DOCSLIB.ORG

Who Decides a State's Energy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Who Decides a State's Energy WHO DECIDES A STATE’S ENERGY MIX THURSDAY, APRIL 23, 2020 3 PM ET / 2 PM CT / 1 PM MT / NOON PT 2020 SPRING WEBINAR SERIES Hosted by NCSL’s Natural Resources and Infrastructure Committee Who Decides a State’s Energy Mix? New WOTUS Rule & States Response to Jurisdictional Changes Solar on Agricultural Lands – Preserving Pollinator Habitat and Soil Health State Legislative Trends: Traffic Safety What’s Exceptional? State Efforts to Meet Clean Air Standards For more information on the webinars and how to register, visit NCSL’s NRI webpage SPEAKERS Romany Webb Jeff Dennis Chairman Jason Sabin Center, Advanced Energy Stanek Columbia Law Economy Maryland Public School Service Commission Who Decides a State’s Energy Mix? NCSL Natural Resources and Infrastructure Committee Webinar – April 2020 Romany Webb Associate Research Scholar, Columbia Law School Senior Fellow, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Federal Regulation of Electricity Section 201, Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. § 824) FERC has exclusive jurisdiction over: • “the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce” and • “the sale of electric energy at wholesale in interstate commerce” – wholesale sales = sales for resale – sales in interstate commerce = sales where electricity is transmitted via an interstate grid RTOs and ISOs Source: FERC PJM Interconnection, LLC • Profit-neutral corp., regulated by FERC • Manages a regional grid, comprising >1,300 generators and > 84,000 miles of transmission, and serving 65 million customers • Operates wholesale power markets, including energy markets and a capacity market (Source: PJM) Wholesale Power Markets Source: ISO New England (2020) Limits on Federal Authority FERC “shall not have jurisdiction . over facilities used for the generation of electric energy or over facilities used in local distribution or [intrastate] transmission” - Section 201, Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. § 824) States are authorized to “regulate local distribution plus the facilities used to generate power.” States may exercise that authority “even when their laws incidentally affect areas within FERC's domain” - EPSA v. Star, 904 F.3d 518 (7th Cir. 2018) State Policies Affecting Generation Source: S&P Global (Mar. 2020) Response to State Policies March April June October December 2016 2018 2018 2018 2019 • Calpine • PJM • FERC finds • PJM • FERC Corp. files proposes PJM’s submits directs PJM complaint market existing revised to apply with FERC reforms to tariff unjust proposal, MOPR to re: price address & unreas- involving all new & suppressive impact onable, expansion existing impact of state rejects of the state- state subsidies proposed MOPR, subsidized subsidies reforms coupled resources with a (with Resource limited Carve-Out exceptions) FERC’s View of State Policies The integrity of PJM’s capacity market is “untenably threatened out-of-market payments provided or required by certain states for the purpose of supporting the entry or continued operation of preferred generation resources that may not otherwise be able to succeed in a competitive market. An expanded MOPR with few or no exceptions, should protect PJM’s capacity market from the price- suppressive effects of” state policies - FERC Order (June 2018) The Minimum Offer Price Rule Source: Sierra Club (Aug. 2019) Covered Resources • All new and existing resources that receive, or are eligible to receive, state subsidies • State subsidies include out-of-market payments provided or required by states that “could have the effect of allowing a resource to clear in any PJM capacity auction” • No showing that subsidy “actually allows a resource to uneconomically enter or remain in market” • No materiality thresholds, e.g., for size of resource or state subsidy Exemptions • Existing resource exemptions – existing renewable resources that receive payments through state RPS programs – existing demand response, energy efficiency, and capacity storage resources – existing self-supply resources • Competitive exemption – certain new and existing resources that agree to forego state subsidies • Unit-Specific exemption – new and existing resources that can justify below- MOPR prices Contact Information: [email protected] (415) 702-7902 Important Links: www.climate.law.columbia.edu www.climatecasechart.com blogs.law.columbia.edu/climatechange/ twitter.com/columbiaclimate www.facebook.com/ColumbiaClimateLaw WHO DECIDES A STATE’S ENERGY MIX? The Impact of FERC’s “Broad MOPR” Rule Jeff Dennis Managing Director and General Counsel Advanced Energy Economy @EnergyLawJeff 17 About Advanced Energy Economy • AEE represents more than 100 companies and organizations that span the advanced energy industry and its value chains. • Technologies represented include energy efficiency, demand response, solar photovoltaics, solar thermal electric, wind, energy storage, electric vehicles, advanced metering infrastructure, transmission and distribution efficiency, fuel cells, hydro power, advanced nuclear power, combined heat and power, and enabling software. • Used together, these technologies and services will create and maintain a higher- performing energy system—one that is reliable and resilient, diverse, cost- effective, and clean—while also improving the availability and quality of customer- facing services. 18 18 Key Takeaways • How FERC’s Broad MOPR, as PJM proposes to implement it, will impact advanced energy resources supported by state policies • The impact of MOPR on the energy mix, customers, and clean energy policies in the PJM region • Considering the MOPR in context 19 19 The Impact of Broad MOPR on Advanced Energy Resources in PJM 20 Over 89 GW of advanced energy resources could be impacted by the Broad MOPR ruling MW of Capacity • Over 89 GW of solar and wind generation Exposed to MOPR Solar under development in the PJM Wind interconnection queue are potentially exposed to ruling MI 635 • This is comprised of over 60.6 GW of solar and 28.6 GW of wind interconnection requests PA 7,726 OH NJ 913 8,699 • Many of these projects have invested significant capital IL IN 635 4,785 6,097 11,717 into development and may have executed or be negotiating 6,471 2,124 2,361 MD 1,358 commercial arrangements that rely on capacity revenues WV 674 VA DE 367 431 KY 270 14,124 • New demand response, energy efficiency, 3,135 5,220 energy storage, and other impacted advanced NC energy resources add to this amount 3,811 Note: Many areas of MI, KY, IN, and NC are not within PJM • Every state could be impacted 21 Compiled by Apex Clean Energy in Feb. 2020 21 How do offer floors impact the ability of a resource to “clear” a centralized capacity market? Hypothetical MOPR Floor Price: $400 / MW-day Uneconomic Offer Historical Clearing Price: $80 to $140 / MW-day $/MW Resource Offers – New resources: price floor based on the “Net Cost of New Entry” (muct higher than recent clearing prices for most new clean technologies, sometimes 2-5 times higher) – Existing resources: price floor based on “Net Avoidable Cost Rate” (much lower going forward cost), unless exempted 22 Advanced energy resources provide valuable capacity to the power system • Wind and solar perform well in meeting peak loads – solar generates on peak during the summer, wind generates consistently in the evenings and early mornings in the winter • Demand response and energy efficiency help meet capacity needs by providing reliable demand reductions at peak times • Capacity revenues are an important part of the equation when building a new wind or solar project, and help encourage more demand response and energy efficiency, whether or not they are supported by state policies; without those revenues, prices to consumers can go up – Developers pass on capacity revenues to their customers – Without capacity revenues, power purchase agreement prices may increase from 9% to 25% – These price increases are in addition to the costs of other, redundant capacity resources procured in 23 their place 23 “Default” MOPR Floor Prices in PJM’s compliance filing • PJM developed a set of standard floor prices for various technology types in compliance with FERC’s order – These floor prices apply to new resources – Supposed to reflect a “competitive offer” from a new resource – FERC required PJM to use a methodology based largely on typical economics of natural gas plants • With historic capacity market clearing prices of $80 to $200/MW-day, most advanced energy resources at risk – Only Solar PV (Tracking) and Natural Gas CC in range Chart courtesy of Gabel Associates 24 www.gabelassociates.com 24 The importance of plant-specific MOPR Floor Prices • FERC required PJM to allow individual resources to develop a “unit-specific” floor price • Resource owner must provide evidence to PJM to validate its calculation – Evidence and inputs are subject to review by PJM and the Independent Market Monitor • PJM’s compliance filing allows resource owners to use a methodology more appropriate to their technology type – In other words, the owner of a solar plant can use assumptions more appropriate to solar technology and its project, rather than be forced into a methodology developed for conventional resources • This process helps to alleviate some of the near-term impacts of the Broad MOPR on state-supported resources – Concern that the process could become administratively burdensome 25 – Pending at FERC 25 How Could Broad MOPR Impact the Energy Mix, Consumer Costs, and State Policies in the PJM Region? 26 Impacts of Broad MOPR on the resource mix, consumer costs, and state policies • If
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Energy in the 21St Century: a Primer
    U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46723 SUMMARY R46723 U.S. Energy in the 21st Century: A Primer March 16, 2021 Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S. energy system has changed tremendously. Technological advances in energy production have driven changes in energy consumption, and Melissa N. Diaz, the United States has moved from being a net importer of most forms of energy to a declining Coordinator importer—and a net exporter in 2019. The United States remains the second largest producer and Analyst in Energy Policy consumer of energy in the world, behind China. Overall energy consumption in the United States has held relatively steady since 2000, while the mix of energy sources has changed. Between 2000 and 2019, consumption of natural gas and renewable energy increased, while oil and nuclear power were relatively flat and coal decreased. In the same period, production of oil, natural gas, and renewables increased, while nuclear power was relatively flat and coal decreased. Overall energy production increased by 42% over the same period. Increases in the production of oil and natural gas are due in part to technological improvements in hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling that have facilitated access to resources in unconventional formations (e.g., shale). U.S. oil production (including natural gas liquids and crude oil) and natural gas production hit record highs in 2019. The United States is the largest producer of natural gas, a net exporter, and the largest consumer. Oil, natural gas, and other liquid fuels depend on a network of over three million miles of pipeline infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Report: Energiewende – Mission-Oriented R&I Policies
    Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report Energiewende Hanna Kuittinen, Daniela Velte January 2018 Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate A – Policy Development and coordination Unit A6 – Open Data Policy and Science Cloud Contact Arnold Weiszenbacher E-mail [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Manuscript completed in January 2018. This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2018 PDF ISBN 978-92-79-80159-4 doi: 10.2777/835267 KI-01-18-150-EN-N © European Union, 2018. Reuse is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. The reuse policy of European Commission documents is regulated by Decision 2011/833/EU (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EU copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders EUROPEAN COMMISSION Mission-oriented R&I policies: In-depth case studies Case Study Report: Energiewende Hanna Kuittinen Daniela Velte 2018 Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Table of Contents 1 Summary of the case study ................................................................................... 3 2 Context and objectives of the initiative ................................................................... 5 2.1 Origins of initiative and the main contextual factors ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Energy Mix and the Need for Comprehensive Viewpoints
    IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved The Best Energy Mix and the Need for Comprehensive Viewpoints Wednesday, November 16, 2011 Masakazu Toyoda The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved Contents 1. The Best Energy Mix from Comprehensive Viewpoints 2. Overall, There Is No Perfect Energy Option 3. Short- to Mid-Term Challenges to Achieving the Best Energy Mix 4. Mid- to Long-Term Challenges to Achieving the Best Energy Mix Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. 2 IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved 1. The Best Energy Mix from Comprehensive Viewpoints 1. When reviewing the energy mix, we must solve simultaneous equations with many variables. This requires objective and quantitative analyses. 2. The following variables are important: 1) S (safety) 2) Three Es (i) Energy security (ii) Economic efficiency (particularly in terms of cost) (iii) The environment (compatibility with mitigating global warming) 3) M (impacts on the macro economy) Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited. 3 IEEJ: April 2013 All Right Reserved 1. The Best Energy Mix from Comprehensive Viewpoints 1) S (safety) ● Safety is a prerequisite for energy policies and the activities of the energy industry itself. ● Safety is a measure of the overall competence in various areas including technology, appropriate regulatory framework, cooperation among national and local governments, and the allocation of responsibility among the national government, local governments and utilities. ● Since other energy options also have their advantages and disadvantages (in terms of supply stability, economic efficiency, global warming mitigation, etc.), completely phasing out nuclear power would incur significant risk. Japan must develop safer nuclear power, which is supported by people.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Energy Future
    California’s Energy Future: The View to 2050 Summary Report May 2011 Jane C. S. Long (co-chair) LEGAL NOTICE This report was prepared pursuant to a contract between the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the California Council on Science and Technology (CCST). It does not represent the views of the CEC, its employees, or the State of California. The CEC, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warranty, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the use of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would also like to thank the Stephen Bechtel Fund and the California Energy Commision for their contributions to the underwriting of this project. We would also like to thank the California Air Resources Board for their continued support and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory for underwriting the leadership of this effort. COPYRIGHT Copyright 2011 by the California Council on Science and Technology. Library of Congress Cataloging Number in Publications Data Main Entry Under Title: California’s Energy Future: A View to 2050 May 2011 ISBN-13: 978-1-930117-44-0 Note: The California Council on Science and Technology (CCST) has made every reasonable effort to assure the accuracy of the information in this publication. However, the contents of this publication are subject to changes, omissions, and errors, and CCST does not accept responsibility for any inaccuracies that may occur. CCST is a non-profit organization established in 1988 at the request of the California State Government and sponsored by the major public and private postsecondary institutions of California and affiliate federal laboratories in conjunction with leading private-sector firms.
    [Show full text]
  • T O M O R R O W 2 0
    2015 TOMORROW Table of Contents The American Petroleum Institute Our Energy Tomorrow .............................................................. 2 Jack Gerard, The American Petroleum Institute The American Petroleum Institute (API) is a America’s Petroleum Renaissance ................................................... 5 national trade association that represents The American Petroleum Institute all segments of America’s innovation-driven oil and natural gas industry. Its more than Nuclear Energy Reliably Powers America ............................................. 9 The Nuclear Energy Institute 600 members — including large integrated companies, exploration and production, Hydropower | A Wave of Potential for a Renewable Energy Future ...................... 13 refining, marketing, pipeline, marine shipping The National Hydropower Association and support businesses, and service and Solar Energy in America Shines Bright .............................................. 17 supply firms — provide most of the nation’s The Solar Energy Industries Association energy and are backed by a growing Geothermal Power | Renewable Energy from the Earth’s Warmth ...................... 21 grassroots movement of more than 27 million The Geothermal Energy Association Americans. The industry also supports 9.8 million U.S. jobs and 8 percent of the U.S. Special Section | Infrastructure — The Essential Link to a Secure Energy Future ........ 25 economy, delivers $85 million a day in Natural Gas | America’s Abundant, Clean Energy ..................................... 29 revenue to our government1 and, since The American Petroleum Institute 2000, has invested more than $3 trillion The Attributes of Wind Energy are Adding Up ........................................ 33 in U.S. capital projects to advance all The American Wind Energy Association 2 forms of energy. Electricity from Coal is a Vital, But Threatened, Energy Source ......................... 37 The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity Biomass Power | Ready, Proven and Cost-Effective Energy ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii State Energy Office 2020 Annual Report
    Hawaii State Energy Office Annual Report 2020 ENERGY.HAWAII.GOV Contents Message from the Chief Energy Officer 3 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 9 Dashboard: By-The-Numbers 11 Part 1: Priority Objectives and Policies Clean Energy to Achieve a Clean Economy 12 Energy Assurance and Resiliency 12 Renewable Energy Deployment 13 Energy Efficiency 14 Clean Transportation 15 Stakeholder and Community Education, Outreach, and Engagement 17 Data Analytics 18 Part 2: Ongoing Mandated Activities Introduction 20 Promoting Energy Efficiency 21 Promoting Renewable Energy 25 Promoting Clean Transportation 31 Achieving a Resilient, Clean Energy Economy 33 Part 3: Energy Program Administration and Funding Introduction 42 Administration 43 Energy Security Special Fund 43 Federal Funds 44 Other Funds 45 Energy Program Funding Tables 46 HSEO’s Goals, Plans, and Measurements 49 1 | Hawaii State Energy Office 2020 Annual Report This report fulfills the reporting requirements for: Act 100, Section 7 (SLH 1999) Act 122 (SLH 2019) HRS 196-10.5(7)(c) HRS 196-41(c)(3) HRS 201-12.8(c) HRS Section 201-104 HRS 235-110.31(l) This annual report required by each of these statutes have been combined into this single, comprehensive report. For screen reader users. The Hawaii State Energy Office recognizes the use of diacritical markings of the Hawaiian language such as the ‘okina (also called a glottal stop) and the kahakō (also called a macron). Please note that screen readers may not read or pronounce the Hawaiian words correctly. 2 | Hawaii State Energy Office 2020 Annual Report Message from the Chief Energy Officer Not since World War II has Hawai‘i experienced such a disruption to its way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Asia/World Energy Outlook ― Focusing on ASEAN Economies Towards Market Integration ― ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ Zheng LU Shigeru SUEHIRO Yuji MATSUO Yukari YAMASHITA Kokichi ITO
    IEEJ：May 2017 © IEEJ2017 Asia/World Energy Outlook ― Focusing on ASEAN Economies towards Market Integration ― ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ Zheng LU Shigeru SUEHIRO Yuji MATSUO Yukari YAMASHITA Kokichi ITO This paper presents the major results of a long-term outlook of energy supply and demand, and CO2 emissions for Asia and the world, especially the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) region. The world’s primary energy consumption will reach 18.9 Gtoe (billion tons of oil equivalent) in 2040, up 40% from 2014. During the same period, ASEAN’s primary energy consumption will expand 2.2-fold, accounting for 14% of the global increment. ASEAN’s coal consumption will increase 3.5-fold, accounting for 40% of the world's increment. One-fifth of global energy-related CO2 emission growth (9.5 billion tons from 2014 to 2040) will be due to ASEAN. Due to a rapid increase in fossil fuel demand, ASEAN will become a net importer of fossil fuels. On the other hand, ASEAN countries will require enormous investment in energy resource development and infrastructure construction. In order to promote effective use of regional energy resources, infrastructure consolidation, such as power grid interconnection, can be expected to reduce energy imports, increase the energy self-sufficiency rate and suppress CO2 emissions. Keywords: Energy outlook, ASEAN, Integration of market, Energy investment 1. Foreword developed countries. As energy infrastructure In response to weak economic recovery in development is insufficient in ASEAN countries such Western countries and economic modulation in China as Myanmar and Cambodia, the ASEAN region’s and other emerging countries, global energy non-electrification rate was as high as 19% as of consumption growth has decelerated over recent 2013, with some 120 million people having no access years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Netherlands's Effort to Phase out and Rationalise Its Fossil-Fuel
    The Netherlands’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies An OECD/IEA review of fossil-fuel subsidies in the Netherlands PUBE 2 This report was prepared by Assia Elgouacem (OECD) and Peter Journeay-Kaler (IEA) under the supervision of Nathalie Girouard, Head of the Environmental Performance and Information Division in Environmental Directorate of the Organisation of Economic Co-operation and Development and Aad van Bohemen, Head of the Energy Policy and Security Division at the International Energy Agency. The authors are grateful for valuable feedback from colleagues at the OECD, Kurt Van Dender, Justine Garrett, Rachel Bae and Mark Mateo. Stakeholder comments from Laurie van der Burg (Oil Change International) and Ronald Steenblik (International Institute for Sustainable Development), Herman Volleberg (Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving) were also taken into account. THE NETHERLANDS’S EFFORT TO PHASE OUT AND RATIONALISE ITS FOSSIL-FUEL SUBSIDIES © OECD 2020 3 Table of contents The Netherlands’s Effort to Phase Out and Rationalise its Fossil-Fuel Subsidies 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 Executive Summary 6 1. Introduction 8 2. Energy sector overview 11 3. Fossil-fuel subsidies in the Netherlands 21 4. Assessments and Recommendations 35 References 41 Tables Table 1. Indicative 2030 emission reduction targets, by sector 19 Table 2. The Netherlands’ 2020 and 2030 energy targets and 2018 status (EU definitions and data) 20 Table 3. The 13 fossil-fuel subsidies identified in the self-report of the Netherlands 22 Table 4. Scope and tax preferences of identified fossil-fuel subsidies in the EU ETD 23 Table 5. Energy tax and surcharge for renewable energy, 2019 and 2020 31 Table 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Maui County Energy Alliance Report
    Page | 2 “Our precarious dependence on imported fossil fuel underscores the urgency for us to actively pursue renewable energy options.” ‐‐ Mayor Charmaine Tavares (2007) “Through the Clean Energy Initiative and our year‐round resources of wind, solar and waves, Hawaii is uniquely poised to become a global model for renewable energy." ‐‐ Governor Linda Lingle (2008) This report was prepared by the Maui Economic Development Board, Inc. (MEDB) in conjunction with County of Maui Office of Economic Development for the Maui County Energy Alliance (MCEA). We wish to acknowledge the leadership, support, and work of the members of the MCEA Oversight Committee: Mayor Charmaine Tavares, County of Maui; Sheri Morrison, Managing Director, County of Maui; Deidre Tegarden, Coordinator, Office of Economic Development, County of Maui; Dr. Victor Reyes, Energy Commissioner, County of Maui; Jeanne Unemori Skog, President, Maui Economic Development Board; Leslie Wilkins, Vice‐President and Director, Women in Technology, Maui Economic Development Board; Dr. Clyde Sakamoto, Chancellor, Maui Community College; William Parks, Jr., Deputy Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy (on assignment to the Hawaii State Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism). MEDB and the County of Maui Office of Economic Development also wish to acknowledge the tireless contributions of the volunteer members of the MCEA Working Groups, and especially the Working Group Chairs. A listing of members is included in the Supplement of Supporting Documents. Summary of MCEA Working Group Recommendations ‐‐ Sustainable Energy: Strategies for Implementation 09/2009 Page | 3 Summary of MCEA Working Group Recommendations ‐‐ Sustainable Energy: Strategies for Implementation 09/2009 Page | 4 Summary of MCEA Working Group Recommendations ‐‐ Sustainable Energy: Strategies for Implementation 09/2009 Renewable Energy Action Plan: Recommendations from the MCEA Working Groups Table of Contents Page | 5 Overview 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy in the UK 2018
    13/09/2018 09:45 13/09/2018 1 v2.indd 2018 UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy 2018 Energy in the UK the in Energy The voice of the energy industry energy the of voice The 36355_EUK_Energy in the UK 2018_LR2.job 09/13/2018 09:58:42 1-A $[color] $[color] B - 1 09:58:42 09/13/2018 2018_LR2.job UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy Contents Foreword 4 From the Climate Change Act to 16 The Energy Overview 6 EMR, Transforming UK Generation Employment within Energy 7 - The Climate Change Act Sets the Scene 16 The Heart of the UK Economy 8 - Investment in Renewables 17 People of UK Energy 10 - Renewable Generation across 19 - Skills 12 the UK -Young Energy Professionals (YEP) 13 - Delivering Security of Supply 22 - Equality and Diversity in Energy 14 - Further Steps Away From Coal 23 - Pride in Energy 15 - Air Quality and Environmental 25 Protection 2 3 36355_EUK_Energy in the UK 2018 v2.indd 2 13/09/2018 09:45 $[color] A - 2 09:58:42 09/13/2018 2018_LR2.job UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy Now and Tomorrow, Building the Future 27 A Changing Retail Market 36 for Customers - Engaging with Customers 36 - Integrating Renewable Generation in the 27 - The Smart Meter Revolution 38 System and the Need for Flexibility - Supporting Customers in 39 - Decarbonisation at Customers’ Level 30 Vulnerable Circumstances - Improving Efficiency in Energy 30 - The Challenge of Heat 31 Energy UK Members 42 - Decarbonising UK Transport 32 2 3 36355_EUK_Energy in the UK 2018 v2.indd 3 13/09/2018 09:45 $[color] B - 2 09:58:42 09/13/2018 2018_LR2.job UK the in 36355_EUK_Energy Foreword Last year I wrote about how the energy We will also be feeding into the Five Year system was changing.
    [Show full text]
  • G-2: Total Primary Energy Supply
    G-2: Total primary energy supply 1) General description ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1) Brief definition .................................................................................................................................. 2 1.2) Units of measurement ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3) Context………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………2 2) Relevance for environmental policy ......................................................................................... 2 2.1) Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 2 2.2) Issue ....................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3) International agreements and targets ................................................................................. 3 a) Global level ............................................................................................................................................ 3 b) Regional level ........................................................................................................................................ 3 c) Subregional level .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the 2018 Legislature Annual Report
    REPORT TO THE 2018 LEGISLATURE ANNUAL REPORT FROM THE HAWAI‘I NATURAL ENERGY INSTITUTE HRS 304A-1891 December 2017 AnnualHawai Report ‘i NaturalHawai‘i Natural Energy Institute InstituteDecember 2017 School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Annual Report to the 2017 Legislature HRS 304A-1891 SUBJECT: Annual Report on Activities, Expenditures, Contracts Developed, Advances in Technologies, Work in Coordination with State Agencies and Programs, and Recommendations for Proposed Legislation, required in accordance with HRS 304A- 1891 (Act 253, SLH 2007). SUMMARY: The Hawai‘i Natural Energy Institute (HNEI) conducts essential energy research relevant to Hawai‘i and the world. Research projects focus on identifying technically sound, cost effective solutions and practical strategies that can be implemented to deliver commercially viable renewable energy, improve grid reliability and resilience, and enhance energy efficiency. The ultimate goal is to achieve a stable and cost- effective energy mix for Hawai‘i, while reducing Hawai‘i’s dependence on oil and other fossil fuel resources. HNEI brings together people from a wide range of disciplines and different types of organizations to tackle the urgent and complex sustainable energy needs of the state and the nation. Analysis, research, engineering, economics, and policy are integrated to develop technology, strategies and policies that will have significant positive impact on the energy mix. 2 hnei.hawaii.edu Annual Report Hawai‘i Natural Energy Institute December 2017 HNEI is committed to supporting the State, Federal agencies and industry in planning and implementing clean energy initiatives. HNEI’s activities can be grouped into five core functions: • Research & Development • Technical Validation & Implementation • Analysis & Modeling • Education & Training • State Energy & Policy Support Figure 1.
    [Show full text]