DOCSLIB.ORG

Hillary Clinton's Campaign Was Undone by a Clash of Personalities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hillary Clinton's Campaign Was Undone by a Clash of Personalities 64 Hillary Clinton’s campaign was undone by a clash of personalities more toxic than anyone imagined. E-mails and memos— published here for the first time—reveal the backstabbing and conflicting strategies that produced an epic meltdown. BY JOSHUA GREEN The Front-Runner’s Fall or all that has been written and said about Hillary Clin- e-mail feuds was handed over. (See for yourself: much of it is ton’s epic collapse in the Democratic primaries, one posted online at www.theatlantic.com/clinton.) Fissue still nags. Everybody knows what happened. But Two things struck me right away. The first was that, outward we still don’t have a clear picture of how it happened, or why. appearances notwithstanding, the campaign prepared a clear The after-battle assessments in the major newspapers and strategy and did considerable planning. It sweated the large newsweeklies generally agreed on the big picture: the cam- themes (Clinton’s late-in-the-game emergence as a blue-collar paign was not prepared for a lengthy fight; it had an insuf- champion had been the idea all along) and the small details ficient delegate operation; it squandered vast sums of money; (campaign staffers in Portland, Oregon, kept tabs on Monica and the candidate herself evinced a paralyzing schizophrenia— Lewinsky, who lived there, to avoid any surprise encounters). one day a shots-’n’-beers brawler, the next a Hallmark Channel The second was the thought: Wow, it was even worse than I’d mom. Through it all, her staff feuded and bickered, while her imagined! The anger and toxic obsessions overwhelmed even husband distracted. But as a journalistic exercise, the “cam- the most reserved Beltway wise men. Surprisingly, Clinton her- paign obit” is inherently flawed, reflecting the viewpoints of self, when pressed, was her own shrewdest strategist, a role that those closest to the press rather than empirical truth. had never been her strong suit in the White House. But her How did things look on the inside, as they unraveled? advisers couldn’t execute strategy; they routinely attacked and To find out, I approached a number of current and former undermined each other, and Clinton never forced a resolution. Clinton staffers and outside consultants and asked them to Major decisions would be put off for weeks until suddenly she share memos, e-mails, meeting minutes, diaries—anything would erupt, driving her staff to panic and misfire. that would offer a contemporaneous account. The result dem- Above all, this irony emerges: Clinton ran on the basis of onstrates that paranoid dysfunction breeds the impulse to managerial competence—on her capacity, as she liked to put hoard. Everything from major strategic plans to bitchy staff it, to “do the job from Day One.” In fact, she never behaved like 65 a chief executive, and her own staff proved to be her Achilles’ campaign, to persuade Iowans to reconsider her? Or should heel. What is clear from the internal documents is that Clin- she run a negative campaign that would accuse her opponents ton’s loss derived not from any specific decision she made but of being untrustworthy and under-qualified? Clinton’s top rather from the preponderance of the many she did not make. advisers never agreed on the answer. Over the course of the Her hesitancy and habit of avoiding hard choices exacted a campaign, they split into competing factions that drifted in price that eventually sank her chances at the presidency. What and out of Clinton’s favor but always seemed to work at cross follows is the inside account of how the campaign for the seem- purposes. And Clinton herself could never quite decide who ingly unstoppable Democratic nominee came into being, and was right. then came apart. MARCH 2007: THE STRATEGY 2003–2006: LAYING THE GROUNDWorK enn had won the trust of both Clintons by guiding Bill s long ago as 2003, the Clintons’ pollster, Mark Penn, was Clinton to reelection in 1996 and through the impeach- quietly measuring Hillary’s presidential appeal, with an Pment saga that followed. But his poll-tested centrism A eye toward the 2004 election. Polling suggested that her and brusque manner aroused suspicion and contempt among prospects were “reasonably favorable,” but Clinton herself never many of their advisers. In the White House and during Hil- seriously considered running. Instead, over the next three years, lary’s Senate races, Penn often prevailed in internal disputes a handful of her advisers met periodically to prepare for 2008. by brandishing his own poll numbers (which his opponents They believed the biggest threat was John Edwards. distrusted) and pointing out that he had delivered a Clinton Decisions made before her 2006 reelection to the Sen- to the White House once before. ate were to have important conse- quences downstream. Perhaps the biggest was Clinton’s choosing to forgo the tradition of visiting early states like Iowa and New Hampshire. Even if she was presumed to be the heavy favorite, Clinton needed to win Iowa to maintain the impression of invincibility that she believed was her greatest advantage. And yet Iowa was a vulnerability. Both husband and wife lacked ties there: Bill Clin- ton had skipped the 1992 caucuses because Iowa’s Senator Tom Harkin was running; in 1996, Clinton had run unopposed. With her Senate race looming, she feared a backlash if she signaled her presidential intentions. If New Yorkers thought her presumptuous, they could punish her at the polls and weaken her national standing. A collective decision was made not to discuss a presidential run until she had won reelection, leaving the early pursuit of Iowa to John Edwards and Barack Obama. In light of this history, he got off to an inauspicious start The effect of these choices in Iowa became jarringly clear when Clinton entered the race in January 2007, by demand- when Penn conducted a poll just after Clinton’s Senate reelec- ing the title “chief strategist” (previously he had been one of tion that showed her running a very distant third, barely ahead several “senior advisers”) and presenting each of his senior col- of the state’s governor, Tom Vilsack. The poll produced a curi- leagues with a silver bowl inscribed with the words of Horace ous revelation: Iowans rated Clinton at the top of the field on Mann: “Be ashamed to die until you have won some victory questions of leadership, strength, and experience—but most for humanity.” did not plan to vote for her, because they didn’t like her. This Penn had clear ideas about how to engineer a win for Clin- presented a basic conundrum: Should Clinton run a positive ton, in Iowa and beyond. Obama had eclipsed Edwards right 68 THE FRONT-RUNNER’S FALL THE ATLANTIC SEPTEMBER 2008 out of the gate and was experiencing the full measure of “next b. Connect on the problems of the global economy, JFK” hype. In a memo dated March 19, 2007, Penn laid out economics an “Overall Strategy for Winning” built upon a coalition of c. Foreign policy expert voters he called “Invisible Americans,” a sort of reprise of Bill d. Unions Clinton’s “forgotten middle class”: Contest the black vote at every opportunity. Keep him pinned down there. As this race unfolds, the winning coalition for us is clearer Organize on college campuses. We may not be number 1 and clearer. There are three demographic variables that there, but we have a lot of fans—more than enough to explain almost all of the voters in the primary—gender, sustain an organization in every college. party, and income. Race is a factor as well, but we are fighting hard to neutralize it. Penn’s prescription is notable because it is the rare instance We are the candidate of people with needs. of a Clinton campaign goal that panned out—the coalition We win women, lower classes, and Democrats (about she ended up winning a year later is the one described here. 3 to 1 in our favor). Penn’s memo is also notable for its tone: it reinforces rather Obama wins men, upper class, and independents than confronts the Clintons’ biases. “The biggest problem we (about 2 to 1 in his favor). have is the troika that has been set up to tear Hillary down,” Edwards draws from these groups as well. he wrote. Our winning strategy builds from a base of women, builds on top of that a lower and middle class constitu- It is a vast right and left wing conspiracy. Listening to Brit ency, and seeks to minimize his advantages with the high Hume say that Obama is surging while Hillary failed to do class democrats. X is almost comical and certainly transparent. The right If we double perform with WOMEN, LOWER AND knows Obama is unelectable except perhaps against Attila MIDDLE CLASS VOTERS, then we have about 55% of the Hun, and a third party would come in then anyway. the voters. The reason the Invisible Americans is so powerful is By contrast, top consultants like Karl Rove usually aim that it speaks to exactly how you can be a champion for to temper their clients’ biases with a cold dose of realism. I those in needs [sic]. He may be the JFK in the race, but suspect the damaging persecution complex that both Clin- you are the Bobby. tons displayed drew much of its sustenance from memos like this one. Clinton was already under attack for an attitude of Penn also left no doubt about where he stood on the question “inevitability”—the charge being that she imperiously viewed of a positive versus negative strategy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hillary Clinton Is Discharged from Hospital After Blood Clot - the New
    Hillary Clinton Is Discharged From Hospital After Blood Clot - The New... http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/us/politics/hillary-clinton-is-discha... http://nyti.ms/WlP7Dz POLITICS By DENISE GRADY and MARK LANDLER JAN. 2, 2013 Hillary Rodham Clinton, whose globe-trotting tour as secretary of state was abruptly halted last month by a series of health problems, was discharged from a New York hospital on Wednesday evening after several days of treatment for a blood clot in a vein in her head. The news of her release was the first welcome sign in a troubling month that grounded Mrs. Clinton — preventing her from answering questions in Congress about the State Department’s handling of the lethal attack on an American mission in Libya or being present when President Obama announced Senator John Kerry as his choice for her successor when she steps down as secretary of state. “Her medical team advised her that she is making good progress on all fronts, and they are confident she will make a full recovery,” Philippe Reines, a senior adviser to Mrs. Clinton, said in a statement. Mrs. Clinton, 65, was admitted to NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia hospital on Sunday after a scan discovered the blood clot. The scan was part of her follow-up care for a concussion she sustained more than two weeks earlier, when she fainted and fell, striking her head. According to the State Department, the fainting was caused by dehydration, brought on by a stomach virus. The concussion was diagnosed on Dec. 1 of 4 8/9/2016 11:01 PM Hillary Clinton Is Discharged From Hospital After Blood Clot - The New..
    [Show full text]
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7
    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    Case 1:13-cv-00825-ABJ Document 73 Filed 10/15/15 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GILBERTE JILL KELLEY, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 13-cv-825 (ABJ) ) THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) INVESTIGATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) DEFENDANT FBI’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendant the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI” or “the Bureau”), by and through undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 30(d)(3) and 26(c), respectfully moves the Court for a protective order: (a) Limiting the September 2, 2015, deposition of FBI Supervisory Special Agent Adam Malone (to the extent the deposition remains open and continued) on the Rule 30(d)(3) ground that certain portions of the deposition were “conducted in bad faith or in a manner that unreasonably annoys, embarrasses, or oppresses” the witness or the FBI pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(3); and (b) Restricting, pursuant to Rule 26(c), any further FBI-related discovery to the discovery of (1) facts sufficient to show disclosure(s) to the media by one or more FBI employees in a manner violating the Privacy Act, and (2) facts relating to the governments’ defenses to the plaintiffs’ remaining claims. Co-defendant the Department of Defense (“DoD”) concurs with the motion. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(m), counsel for defendants have met and conferred with counsel for plaintiffs. Plaintiffs oppose this motion. For the reasons stated in the accompanying Statement of Points and Authorities and the FBI’s proposed Under Seal Supplement, the Court should grant the instant motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy and Politics by the Numbers;Аfor the President
    5/12/2017 Policy and Politics by the Numbers; For the President, Polls Became a Defining Force in His Administration ­ washingtonpost.com ­ search nation, world… Policy and Politics by the Numbers; For the President, Polls Became a Defining Force in His Administration [FINAL Edition] The Washington Post ­ Washington, D.C. Subjects: Series & special reports; Public opinion surveys; Policy making; Presidency Author: Harris, John F Date: Dec 31, 2000 Start Page: A.01 Section: A SECTION One night a week, a select group of White House aides and Cabinet members would file into the Yellow Oval Room in the White House residence. And Bill Clinton, the most polished and talkative politician of his era, for once would let someone else do the talking: a disheveled man who even friends say was ill at ease except when the conversation turned to numbers. The man was Clinton's pollster. The weekly residence meeting was the place where this president got his fix of the data that drove a presidency. As Clinton prepares to leave office 20 days from now, even his sharpest critics bow to his mastery of politics. This was a president who understood his times and became the dominant voice of them, who faced every conceivable adversity yet managed still to survive and prosper. What is less understood is that Clinton's political gifts were more than the magic of personality. They were a set of precise techniques that relied on constant gauging of public opinion, and constant responses to it in ways large and small. So Clinton's legacy is in many ways a story about polls.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Italy an “Atlantic” Country?
    Is Italy an “Atlantic” Country? Marco Mariano IS ITALY AN “ATLANTIC” COUNTRY?* [Italians] have always flourished under a strong hand, whether Caesar’s or Hildebrand’s, Cavour’s or Crispi’s. That is because they are not a people like ourselves or the English or the Germans, loving order and regulation and government for their own sake....When his critics accuse [Mussolini] of unconstitutionality they only recommend him the more to a highly civilized but naturally lawless people. (Anne O’ Hare McCormick, New York Times Magazine, July 22, 1923) In this paper I will try to outline the emergence of the idea of Atlantic Community (from now on AC) during and in the aftermath of World War II and the peculiar, controversial place of Italy in the AC framework. Both among American policymakers and in public discourse, especially in the press, AC came to define a transatlantic space including basically North American and Western European countries, which supposedly shared political and economic principles and institutions (liberal democracy, individual rights and the rule of law, free market and free trade), cultural traditions (Christianity and, more generally, “Western civilization”) and, consequently, national interests. While the preexisting idea of Western civilization was defined mainly in cultural- historical terms and did not imply any institutional obligation, now the impeding threat of the cold war and the confrontation with the Communist block demanded the commitment to be part of a “community” with shared beliefs and needs, in which every single member is responsible for the safety and prosperity of all the other members. The obvious political counterpart of such a discourse on Euro-American relations was the birth of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) on April 4, 1949.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Guilty As Sin G U I LTY AS SIN
    Guilty as Sin G U I LTY AS SIN UNCOVERING NEW EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION AND HOW HILLARY CLINTON AND THE DEMOCRATS DERAILED THE FBI INVESTIGATION EDWARD KLEIN Copyright © 2016 by Edward Klein All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without permission in writing from the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, website, or broadcast. Regnery® is a registered trademark of Salem Communications Holding Corporation First e-book edition 2016: ISBN 978-1-62157-642-6 Originally published in hardcover, 2016: ISBN 978-1-62157-641-9 Cataloging-in-Publication data on file with the Library of Congress Published in the United States by Regnery Publishing A Division of Salem Media Group 300 New Jersey Ave NW Washington, DC 20001 www.Regnery.com Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Books are available in quantity for promotional or premium use. For information on discounts and terms, please visit our website: www. Regnery.com. Distributed to the trade by Perseus Distribution 250 West 57th Street New York, NY 10107 ALSO BY EDWARD KLEIN NONFICTION All Too Human: The Love Story of Jack and Jackie Kennedy Just Jackie: Her Private Years The Kennedy Curse: Why Tragedy Has Haunted America’s First Family for 150 Years Farewell, Jackie: A Portrait of Her Final Days The Truth about Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She’ll Go to Become President Katie: The Real Story Ted Kennedy: The Dream That Never Died The Amateur: Barack Obama in the White House Blood Feud: The Clintons vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Marketing Forward Looking Information & Other Information
    TRANSFORMING MARKETING FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION & OTHER INFORMATION Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements This communication may contain certain forward-looking statements (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the U.S. Exchange Act and the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, and “forward-looking information” under applicable Canadian securities laws. Statements in this document that are not historical facts, including statements about MDC’s or Stagwell’s beliefs and expectations and recent business and economic trends, constitute forward-looking statements. Words such as “estimate,” “project,” “target,” “predict,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “potential,” “create,” “intend,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “may,” “foresee,” “plan,” “will,” “guidance,” “look,” “outlook,” “future,” “assume,” “forecast,” “focus,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other variations thereof and terms of similar substance used in connection with any discussion of current plans, estimates and projections are subject to change based on a number of factors, including those outlined in this section. Such forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, statements related to: future financial performance and the future prospects of the respective businesses and operations of MDC, Stagwell and the combined company; information concerning the proposed business combination
    [Show full text]
  • United by the Global COVID-19 Pandemic: Divided by Our Values and Viral Identities ✉ Mimi E
    COMMENT https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00679-5 OPEN United by the global COVID-19 pandemic: divided by our values and viral identities ✉ Mimi E. Lam 1 The rapidly evolving landscape of the global COVID-19 pandemic necessitates urgent scientific advances and adaptive behavioural and policy responses to contain viral transmission, reduce impacts on public health, and minimise soci- 1234567890():,; etal disruption. Epidemiological models of SARS-CoV-2 transmission are heavily influencing policy responses, forecasting viral infection, transmission, and death rates under simplified representations of human behaviour. They either assume that all members of a population or demographic group behave identically or design individual behavioural rules based on demographic and mobility data. In pluralistic societies, however, individual behavioural responses vary with per- sonal values, situational contexts, and social group identities, affecting policy compliance and viral transmission. Here, I identify and explore the impacts of salient viral identities or “COVID-19 personality types” that are emerging and fluidly coalescing with each other and existing social and political identities. The resultant heightened inter-group differentiation explains the politicisation of the pandemic and rampant racism, discrimination, and conflict observed now and with epidemics historically. Recognising salient COVID-19 behavioural identities can improve scientific forecasting of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and the impact of containment measures, as well as tailor nuanced policy interventions and communications to enhance individual coping and compliance. As governments contemplate easing social-distancing restrictions, the science-society-policy nexus needs fortification through public participation, structured deliberation, and evidence-informed decision-making of policy options to negotiate the complex value trade-offs among public health, the market economy, and civil liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • For Internal Discussion Only
    EMBARGOED UNTIL TUESDAY, JUNE 2 EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM JUNE 2009 EMBARGOED UNTIL TUESDAY, JUNE 2 THE ECONOMIC CASE FOR HEALTH CARE REFORM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) has undertaken a comprehensive analysis of the economic impacts of health care reform. The report provides an overview of current economic impacts of health care in the United States and a forecast of where we are headed in the absence of reform; an analysis of inefficiencies and market failures in the current health care system; a discussion of the key components of health care reform; and an analysis of the economic effects of slowing health care cost growth and expanding coverage. The findings in the report point to large economic impacts of genuine health care reform: We estimate that slowing the annual growth rate of health care costs by 1.5 percentage points would increase real gross domestic product (GDP), relative to the no-reform baseline, by over 2 percent in 2020 and nearly 8 percent in 2030. For a typical family of four, this implies that income in 2020 would be approximately $2,600 higher than it would have been without reform (in 2009 dollars), and that in 2030 it would be almost $10,000 higher. Under more conservative estimates of the reduction in the growth rate of health care costs, the income gains are smaller, but still substantial. Slowing the growth rate of health care costs will prevent disastrous increases in the Federal budget deficit.
    [Show full text]
  • |||GET||| Hard Choices 1St Edition
    HARD CHOICES 1ST EDITION DOWNLOAD FREE Hillary Rodham Clinton | 9781476751443 | | | | | Hard Choices – A Memoir Estimated between Tue. Listed in category:. Item added to your basket View basket. The first was in early May Hard Choices 1st edition, when Vogue published an excerpt in celebration of Mother's Day that was about and dedicated to Clinton's mother Dorothy Rodhamwho had died during Clinton's time as secretary. Illustrated with color photographs. This amount is subject to change until you make payment. Hard Cover. Sell now - Have one to sell? Please note the delivery estimate is greater than 7 business Hard Choices 1st edition. Email Address. Some minor shelf wear to dust jacket edges, otherwise very good. Everything I have ever bought from you has been quality. HC Book. Pictorial dust jacket is preserved Hard Choices 1st edition a Brodart jacket. It is housed in a deluxe leather collector's box. Testimonials You guys have great products and communication. Create a Want Tell us what you're looking for and once a match is found, we'll inform you by e-mail. People who viewed this item also viewed. Email to friends Share on Facebook - opens in a new window or tab Share on Twitter - opens in a new window or tab Share on Pinterest - opens in a new window or tab Add to Watchlist. Create a Want BookSleuth Can't remember the title or the author of a book? Clinton also delves into some personal aspects of her life and career, including getting past any hard feelings towards Obama from her presidential campaignevents in her family including her daughter Chelsea Clinton 's wedding, and glimpses of personal interaction with citizens of other countries during her travels as secretary.
    [Show full text]