries, one posted online at www.theatlantic.com/clinton.) Fissue still nags. Everybody knows what happened. But Two things struck me right away. The first was that, outward we still don’t have a clear picture of how it happened, or why. appearances notwithstanding, the campaign prepared a clear The after-battle assessments in the major newspapers and strategy and did considerable planning. It sweated the large newsweeklies generally agreed on the big picture: the cam- themes (Clinton’s late-in-the-game emergence as a blue-collar paign was not prepared for a lengthy fight; it had an insuf- champion had been the idea all along) and the small details ficient delegate operation; it squandered vast sums of money; (campaign staffers in Portland, Oregon, kept tabs on Monica and the candidate herself evinced a paralyzing schizophrenia— Lewinsky, who lived there, to avoid any surprise encounters). one day a shots-’n’-beers brawler, the next a Hallmark Channel The second was the thought: Wow, it was even worse than I’d mom. Through it all, her staff feuded and bickered, while her imagined! The anger and toxic obsessions overwhelmed even husband distracted.
    [Show full text]