DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora and Fauna Specialist Assessment Report for the Proposed De Aar 2 South Grid Connection Near De Aar, Northern Cape Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flora and Fauna Specialist Assessment Report for the Proposed De Aar 2 South Grid Connection Near De Aar, Northern Cape Province FLORA AND FAUNA SPECIALIST ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED DE AAR 2 SOUTH GRID CONNECTION NEAR DE AAR, NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE On behalf of Mulilo De Aar 2 South (Pty) Ltd December 2020 Prepared By: Arcus Consultancy Services South Africa (Pty) Limited Office 607 Cube Workspace Icon Building Cnr Long Street and Hans Strijdom Avenue Cape Town 8001 T +27 (0) 21 412 1529 l E [email protected] W www.arcusconsulting.co.za Registered in South Africa No. 2015/416206/07 Flora & Fauna Impact Assessment Report De Aar 2 South Transmission Line and Switching Station TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Assessment Philosophy .................................................................................. 4 1.3 Scope of Study ................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Assumptions and Limitations ......................................................................... 5 2 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 5 3 RESULTS .................................................................................................................... 5 3.1 Vegetation ...................................................................................................... 6 3.1.1 Northern Upper Karoo ............................................................................................ 6 3.1.2 Besemkaree Koppies Shrubland ............................................................................... 7 3.2 Biodiversity Conservation .............................................................................. 8 3.2.1 Vegetation types .................................................................................................... 8 3.2.2 Biodiversity Planning .............................................................................................. 8 3.2.3 Plant Species ....................................................................................................... 10 3.2.4 Vertebrate Species ............................................................................................... 12 3.2.5 Invertebrate Species ............................................................................................. 17 3.2.6 Habitats ............................................................................................................... 18 3.2.7 Habitat Sensitivity ................................................................................................ 22 3.3 Sensitivity Assessment ................................................................................. 23 4 IMPACT ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 24 4.1 Identification of Potential Impacts .............................................................. 24 4.1.1 Construction Phase Impacts .................................................................................. 25 4.1.2 Operational Phase Impacts ................................................................................... 25 4.1.3 Cumulative Impacts .............................................................................................. 25 5 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS ...................................................................................... 25 5.1 Construction Phase Impacts ........................................................................ 25 5.1.1 Impact 1: Loss or fragmentation of indigenous natural vegetation ........................... 25 5.1.2 Impact 2: Loss of individuals of threatened or protected plant species ..................... 26 5.1.3 Impact 3: Loss of faunal habitat and refugia .......................................................... 27 5.1.4 Impact 4: Direct impact to fauna due to construction ............................................. 28 5.1.5 Impact 5: Displacement or disturbance of fauna due to increased activity and noise levels ................................................................................................................... 29 5.2 Operational Phase Impacts .......................................................................... 30 5.2.1 Impact 6: Direct faunal impacts due to operation ................................................... 30 Arcus Consultancy Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd Mulilo De Aar 2 South (Pty) Ltd December 2020 Page i Flora & Fauna Impact Assessment Report De Aar 2 South Transmission Line and Switching Station 5.2.2 Impact 7: Alien Plant Invasion .............................................................................. 30 5.2.3 Impact 8: Soil Erosion Risk ................................................................................... 31 5.3 Cumulative Impacts ..................................................................................... 32 5.3.1 Impact 9: Impacts on Broad-Scale Ecological Processes .......................................... 32 5.3.2 Impact 10: Impact on Conservation Objectives ...................................................... 32 6 OPPORTUNITIES ..................................................................................................... 33 7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................. 33 APPENDICES ...................................................................................................................... 35 APPENDIX I: METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................ 35 Data Sources ........................................................................................................... 35 Existing Studies ............................................................................................................... 35 Site Visit .......................................................................................................................... 35 Species 35 Vegetation ...................................................................................................................... 36 Ecosystems ..................................................................................................................... 36 Species of Concern .......................................................................................................... 36 APPENDIX II: LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS .................................................................... 37 Convention on Biodiversity (CBD) ..................................................................................... 37 National Environmental Management Act (Act No. 107 of 1998, NEMA) .............................. 38 National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (Act No. 10 of 2004, NEMBA) ........... 38 National Forests Act (Act No. 84 of 1998) .......................................................................... 39 National Water Act (Act No. 36 of 1998) ........................................................................... 39 Conservation of Agricultural Resources Act (Act No. 43 of 1983 as amended in 2001) .......... 39 National Veld and Forest Fire Act (Act No. 101 of 1998) ..................................................... 39 Northern Cape Nature Conservation Act (Act No. 9 of 2009) ............................................... 39 APPENDIX III: IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE RATING SYSTEM ................................................. 40 APPENDIX IV: POTENTIAL PLANT SPECIES ON THE PROJECT SITE .................................. 42 APPENDIX V: POTENTIAL PROTECTED PLANT SPECIES ON THE PROJECT SITE ............... 45 APPENDIX VI: POTENTIAL MAMMAL SPECIES ON THE PROJECT SITE ............................. 46 APPENDIX VII: POTENTIAL AMPHIBIAN SPECIES ON THE PROJECT SITE ....................... 47 APPENDIX VIII: POTENTIAL REPTILE SPECIES ON THE PROJECT SITE ........................... 48 Arcus Consultancy Services South Africa (Pty) Ltd Mulilo De Aar 2 South (Pty) Ltd December 2020 Page ii Flora & Fauna Impact Assessment Report De Aar 2 South Transmission Line and Switching Station APPENDIX IX: POTENTIAL INVERTEBRATE SPECIES ON THE PROJECT SITE ................... 48 Regulation GNR 326 of 4 December 2014, as amended 7 April 2017, Section of Report Appendix 6 (a) details of the specialist who prepared the report; and the expertise of that specialist Attached to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae; (b) a declaration that the specialist is independent in a form as may be specified by the Attached competent authority; (c) an indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared; 1.3 (cA) an indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report; Appendix I (cB) a description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed 4 development and levels of acceptable change; (d) the duration, date and season of the site investigation and the relevance of the 2, 3 season to the outcome of the assessment; (e) a description of the methodology adopted in preparing the report or carrying out Appendix I the specialised process inclusive of equipment and modelling used; (f) details of an assessment of the specific identified sensitivity of the site related to the 4 proposed activity or activities and its associated structures and infrastructure, inclusive of a site plan
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Biogeography of Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): Evidence from Five Nuclear Genes
    Phylogeny and Biogeography of Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): Evidence from Five Nuclear Genes Akito Y. Kawahara1*, Andre A. Mignault1, Jerome C. Regier2, Ian J. Kitching3, Charles Mitter1 1 Department of Entomology, College Park, Maryland, United States of America, 2 Center for Biosystems Research, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, College Park, Maryland, United States of America, 3 Department of Entomology, The Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom Abstract Background: The 1400 species of hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) comprise one of most conspicuous and well- studied groups of insects, and provide model systems for diverse biological disciplines. However, a robust phylogenetic framework for the family is currently lacking. Morphology is unable to confidently determine relationships among most groups. As a major step toward understanding relationships of this model group, we have undertaken the first large-scale molecular phylogenetic analysis of hawkmoths representing all subfamilies, tribes and subtribes. Methodology/Principal Findings: The data set consisted of 131 sphingid species and 6793 bp of sequence from five protein-coding nuclear genes. Maximum likelihood and parsimony analyses provided strong support for more than two- thirds of all nodes, including strong signal for or against nearly all of the fifteen current subfamily, tribal and sub-tribal groupings. Monophyly was strongly supported for some of these, including Macroglossinae, Sphinginae, Acherontiini, Ambulycini, Philampelini, Choerocampina, and Hemarina. Other groupings proved para- or polyphyletic, and will need significant redefinition; these include Smerinthinae, Smerinthini, Sphingini, Sphingulini, Dilophonotini, Dilophonotina, Macroglossini, and Macroglossina. The basal divergence, strongly supported, is between Macroglossinae and Smerinthinae+Sphinginae. All genes contribute significantly to the signal from the combined data set, and there is little conflict between genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List for Web Page
    Stanford Working Plant List 1/15/08 Common name Botanical name Family origin big-leaf maple Acer macrophyllum Aceraceae native box elder Acer negundo var. californicum Aceraceae native common water plantain Alisma plantago-aquatica Alismataceae native upright burhead Echinodorus berteroi Alismataceae native prostrate amaranth Amaranthus blitoides Amaranthaceae native California amaranth Amaranthus californicus Amaranthaceae native Powell's amaranth Amaranthus powellii Amaranthaceae native western poison oak Toxicodendron diversilobum Anacardiaceae native wood angelica Angelica tomentosa Apiaceae native wild celery Apiastrum angustifolium Apiaceae native cutleaf water parsnip Berula erecta Apiaceae native bowlesia Bowlesia incana Apiaceae native rattlesnake weed Daucus pusillus Apiaceae native Jepson's eryngo Eryngium aristulatum var. aristulatum Apiaceae native coyote thistle Eryngium vaseyi Apiaceae native cow parsnip Heracleum lanatum Apiaceae native floating marsh pennywort Hydrocotyle ranunculoides Apiaceae native caraway-leaved lomatium Lomatium caruifolium var. caruifolium Apiaceae native woolly-fruited lomatium Lomatium dasycarpum dasycarpum Apiaceae native large-fruited lomatium Lomatium macrocarpum Apiaceae native common lomatium Lomatium utriculatum Apiaceae native Pacific oenanthe Oenanthe sarmentosa Apiaceae native 1 Stanford Working Plant List 1/15/08 wood sweet cicely Osmorhiza berteroi Apiaceae native mountain sweet cicely Osmorhiza chilensis Apiaceae native Gairdner's yampah (List 4) Perideridia gairdneri gairdneri Apiaceae
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Biodiversity Compliance Report for The
    TERRESTRIAL BIODIVERSITY COMPLIANCE REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED DE AAR 2 SOUTH WEF ON-SITE SUBSTATION, BATTERY ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM (BESS) AND ANCILLARY INFRASTRUCTURE, NEAR DE AAR IN THE NORTHERN CAPE PROVINCE. For Mulilo De Aar 2 South (Pty) Ltd July 2020 Prepared By: Arcus Consultancy Services South Africa (Pty) Limited Office 607 Cube Workspace Icon Building Cnr Long Street and Hans Strijdom Avenue Cape Town 8001 T +27 (0) 21 412 1529 l E [email protected] W www.arcusconsulting.co.za Registered in South Africa No. 2015/416206/07 Terrestrial Biodiversity Compliance Report De Aar 2 South WEF Substation TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Background .................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Scope of Study ................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Assumptions and Limitations ......................................................................... 4 2 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Desk-top Study ............................................................................................... 4 2.2 Site Visit ......................................................................................................... 5 3 RESULTS AND DESCRIPTION OF THE AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................ 5 3.1 Vegetation
    [Show full text]
  • Universitatis Babe -Bolyai Ş
    STUDIA BABE -BOLYAI UNIVERSITATIS Ş 1 Biologia CLUJ-NAPOCA 2006 ANUL LI 2006 S T U D I A UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ–BOLYAI BIOLOGIA 1 EDITORIAL OFFICE: Republicii no. 24, 4000015 Cluj-Napoca ♦ Phone 0264-40.53.53 SUMAR – CONTENTS – SOMMAIRE – INHALT S. MIHUŢ, V. DINCĂ, Sphingonaepiopsis gorgoniades (Hübner, [1819]) (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), at i ts First Certain Record in Romania.......................................................3 S. MIHUŢ, V. DINCĂ, New Data Concerning the Presence of the Species Boloria aquilonaris (Stichel, 1908) in the Romanian Entomofauna (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae)…….…….7 C. I. MOGA,. Status of the Avifauna in the Sighişoara Area in 1948 and Present: a Comparative Approach …........................................………………………………….………….…..11 L. GROZA, C. DOBROTĂ, Effects of Copper and Zinc on Strawberry(Fragaria ananassa D.) Fruit Quality…………………………………………………………………………....23 V. BERCEA, E. MUNTEAN, N. DRAGOŞ, B. DRUGĂ, C. VASILESCU, The Photochemical Activity Related to the Xanthophyll Cycle During Photoinhibition and to the Reconversion Period in the Green Alga Mougeotia sp., Strain AICB 560…………….31 V. BERCEA, B. DRUGĂ. C. VASILESCU, N. DRAGOŞ, Excitation Pressure and Energy Nonphotochemical Dissipation under Excess Light in Mougeotia sp., Green Alga Strain AICB 560........................................................................................................................45 C. TARBA, A. FLOREA, Diverse Hepatic Ultrastructural Morphology Induced by Chronic Ethanol Feeding of Rats..................................................................................................57
    [Show full text]
  • Prickly News South Coast Cactus & Succulent Society Newsletter | Feb 2021
    PRICKLY NEWS SOUTH COAST CACTUS & SUCCULENT SOCIETY NEWSLETTER | FEB 2021 Guillermo ZOOM PRESENTATION SHARE YOUR GARDEN OR YOUR FAVORITE PLANT Rivera Sunday, February 14 @ 1:30 pm Cactus diversity in northwestern Argentina: a habitat approach I enjoyed Brian Kemble’s presentation on the Ruth Bancroft Garden in Walnut Creek. For those of you who missed the presentation, check out the website at https://www. ruthbancroftgarden.org for hints on growing, lectures and access to webinars that are available. Email me with photos of your garden and/or plants Brian graciously offered to answer any questions that we can publish as a way of staying connected. or inquiries on the garden by contacting him at [email protected] [email protected]. CALL FOR PHOTOS: The Mini Show genera for February are Cactus: Eriosyce (includes Neoporteria, Islaya and Neochilenia) and Succulent: Crassula. Photos will be published and you will be given To learn more visit southcoastcss.org one Mini-show point each for a submitted photo of your cactus, succulent or garden (up to 2 points). Please include your plant’s full name if you know it (and if you don’t, I will seek advice for you). Like us on our facebook page Let me know if you would prefer not to have your name published with the photos. The photos should be as high resolution as possible so they will publish well and should show off the plant as you would Follow us on Instagram, _sccss_ in a Mini Show. This will provide all of us with an opportunity to learn from one another and share plants and gardens.
    [Show full text]
  • Archiv Für Naturgeschichte
    © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Lepidoptera für 1903. Bearbeitet von Dr. Robert Lucas in Rixdorf bei Berlin. A. Publikationen (Autoren alphabetisch) mit Referaten. Adkin, Robert. Pyrameis cardui, Plusia gamma and Nemophila noc- tuella. The Entomologist, vol. 36. p. 274—276. Agassiz, G. Etüde sur la coloration des ailes des papillons. Lausanne, H. Vallotton u. Toso. 8 °. 31 p. von Aigner-Abafi, A. (1). Variabilität zweier Lepidopterenarten. Verhandlgn. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien, 53. Bd. p. 162—165. I. Argynnis Paphia L. ; IL Larentia bilineata L. — (2). Protoparce convolvuli. Entom. Zeitschr. Guben. 17. Jahrg. p. 22. — (3). Über Mimikry. Gaea. 39. Jhg. p. 166—170, 233—237. — (4). A mimicryröl. Rov. Lapok, vol. X, p. 28—34, 45—53 — (5). A Mimicry. Allat. Kozl. 1902, p. 117—126. — (6). (Über Mimikry). Allgem. Zeitschr. f. Entom. 7. Bd. (Schluß p. 405—409). Über Falterarten, welche auch gesondert von ihrer Umgebung, in ruhendem Zustande eine eigentümliche, das Auge täuschende Form annehmen (Lasiocampa quercifolia [dürres Blatt], Phalera bucephala [zerbrochenes Ästchen], Calocampa exoleta [Stück morschen Holzes]. — [Stabheuschrecke, Acanthoderus]. Raupen, die Meister der Mimikry sind. Nachahmung anderer Tiere. Die Mimik ist in vielen Fällen zwecklos. — Die wenn auch recht geistreichen Mimikry-Theorien sind doch vielleicht nur ein müßiges Spiel der Phantasie. Aitken u. Comber, E. A list of the butterflies of the Konkau. Journ. Bombay Soc. vol. XV. p. 42—55, Suppl. p. 356. Albisson, J. Notes biologiques pour servir ä l'histoire naturelle du Charaxes jasius. Bull. Soc. Etud. Sc. nat. Nimes. T. 30. p. 77—82. Annandale u. Robinson. Siehe unter S w i n h o e.
    [Show full text]
  • Sequencing and Analysis of Chrysanthemum Carinatum Schousb and Kalimeris Indica
    molecules Article Sequencing and Analysis of Chrysanthemum carinatum Schousb and Kalimeris indica. The Complete Chloroplast Genomes Reveal Two Inversions and rbcL as Barcoding of the Vegetable Xia Liu * ID , Boyang Zhou, Hongyuan Yang, Yuan Li, Qian Yang, Yuzhuo Lu and Yu Gao State Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, Ministry of Education of China, College of Food Engineering and Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science &Technology, Tianjin 300457, China; [email protected] (B.Z.); [email protected] (H.Y.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (Q.Y.); [email protected] (Y.L.); [email protected] (Y.G.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-022-6091-2406 Received: 20 April 2018; Accepted: 31 May 2018; Published: 5 June 2018 Abstract: Chrysanthemum carinatum Schousb and Kalimeris indica are widely distributed edible vegetables and the sources of the Chinese medicine Asteraceae. The complete chloroplast (cp) genome of Asteraceae usually occurs in the inversions of two regions. Hence, the cp genome sequences and structures of Asteraceae species are crucial for the cp genome genetic diversity and evolutionary studies. Hence, in this paper, we have sequenced and analyzed for the first time the cp genome size of C. carinatum Schousb and K. indica, which are 149,752 bp and 152,885 bp, with a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) (24,523 bp and 25,003) separated by a large single copy (LSC) region (82,290 bp and 84,610) and a small single copy (SSC) region (18,416 bp and 18,269), respectively. In total, 79 protein-coding genes, 30 distinct transfer RNA (tRNA) genes, four distinct rRNA genes and two pseudogenes were found not only in C.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptiles and Amphibians of the Goegap Nature Reserve
    their time underground in burrows. These amphibians often leave their burrows after heavy rains that are seldom. Reptiles And Amphibians Of The There are reptiles included in this report, which don’t occur here in Goegap but at the Augrabies Falls NP. So you can find here also the Nile monitor and the flat liz- Goegap Nature Reserve ard. Measuring reptiles By Tanja Mahnkopf In tortoises and terrapins the length is measured at the shell. Straight along the mid- line of the carapace. The SV-Length is the length of head and body (Snout to Vent). In lizards it easier to look for this length because their tail may be a regenerated one Introduction and these are often shorter than the original one. The length that is mentioned for the The reptiles are an ancient class on earth. The earliest reptile fossils are about 315 species in this report is the average to the maximum length. For the snakes I tried to million years old. During the aeons of time they evolved a great diversity of extinct give the total length because it is often impossible to say where the tail begins and and living reptiles. The dinosaurs and their relatives dominated the earth 150 million the body ends without holding the snake. But there was not for every snake a total years ago. Our living reptiles are remnants of that period or from a period after the length available. dinosaurs were extinct. Except of the chameleons (there are only two) you can find all reptiles in the appen- Obviously it looks like reptiles are not as successful as mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Faunal Impact Assessment
    FAUNAL, FLORAL, WETLAND AND AQUATIC ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT AS PART OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND AUTHORISATION PROCESS FOR A PROPOSED COAL MINE ON THE REMAINING EXTENT OF THE FARM THE DUEL 186 MT, LIMPOPO PROVINCE Prepared for Jacana Environmentals CC May 2019 Section C: Faunal Assessment Prepared by: Scientific Terrestrial Services Report authors: J.J. du Plessis C. Hooton Report reviewer(s): K. Marais (Pr. Sci. Nat) S. van Staden (Pr Sci. Nat) Report Reference: STS 190011 Date: May 2019 Scientific Terrestrial Services CC CC Reg No 2005/122329/23 PO Box 751779 Gardenview 2047 Tel: 011 616 7893 Fax: 086 724 3132 E-mail: [email protected] STS 190011 - SECTION C: FAUNAL ASSESSMENT May 2019 DOCUMENT GUIDE The Document Guide below is for reference to the procedural requirements for environmental authorisation applications in accordance to GN267 of 24 March 2017, as it pertains to the National Environmental Management Act, 1998 (Act 107 of 1998) (NEMA); No. Requirement Section in report a) Details of - (i) The specialist who prepared the report Section A: Appendix D (ii) The expertise of that specialist to compile a specialist report including a curriculum vitae Section A: Appendix D b) A declaration that the specialist is independent Section A: Appendix D c) An indication of the scope of, and the purpose for which, the report was prepared Section 1 cA) An indication of the quality and age of base data used for the specialist report Section A cB) A description of existing impacts on the site, cumulative impacts of the proposed Section
    [Show full text]
  • JABG25P097 Barker
    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2012 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 25 (2011) 97–103 © 2012 Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Govt of South Australia Name changes associated with the South Australian census of vascular plants for the calendar year 2011 R.M. Barker & P.J. Lang and the staff and associates of the State Herbarium of South Australia State Herbarium of South Australia, DENR Science Resource Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Keywords: Census, plant list, new species, introductions, weeds, native species, nomenclature, taxonomy. The following tables show the changes, and the phrase names in Eremophila, Spergularia, Caladenia reasons why they were made, in the census of South and Thelymitra being formalised, e.g. Eremophila sp. Australian vascular plants for the calendar year 2011. Fallax (D.E.Symon 12311) was the informal phrase The census is maintained in a database by the State name for the now formally published Eremophila fallax Herbarium of South Australia and projected on the Chinnock.
    [Show full text]