Spergularia in Auckland Mike Wilcox
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Plant List for Web Page
Stanford Working Plant List 1/15/08 Common name Botanical name Family origin big-leaf maple Acer macrophyllum Aceraceae native box elder Acer negundo var. californicum Aceraceae native common water plantain Alisma plantago-aquatica Alismataceae native upright burhead Echinodorus berteroi Alismataceae native prostrate amaranth Amaranthus blitoides Amaranthaceae native California amaranth Amaranthus californicus Amaranthaceae native Powell's amaranth Amaranthus powellii Amaranthaceae native western poison oak Toxicodendron diversilobum Anacardiaceae native wood angelica Angelica tomentosa Apiaceae native wild celery Apiastrum angustifolium Apiaceae native cutleaf water parsnip Berula erecta Apiaceae native bowlesia Bowlesia incana Apiaceae native rattlesnake weed Daucus pusillus Apiaceae native Jepson's eryngo Eryngium aristulatum var. aristulatum Apiaceae native coyote thistle Eryngium vaseyi Apiaceae native cow parsnip Heracleum lanatum Apiaceae native floating marsh pennywort Hydrocotyle ranunculoides Apiaceae native caraway-leaved lomatium Lomatium caruifolium var. caruifolium Apiaceae native woolly-fruited lomatium Lomatium dasycarpum dasycarpum Apiaceae native large-fruited lomatium Lomatium macrocarpum Apiaceae native common lomatium Lomatium utriculatum Apiaceae native Pacific oenanthe Oenanthe sarmentosa Apiaceae native 1 Stanford Working Plant List 1/15/08 wood sweet cicely Osmorhiza berteroi Apiaceae native mountain sweet cicely Osmorhiza chilensis Apiaceae native Gairdner's yampah (List 4) Perideridia gairdneri gairdneri Apiaceae -
JABG25P097 Barker
JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2012 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 25 (2011) 97–103 © 2012 Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Govt of South Australia Name changes associated with the South Australian census of vascular plants for the calendar year 2011 R.M. Barker & P.J. Lang and the staff and associates of the State Herbarium of South Australia State Herbarium of South Australia, DENR Science Resource Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Keywords: Census, plant list, new species, introductions, weeds, native species, nomenclature, taxonomy. The following tables show the changes, and the phrase names in Eremophila, Spergularia, Caladenia reasons why they were made, in the census of South and Thelymitra being formalised, e.g. Eremophila sp. Australian vascular plants for the calendar year 2011. Fallax (D.E.Symon 12311) was the informal phrase The census is maintained in a database by the State name for the now formally published Eremophila fallax Herbarium of South Australia and projected on the Chinnock. -
Vascular Plants of Vina Plains Preserve Wurlitzer Unit
DO r:r:i :;:i·,iOVE Ff.'f)l,1 . ,- . - . "'I":; Vascular Plants of Vina Plains Preserve, Wurlitzer Unit Vernon H. Oswald Vaseular Plants of Vina Plains Preserve, Wurlitzer Unit Vernon H . Oswald Department of Biological Sciences California State University, C h ico Ch ico, California 95929-0515 1997 Revision RED BLUFF •CORN ING TEHAMA CO. -------------B1JITECO. ORLAND HWY 32 FIGURE I. Location of Vina P la.ins Preserve, Main Unit on the north, Wurlitzer Unit on the south. CONTENTS Figure 1. Location of Vina Plains Preserve ...... ................................. facing contents Figure 2. Wurlitzer Unit, Vina Plains Preserve ..... ............................... facing page I Introduction .. ... ..................................... ................................ ....... ....... ... ................ I References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4 The Plant List: Ferns and fem allies .......... ................................................... ........... ................. 5 Di cot flowering plants ............... ...................................................... ................. 5 Monocot flowering plants .......... ..................................................................... 25 / ... n\ a: t, i. FIGURE 2. Wurlitzer Unit, Vina Plains Preserve (in yellow), with a small comer of the Main Unit showing on the north. Modified from USGS 7.5' topographic maps, Richardson Springs NW & Nord quadrangles. - - INTRODUCTION 1 A survey of the vascular flora of the Wurl itzer -
Flora and Fauna Specialist Assessment Report for the Proposed De Aar 2 South Grid Connection Near De Aar, Northern Cape Province
FLORA AND FAUNA SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED DE AAR 2 SOUTH GRID CONNECTION NEAR DE AAR, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE On behalf of Mulilo De Aar 2 South (Pty) Ltd December 2020 Prepared By: Arcus Consultancy Services South Africa (Pty) Limited Office 607 Cube Workspace Icon Building Cnr Long Street and Hans Strijdom Avenue Cape Town 8001 T +27 (0) 21 412 1529 l E [email protected] W www.arcusconsulting.co.za Registered in South Africa No. 2015/416206/07 Flora & Fauna Impact Assessment Report De Aar 2 South Transmission Line and Switching Station TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Assessment Philosophy .................................................................................. 4 1.3 Scope of Study ................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Assumptions and Limitations ......................................................................... 5 2 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 5 3 RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Northern Upper -
Washington Flora Checklist a Checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium
Washington Flora Checklist A checklist of the Vascular Plants of Washington State Hosted by the University of Washington Herbarium The Washington Flora Checklist aims to be a complete list of the native and naturalized vascular plants of Washington State, with current classifications, nomenclature and synonymy. The checklist currently contains 3,929 terminal taxa (species, subspecies, and varieties). Taxa included in the checklist: * Native taxa whether extant, extirpated, or extinct. * Exotic taxa that are naturalized, escaped from cultivation, or persisting wild. * Waifs (e.g., ballast plants, escaped crop plants) and other scarcely collected exotics. * Interspecific hybrids that are frequent or self-maintaining. * Some unnamed taxa in the process of being described. Family classifications follow APG IV for angiosperms, PPG I (J. Syst. Evol. 54:563?603. 2016.) for pteridophytes, and Christenhusz et al. (Phytotaxa 19:55?70. 2011.) for gymnosperms, with a few exceptions. Nomenclature and synonymy at the rank of genus and below follows the 2nd Edition of the Flora of the Pacific Northwest except where superceded by new information. Accepted names are indicated with blue font; synonyms with black font. Native species and infraspecies are marked with boldface font. Please note: This is a working checklist, continuously updated. Use it at your discretion. Created from the Washington Flora Checklist Database on September 17th, 2018 at 9:47pm PST. Available online at http://biology.burke.washington.edu/waflora/checklist.php Comments and questions should be addressed to the checklist administrators: David Giblin ([email protected]) Peter Zika ([email protected]) Suggested citation: Weinmann, F., P.F. Zika, D.E. Giblin, B. -
BSBI News September 2016 No
BSBI News September 2016 No. 133 Edited by Trevor James & Gwynn Ellis ISSN 0309-930X Gymnadenia borealis Gymnadenia conopsea Gymnadenia conopsea × G. borealis All Gymnadenia photos taken at Sleets Gill near Kilnsey in the Yorkshire Dales (v.c.64) by Jesse Tregale © 2016 (see p. 6) CONTENTS Important Notices Botanical Crossword 28...........Cruciada 32 From the President..................J. Faulkner 2 News of Members.................................... 33 BSBI Review..J. Houldsworth, Mark Spencer......................D. Pearman 33 ..................J. Faulkner & C. Metherell 3 Botanical Crossword 28...........Cruciada 41 Notes from the Editors T. James & G. Ellis 3 Requests................................................... 42 Notes...................................................... 4-31 Forthcoming book – A new botanical Keeping the wild in wild flowers? teratology..................T. McCloughlin 33 ..............................................K. Walker 4 Diary for 2016......................C. Metherell 33 Putative Fragrant Orchid (Gymnadenia) Recorders and Recording.................. 34-37 hybrid in the Yorkshire Dales Panel of Referees and Specialists.....J. Ison 34 ..........................................B.A. Tregale 6 Panel of Vice-county Recorders P. Stroh 34 Attracting young botanists..........N. Miller 7 Where and what do we record? Ophrys finds in Dorset............R.M. Walls 8 ....K. Walker, D. Pearman & P. Stroh 35 A monstrous Scrophularia nodosa Digital archiving.....................Q. Groom 36 ...............................T.J.J. -
NE-R-Part II Results & Rec CWL Schedules Review
PART II Results and recommendations from the review of Schedules and protected species under the Conservation of Wildlife (Jersey) Law 2000 Report Authors Nina Cornish Department of the Environment John Pinel Howard Davis Farm Lindsey Napton Trinity 2015 CONTENTS Page no. Introduction 4 Background 4 1) Schedules for protected species 6 1.1) Review of Schedules 6 1.2) Birds which reuse their nest 7 1.3) Birds which may be killed or taken 9 1.3.1) Corvids & Pigeons 9 1.3.2) Cage Traps 11 1.3.3) Pheasants 11 1.4) Introduction of new species and invasive non-native 13 species 1.4.1) 14ZA - Sale etc. of invasive non-native species; 16 1.4.2) 14ZB - Codes of practice in connection with invasive 16 non-native species. 1.5) Animals which may not be taken or killed in certain 17 ways 1.6) New Schedules 19 1.6.1) Invertebrate Species (terrestrial) 19 1.6.2) Bryophytes, Fungi and Lichens 21 1.6.3) Marine Species 23 1.7) Summary of new recommended schedules 25 2) Levels of protection 26 2.1) Focus group results - Levels of protection 30 2.2) Recommended framework for defining different levels 30 of protection 3) Criteria for listing species 32 3.1) Endangered under the IUCN 33 3.1.1) Figure - Structure of the IUCN Red List Categories 33 3.2) Selection criteria for listing species onto Schedules 33 under the CWL 3.2.1) Table – Criteria comparison 34 3.3) Proposed Criteria for Scheduling species under 34 Schedule 1 (part I & II) and 2 of the Conservation of the Wildlife Law 2000 (CWL) 3.4) Species listing 39 3.4.1) Jersey listings 39 3.4.2 Table - -
Detoxification of Heavy Metals (Soil Biology
Soil Biology Volume 30 Series Editor Ajit Varma, Amity Institute of Microbial Technology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, UP, India For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/5138 . Irena Sherameti l Ajit Varma Editors Detoxification of Heavy Metals Editors Dr. Irena Sherameti Prof. Dr. Ajit Varma Friedrich-Schiller Universita¨t Jena Amity University Uttar Pradesh Institut fu¨r Allgemeine Botanik und Amity Institute of Microbial Sciences Pflanzenphysiologie Noida Uttar Pradesh Dornburger Str. 159 Block A, Ground Floor, Sector 125 07743 Jena India Germany [email protected] [email protected] ISSN 1613-3382 ISBN 978-3-642-21407-3 e-ISBN 978-3-642-21408-0 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-21408-0 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011934686 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Violations are liable to prosecution under the German Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. -
BSBI News 123
BSBI News April 2013 No. 123 Edited by Trevor James & Gwynn Ellis ISSN 0309-930X Eric Clement botanising at Thorney Island in October 2011. Photo G. Hounsome © 2011 (see p. 66) Spartina patens in saltmarsh on the east side of Thorney Island. Photo G. Hounsome © 2012 (see p. 66) Frankenia laevis (Sea-heath) growing over roadside kerb, Helmsley-Kirbymoorside road, North Yorks. Photo N.A. Thompson © 2009 (see p. 48) Paul Green (acting Welsh Officer) at The Carex ×gaudiniana Glen Shee, Cairnwell, Raven, Co. Wexford. Photo O. Martin © 2008 v.c.92. Photo M. Wilcox © 2012 (see p. 28) (see p. 86) Alchemilla wichurae, Teesdale, showing 45° angle of main veins. Photo M. Lynes © 2012 (see p. 25) Pentaglottis sempervirens, Kirkcaldy, Fife (v.c.85). Photo G. Ballantyne © 2012 (see p. 64) CONTENTS Important Notices Changing status and ecology of Blysmus rufus From The President.....................................I. Bonner 2 (Saltmarsh Flat-sedge) in South Lancashire (v.c.59) Notes from the Editors....................T. James & G. Ellis 2 ...........................................................P.H. Smith 55 Notes...........................................................................3–63 Aliens.................................................................... 64–67 Eleocharis mitracarpa Steud., not a British plant Malling Toadflax population in Oxfordshire ...........................................................F.J. Roberts 3 ........................................A. Baket & G. Southon 64 Eleocharis: problems with the Flora Europaea account -
Environmental Management 147: 108–123
Powered by Editorial Manager® and ProduXion Manager® from Aries Systems Corporation Manuscript - NO track change Click here to view linked References Can artificial ecosystems enhance local biodiversity? The case of a constructed wetland in a 1 2 Mediterranean urban context 3 4 Abstract 5 6 7 Constructed wetlands (CW) are considered a successful tool to treat wastewater in many countries: 8 9 5 their success is mainly assessed observing the rate of pollution reduction, but CW can also 10 11 contribute to the conservation of ecosystem services. Among the many ecosystem services 12 13 provided, the biodiversity of constructed wetlands has received less attention. 14 The EcoSistema Filtro (ESF) of the Molentargius-Saline Regional Natural Park is a constructed 15 16 wetland situated in Sardinia (Italy), built to filter treated wastewater, increase habitat diversity and 17 18 10 enhance local biodiversity. A floristic survey has been carried out yearly one year after the 19 20 construction of the artificial ecosystem in 2004, observing the modification of the vascular flora 21 22 composition in time. The flora of the ESF accounted for 54% of the whole Regional Park’s flora; 23 alien species amount to 12%, taxa of conservation concern are 6%. Comparing the data in the years, 24 25 except for the biennium 2006/2007, we observed a continuous increase of species richness, together 26 27 15 with an increase of endemics, species of conservation concern and alien species too. Once the 28 29 endemics appeared, they remained part of the flora, showing a good persistence in the artificial 30 31 wetland. -
The Vascular Plant Red Data List for Great Britain
Species Status No. 7 The Vascular Plant Red Data List for Great Britain Christine M. Cheffings and Lynne Farrell (Eds) T.D. Dines, R.A. Jones, S.J. Leach, D.R. McKean, D.A. Pearman, C.D. Preston, F.J. Rumsey, I.Taylor Further information on the JNCC Species Status project can be obtained from the Joint Nature Conservation Committee website at http://www.jncc.gov.uk/ Copyright JNCC 2005 ISSN 1473-0154 (Online) Membership of the Working Group Botanists from different organisations throughout Britain and N. Ireland were contacted in January 2003 and asked whether they would like to participate in the Working Group to produce a new Red List. The core Working Group, from the first meeting held in February 2003, consisted of botanists in Britain who had a good working knowledge of the British and Irish flora and could commit their time and effort towards the two-year project. Other botanists who had expressed an interest but who had limited time available were consulted on an appropriate basis. Chris Cheffings (Secretariat to group, Joint Nature Conservation Committee) Trevor Dines (Plantlife International) Lynne Farrell (Chair of group, Scottish Natural Heritage) Andy Jones (Countryside Council for Wales) Simon Leach (English Nature) Douglas McKean (Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh) David Pearman (Botanical Society of the British Isles) Chris Preston (Biological Records Centre within the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology) Fred Rumsey (Natural History Museum) Ian Taylor (English Nature) This publication should be cited as: Cheffings, C.M. & Farrell, L. (Eds), Dines, T.D., Jones, R.A., Leach, S.J., McKean, D.R., Pearman, D.A., Preston, C.D., Rumsey, F.J., Taylor, I. -
Spergularia Iraqensis (Caryophyllaceae), a New Species from Iraq
Haloob et al. Bull. Iraq nat. Hist. Mus. (2021) 16 (3): 291-299. https://doi.org/10.26842/binhm.7.2021.16.3.0291 SHORT COMMUNICATION SPERGULARIA IRAQENSIS (CARYOPHYLLACEAE), A NEW SPECIES FROM IRAQ Ali Haloob*♦ Ali H. E. Al-Musawi** and Harb Adeel*** * National Herbarium of Iraq, Directorate of Seed Testing and Certification, Ministry of Agriculture of Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq. ** Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. *** Directorate of Plant Protection, Ministry of Agriculture of Iraq, Baghdad, Iraq. ♦Corresponding author: [email protected] Received Date: 18 February 2021, Accepted Date: 22 April 2021, Published Date: 20 Jun 2021 ABSTRACT Spergularia iraqensis sp. nov. is described as a new species from Iraq. This species has been collected from Diyala Province in the central east of Iraq; it is closely related to Spergularia rubra (L.) J. Presl & C. Presl, 1819 and Spergularia bocconei (Scheele) Graebn., 1919. The distinguishing of the morphological characteristics of the new species alongside the two similar species are discussed with photographs, and an identification key is given for Spergularia iraqensis and other closely related species. Keywords: Caryophyllaceae, Diyala, Endemic, Iraq, Spergularia. INTRODUCTION Spergularia (Pers.) J.Presl & C.Presl, 1819 is a cosmopolitan genus with about 40 species; some of these species are halophytes and distributed worldwide (Ghazanfar and Nasir, 1986; Townsend et al., 2016). The first revision of the genus Spergularia in Iraq was done by .Mazzetti (1910); he recognized two species which are Spergularia salina J. Presl & CـHandle Presl, 1819 and Spergularia diandra (Guss.) Heldr., 1851; later Guest (1933) reports that there are two species of the genus Spergularia, S.