DOCSLIB.ORG

JABG25P097 Barker

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2012 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 25 (2011) 97–103 © 2012 Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Govt of South Australia Name changes associated with the South Australian census of vascular plants for the calendar year 2011 R.M. Barker & P.J. Lang and the staff and associates of the State Herbarium of South Australia State Herbarium of South Australia, DENR Science Resource Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Keywords: Census, plant list, new species, introductions, weeds, native species, nomenclature, taxonomy. The following tables show the changes, and the phrase names in Eremophila, Spergularia, Caladenia reasons why they were made, in the census of South and Thelymitra being formalised, e.g. Eremophila sp. Australian vascular plants for the calendar year 2011. Fallax (D.E.Symon 12311) was the informal phrase The census is maintained in a database by the State name for the now formally published Eremophila fallax Herbarium of South Australia and projected on the Chinnock. Other changes were due to the decision to web on the eFloraSA site (www.flora.sa.gov.au). Any treat Chamaesyce as a subgenus of Euphorbia, thus changes made to the census database are reflected on the necessitating the change of all species previously listed web page the next day. as Chamaesyce to the appropriate name in Euphorbia, The Census recognises two broad categories of and likewise the decision to treat the segregate genera plants, native and naturalised. Those species which Hebe and Parahebe as Veronica. Others are just have been introduced to South Australia and have then corrections associated with the misspelling of epithets. become naturalised are indicated by an asterisk before Species listed in Tables 3-5 are either completely their name and are treated in Tables 2 and 4 below. new to the state (i.e. species which have not been listed Species lacking an asterisk are considered to be native for South Australia in past censuses) or they are new to South Australia. There are a few species which do not species or new records which have been treated as part fall happily into either category and two examples are of another species in previous censuses. listed for 2011 in Table 5. It will be noted that sometimes the references Names change for several reasons. Sometimes they supporting these changes are dated several years prior to result from a change in the taxonomy or circumscription 2011. It can take some time to decide whether suggested of the species concerned. Alternatively name changes changes will be adopted since published opinion is not can occur which do not affect the concept of the species, always accepted by the greater botanical community. or at least not in the context of South Australia. Species Rather than making the requisite change and then listed in Tables 1 and 2 fall into the latter category and so finding that the name has to be changed back again, as these can be considered as replacement names for species has happened for some of the grass species, change is which were already present in the census. A number of only made when there is some certainty that this will not the changes recognised in 2011 were due to informal happen. Table 1. Native plants already recognised, but whose names have changed. Actites megalocarpus (Hook.f.) Lander Correction of spelling of epithet only. Caladenia cruciformis D.L.Jones Specimens previously referred to as Caladenia sp. Bordertown (R.S.Rogers 788) R.J.Bates are equated with this species. Also referred to as Arachnorchis cruciformis (D.L.Jones) D.L.Jones & M.A.Clem. in some literature. Caladenia strigosa (D.L.Jones) R.J.Bates New name and new combination provided for previous C. australis and Arach­ norchis strigosa. See Barker & Bates (2008). Cryptandra campanulata Schltdl. Existing published name for Cryptandra sp. Long hypanthium (C.R. Alcock 10626) W.R.Barker (pers. comm. Jürgen Kellermann, AD). Drosera whittakeri Planch. With the raising of D. whittakeri subsp. aberrans to species (Lowrie & Conran 2008) there is no longer a subsp. whittakeri or subsp. aberrans. Eremophila decussata Chinnock Published name for Eremophila sp. Decussate (R.J.Chinnock 7735) Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). 97 R.M. Barker & P.J. Lang J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 25 (2011) Eremophila dendritica Chinnock Published name for Eremophila sp. Dendritica (W.S.Reid AD 98581189) Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila fallax Chinnock Published name for Eremophila sp. Fallax (D.E.Symon 12311) Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila gilesii F.Muell. subsp. gilesii E. gilesii split into two subspecies, only one of which occurs in South Australia. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila glabra (R.Br. ) Ostenf. subsp. Published name for Eremophila glabra (R.Br.) Ostenf. subsp. Murray (A.G.Spooner murrayana Chinnock 14470) Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila hygrophana Chinnock Published name for Eremophila sp. Hygrophana (P.J.Lang B894­2828) Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila obovata L.S.Sm. subsp. Variety obovata raised to subspecies in Chinnock (2007). obovata Eremophila paisleyi F.Muell. subsp. Published name for E. paisleyi F.Muell. subsp. Glandular (F.J.Badman 6011) glandulosa Chinnock Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila parvifolia J.M.Black subsp. Second subspecies recognised by Chinnock (2007) and so autonym established. parvifolia Eremophila platythamnos Diels subsp. Published name for Eremophila platythamnos Diels subsp. Villous (A.C.Robinson villosa Chinnock NPWS82) Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila subfloccosa Benth. subsp. Published name for Eremophila subfloccosa Benth. subsp. Glandulosa (R.Bates glandulosa Chinnock 32961) Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila subfloccosaBenth. subsp. Published name for Eremophila subfloccosa Benth. subsp. Lanata (R.Bates 33587) lanata Chinnock Chinnock. See Chinnock (2007). Eremophila willsii F.Muell. subsp. Variety intregrifolia raised to subspecies. See Chinnock (2007). integrifolia (Ewart) Chinnock Eremophila willsii F.Muell. subsp. willsii Variety raised to subspecies. See Chinnock (2007). Euphorbia alsiniflora Baill. Replacement name for Chamaesyce coghlanii (F.M.Bailey) D.C.Hassall ex P.I.Forst. & R.J.F.Hend. Following molecular work, the Australian Plant Census decision was to adopt the name Euphorbia with Chamaesyce as a subgenus. See PBI Euphorbia Project (ongoing). Euphorbia australis Boiss. Replacement name for Chamaesyce australis (Boiss.) D.C.Hassall. Euphorbia centralis B.G.Thomson Replacement name for Chamaesyce centralis (B.G.Thomson) P.I.Forster & R.J.F. Henderson. Euphorbia dallachyana Boiss. Replacement name for Chamaesyce dallachyana (Boiss.) D.C.Hassall. Euphorbia drummondii Boiss. Replacement name for Chamaesyce drummondii (Boiss.) D.C.Hassall. Euphorbia flindersica Halford & Replacement published name for Chamaesyce sp. Papillose plants (D.E.Symon W.K.Harris 14628) R.M.Barker of Barker et al. (2005). See Halford & Harris (2010). Euphorbia inappendiculata Domin var. Replacement name for Chamaesyce sp. Marree (F.J.Badman 776) W.R.Barker. See queenslandica Domin Halford & Harris (2010) for comment on the identity of this taxon. Euphorbia mitchelliana Boiss. Replacement name for Chamaesyce mitchelliana (Boiss.) D.C.Hassall. Euphorbia schultzii Benth. Replacement name for Chamaesyce schultzii (Benth.)D.C.Hassall. Euphorbia wheeleri Baill. Replacement name for Chamaesyce wheeleri (Baill.)D.C.Hassall. Flaveria trinervia (Spreng.) C.Mohr Previously treated as F. australasica Hook. Bean (2009) stated that F. australasica is the same as F. trinervia and it is introduced, but at this stage we have continued to indicate it as native — to be reviewed. Glinus oppositifolius (L.) Aug.DC. Previously treated as G. oppositifolia (L.) A.DC. Incorrect ending for species name and incorrect authorship. Leptosema chambersii F.Muell. Previously treated as L. chambersii F.Muell. subsp. chambersii. Between 1986 and 1993 subspecies rank was used in the census for no apparent reason and this is now corrected. Myriocephalus rhizocephalus (DC.)Benth. Previously as M. rhizocephalus var. rhizocephalus. However M. rhizocephalus var. pluriflorus has been raised to species level and so there is now no need for the autonym. Olearia pimeleoides (DC.)Benth. Lander (2008) raised subsp. incana to species level and so subsp. pimeleoides is no longer recognised. Ptilotus gaudichaudii (Steud.) J.M.Black Name arising from split of P. gaudichaudii into 3 subspecies rather than 2 varieties. subsp. gaudichaudii See Lally & Barker (2010). Ptilotus gaudichaudii (Steud.) J.M.Black Name arising from split of P. gaudichaudii into 3 subspecies rather than 2 varieties. subsp. parviflorus (Benth.) Lally See Lally & Barker (2010). 98 J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 25 (2011) Name changes in South Australia, 2011 Ptilotus helipteroides (F.Muell.) F.Muell. Previously as P. helipteroides var. helipteroides, but since var. minor is now treated
Recommended publications
  • Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of Offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019

    Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 3841 Number of items in BX 301 thru BX 463 1815 Number of unique text strings used as taxa 990 Taxa offered as bulbs 1056 Taxa offered as seeds 308 Number of genera This does not include the SXs. Top 20 Most Oft Listed: BULBS Times listed SEEDS Times listed Oxalis obtusa 53 Zephyranthes primulina 20 Oxalis flava 36 Rhodophiala bifida 14 Oxalis hirta 25 Habranthus tubispathus 13 Oxalis bowiei 22 Moraea villosa 13 Ferraria crispa 20 Veltheimia bracteata 13 Oxalis sp. 20 Clivia miniata 12 Oxalis purpurea 18 Zephyranthes drummondii 12 Lachenalia mutabilis 17 Zephyranthes reginae 11 Moraea sp. 17 Amaryllis belladonna 10 Amaryllis belladonna 14 Calochortus venustus 10 Oxalis luteola 14 Zephyranthes fosteri 10 Albuca sp. 13 Calochortus luteus 9 Moraea villosa 13 Crinum bulbispermum 9 Oxalis caprina 13 Habranthus robustus 9 Oxalis imbricata 12 Haemanthus albiflos 9 Oxalis namaquana 12 Nerine bowdenii 9 Oxalis engleriana 11 Cyclamen graecum 8 Oxalis melanosticta 'Ken Aslet'11 Fritillaria affinis 8 Moraea ciliata 10 Habranthus brachyandrus 8 Oxalis commutata 10 Zephyranthes 'Pink Beauty' 8 Summary of offerings in the PBS Bulb Exchange, Dec 2012- Nov 2019 Most taxa specify to species level. 34 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for bulbs 23 taxa were listed as Genus sp. for seeds 141 taxa were listed with quoted 'Variety' Top 20 Most often listed Genera BULBS SEEDS Genus N items BXs Genus N items BXs Oxalis 450 64 Zephyranthes 202 35 Lachenalia 125 47 Calochortus 94 15 Moraea 99 31 Moraea
  • Resource Partitioning Among Five Sympatric Mammalian Herbivores on Yanakie Isthmus, South- Eastern Australia

    Resource Partitioning Among Five Sympatric Mammalian Herbivores on Yanakie Isthmus, South- Eastern Australia

    Resource partitioning among five sympatric mammalian herbivores on Yanakie Isthmus, south- eastern Australia Naomi Ezra Davis Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2010 Department of Zoology The University of Melbourne i Abstract This thesis combines multiple approaches to improve our understanding of large herbivore ecology and organisation in a contemporary assemblage made up of species with independent evolutionary histories on Yanakie Isthmus, Wilsons Promontory National Park, Victoria, Australia. In particular, this thesis compares niche parameters among populations of five sympatric native and introduced herbivore species by simultaneously assessing overlap in resource use along two dimensions (spatial and trophic) at multiple scales, thereby providing insight into resource partitioning and competition within this herbivore assemblage. Faecal pellet counts demonstrated that inter-specific overlap in herbivore habitat use on Yanakie Isthmus was low, suggesting that spatial partitioning of habitat resources had occured. However, resource partitioning appeared to be independent of coevolutionary history. Low overlap in habitat use implies low competition, and the lack of clear shifts in habitat use from preferred to suboptimal habitats suggested that inter-specific competition was not strong enough to cause competitive exclusion. However, low overlap in habitat use between the European rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus and other species, and preferential use by rabbits (and avoidance by other species) of the habitat that appeared to have the highest carrying capacity, suggested that rabbits excluded other grazing herbivores from preferred habitat. High overlap in habitat use was apparent between some species, particularly grazers, indicating some potential for competition if resources are limiting.
  • Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report

    Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report

    Geography Monograph Series No. 13 Cravens Peak Scientific Study Report The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. Brisbane, 2009 The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. is a non-profit organization that promotes the study of Geography within educational, scientific, professional, commercial and broader general communities. Since its establishment in 1885, the Society has taken the lead in geo- graphical education, exploration and research in Queensland. Published by: The Royal Geographical Society of Queensland Inc. 237 Milton Road, Milton QLD 4064, Australia Phone: (07) 3368 2066; Fax: (07) 33671011 Email: [email protected] Website: www.rgsq.org.au ISBN 978 0 949286 16 8 ISSN 1037 7158 © 2009 Desktop Publishing: Kevin Long, Page People Pty Ltd (www.pagepeople.com.au) Printing: Snap Printing Milton (www.milton.snapprinting.com.au) Cover: Pemberton Design (www.pembertondesign.com.au) Cover photo: Cravens Peak. Photographer: Nick Rains 2007 State map and Topographic Map provided by: Richard MacNeill, Spatial Information Coordinator, Bush Heritage Australia (www.bushheritage.org.au) Other Titles in the Geography Monograph Series: No 1. Technology Education and Geography in Australia Higher Education No 2. Geography in Society: a Case for Geography in Australian Society No 3. Cape York Peninsula Scientific Study Report No 4. Musselbrook Reserve Scientific Study Report No 5. A Continent for a Nation; and, Dividing Societies No 6. Herald Cays Scientific Study Report No 7. Braving the Bull of Heaven; and, Societal Benefits from Seasonal Climate Forecasting No 8. Antarctica: a Conducted Tour from Ancient to Modern; and, Undara: the Longest Known Young Lava Flow No 9. White Mountains Scientific Study Report No 10.
  • Epacris Study Group

    Epacris Study Group

    AUSTRALIAN NATIVE PLANTS SOCIETY (Australia) Jnc. EPACRIS STUDY GROUP Group Leader: Gwen Elliot, P.O.Box 655 Heathmont Vic. 3135 NEWSLETTER NO. 30 (ISSN 1038-6017) Greetings to all Epacris Study Group members, Regular readers of our Newsletters will have noticed the following note which was added to page 1 of our Autumn 2010 issue, just prior to it going to press. NOTE: I have just received in the post an envelope addressed to the Epacris Study Group, posted from Hobart on May Znd, 2010. Unfortunately the envelope was slit along the bottom and was totally empty. There was no information regarding the sender, but ifyou have sent such a letter in recent days, please let me know, and perhaps cancel any cheque sent. Fortunately all turned out well in the end, as the next morning an Epacris Study Group renewal form was delivered with a $5 note stapled to the corner. Our very nice Post Office manager advised that it had been found on the floor of the district sorting office. He went on to explain that many of today's envelopes have a very effective self-sealing strip and if there is any air left in the envelope when the seal is fastened envelopes can 'pop' at the bottom as they go through the rollers of the sorting machines. This is certainly something I had not personally considered previously, but I felt it is very useful information for us all to be aware of. All of my letters will be squashed down firmly in future to avoid this potential problem.
  • Flowering of Watsonia Laccata As Influenced by Corm Storage and Forcing Temperatures ⁎ J.K

    Flowering of Watsonia Laccata As Influenced by Corm Storage and Forcing Temperatures ⁎ J.K

    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com South African Journal of Botany 77 (2011) 631–637 www.elsevier.com/locate/sajb Flowering of Watsonia laccata as influenced by corm storage and forcing temperatures ⁎ J.K. Suh a, , J.H. Kim a, A.K. Lee a, M.S. Roh b a Dankook University, College of Bio-Resources Science, Department of Environmental Horticulture, Cheonan, Chungnam 330-714, Republic of Korea b US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Arboretum, Floral and Nursery Plants Research Unit, Beltsville MD 20705, USA Received 24 March 2010; received in revised form 28 November 2010; accepted 22 December 2010 Abstract The genus Watsonia, belonging to the family Iridaceae, is comprised of about 50 species including W. laccata (Jacquin) Ker Gawler that flowers from September to November following low temperature and winter rainfall. Therefore, we hypothesized that flowering would be favored by forcing at low greenhouse temperatures. Using clonal W. laccata corms, four experiments were designed to investigate the effect of temperatures during corm storage, forcing, and their interaction on growth and flowering. Corm formation is favored by growing plants at 18°– 20°/15°–17 °C and 21°–23°/18°–20 °C, day/night temperatures. Flowering was earliest with corms produced at 24°–26°/18°–20 °C and forced at 18°–20/15°–17 °C, and was significantly delayed when forced at 27°–29°/24°–26 °C. Flowering was, however, favored by 2 or 4 weeks of high temperatures (27°–29°/24°–26 °C) prior to forcing at low temperatures (18°–20°/15°–17 °C). The number of florets was not significantly affected by corm storage, forcing temperatures, or their interaction, although forcing at high temperatures tends to reduce the floret number.
  • Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment

    Background Detailed Flora and Vegetation Assessment

    Our ref: EEN18041.003 Level 2, 27-31 Troode Street West Perth WA 6005 T +61 8 9211 1111 Date: 04 June 2019 Tanya McColgan Bellevue Gold Limited Suite 3, Level 3, 24 Outram Street WEST PERTH WA 6008 Dear Tanya, Flora and vegetation values identified within PoW 79431 In response to your request for the preliminary results of the detailed flora and vegetation assessment undertaken over the Bellevue Gold Project area, RPS Australia West Pty Ltd (RPS) herein provides a summary of the key results and outcomes of the assessment in lieu of the final report which is due in July. Background Bellevue Gold Ltd (Bellevue Gold) is currently undertaking an exploration drilling program within mining tenement M3625 for the Bellevue Gold Project (the Project). The Project is located in the north-eastern Goldfields; approximately 40 km north of the township of Leinster in the Shire of Leonora. The Project is situated on and surrounded by pastoral lands and is located on Yakabindie cattle station. RPS was commissioned by Bellevue Gold to undertake a detailed flora and vegetation assessment over M3625 and part of M3624 to encompass the area where exploration drilling is currently underway and including the potential mining and associated infrastructure footprint (the proposed development area). The survey area, the proposed development area and the PoW 79431 area are shown in Figure A. RPS understands that the Department of Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety (DMIRS) and the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) have requested additional information regarding the natural values of the PoW area, where in-fill drilling is proposed, in order to adequately assess the PoW application.
  • Muelleria : an Australian Journal of Botany

    Muelleria : an Australian Journal of Botany

    Muelleria Volume 5 Number 1 March, 1982 NATIONAL HERBARIUM OF VICTORIA DEPARTMENT OF CROWN LANDS AND SURVEY Muelleria Volume 5, Number 1 March, 1982 CONTENTS Page A revision of the genus Templelonia R.Br. (Papilionaceae) — J. H. Ross 1 The nomenclature of some Australian lichens described as Lecanora and Placodium by Miiller-Argoviensis — R. W. Rogers 31 New Australian species of Nymphoides Seguier (Menyanthaceae) — Helen 1. Aston 35 Vegetation of East Gippsland — S. J. Forbes, N. G. Walsh and P. K. Gullan 53 A new Australian lichen: Cladonia sulcata — A. W. Archer 115 Editor: Helen 1. Aston Published by the National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL). Royal Botanic Gardens, South Yarra, Victoria 3141, Australia. D. M. Churchill, Director and Government Botanist. 43346/81 The date of publication of Volume 4, number 4, was 20 May 1981. A REVISION OF THE GENUS TEMPLETONIA R.Br. (PAPILIONACEAE) by J. H. Ross* ABSTRACT The endemic Australian genus Templetonia is revised. Eleven species are recognized and the uncertainty concerning the application of the name T. sulcata (Meissn.) Benth. is discussed. This discussion includes the selection ol a lectotype for Bossiaea rossii F. Muell., a possible synonym. Descriptions, a key to the identification of species, illustrations, and distribution maps are provided, together with notes on ecology and relationships. Two previous papers describing T. incana (.Muelleria 4: 247-249 (1980)) and T. negketa (loc. cit. 390-393 (1981)) should be used in conjunction with the present revision. INTRODUCTION Templetonia, a small genus of 1 1 species described by R. Brown in Ait. f Hort. , Kew. ed. 2, 4: 269 (1812), was named in honour of the Irish botanist John Templeton (1776-1825) ot Orange Grove, Belfast.
  • Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Main and Northwest Channels of Cooper Creek, South Australia, April-May 2012

    Vegetation and Soil Assessment of Selected Waterholes of the Main and Northwest Channels of Cooper Creek, South Australia, April-May 2012

    VEGETATION AND SOIL ASSESSMENT OF SELECTED WATERHOLES OF THE MAIN AND NORTHWEST CHANNELS OF COOPER CREEK, SOUTH AUSTRALIA, APRIL-MAY 2012 J.S. Gillen1and J.R.W. Reid2 October 2013 Report to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board 1 2 Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University DISCLAIMER The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, and its employees do not warrant or make any representation regarding the use, or results of use of the information contained herein as to its correctness, accuracy, reliability, currency or otherwise. The South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board and its employees expressly disclaim all liability or responsibility to any person using the information or advice. This report may be cited as: Gillen, J.S. and Reid, J.R.W., 2013, Vegetation and soil assessment of selected waterholes of the main and northwest channels of Cooper Creek, South Australia, April-May 2012. A report by the Australian National University to the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, Port Augusta. Cover images: L) Algal film on a Cooper Creek waterhole R) Cooper Creek in flood, 2011 © South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Commonwealth), no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission obtained from the South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be directed to the Regional Manager, South Australian Arid Lands Natural Resources Management Board, Railway Station Building, PO Box 2227, Port Augusta, SA, 5700 Table of Contents 1.
  • Special Issue3.7 MB

    Special Issue3.7 MB

    Volume Eleven Conservation Science 2016 Western Australia Review and synthesis of knowledge of insular ecology, with emphasis on the islands of Western Australia IAN ABBOTT and ALLAN WILLS i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION 2 METHODS 17 Data sources 17 Personal knowledge 17 Assumptions 17 Nomenclatural conventions 17 PRELIMINARY 18 Concepts and definitions 18 Island nomenclature 18 Scope 20 INSULAR FEATURES AND THE ISLAND SYNDROME 20 Physical description 20 Biological description 23 Reduced species richness 23 Occurrence of endemic species or subspecies 23 Occurrence of unique ecosystems 27 Species characteristic of WA islands 27 Hyperabundance 30 Habitat changes 31 Behavioural changes 32 Morphological changes 33 Changes in niches 35 Genetic changes 35 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK 36 Degree of exposure to wave action and salt spray 36 Normal exposure 36 Extreme exposure and tidal surge 40 Substrate 41 Topographic variation 42 Maximum elevation 43 Climate 44 Number and extent of vegetation and other types of habitat present 45 Degree of isolation from the nearest source area 49 History: Time since separation (or formation) 52 Planar area 54 Presence of breeding seals, seabirds, and turtles 59 Presence of Indigenous people 60 Activities of Europeans 63 Sampling completeness and comparability 81 Ecological interactions 83 Coups de foudres 94 LINKAGES BETWEEN THE 15 FACTORS 94 ii THE TRANSITION FROM MAINLAND TO ISLAND: KNOWNS; KNOWN UNKNOWNS; AND UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS 96 SPECIES TURNOVER 99 Landbird species 100 Seabird species 108 Waterbird
  • Rote Liste Der Farn- Und Samenpflanzen Hessens

    Rote Liste Der Farn- Und Samenpflanzen Hessens

    Rote Liste der Farn- und Samenpflanzen Hessens 4. Fassung Erstellt von der Arbeitsgruppe "Rote Liste der Farn- und Samenpflanzen Hessens" der Botanischen Vereini- gung für Naturschutz in Hessen e. V. (BVNH) im Auftrag des Hessischen Ministeriums für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucher- schutz (HMULV). Zuständigkeiten innerhalb der Arbeitsgruppe: Koordination und Redaktion: Klaus Hemm Region Nordwest: Achim Frede, Ralf Kubosch, Detlef Mahn, Stefan Nawrath & Michael Uebeler Region Nordost: Uwe Barth & Thomas Gregor Region Südwest: Karl Peter Buttler & Ralf Hand Region Südost: Rainer Cezanne, Sylvain Hodvina, Stefan Huck & Klaus Hemm Bearbeiter einzelner Gruppen: Habichtskraut (Hieracium) Günter Gottschlich Löwenzahn (Taraxacum) Klaus Jung & Stefan Huck Florenliste: Karl Peter Buttler 2 Die Erstellung der Roten Liste erfolgte unter Mitarbeit von: Kurt Baumann, Ralph Baumgärtel, Winfried Becker, Dirk Bönsel, Giselbert Breyer, Werner Eger, Wolfgang Ehmke, Uta Engel, Martina Förster, Brigitte Emmi Frahm-Jaudes, Friedrich Graffmann, Jutta und Manfred Haas, Ortwin Heinrich, Berthold Hilgendorf, Uta Hillesheim- Kimmel, Helmut Jesberg, Klaus-Dieter Jung, Hartmut Kaiser, Heinz Kalheber, Gerhard Kesper, Hans Klüber, Andreas König, Wolfgang Lehmann, Wolfgang Ludwig, Thomas Michl, Claus Neckermann, Bernd Nowak, Indra Ottich, Jürgen Pusch, Markus Schönmüller, Günter Schwab, Ralf Schwab, Dietmar Teuber, Christel Wedra, Jörg Weise, Markus Wieden, Rüdiger Wittig, Wolfgang Wagner, Claudia Wrede und Helmut Zeh. Dank Für Hinweise, Anregungen und Auskünfte sowie die Bereitstellung von Daten, ohne die diese Neuauflage der Roten Liste und der Florenliste nicht hätte fertiggestellt werden können, danken die Bearbeiter allen Beteiligten herzlich. Ein besonderer Dank gilt Herrn Ortwin Heinrich, der uns Daten des Arbeitskreises Heimische Orchideen (AHO Hessen) zur Auswertung zugänglich gemacht hat. 3 Inhalt 1. Einleitung 4 2.
  • La Familia Aloaceae En La Flora Alóctona Valenciana

    La Familia Aloaceae En La Flora Alóctona Valenciana

    Monografías de la revista Bouteloua, 6 La familia Aloaceae en la flora alóctona valenciana Daniel Guillot Ortiz, Emilio Laguna Lumbreras & Josep Antoni Rosselló Picornell La familia Aloaceae en la flora alóctona valenciana Autores: Daniel GUILLOT ORTIZ, Emilio LAGUNA LUMBRERAS & Josep Antoni ROSSELLÓ PICORNELL Monografías de la revista Bouteloua, nº 6, 58 pp. Disponible en: www.floramontiberica.org [email protected] En portada ejemplar del género Aloe, imagen tomada de la obra de Munting (1696) Naauwkeurige Beschyving der Aardgewassen, cortesía de Piet Van der Meer. Edición ebook: José Luis Benito Alonso (Jolube Consultor Botánico y Editor. www.jolube.es) Jaca (Huesca), septiembre de 2009. ISBN ebook: 978-84-937291-3-4 Derechos de copia y reproducción gestionados por el Centro Español de Derechos reprográficos. Monografías de la revista Bouteloua, 6 La familia Aloaceae en la flora alóctona valenciana Daniel Guillot Ortiz, Emilio Laguna Lumbreras & Josep Antoni Rosselló Picornell Valencia, 2008 Agradecimientos: A Piet Van der Meer La familia Aloaceae en la flora alóctona valenciana Índice Introducción ................................................................. 7 Descripción ................................................................... 7 Corología ...................................................................... 7 Taxonomía .................................................................... 7 El género Aloe L. ........................................................... 8 El género Gasteria Duval ...........................................
  • APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report

    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report

    APPENDIX D Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore EIR BIOLOGICAL TECHNICAL REPORT PROPOSED CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORE PROJECT CITY OF OCEANSIDE, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: EnviroApplications, Inc. 2831 Camino del Rio South, Suite 214 San Diego, California 92108 Contact: Megan Hill 619-291-3636 Prepared by: 4629 Cass Street, #192 San Diego, California 92109 Contact: Melissa Busby 858-334-9507 September 29, 2020 Revised March 23, 2021 Biological Technical Report CarMax Auto Superstore TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 6 1.1 Proposed Project Location .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Proposed Project Description ............................................................................... 6 SECTION 2.0 – METHODS AND SURVEY LIMITATIONS ............................................ 8 2.1 Background Research .......................................................................................... 8 2.2 General Biological Resources Survey .................................................................. 8 2.3 Jurisdictional Delineation ...................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Jurisdiction .................................................... 9 2.3.2 Regional Water Quality